Targeting of mTORC2 prevents cell migration and promotes apoptosis in breast cancer

Most of breast cancers are resistant to mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) inhibitors rapamycin and rapalogs. Recent studies indicate mTORC2 is emerging as a promising cancer therapeutic target. In this study, we compared the inhibitory effects of targeting mTORC1 with mTORC2 on a variety of breast cancer cell lines and xenograft. We demonstrated that inhibition of mTORC1/2 by mTOR kinase inhibitors PP242 and OSI-027 effectively suppress phosphorylation of Akt (S473) and breast cancer cell proliferation. Targeting of mTORC2 either by kinase inhibitors or rictor knockdown, but not inhibition of mTORC1 either by rapamycin or raptor knockdown promotes serum starvation- or cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, targeting of mTORC2 but not mTORC1 efficiently prevent breast cancer cell migration. Most importantly, in vivo administration of PP242 but not rapamycin as single agent effectively prevents breast tumor growth and induces apoptosis in xenograft. Our data suggest that agents that inhibit mTORC2 may have advantages over selective mTORC1 inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancers. Given that mTOR kinase inhibitors are in clinical trials, this study provides a strong rationale for testing the use of mTOR kinase inhibitors or combination of mTOR kinase inhibitors and cisplatin in the clinic.     

Selective Chk1 inhibitors differentially sensitize p53-deficient cancer cells to cancer therapeutics

The majority of cancer therapeutics induces DNA damage to kill cells. Normal proliferating cells undergo cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage, thus allowing DNA repair to protect the genome. DNA damage induced cell cycle arrest depends on an evolutionarily conserved signal transduction network in which the Chk1 kinase plays a critical role. In mammalian cells, the p53 and RB pathways further augment the cell cycle arrest response to prevent catastrophic cell death. Given the fact that most tumor cells suffer defects in the p53 and RB pathways, it is likely that tumor cells would depend more on the Chk1 kinase to maintain cell cycle arrest than would normal cells. Therefore Chk1 inhibition could be used to specifically sensitize tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. We have previously shown that siRNA-mediated Chk1 knockdown abrogates DNA damage-induced checkpoints and potentiates the cytotoxicity of several DNA-damaging agents in p53-deficient cell lines. In this study, we have developed 2 potent and selective Chk1 inhibitors, A-690002 and A-641397, and shown that these compounds abrogate cell cycle checkpoints and potentiate the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase inhibitors and gamma-radiation in p53-deficient but not in p53-proficient cells of different tissue origins. These results indicate that it is feasible to achieve a therapeutic window with 1 or more Chk1 inhibitors in potentiation of cancer therapy based on the status of the p53 pathway in a wide spectrum of tumor types.     

Selective concomitant inhibition of mTORC1 and mTORC2 activity in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer cells by BN107 and oleanolic acid

Hormonal, targeted and chemotherapeutic strategies largely depend on the expression of their cognate receptors and are often accompanied by intolerable toxicities. Effective and less toxic therapies for estrogen receptor negative (ER−) breast cancers are urgently needed. Here, we present the potential molecular mechanisms mediating the selective pro‐apoptotic effect induced by BN107 and its principle terpene, oleanolic acid (OA), on ER− breast cancer cells. A panel of breast cancer cell lines was examined and the most significant cytotoxic effect was observed in ER− breast lines. Apoptosis was the major cellular pathway mediating the cytotoxicity of BN107. We demonstrated that sensitivity to BN107 was correlated to the status of ERα. Specifically, the presence of functional ERα protected cells from BN107‐induced apoptosis and absence of ERα increased the sensitivity. BN107, an extract rich in OA derivatives, caused rapid alterations in cholesterol homeostasis, presumably by depleting cholesterol in lipid rafts (LRs), which subsequently interfered with signaling mediated by LRs. We showed that BN107 or OA treatment in ER− breast cancer cells resulted in rapid and specific inhibition of LR‐mediated survival signaling, namely mTORC1 and mTORC2 activities, by decreasing the levels of the mTOR/FRAP1, RAPTOR and RICTOR. Cotreatment with cholesterol abolished the proapoptotic effect and restored the disrupted mTOR activities. This is the first report demonstrating possible concomitant inhibition of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 activities by modulating the levels of protein constituents present in these signaling complexes, and thus provides a basis for future development of OA‐based mTOR inhibitors.     

An indolocarbazole inhibitor of human checkpoint kinase (Chk1) abrogates cell cycle arrest caused by DNA damage

Many cancer therapies cause DNA damage to effectively kill proliferating tumor cells; however, a major limitation of current therapies is the emergence of resistant tumors following initial treatment. Cell cycle checkpoints are involved in the response to DNA damage and specifically prevent cell cycle progression to allow DNA repair. Tumor cells can take advantage of the G2 checkpoint to arrest following DNA damage and avoid immediate cell death. This can contribute to acquisition of drug resistance. By abrogating the G2 checkpoint arrest, it may be possible to synergistically augment tumor cell death induced by DNA damage and circumvent resistance. This requires an understanding of the molecules involved in regulating the checkpoints. Human Chk1 is a recently identified homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe checkpoint kinase gene, which is required for G2 arrest in response to DNA damage. Chk1 phosphorylates the dual specificity phosphatase cdc25C on Ser-216, and this may be involved in preventing cdc25 from activating cdc2/cyclinB and initiating mitosis. To further study the role of Chk1 in G2 checkpoint control, we identified a potent and selective indolocarbazole inhibitor (SB-218078) of Chk1 kinase activity and used this compound to assess cell cycle checkpoint responses. Limited DNA damage induced by gamma-irradiation or the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan was used to induce G2 arrest in HeLa cells. In the presence of the Chk1 inhibitor, the cells did not arrest following gamma-irradiation or treatment with topotecan, but continued into mitosis. Abrogation of the damage-arrest checkpoint also enhanced the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I inhibitors. These studies suggest that Chk1 activity is required for G2 arrest following DNA damage.     

Rapamycin regulates Akt and ERK phosphorylation through mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling pathways

Numerous studies have shown that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor activates Akt signaling pathway via a negative feedback loop while inhibiting mTORC1 signaling. In this report, we focused on studying the role of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in rapamycin‐mediated Akt and ERK phosphorylation, and the antitumor effect of rapamycin in cancer cells in combination with Akt and ERK inhibitors. Moreover, we analyzed the effect of mTORC1 and mTORC2 on regulating cell cycle progression. We found that low concentrations rapamycin increased Akt and ERK phosphorylation through a mTORC1‐dependent mechanism because knockdowned raptor induced the activation of Akt and ERK, but higher doses of rapamycin inhibited Akt and ERK phosphorylation mainly via the mTORC2 signaling pathway because that the silencing of rictor led to the inhibition of Akt and ERK phosphorylation. We further showed that mTORC2 was tightly associated with the development of cell cycle through an Akt‐dependent mechanism. Therefore, we combined PI3K and ERK inhibitors prevent rapamycin‐induced Akt activation and enhanced antitumor effects of rapamycin. Collectively, we conclude that mTORC2 plays a much more important role than mTORC1 in rapamycin‐mediated phosphorylation of Akt and ERK, and cotargeting AKT and ERK signaling may be a new strategy for enhancing the efficacy of rapamycin‐based therapeutic approaches in cancer cells. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Selective targeting of the mTORC1/2 protein kinase complexes leads to antileukemic effects in vitro and in vivo

The BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase promotes leukemogenesis through activation of several targets that include the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target BCR/ABL, induce striking clinical responses. However, therapy with TKIs is associated with limitations such as drug intolerance, inability to universally eradicate the disease and emergence of BCR/ABL drug-resistant mutants. To overcome these limitations, we tested whether inhibition of the PI3K/target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway has antileukemic effect in primary hematopoietic stem cells and BA/F3 cells expressing the BCR/ABL oncoprotein. We determined that dual inhibition of PI3K/mTOR causes growth arrest and apoptosis leading to profound antileukemic effects both in vitro and in vivo. We also established that pharmacologic inhibition of the mTORC1/mTORC2 complexes is sufficient to cause these antileukemic effects. Our results support the development of inhibitors of the mTORC1/2 complexes for the therapy of leukemias that either express BCR/ABL or display deregulation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway.     

Dual induction of apoptosis and senescence in cancer cells by Chk2 activation: checkpoint activation as a strategy against cancer

The human checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) plays a central role in regulation of the cellular response to DNA damage, resulting in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis depending on severity of DNA damage and the cellular context. Chk2 inhibitors are being developed as sensitizers for chemotherapeutic agents. In contrast, here we report that direct activation of Chk2 alone (without chemotherapeutic agents) led to potent inhibition of cancer cell proliferation. In the absence of de novo DNA damage, checkpoint activation was achieved by increased Chk2 expression, as evidenced by its phosphorylation at Thr68, resulting in senescence and apoptosis of cancer cells (DLD1 and HeLa). The Chk2-induced apoptosis was p53 independent and was mediated by caspase activation triggered by loss of mitochondrial potential. The Chk2-induced senescence was also p53 independent and was associated with induction of p21. These results suggest that direct activation of checkpoint kinases may be a novel approach for cancer therapy.     

Dual inhibition of the mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling pathways is a promising therapeutic target for adult T‐cell leukemia

Adult T‐cell leukemia (ATL) has a poor prognosis as a result of severe immunosuppression and rapid tumor progression with resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Recent integrated‐genome analysis has revealed mutations in many genes involved in the T‐cell signaling pathway, suggesting that the aberration of this pathway is an important factor in ATL pathogenesis and ATL‐cell proliferation. We screened a siRNA library to examine signaling‐pathway functionality and found that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is critical to ATL‐cell proliferation. We therefore investigated the effect of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, including the dual inhibitors PP242 and AZD8055 and the mTORC1 inhibitors rapamycin and everolimus, on human T‐cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV‐1)‐infected‐cell and ATL‐cell lines. Both dual inhibitors inhibited the proliferation of all tested cell lines by inducing G1‐phase cell‐cycle arrest and subsequent cell apoptosis, whereas the effects of the 2 mTORC1 inhibitors were limited, as they did not induce cell apoptosis. In the ATL‐cell lines and in the primary ATL samples, both dual inhibitors inhibited phosphorylation of AKT at serine‐473, a target of mTORC2, as well as that of S6K, whereas the mTORC1 inhibitors only inhibited mTORC1. Furthermore, AZD8055 more significantly inhibited the in vivo growth of the ATL‐cell xenografts than did everolimus. These results indicate that the PI3K/mTOR pathway is critical to ATL‐cell proliferation and might thus be a new therapeutic target in ATL.     

BRCA1-mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest requires ERK1/2 kinase activation

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene are associated with an increased susceptibility to the development of breast and ovarian cancers. Evidence suggests that BRCA1 protein plays a key role in mediating DNA damage-induced checkpoint responses. Several studies have shown that ectopic expression of BRCA1 in human cells can trigger cellular responses similar to those induced by DNA damage, including G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. While the effects of ectopic BRCA1 expression on the G2/M transition and apoptosis have been extensively studied, the factors that dictate the balance between these two responses remain poorly understood. We have recently shown that ectopic expression of BRCA1 in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells resulted in activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and G2/M cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, inhibition of BRCA1-induced ERK1/2 activation using mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2)-specific inhibitors resulted in increased apoptosis, suggesting a potential role of ERK1/2 kinases in BRCA1-mediated G2/M checkpoint response. In this study, we assessed the role of ERK1/2 kinases in the regulation of BRCA1-mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest. Results indicate that BRCA1-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and ERK1/2 activation correlate with changes in the level and/or activity of several key regulators of the G2/M checkpoint, including activation of Chk1 and Wee1 kinases, induction of 14-3-3, and down-regulation of Cdc25C. Furthermore, inhibition of ERK1/2 kinases using MEK1/2-specific inhibitors results in a marked attenuation of the BRCA1-induced G2/M arrest. Biochemical studies established that ERK1/2 inhibition abolished the effects of BRCA1 on components of the G2/M checkpoint, including regulation of Cdc25C expression and activation of Wee1 and Chk1 kinases. These results implicate a critical role of ERK1/2 signaling in the regulation of BRCA1 function on controlling the G2/M checkpoint responses.     

Combined Src and ER blockade impairs human breast cancer proliferation in vitro and in vivo

Antiestrogen therapies arrest susceptible estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers by increasing p27. Since Src phosphorylates p27 to promote p27 proteolysis, Src activation observed in up to 40% of ER-positive cancers may contribute to antiestrogen resistance. In this article, we show that treatment with the Src-inhibitor saracatinib (AZD0530) together with ER-blocking drugs increased breast cancer cell cycle arrest via p27. Saracatinib and fulvestrant together more effectively increased p27, reduced Ki67, and impaired MDA-MB-361 xenograft tumor growth in vivo than either of the drugs alone. In contrast, saracatinib monotherapy rapidly gave rise to drug resistance. Since combined ER and Src inhibition delays development of resistance in vivo, these data support further clinical investigation of saracatinib in combination with fulvestrant for women with ER-positive breast cancer. Proteomic analysis revealed striking bypass activation of the mTOR pathway in saracatinib-resistant tumors. mTORC1 activation also arose following long-term culture of ER-positive breast cancer lines in the presence of saracatinib. These data indicate the utility of proteomic analysis of drug-resistant tumors to identify potential means of drug resistance. The use of mTOR kinase inhibitors with saracatinib may subvert drug resistance and prove to be more effective than saracatinib alone.     

Knockdown of Chk1, Wee1 and Myt1 by RNA interference abrogates G2 checkpoint and induces apoptosis

Mammalian cells undergo cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage due to the existence of multiple checkpoint response mechanisms. One such checkpoint pathway operating at the G(1) phase is frequently lost in cancer cells due to mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. However, cancer cells often arrest at the G(2) phase upon DNA damage, due to activation of another checkpoint pathway that prevents the activation Cdc2 kinase. The kinases, Chk1, Wee1, and Myt1 are key regulators of this G(2) checkpoint, which act directly or indirectly to inhibit Cdc2 activity. Here we show that RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated downregulation of Wee1 kinase abrogated an Adriamycin trade mark -induced G(2) checkpoint in human cervical carcinoma Hela cells that are defective in G(1) checkpoint response. Wee1 downregulation sensitized HeLa cells to Adriamycin trade mark -induced apoptosis. Downregulation of Chk1 kinase in Hela cells also caused a significant amount of cell death in dependent of DNA damage. In contrast, Myt1 downregulation also abrogated Adriamycin trade mark -induced G(2) arrest but did not cause substantial apoptosis. Reduction in Wee1, Chk1, or Myt1 levels did not sensitize normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) cells to Adriamycin trade mark -induced apoptosis unlike the situation in Hela cells. Our study reveals distinct roles for Chk1, Wee1, and Myt1 in G(2) checkpoint regulation. The data reported here support the attractiveness of Wee1 and Chk1 is as molecular targets for abrogating the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint arrest, a situation that may selectively sensitize p53-deficient tumor cells to radiation or chemotherapy treatment.     

Novel regulation of checkpoint kinase 1: Is checkpoint kinase 1 a good candidate for anti‐cancer therapy?

DNA‐damaging strategies, such as radiotherapy and the majority of chemotherapeutic therapies, are the most frequently used non‐surgical anti‐cancer therapies for human cancers. These therapies activate DNA damage/replication checkpoints, which induce cell‐cycle arrest to provide the time needed to repair DNA damage. Due to genetic defect(s) in the ATM (ataxia‐telangiectasia mutated)‐Chk2‐p53 pathway, an ATR (ATM‐ and Rad3‐related)‐Chk1‐Cdc25 route is the sole checkpoint pathway in a majority of cancer cells. Chk1 inhibitors are expected to selectively induce the mitotic cell death (mitotic catastrophe) of cancer cells. However, recent new findings have pointed out that Chk1 is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity even during unperturbed cell‐cycle progression, which is controlled by a variety of protein kinases. These observations have raised concerns about a possible risk of Chk1 inhibitors on the clinics. In this review, we summarize recent advances in Chk1 regulation by phosphorylation, and discuss Chk1 as a molecular target for cancer therapeutics. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 1195–1200)     

Rheb signaling and tumorigenesis: mTORC1 and new horizons

Rheb is a conserved small GTPase that belongs to the Ras superfamily, and is mainly involved in activation of cell growth through stimulation of mTORC1 activity. Because deregulation of the Rheb/mTORC1 signaling is associated with proliferative disorders and cancer, inhibition of mTORC1 has been therapeutically approached. Although this therapy has proven antitumor activity, its efficacy is not as expected. Here, we will review the main work on the identification of the role of Rheb in cell growth, and on the relevance of Rheb in proliferative disorders, including cancer. We will also review the Rheb functions that could explain tumor resistance to therapies with mTORC1 inhibitors, and will mainly focus our discussion on mTORC1‐independent Rheb functions that could also be implicated in cancer cell survival and tumorigenesis. The current progress on the understanding of the noncanonical Rheb functions prompts future studies to establish their relevance in cancer and in the context of current cancer therapies.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 functions in normal DNA repair and is a therapeutic target in BRCA1-deficient cancers

Abnormal regulation of progression from G(1) to S phase of the cell cycle by altered activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) is a hallmark of cancer. However, inhibition of CDKs, particularly CDK2, has not shown selective activity against most cancer cells because the kinase seems to be redundant in control of cell cycle progression. Here, we show a novel role in the DNA damage response and application of CDK inhibitors in checkpoint-deficient cells. CDK2(-/-) mouse fibroblasts and small interfering RNA--mediated or small-molecule--mediated CDK2 inhibition in MCF7 or U2OS cells lead to delayed damage signaling through Chk1, p53, and Rad51. This coincided with reduced DNA repair using the single-cell comet assay and defects observed in both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining in cell-based assays. Furthermore, tumor cells lacking cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 or ATM are 2- to 4-fold more sensitive to CDK inhibitors. These data suggest that inhibitors of CDK2 can be applied to selectively enhance responses of cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Moreover, inhibitors of CDKs may be useful therapeutics in cancers with defects in DNA repair, such as mutations in the familial breast cancer gene BRCA1.     

PIK3CA mutation, but not PTEN loss of function, determines the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to mTOR inhibitory drugs

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is commonly activated in breast cancers due to frequent mutations in PIK3CA, loss of expression of PTEN or over-expression of receptor tyrosine kinases. PI3K pathway activation leads to stimulation of the key growth and proliferation regulatory kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which can be inhibited by rapamycin analogues and by kinase inhibitors; the effectiveness of these drugs in breast cancer treatment is currently being tested in clinical trials. To identify the molecular determinants of response to inhibitors that target mTOR via different mechanisms in breast cancer cells, we investigated the effects of pharmacological inhibition of mTOR using the allosteric mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus and the active-site mTORC1/mTORC2 kinase inhibitor PP242 on a panel of 31 breast cancer cell lines. We demonstrate here that breast cancer cells harbouring PIK3CA mutations are selectively sensitive to mTOR allosteric and kinase inhibitors. However, cells with PTEN loss of function are not sensitive to these drugs, suggesting that the functional consequences of these two mechanisms of activation of the mTOR pathway are quite distinct. In addition, a subset of HER2-amplified cell lines showed increased sensitivity to PP242, but not to everolimus, irrespective of the PIK3CA/PTEN status. These selective sensitivities were confirmed in more physiologically relevant three-dimensional cell culture models. Our findings provide a rationale to guide selection of breast cancer patients who may benefit from mTOR inhibitor therapy and highlight the importance of accurately assessing the expression of PTEN protein and not just its mutational status.     

Dramatic antitumor effects of the dual mTORC1 and mTORC2 inhibitor AZD2014 in hepatocellular carcinoma

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has emerged as a critical effector in cell growth, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, and autophagy through direct interaction with mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1) and mTORC2 (mTOR complex 2). The mTOR axis is aberrantly activated in about 50% of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases and thus has become an attractive target for drug development in this disease. Allosteric inhibitors of mTORC1, rapamycin and its derivatives have been used to study in patients with HCC but have not shown significant clinical utility, likely because of the lack of inhibition of mTORC2. In the present study, we describe that AZD2014, a small molecular ATP-competitive inhibitor of mTOR, was a highly potent inhibitor of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in human HCC cells, which led to a more thorough inhibition of mTORC1 than rapamycin, and the inhibition of mTORC2 prevented the feedback activation of AKT signaling. Compared with rapamycin, AZD2014 resulted in more profound proliferation suppression, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and autophagy in HCC cells. Notably, we found blockage of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 by AZD2014 to be more efficacious than blockage of mTORC1 alone by rapamycin in inhibiting the migration, invasion and EMT progression of HCC cells. In conclusion, our current results highlight mechanistic differentiation between rapamycin and AZD2014 in targeting cancer cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy, migration, invasion and EMT progression, and provide support for further investigation of AZD2014 as an antitumor agent for the treatment of HCC in clinic.     

mTORC2 regulates ribonucleotide reductase to promote DNA replication and gemcitabine resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is the key enzyme that catalyzes the production of deoxyribonucleotides (dNTPs) for DNA replication and it is also essential for cancer cell proliferation. As the RNR inhibitor, Gemcitabine is widely used in cancer therapies, however, resistance limits its therapeutic efficacy and curative potential. Here, we identified that mTORC2 is a main driver of gemcitabine resistance in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of mTORC2 greatly enhanced gemcitabine induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage. Mechanistically, mTORC2 directly interacted and phosphorylated RNR large subunit RRM1 at Ser 631. Ser631 phosphorylation of RRM1 enhanced its interaction with small subunit RRM2 to maintain sufficient RNR enzymatic activity for efficient DNA replication. Targeting mTORC2 retarded DNA replication fork progression and improved therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine in NSCLC xenograft model in vivo. Thus, these results identified a mechanism through mTORC2 regulating RNR activity and DNA replication, conferring gemcitabine resistance to cancer cells.     

Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy

The evolutionally conserved DNA damage response (DDR) and cell cycle checkpoints preserve genome integrity. Central to these genome surveillance pathways is a protein kinase, Chk1. DNA damage induces activation of Chk1, which then transduces the checkpoint signal and facilitates cell cycle arrest and DNA damage repair. Significant progress has been made recently toward our understanding of Chk1 regulation and its implications in cancer etiology and therapy. Specifically, a model that involves both spatiotemporal and conformational changes of proteins has been proposed for Chk1 activation. Further, emerging evidence suggests that Chk1 does not appear to be a tumor suppressor; instead, it promotes tumor growth and may contribute to anticancer therapy resistance. Recent data from our laboratory suggest that activating, but not inhibiting, Chk1 in the absence of chemotherapy might represent an innovative approach to suppress tumor growth. These findings suggest unique regulation of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer etiology, pointing to novel strategies for targeting Chk1 in cancer therapy.     

Single-agent inhibition of Chk1 is antiproliferative in human cancer cell lines in vitro and inhibits tumor xenograft growth in vivo

Chk1 is a serine/threonine kinase that plays several important roles in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. Since many current standard-of-care therapies for human cancer directly damage DNA or inhibit DNA synthesis, there is interest in using small molecule inhibitors of Chk1 to potentiate their clinical activity. Additionally, Chk1 is known to be critically involved in cell cycle progression of unperturbed cells. Therefore, it is plausible that treatment with a Chkl inhibitor alone could also be an efficacious cancer therapy. Here we report that Chk1-A, a potent and highly selective small molecule inhibitor of Chk1, is antiproliferative as a single agent in a variety of human cancer cell lines in vitro. The inhibition of proliferation is associated with collapse of DNA replication and apoptosis. Rapid decreases in inhibitory phosphorylation of CDKs and a concomitant increase in CDK kinase activity and chromatin loading of Cdc45 suggest that the antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of Chk1-A is at least in part due to deregulation of DNA synthesis. We extend these in vitro studies by demonstrating that Chk1-A inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts in vivo in a treatment regimen that is well tolerated. Together, these results suggest that single-agent inhibition of Chk1 may be an effective treatment strategy for selected human malignancies.     

New opportunities in chemosensitization and radiosensitization: modulating the DNA-damage response

Many current cancer treatments, including certain classes of chemotherapeutics and radiation, induce cytotoxicity by damaging DNA. However, many cancers are resistant to these therapies, which represents a significant challenge in the clinic. Thus, modulating DNA-damage responses to selectively enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to these therapies is highly desirable. When DNA damage is detected, DNA checkpoint mechanisms are activated to halt cells at various phases of the cell cycle. Simultaneously, DNA-damage sensors transduce signals to activate DNA-repair mechanisms via de novo expression or post-translational modification of enzymes required for DNA repair. p53 is the major player in a checkpoint that arrests cells at the G1/S boundary, while checkpoint kinase (Chk)1 is critical for the G2/M checkpoint and also the S checkpoint that prevents cell cycle progression after replication defects (intra-S-phase checkpoint) or S/M uncoupling (S/M checkpoint). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is involved in sensing DNA single-strand breaks and inducing DNA repair via poly(ADP-ribosyl)ating various DNA-binding and DNA-repair proteins. In this review, strategies for implementing small-molecule inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and Chk1, which are emerging as potential adjuncts to current therapies, are discussed.