Prevalence and correlates of single and multiple unintentional non-fatal injuries among school-going adolescents in Liberia

ObjectiveThis investigation aims to report on single and multiple unintentional nonfatal injuries among in-school adolescents in Liberia.MethodsNationally representative cross-sectional data were statistically analysed from 2,744 adolescents (median age=18 years) that participated in the 2017 Liberia Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS).ResultsThe prevalence of single or multiple serious injuries (past 12 months) was 71.6% (31.8% once and 39.7% two or more times). Struck or hit by an object (10.6%), fall (9.0%), and motor vehicle crashes (8.6%) were the most frequent causes of injury, and cuts or open wounds (13.6%), fractures or dislocation (8.2%), and concussion (5.0%) were the most prevalent types of injury. In adjusted multinomial logistic regression analysis, experience of hunger (or food insecurity), passive smoking, frequent school truancy, psychological distress, and current cannabis use were associated with multiple and/or single injury. In addition, in unadjusted analysis, current tobacco use, ever drunk, ever amphetamine use, physically inactive and sedentary and walking and biking to school were associated with single and/or multiple injuries. In a separate multinomial logistic regression model, victims of physically assault, involvement in physical fighting, and bullying victimization were associated with both single and multiple injuries.ConclusionA high prevalence of unintentional single and multiple injuries was discovered and several factors were found that can be utilized in targeting programmes aimed at injury prevention among adolescents.     

How Common Are Civilian Blast Injuries in the National Trauma Databank,and What Are the Most Common Mechanisms and Characteristics of Associated Injuries?

BackgroundRecent military conflicts have produced substantial improvements in the care of service members who experience blast injuries. As conflicts draw down, it is important to preserve and improve skills gained in combat. It is unknown whether civilian blast injuries can serve as a surrogate for military blast trauma. To guide further research, it is crucial to understand the volume, severity, and distribution of civilian blast injury in the civilian population.Questions/purposes(1) What proportion of US trauma admissions are a result of blast injury? (2) What are the common mechanisms, and what is the demographic breakdown of civilian patients presenting to trauma centers after blast injuries? (3) What is the severity, and what are the characteristics of injuries sustained by civilian patients after blast injuries?MethodsWe queried the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank (NTDB), a national aggregation of trauma registry data which captures robust mechanism of injury and wounding pattern information, for any patient admitted for trauma and an initial mechanism of injury corresponding to a predefined list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 external cause of injury codes related to blast injuries and reported as a proportion of all trauma-related admissions. Mechanisms were categorized into similar groups, and data were collected regarding demographics as well as location and intentionality of blast (that is, unintentional, the result of assault, or self-inflicted). Patient injuries were characterized by ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis codes and sorted according to the body area affected and severity of injury, measured via the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The ISS is a measure of trauma severity, with scores ranging from 1 to 75 points based on injury severity, which is calculated according to injury scores in six separate body domains (head or neck, face, chest, abdomen or pelvis, extremities, external). A score of 1 represents a minor trauma to one region, while a score of 75 indicates injuries deemed nonsurvivable in one or more domains. Data were limited to trauma admissions in 2016.ResultsPatients injured by blast mechanisms represented 0.3% (2682 of 968,843) of patients in NTDB-participating trauma centers who were treated after a blast injury in the year 2016; 86% (2315 of 2682) of these patients were men, and the mean ± SD age was 38 ± 21 years. Blast injuries most commonly occurred after detonation of fireworks (29% [773 of 2682]) or explosion of gas or pressurized containers (27% [732 of 2682]). The most commonly injured area of the body was the upper extremity (33% [894 of 2682]), followed by the face (28% [747 of 2682]), lower extremity (11% [285 of 2682]), thorax (10% [280 of 2682]), and head (10% [259 of 2682]). Fifty-eight percent (1564 of 2682) of patients had at least one burn injury. A total of 2% (51 of 2682) of the injuries were fatal, with a mean ISS score of 6 ± 8; 23% (608 of 2682) of patients presented with injuries classified as severe (ISS > 8).ConclusionCivilian blast-associated injuries are not common, but they can be severe, and in many (though not all) respects they seem similar to those described in published case series of military blast victims. Key differences include age and gender (civilian injuries more commonly involve women and older patients than do those in military studies). The potential of civilian blast patient care as a surrogate for study and clinical experience for military surgeons in the interwar period—as recommended by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report—is supported by our preliminary results. Future interventions or training programs would likely need to rely on multisite or targeted partnerships to encounter appropriate numbers of patients with blast injuries.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, prognostic study.     

Emotional responses to unintentional and intentional traumatic injuries among urban black men: A qualitative study

PurposeThe burden of injuries is disproportionately concentrated among Black men in the United States. Previous studies suggest that the mental health effects of trauma may vary by the intentionality of the injury (intentional vs. unintentional), yet little is known about this experience among Black men. We explored the emotional responses to traumatic injuries in the context of injury intentionality among Black men in an urban area.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 74 Black men who were traumatically injured. The interviews took place three months after discharge from the hospital and they were audiotaped, transcribed, and de-identified. We used systematic thematic analysis to identify themes about post-trauma emotional responses to intentional and unintentional injuries.ResultsThe narratives of intentionally injured men revealed persistent exposure to neighborhood violence and their distrust of others including the people they knew and to whom they felt close. Survivors of unintentional injuries did not express a similar distrust of others. Our findings suggest that survivors of intentional injuries experience loss of social support following their injuries.ConclusionsEmotional responses can differ by intentionality of traumatic injury among urban Black men. Intentional injuries may be a marker for chronic exposure to violence and limited social support for recovery. Additional resources should be targeted to survivors of intentional injury who return to disadvantaged communities after medical treatment to decrease risk of re-traumatization and adverse emotional responses.     

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric firearm injuries in Colorado

BackgroundIn 2019 firearm injuries surpassed automobile-related injuries as the leading cause of pediatric death in Colorado. In the spring of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to community-level social, economic, and health impacts as well as changes to injury epidemiology. Thus, we sought to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric firearm injuries in Colorado.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of pediatric firearm injured patients (≤ 18-years-old) evaluated at three trauma centers in Colorado from 2018–2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the time of their firearm injury: pre- COVID injuries and post- COVID injuries. Group differences were examined using t-tests for continuous variables and Chi Squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.ResultsOverall, 343 firearm injuries occurred during the study period. There was a significant increase in firearm injuries as a proportion of overall pediatric ED trauma evaluations following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (pre COVID: 5.18/100 trauma evaluations; post COVID: 8.61/100 trauma evaluations, p<0.0001). Assaults were the most common injury intent seen both pre and post COVID (70.3% vs. 56.7%, respectively); however, unintentional injuries increased significantly from 10.3% to 22.5% (p = 0.004) following the onset of the pandemic. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 177% increase in unintentional injuries in adolescents.ConclusionPediatric firearm injuries, particularly unintentional injuries, increased significantly in Colorado following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantial increase in unintentional injuries among adolescents highlights the necessity of multi-disciplinary approaches to limit or regulate their access to firearms.Level of EvidenceLevel III.Study TypeRetrospective.     

Unintentional cutting or piercing injuries at home amongst young and middle-aged New Zealanders resulting in hospital admission: Context and characteristics

AimThis study investigated the characteristics and contexts of unintentional cutting or piercing injuries at home amongst young and middle-aged adults.MethodsWe conducted a population-based study of individuals aged 20–64 years who were admitted to hospital in the Auckland, Waikato and Otago regions of New Zealand following an unintentional cutting or piercing injury sustained at home. Participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire covering a range of factors including demographic information, circumstances of the injury, and personal factors such as medication, alcohol and recreational drug use.ResultsOf 340 eligible cases, 267(78.5%) were interviewed. The overall age-specific hospitalisation rate for cutting or piercing injuries was 30.7 per 100,000 (95% CI 27.4–33.9). The highest hospitalisation rates occurred amongst males aged 20–24 and 60–64 years. Common mechanisms of injury were: contact with sharp glass (30.0%), contact with a powered hand tool or household machinery (29.7%), contact with knife (10.8%), and contact with non-powered hand tool (10.8%). The mechanism of injury varied significantly by gender, age, and ethnicity.ConclusionPrevention strategies aimed at reducing the burden of cutting or piercing injuries occurring at home should focus on those most at risk including males aged 20–24 years, from injury by sharp glass, and those aged 40–64 years, from powered lawnmower, hand tool or household machinery-related injuries.     

Unintentional non-fatal home-related injuries in Central Anatolia, Turkey: frequencies, characteristics, and outcomes

Injuries constitute a major public health problem worldwide. Homes are an important setting for non-fatal unintentional injuries. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency, the characteristics, and the outcome of unintentional non-fatal injuries in the household, and to describe the related risk factors through a community-based survey.

The study was conducted using a household-based survey design. Eight hundred inhabitants were sampled from the entire population in the city centre by a stratified sampling method in 2004. All unintentional non-fatal home-related injuries occurring in the previous year were registered and examined, making special note of the mechanism of the injuries, the time and place of the incidents and their outcomes.

The frequency of unintentional non-fatal home-related injuries requiring some form of medical attention was established as 10.8%. Falls were the most common injuries among all the study groups. Injury rates were highest among the oldest (aged ≥65) and youngest (aged <15) age groups, females, adults having incomes under € 500, individuals living alone, or the unemployed. Contact with hot objects/substances or hot liquid/gas was the leading mechanism in children 4 years of age or younger, falls ranking second. Falls are a significant problem particularly among older adults.

Multiple analysis revealed that participants with low incomes, living alone and single or divorced had a high risk for injury at home. The findings related to disability highlighted a need to focus attention on the prevention of residential falls among the elderly, and the burns and falls among young children. Preventive measures should be prioritised to risk groups such as individuals with low incomes and those living alone.     

Injury among adolescents with intellectual disability: A prospective cohort study

IntroductionInjury is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in adolescents worldwide, and injury rates have been shown to be higher among youth with intellectual disability. Despite this, injury among adolescents with intellectual disability remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to identify characteristics associated with injury among adolescents with intellectual disability living in the community.MethodsA cohort of adolescents with intellectual disability living in southern Queensland, Australia was investigated prospectively between January 2006 and June 2010. Personal characteristics were collected via postal questionnaire. Injury information, including mechanism and location of injury, was extracted from general practitioner records. The association between demographic, social and clinical characteristics of participants and episodes of injury was investigated using negative binomial regression.ResultsA total of 289 injuries were recorded from 432 participants over 1627.3 years of study-time. The overall annual injury incidence was 17.5 (95%CI 14.7, 20.9) per 100 person years. Presence of ADHD and less severe disability was associated with increased risk of injury. Down syndrome and reduced verbal communication capacity were associated with decreased risk of injury. Falls accounted for the highest single mechanism of injury (19.0%) with the majority (73.2%) of injuries involving either upper or lower limbs.ConclusionsADHD is a co-morbidity that increases risk of injury among adolescents with intellectual disability. A critical component of injury prevention is avoidance of the great variety of environmental risk factors for injury relevant to this population.     

Gunshot injuries in Benghazi–Libya in 2011: The Libyan conflict and beyond

BackgroundSince independence, Libya has never experienced personal ownership of arms. That changed during the Libyan conflict where weapons became widespread in the society. As a result gunshot injuries became a concern for surgeons at our principal surgical hospital (Al-Jalaa). This study aims at analyzing the gunshot injuries that took place during 2011 and highlighting the peculiarities in the Libyan scenario.MethodsPatient records were obtained and gunshot injuries were analyzed for various parameters. Statistical analyses were made taking into consideration situations faced by neighbouring countries.ResultsIn 2011, 1761 patients were admitted with over 95% being male and over 97% were Libyan. The average age of a GSI patient was 28.32 ± 10.01 years. Patients aged 18–35 formed over 70% of the cases with half of all cases being treated by the orthopedics department. Sixty-eight percent of cases were injured in the extremities followed by chest (12.5%) and abdomen injuries (7.8%). The mortality rate for GSI's was found to be 5.6% overall with young age, site of injury (i.e. chest and head) and cause of injury (i.e. war or civilian fighting) being important risk factors.ConclusionsTaking into consideration the difficult operating conditions and limited resources, surgeons at our hospital were able to maintain a low mortality rate. Disarmament needs to begin as soon as possible because these injuries will continue to occur so long firearms are available in society.     

Frequency of fall-related injuries of female patients referred to the trauma center in the city of Kashan from years 2005 to 2008

Objective:Falls are one of the life events leading to injury and in serious cases cause high morbidity and mortality.This research was conducted to determine the fall incidence among female population ...     

Injury factors associated with discharge status from emergency room at two major trauma hospitals in The Gambia,Africa

IntroductionInjuries are the leading cause of disability across all ages and gender. In this study, we identified predictors of discharge status and disability at discharge among patients who seek emergency room treatment.Materials and methodsThe study was conducted in two major trauma hospitals in urban Gambia. 1905 patients participated in the study. 74.9% were males, and 25.1% were females. The study includes injured patients from all mechanisms. However, patients’ records without age, gender, injury mechanism, and deposition from the emergency room were considered incomplete and excluded. We examined distributions of injury by age, gender, mechanism, place of occurrence, intent, primary body part injured, and primary nature of injury. We identified demographic and injury characteristics associated with hospital admission (compared to emergency department discharge) and discharge disability (any level of disability compared with none).ResultsThe leading mechanisms of injury were road traffic (26.1%), struck by objects (22.1%), cut/pierce (19.2%), falls (19.2%), and burns (5.4%). Injuries most commonly occurred in the home (36.7%) and on the road (33.2%). For those aged 19–44, the proportion of injuries due to assault was higher for females (35.9%) than males (29.7%). Males had increased odds for admission (aOR = 1.48 95% CI = 1.15–1.91) and for disability (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.06–1.99). Increased odds for admission were found for brain injuries, fractures, large system injuries, and musculoskeletal injuries when compared with soft tissue injuries. The highest odds for any level of discharge disability were found for brain injuries, fractures, injuries from falls, burns, and road traffic.ConclusionsEpidemiology of injuries in The Gambia is similar to other low-income countries. However, the magnitude of cases and issues uncovered highlights the need for a formal registry.     

Are spine injuries sustained in battle truly different?

Background contextThe severity and prognosis of combat-related injuries to the spine and spine injuries sustained unrelated to direct combat have not been previously compared. Differences may have implications on tactics, treatment strategies, and directions for future research.PurposeCompare the severity and prognosis of battle and nonbattle injuries to the spine.Study designRetrospective study.Patient sampleAmerican military personnel who were injured in a combat zone and whose medical data were abstracted in the Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR).MethodsThe JTTR was queried using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to identify all individuals who sustained battle and nonbattle injuries to the neck, back, spinal column, or spinal cord in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom from October 2001 to December 2009. Medical records of all identified servicemembers were individually reviewed. Demographic information, including sex, age, military rank, date of injury, and final disposition, was obtained for all patients. Spinal injuries were categorized according to anatomic location, associated neurologic involvement, precipitating mechanism of injury (MOI), and concomitant wounds. These data points were compared for the groups battle spine injuries (BSIs) and nonbattle spine injuries (NBSIs).ResultsFive hundred two servicemembers sustained a total of 1,834 battle injuries to the spinal column, including 1,687 fractures (92%), compared with 92 servicemembers sustaining 267 nonbattle spinal column injuries, with 241 (90%) fractures. Ninety-one BSI servicemembers (18% of patients) sustained spinal cord injuries (SCIs) with 41 (45%) complete SCIs, compared with 13 (14% of patients) nonbattle SCIs with six (46.2%) complete injuries (p=.92). The reported MOI for 335 BSI servicemembers (66.7%) was an explosion compared with one NBSI explosive injury. Eighty-four patients (17%) sustained gunshot wounds (GSWs) in battle compared with five (5.2%) nonbattle GSWs. Fifteen patients (3.0%) sustained a battle-related fall compared with 29 (30%) nonbattle-related falls. Battle spine injury servicemembers underwent significantly higher rates of surgical interventions (p<.0001), were injured by high-energy injury mechanisms at a significantly greater rate (p<.0001), and demonstrated a trend toward lower neurologic recovery rates after SCI (p=.16).ConclusionsBattle spine injury and NBSI are separate entities that may ultimately have disparate long-term prognoses. Nonbattle spine injury patients, although having similar MOIs compared with civilian spinal trauma, maintain a different patient demographic. Further research must be directed at accurately quantifying the long-term disabilities of all spine injuries sustained in a combat theater, whether they are the result of battle or not.     

Comparison of childhood household injuries and risk factors between urban and rural communities in Ghana: A cluster-randomized,population-based,survey to inform injury prevention research and programming

BackgroundChildhood household injuries incur a major proportion of the global disease burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, household injury hazards are differentially distributed across developed environments. Therefore, we aimed to compare incidence of childhood household injuries and prevalence of risk factors between communities in urban and rural Ghana to inform prevention initiatives.MethodsData from urban and a rural cluster-randomized, population-based surveys of caregivers of children <5 years in Ghana were combined. In both studies, caregivers were interviewed about childhood injuries that occurred within the past 6 months and 200 meters of the home that resulted in missed school/work, hospitalization, and/or death. Sampling weights were applied, injuries and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were described, and multi-level regression was used to identify and compare risk factors.ResultsWe sampled 200 urban and 357 rural households that represented 20,575 children in Asawase and 14,032 children in Amakom, Ghana, respectively. There were 143 and 351 injuries in our urban and rural samples, which equated to 594 and 542 injuries per 1,000 child-years, respectively (IRR 1.09, 95%CI 1.05-1.14). Toddler-aged children had the highest odds of injury both urban and rural communities (OR 3.77 vs 3.17, 95%CI 1.34-10.55 vs 1.86-5.42 compared to infants, respectively). Urban children were more commonly injured by falling (IRR 1.50, 95%CI 1.41-1.60), but less commonly injured by flame/hot substances (IRR 0.51, 95%CI 0.44-0.59), violence (IRR 0.41, 95%CI 0.36-0.48), or motor vehicle (IRR 0.50, 95%CI 0.39-0.63). Rural households that cooked outside of the home (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.22-0.60) and that also supervised older children (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.17-0.62) had lower odds of childhood injuries than those that did not.ConclusionsChildhood injuries were similarly common in both urban and rural Ghana, but with different patterns of mechanisms and risk factors that must be taken into account when planning prevention strategies. However, the data suggest that several interventions could be effective, including: community-based, multi-strategy initiatives (e.g., home hazard reduction, provision of safety equipment, establishing community creches); traffic calming interventions in rural community clusters; and passive injury surveillance systems that collect data to inform violence and broader prevention strategies.     

Household economic impact of road traffic injury versus routine emergencies in a low-income country

IntroductionRoad traffic injuries (RTIs) are increasing and have disproportionate impact on residents of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where 90% of deaths occur. RTIs are a leading cause of death for those aged 15 – 29 years with costs estimated to be up to 3% of GDP. Despite this fact, little primary research has been done on the household economic impact of these events.MethodsFrom July to October 2016, 860 consecutive emergency department patients were enrolled and followed up at 6-8 weeks to assess the household financial impacts of these emergency presentations. At follow-up, patients were queried regarding health status, lost wages or schooling, household costs incurred due to their injury or illness, and assets sold.Results860 patients were enrolled and 675 patients (78%) completed follow-up surveys. Of those, 660 had a confirmed reason for visit - 303 (45%) road traffic injuries, 357 (53%) other emergency presentations (non-RTI) - encompassing medical presentations and other types of injury, and reason for visit was missing for 15 patients (2%). More than 90% of RTI patients were working or in school prior to their injury. In the economically productive ages (15-44 years) RTI predominated (70%) vs non-RTI (39%). RTI patients were more likely to report residual disability (78.2% RTI vs 68.1% non-RTI, p=0.004). All emergency patients reported difficulty paying for basic needs (food, housing and medical expenses). More than ⅓ of emergency patients reported having to sell assets in order to meet basic needs after their illness or injury. Despite similar hospital costs and fewer lost days of work for both patients and caregivers, the mean financial impact on households of RTI patients was 37% more than for non-RTI patients. These costs equalled between 6-16 weeks of income for patients based on their occupation type and median reported pre-hospitalization income.DiscussionUgandan emergency care patients suffered significant personal and household economic hardship. In addition to the need for policy and infrastructural changes to improve road safety, these findings highlight the need for basic emergency care systems to secure economic gains in vulnerable households and prevent medical impoverishment of marginal communities.     

Longer term health of young and middle-aged adults following unintentional falls at home resulting in hospitalisation

Unintentional falls at home are a common cause of admissions to hospital amongst young and middle-aged adults. This population-based study investigated the longer-term health, physical and psychological outcomes following such injuries, and the predictors of these sequelae.MethodIndividuals aged 25–60 years admitted to hospital in the Auckland region between July 2005 and June 2006 following an unintentional fall at home were interviewed soon after the injury (baseline) and 15-months following the injury. Information collected at baseline on pre-injury status was analysed in relation to changes in general health and functioning, psychological outcomes, and role limitations at follow-up.ResultsOf the 328 participants eligible for study, 251 (77%) completed the follow-up interview. Reductions in general health and overall functioning (compared with pre-injury status) were reported by 25% and 43% of participants, respectively. In multivariate analyses, predictors of specific adverse outcomes at follow-up included increasing age (reduction in functioning), lower limb injuries (reductions in general health and functioning); female gender (psychological sequelae); injury severity score ≥9 (anxiety and depression); and length of hospital stay (fear of falling and post-traumatic stress symptoms).ConclusionsThe significant longer-term reductions in health and levels of functioning reveal the importance of strengthening efforts to prevent falls amongst young and middle-aged adults, and identifying groups at increased risk of longer-term disability who could benefit from targeted interventions.     

Self harm is an independent predictor of mortality in trauma and burns patients admitted to ICU

BackgroundPatients with mental illness or depression may sustain self-inflicted injuries that require admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It is unknown whether the intent of injury leads to a greater likelihood of dying over and above the severity of the initial injury.Given the economic and societal burden of injury of self-harm, we designed this study to compare hospital outcomes of intentionally injured patients presenting to a tertiary ICU compared to unintentional injuries.MethodsThe regional trauma database was interrogated to produce two datasets that included all adult trauma patients admitted to the Alfred Intensive Care Unit between 01/07/2002 and 30/06/2007. The first included patients that sustained intentional injuries, the second comprised un-intentional injuries and acted as a control group. Logistic regression was used to model factors associated with mortality.ResultsIntentionally injured patients made up 4.17% of the total burns, blunt and penetrating trauma admissions to the Alfred ICU over the five-year study period. There was a trend towards higher mortality overall and in all subgroups of patients with intentional injuries when compared to those with un-intentional mechanisms of injury. After adjusting for injury severity and age, a mechanism of injury involving intentional injury was independently associated with a doubling of the odds of death.ConclusionsOur study is the first paper in the literature to describe an increased the risk of death within a group of patients admitted to a trauma and burns ICU following deliberate self-harm.     

Pediatric casualties in contemporary armed conflict: A systematic review to inform standardized reporting

BackgroundChildren represent a significant percentage of casualties in modern conflict. Yet, the epidemiology of conflict-related injury among children is poorly understood. A comprehensive analysis of injuries sustained by children in 21^st-century armed conflict is necessary to inform planning of local, military, and humanitarian health responses.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization Catalog, and Google Scholar to identify records that described conflict-related injuries sustained by children since 2001.ResultsThe search returned 5,264 records. 9 eligible reports without potentially duplicative data were included in analysis, representing 5,100 pediatric patients injured in 5 conflicts. Blast injury was the most frequent mechanism (57%), compared to 24.8% in adults. Mortality was only slightly higher among children (11.0% compared to 9.8% among adults; p <0.05). Non-uniform reporting prevented pooled analysis and limited the conclusions that could be drawn.ConclusionsChildren sustain a higher proportion of blast injury than adults in conflict. Existing data do support the conclusion that child casualties have higher mortality than adults overall; however, this difference is slighter than has been previously reported. Specific subpopulations of children appear to have worse outcomes. Overall, non-uniform reporting renders currently available data insufficient to understand the needs of children injured in modern conflict.     

A national analysis of pediatric falls from a building

IntroductionFalls remain the leading cause of unintentional pediatric trauma in the United States. Identifying risk factors for pediatric building falls would influence public health policy. We hypothesized that building falls disproportionately affect low income communities.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Kids’ Inpatient Database for years 2006, 2009, and 2012. We identified cases (age <12 years) of falls from a building using external cause of injury codes. Patient characteristics and injuries were analyzed using ICD-9 codes. National estimates were obtained using case weighting. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders.ResultsThere were 2,294 hospitalizations nationally for pediatric falls from a building. The victims were predominately male, in early childhood, non-Hispanic White, in the lowest income quartile, resided in urban settings, and occurred during summer. The mean age was 3.76 years. Logistic regression revealed males were 33% more likely than females, and as compared to non-Hispanic White youth, Black (33%) and Asian or Pacific Islanders (65%) were more likely to experience a fall from a building. Toddlers and those in early childhood were at significantly increased odds than those younger than one year old. Children in the highest income quartile were 29% more likely to experience a building fall.ConclusionsBuilding falls are a common cause of injury in the U.S. for children under 12 years old. Injury prevention strategies focused on the parents of children aged 1–5 years has the potential to make a significant public health impact.     

Incidence of childhood burn injuries and modifiable household risk factors in rural Ghana: A cluster-randomized,population-based,household survey

BackgroundWe aimed to determine the incidence of childhood burn injuries in rural Ghana and describe modifiable household risk factors to inform prevention initiatives.MethodsWe performed a cluster-randomized, population-based survey of caregivers of children in a rural district in Ghana, representing 2713 households and 14,032 children. Caregivers were interviewed regarding childhood burn injuries within the past 6 months and household risk factors.Results357 households were sampled. Most used an open fire with biomass fuel for cooking (85.8%). Households rarely cooked in a separate kitchen (10%). Stove height was commonly within reach of children under five years (<1 m; 96.0%). The weighted annualized incidence of CBI was 63 per 1000 child-years (6.4% of children per year); reported mean age was 4.4 years (SD 4.0). The most common etiology was flame burn. Older age (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.8–1.0) and households with an older sibling ≥12 years (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.3–1.3) seemed to be associated with lower odds of CBI.ConclusionsChildhood burn injury is common in rural Ghana. Opportunities exist to reduce the risk of childhood burn injury childhood burns in rural settings by supporting the transition to safer cooking arrangements, child barrier apparatuses in homes without older children, and/or development of formal childcare programs.