Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum

Background The authors present their experience with rectal cancers managed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Methods This prospective study investigated patients undergoing primary TEM excision for definitive treatment of rectal cancer between January 1996 and December 2003 by a single surgeon in a tertiary referral colorectal surgical unit. Results For this study, 52 patients (30 men and 22 women) underwent TEM excision of a rectal cancer. Their mean age was 74.3 years (range, 48–93 years). The median diameter of the lesions was 3.44 cm (range, 1.6–8.5 cm). The median distance of the lesions from the anal verge was 8.8 cm (range, 3–15 cm), with the tumor more than 10 cm from the anal verge in 36 patients. The median operating time was 90 min (range, 20–150 min), and the median postoperative stay was 2 days. All patients underwent full-thickness excisions. There were 11 minor complications, 2 major complications, and no deaths. The mean follow-up period was 40 months (range, 22–82 months). None of the pT1 rectal cancers received adjuvant therapy. Eight patients with pT2 rectal cancer and two patients with pT3 rectal cancer received postoperative adjuvant therapy. The overall local rate of recurrence was 14%, and involved cases of T2 and T3 lesions, with no recurrence after excision of T1 cancers. Three patients died during the follow-up period, but no cancer-specific deaths occurred. Conclusions The findings warrant the conclusion that TEM is a safe, effective treatment for selected cases of rectal cancer, with low morbidity and no mortality. The TEM procedure broadens the range of lesions suitable for local resection to include early cancers (pTis and pT1) and more advanced cancers only in frail people.     

Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in staging locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation

Aim  The aim of our study was to determine the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) in staging locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation and to point out the most common reasons for false interpretation. Methods  Forty-four patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical surgery. Restaging was done 1–2 weeks before surgery and the results of ERUS staging were compared with histopathology findings of the resected specimen. Results  The accuracy of ERUS for T stage after chemoradiation was 75% (33/44). Overstaging occurred in 18% (8/44) of patients, and 7% (3/44) were understaged. The majority of overstaging occurred in patients with ERUS T3 tumors, eventually found to have pathological pT0–pT2 staging. Five patients (11.4%) had complete histology regression and only one of these patients was staged correctly while others were overstaged. In the detection of perirectal lymph node metastases, ERUS was accurate in 68% of patients (30/44). Twenty percent (9/44) of patients were overstaged and 11% were (5/44) understaged. Conclusions  ERUS provides a good accuracy rate for staging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. However, it is insuficient in detection of complete pathological response.     

经肛门内窥镜下微创治疗直肠肿瘤40例初步经验

目的 评价经肛门内窥镜微创外科技术(TEM)治疗直肠宽基腺瘤和早期直肠癌临床效果.方法 分析2005年5月至2007年4月40例TEM手术的临床效果,结果 40例肿瘤直径中位值2.3 cm,肿瘤下缘距齿状线距离为(8.2±3.2)cm,肿瘤侵犯直肠周径范围为(32.3±18.5)%.平均手术时间为(90±43)min.平均住院4.8 d.无围手术期死亡.切缘瘤细胞均为阴性.病理示直肠绒毛状腺瘤24例、直肠腺癌10例、直肠类癌6例,10例腺癌中pTis2例,PT16例和pT22例.平均随访11个月,所有病例无局部复发.结论 TEM手术创伤小、保留肛门括约肌、缩短住院时间;既可作为直肠宽基腺瘤和pT1期直肠癌的治愈性手术,也可作为pT2直肠癌的姑息性治疗手段.     

Rectal endosonography can distinguish benign rectal lesions from invasive early rectal cancers

Objective To determine whether an experienced ultrasound examiner, using good ultrasound equipment with high multifrequency probes, can discriminate between a high grade or low grade dysplastic adenoma (pT0) and very early invasive rectal cancers (pT1). Subjects and methods Sixty consecutive patients with clinically possibly pT0 or pT1 rectal tumours referred for transanal local excision underwent endorectal ultrasound examination. Lesions where the endorectal ultrasound image showed the mucosal layer to be expanded but the submucosal layer to be intact (uT0) were considered to represent a low grade or high grade dysplasia adenoma (pT0). An irregularity or disruption of the submucosal layer (uT1) was considered to characterize early invasive rectal cancers (pT1). The ultrasound staging was compared with the histological staging made on the basis of the diagnoses in the excised specimens. Results The histopathological diagnoses were: invasive rectal cancer (n = 18, 10 pT1, 4 pT2, 4 pT3 cancers); high grade dysplastic adenoma (n = 21); low grade dysplastic adenoma (n = 18); non adenomatous benign lesions (n = 3). Endorectal ultrasound incorrectly classified two of the invasive cancers (both pT1 tumours) as noninvasive lesions. Five of 42 pT0 tumours were overstaged as uT1 tumours. Overstaging was more common in patients who had undergone a previous excision and in tumours with peritumoral inflammation and desmoplastic reaction. The sensitivity of endorectal ultrasound with regard to invasive cancer was 89% (16/18), specificity 88% (37/42), positive predictive value 76% (16/21), negative predictive value 95% (37/39), and accuracy 88% (53/60). Among pT0 and pT1 tumours, the corresponding figures were 80% (8/10), 88% (37/42), 62% (8/13), 95% (37/39), and 87% (45/52). Conclusion Endorectal ultrasound can distinguish between noninvasive lesions and invasive rectal cancers clinically of stage pT0 or pT1.     

Endorectal Ultrasonography and Treatment of Early Stage Rectal Cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative staging by endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) and its contribution to treatment of early stage rectal cancer (ESRC). The results of EUS for 154 consecutive patients with ESRC (pTis to pT2) were compared prospectively with histologic findings, assessed according to the TNM classification. Results of treatment selection and long-term outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. There were 35 patients histologically staged as pTis, 8 as pT1-slight (invasion confined to the superficial one-third of the submucosa), 37 as pT1-massive (invasion extending to the deeper submucosa), and 74 as pT2. The equipment used was an echoendoscope GF-UM2 or GF-UM3 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Sensitivity/specificity/overall accuracy rates for detection of slight submucosal invasion, massive submucosal invasion, and muscularis propria invasion were 99%/74%/96%, 98%/88%/97%, and 97%/93%/96%, respectively. Incidences of lymph node metastasis in pTis, pTis to pT1-slight, pT1, pT1-massive, and pT2 cases were 0%, 0%, 18%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. Incidences of lymph node metastasis in ESRCs staged by EUS (u) as uTis, uT1-slight, uT1-massive, uT2, and uT3 by EUS were 0%, 0%, 26%, 36%, and 64%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy rates for detection of positive nodes in overall ESRCs were 53%, 77%, and 72%, respectively. Of the 43 patients with pTis to pT1-slight tumors, 22 underwent endoscopic polypectomy or local excision, 20 radical surgery, and 1 radical surgery after endoscopic polypectomy due to vascular invasion. All these patients are alive and all but one (who refused radical surgery due to vascular invasion after local excision and developed liver and lung metastases) are disease-free. Of the 37 patients with pT1-massive tumors, 34 underwent radical surgery and 3 transcoccygeal segmental resection. All these patients are alive disease-free except for one who died of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical surgery. All patients with pT2 tumors underwent radical surgery. The overall 5-year survival rates for pTis, pT1, and pT2 cases were 100%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. EUS is an accurate method for evaluating invasion depth in ESRC. Patients with uTis or uT1-slight tumors staged by EUS are at low risk of positive nodes and good candidates for endoscopic polypectomy or local excision. Those with uT1-massive or uT2 lesions should be treated with a radical operation because of the high incidence of positive nodes. E-pub: 3 July 2000     

Selektion von Patienten mit Rektumtumoren zur lokalen Exzision aufgrund der präoperativen Diagnostik

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical staging (CS), biopsies, and endoluminal ultrasonic examination (EUS) in preoperative staging of rectal tumors treated with transanal local excision. This local excision is an adequate procedure for benign rectal polyps and low-risk T1 carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 552 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, villous adenoma, or tumors with other histologic characteristics who underwent a transanal excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery n=513 or transanal excision n=39). We compared the results of CS, biopsies, and EUS with postoperative pathology findings. RESULTS: Preoperative histological diagnosis of the rectal carcinoma depended on tumor size (52% in cancers <3 cm, 25% in cancers >3 cm; p=0.001) and was correct in 56% of cases. Transanal ultrasonography (uT0/1) had superior sensitivity (95% vs 78%) and a higher positive predictive value (93% vs 85%) than clinical staging (CS I) in detecting adenoma or T1 rectal carcinoma, whereas specificity was similar in both (62% vs 58%). In patients in whom preoperative histological analysis revealed adenomas, transanal ultrasonography was accurate (uT0/1) for the postoperatively assessed adenoma pT1 in 97%, whereas diagnosis (uT0/1) was correct in only 71% of cases in which preoperative histological analyses showed rectal carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rectal tumors, preoperative staging with transanal ultrasonography and biopsy is essential for the indication and allows selection of patients for transanal local excision.     

Accuracy of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Objectives: Factors limiting the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound in staging, locally advanced primary rectal cancer after preoperative neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) were evaluated. Methods: Patients (n= 84) with initial locally advanced rectal cancer (uT3/uT4) undergoing R0 resection were investigated after preoperative treatment that combined radiotherapy up to 45 Gy with two cycles of chemotherapy (5-FU and leucovorin on d 1–5 and 22–28). At 4 to 6 weeks after completion of RCT and before tumor resection, preoperative endoluminal ultrasound was performed. Results: The accuracy to predict the depth of tumor infiltration (T-category) was found to correlate with downstaging. The T-category was correctly staged before surgery in 15 of the 51 responders (29%) and in 27 of 33 nonresponders (82%), whereas misinterpretation occurred in 36 of the responders (71%) and in 6 of the nonresponders (18%) (p < 0.001). Neither tumor distance from anal verge nor tumor location correlated with the staging accuracy. Lymph node involvement was correctly assessed in 48 patients (57%). Wall invasion was correctly ascertained in 42 patients (50%), with under estimation in 11 patients (13%) and overestimation in 31 patients (37%). Conclusions: After radiochemotherapy, endosonography does not provide a satisfactory accuracy for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. New interpretation and diagnostic criteria are needed for the prediction of treatment response. Received: 28 February 1999/Accepted: 2 April 1999     

Surgical management of large sessile villous and tubulovillous adenomas of the lower rectum

BACKGROUND: Large sessile adenomas of the rectum are premalignant lesions necessitating complete removal. METHODS: We reviewed the data on 20 consecutive patients with large (>or=2 cm) sessile villous and tubulovillous adenomas of the lower two thirds of the rectum (or=50% or an endosonographic staging of >or=uT2 underwent a low anterior resection of the rectum. The remaining 9 patients underwent a posterior full-thickness local bowel wall resection (modified Mason procedure). The median (range) follow-up period was 3.8 (0.7-8.2) years. RESULTS: Preoperative biopsy examination successfully excluded invasive carcinoma. Overstaging, however, occurred in 9 of 12 patients (75%) undergoing endosonography, resulting in surgical overtreatment of 4 patients. A curative resection (R0) was always achieved. Five patients had complications, but there was no in-hospital mortality and no cases of local recurrence. 4 out of 19 patients complained of minor stool incontinence, and 3 patients reported incomplete rectal emptying or constipation. Fourteen patients described the operative result as excellent (n = 7) or good (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: Endosonography may lead to overstaging and overtreatment. An individualized approach based on the degree of adenomatous circumferential involvement and endosonographic staging showed no mortality, low morbidity, no local recurrence, and good functional medium-term results.     

Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal lesions using two-dimensional visualization and standard endoscopic instruments: a prospective cohort study and comparison with the literature

Background  The transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) has proved to be an effective alternative to conventional surgery for the treatment of rectal lesions. The TEO procedure offers reduced morbidity, faster recovery and equivalent oncologic outcome. Currently, two instrument sets are available: one with three-dimensional (Wolf) and one with two-dimensional (Storz) optic capacities. The three-dimensional (3D) instrument set is considered the golden standard. Although the advantages of TEO are imposing, the procedure with the 3D armamentarium has certain technical and financial drawbacks. This study therefore aimed to compare results for the TEO 2D alternative with recently published results for 3D TEO. Methods  All consecutive patients with benign or malignant pT1 or pT2 rectal lesions undergoing TEO were prospectively followed. All procedures were performed with the 2D armamentarium using standard endoscopic instruments, a rectoscope (diameter, 4 cm; working length, 7.5–15 cm), and 5-mm Ligasure and Ultracision. Operating times, complications, hospital stay, and oncologic outcome were gathered and compared with published data. Results  Between 2004 and 2006, 31 patients with a median age of 75 years (range, 33–87 years) underwent 31 TEOs for a total of 36 rectal lesions (29 tubulovillous adenomas and 7 adenocarcinomas). The median distance of the lesion from the anal verge was 7.5 cm (range, 5–15 cm). The median lesion diameter was 2.3 cm (range, 0.5–5.0 cm). The locations of the lesions were as follows: 18 on the dorsal, 5 on the ventral, and 5 on the lateral rectal wall. The median operating time was 55 min (range, 25–165 min), compared with 105 min reported in the literature. All the lesions except one could be radically excised. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications occurred for three patients, all due to hemorrhage. The median hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1–21 days). During a median follow-up period of 15 months (range, 1–35 months), two recurrences took place. Conclusion  The study findings showed that for rectal tumors located up to 15 cm from the anal verge with a maximal diameter of 5 cm, TEO using standard laparoscopic instruments with a 2D view is feasible and provides results comparable with those associated with a 3D view and dedicated instruments. Furthermore, the 2D procedure can be performed with improved ergonomics due to movable monitors and is considerably less expensive.     

经肛内镜微创外科治疗早期直肠癌的价值

目的:评价经肛内镜微创外科技术(transanal endoscopic microsurgery,TEM)治疗早期直肠癌的应用效果。方法:分析评价我院2005年5月至2009年5月所治疗的84例TEM手术的临床资料。结果:本研究84例病人的肿瘤直径中位值为2.1 cm,肿瘤下缘距齿状线平均距离(8.3±2.2)cm,肿瘤侵犯直肠周径范围(33.2±17.5)%。平均手术时间(70±43)min。平均住院日期6.8 d。无一例病人发生围手术期死亡,术后部分病人有短暂性大便失禁。所有病人的肿瘤切缘皆无瘤细胞残留。术后病理证实,85例中pT060例,pT119例,pT25例。直肠癌术前腔内超声分期符合率达86.9%。平均随访26个月,2例病人出现局部复发。结论:TEM手术创伤小、保留肛门括约肌、缩短住院时间;既可作为直肠宽基腺瘤和pT1期直肠癌的根治性手术,也可作为pT2直肠癌的姑息性治疗手段。     

A critical appraisal of endorectal ultrasound and transanal endoscopic microsurgery and decision-making in early rectal cancer

Aim Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for early rectal cancer (ERC) gives results similar to major surgery in selected cases. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an important part of the preoperative selection process. This study reports its accuracy and impact for patients entered on the UK TEM database. Method The UK TEM database comprises prospectively collected data on 494 patients. This data set was used to determine the prevalence of ERUS in preoperative staging and its accuracy by comparing preoperative T‐stage with definitive pathological staging following TEM. Results ERUS was performed in 165 of 494 patients who underwent TEM for rectal cancer. It inaccurately staged rectal cancer in 44.8% of tumours: 32.7% were understaged and 12.1% were overstaged. There was no significant difference in the depth of TEM excision or R1 rate between the patients who underwent ERUS before TEM and those who did not (P = 0.73). Conclusion The data show that ERUS is employed in a minority of patients with rectal cancers undergoing TEM in the UK and its accuracy in this ‘Real World’ practice is disappointing.     

Preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. The Lyons experience, 1985-1996. Prognostic study apropos of 312 patients

AIM OF STUDY: Preoperative radiotherapy is used increasingly in rectal cancer in Europe. This study is a retrospective analysis of a series of 312 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by preoperative radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From 1985 to 1996, 312 patients were included in this study. Preoperative staging was: T2: 83, T3: 192 et T4: 21. On digital rectal examination, 25 patients were classified as N1. Endorectal sonographic staging was: uT1: 3, uT2: 77, uT3: 163, uN0: 122, uN1-2: 127. After surgery, pathological staging was: pT0: 43 (14%), pT1 24, pT2: 81, pT3: 151, pN0: 229, pN1-2: 81. Radiotherapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis with an accelerated schedule 39 Gy/13 fractions/17 days with x 18 MV. RESULTS: Median follow-up is 54 months. For pM0 patients (297 patients), the overall 5-year survival rate is 67%. Local failure rate is 9%. Since 1986, the rate of sphincter saving surgery is close to 65%. Various parameters related to the tumor were found to be significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis in relation to 5-year overall survival rate: the T stage as judged by digital rectal examination and endorectal sonography, the N stage as evaluated on digital rectal examination but not with endorectal sonography. Pathological examination of the operative specimen retains a very strong prognostic value for pT and pN. CONCLUSION: Pathological examination of the specimen of rectal carcinoma retains a very strong prognostic value after preoperative radiation therapy. Endorectal sonography is of interest to evaluate T staging of the tumor but is not reliable for N stage.     

经肛门内镜微创手术治疗直肠上皮内瘤变和早期直肠癌

目的探讨经肛门内镜微创手术（TEM）治疗直肠上皮内瘤变（IN）和早期直肠癌的临床价值。方法选择15例直肠肿瘤患者采用TEM行局部切除术。根据活检病理结合直肠腔内超声检查（EUS）术前诊断低级别IN8例，高级别IN4例，早期直肠癌3例。肿瘤距肛缘的距离4—15（平均7．2）cm，肿瘤直径1—4（平均1．8）cm，肿瘤占据肠腔周径比例10％～40％（平均20％）。结果15例直肠肿瘤均获完整切除（黏膜下切除5例，全层切除10例），各切缘均阴性。手术时间为40．90（平均57）min；术中出血量为10-60（平均35）ml。术后住院时间为2-9（平均4．5）d。术后病理确诊：直肠低级别IN5例，高级别IN6例，早期黏膜下浸润癌（pT1期）和进展期癌（pT2期）各2例。术前EUS评估肿瘤浸润肠壁深度的准确率为86．7％（13／15）。15例术后随访2．10（平均6）个月，肿瘤无局部复发。结论TEM微创、显露良好、切除精确、能获取高质量的肿瘤标本用于准确的病理分期，是治疗直肠IN和早期直肠癌的理想术式。术前EUS检查对TEM病例的选择十分重要。     

直肠癌经肛门内镜显微手术疗效及复发危险因素分析

目的 分析直肠癌经肛门内镜显微手术（TEM）疗效及复发危险因素,以探讨直肠癌TEM适应证.方法 对2006年6月至2009年6月间山东省千佛山医院胃肠外科收治的60例行TEM的直肠癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果 本组直肠癌pTis期12例,pT1期38例 pT2期10例.全部病灶均一次性全层整块切除,标本切缘均阴性.手术时间30～190（65.0±36.5）min,术中失血量9～75（10.5±5.8）ml,住院时间3～9（4.5±2.7）d,无手术死亡和严重并发症出现.随访时间12～48（平均28.5）个月,无一例死亡.pTis患者均未现复发 38例pT1期患者中1例（2.6%）出现局部复发 10例pT2期患者中有4例（40.0%）出现局部复发,显著高于pT1期患者（P＜0.05）.肿瘤直径大于3 cm的21例患者中有4例复发,显著高于肿瘤直径小于3 cm者（1/39,P＜0.05）.多因素复发危险因素分析证实,浸润深度和肿瘤大小是TEM术后复发的独立风险因素.结论 对pTis、pT1期及肿瘤小于3 cm的早期直肠癌患者,TEM安全有效,值得推广.     

The use of rectal ultrasound for the correct diagnosis and treatment of rectal villous tumors

BACKGROUND: One of the difficulties associated with surgery for rectal villous tumors (RVT) is the finding of invasive adenocarcinoma after transanal excision (TAE) and the possible need for more radical procedures or adjuvant therapy. Improved preoperative evaluation may eliminate this dilemma. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in establishing the correct diagnosis of RVT. METHODS: All patients with biopsy proven RVT, who were referred for TAE, underwent preoperative TRUS in addition to the routine evaluation. If invasion beyond the submucosa was suspected by TRUS, multiple biopsies were taken before any surgical intervention in order to exclude invasive cancer. If no invasion was noted, biopsies were avoided and a TAE was performed. The final pathology results were compared with both the preoperative diagnosis and TRUS results. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (19 female, 16 male; mean age 67.5 years, range 36 to 88) were studied. The mean distance of the distal extent of the lesion above the anal verge was 5.8 cm (1.5 to 6). In 27 patients, the tumor was limited to the submucosa (uT0, uT1) on TRUS and, therefore, TAE was performed. In 26 of 27 patients (96%), pathology examination confirmed the presence of RVT without evidence of malignancy. One patient was found to have invasion of the muscularis propria and required postoperative radiation therapy. In 8 patients (23%), TRUS showed extension beyond the submucosa; 3 of these patients had uT2 lesions, 4 had uT3 tumors, and 1 had perirectal nodes. These 8 patients underwent repeated biopsies with the finding of invasive adenocarcinoma in 7. Two patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, 3 had a low anterior resection, and 3 had a TAE. Final pathology confirmed the preoperative diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma in 7 patients. In the 1 patient with a uT2 lesion and negative biopsies, the final diagnosis was RVT with no evidence of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative TRUS provides an accurate diagnosis of RVT. In conjunction with TRUS-directed biopsies, directed management of these tumors could be achieved.     

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: experience at Korea’s National Cancer Center

Background

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive alternative to transanal excision, enabling complete local excision of selected benign or malignant rectal tumors. This study aimed to determine the surgical and oncologic results for rectal tumors excised by TEM.

Methods

From November 2001 to October 2007, 45 patients underwent TEM for excision of adenoma (13 patients), carcinoid tumor (6 patients), and carcinoma (26 patients). The patients included 27 men and 18 women with a median age of 52 years (range, 22–72 years).

Results

The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 7 cm (range, 3–15 cm), and the median tumor size was 17 mm (range, 2–60 mm). There was no procedure-related morbidity or mortality. However, one patient with rectal carcinoma died of lung cancer during the follow-up period. Of 13 patients with adenomas, 1 patient (7.7%, 1/13) experienced local recurrence 5 months after surgery. No recurrence occurred for six patients with carcinoid tumors. Histologic examination of the carcinomas showed pathologic tumor (pT) stage 0 (ypT0) in 2 patients, pT1 in 17 patients (including ypT1 in 1 patient), pT2 in 6 patients, and pT3 in 1 patient. Immediate salvage surgery was performed for five patients (19%, 5/26). During a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 5–72 months), one patient (3.8%, 1/26) experienced local recurrence. The overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates for patients with carcinoma were 96.2% and 88.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

The TEM procedure is a safe and appropriate surgical treatment option for benign rectal tumors. With strict patient selection, it is oncologically safe for early-stage rectal carcinomas.     

Résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels des résections avec anastomose coloanale directe différée dans les cancers du bas rectum préalablement irradiés

Aim of the studyThe aim of this study was to assess the oncology and functional outcome after preoperative radio-therapy and delayed coloanal anastomosis for cancers of the lower third of the rectum.Patients and methodsFrom January 1988 to December 1997, 35 patients received preoperative radiotherapy (45 Gy) followed by rectal resection through a combined abdominal and transanal approach. Thirty patients had preoperative tumor staging with endorectal ultrasonography: uT1 NO = 2, uT2N0 = 6, uT2N+ = 2, uT3N0 = 6, and uT3N+ = 14. Colorectal resection was performed on average 32 days after the conclusion of radiotherapy, and the distal colon stump was pulled through the anal canal. On post-operative day 5, the colonic stump was resected and a direct coloanal anastomosis performed.ResultsPathological examination of the specimens revealed complete tumor sterilization in two cases, pT1 N0 = 3, pT2N0 = 14, pT2N+ = 1, pT3N0 = 6, and pT3N+ = 9. There was no postoperative mortality and there was no leakage. One patient had a pelvic abscess, and another one had left colon necrosis which required re-operation. Median follow-up was 43 months (range 6–113). Two patients had locoregional recurrence, seven had distant metastasis, and 3 had both. Actuarial survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 97%, 86%, and 72% respectively. The rate of local control at 5 years was 78%. Functional results were evaluated by a new scoring system. Function was considered good in 59 and 70% at 1 and 2 years respectively.ConclusionThis new procedure is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving operation that avoids a diverting stoma. It is well adapted for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy, with low local morbidity and good functional results.     

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of selected patients with distal rectal cancer: 15 years experience

Background  Local therapy for early rectal cancer is a valid alternative to the classical radical operation, which has a higher morbidity and mortality rate. The use of high-dose preoperative radiation appears to enhance the options for sphincter-saving surgery even for T2–T3 rectal cancer patients with effective local control. The authors report their experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) used to manage selected cases of distal rectal cancer without evidence of nodal or distant metastasis (N0–M0). Methods  The study enrolled 196 patients with rectal cancer (51 T1, 84 T2, and 61 T3). All the patients staged preoperatively as T2 and T3 underwent preoperative high-dose radiotherapy, and since 1997, patients younger than 70 years in good general condition also have undergone preoperative chemotherapy. Results  Minor complications were observed in 17 patients (8.6%) and major complications in only 3 patients (1.5%). The definitive histology was 33 pT0 (17%), 73 pT1 (37%), 66 pT2 (34%), and 24 pT3 (12%). Eight patients (5 pT2 and 3 pT3) experienced local recurrence (4.1%). The rectal cancer-specific survival rate at the end of the follow-up period was 100% for pT1, 90% for pT2, and 77% for pT3 patients. Conclusions  Patients with T1 cancer and favorable histologic features may undergo local excision alone, whereas those with T2 and T3 rectal cancer require preoperative radiochemotherapy. The results in the authors’ experience after TEM appear not to be substantially different in terms of local recurrence and survival rate from those described for conventional surgery.     

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for upper rectal tumors

Background

Compared with traditional rectal resection, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is faster and safer. This retrospective study sought to assess the efficacy of TEM for lesions located in the upper rectum, ≥10 cm from the anal verge.

Methods

Data from all patients who underwent TEM for rectal lesions ≥10 cm from the anal verge between 2001 and 2010 at two medical centers in Israel were retrospectively analyzed. The study group comprised 96 patients (57 men, 39 women) who underwent 99 TEM procedures. Collected data included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, indications for surgery, operative findings and details, postoperative outcomes, and histopathologic findings. Long-term outcomes including local recurrence (LR) for benign lesions and LR and overall survival (OS) for malignant lesions were calculated. Categorical variables were calculated by frequency tables, and linear variables were represented by averages and standard deviation or median with the spread of variables. Survival and LR analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results

The mean tumor distance from the  anal verge was  11.3 ± 2 cm and the median tumor size was 2 cm. Early postoperative outcomes were favorable, and no early postoperative mortality was reported. The postoperative morbidity rate was 10 %. For long-term outcomes, in the subgroup with benign lesions, after a median follow-up of 8.7 years, the LR rate was 5.1 %. In the group with malignant lesions, LR and OS rates were 6.9 and 87 %, respectively.

Conclusions

TEM for upper rectal lesions is feasible and may be safe in selected cases. Low morbidity rate, shorter operative time and length of stay, no mortality events, and favorable long-term outcomes support the use of TEM for the treatment of lesions in the upper rectum.