Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to study the incidence and outcome of flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients. METHODS: A survey of flexor tendon repair in children less than 16 years of age was performed in the City of Helsinki during 2000-2005. A retrospective clinical outcome study of all consecutive 28 patients with 45 involved fingers treated in Children's Hospital was also performed at a mean 38 months (range 12-53 months) after surgery. Active motion program after multistrand tendon repair was used in 33 fingers, cast immobilization in 11 fingers, and elastic bands in 1 finger. Functional and cosmetic subjective result was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100). Range of motion (ROM) of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints were measured. Grip strength was recorded. Functional outcome methods of Buck-Gramcko, ASSH, Strickland, and distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) ROM methods were applied. RESULTS: The calculated annual incidence of finger flexor injury per child in Helsinki was 0.036 per 1000. There were no ruptures of the multistrand repairs with active motion program, but three 2-strand core sutures failed within 1 month of the repair. Mean functional and cosmetic VAS scores (all 28 patients) were 87 and 84. Mean ROM ratio of the DIP joint in zone 1 and 2 injuries was 60%, compared to 98% in zone 3 and 5 injuries. Ranges of motion of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and MCP joints were practically normal in all patients. There was a discrepancy among the functional outcome scores, with good and excellent results in all 45 fingers (Buck-Gramcko), in 39 fingers (ASSH), in 36 fingers (original Strickland), and in 32 fingers (DIP ROM). CONCLUSIONS: Flexor tendon injuries in children are rare. Both subjective and objective outcomes are generally good. Active motion program is an effective technique after multistrand flexor tendon repair at all levels in children. Range of motion of the DIP joint may be a more effective means of evaluating outcome in pediatric flexor tendon injuries. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.     

Long-term results after primary repairs of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations in children younger than age 6 years

In young children, methods of primary flexor tendon repair in the digital canal are controversial. The authors reviewed 12 children younger than age 6 years with zone 2 flexor tendon repairs. The mean follow-up period was 8 years. In all cases, the flexor digitorum profundus tendons were repaired according to the Kessler modified technique and the hands were immobilized by an above-elbow cast. As for postoperative complications, there were no fingers with tendon rupture and two fingers with tendon adhesion. One finger needed tenolysis. The total active motion (TAM) in the interphalangeal joints evaluated with the Strickland formula averaged 155 degrees, and the TAM percentage averaged 89% (range 74%-100%). Eleven patients had an excellent result and one had a good result. The percentage phalangeal length averaged 99% (range 96%-100%). Functional motion and nearly normal growth of the finger can be expected after primary zone 2 flexor tendon repairs in children younger than age 6 years.     

Flexor tendon repair in zone II with 6-strand techniques and early active mobilization

PURPOSE: There are many biomechanic studies of 6-strand suture techniques for active mobilization, but few reports have described the clinical outcome in zone II flexor tendon lacerations. We discuss the clinical results of zone II flexor tendon repair using 2 of these techniques followed by controlled early active mobilization. METHODS: Six-strand sutures using the number 1 technique by Yoshizu or a triple-looped suture technique were used to repair flexor tendons in 27 fingers from 21 consecutive patients. Fingers were mobilized by combining active extension and passive or active flexion in a protective splint for the first 3 weeks after surgery. The follow-up period averaged 13 months. RESULTS: Based on the original Strickland criteria, the results were excellent in 17 fingers, good in 9, and fair in 1. The average flexion was 62 degrees for distal interphalangeal joints and 91 degrees for proximal interphalangeal joints. None of the repaired tendons ruptured. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-strand flexor tendon suture technique followed by controlled active mobilization protected with a dorsal splint is safe, produces no ruptures, and achieves very good results in zone II flexor tendon laceration repair. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level II.     

Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion

PURPOSE: Independent FDS action has been cited to be problematic with repair of multiple tendons in zone V owing to adhesion formation between the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons. Of the several described flexor repair techniques the ideal tendon repair should be strong enough to allow for early active motion to minimize adhesion formation and maximize tendon healing. Biomechanical studies have proven the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) repair to be strong enough to allow for early active motion. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of the MGH technique for zone V flexor tendon injuries to allow for early protected active motion to achieve independent finger flexion through better differential gliding of the tendons. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review 168 zone V finger flexor tendon repairs for 29 patients performed consecutively over 4 years when early active motion was not contraindicated. The same early protected active motion protocol was used for all of these patients. We reviewed total active motion, independent flexion, rupture, and need for tenolysis. These injuries involved 103 FDS and 65 FDP tendons to 103 fingers. The median follow-up period was 24 weeks. Of these 29 patients 19 were men and 10 were women. The average patient age was 28 years. RESULTS: The total active motion for these zone V repairs was 236 degrees +/- 5 degrees Overall 97 of 103 digits attained good to excellent function and 88 of 103 developed some differential glide. One of these patients required a tenolysis. Three repairs ruptured in 1 patient owing to suture breakage that was associated with noncompliance with the dorsal extension block splint. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective review of 168 consecutive flexor tendon repairs showed that the MGH technique allowed for early protected active motion, which provided good to excellent functional outcomes with 88 of 103 developing independent finger flexion at an acceptably low complication risk.     

Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.     

Two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction in zone II using Hunter's technique

Tendon injuries in the digital flexor sheath area (zone II) are the most difficult to treat and remain a focus of both clinical attention and basic investigations. Although some new techniques have been developed, the clinical results are still not satisfying, especially in old injuries. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the results of delayed zone II flexor tendon repair using Hunter rods. Between July 1974 and June 1998, 81 patients at our institution underwent 2-stage reconstruction using Hunter's technique. Sixty-one patients with 106 fingers were included in this study. Digital flexor tendon resection and Hunter rod implantation were performed in the first-stage operation. Combined digital nerve injuries and damaged pulleys were repaired or reconstructed at the same time. Plaster was used to immobilize the hand for 3 weeks. During the second-stage operation, performed 2 to 6 months later, palmaris longus or plantaris were grafted into the pseudosheath formed surrounding the Hunter rods. The proximal end of the transplanted tendon was fixated with flexor digitorum profundus tendon using the Pulvertaft method, and the distal end was fixated to the distal phalanx using Bunnell's pullout wire method. Early controlled motion was performed in all cases. Evaluation based on total active motion was good to excellent in 84%, fair in 12%, and poor in 4% of patients. Flexor tendon reconstruction using Hunter technique is an effective way to restore digital function in delayed zone II flexor tendon injuries.     

Extensor tendon injuries in children

INTRODUCTION: This study retrospectively analyzes primary extensor tendon repairs in children younger than 15 years. METHODS: Exclusion criteria were skin loss, devascularization, fractures, or flexor tendon injuries. Fifty patients who had sustained extensor tendon laceration with 53 digits injured were available for review. Treatment consisted of primary repair of the extensor tendon injury within the first 24 hours. The results were assessed by means of total active motion system and by Miller's rating system. The mean follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: Although 98% of the digits were rated as good or excellent according to the total active motion system and 95% according to Miller's classification, 22% of the fingers showed extension lag or loss of flexion at the last follow-up. DISCUSSION: Pejorative influencing factors were injuries in zones I, II, and III; children younger than 5 years (P < 0.05), and complete tendon laceration. Articular involvement had no significant influence on final outcome.     

Active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair: comparison of results following injuries in zone 2 and other zones

PURPOSE: To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. METHODS: The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. RESULTS: There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p < 0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed.     

Parachute technique: a complimentary method in zone II tendon repair

Flexor tendon lacerations still represent a challenging problem for the hand and the plastic surgeon, particularly in zone II. Many techniques have been devised accordingly to make the surgery of this zone easier. Hence, we too have devised an added complementary technique (ie, the parachute technique) to the common surgical techniques of the tendon repair to ease the repairing process and improve the outcomes. In this study, 79 patients, from whom 21 patients had 2 injured fingers, with flexor tendon injury in zone II (ie, 100 fingers) underwent this new technique. Finally, the results were hopeful. Thus, this complementary parachute technique combined with an early active mobilization with almost full range of flexion and extension, starting on the first postoperative day, resulted in improved outcomes compared with both passive mobilization and gentle active mobilization with a limited range of motion (ie, "controlled"). The Strickland formula (total active motion) system was used to evaluate the functional results of the flexor tendon repair. Finally, this technique is applicable for tendon repairs, and is shown to produce good results in their hands.     

Functional evaluation after primary flexor tendon repair in zone II

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of primary treatment of flexor tendon laceration in zone II according to Verdan's zone system. Special emphasis was given to the postoperative rehabilitation program. Nineteen patients (23 fingers) with laceration of the flexor tendons in zone II were treated operatively. Twelve males and seven females were included in the study. Their mean age was 28 years (range, 16 to 50 years). In 12 cases a concomitant laceration of the digital nerve was present. In all cases primary repair of all injured tendons and nerves was performed and a dorsal splint was applied. On the third to fifth postoperative day an exercise program commenced involving passive flexion-active extension of the injured fingers. Eighteen (22 fingers) of 19 patients completed the follow-up. The results were evaluated according to Strickland's original classification system. The result was excellent in 15 cases, good in five and fair in two. After primary repair of injured flexor tendons, a program of close follow-up, early protected motion and unrestricted motion of the interphalangeal joints offers the best chance of restoring optimal function to the hand.     

Direct end-to-end repair of flexor pollicis longus tendon lacerations.

Between 1976 and 1986, 38 consecutive acute isolated flexor pollicis longus lacerations were repaired. This study excluded all replanted or mutilated digits and all lacerations with associated fracture. Average follow-up was 26 months. Tendon rehabilitation was standardized. Range of motion and pinch strength were measured postoperatively. Seventy-four percent (28/38) of the flexor pollicis longus injuries occurred in zone II. Neurovascular injury occurred in 82% of the lacerations, and this correlated with the zone of tendon injury. In 21% of the patients (8/38) both digital nerves and arteries were transected. Postoperative thumb interphalangeal motion averaged 35 degrees and key pinch strength was 81% that of the uninjured thumb. One rupture occurred in a child. Laceration of the flexor pollicis longus is likely to involve damage to neurovascular structures, and repair may be necessary. Direct end-to-end repairs within the pulley system do at least as well as delayed tendon reconstruction and do not require additional procedures.     

The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilization.

Five hundred and eight patients with 840 acute complete flexor tendon injuries in 605 fingers in zones 1 and 2 underwent surgery and postoperative mobilization in a controlled or early active motion (active flexion-active extension) regimen over a period of 7.5 years. Sixty-eight patients with 79 finger flexor divisions who did not complete the rehabilitation programme were excluded. Of the 440 patients with 728 complete tendon divisions in 526 fingers included in the study, 23 patients ruptured 28 tendon repair(s) in 23 fingers, an overall rupture rate of 4%. One hundred and twenty-nine fingers with zone 1 injuries had a rupture rate of 5%. Three hundred and ninety-seven fingers with zone 2 injuries had a rupture rate of 4%. This study analyses the 23 patients with flexor tendon rupture(s) to identify causative factors. In approximately half of these patients, tendon rupture followed acts of stupidity. The implications of this are discussed. There was no significant relationship between tendon rupture and the age or sex of the patients, smoking or delay between injury and tendon repair and there was no particular prevalence of zone 2C level injuries among the fingers in which tendon rupture occurred.     

Flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation in zone II open sheath technique versus closed sheath technique

A comparative prospective study of the surgical management of the tendon sheath after repair of flexor tendons in zone II is reported. The study included only patients with lacerations of both flexor tendons and no other associated injuries. A modified Kessler suture was used to repair the profundus tendon and the superficialis tendon was repaired with a horizontal mattress suture. In 48 fingers the flexor tendon sheath was left open and it was closed in the second group of 42 fingers. When it was impossible to close the tendon sheath, a vein patch was taken from the dorsal veins of the hand. Both groups of patients were treated with the same regimen of controlled motion rehabilitation and supervised by the same hand therapist. Results were evaluated by the Strickland formula for total active motion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints. There was no statistical difference between the results of open sheath versus closed sheath in these two groups of patients treated postoperatively with the same controlled motion rehabilitation program.     

Complications experienced in the rehabilitation of zone I flexor tendon injuries with dynamic traction splinting

A retrospective review of all flexor tendon repairs done between January 1985 to June 1987 determined the complication rate with our method of rehabilitation. One hundred sixty-three flexor tendon lacerations in 83 patients were reviewed. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 42 months. All patients participated in the same 12-week rehabilitation protocol. All patients had passive motion exercises of the interphalangeal joints in the first 2 weeks. We believe that passive stretching of zone I injuries during the first 2 weeks contributed to the zone I complication rate. Of the 20 patients with zone I tendon-to-tendon repairs, 7 patients had significant complications. The 35% complication rate found with zone I injuries has prompted us to modify our postoperative rehabilitation protocol in zone I injuries.     

Prognostic factors for digital range of motion after intrasynovial flexor tendon injury and repair: Long-term follow-up on 273 patients treated with active extension-passive flexion with rubber bands

Study DesignObservational cohort study.IntroductionInvestigating prognostic factors using population-based data may be used to improve functional outcome after flexor tendon injury and repair.Purpose of the StudyThe aim of this study is to investigate the effect of concomitant nerve transection, combined flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon transection and the age of the patient, on digital range of motion (ROM) more than 1 year after FDP tendon transection and repair in zone I and II.MethodsTwo hundred seventy-three patients with a total of 311 fingers admitted for FDP injury in zone I and II were treated with active extension-passive flexion with rubber bands and followed for at least 1 year. We compared outcome by evaluating digital mobility using Strickland's evaluation system.ResultsAt 12 months 72% of patients aged > 50 had fair or poor ROM compared to 17% of patients aged 0-25 years. At 24 months the results for patients aged > 50 had improved to 33% with fair or poor ROM, whereas no improvement had occurred for patients aged 0-25 (17% with fair or poor ROM). Concomitant nerve transection and FDS tendon transection had no negative effects on digital mobility.DiscussionAge above 50 was significantly associated with impaired digital ROM during the first year after flexor tendon injury and repair but not at 2 years follow-up. Concomitant nerve transection and combined transection of FDP and FDS do not affect digital mobility.ConclusionsOlder patients are likely to have a slower healing process and impaired digital ROM during the first year after surgery.     

A comparative analysis of the outcome of flexor tendon repair in the index and little fingers: does the little finger fare worse?

The clinical and hand therapy notes of 180 patients who had single digit flexor tendon repairs in zones I and II from January 2000 to December 2004 were reviewed. Data from 60 index and 108 little fingers at 5 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks follow-up visits were included. In zone I injuries, there was a statistically significant difference in flexion contracture (worse in the little fingers ) at all follow-up points. Although the range of motion and percentage of patients in the excellent category of the Strickland and Glogovac criteria were greater in the index finger group than the little finger for zone I and II injuries, these differences were not statistically significant. The rupture rate was also higher in the little finger group.     

Immediate active mobilisation after flexor tendon repairs in Verdan's zones I and II. A prospective study of 20 cases

The authors report their experience with early active mobilisation after repair of complete sections of the flexor tendons within the digital tendon sheath. This is a prospective study carried out over 2 years and represents 20 repairs. The tendons were repaired using a double-loop looking suture of Tsuge (with PDS 4/0) associated with a peritendinous overrun using Prolene 6/0 via a volar Bruner-type incision. Post-operatively, a plaster splint holding the wrist in 30 degrees of flexion, the MP joints in 90 degrees of flexion and allowing complete active flexion of the finger protected the suture site. As soon as the dressings could be reduced (the 5th day post-operatively), the patient was encouraged to actively and synchronously flex all the fingers together as many times as possible during the day. After removal of the plaster splint at one month, the patients were entrusted to a physiotherapist with a view to regain full extension of the wrist and the fingers. We did not note a single case of breakdown of the repair. The mean active mobility (TAM according to Strickland) of the repairs in zone I was of the order of 70% while that for repairs in zone II was 85%. Immediate active mobilisation was not found to compromise, in any way, the results of associated digital nerve repairs. Despite the modest results, this simple-to-understand protocol is directed at present for injuries with a poor initial prognosis (contused and lacerated tendons, associated fractures, and non-motivated patients). Improvement in the quality of suture material should, in future, extend the indications for immediate active mobilisation to all fresh sutures of the flexor tendons.     

Two-stage reconstruction for flexor tendon injuries in zone II using a silicone rod and pedicled sublimis tendon graft

We report the results of staged flexor tendon reconstruction in 12 patients (12 fingers) with neglected or failed primary repair of flexor tendon injuries in zone II. Injuries involved both flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum sublimis (FDS), with poor prognosis (Boyes grades II–IV). The procedure included placing a silicone rod and creating a loop between the FDP and FDS in the first stage and reflecting the latter as a pedicled graft through the pseudosheath created around the silicone rod in the second stage. At a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 12–30 months), results were assessed by clinical examination and questionnaire. The mean total active motion of these fingers was 188°. The mean power grip was 80.0% and pinch grip was 76% of the contralateral hand. The rate of excellent and good results was 75% according to the Buck-Gramcko scale. These results were better than the subjective scores given by the patients. Complications included postoperative hematoma in two, infection in one, silicone synovitis in one (after stage I) and three flexion contractures after stage II. This study confirmed the usefulness of two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction using the combined technique as a salvage procedure to restore flexor tendon function with a few complications.     

Use of a relative motion flexion orthosis after epitendinous zone II flexor tendon repair: A case report

Study designCase reportIntroductionRelative motion flexion (RMF) orthoses are emerging as an option for early active motion (EAM) postoperatively.Purpose of the studyTo describe the rationale and implementation of an RMF orthosis to manage a patient after partial zone II epitendinous flexor tendon repairs.MethodsThis case involves a female who sustained partial flexor tendon lacerations to her middle finger in zone II, 60% flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and 90% flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). After epitendinous repair she was referred to therapy for EAM with a no orthosis request. The unusual circumstances prompted the therapist, concerned about the risk of tendon rupture to engage in discussion with the surgeon. Following discussion, a decision was made to use an RMF orthosis for controlled EAM to protect the epitendinous zone II FDS and FDP repairs. Outcomes of range of motion (ROM), total active motion (TAM), %TAM, grip, and quickDASH are reported.ResultsNeither the FDP or FDS tendons ruptured, nor were there any joint contractures. “Good” %TAM outcomes were achieved at 12-week postoperatively. Quick DASH scores improved 61 points indicating a clinically meaningful difference of improved function.DiscussionThe lack of a multi-strand core suture repair is unusual in combination with EAM. The positive outcomes reported in this single patient have raised questions about the protective benefit of the RMF orthosis when used with a zone II epitendinous repair of a 90% FDP laceration. Epitendinous repair of a partial (60%) FDS injury, however, is not uncommon and often not repaired at all.ConclusionsIn this single case report the epitendinous repairs of zone II 90% FDP and 60% FDS with digital nerve involvement were successfully managed with an RMF only orthosis. The use of EAM with an epitendinous repair is in conflict to the current surgical and therapy literature.     

Cyclical testing of zone II flexor tendon repairs

Kessler, Strickland, or modified Becker repairs, all augmented with a running circumferential epitenon suture, were performed for simulated zone II flexor tendon lacerations in the index, long, and ring fingers of 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. Each hand was tested with a tensiometer built for curvilinear testing of human flexor tendons in an intact hand. Each tendon was cycled 100 times, then examined for gapping before testing to failure. Maximum load to failure, including tendon load and pinch force, was recorded for each tendon. We propose that combining the advantages of cyclical testing and a curvilinear model is the most effective way of testing flexor tendon repairs capable of undergoing an early active motion protocol. None of the repaired tendons failed during the cyclic portion of testing. The average gapping after cycling for the 3 suture techniques was 0.12 +/- 0.35 mm for the Kessler technique, 0. 00 +/- 0.00 mm for the Strickland technique, and 0.19 +/- 0.26 mm for the modified Becker technique. The maximum tendon loads to failure were 33.8 +/- 6.8 N for the Kessler technique, 30.4 +/- 5.64 N for the Strickland technique, and 76.3 +/- 9.02 N for the modified Becker technique. There was a statistically significant difference between the modified Becker repair and the other 2 repairs for maximum tendon load and pinch force to failure. The results of this study show that all 3 tendon repair techniques can withstand forces reported with passive motion, but only the modified Becker repair allows sufficient strength above those forces that are estimated for active motion during tendon healing.