Effect of Radiotherapy on the Survival of Patients With Stage I and Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Analysis of the Surveillance,Epidemiology and End Results Database

BackgroundRadiotherapy is a treatment option for stage I and stage II MCL. However, data demonstrating the role of RT in a larger patient population and its real world effects are unknown.Materials and MethodsTo demonstrate the role of RT in the OS of patients with stage I and stage II MCL, we performed a retrospective analysis of the SEER database. Included patients were adults with age > 40 years who had MCL stages I and II, and diagnosis between 1992 and 2010. We excluded patients lacking information on demographic characteristics, survival, and RT. Patients were analyzed in 2 groups, those treated with initial RT (RT group) and those not treated with initial RT (no-RT group).ResultsA total of 657 patients were eligible for analysis with 178 patients in the RT group and 479 patients in the no-RT group. The median age of the study group was 68 years. The RT group had a significantly greater proportion of patients with age < 60, male sex, and extranodal disease. Median OS was 103 months in the RT group versus 66 months in the no-RT group (P = .002). On Multivariate analysis, treatment with initial RT was associated with a lower hazard for mortality (hazard ratio, 0.767; 95% confidence interval, 0.602-0.979; P = .033). Age < 60, stage I disease, and extranodal disease were independently associated with a significantly decreased hazard for mortality on Multivariate analysis.ConclusionAlthough stage I and stage II MCL constitute only a small proportion of this disease, our study demonstrates that upfront RT improves the OS of these patients.     

Poorer Prognosis of African-American Patients With Mycosis Fungoides: An Analysis of the SEER Dataset, 1988 to 2008

BackgroundThe aims of this study were: (1) to determine whether AA patients with MF have a worse prognosis despite accounting for varying clinical factors at presentation, and (2) to assess whether a racial disparity exists regarding utilization of radiation therapy (RT) as an initial treatment modality.Materials and MethodsThe SEER 1988-2008 public use database was investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to assess for factors significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and RT utilization survival.ResultsA total of 4892 patients with MF were identified with a median follow-up of 58 months. On multivariate analysis including tumor registry, age, sex, marital status, and tumor stage, AA race was significantly correlated with a worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; P < .001) and DSS (HR, 1.78; P < .001). With regard to RT utilization, more advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.005; P < .001) and higher stage (OR, 3.03; P < .001) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving RT, whereas female sex (OR, 0.81; P = .03) was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving RT. AA race was not significantly associated with RT utilization (P = .58).ConclusionAA race was associated with poorer survival despite accounting for demographic factors and tumor stage. Differences in RT utilization according to AA race were not found, however RT was less utilized for female patients. The etiology of this poorer prognosis is unclear and might be related to access to medical care, socioeconomic factors, or undetermined biological differences.     

Does Prophylactic Paraortic Lymph Node Irradiation Improve Outcomes in Women With Stage IIIC1 Endometrial Carcinoma?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of prophylactic paraortic lymph node (PALN) radiation therapy (RT) on clinical outcomes in patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018 stage IIIC1 endometrial cancer (EC).Methods and MaterialsA multi-institutional retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018 stage IIIC1 EC lymph node assessment, status postsurgical staging, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and RT using various sequencing regimens. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed by Cox proportional hazard models for RFS/OS. In addition, propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of the radiation field extent on survival outcomes.ResultsA total of 378 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 45.8 months. Pelvic RT was delivered to 286 patients, and 92 patients received pelvic and PALN RT. The estimated OS and RFS rates at 5 years for the entire cohort were 80% and 69%, respectively. There was no difference in the 5-year OS (77% vs 87%, P = .47) and RFS rates (67% vs 70%, P = .78) between patients treated with pelvic RT and those treated with pelvic and prophylactic PALN RT, respectively. After propensity score matching, the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of prophylactic PALN RT versus pelvic RT were 1.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-3.19; P = .28) for OS and 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-2.42; P = .51) for RFS, suggesting that prophylactic PALN RT does not improve survival outcomes. Distant recurrence was the most common site of first recurrence, and the extent of RT field was not associated with the site of first recurrence (P = .79).ConclusionsProphylactic PALN RT was not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes in stage IIIC1 EC. Distant metastasis remains the most common site of failure despite routine use of systemic chemotherapy. New therapeutic approaches are necessary to optimize the outcomes for women with stage IIIC1 EC.     

Effect of Thoracic Radiotherapy Timing and Fractionation on Survival in Nonmetastatic Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

BackgroundThe optimal timing of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) in relation to chemotherapy is unknown in the treatment of nonmetastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We analyzed the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to assess the effect on overall survival (OS) of RT timing with chemotherapy for patients with SCLC.Materials and MethodsThe NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic SCLC from 1998 to 2011 who had undergone definitive chemoradiation. The patients were stratified into quartiles according to the interval between the start of chemotherapy and the start of RT. The first and second quartiles (RT started 0-20 days after chemotherapy) were classified as “early” RT and the third and fourth quartiles (RT started 21-126 days after chemotherapy) as “late” RT. Patients were included if they had received hyperfractionated 45 Gy in 30 fractions or standard fractionation of ≥ 60 Gy in 1.8- to 2-Gy fractions. Kaplan-Meier analyses of OS were performed, and multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the effect of the covariates on OS.ResultsA total of 8391 patients were included (50.5% had received early RT). Early RT was associated with significant improvement in survival (5-year OS, 21.9% vs. 19.1%; P = .01). On subgroup analysis, the survival advantage for early RT was significant for patients receiving hyperfractionated RT (5-year OS, 28.2% vs. 21.2%; P = .004) but not for those receiving standard fractionation (19.8% vs. 18.4%; P = .29). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, hyperfractionated RT was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.96; P = .001), but early RT was not (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04; P = .53).ConclusionThese data support the early initiation of hyperfractionated thoracic RT for nonmetastatic SCLC.     

Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma: A Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

IntroductionPulmonary carcinosarcoma (PC) is a rare malignant neoplasm composed of epithelial and mesenchymal components. It accounts for < 1% of thoracic cancers and is not fully understood. This study examined Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PC and assessed survival outcomes by treatment modality and stage.Patients and MethodsSEER data were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with primary PC (1973-2012). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed by univariate/multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier methods.ResultsA total of 411 patients were included. Median age was 67 (range, 24-96) years. Disease stage at the time of initial diagnosis was known for 74.7% of the identified patients (307/411). Of these patients, 23.1% had localized disease. Survival was significantly better for patients with localized disease (OS: 31 vs. 6 months, P < .001; DSS: 54 vs. 8 months, P < .001). Additionally, patients who received surgery alone had significantly improved OS (20 months; P < .001) and DSS (32 months; P < .001) compared to patients who received combined surgery and radiotherapy (OS: 7 months; DSS: 8 months) or radiotherapy alone (OS: 4 months; DSS: 4 months).ConclusionTreatment with surgery alone resulted in superior survival outcomes compared to other treatment modality combinations, regardless of patient age and disease stage. Within the limitations of this study, providers may wish to consider these findings when devising patient treatment plans.     

Prognostic Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Stage III NSCLC Treated With Chemoradiation Followed by Consolidation Pembrolizumab: A Subset Analysis of a Phase II Study From the Hoosier Cancer Research Network LUN 14-179

IntroductionThe Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) LUN 14-179 is a phase II trial of consolidation pembrolizumab after concurrent chemoradiation for the treatment of patients with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Time to metastatic disease or death (TMDD), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) appear to be superior to that in historical controls of chemoradiation alone. Unfortunately, not all patients benefit from consolidation immunotherapy. We performed a univariate analysis to evaluate variables associated with PFS, metastatic disease, and OS.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in HCRN LUN 14-179. Data collected included age, sex, stage, smoking status, programmed death ligand 1 status, Grade (G) ≥ 2 versus G ≤ 1 adverse event, G ≤ 2 versus G ≥ 3 pneumonitis, duration of pembrolizumab (< 4 vs. ≥ 4 cycles), chemotherapy regimen, performance status 0 versus 1, time to start pembrolizumab (4-6 vs. 6-8 weeks from radiation), volume of lung receiving at least 20 Gy of radiation (V₂₀; < 20% vs. ≥ 20%). Univariable Cox regression was performed to determine the variables associated with 3 end points: TMDD, PFS, and OS.ResultsFrom April 2015 to December 2016, 93 patients were enrolled and 92 were included in the efficacy analysis (1 patient was ineligible). For TMDD, improved outcomes might be associated (P < .1) with stage IIIA and ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab. For PFS, improved outcomes (P < .1) might be seen for ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, stage IIIA and V₂₀ < 20%. For OS, improved outcomes (P < .1) might be seen for stage IIIA and ≥ 4 cycles of pembrolizumab.ConclusionStage IIIA and longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment might be associated with prolonged TMDD, PFS, and OS for patients with stage III NSCLC treated with chemoradiation followed by pembrolizumab.     

Outcomes for Young Men With Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of the NCDB

BackgroundPrimary management of localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer consists of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT) with short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or RT alone. The purpose of this study was to determine if these treatment strategies have equivalent overall survival (OS) in patients < 55 years old with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Patients and MethodsWe identified 35,134 patients in the National Cancer Data Base with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with RP, RT + ADT, or RT from 2004 to 2013. Ten-year OS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed by multivariate Cox regression.ResultsA total of 29,920 patients (85.2%) underwent RP, 1393 (4.0%) RT + ADT, and 3821 (10.9%) RT. Median patient age was 51 years old, and median follow-up was 59.9 months. Ten-year OS was estimated to be 94.2% for RP, 80.7% for RT + ADT, and 85.2% for RT (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, treatment with RT + ADT or RT was associated with significantly worse OS compared to treatment with RP (RT + ADT HR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.67-2.54, P < .0001; RT HR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.71-2.33, P < .0001). Patients who met all 3 of the intermediate-risk criteria showed worse OS compared to patients who met only one criterion (HR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.32-2.44; P = .0002).ConclusionRP is significantly more likely than RT + ADT or RT to be used as a primary treatment for young men with localized intermediate prostate cancer. RP was also associated with improved OS compared to RT + ADT and RT.     

Outcome of Adolescents and Young Adults Compared With Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid and Promyelocytic Leukemia

BackgroundStudies on the outcome of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are limited.MethodsWe compared the outcome of AYA (19-30 years) patients with AML and PML and pediatric (0-18 years) patients with AML (pAMLs) and APL (pAPLs) utilizing the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-18 registry. Early mortality rate (EMR), defined as mortality within 1 month of diagnosis, was used as a surrogate for treatment-related mortality. Survival statistics were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsA total of 6343 patients with AML were identified; 44.7% were AYAs. pAMLs had lower EMR (6.2% vs. 9.2%; P < .01) and higher overall survival (OS) (1-year, 70.3% vs. 62.1%; 5-year, 48.2% vs. 36.4%; P < .01). Nine hundred twenty patients with APL were also identified; 59.5% were AYAs. No statistically significant difference was found between AYAs with APL and pAPLs in EMR (11.4% vs. 14.1%; P = .23) and OS (1-year, 83.8% vs. 81.2%; P = .31 and 5-year, 68.2% vs. 73.1%; P = .11]. Comparing all patients with AML and APL, AYAs with APL and pAPLs had higher EMR (11.4% and 14.1% vs. 6.2% and 9.2%; P ≤ .01) but better OS than AYAs with AML and pAMLs (5-year OS, 68.2% and 73.1% vs. 48.2% and 36.4%; P ≤ .01).ConclusionOur analysis shows AYAs with AML have worse EMR and OS compared with pAMLs. AYAs with APL and pAPLs have similar outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting outcomes of AYAs with APL and pAPLs using a large population-based registry and their comparison with same age patients with AML.     

Impact of Tumor Location on Patient Outcomes in Small Bowel Cancers

BackgroundSmall bowel cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies and tumor location impact on outcomes is unclear.Material and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on stage I to IV small bowel cancer cases from 2000 to 2017 in British Columbia, Canada. Baseline patient characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by tumor location and systemic therapy use patterns were summarized.ResultsOf 340 patients included, primary tumor distribution was: duodenum (51.2%), ileum (19.1%), jejunum (18.5%), and unspecified (11.2%). Median DFS for stage I to III disease was 37.7, 49.1, and 26.7 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .018). Median OS was 9.6, 35.2, and 20.1 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P < .0001). Compared to duodenal primaries, both jejunal and ileal tumors were associated with significantly improved OS (HR 0.43, P < .001 for jejunal; HR 0.71, P = .035 for ileal). Adjuvant therapy was given to 21.6% of stage II and 50.6% of stage III cancers. Among patients with metastatic disease, median OS was 4.2, 11.4, and 6.9 months for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal tumors (P = .0019). Jejunal tumors had the best prognosis (HR 0.48, P = .001 vs. duodenum).ConclusionSurvival differences exist when small bowel cancers were assessed by tumor location, and jejunal tumors portended better prognosis overall.     

Increased Bone Marrow Plasma-Cell Percentage Predicts Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

BackgroundPrevious reports have suggested that a higher bone marrow plasma-cell percentage (BMPC%) is associated with worse outcomes. However, it is unknown whether BMPC% is an independent predictor because genetic information was not available at that time. Currently the impact of BMPC% at diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is not well described.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated the prognostic impact of BMPC% ≥ 60% versus < 60% in 1426 newly diagnosed MM patients. All patients had an estimation of their BMPC% at diagnosis, and the highest percentage was used. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed for age, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) score, creatinine level, and BMPC%.ResultsBMPC% ≥ 60% was found in 562 patients (39%), and the median PFS was shorter for these patients compared to BMPC% < 60% (22.6 vs. 32.1 months; P < .0001). Also, for OS, the median was shorter for the higher BMPC% group (53.4 vs. 75.4 months; P < .0001). On the multivariate analysis for PFS, age ≥ 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; P < .0001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.49; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.23; P = .015) were predictive. On the multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥ 65 years (HR, 2.23; P < .001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.41; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.24; P = .02) were also predictive.ConclusionBMPC% ≥ 60% at diagnosis is predictive for PFS and OS, even in a multivariate analysis that included known prognostic factors for MM.     

Determinants of Survival in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Targeted Therapies

BackgroundMolecular profiling of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples has a profound impact on choice of therapy. However, it is less clear whether EGFR and KRAS mutations are prognostic outside of a trial-based treatment paradigm.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 513 patients with NSCLC undergoing EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between May 2008 and November 2011. Survival analysis was based on the 376 patients who received systemic treatment, and their survival was determined from the date of initiation of systemic therapy.ResultsThe median overall survival (OS) was 30.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-36.9). Neither EGFR mutational status (P = .09) nor KRAS mutational status (0.69) was associated with OS. Female sex (P < .001), never smoker status (P = .01), better performance status (PS) (P < .001), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < .001), and lower age-weighted index (P < .001) were associated with prolonged survival. The presence of bone metastases (P = .001) and liver metastases (P = .004) was also associated with a shortened survival. In a multivariable regression that adjusted for stage, we demonstrated that male gender (P = .002), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS (P = .01), metastases to bone (P = .03), and higher age-weighted comorbidity index (P = .001) were independent prognostic factors for shorter survival. EGFR mutation status was not prognostic (P = .85).ConclusionIn our series, EGFR and KRAS do not function as prognostic determinants for NSCLC.     

Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC)

BackgroundWe sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsRetrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors.ResultsWe analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionsPretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.     

Prognostic Impact of ABO Blood Group on Survival in Patients With Malignant Lymphoma

BackgroundThe ABO blood group is reported to be associated with survival for several types of malignancy. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic significance of the ABO blood group in patients with malignant lymphoma.Patients and MethodsA total of 523 patients with malignant lymphoma were included in this study. The primary outcome measured was the association between the ABO blood group and survival.ResultsPatients with blood group B had shorter 5-year overall survival (OS) than patients with non-B blood groups (40.9% vs. 57.3%; P < .01). Among 240 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients with blood group B had shorter 5-year OS in comparison with patients with non-B blood groups (36.3% vs. 56.9%; P < .01). Among male patients with DLBCL, those with blood group B had significantly shorter 5-year OS than those with non-B blood groups (27.5% vs. 55.8%; P = .003). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the survival between female patients with blood group B and those with non-B blood groups (5-year OS: 49.2% vs. 58.2%; P = .67). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that blood group B (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.78; P = .04) was an independent predictor of shorter OS in male patients with DLBCL.ConclusionThe ABO blood group is associated with survival in patients with lymphoma. Interestingly, only male patients with DLBCL with blood group B had significantly shorter OS than those male patients with DLBCL with non-B blood groups.     

Tumor Volume Is a Better Prognostic Factor than Greatest Tumor Diameter in Operated Stage I-III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of tumor volume (TV, recorded from surgical specimens) on patients with stage I-III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection.Materials and MethodsA total of 129 patients with stage I-III NSCLC diagnosed and underwent curative resection from 2007 to 2014 in our center were included in the study. Their clinico-pathological factors were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's hazard model. According to the ROC analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups (Group 1: 58 patients <30.3 cm³ and Group 2: 71 patients ≥30.3 cm³) and the OS and DFS values were compared.ResultsMedian TVs and greatest tumor diameter were 12 cm³ (0.1-30) / 3 cm (0.4-6.5) in Group 1 and 98 cm³ (30.6-1521) / 6 cm (3.5-21) in Group 2. Median OS was 53 (5-177) months in Group 1 and 38 (2-200) months in Group 2 (P < .001). DFS was similar in both group (28 [1-140] vs. 24 [1-155] months, Introduction P = .489). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher OS rates in Group 1 than Group 2 (P = .04). In multivariable analysis (TV, tumor T stage, tumor N stage, receiving adjuvant radiotherapy) showed that TV (HR: 0.293, 95% CI: 0.121-0.707, P = .006) and tumor N stage (HR: 0.013, 95% CI: 0.001-0.191, P = .02) were independent factors associated with OS.ConclusionTumor volume, not considered in the routine TNM classification, may improve prediction accuracy of overall OS in operated Stage I-III NSCLC.     

Comparison of Two Pediatric-Inspired Regimens to Hyper-CVAD in Hispanic Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BackgroundPediatric-inspired regimens (PIR) in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have led to better long-term outcomes. In Latin America, the adolescent and young adult population has an increasing incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with poor outcomes (5-year OS of approximately 20%) with traditional regimens.Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with PIR in two reference centers in Mexico City between March 2016 and June 2019, in which the primary endpoint was OS, compared to a historic cohort of patients treated with hyper-CVAD treated between February 2009 and June 2015.ResultsWe compared 73 patients treated with PIR (46 and 27 received modified versions of the ALL-BFM 90 and CALGB C10403 regimens, respectively) and 173 patients treated with hyper-CVAD. Patients treated with PIR experienced higher 4-week complete response rates (79.5% vs. 64.2%; P = .02) and lower relapse rates (44.1% vs. 60.0%; P = .04). OS was significantly higher with PIR than with hyper-CVAD (24 months: 41.5% vs. 28.1%; P = .012). The benefit on OS for PIR was only significant for CALGB (24-month OS: 61.1% vs. 28.0%; P = .01) but not for BFM. In the multivariate analysis, hyperleukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.22; P = .02), autologous stem-cell transplantation (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86; P = .02), and 4-week complete response (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; P < .01) were independent prognostic factors. For the group of patients older than 20 years, only CALGB had an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .04).ConclusionIn terms of 4-week complete response, relapse rates, and OS, PIR provides benefits to Hispanic patients.     

Systemic Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Population-based Analysis of Incidence and Survival

IntroductionSystemic ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-positive ALCL) is a T-cell lymphoma. Owing to its rarity, variations in incidence and survival at the population level are not clearly known.Materials and MethodsUsing the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER 18), we selected patients aged ≥ 20 years with ALK-positive ALCL, diagnosed between 2001 and 2013. Incidence rate, overall survival (OS), and its determinants were analyzed with a significance level of P < .05.ResultsWe identified 1604 patients with a median age of 54 years. The disease incidence increased significantly with advancing age, with higher incidence in Blacks and lower incidence in American Indians and Asian/Pacific Islanders as compared with Whites. The 5-year OS significantly declined as the age advanced (age 20-40 years, 68.7%; age 41-60 years, 53.8%; age 61-80 years, 28.9%; age > 80 years, 15.2%; P < .01) and varied with race (Whites, 49.7% vs. Blacks, 37.7% vs. Asian/Pacific Islander, 42.8% vs. American Indian, 35.8%; P = .03). On multivariate analysis, treatment with radiation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59-0.87; P < .01) and year of diagnosis from 2009 through 2013 (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P < .01) were associated with lower mortality. Advanced age, Black race (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.65; P < .01), and advanced disease stage (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.51-2.02; P < .01) were associated with higher mortality.ConclusionIncidence and survival of ALK-positive ALCL varies significantly with patients' demographic characteristics as identified in our study. Treatment strategies need to be tailored accordingly to address these variations and ensure uniform access to care.     

Timing of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Current Therapies

BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) during the initial treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). While awaiting further prospective data, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients at our program.Patients and MethodsWe included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had undergone stem cell harvest (SCH) from 2005 to 2014 and separated them into early (SCT within 12 months of diagnosis) and delayed (all others, including SCT not yet) groups. The outcomes were OS, PFS to first relapse, and PFS to second relapse.ResultsOf the 514 patients who had undergone SCH, 227 were in the early and 287 in the delayed groups. Patients in the delayed group who had undergone SCT had received more therapy before SCT (55% had received ≥ 2 lines vs. 6% in the early group; P < .001), had had more progressive disease at SCT (34% vs. 4%; P < .001), had received melphalan doses < 200 mg/m² (22% vs. 10%; P = .001), and had had lower rates of very good partial response or better after SCT (58% vs. 79%; P = .001). On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in median OS (90 vs. 84 months; P = .093), PFS to first relapse (40 vs. 37 months; P = .552), or PFS to second relapse (54 vs. 52 months; P = .488) between the early and delayed groups.ConclusionDelaying SCT did not affect OS or even PFS to second relapse in our cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had received current era induction therapy.     

Up-front Therapy With CHOP Plus Etoposide in Brazilian nodal PTCL Patients: Increased Toxicity and No Survival Benefit Compared to CHOP Regimen–Results of a Real-Life Study From a Middle-Income Country

BackgroundNodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (nPTCL) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with aggressive behavior and poor-survival. They are more prevalent in Latin America and Asia, although data from Brazil are scarce. Its primary therapy is still controversial and ineffective. Therefore, we aim to describe clinical-epidemiological characteristics, outcomes, predictors factors for survival and compare the results of patients treated with CHOP and CHOEP regimens.MethodsRetrospective, observational and single-center study involving 124 nPTCL patients from Brazil treated from 2000 to 2019.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 59.2% and 37.3%, respectively. The median age was 48.5 years and 57.3% (71/124) were male, 81.5% (101/124) had B-symptoms, 88.7% (110/124) had advanced disease (stage III/IV) and 58.1% (72/124) presented International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3, reflecting a real-life cohort. ORR to first-line therapy was 58.9%, 37.9% (N = 47) received CHOP-21 and 35.5% (N = 44) were treated with CHOEP-21; 30.1% (37/124) underwent to consolidation with involved field radiotherapy (IF-RT) and 32.3% (40/124) were consolidated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The overall response rate (ORR) was similar for CHOP-21 (76.6%) and CHOEP-21 (65.9%), P = .259. Refractory disease was less frequent in the CHOEP-21 group (4.5% vs. 21.2%, P = .018). However, few patients were able to complete 6-cycles of CHOEP-21 (31.8%) than to CHOP-21 (61.7%), P = .003. Delays ≥2 weeks among the cycles of chemotherapy were more frequent for patients receiving CHOEP-21 (43.1% vs. 10.6%), P = .0004, as well as the toxicities, including G3-4 neutropenia (88% vs. 57%, P = .001), febrile neutropenia (70% vs. 38%, P = .003) and G3-4 thrombocytopenia (63% vs. 27%, P = .0007). The 2-year OS was higher for CHOP (78.7%) than CHOEP group (61.4%), P = .05, as well as 2-year PFS (69.7% vs. 25.0%, P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, high LDH (HR 3.38, P = .007) was associated with decreased OS. CR at first line (HR: 0.09, P < .001) and consolidation with ASCT (HR: 0.08, P = .015) were predictors of increased OS.ConclusionIn the largest cohort of nPTCL from Latin America, patients had poor survival and high rate of chemo-resistance. In our cohort, the addition of etoposide to the CHOP-21 backbone showed no survival benefit and was associated with high-toxicity and frequent treatment interruptions. Normal LDH values, obtaintion of CR and consolidation with ASCT were independent factors associated with better outcomes.     

Survival benefit for patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) undergoing re-irradiation at first progression: A matched-cohort analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-HGG/DIPG working group

BackgroundOverall survival (OS) of patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is poor. The purpose of this study is to analyse benefit and toxicity of re-irradiation at first progression.MethodsAt first progression, 31 children with DIPG, aged 2–16 years, underwent re-irradiation (dose 19.8–30.0 Gy) alone (n = 16) or combined with systemic therapy (n = 15). At initial presentation, all patients had typical symptoms and characteristic MRI features of DIPG, or biopsy-proven high-grade glioma. An interval of ≥3 months after upfront radiotherapy was required before re-irradiation. Thirty-nine patients fulfilling the same criteria receiving radiotherapy at diagnosis, followed by best supportive care (n = 20) or systemic therapy (n = 19) at progression but no re-irradiation, were eligible for a matched-cohort analysis.ResultsMedian OS for patients undergoing re-irradiation was 13.7 months. For a similar median progression-free survival after upfront radiotherapy (8.2 versus 7.7 months; P = .58), a significant benefit in median OS (13.7 versus 10.3 months; P = .04) was observed in favour of patients undergoing re-irradiation. Survival benefit of re-irradiation increased with a longer interval between end-of-radiotherapy and first progression (3–6 months: 4.0 versus 2.7; P < .01; 6–12 months: 6.4 versus 3.3; P = .04). Clinical improvement with re-irradiation was observed in 24/31 (77%) patients. No grade 4–5 toxicity was recorded. On multivariable analysis, interval to progression (corrected hazard ratio = .27–.54; P < .01) and re-irradiation (corrected hazard ratio = .18–.22; P < .01) remained prognostic for survival. A risk score (RS), comprising 5 categories, was developed to predict survival from first progression (ROC: .79). Median survival ranges from 1.0 month (RS-1) to 6.7 months (RS-5).ConclusionsThe majority of patients with DIPG, responding to upfront radiotherapy, do benefit of re-irradiation with acceptable tolerability.     

Characteristics and Outcome of Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma in North America: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience

BackgroundExtranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is rare and clinical data from non-Asian countries are lacking. It is unclear whether outcomes and disease natural history is similar to reported Asian series. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients with ENKTL from major North American centers.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with newly-diagnosed CD56 + ENKTL and studied disease characteristics and clinical outcomes.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-one patients with ENKTL diagnosed between June 1990 and November 2012 were identified. Eighty-three patients (69%) had stage I/II disease and were treated with combined modality therapy (CMT) (n = 53), chemotherapy alone (CT) (n = 14) or radiotherapy alone (RT) (n = 16).  Thirty-eight patients (31%) had stage III/IV disease and were treated with CMT (n = 12), CT (n = 23), or RT (n = 3).  The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 51 months. Patients with stage I/II disease, compared to those with stage III/IV disease, had superior 2-year progression free survival (PFS) 43% vs 19% (P = .03) and overall survival (OS) 59% vs. 29% (P= .004). Outcomes were similar for stage I/II patients who received CMT vs. RT alone with 2-year PFS (53% vs. 47%; P= .91) and OS (67% vs. 67%; P= .58). No significant differences in outcomes were noted based on race/ethnicity.ConclusionsThis series represents a large experience of ENKTL treated at several major North American academic centers.  Our data are consistent with Asian studies: (1) majority of patients present with early-stage disease; (2) overall poor outcome regardless of race/ethnicity; (3) CMT likely yields favorable outcomes for suitable candidates with early-stage disease.