Gait analysis of walking before and after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Introduction

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. HTO shifts the weight-bearing line from the medial compartment into the lateral compartment. The aim of this study was to investigate the functional biomechanical consequences of this alteration in alignment.

Methods

Eleven male patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis underwent three-dimensional gait analysis during level walking before 12 months and after medial opening wedge HTO. Nine male control subjects of a similar age were also tested using the same protocol. Sagittal and coronal angles and moments in both operated and non-operated knees were compared. Pre and postoperative radiographic coronal plane alignment was also measured.

Results

Walking speed increased significantly postoperatively (P = 0.0001) and was not different from controls. Preoperatively, maximum knee flexion in stance was reduced compared to control (P = 0.02). Postoperatively, maximum knee flexion increased significantly (P = 0.005) and was the same as the controls. Similar changes were observed for the maximum knee flexion moment. The mean maximum varus angle during stance was reduced from 13.5° preoperatively to 5.4° postoperatively (P = 0.0001) compared to (6.8°) in controls. The mean maximum adduction moment also reduced from 3.9 to 2.7 (% Bw/ht, P = 0.02), compared to 3.6 in control subjects. Interestingly, the adduction moments in the non-operated knee increased postoperatively from 3.3 to 4.1 (% Bw/ht, P = 0.02). The mean radiological mechanical alignment was changed from 172 degrees preoperatively to 180 degrees postoperatively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

HTO resulted in normalisation of several dynamic knee function parameters such as walking speed, knee flexion and external knee flexion moment. As anticipated, HTO reduced the varus angle and adduction moments of the operated knee. An increased adduction moment in the non-operated knee over the first postoperative year was found.

Level of evidence

Prospective case–control clinical laboratory study, Level III.     

The effect of lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy on medial knee opening: clinical and biomechanical factors

Purpose

The case of a patient with knee valgus and instability due to combined ACL–MCL laxity who underwent lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is presented. The symptoms of instability resolved following the surgery. It was unclear whether the increase in valgus stability was related only to a decrease in valgus moments during stance or also to a medial tensioning effect. We therefore performed a laboratory cadaveric study. The purpose of this study was to examine whether after MCL and ACL sectioning, lateral opening wedge DFO would result in decrease in medial opening under static conditions of valgus stress.

Methods

Medial knee opening under valgus load of 9.8 Nm was tested in 8 cadaveric specimens in scenarios of MCL and ACL sectioning and compared before and after performing lateral opening wedge DFO.

Results

When the superficial MCL was sectioned, medial knee opening in 30° flexion decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO compared to medial opening before the osteotomy (i.e. from 6.5 ± 0.5° to 5.6 ± 0.5°, p = 0.01). When the superficial MCL, deep MCL, and ACL were all sectioned, medial knee opening in extension decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO compared to medial opening before the osteotomy but this was not significant (i.e. from 6.8 ± 0.5° to 6.1 ± 0.5°, p = n.s.).

Conclusion

In superficial MCL-transected knees, medial laxity at 30° of knee flexion decreased after lateral opening wedge DFO. However, the clinical relevance of the laxity decrease observed remains uncertain since the reduction was small in magnitude.

Level of evidence

Controlled laboratory study.     

Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) positions the femoral component at the natural angle and level of the distal (0°) and posterior (90°) joint line. This technique applies referencing guides at 0° and 90° that are adjusted to compensate for wear and kerf and perform resections equal in thickness to the femoral component. Knowing whether femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable would assist in establishing general guidelines for adjusting the resection level of these two referencing guides. This study tests the hypothesis that femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the varus and valgus osteoarthritic knee treated with TKA.

Methods

The study consists of 205 patients and 208 knees with Kellgren–Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritis and treated with a TKA. Each knee had a narrow slice (2 mm) preoperative 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance image in the sagittal plane. Femoral bone and cartilage wear at 0° and 90° was computed from best-fit circles superimposed on the peripheral boundary of the subchondral bone on the medial and lateral femoral condyles.

Results

Overall, 99.5 % of knees had minimal bone wear (<1 mm) at 0° and 90°. In the 74 % (154 of 208) of knees with a varus deformity, 92 % at 0° and 2 % at 90° had >1 mm cartilage wear on the medial femoral condyle. In the 26 % (54 of 208) of knees with a valgus deformity, 78 % at 0° and 55 % at 90° had ≥1 mm cartilage wear on the lateral femoral condyle.

Conclusions

As a general guideline, adjustment for femoral bone wear is rarely required when performing kinematically aligned TKA. Most osteoarthritic knees require adjustment of the distal referencing guide to compensate for cartilage wear on the medial femoral condyle in the varus knee and the lateral femoral condyle in the valgus knee. Adjustment of the posterior referencing guide is required in about half of valgus osteoarthritic knees to compensate for lateral cartilage wear at 90°. Knowing that bone wear is rare and cartilage wear is predictable in varus and valgus Kellgren–Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritic knees helps establish general guidelines for adjusting the distal and posterior femoral referencing guides to restore the natural angle and level of the femoral joint lines when performing kinematically aligned TKA with generic instruments.

Level of evidence

IV.     

The relationship between patellofemoral and tibiofemoral morphology and gait biomechanics following arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy

Purpose

To examine the relationship between tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint articular cartilage and subchondral bone in the medial and gait biomechanics following partial medial meniscectomy.

Methods

For this cross-sectional study, 122 patients aged 30–55 years, without evidence of knee osteoarthritis at arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy, underwent gait analysis and MRI on the operated knee once for each sub-cohort of 3 months, 2 years, or 4 years post-surgery. Cartilage volume, cartilage defects, and bone size were assessed from the MRI using validated methods. The 1st peak in the knee adduction moment, knee adduction moment impulse, 1st peak in the knee flexion moment, knee extension range of motion, and the heel strike transient from the vertical ground reaction force trace were identified from the gait data.

Results

Increased knee stance phase range of motion was associated with decreased patella cartilage volume (B = ?17.9 (95 % CI ?35.4, ?0.4) p = 0.045) while knee adduction moment impulse was associated with increased medial tibial plateau area (B = 7.7 (95 % CI 0.9, 13.3) p = 0.025). A number of other variables approached significance.

Conclusions

Knee joint biomechanics exhibited by persons who had undergone arthroscopic partial meniscectomy gait may go some way to explaining the morphological degeneration observed at the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral compartments of the knee as patients progress from surgery.

Level of evidence

III.     

Knee braces and foot orthoses multimodal treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundKnee braces and lateral wedge foot orthoses are two treatment options recommended for medial knee osteoarthritis, but the combination of both of them could further improve their effectiveness.Research questionThe aim was to evaluate whether the combination of lateral wedge foot orthoses with two types of knee brace enhances the biomechanical effects and pain relief during the stance phase of gait while maintaining comfort.MethodsTen patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were fitted with a standard valgus brace, an unloader brace with valgus and external rotation functions, and 7° lateral wedge foot orthoses. The pain relief, comfort, kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb were measured during walking without orthotics, with the combined and with the isolated treatments.ResultsThe valgus and external rotation brace significantly reduced the knee adduction moment and allowed more knee flexion both in isolation and in combination to foot orthoses compared to the valgus brace or without treatment. Pain relief was not significant with the different orthotic treatment modalities. The valgus brace and combined treatment with either brace significantly increased the discomfort level, whereas the valgus and external rotation brace or foot orthoses in isolation did not induce significant discomfort.SignificanceAmongst the tested orthotic treatment modalities, the valgus and external rotation brace obtained better biomechanical outcomes while maintaining comfort. The combined treatment with foot orthoses enhanced the effectiveness of the valgus brace, however foot orthoses may be unnecessary with the valgus and external rotation brace.     

Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of resected condyle thickness measurement, obtained with caliper, when verifying the accuracy of distal femoral bone resection in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Fifty-two total knee arthroplasties were performed to treat osteoarthritis with varus knee. The difference of caliper-measured thickness of resected medial and lateral femoral condyles after removal of cartilage from the lateral condyle was compared with radiographically measured values. The preoperative planned valgus cut angles and the postoperative femoral component valgus angles were compared.

Results

The difference of radiograph-measured thickness averaged 2.4 ± 2.2 mm and the difference of caliper-measured thickness averaged 2.0 ± 2.1 mm (r = 0.735, P < 0.001). The postoperative femoral component valgus angle averaged 4.8° ± 1.6° (range, 2.0°–7.6°). The difference between the valgus cut angle and femoral component valgus angle averaged ?0.3° ± 1.5°.

Conclusions

The confirmation of correspondence between the caliper-measured and radiographically measured thickness of resected condyles could verify the accuracy of distal femoral bone resection in total knee arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

III.     

Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints

Purpose

To investigate whether the static knee alignment affects articular cartilage ultrastructures when measured using T2 relaxation among asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Both knee joints (n = 96) of 48 asymptomatic volunteers (26 females, 22 males; 25.4 ± 1.7 years; no history of major knee trauma or surgery) were evaluated clinically (Lysholm, Tegner) and by MRI (hip–knee–ankle angle, standard knee protocol, T2 mapping). Group (n = 4) division was as follows: neutral (<1° varus/valgus), mild varus (2°–4° varus), severe varus (>4° varus) and valgus (2°–4° valgus) deformity with n = 12 subjects/group; n = 24 knees/group. Regions of interest (ROI) for T2 assessment were placed within full-thickness cartilage across the whole joint surface and were divided respecting compartmental as well as functional joint anatomy.

Results

Leg alignment was 0.7° ± 0.5° varus among neutral, 3.0° ± 0.6° varus among mild varus, 5.0° ± 1.1° varus among severe varus and 2.5° ± 0.7° valgus among valgus group subjects and thus significantly different. No differences between the groups emerged from clinical measures. No morphological pathology was detected in any knee joint. Global T2 values (42.3 ± 2.3; 37.7–47.9 ms) of ROIs placed within every knee joint per subject were not different between alignment groups or between genders, respectively.

Conclusion

Static frontal plane leg malalignment does not affect cartilage ultrastructure among young, asymptomatic individuals as measured by T2 quantitative imaging.

Level of evidence

Cross-sectional study, Level II-III.     

Bracing improves clinical outcomes but does not affect the medial knee joint space in osteoarthritic patients during gait

Purpose

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is commonly treated through the use of medial compartment unloading braces which have been shown to improve clinical symptoms. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of a medial compartment unloading brace on biomechanical measurements and clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that brace usage would lead to increased medial joint space and improved clinical outcomes.

Methods

Ten patients with medial compartment OA were prescribed a medial compartment unloading brace and underwent dynamic biplane radiograph imaging while walking with and without the brace. The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index was used to assess pain before brace wear and at the time of testing. The 3D position and orientation of the femur and tibia were determined using a model-based tracking technique.

Results

Patients saw an average improvement of 33 % in their WOMAC scores (p = 0.01). This study failed to detect any statistically significant changes in the functional joint space, knee kinematics, or contact centre location between the braced and unbraced condition (n.s.).

Conclusion

The data from this study, using a highly accurate (±0.6 mm and ±0.6°) 3D radiograph analysis of dynamic tibiofemoral motion, suggest that the brace is ineffective at increasing joint space. However, it was shown to be effective in improving clinical outcome and therefore should continue to be prescribed to patients even though the mechanism of its effectiveness remains unknown.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Unconstrained arthroplasty in type II valgus knees: posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining?

Purpose

Type II valgus knees are defined by medial collateral ligament laxity. This paper studies the results of posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) knee implants in type II valgus knees.

Methods

From 1999 to 2009, there were 100 type II valgus knees in 95 patients eligible for study (63 PS, 37 CR). Patients had prospectively collected clinical data up to 2 years after surgery.

Results

At 24 months after surgery, the CR group had reduced range of motion (PS: median 126.0°, CR: median 114°; n.s.) and a marginally but statistically significant increased valgus alignment (PS: median 5°, CR: median 6°; p = 0.011). Despite this, both groups produced equal and marked improvements in SF-36, function score and knee score of the Knee Society score, and Oxford knee score.

Conclusions

Overall, both PS and CR implants performed equally well in type II valgus knees at 24 months post-operatively. Further longer-term studies would be warranted to assess for late instability.

Level of evidence

Retrospective, Level III.     

The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the post-operative radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) surgery versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Sixty patients scheduled for a primary TKA were prospectively divided into PSI or conventional technique. Coronal and sagittal radiographic long limb films were taken post-operatively. The accepted values for normal alignment were 180° ± 3° for hip-knee-ankle angle; 90° ± 3° for coronal femoral component angle or coronal tibia component angle; 0° to 3° flexion for sagittal femoral component angle and 0° to 7° posterior slope for sagittal tibia component angle.

Results

For hip-knee-ankle angle, there were 21 % more outliers in the PSI group compared to the conventional group (p = 0.045). Most of these outliers had valgus deformity in the PSI group and varus deformity in the conventional group (p = 0.045). For implant placement, there was no difference in the proportion of outliers between the two groups. There was also no difference in the duration of surgery.

Conclusions

This study showed that PSI surgery is associated with a larger proportion of outliers for lower limb alignment. PSI surgery as an alternative to conventional TKA is not advisable.

Level of evidence

II.     

No influence of coronal laxity and alignment on lift-off after well-balanced and aligned total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

In vivo fluoroscopic analyses have revealed the kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including femoral condylar lift-off. This study asked whether differences in static varus–valgus laxity or coronal limb alignment after TKA affect lift-off under weight-bearing conditions. It was hypothesised that there is a correlation between coronal laxity or alignment and lift-off during walking.

Methods

The current study analysed nineteen subjects undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA performed by the measured resection technique. The varus–valgus laxity at knee extension was measured using a 150 N stress radiograph. The mechanical axis was measured using a full-standing radiograph. Continuous radiological images were taken while the subject walked on a treadmill, and the images during single-leg stance were analysed to determine the lift-off using a 3D-to-2D image-to-model registration technique.

Results

The average angle in varus/valgus stress was 6.8 ± 1.8°/6.6 ± 2.1°. No statistically significant differences were observed between the varus and valgus laxity. The average amount of lift-off was 0.7 ± 0.4 mm. The static varus–valgus laxity (n. s.) or the differences in the laxities (n. s.) on the stress radiograph did not influence lift-off. The weight-bearing ratio was achieved within the middle third of the knee in 90 % of subjects. Two outliers with valgus alignment (68 ± 1 %) demonstrated no significant difference in lift-off in comparison with the majority of the subjects (46 ± 9 %).

Conclusion

The static coronal laxity and alignment did not influence the lift-off under dynamic weight-bearing conditions after well-balanced and aligned cruciate-retaining TKA. Measured resection technique can produce sufficient coronal stability and alignment without significant lift-off during walking.

Level of evidence

IV.     

A case series of lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for valgus malalignment

Introduction

Lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is a rarely employed surgical technique used for the treatment of lateral knee pain and degeneration in the setting of genu valgum. There exists little evidence of the suitability of this procedure for patients requiring osteotomies with a small correction.

Materials and methods

A case series of 23 patients (24 knees) undergoing lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed between 2002 and 2008. A surgical technique avoiding the need for fibular osteotomy is described. Adverse events, patient-reported outcomes and radiographic measures of alignment were assessed at baseline, at 6 months postoperatively, and at time of final follow-up. A subgroup of 12 patients also underwent 3D gait analysis at the same time points.

Results

The mean follow-up was 52 months (±20.4). Statistically and clinically significant improvements were identified in the lower extremity functional scale [mean change (95 %CI) = 10 (2.4, 17.6)], and in the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score [mean change (95 %CI) = 10.9 (0.5, 21.4)]. Mechanical axis changed from 2.4 ± 2.4° valgus to 0 ± 2.6° varus (p<0.001), anatomical axis from 6.9 ± 2.8° to 4.7 ± 2.5° valgus (p < 0.001), with weight-bearing line offset changing from 60.2 ± 11.4 % to 49.5 ± 12.4 % (p < 0.001). Change in lateral tibial slope, from 6.5 ± 2.2° to 7.5 ± 2.3°, was very small and not statistically significant (n.s.). The peak knee adduction moment during gait significantly increased [mean change (95 %CI) = 0.72 %BW*Ht (0.42, 1.02), suggesting a medial shift in dynamic knee joint load. Two patients underwent total knee arthroplasty during the study period.

Conclusions

Lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is a viable surgical option for patients with lateral knee pain and valgus malalignment requiring small degrees of correction.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Knee kinematics is altered post-fatigue while performing a crossover task

Purpose

To examine the effect of a sequential fatigue protocol on lower extremity biomechanics during a crossover cutting task in female soccer players.

Methods

Eighteen female collegiate soccer players alternated between a fatigue protocol and two consecutive unanticipated crossover trials until fatigue was reached. Lower extremity biomechanics were evaluated during the crossover using a 3D motion capture system and two force plates. Repeated-measures ANOVAs analysed differences between three sequential stages of fatigue (pre, 50, 100 %) for each dependent variable (α = 0.05).

Results

Knee flexion angles at initial contact (IC) for pre (?32 ± 9°) and 50 % (?29 ± 11°) were significantly higher than at 100 % fatigue (?22 ± 9°) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). Knee adduction angles at IC for pre (9 ± 5°) and 50 % (8 ± 4°) were significantly higher (p = 0.006 and p = 0.049, respectively) than at 100 % fatigue (6 ± 4°).

Conclusions

Fatigue altered sagittal and frontal knee kinematics after 50 % fatigue whereupon participants had diminished knee control at initial contact. Interventions should attempt to reduce the negative effects of fatigue on lower extremity biomechanics by promoting appropriate frontal plane alignment and increased knee flexion during fatigue status.

Level of evidence

III.     

Effects of the use of oral contraceptives on hip and knee kinematics in healthy women during anterior stair descent

Purpose

Our aim was to evaluate the effects of the use of oral contraceptives (OC) on the hip and knee kinematics of healthy women during anterior stair descent.

Methods

Forty volunteers aged from 18 to 26 years were divided into two groups: 1—Group of women who had used OC for at least 3 months prior to evaluation (n = 20) and 2—Group of women who did not use OC (n = 20). The knee flexion/extension and abduction/adduction, hip flexion/extension, abduction/adduction and medial/lateral rotation excursions (degrees) were calculated for the dominant (supporting) limb during anterior stair descent. T tests for independent samples were used to compare the kinematic differences between the groups (α = 0.05).

Results

No significant difference was verified between the groups regarding the maximum excursion of knee flexion (n.s.) and abduction (n.s.) or hip flexion (n.s.), adduction (n.s.) and medial rotation (n.s.). When considering the knee flexion at 50°, no significant difference was verified between the groups regarding the excursion of knee abduction (n.s.) or hip flexion (n.s.) adduction (n.s.) and medial/lateral rotation (n.s.).

Conclusion

These results suggest that the use of OC does not influence the hip and knee kinematics during anterior stair descent. Therefore, the role of this medication as a protective factor against anterior cruciate ligament injuries remains questionable.

Level of evidence

III.     

Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) as assessed by the intraoperative use of knee navigation software during the surgical procedure.

Methods

Fifteen patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The first three patients were excluded from this study, as they were considered to be a warm up to set-up the procedure. All patients were operated on with a cemented posterior-stabilised prosthesis cruciate ligament-sacrificing by the same surgeon using the patient matched cutting jigs. The size of the implant, level of resection, and alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes were evaluated. An unsatisfactory result was considered an error ≥2° in both planes for each component as a possible error of 4° could result in aggravation.

Results

On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the tibial guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 1.5 (range 0–5°) and in the sagittal plane was 3.8 ± 2.4 (range 0–7.5°). On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the femoral guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 0.6 and in the sagittal was 3.7 ± 2.

Conclusion

On the basis of this preliminary experience the PSI system based only on data acquisition with A-P radiograms and RMN cannot be defined as accurate. In cases of the use of the custom made cutting jigs it is recommended to perform an accurate control of the alignment before making the cuts, for any step of the procedure.

Level of evidence

II.     

Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Intramedullary rods are widely used to align the distal femoral cut in total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesised that both coronal (varus/valgus) and sagittal (extension/flexion) cutting plane are affected by rotational changes of intramedullary femoral alignment guides.

Methods

Distal femoral cuts using intramedullary alignment rods were simulated by means of a computer-aided engineering software in 4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, and 12° of valgus in relation to the femoral anatomical axis and 4° extension, neutral, as well as 4°, 8°, and 12° of flexion in relation to the femoral mechanical axis. This reflects the different angles between anatomical and mechanical axis in coronal and sagittal planes. To assess the influence of rotation of the alignment guide on the effective distal femoral cutting plane, all combinations were simulated with the rod gradually aligned from 40° of external to 40° of internal rotation.

Results

Rotational changes of the distal femoral alignment guides affect both the coronal and sagittal cutting planes. When alignment rods are intruded neutrally with regards to sagittal alignment, external rotation causes flexion, while internal rotation causes extension of the sagittal cutting plane. Simultaneously the coronal effect (valgus) decreases resulting in an increased varus of the cutting plane. However, when alignment rods are intruded in extension or flexion partly contradictory effects are observed. Generally the effect increases with the degree of valgus preset, rotation and flexion.

Conclusion

As incorrect rotation of intramedullary alignment guides for distal femoral cuts causes significant cutting errors, exact rotational alignment is crucial. Coronal cutting errors in the distal femoral plane might result in overall leg malalignment, asymmetric extension gaps and subsequent sagittal cutting errors.

     

Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial

Purpose

A controversial discussion is held on using stabilizing knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. The current study investigated the influence of a stabilizing knee brace on results after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts.

Methods

A prospective randomized study was started including 64 patients divided into two equal groups and treated with or without a stabilizing knee brace for 6 weeks post-operatively. A follow-up examination 4 years after operation comprised IKDC 2000, KT1000 measurement, a visual analogue pain scale (VAS; scores 0–10) and radiographic evaluation. The t test for independent and paired samples and the Pearson’s Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05). The primary endpoint was the difference in IKDC classification.

Results

Eighty-one per cent of the patients were examined 4 years post-operatively. IKDC 2000 subjective (brace group 90.5 ± 8.9, braceless group 93.2 ± 6.1) and objective results (brace A 30 %, B 56 %, C 16 %; braceless A 32 %, B 48 %, C 20 %) and instrumental measurement of anteroposterior laxity with KT1000 (brace 0.6 ± 2.4 mm, braceless 1.8 ± 3.4 mm) showed no significant differences. VAS pain results were significantly better in the braceless group at 1.0 ± 1.2 versus 1.9 ± 1.4 under sports activity or heavy physical work (p = 0.015). There were no radiographic differences concerning osteoarthritic findings and tunnel widening between the groups.

Conclusion

Post-operative treatment with a stabilizing knee brace after ACL replacement showed no advantage over treatment without a brace at 4-year follow-up. The use of a knee-stabilizing brace after isolated ACL reconstruction with autologous patellar tendon graft is not recommended.

Level of evidence

II.     

Sagittal and coronal plane location of the popliteal artery in the open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Purpose

The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the sagittal and coronal plane location of the popliteal artery during the advancement of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and (2) to confirm the effect of osteoarthritis if it changes the relationship between the popliteal artery and posterior cortex.

Methods

Two hundred consecutive patients were enrolled, and we divided patients into two subgroups according to age and cartilage status in the radiologic report of magnetic resonance imaging (group I: 100 non-arthritic knees; group II: 100 arthritic knees). For prediction of the location of the popliteal artery during the operation, sagittal and coronal plane location along the osteotomy plane was evaluated.

Results

The distance between the posterior cortex of the osteotomy and popliteal artery was 13–14 mm on the sagittal plane, and the popliteal artery was located at an approximately 35 ± 5.5 mm portion from the starting point of the osteotomy on the coronal plane. The distance at the starting point of osteotomy was larger than at the end portion and prominent area. In comparison between groups I and II, group II showed a larger distance on the sagittal planes [osteotomy–vascular: 13.6 vs 14.4 (p = 0.01), fibula–vascular: 4.88 vs 6.5 (p < 0.01), and prominence–vascular: 4.3 vs 5.3 (p < 0.01)] compared to the group I.

Conclusions

Special caution and some protection should be given until the approximately 35 mm portion from the starting point of the posteromedial cortex with consideration for the approximity on the sagittal plane. In comparison between the non-arthritic and arthritic knee, differences were observed on the sagittal plane. However, the value was minimal, and the clinical relevance was questionable.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.     

The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design

Purpose

A safety study was conducted on a cohort of 25 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with a biconcave mobile-bearing insert.

Methods

The first 25 lateral mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements, performed in a general hospital by one surgeon, were prospectively reviewed, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

Results

One bearing dislocation occurred 4 months postsurgery. The Oxford knee score improved in all patients from a preoperative mean of 23.3 (range 8–40, SD 8.4) to a postoperative mean of 42.1 (range 23–48, SD 6.7). General patient satisfaction at a mean follow-up of 20 months was excellent in 84 %, good in 12 % and fair in 4 %. The mechanical axis as a measure on full-leg standing radiographs improved from 5.7° valgus (range 1°–16°, SD 4.1°) to 1.7° valgus (7° to ?3°, SD 2.1°). Mechanical alignment correction averaged 4.0° (range ?1° to 15°, SD 3.9°).

Conclusion

The mobile biconcave insert design in the lateral unicompartmental knee replacement seems appropriate as a innovative, anatomy imitating solution, resulting in a good clinical outcome. Still, bearing dislocation remains a concern, especially in extended indication.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.     

The accuracy of the extramedullary and intramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritic knee

Purpose

The intramedullary (IM) femoral alignment system does not alway guarantee accuracy of the component position in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In some cases, the extramedullary (EM) femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a useful alternative surgical option to adjust femoral component alignment. In the EM technique, accuracy of the femoral head center location is mandatory. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the alignment after TKA using two different femoral alignment systems.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2009, 91 patients (106 knees) with osteoarthritis underwent TKA. The IM femoral alignment system was used in 50 TKAs, and the EM system was used in 56 TKAs. We measured the coronal, sagittal alignment of the femoral component, and overall alignment from full-length standing. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken 1 year after surgery.

Results

The overall limb alignment was 0.2° ± 1.9° varus in the EM group and 1.1° ± 1.9° valgus in the IM group (p = 0.001). The coronal alignment of the femoral component was 90.0° ± 1.1° in the EM group and 90.3° ± 1.2° in the IM group, not statistically different (n.s.). The sagittal alignment of the femoral component was 2.3° ± 1.7° in the EM group and 2.5° ± 1.0° in the IM group (n.s.). Clinically acceptable overall limb alignment was achieved in 91.1 % of EM group and 84.0 % of IM group (n.s.).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that by applying our EM technique that uses a newly designed mechanical axis marker system, the alignment of the femoral component and overall limb alignment is reliable and at least as accurate as the standard IM technique.

Level of evidence

I.