How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system

BACKGROUND: In surgery, intact gloves protect the surgeon from bloodborne pathogens and the surgical wound from microorganisms on the skin of the surgeon. However, glove perforation is very common, and puncture rates as high as 61% are published in the literature. One objective of this study was to compare puncture rates between a unique double-gloving puncture indication system and single-use gloves, and another was to determine the extent to which glove perforations remain undetected during surgery. METHODS: The study material comprised all gloves used in surgical operations at our hospital for a period of 2 months. The analysis was made by the glove type in a prospective and randomized manner. Gloves were tested immediately after the surgical procedure using the approved standardized water-leak method for 2 minutes to detect any holes. The gloves used in this study were either a double-gloving puncture indication system or the standard glove used at our hospital. RESULTS: In 885 operations altogether, 2,462 gloves were tested; 1,020 single gloves, 1,148 double-glove systems, and 294 combination gloves were studied. The overall perforation rate was 192 out of 2,462 gloves (7.80%), and 162 out of 885 operations (18.3%). The detection of perforation during surgery was 28 out of 76 (36.84%) with single gloves, 77 out of 89 with the double-gloving system (86.52%), and 9 out of 27 with combination gloves (33.33%; P <0.001). The inner glove of the double-gloving system was punctured in 6 out of 88 outer glove perforations (6.82%). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the critical importance of safety at work by having a sterile barrier between surgeon and patient, it is very important to use a double-gloving puncture indication system, at least in operations where there is a high risk of glove perforation.     

Effect of chlorhexidine scrub on postoperative bacterial counts

Chlorhexidine surgical scrub was left on the surgeon's hands in 50 orthopedic and vascular surgical procedures to determine whether the number of bacteria on the hands could be decreased postoperatively. After a standard 5-minute scrub, one hand was randomly rinsed prior to gloving; the other was lightly patted with a sterile towel, leaving some foam on the hand. The surgeon then gloved and performed the procedure in the usual manner. After the operation, both hands were immersed in a tryptic soy broth for 30 seconds. The broth was then cultured for bacterial species and number. Cases in which glove puncture occurred were not cultured. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. There were fewer bacterial colonies isolated from the hand coated with chlorhexidine scrub versus the other; this difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.005). There also seemed to be a trend towards higher bacterial counts after longer operations; however, the difference was not significant. Neither surgeon noted any evidence of dermatitis during the study. These results suggest that leaving chlorhexidine scrub on the hands during surgery can lead to lower bacterial counts on the surgeon's hands and less chance of wound contamination should glove puncture occur.     

Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures. Cloth compared with latex

A randomized prospective study was undertaken to determine the rate of punctures of the inner glove when techniques of double-gloving were employed for orthopaedic operations. Group I consisted of twenty-five procedures in which double latex gloves were used, and Group II comprised another twenty-five in which latex inner gloves and cloth outer gloves were worn. As the outer glove was expected to act as a barrier against puncture of the inner glove, only inner gloves were tested. All glove exchanges done intraoperatively for presumed tears of the inner glove were noted, as were punctures of the skin. The type and length of the procedure were also documented. Group I (double latex gloves) had a significantly higher rate of total inner-glove perforations per procedure (p less than 0.0001) than Group II (cloth and latex gloves). Furthermore, unrecognized perforations were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (p less than 0.01). In Group I, the number of punctures increased with the duration of the operation; a puncture was found in all procedures in which the operation lasted longer than three hours (p less than 0.01). In Group II, only two tears of the inner glove occurred. Both were unrecognized and were independent of the duration of the operation.     

A randomised trial of the durability of non-allergenic latex-free surgical gloves versus latex gloves.

A prospective randomised trial was performed to compare the robustness of a new non-latex surgical glove with a standard latex glove when worn by four general surgeons in a district general hospital. Gloves were retrieved after surgery and examined using the European Standard Test for punctures. The overall puncture rate was 10.1%, and there was no significant difference in the rates between the two types of glove, although punctures in the non-latex glove tended to be larger and more readily noted by the wearer. The increase in latex allergy among health care staff dictates the need for gloves made from other materials, which may also be useful for operations on latex-allergic patients.     

Glove perforation in pediatric orthopaedic surgery

Three hundred eighty-three pairs of gloves were tested for punctures after 100 consecutive pediatric orthopaedic operations to assess the rate, site, procedure, and maneuver during which glove puncture accidents took place. Evidence of perforation was found in 14% of the gloves used. Surgeons appear to be significantly more at risk for glove perforation than do other members of the operating team.     

Surgical glove perforation

In a study to investigate the incidence and significance of surgical glove perforation, bacterial contamination of surgeons' hands and gloves before and after operation was measured and the gloves tested for damage. Perforations were found in 74 of 582 gloves (12.7 per cent) and occurred in 34.5 per cent of operations. Glove perforation did not influence bacterial counts on the surgeons' hands or on the outside of their gloves. A separate clinical study of 100 adult hernia repairs gave no evidence that perforation increased wound sepsis. After standard pre-operative hand preparation, glove perforations are of no clinical significance to the patient, but their high incidence should alert surgeons to the need for protection against pathogens transmissible during surgery, such as hepatitis B and the human immunodeficiency virus. Protection of the surgeon is the main indication for preoperative change of damaged gloves.     

Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves

This study assesses the perforation rate of single and double gloves and thus the extent to which double gloving protects the surgeon from diseases transmissible from the patient. We have also investigated whether double gloving offers the patient extra protection by reducing wound sepsis. Two hundred adult hernia repairs were performed, the first 100 single gloved and the second 100 double gloved. Glove perforation rates were not significantly different between single gloves and the outer of the double gloves. Although 46 of 400 outer gloves were perforated there were only 15 inner glove perforations and only eight of these matched the outer perforations. The percentage of operations in which the latex protective barrier was breached was reduced from 31 per cent when the surgeon wore single gloves to 8 per cent with double gloves. Wound sepsis was not increased by glove perforation nor reduced by double gloving. While careful technique remains mandatory we conclude that double gloving offers increased protection to the surgeon operating on high risk infectious cases.     

Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team

Double-glove perforation rates and perforation rates in standard single-gloved operating teams were compared, in order to determine whether double gloving provides additional protection for the operating team. Patients were randomized to undergo surgery with a double-gloved or single-gloved operating team. All gloves worn during the operation were tested for perforations by water-filling and individual digital distension; 115 single-gloved operations and 103 double-gloved operations were performed. There were 841 individual operating team members 'at risk'. In the single-glove group, 20.8% of individuals had perforations, but only 2.5% had perforations in both inner and outer gloves (dual perforation) in the double-glove group (P less than 0.0001). The surgeon was most at risk of glove perforation (34.7% of cases in the single-glove group, 3.8% dual perforation in the double-glove group). Longer operations were associated with increased risk of glove perforation. Double-gloving significantly reduces the risk of skin contamination by blood and body fluids and is recommended for all high risk cases.     

Multicentre study of detection and false-negative rates in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy has recently evolved as a means of staging the axilla in breast cancer with minimal surgical trauma. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to identify factors that influenced the detection and false-negative rates during the learning phase. METHODS: Data on all 498 sentinel node biopsies performed between August 1997 and December 1999 in Sweden were collected. RESULTS: A sentinel node was found in 450 patients (90 per cent). Preoperative scintigraphy visualized 83 per cent of all sentinel nodes. The detection rate was higher with same-day injection of tracer than with injection the day before (96 versus 86 per cent; P < 0.01). Dye injected less than 5 min or more than 30 min before the start of the operation lowered the detection rate (less than 60 per cent versus more than 65 per cent; P = 0.02). The detection rate varied from 61 to 100 per cent between surgeons. The false-negative rate was 11 per cent. The presence of multiple tumour foci and a high S-phase fraction increased the risk of a false-negative sentinel node, whereas the number of operations performed by each surgeon was less important. CONCLUSION: Training of the individual surgeon influenced the detection rate, as did timing of tracer and dye injection. The false-negative rate seemed to be related to biological factors.     

Hazards to surgeons in trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery: use of an electronic device to warn of intraoperative glove perforations.

An electronic device intended to detect glove punctures as they occur peroperatively has been described previously. This study reports the experience of its use in 80 orthopaedic cases. The device detected all punctures, except one, where fluid could have contacted the surgeon's hand (n = 16). Wet gowns and drapes are potential routes for transmission of pathogens, and were responsible for the alarm sounding on 30 occasions. This device can minimise the exposure to potentially hazardous body fluids when glove punctures are not clinically apparent.     

Indications and prognosis of preventive and simultaneous operations of the abdominal cavity

The potential risk implied in prophylactic operations is just as high as that elective interventions. Indications must be subject to stringent deliminating criteria. Required are thorough elucidation and documentation as well as comprehensive substantiation. Operations of that kind may be performed even without elaborate advance planning, if indications are urgent. Simultaneous operations are accompanied by higher risk in cases of major surgery or if one of the interventions is septic. High risk factors were recordable from combined stomach and bile duct surgery, when performed simultaneously. Morbidity amounted to 13 per cent (pulmonary embolism and pneumonia) and lethality to 15 per cent. Simultaneous operations should be performed by an experienced surgeon who should be a fast worker.     

Risks of blood exposure to the cardiac surgical team

The risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus from patient to cardiac surgical team is perceived by most people to be very slight, yet the possibility is a valid concern. The feasibility of "barrier protection" in prevention of this risk is dependent on integrity of surgical gloves and absence of splashes of body fluids into eyes and broken skin. These factors were observed and recorded in 50 coronary bypass operations and 17 valve replacements. There was a high risk of glove penetrations (one to two per team member per operation) and of skin punctures, lacerations, or eye splashes (from 0.4 to 1.5 instances per operation). Better gloves and more self-defensive surgical techniques are indicated.     

Wound management after colon injury: open or closed? A prospective randomized trial

It is unknown whether leaving the skin wound open to heal by secondary intention is associated with a lower rate of wound infections compared with primary skin-wound closure after operations for colon injuries. From June 1998 to December 2000 at our Level I academic trauma center 48 patients entered into a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and were randomized to have their skin wound primarily closed (CLOSED-RCT) or left open (OPEN-RCT). At the same time patients not included in the RCT were followed prospectively. At the discretion of the surgeon their skin wounds were managed by primary closure (CLOSED-nonRCT) or were left open (OPEN-nonRCT). Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to identify independent risk factors of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and necrotizing soft tissue infection. Wound infection developed in 65 per cent of CLOSED-RCT and 36 per cent of OPEN-RCT patients (P = 0.04) and wound dehiscence in 31 per cent and 14 per cent respectively (P = 0.18). No remarkable differences were noted in any other variable including length of hospital stay. Wound infection developed in 29 per cent of CLOSED-nonRCT and 15 per cent of OPEN-nonRCT patients (P = 0.46). There were three independent risk factors of wound infection: primary wound closure [odds ratio (OR) = 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.8-19.4], colectomy (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.2-10.4), and intraabdominal infection (OR = 5.3, 95% CI = 1.3-24.2). There were two independent risk factors for wound dehiscence and/or necrotizing soft tissue infection: wound infection (OR = 20.9, 95% CI = 4.9-152.3) and intra-abdominal infection (OR = 19.3, 95% CI = 4.0-146.9). Primary closure of the wound almost doubles the rate of wound infection compared with leaving the wound open in operations for colon injuries. Primary wound closure is a risk factor for wound infection and wound infection is a risk factor for wound dehiscence or necrotizing soft tissue infection. Because of the complexity of evaluating the real clinical significance of superficial wound infection larger studies on trauma patients are required.     

Needlestick injuries at operations for trauma. Are surgical gloves an effective barrier?

Surgeons are at risk from both hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency viruses. While vaccines have been developed against the former, barrier methods remain the mainstay of protection. Puncture wounds of the hand are a potential source of contamination; the protection afforded by surgical gloves has been investigated. Gloves from 280 orthopaedic operations for trauma were tested for perforations; one or more was found after 30% of the operations in gloves worn by the surgeon or scrub nurse. About 60% of the perforations were noticed at the time of penetration and most affected the dominant thumb and index finger. Puncture was more common during operations lasting more than one hour. The incidence of perforation was 19% for the outer of double gloves, 14% for a single glove and 6% for the inner of double gloves. These results indicate that surgical gloves function poorly as a protective barrier, especially in difficult, lengthy, fracture surgery. The practice of double-gloving confers increased but not absolute protection.     

A decade of selective use of adjustable cutting seton combined with fistulotomy for anal fistula

Previous studies have demonstrated that the division of sphincter muscle in the treatment of anal fistula may precipitate fecal incontinence. Cutting setons may pose a particular risk of unrecoverable injury to the sphincter apparatus. To evaluate if the use of an adjustable cutting seton mitigates this risk, we performed a retrospective review of all patients operated on for anal fistulae in a 10-year period by a single surgeon. Adjustable cutting setons (consisting of heavy silk ligature with patient-controllable tension) were used selectively. Forty-seven patients met the study criteria. Ninety-four per cent of the fistulae treated were transsphincteric. All of the fistulae were treated with at least partial fistulotomy. Ninety-nine per cent of patients were followed to completion of treatment. One (2%) patient subsequently developed fecal incontinence, and four (9%) developed a recurrent or persistent fistula in the same location. Adjustable cutting setons have been used in our practice with a high success rate and low risk of complications. Our data support adjustable cutting setons as a useful tool in the surgeon's repertoire for treating fistulae that involve the anal sphincter complex.     

Postsplenectomy complications

Postsplenectomy complications were reviewed among 420 patients with simple splenic injury, splenic plus multisystem trauma, elective splenectomy, incidental or accidental splenectomy, and those having splenectomy prior to renal transplantation. Complications not specifically related to splenectomy occurred postoperatively in 52 per cent and 41 per cent, respectively, in the complex trauma and incidental-accidental splenectomy groups. Nonfatal complications specifically related to splenectomy occurred in 15 per cent of patients with multi-organ injury and in 18 per cent of patients with incidental-accidental splenic removal. Morbidity was infrequent when simple splenic trauma prompted splenectomy or in elective splenectomy. Mortality related to splenectomy occurred most often following renal transplantation, but also appeared high when the spleen was removed for multiple trauma or incidental to other surgery. The latter category is at risk for morbidity and mortality when splenectomy is incidental to a planned procedure (e.g., radical gastrectomy) or accidental as when injured by the surgeon. These splenectomies and those planned prior to transplantation may be unnecessary in many instances. The postsplenectomy sepsis syndrome was encountered late only once in this entire series; nonetheless, sound indications for splenectomy must prevail before splenic removal since significant early morbidity and mortality follows splenectomy.     

Accidental injuries and blood exposure to cardiothoracic surgical teams.

A survey was undertaken over a 15-week period (62 working days) to find out the incidence and common mechanism of accidental injuries and blood exposure in cardiothoracic surgical teams. Two hundred and seventy events were reported: 70% glove penetrations, 18% skin punctures, 4% non-bleeding skin lesions and 8% lacerations with bleeding. Eye splashes occurred in 14% of the cases. The risk to the team was higher for cardiac surgery (1.6) than for thoracic surgery (0.5) and endoscopy (0.01). Most of the events were self-inflicted by experienced personnel. The surgeon's left index finger was most frequently injured, and the majority of the injuries were caused by needles followed by wire injuries during sternal closure. Prevention should be directed towards a safer technique for sternal closure, and protection of the surgeon's hands, especially his left index finger, should be found. Eye protection with goggles should become routine. This study demonstrates that open heart procedures carry a high risk of injury and frequent exposure to blood increasing the risk to the surgical team of acquiring viral infections (hepatitis-B and HIV) from the patients.     

Intraoperative contamination of synthetic vascular grafts. Effect of glove change before graft implantation. A prospective randomised study.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the incidence of intraoperative graft contamination, bacterial species and the influence of change of surgeon's gloves on contamination. DESIGN: a prospective randomised study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: forty patients had implantation of synthetic vascular grafts. All patients received intraoperative cloxacillin (2.0 g) or clindamycin (0.6 g) intravenously. The procedures were randomised to two groups: Group 1 - surgeons changed the gloves before the first contact with the vascular prosthesis and Group 2 - operation without glove change. The growth of all bacterial species from graft segments and from the gloves was recorded. The susceptibility to antibiotics was tested. RESULTS: the number of contaminated grafts was similar in the two groups. Growth of bacteria was recorded from 92.5% (37/40) of the graft segments and 33% (51/156) of glove imprints. Of the cultured species, 75% and 47%, respectively, were identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). Twenty-eight per cent of CNS were resistant to cloxacillin, 15% to clindamycin, and 10% to cloxacillin and clindamycin. In all, 25% of the CNS strains were resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. In 50% of cases, the antibiogram of the CNS strain recovered from gloves agreed with that of the strain harvested from the graft. CONCLUSIONS: a high incidence of graft contamination was found which was not reduced by changing gloves. However, changing gloves did seem to reduce the number of bacterial species.     

Incidence of pathogenic bacteria from mesenteric lymph nodes and ileal serosa during Crohn's disease surgery

Samples of ileal serosa and mesenteric lymph nodes have been harvested before antibiotic administration during 46 non-contaminated operations for Crohn's disease and compared with 43 operations for conditions other than Crohn's. Potentially pathogenic bacteria were isolated from the serosa in 12 (27 per cent) Crohn's patients, compared with 6 (15 per cent) controls (P = 0.04). Intestinal bacteria were recovered from mesenteric nodes in 15 (33 per cent) Crohn's patients compared with 2 (5 per cent) controls (P = 0.006). These findings suggest that bacteria leak from the small bowel lumen in a high proportion of Crohn's disease patients. This may explain the pathogenesis of abscess and fistula in this disorder as well as the high rate of sepsis following elective surgery even in the absence of macroscopic contamination.     

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO TYPES OF LATEX SURGICAL GLOVES IN ELECTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY

Glove perforation during surgery represents a potential risk of infection for the surgeon. The authors postulated that thicker latex gloves may offer greater protection. The perforation rates for the Ansell Gammex? glove and the thicker Baxter Triflex? gloves were compared in single- and double-glove usage and no difference was found between the two brands, in either usage. The authors recommend double-gloving for all orthopaedic operations with regular glove changes during major procedures.