Diagnosis and treatment of 34 cases of blunt duodenal injuries

Objective： To summarize the experience on diagnosis and treatment of blunt duodenal injuries, and thus to improve the therapeutic skills. Methods ： Clinical data of 34 cases of blunt duodenal injuries admitted to our hospital from 1990 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Results ： Among them, 28 cases were cured, 20 cases presented with complications, and 6 cases died. The causes of death were： duodenal or pancreatic fistula in 2 cases, intra- and retroperitoneal infection complicating septicopyemia in 2, disseminated intravascular coagulation in 1 and multiple organ failure in 1. Conclusions： Misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis predispose to happen for blunt duodenal injuries. Early recognition and surgical intervention are critical to a successful rescue.     

The management of elderly blunt trauma victims in Scotland: evidence of ageism?

Health services are challenged with providing trauma care to an increasingly elderly population. The objectives of this study were to determine the in-hospital mortality for injured elderly patients, and by analysing key features of their management, to ascertain whether these trauma patients were managed less aggressively than their younger counterparts. Main outcome measures included; use of resuscitation room facilities, senior medical staff involvement, admission to intensive care units, transfers to regional neurosurgical centres and mortality. Three thousand seven hundred patients initially managed in a resuscitation room were significantly younger (mean age 43) than those not treated in this area (mean age 54, 95% CI 10.7-12.4). Considering seriously injured patients with a significant head injury (who did not present in coma) those transferred to neurosurgical care were younger (mean age 44) than patients who were not transferred (mean age 49, 95% CI 1. 6-8.6). Logistic regression analysis showed that age did not have a significant independent effect on the seniority of medical response from key specialties. For the severely injured, the odds of being admitted to an intensive care unit when aged 70 in comparison to age 30 were 0.7436 (95% CI 0.5787-0.9559). Overall in-hospital mortality of the 290 elderly patients who had sustained major trauma was 42.1%. Significantly more of the elderly died than would be predicted. Age appears to be an independent factor in the process of trauma care in Scottish hospitals. We consider that outcomes for the injured elderly could be improved by a more dynamic approach to their management.     

Are adrenal injuries predictive of adrenal insufficiency in patients sustaining blunt trauma?

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is an uncommon life-threatening development in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine if adrenal injury sustained during blunt trauma is associated with an increased risk of AI. A single-institution retrospective cohort review was performed over a 3-year period on all patients with blunt trauma requiring intensive care admission and mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours. Adrenal injuries were identified on admission CT scan. All patients with AI were identified as noted by practice management guidelines. Patients were stratified by Injury Severity Score (ISS) as less than 16, 16 to 25, and greater than 25 and relative risks were calculated. Multiple logistic regression was performed using age, race, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS, length of hospitalization, and adrenal injury as covariates with AI as the outcome of interest. A secondary analysis was then performed with adrenal injury classified as bilateral versus unilateral or no adrenal injury and relative risks were calculated for ISS strata. A total of 2072 patients were identified with 71 developing AI. Adrenal injuries were noted in 113 patients with eight subsequently developing AI. Multiple logistic regression model (P < 0.01) showed that age (P < 0.01) and increasing ISS (P = 0.02) were predictive of AI. Adrenal injury was not an independent predictor of AI (P = 0.12). After controlling for age and ISS, adrenal injury was not an independent predictor of the development of AI. Adrenal insufficiency should be considered with increasing injury severity and age in the intensive care setting after blunt trauma.     

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic trauma

Pdasenisvcterinereactt iiacvbe dt rsoaymumminpaatol mis isn a.ju Brryeult as tioitvm heealytsim caeo hmsig pwhlii ctihantoceuiddte aannncdeyof morbidity and complications.The mortality rate canbe as high as12%-20%.1Essential points inmanagement of pancrea…     

Nerve injuries of the upper extremity associated with vascular trauma—surgical treatment and outcome

Peripheral nerve injuries are often associated with injuries of adjacent tissue. As a result of anatomic proximity between nerves and vascular structures, there is a high chance of combined injuries of these structures (23 %). The aim of our study is to describe and analyze associated nerve and vascular injuries of the upper extremity in patients treated at the Clinic of Neurosurgery in Belgrade over a 10-year period. This study included 83 patients that received surgical treatment at the Clinic of Neurosurgery in Belgrade after having been diagnosed with upper extremity nerve injury. The study included all patients that satisfied these criteria over a period of 10 years. The patients with associated vascular injuries, 36 of them, were considered our study group, while 47 patients without associated vascular injuries were considered our control group. Finally, we compared treatment outcome between these groups. The final outcome evaluation was performed 2 years after surgical treatment. In our study group, 84.8 % surgical nerve repair was successful (fair, good, and excellent outcome), while in the control group (patients without vascular injury), surgical nerve repair was successful in 87.9 %. The overall satisfactory neurological outcome (M3–M5) was present in 86.6 % of nerve repairs. Our study shows that there is no significant difference between the treatment outcome in patients with associated nerve and vascular injuries and patients with isolated nerve injuries if they are diagnosed in time and treated appropriately. Successful treatment can only be accomplished through a multidisciplinary approach undertaken by a highly qualified medical team.     

Non-operative management of adult blunt splenic injuries

Objective:To investigate the indication of non-operative management of adult blunt splenic injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all adult patients ( age > 15 years) with blunt splenic injuries admitted to the department of vascular surgery of Pellegrin hospital in France from 1999 to 2003. We managed splenic injuries non-operatively in all appropriate patients without regard to age. Results: During the 4 years, 54 consecutive adult patients with blunt splenic injuries were treated in the hospital. A total of 27 patients with stable hemodynamic status were treated non-operatively at first, of which 2 patients were failed to non-operative treatment. The successful percentage of non-operative management was 92.6%. In the 54 patients, 7 of 8 patients older than 55 years were treated with non-operative management. Two cases developing postoperatively subphrenic infection were healed by proper treatment. In the series, there was no death. Conclusions: Non-operative management of low-grade splenic injuries can be accomplished with an acceptable low-failure rate. If the clinical and laboratory parameters difficult for surgeons to make decisions, they can depend on Resciniti' s CT ( computed tomography) scoring system to select a subset of adults with splenic trauma who are excellent candidates for a trial of nonoperative management. The patients older than 55 years are not absolutely inhibited to receive non-operative management.     

Detection of cervical spine injuries in alert, asymptomatic geriatric blunt trauma patients: who benefits from radiologic imaging?

There are differing recommendations in the literature regarding cervical spine imaging in alert, asymptomatic geriatric patients. Previous studies also have not used computed tomography routinely. Given that cervical radiographs may miss up to 60 per cent of fractures, the incidence of cervical spine injuries in this population and its implications for clinical management are unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of blunt trauma patients 65 years and older who were alert, asymptomatic, hemodynamically stable, and had normal neurologic examinations. For inclusion, patients were required to have undergone computed tomography and plain radiographs. The presence and anatomic location of potentially distracting injuries or pain were recorded. Two hundred seventy-four patients were included, with a mean age of 76 +/- 10 years. The main mechanisms of injury were falls (51%) and motor vehicle crashes (41%). Nine of 274 (3%) patients had cervical spine injuries. The presence of potentially distracting injuries above the clavicles was associated with cervical injury when compared with patients with distracting injuries in other anatomic locations or no distracting injuries (8/115 vs 1/159, P = 0.03). There was no association of cervical spine injury with age greater or less than 75 years or with mechanism of injury. The overall incidence of cervical spine injury in the alert, asymptomatic geriatric population is low. The risk is increased with a potentially distracting injury above the clavicles. Patients with distracting injuries in other anatomic locations or no distracting injuries may not need routine cervical imaging.     

Is delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma a valid quality improvement measure in the era of nonoperative management of abdominal injuries?

BACKGROUND: Review of hemodynamically stable patients who undergo laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission is an American College of Surgeons quality improvement filter. We reviewed our recent experience with patients who underwent laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission to evaluate the reasons for delay, and to determine whether they were because of failure of nonoperative management or other causes. METHODS: The registry at our Level I trauma center was searched from January 1998 through December 2000 for patients who required a laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission. Of 3,369 admitted blunt trauma patients, 90 (2.7%) underwent laparotomy for trauma, of which 26 (29%) were identified as delayed laparotomies greater than 4 hours after admission. RESULTS: The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash, the mean Injury Severity Score was 18, and 65% of the patients had significant distracting injuries. Five patients had laparotomy greater than 24 hours after admission. The average time to the operating room in the remaining patients was 8.6 hours. Clinical examination (61%) findings were the most common indication for operation. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract injury was the most common injury associated with delay in laparotomy (58%). CONCLUSION: GI tract injuries are the predominant injury leading to delayed laparotomy for blunt trauma (58%). Failed nonoperative management of solid organ injuries occurred less frequently (15%). Future efforts should concentrate on earlier identification of GI tract injury. Delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma is a valid quality improvement measure.     

Is anything new in adult blunt splenic trauma?

Several decades ago, a shift occurred in the management of adult splenic injuries. Influenced by the experience in pediatric trauma patients, adult trauma surgeons began turning from mandatory operative treatment of all splenic injuries toward nonoperative management. Nonoperative treatment is now the most common method of management for patients with splenic injuries and is the most common method of splenic salvage. However, controversy exists about how to appropriately select patients for nonoperative treatment since bleeding from splenic injuries can incur significant morbidity and mortality. Recent refinements in the management of adult blunt splenic injuries will be reviewed.     

The “Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm” avoids the underdiagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injuries

Objectives

Blunt cervical vascular injuries (BCVI) from alpine sports accidents bear an increased risk for being underdiagnosed during initial radiological evaluation. At our hospital, the “Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm”, which includes assessment of the neck as a computed tomography (CT) angiography during initial whole-body CT, has been introduced to avoid misdiagnoses and optimizes emergency radiology management.

Methods

Critically injured patients who were admitted for emergency CT after trauma from alpine skiing and mountain-biking accidents and who were reported with BCVI were included in this retrospective study.

Results

During 2003–2009, 36 victims were eligible for inclusion. They presented with a mean (SD) of 4.6 (2.1) diagnoses per patient, of which 3.5 (2.3) were perceptible on radiology examinations only. The “Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm” was performed in 15 individuals while 21 underwent another CT protocol including a native scan of the neck or during a parenchymatous contrast-medium phase only. In addition to BCVI, most patients (71%) were diagnosed with fractures followed by unspecific contusion/s (54%), head injuries (43%), and injuries of parenchymatous organs (19%). In five (14%), BCVI was underdiagnosed during the initial radiological examination. All of the latter had CT during a parenchymatous contrast-medium phase and not according to the “Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm”. Four of those patients died during their hospital stay. In 11, cerebral follow-up examinations showed cerebral pathologies considered as results from BCVI.

Conclusions

The “Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm” in patients with clinically unapparent BCVI after skiing and mountain-biking accidents avoided overlooking vascular injuries, which significantly improved their long-term outcome.     

Operative treatment of combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries in complex knee trauma: can the cruciate ligaments be preserved?

A retrospective study was performed focusing on operative treatment after combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. The operative treatment included the preservation of one or both cruciate ligaments. Twenty-eight patients, average age 30 years (range: 12-55 years), were evaluated 5.4 years (range: 1-14 years) postoperatively. Twenty-two operations were performed in patients with acute injuries (<30 days after trauma) and 6 operations in patients with chronic instabilities (>30 days after trauma). Both cruciate ligaments were preserved by suture or refixation in 16 patients. Suture of one and reconstruction of the other cruciate ligament with autologous tendon graft was performed in 12 cases. In addition, 61 procedures (meniscal suture/resection, medial/lateral reconstruction, tendon suture, and open reduction and internal fixation were performed. Postoperative treatment included continuous passive motion and protected weight bearing. Eleven (27% acute, 83% chronic) patients required revision (ACL/PCL reconstruction, osteotomy, and meniscal repair). At follow-up, 43% of the patients were very satisfied and 46% were satisfied. Seventy-one percent (89% preinjury) of the patients were able to maintain intensive and moderate International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity levels. The IKDC evaluation of the patients (acute %/chronic cases %) was graded for symptoms: A 39% (45/17), B 35% (27/67), C 15% (18/0), and D 11% (9/17); for range of motion: A 42% (36/67), B 42% (50/17), C 16% (14/17), and D 0%; and for ligaments: A 21% (18/17), B 33% (45/0), C 42% (32/83), and D 4% (5/0). Radiographic findings were A 18%, B 41%, and C 41%. Primary repair of acute injuries was superior to the delayed repair of chronic instabilities. Preservation of cruciate ligaments in acute combined ACL/PCL tears results in a satisfying knee function despite distinct residual ligament instability. Although suture of the cruciate ligaments in open technique is a therapeutic option in acute multiligamentous knee injuries, it is not recommended for the treatment of chronic instabilities.     

Orthopedic trauma of limbs associated with vascular injuries

Objective： To evaluate the treatment for patients with major vascular injuries associated with traumatic orthopedic injuries. Methods： A total of 196 patients, aged from 4-67 years with the mean age of 29.88 years, had major vascular injuries associated with traumatic orthopedic injuries and were treated in our hospital in a period of 44 years. The most common mechanism of trauma was blunt trauma （67.3 % ）, open injuries accounted for 32.4 % and 54.5 % of the injuries were located in the lower extremities. The vascular injury frequently happened in the femoral artery （26. 7 % ） and popliteal artery （ 20. 3 % ）. The treatment principle consisted of aggressive resuscitation, Doppler imaging and stable bone internal fixation with subsequent vascular repair and debridement. The vascular repair for injuries included end-to-end anastomosis （80 cases, 39.6 % ）, interpositional vein graft （94, 46.5 % ）, vascular decompression through fracture distraction （ 18, 8.9% ）,arterial ligation （6, 3.0% ）, vein patch （2, 1. 0%）, bypass graft （ 2, 1.0% ）, venous repair including autogenous vein graft （9, 24. 3%） and ligation （28, 75.7% ） and prophylactical fasciotomy （15. 7. 4%）. Postoperative amputation was performed in 16 cases （16.3%）. Results： No intraoperative death was observed and all fractures united within 6 months. Limbs were salvaged in 180 patients （91. 8% ）. Among these patients, early complications were found in 19 patients （9. 7 % ） and late complications were observed in 8 patients （4.1% ）. Conclusions： A well-organized approach, based on a specific treatment principle, not only improves clinical outcome but also does good to excellent functional recovery for patients with severe orthopedic injuries and concomitant vascular lesion.     

Clinical analysis of craniocerebral trauma complicated with thoracoabdominal injuries in 2165 cases

Ourhospitalhadadmittedandtreated2 16 5casesofcraniocerebraltraumacomplicatedwiththoraco abdomialinjuriesbetweenJuly 1993andJune 2 0 0 3.Aretrospectivestudywascarriedouttoexploretheoptimaltreatmentforcraniocerebraltraumacomplicatedwiththoraco abdominalinjuries.METHODSClinicaldataAtotalof 2 16 5cases (112 5malesand 10 4 0females)ofcraniocerebraltrauma (CCT)complicatedwiththoraco abdomialinjurieswereincludedinthestudy (averageage ,35 .5 years) .Causesofinjuriesweretrafficaccidentin 1384 (6 3…     

Clearing the cervical spine in victims of blunt assault to the head and neck: what is necessary?

A number of guidelines have been proposed to aid in determining the need for radiologic evaluation of the cervical spine (c-spine) in victims of blunt trauma. Mechanism of injury has not been shown to be an independent predictor of injury or the lack thereof. The current study was undertaken to determine the incidence of clinically relevant c-spine injuries in patients who sustained a blunt assault to the head and neck. The trauma registry of an urban Level 1 trauma center was used to identify patients who suffered a blunt assault to the head and neck and were admitted to the hospital over a 30-month period. One hundred two patients were identified. Only 8 patients met criteria for clinical clearance of the c-spine. Eighty patients were unable to be evaluated because of head injury or intoxicants; 14 patients had neck pain on initial examination. These 94 patients underwent plain film examination of their c-spine. Twelve required CT scanning to supplement visualization. The possibility of ligamentous injury was investigated by MRI or flexion/extension radiographs in 26 patients. No clinically significant c-spine injuries were identified. Although many victims of a blunt assault to the head and neck region may have a decreased LOC or neck pain, the likelihood of a ligamentous injury is so low that plain-film X-ray evaluation of the c-spine is all that is necessary to rule out injury in this patient population.