Efficacy of First-line Chemotherapy Affects the Second-Line Setting Response in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for the majority of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations and many receive therapies beyond first-line. Secondline chemotherapy has been disappointing both in terms of response rate and survival and we know relatively little about the prognostic factors. Materials and Methods: One thousand and eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy after progression were reviewed in Shanghai PulmonaryHospital, China, from September 2005 to July 2010. We analyzed the effects of potential prognostic factors on the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy (overall response rate, ORR; progression free survival, PFS; overall survival, OS). Results: The response and progression free survival of first-line chemotherapy affects the ORR, PFS and OS of second-line chemotherapy (ORR: CR/PR 15.4%, SD 10.1%, PD2.3%, p<0.001; PFS: CR/PR 3.80 months, SD 2.77 months, PD 2.03 months, p<0.001; OS: CR/PR 11.60 months, SD 10.33 months, PD 6.57 months, p=0.578, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, better response to first-line therapy (CR/PR: HR=0.751, p=0.002; SD: HR=0.781, p=0.021) and progression within 3-6 months (HR=0.626, p<0.001), together with adenocarcinoma (HR=0.815, p=0.017), without liver metastasis (HR=0.541, p=0.001), never-smoker(HR=0.772, p=0.001), and ECOG PS 0-1 (HR=0.745, p=0.021) were predictors for good OS following secondline chemotherapy. Conclusions: Patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy had a better outcome after second-line therapy for advanced NSCLC, and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, period of progression, histology, liver metastasis, smoking status and ECOG PS were independent prognostic factors for OS.     

The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

There are many active drugs to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who progress through their first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor. Many clinicians choose a second-line VEGF inhibitor based on the type of response to first-line VEGF inhibitor, without data supporting this practice. This study was conducted to determine the association of response to second-line VEGF inhibitor with response to first-line VEGF inhibitor. All mRCC patients in participating centers of the International mRCC Database Consortium who were treated from January 2004 through June 2011 with a second-line VEGF inhibitor after failure of a different first-line VEGF inhibitor were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome is objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary outcome is progression-free survival (PFS) in each line of therapy. Of 1,602 total database patients, 464 patients received a first- and second-line VEGF inhibitor. The ORR to first-line therapy was 22 %, and the ORR to second-line therapy was 11 %. The ORR to second-line therapy was not different among patients achieving partial response versus stable disease versus progressive disease to first-line therapy (14 % vs. 10 % vs. 11 %, respectively; chi-squared trend test p?=?0.17). The median PFS on first-line VEGF-targeted therapy was 7.5 months (95 % CI, 6.6–8.1), and the median PFS on second-line VEGF inhibitor was 3.9 months (95 % CI, 3.6–4.5). There was no correlation between first-line and second-line PFS (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.025; p?=?0.59). The clinical response to a second-line VEGF inhibitor is not dependent on response to the first-line VEGF-inhibitor. Further studies are needed to define clinical parameters that predict response to second-line therapy to optimize the sequence of VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic RCC patients.     

Significant efficacy of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine± rituximab in the treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL): extended follow-up

BackgroundSplenic marginal zone lymphoma with or without villous lymphocytes (SLVL/SMZL) is an indolent lymphoma that typically affects elderly patients and that has a median survival >10 years. It presents with marked splenomegaly. Treatment is required in symptomatic cases. Splenectomy remains one of the first-line options in patients fit for surgery. The best pharmacological strategy has not yet been identified for poor surgical risk cases. Among different possible chemotherapeutic approaches, purine analogs, alone or in association with Rituximab, seem to be a valid therapeutic choice.Patients and methodsFifty SMZL patients were treated with Cladribine ± anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.ResultsForty-seven of 50 patients were evaluable for response. ORR was 87%: 24 of 47 patients (51%) achieved a complete hematological response (CR), 17 of 47 (36%) a partial response (PR) and 6 (13%) resulted unresponsive. Interestingly, 15 of 24 cases (62%) in CR achieved also a molecular remission. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 7 of 41 responsive cases relapsed and the 5-year PFS was 80%.ConclusionsThese data confirm the efficacy of this schedule emphasizing the impact of minimal residual disease even in the outcome of SMZL patients.     

索拉非尼治疗转移性肾癌的疗效与安全性观察

目的:评估63例转移性肾细胞癌（metastatic renal cell carcinoma,mRCC）患者服用索拉非尼的疗效及安全性。方法:前瞻性观察2010年6月至2018年6月就诊于西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科及中华慈善总会索拉非尼援助赠药项目mRCC患者共计71例,其中63例可评价疗效及安全性。使用SPSS 18.0 软件进行K-M单因素生存分析,所得阳性因素导入COX回归模型进行多因素分析,明确影响索拉非尼治疗mRCC疗效的因素。结果:63例可评价mRCC患者中,无CR患者,PR 18例,SD 22例,PD 23例,ORR为28.57%（18/63）,DCR为63.49%（40/63）;中位PFS为14月（3~51月）,中位OS为29月（6~69月）;所有不良反应均可控或随剂量减少而降低。索拉非尼作为mRCC一线治疗者39例,二线及以上治疗者24例。一线和二线及以上治疗的ORR及DCR均无统计学差异,且中位PFS分别为24月（4~51月）和13月（3~42月）（P=0.021）。COX回归分析示,索拉菲尼是否为一线治疗是影响PFS的独立危险因素（P=0.030）。结论:索拉非尼治疗mRCC疗效确切,不良反应较少,并且是否为一线治疗是影响患者中位PFS的独立预测因素。     

Long remissions in hairy cell leukemia with purine analogs: a report of 219 patients with a median follow-up of 12.5 years

BACKGROUND: Both pentostatin and cladribine have efficacy in hairy cell leukemia (HCL), but it is not known which agent achieves better results. METHODS: We reviewed a series of 219 patients with HCL, with median follow-up from diagnosis of 12.5 years (range 1.0 -34.6 yrs), treated with either pentostatin (n = 185) or cladribine (n = 34), to compare these agents and assess the potential for cure. RESULTS: Overall response to pentostatin was 96% with a complete response (CR) in 81% and a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 years. Response to first-line cladribine was 100% with a CR in 82% and DFS of 11+ years. The relapse rates at 5 years and 10 years were 24% and 42%, respectively, with pentostatin, and 33% and 48% with cladribine. Survival at 10 years was respectively 96% and 100%. CR rates decreased with each sequential relapse through 69% to 45% (P < or = 0.001). Patients achieving CR after first-line treatment had a significantly longer DFS (P = 0.00007) than those achieving a partial response; a similar result was seen after second-line therapy (P = 0.00001). DFS also declined with sequential treatment (P = 0.00005). CONCLUSION: We have shown equivalent efficacies for both agents in the treatment of HCL, with DFS showing no plateau. True cure in HCL remains elusive, but the addition of monoclonal antibodies may be beneficial. Our results suggest that achieving CR should remain the main goal of treatment.     

Autologous stem-cell transplantation after second-line brentuximab vedotin in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BackgroundWe previously demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin (BV) used as second-line therapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is a tolerable and effective bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Here, we report the post-AHCT outcomes of patients treated with second-line standard/fixed-dose BV and an additional cohort of patients where positron-emission tomography adapted dose-escalation of second-line BV was utilized.Patients and methodsPatients on the dose-escalation cohort received 1.8 mg/kg of BV intravenously every 3 weeks for two cycles. Patients in complete remission (CR) after two cycles received two additional cycles of BV at 1.8 mg/kg, while patients with stable disease or partial response were escalated to 2.4 mg/kg for two cycles. All patients, regardless of treatment cohort, proceeded directly to AHCT or received additional pre-AHCT therapy at the discretion of the treating physician based on remission status after second-line BV.ResultsOf the 20 patients enrolled to the BV dose-escalation cohort, 8 patients underwent BV dose-escalation. BV escalation was well-tolerated, but no patients who were escalated converted to CR. Of 56 evaluable patients treated across cohorts, the overall response rate (ORR) to second-line BV was 75% with 43% CR. Twenty-eight (50%) patients proceeded directly to AHCT without post-BV chemotherapy, and a total of 50 patients proceeded to AHCT. Thirteen patients received consolidative post-AHCT therapy with either radiation, BV, or a PD-1 inhibitor. After AHCT, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 67% and 93%, respectively. The 2-year PFS among patients in CR at the time of AHCT (n = 37) was 71% compared with 54% in patients not in CR (p = 0.12). The 2-year PFS in patients who proceeded to AHCT directly after receiving BV alone was 77%.ConclusionsSecond-line BV is an effective bridge to AHCT that produces responses of sufficient depth to provide durable remission in conjunction with AHCT (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01393717).     

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the phase II BEVACOLOR study

BackgroundThis prospective phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsPatients with mCRC who progressed or relapsed after first-line oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based treatment received bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg/week plus chemotherapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease-control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.ResultsFifty-three patients (66% men; median age, 62 years old) received second-line bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; 57%), folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 26%), irinotecan (15%), or capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI; 2%). The DCR was 87% (95% CI, 77%-97%); ORR was 32% (95% CI, 19%-46%). Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.8 months) and median OS 19.3 months, (95% CI, 14.2-25.1 months).The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (15%), asthenia, and vomiting (9% each). Five patients (9%) had grade 3/4 targeted toxicities: grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), grade 3 venous thromboembolism (n = 2), and grade 4 arterial thromboembolism (n = 1). None of these events led to death during the study.ConclusionBevacizumab plus standard second-line chemotherapy is highly active in patients with mCRC and has an acceptable safety profile.     

Outcomes With First-line PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Single Institution Experience

BackgroundFirst-line PD-inhibition in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer represents a novel clinical setting, with uncertainty concerning second-line outcomes. Specifying second-line treatment and outcomes will provide guidance in this new sequence. We performed a retrospective chart review to document the outcomes of these patients treated at our institution.Patients and MethodsOur cohort consisted of 43 patients with advanced urothelial cancer receiving first-line checkpoint inhibition. Baseline factors, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, treatments, and outcomes during and beyond the first line were obtained. Response was scored using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 criteria. Log rank tests were used to compare outcomes in prognostic subgroups, and outcome associations with PD-L1 status were analyzed with Fisher exact tests.ResultsA total of 43 patients received first-line atezolizumab or pembrolizumab from June 2014 until June 2018. The median age was 76.8 years, and the population was 74% male, with 60% having visceral metastases. Reasons for cisplatin ineligibility were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2%, 30%; renal insufficiency, 44%, and both, 21%. First-line objective response rate (ORR) was 30%, and complete response was 14%. The median overall survival was 11.7 months. Of 29 patients progressing, 17 received second-line treatment (most commonly, gemcitabine/carboplatin [10 patients]). The second-line response rate was 33%, and the ORR was 11%. The second-line median overall survival was 6.2 months. No association was found between PD-L1 status and outcomes.ConclusionOutcomes with first-line immunotherapy are consistent with historical outcomes. The ORR after first-line checkpoint inhibition falls short of historical comparators; however, the response rate compares favorably to those of chemotherapies used in previous second-line regimens. The older age and poorer performance status may have contributed to second-line outcomes.     

Abiraterone Followed by Enzalutamide Versus Enzalutamide Followed by Abiraterone in Chemotherapy-naive Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Background

Abiraterone (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZA) are increasingly being used in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer owing to efficacy and favorable toxicity. However, the order in which they should be administered has not been determined.

New agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Opinion statement For many years, alkylating agents, especially chlorambucil, have been considered the drugs of choice for first-line treatment of progressive and symptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). More recently, treatment approaches have included purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), fludarabine or cladribine (2-CdA), and monoclonal anti-bodies (MoAbs). PNAs are highly active in patients with CLL, previously treated and untreated. Significantly higher overall response and complete response in patients treated initially with fludarabine or 2-CdA than in those treated with chlorambucil- or cyclophosphamide-based combination regimens have been recently confirmed in prospective, randomized trials. However, the median survival times do not differ among the patients treated with PNA and alkylating agents. The MoAbs directed against CD52 antigen (alemtuzumab) and CD20 antigen (rituximab) also demonstrate significant activity in CLL and should be used in patients with disease that is refrac-tory to PNAs. Combination therapies with PNAs and cyclophosphamide, and especially with rituximab, are more active than monotherapy with PNAs in regard to response rate and possible survival. Because most patients are older and there is no survival time advantage for alkylating agents or PNA therapies, we recommend chlorambucil as the first-line treatment, with PNAs for consideration as the second-line therapy. PNAs alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and rituximab as first-line treatment are an option in younger patients, who may be candidates for consolidation therapy with alemtuzumab and/or stem cell transplantation. Alemtuzumab may be an effective treatment for patients refractory to PNAs. Several biological parameters have been gaining increasing importance to evaluate the prognosis of patients with CLL and define optimal therapeutic strategy. Moreover, novel therapies are being evalu-ated, especially in patients refractory to PNAs, including those targeting the anti-apoptotic bcl-2 family of proteins and receptors, vaccines, and allogenic stem cell transplantation, especially after nonmyeloablative chemotherapy.     

T-DM1 Efficacy in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After a Taxane Plus Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab: An Italian Multicenter Observational Study

BackgroundT-DM1 improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer progressing on prior trastuzumab plus a taxane. A paucity of data is available on T-DM1 efficacy after dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus a taxane, which represents the current first-line standard of care. The present study is a retrospective/prospective evaluation of the efficacy and activity of second-line T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab-based therapy.Patients and MethodsEligible patients were identified within the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 14/BIOMETA study, a retrospective/prospective multicenter study on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284581). We searched for patients who received second-line T-DM1 after taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab between November 15, 2013 and May 31, 2018. We calculated median PFS, median time to treatment failure (TTF), prolonged duration of therapy (PDT), objective response rate (ORR), and 1-year OS.ResultsOf 445 patients with HER2⁺ metastatic breast cancer, 77 were eligible for the analysis. At a median follow-up of 7 months, median PFS was 6.3 months (95% confidence intervals [CI], 4.8-7.7 months), and median TTF was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4-8.6 months). More than one-third of patients (37.6%; n = 29) experienced PDT with an ORR of 27.1%. At data cutoff, the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS was 82%.ConclusionsOur results show meaningful activity of T-DM1 after front-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and a taxane, with about 27% of patients having an objective response and 40% of patients achieving durable disease control.     

The role of rituximab in combination with pentostatin or cladribine for the treatment of recurrent/refractory hairy cell leukemia

BACKGROUND: The purine analogs pentostatin and cladribine have revolutionized the treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) with overall responses in greater than 85% of patients and a median progression-free survival of up to 15 years. They continue to be effective at second- and even third-line therapy; however, alternative treatments are needed for patients who are or have become refractory to these agents or whose remissions are shorter with each course of therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 8 patients who received pentostatin or cladribine combined concurrently (n = 6 patients) or sequentially (n = 2 patients) with rituximab at second-line therapy (n = 3 patients) and at subsequent lines of therapy (n = 5 patients). Results from a previously reported database of 219 patients with HCL (73 patients who received second-line therapy and 20 patients who received third-line therapy) were used as a historic control group against which to measure benefit. RESULTS: All 8 patients responded to therapy, with 7 complete responses (CRs) (87.5%) and minimal toxicity. All patients who had CRs were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD). At a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 5-39 months) 1 patient developed recurrent disease, and the estimated 2-year recurrence rate was 20% (0% after second-line therapy and 25% after subsequent lines of therapy). In the historic control group, the CR rates were 70% after second-line therapy and 45% after third-line therapy, and the recurrence rates at 2 years were 15% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of purine analogs with rituximab was safe and effective for patients with recurrent and/or refractory HCL, and the current results suggested an added benefit compared with standard treatment.     

Cladribine in hairy cell leukemia

Cladribine results in prolonged complete remissions in most patients wo have HCL. Several studies have indicated that patients who are in complete remission have survivals that are comparable to those of normal age-matched controls. HCL-related mortality is distinctly uncommon. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that cladribine treatment of HCL is curative because MRD is common in the bone marrows of complete responders. Response criteria for HCL include clinical, hematologic, and morphologic criteria, but do not include flow cytometry, immunohistochemical analysis, or molecular studies. More sensitive techniques have been used by Filleul and colleagues to detect MRD. The used clonoegenic probes from the hypervariable regions of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene and performed polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) on bone marrow biopsy specimens, All seven patients who were in morphologic complete remission after a single cladribine infusion were PCR positive. These data indicate that cladribine induces protracted remissions but is not necessarily curative. MRD can be detected in most patients when sensitive techniques are used. Persistence of immunohistochemical MRD may predict detected MRD remains to be studied in a large number of patients. Investigators from the University of Pisa in Italy have used a combination of cladribine and rituximab to eradicate MRD in patients who have HCL. Ten patients received treatment with a standard infusion of cladribine. Two patients achieved a complete remission, 6 patients achieved a partial remission, and 2 patients failed to respond. All were PCR positive for the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) gene product at the completion of cladribine treatment. All 10 patients had achieved a complete hematologic response 2 months after the completion of ritximab therapy. The curative nature of this treatment will require long-term follow-up. Cladribine represents a major therapeutic advance in the treatment of HCL. The prognosis of patients who have HCL has improved greatly with cladribine therapy. Future strategies should address combination therapy with purine analogs and monclonal antibodies. These strategies should address eradication of MRD in an attempt to develop a potentially curative combination treatment program.     

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4–14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6–49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1–10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5–21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5–82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7–27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.     

PAD及VAD样-T方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤126例效果比较

目的：探讨多发性骨髓瘤（MM）行 PAD 方案（硼替佐米、多柔比星、地塞米松）及 VAD 方案（长春新碱、多柔比星／多柔比星衍生物、地塞米松）联合沙利度胺（VAD 样-T 方案）治疗效果的差异。方法回顾性分析54例接受 VAD 样-T 方案及72例接受 PAD 方案治疗的 MM 患者的疗效,包括完全缓解（CR）率、非常好的部分缓解（VGPR）率、总有效率（ORR）、总生存（OS）、无进展生存（PFS）及不良反应发生情况。结果 PAD 组 CR 率高于 VAD 样-T 组,差异有统计学意义[31.5%（23／72）比9.3%（5／54）,χ2＝0.30,P＝0.002],但是 VGPR 率及 ORR 两组相比差异无统计学意义[16.7%（12／72）比16.6%（9／54）,P＝0.180;82.2%（65／72）比81.5%（44／54）,P＝0.190]。 PAD 组中位 PFS 时间长于 VAD 样-T 组[（38.2±2.2）个月比（28.0±7.6）个月,P＝0.017];PAD 组3年 PFS 率和5年 OS 率高于 VAD 样-T 组,但差异均无统计学意义（均 P＞0.05）。 PAD 组末梢神经损害发生率高于 VAD 样-T 组,差异有统计学意义[31.5%（23／72）比14.5%（8／54）,P＝0.03]。结论虽然 VAD 样-T 方案的 CR 率低于 PAD 方案,中位PFS 时间短于 PAD 方案,但 VGPR 率、ORR、3年 PFS 率、5年 OS 率与 PAD 方案相当,且相对安全,末梢神经损害的发生率相对较低。对于国内无法使用硼替佐米及骨髓移植的初发 MM 患者,可选择 VAD 样-T作为一线诱导化疗方案。     

Phase-II trial of combination treatment of interferon-α, cimetidine, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor (I-CCA therapy) for advanced renal cell carcinoma

We have recently reported favorable responses to a combination treatment comprising cimetidine, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and a renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In view of the potential synergistic effects of these three agents and interferon-α (I-CCA therapy), we conducted a phase-II trial to examine the efficacy and toxicity of I-CCA as first-line treatment. Fifty-one patients with advanced RCC received natural interferon-α (3-6 million U thrice/week) and cimetidine (800 mg), cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor meloxicam (10 mg), and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor candesartan (4 mg) or perindopril (4 mg) orally daily. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic categories were favorable, intermediate and poor in 10 (20%), 31 (61%) and 10 (20%) patients, respectively. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary end-points included clinical benefit, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median follow-up was 19 months. Complete response (CR) was observed in four patients (8%) and partial response in seven (14%), yielding an ORR of 22%. None of the four patients who achieved CR relapsed during the 16- to 81-month follow up. The ORR were 17% in the favorable- or intermediate-risk group and 40% in the poor-risk group. The other 24 patients (45%) had stable disease for at least 6 months, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 67%. The median PFS and OS were 12 and 30 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were never observed. The I-CCA therapy, providing favorable responses and low toxicity profiles, is worthy of further consideration as a first-line therapy for metastatic RCC.     

Clinical Factors Associated With Long-Term Benefit in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Axitinib: Real-World AXILONG Study

BackgroundAxitinib monotherapy obtained approval in pre-treated mRCC patients and recently in combination with pembrolizumab or avelumab in the first-line setting. However, patient profiles that may obtain increased benefit from this drug and its combinations still need to be identified.Patients and MethodsRetrospective multicentre analysis describing clinical characteristics associated with axitinib long-responder (LR) population by comparing two extreme-response sub-groups (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥9 months vs. disease progression/refractory patients [RP]). A multivariate logistic-regression model was used to analyse clinical factors. Efficacy and safety were also analysed.ResultsIn total, 157 patients who received axitinib in second or subsequent line were evaluated (91 LR and 66 RP). Older age at start of axitinib and haemoglobin levels > LLN were independent predictive factors for LR in multivariate analyses. In LR patients, median (m) PFS was 18.1 months, median overall survival was 36.0 months and objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5%. In 59 LR patients receiving axitinib in second-line, mPFS was 18.7 months, mOS was 44.8 months and ORR was 43.9%. mOS was significantly longer in second line compared to subsequent lines (44.8 vs. 26.5 months; P = .009). In LR vs. RP, mPFS with sunitinib in first-line was correlated with mPFS with axitinib in second-line (27.2 vs. 10.9 months P < .001). The safety profile was manageable and consistent with known data.ConclusionsThis study confirms the long-term benefits of axitinib in a selected population, helping clinicians to select the best sequential approach and patients who could obtain a greater benefit from axitinib.     

Randomized phase III trial of 2nd line gemcitabine and paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer: short-term versus prolonged treatment [German Association of Urological Oncology (AUO) trial AB 20/99]

BackgroundThe second-line chemotherapeutic treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) after failure of cisplatin-based first-line therapy needs to be improved. Based on encouraging phase II data of gemcitabine and paclitaxel (Taxol) (GP), this trial was designed to compare a short-term (arm A) versus a prolonged (arm B) second-line combination chemotherapy of GP.Patients and methodsOf 102 randomized patients, 96 were eligible for analysis. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR) and toxicity.ResultsNeither OS [arm A: 7.8 (95% CI: 4.2–11.4), arm B: 8.0 (95% CI: 4.9–11.1) months] and PFS [arm A: 4.0 (95% CI: 0–8.0), arm B: 3.1 (95% CI: 1.9–4.2) months] nor ORR (arm A: 37.5%, arm B: 41.5%) were significantly different. On prolonged treatment, more patients experienced severe anemia (arm A: 6.7% versus arm B: 26.7% grade III/IV anemia; P = 0.011). In six patients, treatment was stopped during the first cycle due to disease progression or toxicity. Two patients died due to treatment-related toxic effects.ConclusionDue to rapid tumor progression and toxicity at this dosage and schedule in a multicenter setting, it was not feasible to deliver a prolonged regimen. However, a high response rate of ∼40% makes GP a promising second-line treatment option for patients with metastatic UC.     

Pooled analysis of individual patient data from capecitabine monotherapy clinical trials in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

We assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine across treatment lines, and the impact of patient and disease characteristics on outcomes using data from phase II/III trials. Individual patient data were pooled from seven Roche/Genentech-led trials conducted from 1996 to 2008 where single-agent capecitabine was the test or control regimen for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Data were analyzed from 805 patients: 268 in the first-line metastatic setting and 537 in the second-line or later setting. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment lines. Patients receiving second-line or later versus first-line capecitabine had lower objective response rates (ORR: 19.0 vs. 25.0?%, respectively, odds ratio 0.70; 95?% CI: 0.5?C1.0) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: median 112.0?days [3.7?months] vs. 150.0?days [4.9?months]; p?<?0.0001) and overall survival (OS: median 396.0?days [13.0?months] vs. 666.0?days [21.9?months]; p?<?0.0001). In multivariate analysis by backward elimination, significantly improved ORR (p?=?0.0036), PFS (p?<?0.0001) and OS (p?<?0.0001) with capecitabine were demonstrated in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive versus both ER and PgR-negative tumors. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the most common adverse event (AE) in 63?% of patients. Overall, 7?% of patients discontinued and two patients (<1?%) died from treatment-related AEs. Significantly improved survival was observed in patients developing capecitabine-related HFS (p?<?0.0001 PFS/OS) or diarrhea (p?=?0.004 OS; p?=?0.0045 PFS) versus patients without these events. In this pooled analysis of individual patient data, first-line capecitabine was associated with improved ORR, PFS, and OS versus second or later lines. Multivariate analyses identified greater ORR, PFS, and OS with capecitabine in patients with ER and/or PgR-positive versus ER/PgR-negative tumors. Safety was in-line with previous phase III trials in MBC.