Oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian carcinoma: An investigator-originated compassionate-use experience

Purpose: Compassionate-use oxaliplatin–paclitaxel was assessed for toxicity and efficacy according to clinical platinum resistance status in cisplatin–carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients.Patients and methods: Thirty-seven patients, retrospectively grouped into four oxaliplatin–paclitaxel dose levels (mg/m²): (DL1: 100/135; DL2: 130–135/135; DL3: 100/160–175; DL4: 130–135/160–175), received oxaliplatin and paclitaxel every three to four weeks.Results: Thirty-one of thirty-seven treated patients were evaluable for activity, with 1 complete and 14 partial responses, (objective response rate: 48%, 95% CI: 31–66). Of 18 platinum-resistant patients 6 responded, and of 13 platinum-sensitive patients, 9 responded. One patient (3%) had two febrile neutropenia episodes, and eight (22%) and eleven patients (30%) had grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, respectively. Six patients (16%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. The median response duration was 10.8 months, with a 23-month (range 8–54) median follow-up. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9 months (95% CI: 7–12), and 25.2 months (95% CI: 12–39), respectively.Conclusions: The antitumour activity of oxaliplatin–paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients accords with experimental data on the agents' lack of cross-resistance. Time-related progression parameters confirm it as a promising salvage treatment option.     

PS-341 and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: PS-341 is a proteasome inhibitor with preclinical activity in pancreatic cancer tumor models and synergistic activity with gemcitabine. This randomized phase II study determined the tumor response rate (RR) for PS-341 alone and the 6-month survival and RR for the combination of gemcitabine and PS-341 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either arm A: PS-341 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus (over 3--5 s) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 or arm B: PS-341 1.0 mg/m(2) (same as arm A otherwise) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8. Patients progressing on arm A were allowed to receive arm B treatment. RESULTS: Arm A: 42 evaluable patients were enrolled with a confirmed RR of 0% (95% CI 0% to 8%), median survival of 2.5 months (95% CI 2.0-3.3), and median time to progression (TTP) of 1.2 months (95% CI 1.1--1.3). Twelve of 43 evaluable patients (28%) experienced at least one grade 4+ AE. Arm B: 39 evaluable patients yielded a 6-month survival rate of 41% (16/39, 95% CI 29.8% to 67.0%), median survival of 4.8 months (95% CI 2.4--7.4), median TTP of 2.4 months (95% CI 1.5--3.1), and confirmed RR of 10% (4 partial responses/0 complete responses, 95% CI 3% to 24%). Eleven of 43 evaluable patients (26%) experienced at least one grade 4+ AE. One patient had grade 5 hypotension. CONCLUSION: The use of PS-341 alone or in combination with gemcitabine did not result in an overall survival and RR better than that expected for gemcitabine alone. Based on the lack of efficacy and the toxicity seen in our trial, there does not appear to be a role for PS-341 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with either of the schedules used in this trial.     

A Phase II study of trabectedin single agent in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum-based regimens

The objective of this study was to determine the objective response rate in patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer to treatment with trabectedin (Yondelis) administered as a 3-h infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. We carried out a multicentre Phase II trial of trabectedin in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer. Trabectedin (0.58 mg m(-2)) was administered via a central line, after premedication with dexamethasone, to 147 patients as a 3-h infusion weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest. Major eligibility criteria included measurable relapsed advanced ovarian cancer and not more than two prior platinum-containing regimens. Patients were stratified according to the treatment-free interval (TFI) between having either platinum-sensitive (>/=6 months TFI) or platinum-resistant disease (<6 months TFI)/platinum-refractory disease (progression during first line therapy). In the platinum-sensitive cohort, 62 evaluable patients with measurable disease had an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.0% (95% CI: 18.2-41.9%) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months (95% CI: 2.8-6.2). Four patients with measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria had no follow-up scans at the end of treatment. In the platinum-resistant/refractory cohort, 79 patients were evaluable with an ORR of 6.3% (95% CI: 2.1-14.2%). Median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.5 months). Two patients with measurable disease per RECIST criteria had no follow-up scans at the end of treatment. The most frequent (>/=2% of patients) drug-related treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events were reversible liver alanine transferase elevation (10%), neutropaenia (8%), nausea, vomiting, and fatigue (5% each). Trabectedin is an active treatment, with documented responses in patients with platinum sensitive advanced relapsed ovarian cancer, and has a manageable toxicity profile.     

Activity of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

This phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/ml/min on day 2 of each cycle. Fifty patients (Zubrod-ECOG-WHO performance status 0/1 in 70/30%, stage IV disease in 64%) entered the study and were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was 1 complete response and 24 partial responses among 50 evaluable patients, for a response rate of 50% (95% CI: 36.0-64.1%). The median survival time was 13 months (range: 6-22 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 54%. Hematologic toxicities included grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 24 and 8% of patients, respectively, and grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 48 and 8% of patients, respectively. These were without clinical sequelae. Seven (14%) patients had grade 3 nausea and vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is highly active and well tolerated in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

'A phase II study of oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin combined with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer'

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new combination of Uracil/Ftorafur (UFT)/leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Between February 2002 and October 2002, 64 patients received UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) from day 1 to day 14 combined with oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1, every 3 weeks. All patients were evaluable for safety analysis and 58 of 64 patients were eligible for efficacy. Responses were reviewed by an independent review committee. Of the 58 per-protocol defined assessable patients, 1 complete response and 20 partial responses were observed yielding a response rate of 34% (95% CI: 22-47). The median response duration was 8.74 months (range 1.6-14). The median time to progression and the median survival were 5.88 months (95% CI: 4.34-8.21) and 18.2 months (95% CI: 10-20.7), respectively. Diarrhoea and peripheral neuropathy were the most frequent and predictable toxicities. These events were reversible, noncumulative and manageable. Grade 3 diarrhoea occurred in only 11% of the patients. No grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity was reported in the study. The incidence of grade 3/4 (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2: NCI-CTC 2) peripheral neuropathy was 15%. Haematological toxicity was of mild to moderate intensity with 10% of the patients with Grade 3/4 neutropenia without any episode of complication. The TEGAFOX regimen, a new combination using UFT/LV and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks is feasible on an outpatient basis. The combination is safe and active and may offer a promising alternative to the intravenous route. Nevertheless this efficacy results should be confirmed by randomized phase III trials.     

Alternating irinotecan with oxaliplatin combined with UFT plus leucovorin (SCOUT) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase I study. This study expanded the maximum tolerated dose group. Patients aged >or=18 years had histologically confirmed, inoperable, previously untreated, measurable mCRC. Patients received irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 250 mg m(-2) plus LV 90 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days. The phase I/II study comprised 45 patients, 29 at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The response rate in 38 evaluable patients was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49-80). Median time to progression and overall survival were 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-10.4) and 16.8 months (95% CI: 9.6-25.3), respectively. In the MTD group, one patient had grade 3 leucopenia; one had grade 3 neutropaenia; three had grade 3 diarrhoea; and one had grade 3 neurotoxicity. No hand-foot syndrome grade >1 was seen. In total, 67% of eligible patients received second-line therapy. UFT plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an efficacious first-line treatment for mCRC, with minimal neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome.     

Phase II study of carboplatin in children with progressive low-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: To assess the rate of tumor response and activity of carboplatin in stabilizing the growth of progressive low-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients received carboplatin 560 mg/m(2) intravenously every 4 weeks for 1 year after maximum tumor response or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Between October 1993 and October 2000, 81 children (median age, 79 months; range, 6 to 204) were enrolled onto this study. Patients received a median of 11 cycles of carboplatin (range, one to 29). Median follow-up from the time of enrollment was 55 months (range, 10 to 93). The overall objective response (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + minor response [MR]) and disease stabilization (CR + PR + stable disease + MR) rates to carboplatin treatment were 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18% to 38%) and 85% (95% CI, 74% to 93%), respectively. Eleven and 14 patients suffered progressive disease on study and after stopping therapy, respectively. Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression and included grade 3/4 neutropenia in 56 patients and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 40 patients. The 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 64% (95% CI, 54% to 76%) and 84% (95% CI, 76% to 93%), respectively. Patients with diencephalic tumors had inferior FFS and OS compared with those with tumor at other sites (38% v 74% for FFS, P =.011; 54% v 91% for OS, P =.004). Neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with progressive low-grade glioma had a significantly better OS (95% v 80%; P =.052). CONCLUSION: Carboplatin, in the schedule used in this study, produced disease stabilization or improvement in a majority of children with progressive low-grade glioma, with manageable toxicity. Improved treatment strategies are particularly required for patients with diencephalic tumors.     

Multicenter non-randomized phase II study of raltitrexed (Tomudex) and oxaliplatin in non-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, phase II, open-label study evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed (Tomudex) in non-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) and raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) intravenously on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. All patients had histologically proven metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, performance status 相似文献   

A phase II study of docetaxel weekly in combination with carboplatin every three weeks as first line chemotherapy in stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian cancer: neurological toxicity and quality-of-life evaluation

The purpose of this study was to assess the response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a series of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma patients treated with a first-line weekly docetaxel and three weekly carboplatin regimens. All eligible patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel (30?mg/m2) on Days 1, 8 and 15, and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on Day 1; Q21 days for at least 6 cycles. Neurological tests, questionnaires, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and OV28 were used for quality-of-life assessments. One hundred and six patients received at least one cycle of primary chemotherapy (median 6.0; range, 1-9) and they were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Eighty-five patients had evaluable disease and received at least 3 courses of chemotherapy and were evaluable for clinical response rate. The overall response rate was 78.8% (95% CI 70.1-87.5%) and the biochemical response was 92.8% (95% CI 87.2-98.4%). The median PFS was 12.0 months and the median OS was 35.3 months. Thirty-six patients (34.0%) experienced grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, which resulted in the removal of 3 patients. Six patients (5.7%) experienced grades 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. No patients experienced grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy. Epiphora, nail changes and fatigue were frequently recorded non-hematological side effects. The tolerable hematological toxicity (no need for colony-stimulating factors) and the low rate of severe neurotoxicity (only grade 1-2) and response rates in line with the standard 3-week paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen for advanced primary ovarian carcinoma after suboptimal cytoreductive surgery make this regimen an interesting alternative in selected patients.     

Phase II study of carboplatin in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. A trial of the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin given as monotherapy in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Cisplatin is one of the most active drugs in gynaecological cancer types, but at the cost of an associated high toxicity. In this high-risk population of endometrial cancer patients, it is necessary to have chemotherapy regimens with a low toxicity. Patients eligible for this study were those with histologically-confirmed endometrial adenocarcinoma with evidence of recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Carboplatin was administered every 4 weeks as a first- (dose: 400 mg/m(2)) or second- (dose: 300 mg/m(2)) line chemotherapy. Of the 64 patients who entered the trial, 60 were eligible, 53 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 47 for efficacy. A total of 169 cycles of carboplatin was given with a median of 2 cycles per patient (range 1-11 cycles) to a median cumulative dose of 798 mg/m(2) (range 290-3879 mg/m(2)). No grade 4 toxicity or toxic deaths occurred. White Blood Cell (WBC) toxicity grade 3 was noted five times, mainly in the radiotherapy pre-treated patients. Grade 3 non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting (21%). There was a total of eight responses (3 Complete Responses (CR) and 5 Partial Responses (PR) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 13% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 6-25). No responses occurred in patients treated with prior chemotherapy. In evaluable patients, the ORR in all patients (n=47) and in those receiving first-line chemotherapy (n=33) were, 17% (95% CI 8-31) and 24% (95% CI 11-42), respectively. After a median follow-up of 379 days, the median duration of response was 488 days (range 141-5303 days) with two very long responses in patients with a CR. Carboplatin has a low toxicity and is active in chemotherapy-naive advanced endometrial carcinoma patients. These results lead us to propose its use in association in first-line chemotherapy in recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma patients. The choice of the initial dose can be determined according to whether the patients have received prior radiotherapy treatment.     

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine repeating doublet therapy in recurrent breast cancer

PurposeThe combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine, widely used in ovarian and non–small-cell lung cancers, has also been used in breast cancer. This trial examined the efficacy and toxicity of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with measurable disease, recurrent after adjuvant and ≤ 1 previous treatment for systemic disease, received carboplatin area under the curve = 2.0 (Calvert) plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m², both drugs administered days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of 15 patients accrued, 13 are fully evaluable.ResultsThere were 2 complete (13.3%) and 6 partial (40%) responses, for an overall response rate by intention to treat of 53.3% (95% CI, 28%-82%). The median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.03-6.97 months), and median overall survival was 28.8 months (95% CI, 9.4-48.2 months). There were 2 patients with grade 3 (13.3%) anemia, 7 patients with grade 3 (46.6%) and 4 patients (26.6%) with grade 4 neutropenia, 4 patients with grade 3 (26.6%) and 3 patients (20%) with grade 4 thrombocytopenia.ConclusionThe repeating doublet of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine reveals activity comparable to that of cisplatin plus gemcitabine, is well tolerated, and warrants evaluation in patients with recurrent breast cancer.     

Multicenter phase II study of a 28-day regimen of orally administered eniluracil and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Eniluracil (776C85), a potent inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows fluorouracil (5-FU) to be administered orally on a schedule that simulates continuous-infusion 5-FU. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the objective tumor response rate of orally administered eniluracil and 5-FU in the treatment of anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer were enrolled onto this open-label, phase II, multicenter study. Patients received orally administered 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil given in a 10:1 ratio (eniluracil:5-FU) twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled. Eight partial responses were observed in 84 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 17.9%), and 20 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median duration of partial response was 20.1 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 26.7 weeks). The median duration of progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients was 9.9 weeks and 40.4 weeks, respectively. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Diarrhea, nausea, malaise/fatigue, vomiting, and mucositis were the most common treatment-related nonhematologic adverse events. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were malaise/fatigue and diarrhea, occurring in 17% and 7% of patients, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was low. Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 17% of patients. CONCLUSION: Eniluracil-5-FU has modest antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-resistant breast cancer. Treatment was convenient, and patient compliance was high.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: To evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in patients with irresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Patients and methods: Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, plus cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; every four weeks.Results: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 59 years (range 42–74) were included. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 patients were assessable for response. Eleven cases had advanced recurrent locoregional disease while 13 patients had metastatic disease. One CR (4.7%) and four PR (18%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI: 8%–42%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia grade 3–4 in 28% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia grade 3–4 in 16%. The most significant non-hematological toxicity was asthenia grade 2–3 in 24% of the cycles.Conclusions: This cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination schedule has a favourable toxicity profile with a discrete activity in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Carboplatin and pemetrexed in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a realistic treatment option?

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer. Chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed can improve overall survival but has a toxic profile. Substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin may avoid some potential side-effects. Therefore, we undertook a retrospective review to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had been treated with carboplatin and pemetrexed were retrospectively identified from pharmacy databases. The endpoints were disease control rate, time to treatment failure, clinical improvement rate and overall survival. We also evaluated any significant haematological and non-haematological toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified. Of 45 evaluable cases, the disease control rate was achieved in 34 patients (69%, 95% CI 55-82, intention to treat analysis). The clinical response rate was achieved in 34 out of 49 patients (69%, 95% CI 55-82). The median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.4-5.8) and median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI 9.5-18.5). Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were observed in 7 patients (14.3%). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 12 patients (24.5%). No toxic deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed may be a viable option in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.     

Colorectal cancer metastasis resectability after treatment with the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. Final results of a phase II study

Purpose. To investigate the response rate of the triple combination of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and to assess its impact on secondary resectability of previously non-resectable liver metastasis (LM). Patients and methods. Patients≥18 with MCRC, ECOG grade 0-2, and no prior treatment received L-OHP (85 mg/m²), CPT-11 (150 mg/m²) and 5-FU (2 250 mg/m² in 48 h CI) on D1 every 15 days. Results. Forty-seven patients with initially non-resectable metastatic disease were included. Median age 62 years (38-76); 28 males; 26 patients with 0 performance status (ECOG) 40 patients had prior surgery and four adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40%), febrile neutropenia (4%), diarrhea (21%), nausea/vomiting (11%/15%), fatigue (11%), anemia and alopecia (9% each); grade 3-4 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% patients. Secondary surgery was possible in 15 of 47 (31.9%) patients and 12/30 (40%) patients with only LM: in this cohort, median OS has not been reached at 22 months median follow-up, with 2/12 patients having died. Overall response rate was 69% (95% CI, 53-82%); 13 (31%) had stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival (OS) were 10.9 (95% CI, 9.9-13.2) and 19.9 (95% CI, 11.7-TBD) months, respectively. Conclusion. This combination has shown promising activity with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCRC, and has allowed the resectability of LM in a considerable number of patients, offering them the possibility of long-term survival.     

A study of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to determine the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), using a dose of 40 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, in the treatment of platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to evaluate the toxicities. METHODS: Fourteen patients with platinum-resistant EOC were treated with intravenous PLD 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Tumor responses were assessed every 2-3 cycles by CT scan. RESULTS: All 14 patients were evaluable for toxicity, but only 13 patients were evaluable for response because 1 patient who had grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) refused to continue with the treatment. Three partial responses were observed in 13 patients. The overall response rate was 23% (95% confidence interval 10-38%). The median time to response was 2 months, and the median duration of response was 3 months. The median survival of the 13 patients was 14.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6 months. In this study, we had only 4 cases of grade 3 toxicity (2 cases of grade 3 leukopenia and 2 cases of grade 3 PPE). All toxicities that occurred were manageable. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the use of a slightly modified dose schedule for PLD at a dose of 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, which is active in platinum-refractory EOC with manageable toxicities.     

Oxaliplatin rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after prior oxaliplatin treatment

Because the number of cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited, rechallenge with the same chemotherapy agents can provide a continuum of treatment. This study investigated the efficacy and feasibility of oxaliplatin rechallenge in mCRC patients who had been previously exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were included if they had mCRC and evaluable disease, had remained disease-free or progression-free for at least 6 months after the last dose of prior oxaliplatin-based therapy, and were retreated with oxaliplatin therapy. Between January 2009 and May 2014, 110 patients were retreated with oxaliplatin-based regimens; of these, 42 (38.2%) had received prior oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy and 68 (61.8%) as palliative chemotherapy. The overall response rate to oxaliplatin rechallenge was 30.9% (34/110), and the disease control rate was 68.2% (75/110), with one patient achieving complete response, 33 achieving partial response, and 41 having stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival following oxaliplatin rechallenge were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4–7.4 months) and 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.0–23.0 months), respectively. Sixteen patients experienced grade 2 or 3 neuropathy. Ten patients experienced any grade hypersensitivity reaction within four cycles of treatment, including six who stopped treatment due to grade 3 or 4 hypersensitivity reactions. Rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy may be an option for patients who achieve at least 6 months of disease-free or progression-free survival with prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, neurotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions should be carefully monitored in this setting.     

Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as salvage treatment in pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer patients

Background

Currently, no clearly superior management strategy exists for recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. We tested the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in a multicentre phase II clinical trial.

Methods

Forty one patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were enrolled. Prior to study entry, all the participants had received at least one platinum-based regimen. Gemcitabine was administered at 1000 mg/m² as protracted infusion (100 min) on day 1, and oxaliplatin at the dose of 100 mg/m² on day 2 in a 2 hour infusion. Cycles were repeated every two weeks.

Results

We observed an overall response rate of 37% [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 22.3–51.7]. Objective responses plus disease stabilization (clinical benefit) occurred in 78% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–7.8), and median overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.2–20.8). Median time to self-reported symptom relief, which was described by 22 out of 27 symptomatic patients (81.5%), was 4 weeks (range, 2–8). Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 2 (5%) and 1 (2.5%) patients, while grade 3 anemia was encountered in 2 (5%) patients, respectively. The most common adverse effects of any grade were gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue and neutropenia. Nine patients (22%) experienced mild allergic reaction to oxaliplatin, with no treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions

In our cohort of recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients, GEMOX showed encouraging activity and manageable toxicity. Under circumstances requiring a rapid disease control, this combination regimen may offer a particularly viable option, particularly in heavily pretreated patients.     

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: A phase II clinical trial

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell urothelial carcinoma.Patients and methods: Forty-two chemonaïve patients with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 70 were treated with cisplatin 35 mg/m² followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (30 min i.v. infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 every twenty-eight days.Results: Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for efficacy. Half had visceral disease. There were seven complete (18%) and nine partial responses (24%), for a response rate of 42% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 26%–59%). Responses were independently reviewed. Median response duration was 13.5 months (95% CI: 8.5–18.1 months), median time to progressive disease 7.2 months (95% CI: 4.0–9.1 months) and median survival 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.1–18.7 months); one-year survival was 52%. Laboratory toxicities included leucopenia (44% grade 3; 17% grade 4), neutropenia (25% grade 3; 33% grade 4) and thrombocytopenia (29% grade 3; 49% grade 4). Four patients had grade 4 symptomatic toxicity (three nausea and vomiting, one diarrhoea). There were no grade 4 infections and no toxic deaths.Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is active in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The weekly schedule of cisplatin is considered inappropriate.     

A Systemic Hyperthermia Oncologic Working Group trial. Ifosfamide,carboplatin, and etoposide combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH. METHODS: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim. RESULTS: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach.