Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several randomized controlled trials have compared a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with large-volume paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Although all agree that TIPS reduces the recurrence rate of ascites, survival is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of TIPS and large-volume paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites by means of meta-analysis of individual patient data from 4 randomized controlled trials. METHODS: The study population consisted of 305 patients: 149 allocated to TIPS and 156 to paracentesis. Cumulative probabilities of transplant-free survival and of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences assessed by log-rank test. The total number of HE episodes per patient was also compared between TIPS and paracentesis. RESULTS: Tense ascites recurred in 42% of patients allocated to TIPS and 89% allocated to paracentesis (P < .0001). Sixty-five patients in the TIPS group and 78 in the paracentesis group died. The actuarial probability of transplant-free survival was significantly better in the TIPS group (P = .035). Cox regression analysis performed in a subgroup of 235 patients (114 allocated to TIPS and 121 to paracentesis) showed that age, serum bilirubin level, plasma sodium level, and treatment allocation were independently associated with transplant-free survival. The average number of HE episodes was significantly higher in the TIPS group (1.13 +/- 1.93 vs 0.63 +/- 1.18; P = .006), although the cumulative probability of developing the first episode of HE was similar between the groups (P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis of individual patient data provides further evidence to the previous meta-analyses of literature data showing that TIPS significantly improves transplant-free survival of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.     

Long-term efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the treatment of refractory ascites]

Eighteen patients with refractory ascites (Child-Pugh score 9.9) defined by our criteria were treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The long-term efficacy of the treatment was studied in these patients. The complete and partial response rate of refractory ascites was 73% at 6 months, 90% at 1 year and 100% at 2 years. The cumulative survival rate was 89% at 6 months, 78% at 1 year and 48% at 2 years. A statistically significant(p < 0.05) increase was observed in performance status score following TIPS: Mean performance status score prior to TIPS was 43%, as opposed to 62% at 3 months after TIPS and 85% at 2 years. Child-Pugh score and liver function tests showed no significant change. During follow-up, shunt stenosis was noted in 14 patients, requiring shunt revision. Ascites recurrence was observed in 70% of patients with shunt stenosis and shunt revision resulted in good control of ascites. Post-TIPS encephalopathy was seen in 15 patients during follow-up. In conclusion, TIPS is effective on the treatment of refractory ascites and results in an improvement in quality of life. TIPS also may improve survival of the patients with refractory ascites. However, shunt stenosis and encephalopathy are common and require careful follow-up and adequate treatment.     

Uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several trials showed that uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is superior to paracentesis for the control of refractory ascites. However, the results for encephalopathy and mortality were not consistent across trials. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of TIPS for refractory ascites to assess the overall treatment effects and to explore potential reasons of heterogeneity. METHODS: Pertinent studies were retrieved trough MEDLINE (1968-2004), EMBASE (1986-2004), the Cochrane Library (2004;4), and reference lists of key articles. Outcome measures were recurrence of ascites, encephalopathy, and mortality. Metaregression analysis was used to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Five trials were identified including 330 patients. Successful TIPS placement ranged from 77% to 100% and portosystemic pressure gradient reduction ranged from 6.0 to 14.0 mm Hg. Metaregression analysis showed that bilirubin levels and successful TIPS placement rates were associated significantly with log-odds ratio for death after TIPS, explained heterogeneity of trials for mortality, and suggested an outlier trial. After exclusion of the outlier trial, pooled odds ratios for recurrence of ascites with TIPS was .14 (confidence interval, .07-.27), for encephalopathy was 2.26 (confidence interval, 1.35-3.76), and for mortality was .74 (confidence interval, .40-1.37), without any significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Uncovered TIPS is significantly better than paracentesis for control of refractory ascites. Although it increases encephalopathy, it also is associated with a trend toward improvement of survival. Future TIPS trials should select patients on the basis of bilirubin levels and predictors of the risk for post-TIPS encephalopathy, and assess costs and quality of life.     

Surgical repair of umbilical hernias in cirrhosis with ascites

The most common complications of umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis and ascites include leakage, ulceration, rupture and incarceration. If such a complication is present, there is a high mortality rate after surgical repair. Elective repair is the most effective choice, as it prevents complications with a lower mortality. However, the control of ascites before and/or after repair is mandatory but may not always be possible with diuretics and paracentesis. Portal decompression by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with better control of ascites may allow these patients to undergo surgery. Patients with cirrhosis and umbilical hernias should be referred for consideration of an elective surgical repair with mesh, preferably after optimal management of ascites. There should be a low threshold for placement of a TIPS to facilitate surgery and reduce the chance of severe recurrence of ascites. If surgery is contraindicated, a TIPS must be considered for control of ascites.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and portal hypertension-related complications

Portal hypertension(PH)plays an important role in the natural history of cirrhosis,and is associated with several clinical consequences.The introduction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts(TIPS)in the 1980s has been regarded as a major technical advance in the management of the PH-related complications.At present,polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents are the preferred option over traditional bare metal stents.TIPS is currently indicated as a salvage therapy in patients with bleeding esophageal varices who fail standard treatment.Recently,applying TIPS early(within 72 h after admission)has been shown to be an effective and life-saving treatment in those with high-risk variceal bleeding.In addition,TIPS is recommended as the second-line treatment for secondary prophylaxis.For bleeding gastric varices,applying TIPS was able to achieve hemostasis in more than 90%of patients.More trials are needed to clarify the efficacy of TIPS compared with other treatment modalities,including cyanoacrylate injection and balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices.TIPS should also be considered in bleeding ectopic varices and refractory portal hypertensive gastropathy.In patients with refractory ascites,there is growing evidence that TIPS not only results in better control of ascites,but also improves long-term survivalin appropriately selected candidates.In addition,TIPS is a promising treatment for refractory hepatic hydrothorax.However,the role of TIPS in the treatment of hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndrome is not well defined.The advantage of TIPS is offset by a risk of developing hepatic encephalopathy,the most relevant postprocedural complication.Emerging data are addressing the determination the optimal time and patient selection for TIPS placement aiming at improving long-term treatment outcome.This review is aimed at summarizing the published data regarding the application of TIPS in the management of complications related to PH.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the treatment of refractory ascites

Background: The Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) corrects portal hypertension and has proven to be effective in controlling variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Several reports have now appeared suggesting a possible role in patients with refractory ascites.
Aims: To examine the outcome of TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis.
Methods: Fifteen patients underwent TIPS for ascites between April 1992 and December 1996. The clinical findings, response to treatment, complications, shunt patency and survival of these patients were analysed.
Results: TIPS was successfully placed in all patients. The mean period of follow-up was 375 days (range: 14–1165 days). In eight patients (53%) there was a reduction in the degree of ascites after shunt insertion, with six patients (40%) having complete resolution. Age, Child-Pugh class or portal pressure gradient, before or after the procedure, were not predictive of response. Of five patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >130 umol/L), only one had improvement in ascites control. Six patients (40%) required shunt revision during follow-up, either for acute thrombotic occlusion (two) or stent stenosis (four). New or worsening encephalopathy developed in ten patients (67%). Two patients (13%) died of liver failure within 30 days. Cumulative survival was 46% at one year and 18% at two years. Treatment response was associated with increased survival (ρ=0.02), with median survival of 658 days as compared with 71 days for treatment failure.
Conclusions: TIPS can be effective in the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Our experience suggests the benefit may be less for patients with advanced liver disease and renal impairment. Controlled trials are needed to compare TIPS with other treatment modalities such as large volume paracentesis or peritoneovenous shunting.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 16 years ago, more than 1,000 publications have appeared demonstrating broad acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes our present knowledge about technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients and indications. A technical success rate near 100% and a low occurrence of complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function, hepatic encephalopathy and the possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex sonography and can avoid routine radiological revision. Short-term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. Stent grafts covered with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene show promising long-term patency comparable with that of surgical shunts. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. The thirteen randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable in patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment for acute or recurrent variceal bleeding. Another group comprises patients with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications. Five randomized studies comparing TIPS with paracentesis and one study comparing TIPS with the peritoneo-venous shunt showed good response of ascites but controversial results on survival. In addition, TIPS has been successfully applied to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic variceal bleeding.     

The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional radiology technique that has shown a 90% success rate to decompress the portal circulation. As a non-surgical intervention, without requirement for anesthesia and very low procedure-related mortality, TIPS is applicable to severe cirrhotic patients, who are otherwise untreatable, for example, nonsurgical candidates. TIPS constitutes the most frequently employed tool to achieve portosystemic shunting. TIPS acts by lowering portal pressure, which is the main underlying pathophysiologic determinant of the major complications of cirrhosis. Regarding esophagogastric variceal bleeding, TIPS has excellent hemostatic effect (95%) with low rebleeding rate (<20%). TIPS is an accepted rescue therapy for first line treatment failures in 2 settings (1) acute variceal bleeding and (2) secondary prophylaxis. In addition, TIPS offers 70% to 90% hemostasis to patients presenting with recurrent active variceal bleeding. TIPS is more effective than standard therapy for patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient >20mm Hg. TIPS is particularly useful to treat bleeding from varices inaccessible to endoscopy. TIPS should not be applied for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Portosystemic encephalopathy and stent dysfunction are TIPS major drawbacks. The weakness of the TIPS procedure is the frequent need for endovascular reintervention to ensure stent patency. The circulatory effects of TIPS are an attractive approach for the treatment of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome, yet TIPS is not considered first line therapy for refractory ascites owing to unacceptable incidence of portosystemic encephalopathy. Pre-TIPS evaluation taking into account predictors of outcome is mandatory. The improved results achieved with covered-stents might expand the currently accepted recommendations for TIPS use.     

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术对酒精性肝硬化导致门静脉高压的治疗效果与安全性分析

目的分析经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗酒精性肝硬化导致门静脉高压的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性总结2006年6月至2011年6月本院30例接受TIPS治疗的酒精性肝硬化导致门静脉高压的患者资料,记录术前及术后门静脉压力、腹水、脾功能亢进、肝功能等指标。随访终点为术后2 a,观察术后并发症包括消化道再出血、支架堵塞、腹水及肝性脑病发生情况,并分析肝性脑病发生与患者临床参数的关系。穿刺前、后门静脉压力差别采用配对t检验分析;Kaplan-Meier方法用于术后临床参数与肝性脑病发生相关性分析。结果 TIPS手术成功率为100%(30/30),门静脉压力术前(37.27±2.52)cm H2O降为术后(24.6±2.58)cm H2O,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后2 a内,消化道再出血率为3.3%(1/30);腹水治疗有效率达88.9%(16/18);支架狭窄发生率为6.7%(2/30);肝性脑病发生率为40%(12/30)。Kaplan-Meier分析发现患者术前Child-Pugh分级与术后肝性脑病发生密切相关(P=0.04)。结论 TIPS是治疗酒精性肝硬化门静脉高压相关并发症安全有效的微创方法,术前ChildPugh分级是影响患者肝性脑病发生的重要因素。     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for refractory ascites: Assessment of clinical and hormonal response and renal function

Cirrhosis is frequently complicated by ascites that may become resistant to diuretic therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) represent a new treatment for this debilitating condition. The aim of this study was to ascertain the clinical efficacy of TIPS, as well as its impact on renal function and on hormonal parameters. Five inpatients with refractory ascites were studied prospectively before TIPS, and 3 and 14 days after TIPS. After TIPS, ascites completely resolved or was minimal in all patients. Diuretics were discontinued in three subjects and decreased by at least 50% in two. One patient developed liver failure after TIPS and required liver transplantation; the others remained stable after a mean follow-up of 14 months. Mean urinary sodium excretion increased from 2.1 ± 0.6 mEq/ 24 hr before TIPS to 13.0 ± 4.3 mEq/24 hr 14 days after TIPS. Mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate also tended to improve during the study period. With the exception of the patient who developed liver failure, plasma aldosterone concentration decreased from a mean of 126.0 ± 29.9 ng/dL to 22.8 ± 6.8 ng/dL (P = .04), and plasma renin activity decreased from a mean of 9.0 ± 3.0 μg/L/h to 0.9 ± 0.1 μg/L/h (P = .08). Additionally, 19 patients who underwent TIPS for refractory ascites outside of this protocol were followed prospectively for a mean of 282 days. Clinical improvement in ascites control was noted in 74%, and the mean dose of diuretics was decreased by more than 50%. Nonresponders more often had underlying renal disease. In conclusion, TIPS is an effective therapy for refractory ascites in most patients. TIPS improves renal function and in most patients reverses underlying hormonal derangements. TIPS may have an adverse effect on hepatic function, necessitating careful patient selection.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for cirrhosis and ascites: Effects in patients with organic or functional renal failure

BACKGROUND: A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is increasingly being used for treatment of patients with refractory ascites and functional renal failure. In contrast, organic renal disease is commonly considered a relative contraindication for TIPS placement. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of TIPS in patients with refractory ascites and organic or functional renal impairment. METHODS: A TIPS was placed for refractory or intractable ascites in 10 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/100 ml). Four of them had organic kidney disorders. Of these patients, three had moderate renal impairment, and one had end-stage renal disease and needed hemodialysis every other day. The other six patients had functional renal impairment due to the underlying liver disease. RESULTS: TIPS was effective in reducing ascites in 8 of 10 patients, including all patients with organic renal disease. Furthermore, after TIPS the renal function improved in all patients. Serum creatinine and serum urea levels decreased significantly from 1.8 +/- 0.1 to 1.5 +/- 0.1 mg/100 ml (P < 0.05) and from 107 +/- 13 to 78 +/- 14 mg/100 ml (P < 0.05), respectively. The renal function of the three patients with organic renal failure improved similarly, as observed in the six patients with functional renal failure. In the patient on hemodialysis, TIPS was effective in reducing the frequency of paracenteses. CONCLUSION: TIPS may be useful in patients with functional and in patients with organic renal disease, resulting in improvement of ascites and renal function.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: current status

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was developed in the 1980s for treatment of complications of portal hypertension. Once it was shown that the shunt could be placed with relative ease, TIPS was rapidly applied to the treatment of many of the complications of portal hypertension. These complications include actively bleeding gastroesophageal varices, prevention of rebleeding from varices, control of refractory cirrhotic ascites and hepatic hydrothorax, and treatment of hepatorenal failure and hepatopulmonary syndrome. TIPS has also been used as therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome and veno-occlusive disease. Despite these broad applications, TIPS has been compared with other forms of therapy in only 2 situations: prevention of rebleeding from varices and control of refractory cirrhotic ascites. In the trials, TIPS was shown to provide better control of these 2 complications of portal hypertension than standard forms of therapy. However, there was no improvement in survival and the incidence of encephalopathy was greater for patients receiving a TIPS. Thus, the use of TIPS for the control of ascites and prevention of rebleeding from varices should be limited to a select group of patients. There have been no controlled trials for the other indications listed. Despite the apparent efficacy of TIPS in many of these situations, its use should be limited to salvage therapy pending the publication of controlled trials showing it is a better treatment than other forms of therapy.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of complications of portal hypertension

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a commonly used approach for managing many complications of portal hypertension. It is an attractive option due to its relative ease of creation (> 90% success rate) and the availability at most hospitals of an interventional radiologist capable of performing the procedure. TIPS is the preferred approach to control acutely bleeding esophageal or gastric varices that cannot be controlled with medical management. It is also now preferred to surgical shunts for preventing rebleeding in patients who rebleed despite adequate medical management. TIPS is more effective than large-volume paracentesis in controlling refractory cirrhotic ascites, with possibly a slight survival benefit but also increased encephalopathy. TIPS should be used to control refractory ascites in patients who cannot be managed with large-volume paracentesis. The role of TIPS in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome is unclear; currently only patients with type 2 hepatorenal syndrome should be considered candidates for TIPS.     

Treatment of cirrhotic ascites

Cirrhosis is the most common cause of ascites and accounts for almost 85% of all cases. It is the most common complication of cirrhosis, after development of ascites only 50% of patients will survive for 2 to 5 years. Successful treatment is dependent on accurate diagnosis of the cause of ascites. Because sodium and water retention is the basic abnormality leading to ascites formation, restriction of sodium intake and enhancing sodium excretion is the mainstay of the treatment of ascites. Patients with cirrhosis and ascites must limit sodium intake to 2 gram per day. Enhancement of sodium excretion can be accomplished by usage of oral diuretics. The recommended initial dose is spironolactone 100-200 mg/d and furosemide 20-40 mg/d. usual maximum doses are 400 mg/d of spironolactone and 160 mg/d of furosemide. The recommended weight loss in patients without peripheral edema is 300 to 500 g/d. There is no limit to the daily weight loss of patients who have edema. About 90% of patients respond well to medical therapy for ascites. Refractory ascites is defined as fluid overload that is unresponsive to sodium restricted diet and high dose diuretic treatment (diuretic resistant) or when there is an inability to reach maximal dose of diuretics because of adverse effects (diuretic-intractable). It has a poor prognosis. Treatment options for patients with refractory ascites are serial therapeutic paracentesis, transjugular intrahepatic stent-shunt (TIPS) or peritoneovenous shunt and liver transplantation. TIPS should be considered in patients who repeatedly fail large-volume paracentesis and have relatively preserved liver functions. Liver transplantation is the only modality that is associated with improved survival.     

肝硬化腹水治疗的研究现状与展望

腹水是肝硬化最常见的并发症,并与发生感染、稀释性低钠血症、肾功能衰竭和病死率增加密切相关。无并发症的少量腹水患者早期处理原则是,休息加上低钠饮食。中等量腹水患者,一般选择低剂量利尿剂就能达到利尿效果。大量腹水患者,可大量放腹水＋静点白蛋白（8g/每放腹水1000ml）。顽固性腹水患者,可用重复多次大量放腹水＋血浆扩容治疗或用经颈静脉肝内门体分流术（TIPS）治疗。新药（如V2受拮抗剂和血管收缩剂等）对肝硬化腹水的治疗可能带来希望。     

A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) may worsen liver function and decrease survival in some patients. The Child-Pugh classification has several drawbacks when used to determine survival in such patients. The survival of 231 patients at 4 medical centers within the United States who underwent elective TIPS was studied to develop statistical models to (1) predict patient survival and (2) identify those patients whose liver-related mortality post-TIPS would be 3 months or less. Among these elective TIPS patients, 173 had the procedure for prevention of variceal rebleeding and 58 for treatment of refractory ascites. Death related to liver disease occurred in 110 patients, 70 within 3 months. Cox proportional-hazards regression identified serum concentrations of bilirubin and creatinine, international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR), and the cause of the underlying liver disease as predictors of survival in patients undergoing elective TIPS, either for prevention of variceal rebleeding or for treatment of refractory ascites. These variables can be used to calculate a risk score (R) for patients undergoing elective TIPS. Patients with R > 1.8 had a median survival of 3 months or less. This model was superior to both the Child-Pugh classification, as well as the Child-Pugh score, in predicting survival. Using logistic regression and the same variables, we also developed a nomogram that indicates which patients survive less than 3 months. Finally, the model was validated among an independent set of 71 patients from the Netherlands. This Mayo TIPS model may predict early death following elective TIPS for either prevention of variceal rebleeding or for treatment of refractory ascites.     

The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art

ABSTRACT— The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an interventional treatment resulting in decompression of the portal system by creation of a side-to-side portosystemic anastomosis. Since its introduction 10 years ago, more than 500 publications have appeared demonstrating rapid acceptance and increasing clinical use. This review summarizes the present knowledge of technical aspects and complications, follow-up of patients, and indications. With respect to the technique, the TIPS procedure is probably one of the most difficult interventions and, therefore, technical success and complications clearly depend on the skills of the operator. Thus, the number and kind of complications reported in this review do not necessarily relate to the procedural complications of an experienced center. The follow-up of the TIPS patient has to assess shunt patency, liver function and hepatic encephalopathy. Shunt patency can best be monitored by duplex-sonography. Routine radiological revision seems not to be helpful and does not improve results, i.e., rebleeding and survival. Short term patency may be improved by anticoagulation, while such a treatment does not influence long-term patency. With respect to the indications of TIPS, much is known about treatment of variceal bleeding. The nine randomized studies that are available to date show that survival is comparable between patients receiving TIPS or endoscopic treatment. The second group of patients is the group with refractory ascites and related complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax. It has been demonstrated that TIPS improves these complications, but randomized studies are still lacking. In addition, TIPS has been applied successfully to patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, before liver transplantation, and for the treatment of ectopic portal hypertensive bleeding.     

Aszites und hepatorenales Syndrom

Massive ascites and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are frequent complications of liver cirrhosis. Thus, effective therapy is of great clinical importance. This review provides an up-to-date account of the current status and details recent advances. Therapeutic paracentesis can be safely performed even in patients with severe coagulopathy. Selected patients with refractory or recurrent ascites are good candidates for portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and may have a survival benefit and improved quality of life from these. Novel pharmaceutical agents mobilizing free water (aquaretics) are currently being tested for their therapeutic potential in patients with ascites. TIPS are seldom considered for the treatment of HRS, for which pharmacological approaches (terlipressin and albumin) have proved their worth. Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment option for refractory ascites and HRS and should be discussed as soon as ascites is diagnosed.     

TIPS is a useful long-term derivative therapy for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome uncontrolled by medical therapy.

Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) may require treatment with portal decompressive surgery or liver transplantation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) represents a new treatment alternative, but its long-term effect on BCS outcome has not been evaluated. Twenty-one patients with BCS consecutively admitted to our unit were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 4 +/- 3 years. Seven patients had nonprogressive forms and were successfully controlled with medical therapy; 1 case, with a short-length hepatic vein stenosis was successfully treated by angioplasty. All 8 patients are alive and asymptomatic. The remaining 13 patients, had a TIPS because of clinical deterioration (in one of them, because early TIPS thrombosis a successful side-to-side portacaval shunt [SSPCS] was performed) followed by an improvement in clinical condition. However, a patient with fulminant liver failure before TIPS insertion, died 4 months later and another patient with cirrhosis at diagnosis had liver transplantation 2 years later. The remaining 11 patients are alive and free of ascites. In 3 of these patients TIPS is patent after 3, 6, and 12 months. The remaining 8 patients developed late TIPS dysfunction. In two of these cases, after angioplasty and restenting, TIPS is patent after a follow-up of 9 and 80 months. In 5 other patients, recurring TIPS occlusion was not further corrected because no signs of portal hypertension were present. In conclusion, in patients with BCS uncontrolled with medical therapy, TIPS is a highly effective technique that is associated with long-term survival.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: an analysis of the literature on efficacy, morbidity, and mortality

OBJECTIVES: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is frequently used to treat patients with refractory ascites, but its role is controversial. We sought to determine from the literature the efficacy, morbidity, and mortality associated with TIPS for refractory ascites. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and identified studies published in English from January, 1985, to March, 2003, that evaluated the effect of TIPS in patients with refractory ascites. Outcomes that were analyzed included complete resolution of ascites, reduction in ascites, mortality, encephalopathy, stenosis, and renal function. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. RESULTS: Of 25 studies identified, 16 were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate for complete response at 6 months was 45% and for any response (complete and partial) was 63%. Pooled 6-month mortality after TIPS was 36%. Risk factors for mortality included renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl), hyperbilirubinemia (total bilirubin >3 mg/dl), advanced age (>60 yr), and poor response to TIPS. The pooled rate of new or worsening encephalopathy after TIPS was 32%. In most cases, encephalopathy was managed medically or by reduction in shunt size; however, refractory cases were associated with 100% mortality in most studies. Studies reporting the effect of TIPS on kidney function showed improvement in creatinine clearance and urinary sodium excretion. CONCLUSIONS: TIPS is effective in eliminating ascites or substantially reducing ascites in cases refractory to medical therapy. Renal insufficiency, refractory encephalopathy, and hyperbilirubinemia were consistently associated with mortality after TIPS. In individuals with risk factors for mortality, alternative strategies should be recommended.