Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair

Adult umbilical hernia is a common surgical condition mainly encountered in the fifth and sixth decade of life. Despite the high frequency of the umbilical hernia repair procedure, disappointingly high recurrence rates, up to 54% for simple suture repair, are reported. Since both mesh and suture techniques are used in our clinic we set out to investigate the respective recurrence rates and associated complications, retrospectively. Patients who were treated between January 1998 and December 2002 were identified from our hospital database and invited to attend the outpatient department for an extra follow-up, history taking and physical examination. The use of prosthetic material, occurrence of surgical site infection, body mass and height as well as recurrence were recorded at the time of this survey. In total, 131 consecutive patients underwent operative repair of an umbilical hernia. Twenty-eight percent of the patients were female (n=37). In 12 patients (11%) umbilical hernia repair was achieved with mesh implantation. Fourteen umbilical hernia recurrences were noted (13%); none had been repaired using mesh. No relationship was found between wound infection or obesity and umbilical hernia recurrence. In the light of these results it is necessary to re-evaluate our clinical “guidelines” on mesh placement in umbilical hernia repair: apparently not every umbilical fascial defect needs mesh repair. Research should focus on establishing risk factors for hernia recurrence.     

Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs

Background

Repair of primary ventral hernias (PVH) such as umbilical hernias is a common surgical procedure. There is a paucity of risk-adjusted data comparing suture versus mesh repair of these hernias. We compared preperitoneal polypropylene (PP) repair versus suture repair for elective umbilical hernia repair.

Methods

A retrospective review of all elective open PVH repairs at a single institution from 2000–2010 was performed. Only patients with suture or PP repair of umbilical hernias were included. Univariate analysis was conducted and propensity for treatment-adjusted multivariate logistic regression.

Results

There were 442 elective open PVH repairs performed; 392 met our inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 126 (32.1%) had a PP repair and 266 (67.9%) underwent suture repair. Median (range) follow-up was 60 mo (1–143). Patients who underwent PP repair had more surgical site infections (SSIs; 19.8% versus 7.9%, P < 0.01) and seromas (14.3% versus 4.1%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in recurrence (5.6% versus 7.5%, P = 0.53). On propensity score–adjusted multivariate analysis, we found that body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.10) and smoking status (OR, 2.3) were associated with recurrence. Mesh (OR, 2.34) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (OR, 1.95) were associated with SSI. Only mesh (OR, 3.41) was associated with seroma formation.

Conclusions

Although there was a trend toward more recurrence with suture repair in our study, this was not statistically significant. Mesh repair was associated with more SSI and seromas. Further prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to clarify the role of suture and mesh repair in PVH.     

Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies and meta-analyses have indicated that non-mesh repair is inferior to mesh repair based on recurrence rates in inguinal hernia. The only reliable way to evaluate recurrence rates after hernia surgery is by long-term follow-up. METHODS: Between September 1993 and January 1996, a multicentre clinical trial was performed, in which 300 patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. Long-term follow-up was carried out from June 2005 to January 2006. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 128 months for non-mesh and 129 months for mesh repair. The 10-year cumulative hernia recurrence rates were 17 and 1 per cent respectively (P = 0.005). Half of the recurrences developed after 3 years' follow-up. There was no significant correlation between hernia recurrence and age, level of expertise of the surgeon, contralateral hernia, obesity, history of pulmonary disease, constipation or prostate disease. CONCLUSION: After 10 years mesh repair is still superior to non-mesh hernia repair. Recurrence rates may be underestimated as recurrences continue to develop for up to 10 years after surgery.     

Long-term recurrence and complication rates after incisional hernia repair with the open onlay technique

Background  

Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery is a well-known complication. Controversy still exists with respect to the choice of hernia repair technique. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term recurrence rate as well as surgical complications in a consecutive group of patients undergoing open repair using an onlay mesh technique.     

Long-term recurrence and complication rates after incisional hernia repair with the open onlay technique

Background

Family history, male gender and age are significant risk factors for inguinal hernia disease. Family history provides evidence for a genetic trait and could explain early recurrence after inguinal hernia repair despite technical advance at least in a subgroup of patients. This study evaluates if age and family history can be identified as risk factors for early recurrence after primary hernia repair.

Methods

We performed an observational cohort study for 75 patients having at least two recurrent hernias. The impact of age, gender and family history on the onset of primary hernias, age at first recurrence and recurrence rates was investigated.

Results

44% (33/75) of recurrent hernia patients had a family history and primary as well as recurrent hernias occurred significantly earlier in this group (p = 0.04). The older the patients were at onset the earlier they got a recurrent hernia. Smoking could be identified as on additional risk factor for early onset of hernia disease but not for hernia recurrence.

Conclusion

Our data reveal an increased incidence of family history for recurrent hernia patients when compared with primary hernia patients. Patients with a family history have their primary hernias as well as their recurrence at younger age then patients without a family history. Though recurrent hernia has to be regarded as a disease caused by multiple factors, a family history may be considered as a criterion to identify the risk for recurrence before the primary operation.     

Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias

Purpose

Elective repair for umbilical or epigastric hernia is a frequent minor surgical procedure. Several studies have demonstrated chronic pain after groin hernia repair but long-term complaints have been only scarcely studied. This study was undertaken to investigate long-term pain and discomfort after open repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias.

Methods

This is a retrospective study with prospective long-term follow-up. Only elective primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with an open mesh or sutured repair were included. A structured follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients regarding verbal rating scores (VRS) of pain and discomfort (no, little, moderate, or severe) and recurrence. Patients with suspected recurrence were clinically examined.

Results

There were 139 eligible patients, and 132 patients answered the questionnaire (95 % response rate). The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 15–85), and defect size was 1.0 cm (0.2–8.0). Sixteen patients reported moderate or severe pain and/or discomfort (12 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 6–18). The cumulated risk of recurrence was 11.5 %. Of the 15 patients with clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence, 5 patients reported moderate/severe complaints (31 %) whereas 11 of the remaining 116 patients with no recurrence (10 %) reported moderate/severe complaints (P = 0.014).

Conclusion

Surprisingly, many patients complained about pain and discomfort 3 years after elective repair for a small umbilical or epigastric hernia.     

Plug-technique for umbilical hernia repair in the adult

BACKGROUND: Umbilical hernia represents 6% of all abdominal wall hernias in the adult. Surgical repair should always be carried out due to possible occurrence of complications. Aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of the plug-technique. METHODS: From October 1995 to April 2000, the authors performed 21 operations for acquired umbilical hernia with a defect smaller than 4 cm. Local anesthesia was used and a light intravenous sedation added in particularly anxious patients. The repair was achieved by insertion of a polypropylene dart plug sutured to the margins of the hernial defect. RESULTS: All patients were up and about straightaway and were discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Postoperative pain was mild and required hospital analgesia in only 19% of cases and domiciliary analgesia in 24%. During a follow-up ranging from 6 to 60 months (mean 30), only one recurrence has been recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This tension-free technique allows immediate rehabilitation, with few complications and a low recurrence rate.     

Long-term results after incisional hernia repair

After repair of incisional hernia, 154 patients were followed up for periods ranging from 4 to 10 years. An actuarial analysis showed a cumulated recurrence rate of 31%, with most recurrences appearing in the first three years. The recurrence rate after repair of recurrent incisional hernia was 44%. A cautious attitude to surgical treatment of incisional hernia is suggested if the patient has only mild discomfort.     

Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair

Incisional hernias occur primarily as a result of high tension and inadequate healing of a previous incision, the latter of which is frequently related to infection at the surgical site. Despite recent advances in operative techniques, the recurrence rate remains unacceptably high. To evaluate the impact of different predisposing factors for the recurrence of incisional hernia, we reviewed retrospectively the medical records of 297 patients who had undergone incisional herniorrhaphy (188 tissue repairs, 109 mesh repairs) in our hospital. Demographic data (age and gender), type of repair, body mass index, hernia size, presence of chronic illnesses and wound complications were evaluated in a univariate and multivariate manner analysis. The overall recurrence rate was 30.3%, with the recurrence rate in patients who underwent tissue repair being 39.4% and that in patients following prosthetic repair 14.6%. The recurrence rate was significantly influenced by type of repair, obesity, hernia size, wound healing disorders and some chronic comorbidities. We conclude that it is necessary to become familar with the risk factors for recurrence of incisional hernia in order to eliminate or decrease their effect on the positive outcome of incisional herniorrhaphy.     

仍然要重视疝修补手术后的复发

当前腹股沟疝修补手术后的复发率,各家报告不一。Haapnicrni从瑞典疝登记中心的1992年至2004年的107818例资料分析中看到,补片修补后的复发率为1.00%~1.91%,包括有平片、网塞和腹膜前间隙修补;组织对组织修补的复发率为2.11%~2.67%,包括有Shouldice手术等;而腹腔镜修补的复发率为1.40%~1.70%(TEP和TAPP)。美国Itany在2006年报告手术切口疝经过15年随访后发现缝合组三年随访的复发率为43%,而补片组的发生率为24%。一次手术后作再修补后的再复发率为23.8%,两次手术后作再修补后的再复发率为35.3%,三次手术后作再修补后的再复发率为38.7%。…     

Inguinal hernia recurrence after prosthetic repair: our experience

Inguinal hernia recurrence after prosthetic repair is a very rare clinical condition (1%), but it is probably underestimated and hard to resolve surgically. The authors reports their experience with 16 recurrent post-prosthetic inguinal hernias. A greater incidence of recurrence was noted in obese patients with concomitant chronic diseases (56%). Hernia recurrences following prosthetic repair are often asymptomatic. The use of Lichtenstein's plug technique yielded satisfactory results in terms of rehabilitation and incidence of recurrence and is also associated with a very low risk of complications.     

Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of quality assurance on the recurrence rate after hernia repair. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: District hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: All (n = 1232) patients aged 15-80 years operated upon for inguinal or femoral hernia in Motala 1984, 1986-1988, 1990, and 1992-1994. INTERVENTION: A questionnaire enquiring about pain or a lump in the operated area was sent 3-6 years postoperatively to all patients, excluding those who had already been operated on for recurrence and those who had died. Selected cases were examined depending on the answers to the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence rate estimated by adding already confirmed recurrences to those found at the clinical examination; reoperation for recurrence; hospital stay; and number of day cases. Cumulative incidence of reoperation was analysed by actuarial analysis of all patients operated on from 1986-1997. RESULTS: The recurrence rate decreased from 18% in 1984 and 1986 to 3% in 1993 and 1994. The reoperation rate for recurrence at three years was 10.8% (95% confidence interval, CI: 9.3 to 12.2%), 3.6% (2.6 to 4.4%) and 2.2% (1.7 to 2.7%) for patients operated on between 1986-1988, 1989-1991 and 1992-1997, respectively. Differences between the first and the second and between the first and the third period were both highly significant (p < 0.001) whereas the difference between the second and third period was not (p = 0.09). Mean hospital stay decreased from 3.5 days in 1984 to 0.9 days in 1994. CONCLUSION: By recording recurrence rate or its surrogate endpoint, reoperation rate for recurrence, or both, hospital stay, and number of day cases, and presenting these results to participating surgeons, we provided incentives to improve outcome. This has resulted in a rapid decrease in recurrence rate and a shortened hospital stay, thereby improving cost-effectiveness.     

Patient satisfaction,chronic pain,and quality of life after elective incisional hernia repair: effects of recurrence and repair technique

Purpose  

To determine the effects of repair technique and hernia recurrence on patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair.