Computer Modeling of DDD Pacemakers for Use in Prophylaxis of Junctional Reentry Tachycardia

A computer simulation model of cardiac rhythm and heart-pacemaker interactions has been used to examine the response of short AV delay DDD pacing to an atrial premature depolarization in patients with a potential junctional reentry circuit. Special attention was given to the possibility of using the pacemaker to prevent atrioventricular reentry tachycardia mediated by a bidirectional accessory pathway. The computational experiments examined: (a) the differences between pacing modes with constant and quasi-Wenckebach prolongation of AV delay; (b) the effects of imposing therestrictions of a pacemaker atrial refractory period and upper rate limit; and (c) the effects of varying the ventricular refractory period so that it was either the same or longer than that of the atria. The computational results prove that some possible modes of initiation of functional reentry tachycardia are beyond theprophylactic capabilities of current DDD pacemakers. Future possibilities involving theuse of computer modeling to develop more sopbisticated pacemaker modes are briefly discussed.     

Pacing Techniques in the Prophylaxis of Junctional Reentry Tachycardia

Atrial premature beats (APBs) which encounter sufficient AV delay may initiate junctional reentry tachycardia (JRT). This form of initiation may be prevented by rendering part of the reentry circuit refractory by artificial stimulation following an APB which would otherwise initiate JRT. Two such approaches have been suggested: preexcitation pacing, that is, ventricular stimulation with a short AV delay triggered by atrial depolarization; and preemptive pacing, which consists of early atrial stimulation coupled to the initiating APB. We compared these approaches and describe them as follows. Ten patients with JRT (six with atrioventricular reentry and four with AV nodal reentry) were studied. Against a background of regular atrial drive, the range of coupling intervals over which a stimulated APB initiated JHT (tachycardia initiation window) was determined (control). The tachycardia initiation window was also measured when a second atrial stimulus followed the initiating APB 20 ms after atrial recovery (preemptive pacing) or when a ventricular stimulus closely followed the initiating APB with an AV delay of 65 ms (preexcitation pacing). The tachycardia initiation window in response to an isolated APB was also assessed following regular AV pacing with a short (65 ms) AV delay (preconditioning pacing) and the effect of preexcitation pacing following the initiating APB was also assessed after a similar drive (combined preconditioning and preexcitation pacing). All protocols were performed at two basic drive cycle lengths. The results are arranged for the slow and fast drives, respectively, and were as follows: control initiating windows—49.5, 28.5 ms; preemptive pacing initiation windows—151, 38 ms; preexcitation pacing initiation windows—26, 23.5 ms; preconditioning pacing initiation windows—45.5, 35 ms; combined preconditioning and preexcitation pacing initiation windows—10.0, 2.5 ms. Whereas preemptive pacing tended to widen the tachycardia initiation windows (a proarrhythmic effect) the combination of preconditioning and preexcitation pacing considerably reduced the possibility of JRT initiation by an atrial premature beat.     

A New Algorithm to Solve Endless Loop Tachycardia in DDD Pacing: A Multi-Center Study of 91 Patients

ELTs (endless loop tachycardias) are a common occurrence associated with DDD pacing. In order to detect and treat ELTs, an innovative automatic pacemaker algorithm was devised and evaluated. The basic principle of the algorithm rests on the relative stability of the ventriculoatrial conduction time (VACT) during ELTs. ELTs are suspected when the VACT remains stable and adheres to certain programmable limits referred to as VACT stability (16 or 31 msec); it is confirmed when the VACT remains stable after a programmable shortening of the AV delay (AVD) value, referred to as AVD shortening (47 or 63 msec). Ninety-one patients, 54 males and 37 females, were implanted with such an algorithm-specific device between January 10 and September 9, 1989. The reasons for implantation were as follows: 55 patients were implanted for AV block, 31 for sinus node dysfunction, and 2 for carotid sinus syndrome. Pacing parameters were programmed to favor ELT initiation (long AVD, short postventricular atrial refractory period [PVARP] and high atrial sensitivity) followed by basic programming of the algorithm (VACT stability set at 16 msec and AVD shortening set at 47 msec. Once this was done, a 24-hour Holter recording was obtained. Eighty-eight patients were thus analyzed, three being excluded from the final report due to the poor quality of the Holter tracings. In 43.2% of the sampling (38 patients), multiple episodes of ELT were identified, exhibiting a mean rate of 120 beats/min. In 26 of 38 cases (68.4%), the rate of ELT was found to be slower than the upper rate limit (URL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Limitations to Activation of the Antitachycardia Burst Pacing Function of the Symbios 7008 Pacemaker in the Universal (DDD) Mode

The Symbios 7008 antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in five patients for control of supraventricular tachycardia. Shortly after implantation in the first two patients, it was noted that the burst pacing sequence was not automatically activated by tachycardia when the pacemaker was in the DDD mode. Data from these two and the subsequent three patients were evaluated to explain this observation. The problem was primarily related to the operation of the device during the postventricular atrial refractory period. In all patients, the atrial electrogram encroached upon the programmed postventricular atrial refractory period because VA conduction during SVT was less than the lowest programmable interval (155 ms). Atrial events occurring during this interval will not trigger the tachycardia termination sequence. In all five patients, the size of the atrial electrogram decreased substantially (48 +/- 10%; mean +/- SD) during supraventricular tachycardia compared to sinus rhythm. In at least two of the five patients, decreased atrial size during supraventricular tachycardia may also have resulted in intermittent failure of atrial sensing during tachycardia, even at the most sensitive setting (0.6 mV). The latter may remain a problem even if the technical fault in SVT detection in the DDD mode were corrected. Two related problems were noted in the DDD mode: ventricular events during rapid SVT do not reset the low rate interval, resulting in random low rate pacing; and, automatic prolongation of atrial refractory period by two successive ventricular events without an intervening atrial sensed event compounds problems of atrial sensing. All of these problems were easily circumvented in all patients by noninvasive reprogramming to the DVI mode in which supraventricular tachycardia detection is based on ventricular sensing. These findings have implications for the future design of such devices.     

A New Approach to the Prevention of Endless Loop Tachycardia in DDD and VVD Pacing

Endless loop tachycardia (ELT) is a possible complication in dual chamber pacing; it is usually prevented by programming the atrial refractory period (PVARP) longer than the retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction interval; this in some patients limits the upper rate. In 15 patients with a DDD (nine patients) or a single-pass lead VDD pacemaker (six patients) and retrograde atrial activation, telemetric recording documented a significant difference in amplitude of antegrade, and retrograde atrial potentials (VDD 1.21 ± 0.32 mV vs 0.56 ± 0.23 mV, P = 0.008; DDD 2.7 ± 1 vs 1.8 ± 1 mV, P - 0.038; Student's t-test for paired data). In 3/15 patients ELT stopped after programming of atrial sensitivity to a value. greater than the retrograde P wave amplitude; in 11/15 patients this occurred at a sensing value lower than or equal to retrograde P wave amplitude with a high pass band filter operating. One patient required PVARP lengthening. Holter monitoring showed no more ELTs. In most patients with a DDD or single-pass lead VDD pacemaker with widely programmable sensing amplitude and Hi/Low bandpass filters. individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity prevents ELT without affecting the PVARP and, consequently, upper rate limit.     

Intermittent Pacemaker Syndrome: Revision of VVI Pacemaker to a New Cardiac Pacing Mode for Tachy-Brady Syndrome

A patient with tachy-brady syndrome manifested by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic sinus bradycardia and treated by VVI pacing developed pacemaker syndrome during episodes of ventricular pacing. His cardiac pacemaker was revised to a dual chamber system utilizing the new AV sequential DDI pacing mode which eliminated pacemaker-related tachycardias and totally abolished the pacemaker syndrome symptoms. There have been no further episodes of atrial fibrillation, possibly due to elimination of temporal dispersion of refractory periods during bradycardia. The propensity for atrial fibrillation has also been minimized by excluding competitive atrial stimulation during DVI pacing. The DDI mode provides the clinician increased utility and flexibility in the use of AV sequential pacing therapy.