Phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Fifty-five eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC (median age 62 and 90% of patients presented with metastasis) received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) intravenous infusion for 2 h, followed by intravenous infusion of 5-FU (3000 mg/m2) and leucovorin (100 mg/m2) for 46 h every 14 days until the patient's disease was either in progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient's withdrawal or the investigators' decision to discontinue treatment. Of the 55 enrolled patients, 48 were evaluable for response. Three patients (5.4%) showed complete remission and 20 patients (36.4%) achieved partial response. The overall response rate was 47.9%. Nineteen patients (34.5%) had stable disease and six patients (10.9%) showed progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.6 months and the median overall survival was 10.8 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (12.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.4%), diarrhoea (3.6%) and vomiting (9.1%). Peripheral neuropathy was noted in 61.8% of the patients (grade 1/2: 54.5%; grade 3: 7.3%). Our study confirmed that the combination of oxaliplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU/leucoverin without bolus 5-FU as first-line chemotherapy is active for patients with AGC and relatively safe with lower haematological toxicity.     

Pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin iv chronomodulated infusion combined with 5-fluorouracil iv continuous infusion in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary clinical results and toxicity of chronomodulated oxaliplatin (OHP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) without folinic acid (FA) in 13 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 5-FU (200 mg/m2/day as 14-day continuous iv infusion for six cycles) plus OHP at increasing doses (25-30-35 mg/m2/day, as 12 h chronomodulated iv infusion on days 1-2-3-4, every 14 days for six cycles) were administered to reach maximum tolerated dose (MTD). At MTD (30 mg/m2/day), a PK study of 5-FU and OHP (in total and ultrafiltered-UF plasma) was performed. 5-FU plasma levels were fairly stable, below that reported in similar studies and closely related to the lack of the most typical 5-FU toxicities. OHP Cmax occurred 7 h after infusion start; a progressive accumulation of free Pt and ultrafiltered Pt (UF-OHP) through cycles 1-6 was noted. A marked difference between total plasma and UF Pt was seen in the elimination phase. OHP plasma clearance decrease was related to Vz (volume of distribution of late elimination phase), whereas in UF-OHP was due to a change in Ke or t1/2. In conclusion, the association of 5-FU with chronomodulated OHP do not seem to influence PK parameters of either drugs. Toxicity was modest/acceptable and clinical efficacy good: preliminary data showed a threshold neurotoxicity at total plasma Pt concentrations >1500 ng/ml and UF plasma Pt concentrations >150 ng/ml.     

Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced solid tumors

This dose escalation, uncontrolled phase I study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of oral sorafenib 100, 200, or 400 mg twice daily (bid, continuous regimen) in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LCV, intravenous infusion or bolus) in patients with advanced, solid tumors. A total of 47 patients (median age 57 years; colon cancer, 55%; pancreatic cancer, 21%; prior systemic therapy, 96%) received treatment; 24 were included in the PK analyses, and 38 were evaluable for tumor response. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 98% of patients (≥grade 3, 55%); the most frequently reported were fatigue (51%), stomatitis/pharyngitis (47%), and hand-foot skin reaction (45%). Concomitant 5-FU/LCV resulted in no clinically relevant changes in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval (AUC(0-12)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of sorafenib (100-400 mg bid) at steady state. Although the start of infusion until the last quantifiable plasma concentration (AUC(0-tn)) and C(max) of 5-FU were increased by concomitant sorafenib 100 to 200 mg, no consistent effect was observed with 400 mg sorafenib. Two (5%) patients with colon cancer achieved partial response; 16 (42%) patients (the majority with colon and pancreatic cancer) had stable disease. Sorafenib plus 5-FU/LCV was generally well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity and no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in patients with advanced solid tumors.     

Phase I study of gefitinib, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFOX) in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Summary Purpose: Aphase 1 study of gefitinib in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFOX)was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib (250 mg or 500 mg once daily) in combination with FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin). The initial dose of oxaliplatin was 70 mg/m2 with sequential dose escalation to 85 mg/m2. Results: Sixteen patients received a total of 138 14-day courses of daily gefitinib in combination with FOLFOX. Escalation of gefitinib from 250 mg/d to 500 mg/d with FOLFOX was well-tolerated. In addition, no severe toxicities precluded subsequent dose escalation of oxaliplatin from 70 mg/m2 to 85 mg/m2 at which no dose-limiting toxicity was seen. No further dose escalation was performed as this represented the oxaliplatin dose administered in the standard FOLFOX-4 regimen. The most predominant toxicity was diarrhea, which was well controlled with oral antidiarrheal agents. Four partial remissions occurred in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Gefitinib as a 500 mg daily continuous dose was well tolerated in combination with full doses of FOLFOX-4.     

Phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil by 24-hour infusion weekly

A novel schedule of 5-fluorouracil administration has been developed for biochemical modulation studies. In combination with the pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor PALA, 5-fluorouracil has been given as a 24-hour infusion, repeated weekly: a dose of 2600 mg/m² is well tolerated. To identify a suitable dose of 5-fluorouracil as a single agent on this schedule, we treated 26 patients at doses ranging from 2800 to 3400 mg/m² per week. Two-thirds of the patients had failed previous therapy, and most were symptomatic from their disease. Over half of the patients had metastatic colorectal cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred at every level tested. Twenty-two of the 26 patients required therapy interruption because of toxicity. The severity of this toxicity indicated that escalation of 5-fluorouracil on this schedule beyond the 2600 mg/m² known to be tolerated in the PALA-containing regimen, would be impractical. Two patients, both with previously untreated colorectal cancer, had partial remissions lasting three and five months respectively. This dose-intense schedule of 5-fluorouracil administration will be explored further in large-scale randomized trials.     

Phase I dose-finding study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or other solid tumors

This phase I trial was initiated based on encouraging clinical data with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in the therapy of solid tumors. In this trial, G-FLIP has been modified to facilitate outpatient administration and to optimize sequence-dependent synergistic activity. Treatment consisted of biweekly (once every 14 days) cycles of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m, irinotecan per dose escalation schedule, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m and LV 300 mg on day 1 followed by a 24-h 5-FU infusion 1500 mg/m, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m on day 2. The irinotecan starting dose was 80 mg/m and escalated by 20 mg/m in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (13 men/10 women) with the following cancers: 11 pancreatic, five gallbladder, three squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one melanoma, one gastric, and one breast cancer. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-16) over five irinotecan dose levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 mg/m). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting despite aggressive anti-emetic therapy occurred in one patient at dose level 1 and three patients at dose level 3. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities per patient consisted of thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (23%), neutropenia (16%) and neutropenic fever (10%). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, one complete response (pancreatic) and eight partial responses (three gallbladder, two pancreatic, two head and neck, and one breast) were attained. Seven patients had disease stabilization (five pancreatic, one hepatocellular and one gastric) for a median of 16 weeks (range 10-22). Median time to disease progression among all 23 patients enrolled to the phase I portion of the trial was 20.5 weeks (range 4-37). We conclude that G-FLIP is a novel outpatient chemotherapy regimen with acceptable toxicity at the maximum tolerated irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m. The phase II trial of G-FLIP using an irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is ongoing.     

奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期大肠癌的临床观察

目的评价奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和大剂量氟尿嘧啶（5-FU）持续48 h静脉滴注治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效和安全性。方法32例大肠癌患者采用静脉滴注奥沙利铂100 mg/m^2,亚叶酸钙200 mg/m^2,亚叶酸钙滴注之后用5-FU 0．5 g静注,接着用5-FU 3．0 g/m^2持续静脉滴注48h,每2周1次,2次为1个周期。结果32例病例中,平均疗程数为4个周期,其中完全缓解（CR）1例,部分缓解（PR）15例,稳定（SD）12例,进展（PD）4例,总有效率（CR＋PR）为50%。不良反应为恶心、呕吐和骨髓抑制,但多为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度,一过性感觉异常。结论奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期大肠癌疗效较高,不良反应轻而且安全,患者容易耐受,值得推广使用。     

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with every second week cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer harboring wild-type KRAS. Patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m(2) biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in 5 patients. From May 2009 to February 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 patients who were treated with biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan, partial response was observed in 9 patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7%-49.4%) and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95% CI, 57.7%-90.0%). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 10.8 months. Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10.0%) and one treatment related death due to pneumonia was observed. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan was effective for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.     

多西紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂及氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析

目的观察多西紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗进展期胃癌的临床疗效及不良反应。方法96例进展期胃癌采用多西紫杉醇75mg/m2,第1d静脉输注1h;奥沙利铂100mg/m2,第1d静脉输注3h;亚叶酸0.2g/m2,第1d静脉输注2h;5-氟尿嘧啶2.4g/m2用便携式微量输液泵持续静脉输注48h,21d为1个周期。治疗2个周期后评价疗效和不良反应。结果96例患者均可评价,获得完全缓解（CR）3例,部分缓解（PR）39例,稳定（SD）33例,进展（PD）21例,总有效率（RR）为43.8%（42/96）,中位疾病进展时间（TTP）7.5个月,中位生存期11.4个月。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、腹泻、四肢末梢感觉异常,其中Ⅱ～Ⅲ度白细胞减少为65.7%（63/96）,Ⅱ～Ⅲ度血小板减少为34.4%（33/96）,Ⅰ～Ⅱ度神经毒性为56.3%（54/96）,Ⅰ～Ⅱ度腹泻为18.8%（18/96）。结论多西紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂、5-氟尿嘧啶方案治疗进展期胃癌疗效肯定,且毒副反应可以耐受,患者临床受益。     

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion

Purpose: Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration.Patients and methods: Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC 500 or platelet count 25,000 for 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used.Results: A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level.Conclusion: Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion

PURPOSE: Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC < or = 500 or platelet count < or = 25,000 for > or = 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used. RESULTS: A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

The prognosis for advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with a median survival of 9-12 months and 5-year-survival rate of 10-20%. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard therapy, but has a high potential of side effects and is usually not given on an ambulatory basis. This phase I study was designed to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly cisplatin in combination with standard doses of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), 30 min) and 5-FU (750 mg/m(2), 24 h)/folinic acid (200 mg/m(2), 30 min). All drugs were to be given on a day 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 6-weekly cycle in an outpatient setting. Nineteen chemonaive patients with inoperable stage IIa, III and IV squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled into the study. Eight, six and five patients were enrolled at cisplatin dose levels 0 (20 mg/m(2) ), I (25 mg/m(2) ) and II (30 mg/m(2)), respectively. One hundred and eighty-one out of 187 treatments (55 cycles) were given on an outpatient basis. The dose-limiting toxicities of this schedule were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Other side effects were mild. Dose level II (30 mg/m(2)) was defined as the MTD for cisplatin when used in this combination and schedule. Partial responses were observed in 10 of the 19 enrolled patients. The side effect profile seen in this study in combination with the preliminary evidence of efficacy justifies further testing in a phase II setting with a cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m(2) and offers a treatment option for patients in an outpatient setting.     

多西他赛联合奥沙利铂和5-氟尿嘧啶方案治疗晚期胃癌41例

目的:观察多西他赛联合奥沙利铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)方案治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效、毒副反应及生存状况。方法:收集2004-2010年我院41例晚期胃癌患者,多西他赛75 mg.m-2(d 1);奥沙利铂130 mg.m-2(d 2);5-Fu 400～500 mg.m-2.d-1,[d 2～d 5或持续泵入96 h(civ 96 h)],每21 d重复1次,至少2个周期。结果:总缓解率(ORR)为26.8%,疾病控制率(DCR)为78.0%。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.6个月(95%CI:3.52～7.6),中位总生存(OS)为12.3个月(95%CI:2.7～21.9)。1年生存率为46.3%(19/41);2年生存率为21.9%(9/41);3年生存率为7.3%(3/41)。常见的毒副反应为骨髓抑制(主要为白细胞及中性粒细胞减少)、胃肠道反应(恶心和呕吐)、腹泻和脱发等。结论:多西他赛联合奥沙利铂和5-FU方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效显著,毒副反应可耐受。化疗近期疗效是晚期胃癌PFS和OS的独立预后因素[危害比(HR):3.6;95%CI:1.8～7.3]。     

Phase II study of epirubicin plus oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil as first-line combination therapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an epirubicin, oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil combination in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with previously untreated advanced measurable gastric cancer received epirubicin (50 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 2-h infusion, day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2, 24-h infusion, day 1-3) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of this phase II study was the response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Out of 48 patients, 46 were evaluable for efficacy and 48 for toxicity. A median of five cycles (range 1-6) was administered. The overall best response rate was 47.8% (95% confidence interval 33-63%) including 2.2% complete responses and 45.6% partial responses. The median time for progression and median overall survival was 5 (95% confidence interval 4.1-5.9) and 11 months (95% confidence interval 8.1-13.9), respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukocytopenia were observed in 25 and 12.5% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included nausea (6.3%), vomiting (14.6%), neurological toxicity (10.4%) and mucositis (2.1%). The epirubicin, oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil regimen was effective and well tolerated as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer, and should be evaluated further.     

奥沙利铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究

目的观察奥沙利铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)和亚叶酸钙(CF)治疗晚期胃癌临床疗效及其不良反应。方法奥沙利铂100 m g/m 2,静脉滴注2 h,第1天;CF 400 m g/m 2,静脉滴注,第1天;5-FU 400 m g/m 2,静脉推注,第1天;后续5-FU 2600 m g/m 2,静脉持续输注46 h;每2周重复,应用4次奥沙利铂(8周)后判断疗效。结果46例患者中,完全缓解(CR)5例(11%),部分缓解(PR)18例(39%),稳定(SD)16例(35%),进展(PD)7例(15%),CR+PR共23例,近期客观有效率为50%。26例初治患者中,CR 5例,PR10例,SD 8例,PD 3例,有效率58%;20例复治患者中,CR 0例,PR 8例,SD 8例,PD 4例,有效率40%,中位缓解时间为5个月,中位生存期为9个月。主要毒副反应为神经毒性,恶心、呕吐、白细胞和血小板减少程度较轻。结论奥沙利铂联合5-FU/CF治疗晚期胃癌有较好的近期疗效,毒副反应轻而且安全。     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil: a phase II study in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown at least additivity with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5FU). We carried out this phase II study to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and levo-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5FU on day 2 (OXIRIFAFU) in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Forty-one patients, all previously treated with adjuvant and/or palliative 5FU-based chemotherapy (16 of them already exposed to IRI, OXA or both), were enrolled into this trial. On the basis of sensitivity to previous treatment, 19 patients were considered as chemo-resistant and 14 patients as chemo-refractory. OXA 110 mg/m (over 2 h) and IRI 175 mg/m (over 1 h) were delivered on day 1, followed by LFA 250 mg/m (2-h infusion) plus 5FU 800 mg/m as intravenous bolus on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. A total of 348 cycles were delivered, with a median of nine cycles per patient (range, 1-12 cycles per patient). Five complete and 13 partial responses were reported on 40 assessable patients, giving a response rate of 45% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29-62%]; eight of 19 (42%) resistant patients and five of 14 (36%) refractory patients achieved a major response, which was also obtained in four of eight (50%) patients pretreated with IRI and in three of eight (38%) patients pretreated with OXA. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 68% of patients, but febrile neutropenia or infections affected only seven (17%) patients. No episodes of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia or anemia were recorded. Occurrence of severe non-hematologic toxicities by patients were: diarrhea, 34%; vomiting, 17%; peripheral cumulative neuropathy, 15%; stomatitis, 10%; acute cholinergic syndrome, 7%. Actually delivered dose intensities of all three drugs resulted in about two-thirds of the planned ones. After a follow-up of 39 months, median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. Median overall survival was 14.4 (95% CI, 10.4-18.4) months from the start of OXIRIFAFU and 25.3 (95% CI, 18.1-32.5) months from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. This OXIRIFAFU triplet regimen was highly effective in resistant/refractory colorectal cancer patients. A slight dose reduction of all cytotoxic drugs could be advisable in order to improve the tolerability of this regimen without jeopardizing its activity.     

Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Summary   Purpose: This phase I trial assessed the safety and the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine given for 10 days prior to a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. It also evaluated the changes in cisplatin DNA adducts induced by capecitabine. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors who had not failed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) analogs or topoisomerase I inhibitors were eligible. All cohorts of patients first received a 28-day cycle of cisplatin and irinotecan. Both drugs were given at a dose of 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, followed by irinotecan on days 8 and 15 at the same dose. The first cycle served as an internal control. Starting from the second cycle, patients received increasing doses per cohort of capecitabine from day 1 to 10 of each cycle, followed by cisplatin on day 11 and irinotecan on days 11, 18 and 25, both at same doses as the first cycle. Cycles were repeated every 38 days. The starting dose of capecitabine was 500 mg/m²/day which was escalated by 250 mg/m²/day in the subsequent cohort of patients to reach the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Later, additional patients were treated at the MTD of capecitabine to further evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and tumor response. Patients blood was tested for cisplatin-DNA adducts to determine the impact of capecitabine on cisplatin-based therapy. Results: Fifteen patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment. At 1,250 mg/m², two DLT of prolonged neutropenia of grade ≥3 were observed. The MTD for capecitabine was thus determined to be 1000 mg/m²/day. Fatigue and diarrhea of grade 1 or 2 were the most frequent toxicities at this dose level. No significant hematologic toxicity was observed at the MTD. Two complete and three partial remissions were observed. Four of the responders had received a platinum agent and/or 5-FU in the past. Conclusions: A sequential treatment with capecitabine followed by cisplatin and irinotecan is well tolerated and demonstrates clinical activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The influence of capecitabine, if any, on the efficacy of the cisplatin-irinotecan combination is not related to a variation in cisplatin-DNA adducts. Previous presentations: C. F. Verschraegen, F. C. Lee, I. Rabinowitz, A. Mangalik, C. Jennings, A. Maestas, Z. Shen. Phase I and translational study of capecitabine, cisplatin, and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors. Proc ASCO, A2114, 2004 H. Sayar, C. Verschraegen, H. Smith, I. Rabinowitz, F. C. Lee, Z. Shen. Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Proc ASCO, AB-31962, 2008 Support: Supported by the Oxnard Foundation; Period of Support: 07/01/2003–06/30/2005