Patterns of Care for Older Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Population-based Study

BackgroundCurrent treatments for myelofibrosis (MF) are largely palliative, with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib being the breakthrough approved for higher-risk patients by the United States Food and Drug Administration in November 2011. There are limited data on the “real-world” clinical experiences among patients with MF who are treated in the JAK inhibitor era.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated patterns of care for older patients with MF before and after ruxolitinib approval, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Treatment patterns were assessed using Medicare part B and D claims.ResultsThis study included 528 patients diagnosed during 2007 to 2015, with a median age at diagnosis of 76 years. Among 298 patients diagnosed in the ruxolitinib era (2012-2015), 113 (37.9%) were ruxolitinib users. Similar numbers of users started ruxolitinib at 5, 10, 15, or 20 milligrams twice a day (BID). Among 31 patients starting at 5 milligrams BID or less, 48.4% were unable to escalate the dose, and < 11 users could increase the dose to the maximum 25 mg BID. Approximately one-half of ruxolitinib users took hydroxyurea and/or prednisone simultaneously with ruxolitinib. The median time on ruxolitinib was 11.9 months (interquartile range, 4.2-21.7 months).ConclusionIt would be important to optimize the use of ruxolitinib and develop new drugs that may be administered together with or after ruxolitinib to accomplish better outcomes in older patients with MF.     

Real-World Dosing Patterns of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Who Are Resistant to or Intolerant of Hydroxyurea

IntroductionApproximately one-quarter of patients with polycythemia vera become resistant to and/or intolerant of hydroxyurea. This analysis characterizes reasons patients were switched from hydroxyurea to ruxolitinib and describes ruxolitinib dosing patterns and outcomes in real-world clinical practice.Patients and MethodsThis medical chart review of United States community hematology/oncology practices in the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network included patients with polycythemia vera who were ≥18 years old, received hydroxyurea for ≥3 months, started ruxolitinib between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, and had ≥2 visits during the subsequent 6 months. Clinical data were collected at predefined intervals from diagnosis to last provider visit.ResultsProviders identified 249 patients for inclusion. jcauses of hydroxyurea discontinuation were resistance (78%; frequently for hematocrit ≥45% [79%]) and intolerance (28%; frequently for nausea/vomiting [50%]). Initial ruxolitinib dosing was 10 mg twice daily (recommended dose) in 131 patients (53%). Among these patients, median treatment duration was 29.2 months, 35 (27%) had dose modification (increase, n = 24; decrease, n = 11) and 4 had interruptions within 6 months. The most common reason for dose increase was continued need for phlebotomy (46%); 6 patients had dose reductions owing to reduced platelets. Hematocrit control at initiation and during the first 6 months of ruxolitinib treatment was 15% and 63%, respectively.ConclusionMost patients initiated ruxolitinib upon hydroxyurea resistance. Approximately half initiated ruxolitinib at the recommended dose, 27% of whom experienced dosing modifications within the first 6 months. After switching to ruxolitinib, most patients achieved hematocrit control and continued treatment for extended time frames.     

Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Use and Benefit of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide in Myelofibrosis

IntroductionAnemia in myelofibrosis (MF) occurs frequently, is poorly addressed by US Food and Drug Administration–approved JAK inhibitors, and negatively impacts quality of life. Immunomodulatory imide agents (IMiDs) such as thalidomide and lenalidomide are among the limited treatment options that have demonstrated anemia benefit in single-arm studies.Patients and MethodsTo better understand the comparative impact of lenalidomide and thalidomide in MF patients, we analyzed 176 consecutive MF patients who received lenalidomide or thalidomide for at least 4 weeks. We sought to understand the variability in patient populations receiving lenalidomide versus thalidomide, to assess the efficacy of these agents, and to investigate clinical or genomic features that predict response.ResultsClinical benefit (CB) was assessable in 83 lenalidomide- and 67 thalidomide-treated patients. Thalidomide-treated patients were more likely to have thrombocytopenia (P < .001) and high-risk disease (P = .02). Forty-one (49%) lenalidomide-treated patients were deemed to have CB, predominantly due to anemia benefit. Similarly, 28 (42%) of thalidomide-treated patients had CB attributable to anemia benefit. Overall survival was similar for lenalidomide- and thalidomide-treated patients (P = .51). Lenalidomide-treated patients with CB had longer overall survival than those who did not (P = .01). High-risk mutations were found in 12 (41%) of 29 and 20 (57%) of 35 patients treated with lenalidomide and thalidomide, respectively (P = .32). Splicing mutations were common in both cohorts, though thalidomide-treated patients were more likely to have a high-risk SRSF2 or U2AF1 Q157 mutation (P = .01).ConclusionOverall, in this retrospective analysis, lenalidomide and thalidomide showed similar rates of CB in a cohort of MF patients that frequently harbored splicing mutations.     

Analysis of Predictive Factors for Early Response to Ruxolitinib in 320 Patients with Myelofibrosis From the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) Registry

IntroductionRuxolitinib is widely used in myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not optimally respond and require more efficacious treatment. Our analysis aimed to establish predictors of ruxolitinib response.Patients and MethodsWe designed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ruxolitinib treatment in patients with MF in 15 Polish hematology centers. As responses to ruxolitinib occur within the first 6 months, we used this point to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Symptoms response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the MF constitutional symptoms assessed by Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS). Spleen response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the difference between the spleen's baseline length and the upper limit norm measured by ultrasonography.Results320 MF patients were enrolled. At 6 months of therapy, the spleen response was detected in 140 (50%) patients, and symptoms response in 241 patients (76%). Multivariable analysis identified leukocytosis <25 G/L (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.12-3.88, P = .0200), and reticulin fibrosis MF 1 (OR 2.22, 95%CI: 1.11-4.46, P = .0249) contributed to better spleen response. The time interval between MF diagnosis and ruxolitinib administration shorter than 3 months, and platelets ≥150 G/L (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.83, P = .0466) influenced symptoms response.ConclusionEstablishing predictive factors for ruxolitinib response is particularly important given the potential for new therapies in MF. In patients with a low likelihood of responding to ruxolitinib, using other JAK inhibitors or adding a drug with a different mechanism of action to ruxolitinib may be of clinical benefit.     

Disease and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With a Clinical Diagnosis of Myelofibrosis Enrolled in the MOST Study

BackgroundClinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with lower-risk myelofibrosis (MF) are not well described. This analysis from the MOST (NCT02953704) assessed the demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with the clinical diagnosis of lower-risk MF at enrollment.Patients and MethodsMOST is an ongoing, prospective, observational study in patients with clinical diagnoses of MF or essential thrombocythemia enrolled at clinical practices throughout the United States. Patients included in the MF cohort (≥18 years of age) had low-risk MF by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System or intermediate-1 (INT-1) risk MF (by age >65 years only) at enrollment. Patient data were entered into an electronic case report form during usual-care visits over a planned 36 month observation period.ResultsTwo hundred five patients were eligible for this analysis (low risk, n = 85; INT-1 risk, n = 120; median age, 68 years [range, 35–88]); 166 patients (81.0%) had mutation testing results available. The median time from MF diagnosis to enrollment was 1.8 years. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were below the normal range in 50.5% and 48.7% of patients, respectively. Nearly all (98.0%) patients had comorbid conditions, most commonly hypertension (49.8%). Fatigue was the most common physician-reported MF symptom (30.7%). At enrollment, 55.6% of patients were receiving MF-directed monotherapy, most frequently hydroxyurea (46.5%) or ruxolitinib (40.4%).ConclusionFuture longitudinal analyses of data from MOST will help identify unmet needs and characterize how patients with lower-risk MF are managed throughout the disease course.     

Phase 1/2 Study of the Pan-PIM Kinase Inhibitor INCB053914 Alone or in Combination With Standard-of-Care Agents in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

BackgroundThe Proviral Integration site of Moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) kinases are implicated in tumorigenesis; the pan-PIM kinase inhibitor, INCB053914, demonstrated antitumor activity in hematologic malignancy preclinical models.Patients and MethodsThis phase 1/2 study evaluated oral INCB053914 alone or combined with standard-of-care agents for advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02587598). In Parts 1/2 (monotherapy), patients (≥18 years) had acute leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm, myelofibrosis (MF), multiple myeloma, or lymphoproliferative neoplasms. In Parts 3/4 (combination therapy), patients had relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed (≥65 years, unfit for intensive chemotherapy) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MF with suboptimal ruxolitinib response.ResultsParts 1/2 (n = 58): 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), most commonly aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase-elevated (AST/ALT; each n = 4). Fifty-seven patients (98.3%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly ALT-elevated and fatigue (36.2% each); 48 (82.8%) had grade ≥3 TEAEs, most commonly anemia (31.0%); 8 (13.8%) had grade ≥3 ALT/AST-elevated TEAEs. Parts 3/4 (n = 39): for INCB053914 + cytarabine (AML; n = 6), 2 patients experienced DLTs (grade 3 maculopapular rash, n = 1; grade 3 ALT-elevated and grade 4 hypophosphatemia, n = 1); for INCB053914 + azacitidine (AML; n = 16), 1 patient experienced a DLT (grade 3 maculopapular rash). Two complete responses were observed (1 with incomplete count recovery). For INCB053914 + ruxolitinib (MF; n = 17), no DLTs occurred; 3 patients achieved best reduction of >25% spleen volume at week 12 or 24.ConclusionINCB053914 was generally well tolerated as monotherapy and in combinations; TEAEs were most commonly ALT/AST-elevated. Limited responses were observed with combinations. Future studies are needed to identify rational, effective combination strategies.     

The Effect of Treatment Sequence on Overall Survival for Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

IntroductionWe aimed to evaluate the treatment sequence for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in real-world practice and compare overall survival in each sequential therapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 146 patients with mCRPC who were initially treated with androgen deprivation therapy as metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer in 14 hospitals between January 2010 and March 2019. The agents for the sequential therapy included new androgen receptor-targeted agents (ART: abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide), docetaxel, and/or cabazitaxel. We evaluated the treatment sequence for mCRPC and the effect of sequence patterns on overall survival.ResultsThe median age was 71 years. A total of 35 patients received ART-ART, 33 received ART-docetaxel, 68 received docetaxel-ART, and 10 received docetaxel-cabazitaxel sequences. The most prescribed treatment sequence was docetaxel-ART (47%), followed by ART-ART (24%). Overall survival calculated from the initial diagnosis reached 83, 57, 79, and 37 months in the ART-ART, ART-docetaxel, docetaxel-ART, and docetaxel-cabazitaxel, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed no significant difference in overall survival between the first-line ART (n = 68) and first-line docetaxel (n = 78) therapies (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; P = .530), between the ART-ART (n = 35) and docetaxel-mixed (n = 111) sequences (HR, 0.82; P = .650), and between the first-line abiraterone (n = 32) and first-line enzalutamide (n = 36) sequences (HR, 1.58; P = .384).ConclusionThe most prescribed treatment sequence was docetaxel followed by ART. No significant difference was observed in overall survival among the treatment sequences in real-world practice.     

Sequential Targeted Therapy After Pazopanib Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Efficacy and Toxicity

Introduction/BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in whom first-line therapies have failed might derive clinical benefit with sequential targeted agents. Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of subsequent therapies after disease progression during pazopanib therapy.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC who received subsequent systemic treatment after pazopanib treatment failure were identified across 7 institutions. Pazopanib was given as first-line therapy in 28 patients and after cytokines therapy in 7 patients. Clinical outcome and toxicity analyses of 2 sequential treatment options (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor [mTORi]) is presented.ResultsSubsequent therapy was anti-VEGF in 22 patients and mTORi in 13. One patient who received bevacizumab and temsirolimus combination was excluded. VEGF-targeted therapies included sorafenib (n = 10), sunitinib (n = 3), bevacizumab (n = 2), cediranib (n = 4) and cabozantinib (n = 3). Patients treated with mTORi received everolimus. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months from the start of subsequent therapy with anti-VEGF and 2.4 months with mTORi (P = .009). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (P = .68). Clinical benefit (including partial response and stable disease) on subsequent therapy was observed in 15 patients (64%) and 4 patients (31%) of anti–VEGF- and everolimus-treated patients, respectively (P = .021).ConclusionIn this retrospective study, targeting VEGF was an effective strategy after disease progression during pazopanib treatment, although OS was not different among patients treated with VEGF or mTORi.     

Real-World Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Treatment for Polycythemia Vera

IntroductionRuxolitinib is approved for the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV) with hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance. Approval was based on the phase III RESPONSE trial, which demonstrated efficacy in a highly selected patient population.Materials and MethodsTo characterize the tolerability and outcomes of ruxolitinib outside of a clinical trial, we performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of patients with PV treated with ruxolitinib at 11 participating sites across the United States. Outcomes of interest included change in phlebotomy requirements after starting ruxolitinib and spleen response, as these were included in the primary composite outcome in the RESPONSE trial.ResultsOne hundred twenty-six patients met eligibility criteria, and the median duration of follow-up was 22.4 months (range, 0-63.0 months). At 32 weeks after starting ruxolitinib, the percentage of patients who received at least 1 phlebotomy was significantly decreased compared with before ruxolitinib (37% vs. 56%; relative risk [RR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.84; P < .001). Phlebotomy requirements were similarly decreased in patients who had received at least 3 phlebotomies prior to ruxolitinib initiation (28% vs. 17%; RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.13-2.40; P < .01). Resolution of palpable splenomegaly was also documented (48% vs. 20%; RR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.70-3.53; P < .0001). A total of 9.5% of patients discontinued ruxolitinib owing to treatment-emergent adverse events, and 81.7% of patients were receiving ruxolitinib at last known follow-up.ConclusionThese real-world results are similar to those reported from the RESPONSE trial, although additional follow-up is necessary to assess long-term outcomes and potential for late-onset toxicity.     

Molecular Biomarkers of Disease Outcomes and Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers

IntroductionPreferred first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer is osimertinib, yet it is not known whether patient outcomes may be improved by identifying and intervening on molecular markers associated with therapeutic resistance.MethodsAll patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 327) were identified. Available pretreatment and postprogression tumor samples underwent targeted gene panel sequencing and mutational signature analysis using SigMA algorithm. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsUsing multivariate analysis, baseline atypical EGFR (median PFS = 5.8 mo, p < 0.001) and concurrent TP53/RB1 alterations (median PFS = 10.5 mo, p = 0.015) were associated with shorter PFS on first-line osimertinib. Of 95 patients with postprogression biopsies, acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 52% (off-target, n = 24; histologic transformation, n = 14; on-target, n = 12), with MET amplification (n = 9), small cell lung transformation (n = 7), and acquired EGFR amplification (n = 7), the most frequently identified mechanisms. Although there was no difference in postprogression survival on the basis of identified resistance (p = 0.07), patients with subsequent second-line therapy tailored to postprogression biopsy results had improved postprogression survival (hazard ratio = 0.09, p = 0.006). The paired postprogression tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.008) and further dominant APOBEC mutational signatures (p = 0.07) compared with the pretreatment samples.ConclusionsPatients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib have improved survival with treatment adaptation on the basis of identified mechanisms of resistance at time of progression using tissue-based genomic analysis. Further survival gains may be achieved using risk-based treatment adaptation of pretreatment genomic alterations.     

Limited Utility of Surveillance Imaging for Detecting Disease Relapse in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete Remission

IntroductionSurveillance imaging with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT) is commonly used in practice in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who are in remission after front-line therapies. We aimed to determine the utility of routine imaging for detecting first relapse in patients with NHL in complete remission (CR) after first-line therapies.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with NHL who achieved CR after first-line therapies and then subsequently had disease relapse. We evaluated whether the relapse was detected solely by surveillance CT or PET/CT or by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination findings, or both. Subgroup analysis was performed on baseline histologic type (indolent vs. aggressive NHL). Data were also collected to determine the cost of surveillance PET/CT and the number of additional diagnostic imaging procedures, invasive procedures, and iatrogenic complications directly resulting from an abnormality detected on a surveillance scan.ResultsOne hundred sixty-three patients with first relapse of NHL between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were included. The majority of the relapses were detected by patient-reported symptoms or physical examination, or both, as opposed to surveillance imaging (77.9% [n = 127] vs. 22.1% [n = 36]; P < .0001). There was no overall survival difference between the 2 groups (P = .66). Patient-reported symptoms led to the detection of the majority of relapses in aggressive (85.7% [n = 72] vs. 14.3% [n = 12]; P < .0001) as well as indolent NHL (69.6% [n = 55] vs. 30.4% [n = 24]; P = .0007). Surveillance PET/CT contributed to more than 75% of follow-up health care costs in the first 2 years of monitoring for relapse. The surveillance imaging group had 1 reported case of iatrogenic pneumothorax.ConclusionOur retrospective analysis suggests that there is a limited role for surveillance imaging by CT or PET/CT in detecting first relapse in NHL. There was no difference in survival outcomes between the 2 groups in our study.     

Effect of t (11;14) Abnormality on Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry

BackgroundThe t (11;14) (q13;32) translocation [t (11;14)] is present in ∼20% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), but studies examining its prognostic ability have yielded divergent results, and data are lacking on outcomes from first-line therapy.Patients and MethodsData from the Connect MM Registry, a large US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with NDMM were used to examine the effect of t (11;14) status on first-line therapy outcomes in the Overall population (n = 1574) and race groups (African American [AA] vs. non-African American [NAA]).ResultsBaseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with (n = 378) and without (n = 1196) t (11;14). Prevalence of t (11;14) was similar by race (AA, 27%; NAA, 24%). In the overall population, regardless of first-line therapy, t (11;14) status did not affect progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.7675) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .9417). AA patients with t (11;14) had higher likelihood of death (Nominal Cox regression P = .0298) vs. patients without t (11;14).ConclusionsAcknowledging observational study and inferential limitations, this exploratory analysis of a predominantly community-based population suggests that t (11;14) is a neutral prognostic factor in the general MM population but may be a negative factor for overall survival in AA patients.     

Efficacy of Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Elderly Patient Population

Introduction/BackgroundTargeted therapy has become the mainstay of treatment for mRCC. The efficacy of this therapy in the older population is poorly understood.Patients and MethodsData from patients with mRCC treated with first-line anti-VEGF therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 12 centers. Patient characteristics, data on second-line therapy, and outcomes including treatment duration and overall survival, were evaluated using summary statistics and multivariate analysis.ResultsAll patients (n = 1381) were treated with front-line targeted therapy; 144 (10%) were 75 years old or older. Six patients (4%) were favorable risk, 99 patients (69%) intermediate risk, and 39 patients (27%) poor risk according to Heng Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009 prognostic factors. The initial treatment for those ≥ 75 years of age was sunitinib (n = 98), sorafenib (n = 35), bevacizumab (n = 7), and AZD217 (n = 4). Twenty-three percent of older patients and 39% of the younger patients went on to receive second-line therapy (P < .0001). The overall response rate, median treatment duration, and overall survival for the older versus younger group were 18% versus 25% (P = .0975), 5.5 months versus 7.5 months (P = .1388), and 16.8 months versus 19.7 months (P = .3321), respectively. When adjusted for poor prognostic factors, age 75 years and older was not found to be associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.781-1.285) or shorter treatment duration (HR, 1.018; 95% CI, 0.827-1.252). The retrospective study design was the primary limitation.ConclusionThe use of advanced age as a selection criterion for targeted therapy requires further study, with data suggesting no clinically meaningful differences in overall response rate, treatment duration, and overall survival between older and younger age groups.     

Clinical Outcome With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous EGFR Wild-Type Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Segregated According to KRAS Mutation Status

BackgroundWe hypothesized that KRAS mutations function as a marker of poor sensitivity to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous EGFR wild-type (WT) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsConsecutive advanced nonsquamous EGFR WT NSCLCs treated at the Medical Oncology of Perugia with simultaneous assessment of KRAS mutation status were eligible. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene status was known in roughly half of the patients who had KRAS WT.ResultsTwo hundred four patients were included. Among them, the 77 individuals carrying a KRAS-mutant phenotype experienced a significantly inferior outcome in terms of response rate (P = .04), disease control rate (P = .05), and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .05) compared with the EGFR WT/KRAS WT population. The association between KRAS mutation and shorter PFS remained statistically significant at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45). In addition, patients with KRAS mutations reported a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared with patients with EGFR WT/KRAS WT/ALK negativity (n = 64) (P = .02). Among patients with KRAS mutations, those harboring a mutation at codon 13 (n = 12) performed worse than those with a mutation at codon 12 (n = 62) in terms of both PFS and OS (P = .09 for both).ConclusionKRAS mutation appears to negatively affect sensitivity to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous EGFR WT NSCLC. Studies on larger case series are needed to address differences in clinical outcome according to the type of mutation.     

Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Generic Imatinib and Branded Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With a Consideration of Socioeconomic Characteristics: A Retrospective Study From a Single Center

IntroductionTo compare the efficacy and safety of generic and branded imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP), we retrospectively reviewed data from patients CML-CP who received generic or branded imatinib.Patients and MethodsA propensity score matching (PSM) study was performed. A Cox regression model was used to identify factors associated with responses and outcomes.ResultsFour hundred forty-two adults receiving generic imatinib (n = 236) or Glivec (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland; n = 206) were included. There were more patients with rural household registration (P < .001), lower education level (P < .001), divorced or widowed status (P = .009), higher white blood cell counts (P = .019), splenomegaly (P < .001), and longer intervals from diagnosis to imatinib initiation (P = .033) in the generic cohort. During the follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in the 4-year probabilities of achieving a complete cytogenetic response (97.0% vs. 97.3%; P = .736), major molecular response (87.8% vs. 90.1%; P = .113), and molecular response^4.5 (32.5% vs. 38.8%; P = .186), as well as failure-free survival (77.3% vs. 81.4%; P = .313), progression-free survival (94.4% vs. 95.8%; P = .489), and overall survival (96.8% vs. 98.3%; P = .088). Multivariate analyses showed that the drug type was not associated with responses and outcomes. After the PSM procedure, 177 pairs of patients with comparable baseline characteristics were reanalyzed. Multivariate analyses confirmed that generic or branded imatinib used as first-line therapy was not associated with either responses or outcomes.ConclusionSociodemographic characteristics might influence the tyrosine kinase inhibitor that patients chose. Generic and branded imatinib as first-line therapy had comparable efficacy and safety in CML-CP patients.     

Clinical Significance of Bone Marrow Blast Percentage in Patients With Myelofibrosis and the Effect of Ruxolitinib Therapy

BackgroundThe effect of bone marrow (BM) blasts on the outcome of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is poorly understood, unless they are ≥ 10% and represent a more aggressive accelerated phase. Similarly, the role of the JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib (RUX), has not been assessed in correlation with BM blasts.Patients and MethodsHerein, we present clinical characteristics and outcomes of 1412 patients with MF stratified by BM blasts and therapy.ResultsSeven percent and 4% of patients had 5% to 9% and ≥ 10% BM blasts, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients were treated with RUX throughout their disease course. Overall survival (OS) differed among patients with 0% to 1%, 2% to 4%, and 5% to 9% BM blasts, with median OS of 64, 48, and 22 months, respectively (P < .001). Patients with 5% to 9% BM blasts had similar OS as patients with ≥ 10% BM blasts (22 vs. 14 months; P = .73). All patients with < 10% blasts who were treated with RUX showed superior OS to patients who did not receive RUX.ConclusionsOur results indicate that patients with MF with ≥ 5% BM blasts represent a high-risk group with adverse clinical characteristics and inferior outcome. However, they still appear to derive substantial survival benefit from therapy with RUX.     

Impact of Exon 19 Deletion Subtypes in EGFR-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundCommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with exon 19 deletions being associated with better outcome compared to L858R mutations. We aimed to investigate the impact of different exon 19 deletions on patient outcome in EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line TKIs.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, 106 patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions and treated with first-line TKIs were included. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), the secondary end point progression-free survival (PFS). Analyses were performed by grouping exon 19 deletions according to 2 models: we compared different type of deletion (delE746_A750 vs. deletions other than delE746-A750, defined as “uncommon”) or different starting codon of deletion (E746 vs. L747).ResultsThe frequency of uncommon deletions of exon 19 was 36%. When delE746_A750 (n = 68) was compared to the other deletions in exon 19 (n = 38), no differences were found, either in terms of OS (P = .65) or PFS (P = .65). Similarly, no difference in OS (P = .74) or PFS (P = .99) emerged when comparing the E746 group (n = 81) to the L747 group (n = 25). On multivariate analysis including clinical characteristics and type of deletions (delE746_A750 vs. uncommon deletions or E746 vs. L747), only the presence of brain metastases at diagnosis or during TKI treatment was associated with shorter PFS but not with worse OS.ConclusionDifferent exon 19 deletions are equally sensitive to first-line EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.     

dNLR-Based Score Predicting Overall Survival Benefit for The Addition of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy to Pembrolizumab in Advanced NSCLC With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥50%

Introduction: Both pembrolizumab (P) as a monotherapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (PCT) represent standard first-line treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS)≥50%. No predictive biomarkers exist to guide treatment decisions.Methods: 423 consecutive patients with EGFR/ALK/ROS1-wild-type PD-L1 TPS≥50% aNSCLC receiving P (n = 302) or PCT (n = 121) as a first-line treatment were identified in the electronic databases of 5 Israeli cancer centers. Overall survival (OS, months [mo]) was assessed in correlation with blood biomarkers (BB: NLR, dNLR, PLR, SII, LIPI, ALI); a predictive score was developed.Results: In the propensity score matching analysis (n = 236; 118 patients in each group matched for age, sex and ECOG PS), mOS was 17.2mo (95% CI, 13.2-36.5) and 21.3mo (95% CI, 14.8-NR) in groups P and PCT, respectively (P = .44). In group P, NLR, dNLR, PLR, LIPI, and ALI significantly correlated with OS in uni- and multivariate COX regression analyses (P < .05), whereas in group PCT, none of the BB demonstrated a significant correlation. A predictive score was developed (each parameter receiving one point): age≥65, female sex, never-smoking status, adenocarcinoma histology, dNLR≥3. In patients with predictive score 3-5, OS was significantly longer with PCT as compared to P: mOS NR (95% CI, 15.3-NR) and 8.7mo (95% CI, 5.8-13.7) (P = .0005), while OS didn't differ significantly in patients with predictive score 0-2 (P = .61).Conclusion: With the limitations of the retrospective analysis, the proposed dNLR-based score appears to predict OS with P and PCT.     

Practical Measures of Clinical Benefit With Ruxolitinib Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of COMFORT-I

BackgroundThe phase III COMFORT (Controlled Myelofibrosis Study With Oral JAK inhibitor Treatment)-I and COMFORT-II trials in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) showed that ruxolitinib was superior to placebo and best available therapy, respectively, for improvements in spleen volume, MF-related symptoms, and overall survival (OS). However, patients managed in community settings might not have access to the methods used in the COMFORT trials. In this exploratory analysis we summarize efficacy findings of COMFORT-I using practical, community-oriented measures of patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsIn this post hoc analysis of data from COMFORT-I we evaluated changes from baseline to week 12 in spleen size (palpable length and volume), patient-reported outcomes (Patient Global Impression of Change; Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System Fatigue Scale), body weight, and serum albumin levels in 5 subgroups of ruxolitinib-treated patients on the basis of week 12 spleen length changes from baseline: (1-4) ≥ 50%, 25% to < 50%, 10% to < 25%, or < 10% reduction; and (5) worsening. OS was evaluated in ruxolitinib-treated patients with week 12 spleen length reductions from baseline ≥ 50%, 25% to < 50%, or < 25% (including worsening).ResultsIn all spleen length subgroups, including patients with worsening spleen length at week 12, ruxolitinib (n = 150) was associated with improvements in spleen volume, patient-reported symptom burden, body weight, and serum albumin levels. Greater reductions in spleen length were associated with prolonged OS.ConclusionA variety of assessment methods beyond palpable spleen length that are easily accessible in the community setting might be useful in evaluating the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib over time in patients with MF.