Warfarin-induced skin necrosis and venous limb gangrene in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common, often catastrophic, syndrome that produces the most hypercoagulable of states. Emerging therapeutic strategies use alternative anticoagulants; warfarin's place is being reexamined. Early in the course of warfarin therapy, there may be net procoagulant effects because of the inhibition of protein C. With HIT, it has been suggested that unopposed warfarin can precipitate venous limb gangrene. There are also reports of warfarin-induced skin necrosis. We seek to confirm and increase awareness of the risks of warfarin with HIT. METHODS: We describe 6 patients with HIT seen at 3 medical centers in whom frank or impending venous limb gangrene, central skin necrosis, or both were temporally related to warfarin initiation. RESULTS: At warfarin initiation, 5 patients had recognized HIT and 1 had it recognized later. Complications emerged after 2 to 7 days, and consisted of warfarin-induced skin necrosis (n = 5) and venous limb gangrene (n = 2); 1 patient had both. This emerged with unopposed warfarin in 4 patients and as a direct thrombin inhibitor was being withdrawn in 2. All had supratherapeutic international normalized ratios. One patient required leg and breast amputations, and another one died. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the early effects on protein C, warfarin can precipitate venous limb gangrene and/or skin necrosis in the extreme hypercoagulable milieu of HIT. With HIT, unopposed warfarin should be avoided and caution is needed during transition from a direct thrombin inhibitor. Warfarin should be initiated at modest doses in patients with HIT after platelet recovery. Implications extend to warfarin initiation with other thrombotic diatheses.     

HITlights: a career perspective on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Two decades of research into heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) permit a personal historical perspective on this fascinating syndrome. Previously, the frequency of HIT was unknown, although complicating thrombosis was believed to be rare and primarily arterial. The opportunity to apply a remarkable test for "HIT antibodies"--the (14) C-serotonin-release assay (SRA)--to serial plasma samples obtained during a clinical trial of heparin thromboprophylaxis, provided insights into the peculiar nature of HIT, such as, its prothrombotic nature--including its strong association with venous thrombosis (RR = 11.6 [95%CI, 6.4-20.8; P < 0.0001); its more frequent occurrence with unfractionated versus low-molecular-weight heparin; the "iceberg" model, which states that among the many patients who form anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during heparin therapy, only a minority whose antibodies evince strong platelet-activating properties develop HIT; and the characteristic HIT timeline, whereby serum/plasma antibodies are readily detectable at or prior to the HIT-associated platelet count fall. Applying the SRA also to patients encountered in clinical practice led to recognition of warfarin-induced venous limb gangrene (for which HIT is a major risk factor via its extreme hypercoagulability) and delayed-onset HIT (whereby thrombocytopenia begins or worsens following heparin discontinuation, due to the ability of HIT antibodies strongly to activate platelets even in the absence of heparin--so-called heparin-"independent" platelet activation). Recent concepts include the increasing recognition of HIT "overdiagnosis" (due to the low diagnostic specificity of the widely-applied PF4-dependent immunoassays), and the observation that HIT-associated consumptive coagulopathy is a risk factor for treatment failure with PTT-adjusted direct thrombin inhibitor therapy ("PTT confounding" secondary to HIT-associated coagulopathy).     

Current agents for the treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Several counterintuitive treatment paradoxes complicate the management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). For example, simple discontinuation of heparin often fails to prevent subsequent HIT-associated thrombosis. Thus, current treatment guidelines recommend substituting heparin with a rapidly acting alternative anticoagulant (eg, danaparoid, lepirudin, or argatroban) even when HIT is suspected on the basis of thrombocytopenia alone ("isolated HIT"). Another paradox-coumarin (warfarin) anticoagulation-can lead to venous limb gangrene in a patient with HIT-associated deep-vein thrombosis. Thus, warfarin is not recommended during acute thrombocytopenia secondary to HIT. However, warfarin can be given as overlapping therapy with an alternative anticoagulant, provided that (1) initiation of warfarin is delayed until substantial platelet count recovery has occurred (to at least above 100 x 10(9)/L); (2) low initial doses of warfarin are used; (3) at least 5 days of overlapping therapy are given; and (4) the alternative agent is maintained until the platelet count has normalized. It has recently been recognized that HIT antibodies are transient and usually do not recur upon subsequent re-exposure to heparin. This leads to a further paradox-patients with previous HIT can be considered for a brief re-exposure to heparin under exceptional circumstances; for example, heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, if HIT antibodies are no longer detectable using sensitive assays. For patients with acute or recent HIT who require urgent heart surgery, other approaches include use of alternative anticoagulants (eg, lepirudin or danaparoid) for cardiopulmonary bypass or antiplatelet agents (eg, tirofiban or epoprostenol) to permit intraoperative use of heparin.     

Warfarin-induced skin necrosis in 2 patients with protein S deficiency: successful reinstatement of warfarin therapy.

Warfarin-induced skin necrosis is a rare but serious complication of oral anticoagulant therapy. This condition has been associated with protein C deficiency but only rarely reported in patients with a deficiency of protein S. We have managed 2 patients with a history of warfarin-induced skin necrosis who were diagnosed as being protein-S-deficient. Since both patients were candidates for long-term anticoagulant therapy we elected to reintroduce warfarin using a regimen designed to minimize the risk of recurrent skin necrosis. While they were therapeutically anticoagulated with heparin, warfarin was started at 1 mg/day and the dose was increased gradually. Heparin was not discontinued until the prothrombin times were in the therapeutic range for at least 72 h. Both patients tolerated the reinstitution of warfarin without difficulty and they have now been followed for over 2 years on oral anticoagulants without complication.     

Multicentric warfarin-induced skin necrosis complicating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Two patients developed catastrophic multicentric skin necrosis while receiving warfarin to treat venous thromboembolism complicated by immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Patient 1 developed skin necrosis involving the breasts, thighs, and face, as well as venous limb gangrene and bilateral hemorrhagic necrosis of the adrenal glands, resulting in death. The second patient developed bilateral mammary necrosis necessitating mastectomies, as well as skin necrosis involving the thigh. Neither patient had an identifiable hypercoagulable syndrome, other than HIT. HIT may represent a risk factor for the development of multicentric warfarin-induced skin necrosis (WISN).     

Venous thromboembolism in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are among the most common complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an antibody-mediated adverse effect of heparin that leads paradoxically to in vivo activation of platelets and the coagulation system. Inappropriate treatment of HIT-associated DVT with warfarin can cause the DVT to progress to limb gangrene: this results from impaired ability of the protein C natural anticoagulant pathway to down-regulate thrombin generation, thus leading to microvascular thrombosis and tissue necrosis. Appreciation of the importance of coagulation system activation in HIT provides a rationale for treatments that reduce thrombin generation, either via inhibiting factor Xa (danaparoid) or via inhibiting thrombin directly (lepirudin). Clinicians should know how to distinguish HIT from other thrombocytopenic disorders: for example, thrombocytopenia associated with pulmonary embolism can mimic HIT (pseudo-HIT), and acute dyspnea that can mimic acute pulmonary embolism can result from acute in vivo platelet activation in a patient with HIT antibodies who receives heparin bolus therapy (pseudo-pulmonary embolism).     

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia in myeloproliferative disorders: A rare or under‐diagnosed complication?

Patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) are prone to develop thrombotic complications and thus frequently receive heparin. Surprisingly heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has been rarely reported in MPD and is potentially under-diagnosed due to the relatively high platelet count. We report three patients with MPD who developed HIT; all presented with a relative fall of platelet counts (although without an absolute thrombocytopenia), thrombosis or skin necrosis and a positive test for HIT antibodies (particle gel immunoassay). Risk factors for developing HIT in our patients were exposure to unfractionated heparin, a recent surgical procedure and female gender. We review the literature on HIT in MPD and discuss the diagnosis of HIT in the absence of an absolute thrombocytopenia.     

A case of pulmonary embolism due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after the placement of hepatic arterial infusion catheter

A 68-year-old woman developed acute pulmonary embolism after hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Because the platelet count was significantly reduced, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) due to heparin usage in hepatic arterial infusion therapy was clinically suspected. Subsequently, the patient tested positively for HIT antibodies, and a definitive diagnosis was obtained. Antithrombotic therapy with heparin was discontinued and treatment with argatroban was started. After the heparinized hydrophilic catheter was removed, the platelet count improved immediately. HIT should be considered when a decrease in platelet count and thrombosis are involved with the usage of heparin.     

ET gets HIT--thrombocytotic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a patient with essential thrombocythemia (ET).

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively common complication in patients receiving heparin, and represents a strong risk factor for thromboembolic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. The condition is commonly defined as a platelet count fall of greater than 30-50% to values below 150 x 10(9)/l. Despite this, several cases with platelet count nadirs in the normal range have been reported. This report describes a patient with status post-carotid thrombendarterectomy presenting with neurological symptoms and thrombocytosis (1235 x 10(9)/l), which in due course was diagnosed to be caused by essential thrombocythemia (ET). Heparin therapy was established and symptoms resolved markedly. After 5 days of standard heparin therapy, serologically confirmed HIT with new neurological symptoms occurred. The platelet count nadir attributed to HIT was far above normal (633 x 10(9)/l), which nevertheless represented a substantial relative platelet count fall (49%). This is the first reported case of serologically confirmed HIT in a patient with ET. Furthermore, it represents the first published case of HIT being present in thrombocytosis. Clinicians should be aware that atypical HIT can even be present in thrombocytosis and, because of nomenclature, HIT with normal and elevated platelet count nadirs is likely to be largely underdiagnosed.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis. Case report and review of the literature

Thrombocytopenia is a potential complication of heparin therapy. There are two forms of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Type-I HIT is characterized by a mild decrease in platelet count that occurs within the first 2-4 days after heparin initiation. The platelet count often returns to normal without stop heparin treatment. The mechanism of thrombocytopenia appears to be due to a direct effect of heparin on platelet activation. The second form (type-II) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by severe thrombocytopenia, which may include both arterial and venous thrombosis. We present a case of type-II HIT occurred in a hemodialysis patient resulting in acute pulmonary embolism and peripheral venous thrombosis, and review the literature.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a review

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relevant adverse drug reaction consisting in a hypercoagulable state caused by an anticoagulant agent. The incidence is approximately 6.5% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin after orthopedic surgery, and is equal to or lower than 1% in other settings. HIT occurrence is a function of heparin type, duration of heparin administration, patient population, and gender. The pathogenesis is due to an antibody response to the complex heparin/platelet factor 4 in most cases, with secondary activation of platelets and coagulation, and finally increased thrombin generation. Thrombocytopenia, venous or arterial thrombosis, heparin-induced skin necrosis, adrenal hemorrhage, and transient amnesia can characterize the clinical course of HIT. Platelet monitoring in patients receiving heparin is indicated to early detect HIT. A thrombotic event can be the first manifestation of HIT. Laboratory demonstration of heparin-dependent platelet activation confirms the clinical diagnosis; antigenic or functional assays are available. Once HIT is highly likely or confirmed serologically, immediate heparin cessation is mandatory and an alternative therapeutic anticoagulant is needed due to the high risk (or the presence) of thrombotic events. The available nonheparin anticoagulants aim to reduce thrombin generation. Lepirudin, argatroban, and bivalirudin (direct thrombin inhibitors) and danaparoid and fondaparinux (factor Xa inhibitors) represent the current treatment options for HIT. Vitamin K antagonists can be used safely only after a stable platelet count has been obtained.     

The management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology has produced a concise practical guideline to highlight the key issues in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for the practicing physician in the UK. The guideline is evidence-based and levels of evidence are included in the body of the article. All patients who are to receive heparin of any sort should have a platelet count on the day of starting treatment. For patients who have been exposed to heparin in the last 100 d, a baseline platelet count and a platelet count 24 h after starting heparin should be obtained. For all patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH), alternate day platelet counts should be performed from days 4 to 14. For surgical and medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) platelet counts should be performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving treatment doses of LMWH should have platelet counts performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving prophylactic LMWH are at low risk and do not need routine platelet monitoring. If the platelet count falls by 50% or more, or falls below the laboratory normal range and/or the patient develops new thrombosis or skin allergy between days 4 and 14 of heparin administration HIT should be considered and a clinical assessment made. If the pretest probability of HIT is high, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant started at full dosage unless there are significant contraindications while laboratory tests are performed. Platelet activation assays using washed platelets have a higher sensitivity than platelet aggregation assays but are technically demanding and their use should be restricted to laboratories experienced in the technique. Non-expert laboratories should use an antigen-based assay of high sensitivity. Only IgG class antibodies need to be measured. Useful information is gained by reporting the actual optical density, inhibition by high concentrations of heparin, and the cut-off value for a positive test rather than simply reporting the test as positive or negative. In making a diagnosis of HIT the clinician's estimate of the pretest probability of HIT together with the type of assay used and its quantitative result (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, only) should be used to determine the overall probability of HIT. Clinical decisions should be made following consideration of the risks and benefits of treatment with an alternative anticoagulant. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, heparin should be stopped and full-dose anticoagulation with an alternative, such as lepirudin or danaparoid, commenced (in the absence of a significant contraindication). Warfarin should not be used until the platelet count has recovered. When introduced in combination with warfarin, an alternative anticoagulant must be continued until the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is therapeutic for two consecutive days. Platelets should not be given for prophylaxis. Lepirudin, at doses adjusted to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio of 1.5-2.5, reduces the risk of reaching the composite endpoint of limb amputation, death or new thrombosis in patients with HIT and HIT with thrombosis (HITT). The risk of major haemorrhage is directly related to the APTT ratio, lepirudin levels and serum creatinine levels. The patient's renal function needs to be taken into careful consideration before treatment with lepirudin is commenced. Severe anaphylaxis occurs rarely in recipients of lepirudin and is more common in previously exposed patients. Danaparoid in a high-dose regimen is equivalent to lepirudin in the treatment of HIT and HITT. Danaparoid at prophylactic doses is not recommended for the treatment of HIT or HITT. Patients with previous HIT who are antibody negative (usually so after >100 d) who require cardiac surgery should receive intraoperative UFH in preference to other anticoagulants that are less validated for this purpose. Pre- and postoperative anticoagulation should be with an anticoagulant other than UFH or LMWH. Patients with recent or active HIT should have the need for surgery reviewed and delayed until the patient is antibody negative if possible. They should then proceed as above. If deemed appropriate early surgery should be carried out with an alternative anticoagulant. We recommend discussion of these complex cases requiring surgery with an experienced centre. The diagnosis must be clearly recorded in the patient's medical record.     

Warfarin-induced limb gangrene in the setting of lung adenocarcinoma

A 53-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma developed pulmonary embolism and bilateral popliteal venous thrombosis. Treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin and discharged home on warfarin, he returned a week later with extending thrombosis. Treatment with heparin followed by warfarin was reinitiated. Twenty-four hours following the re-administration of warfarin, the patient's INR increased to 14.5. The platelet count dropped by more than 50%, and he developed venous limb gangrene of the left leg and skin necrosis of the right leg. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was ruled out, and coagulation studies showed a severe depletion of protein C as well as increased thrombin generation. The patient was transfused with fresh frozen plasma, and vitamin K was given. Heparin was continued, and after 4 weeks, the patient improved markedly showing only minimal necrosis of the toes. Venous limb gangrene is a major complication associated with warfarin therapy. Its pathogenesis is explained by a transient hypercoagulable state produced by protein C depletion that leads to microvascular thrombi progressing to venous limb gangrene. The present case emphasizes the importance of careful anticoagulation with heparin followed by slow initiation of low-dose warfarin, in order to minimize thrombotic complications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Summary Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), next to bleeding complications, is the most important side-effect of heparin therapy in cardiac patients and the most frequently found thrombocytopenia induced by medication. Two types of HIT are distinguished on the basis of both severity of disease, and pathophysiology: type I HIT is an early, transient, clinically harmless form of thrombocytopenia, due to direct heparin-induced platelet aggregation. Thromboembolic complications are usually not seen. No treatment is required. A normalization of platelet count even if heparin is continued is a usual observation. Type II HIT is more severe than type I HIT and is frequently complicated by extension of preexisting venous thromboembolism or new arterial thrombosis. The thrombocytopenia is caused by a pathogenic heparin-dependent IgG antibody (HIT-IgG) that recognizes as its target antigen a complex consisting of heparin and platelet factor IV. Type II HIT should be suspected when the platelet count falls to less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter or less than 50% of the base line value 5 to 15 days after heparin therapy is begun, or sooner in a patient who received heparin in the recent past. The clinical diagnosis of type II HIT can be confirmed by several sensitive assays. In cases of type II HIT, heparin must be stopped immediately. However, if the patient requires continued anticoagulant therapy for an acute event such as deep venous thrombosis, substitution of an alternative rapid-acting anticoagulant drug is often needed. In the authors experience Danaparoid sodium, a low-sulfated heparinoid with a low cross-reactivity (10%) to heparin, can be regarded as an effective anticoagulant in patients with type II HIT. Preliminary experiences with intravenous recombinant hirudin are also encouraging and suggest that this direct thrombin inhibitor will emerge as a valuable alternative treatment for patients who suffer from HIT.     

Spontaneous HIT syndrome post-knee replacement surgery with delayed recovery of thrombocytopenia: a case report and literature review

Recently published reports have established a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-mimicking thromboembolic disorder without proximate heparin exposure, called spontaneous HIT syndrome. Although the pathophysiology remains unclear, anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies possibly triggered by exposure to knee cartilage glycosaminoglycans or other non-heparin polyanions found on bacterial surfaces and nucleic acids have been postulated. We present a 53-year-old female receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin following right total knee replacement surgery (without perioperative or any previous lifetime heparin exposure) who acutely presented with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and right great saphenous vein thrombophlebitis on postoperative day (POD) 14; her platelet count at presentation was 13 × 10⁹/L. Prior to diagnostic consideration of spontaneous HIT syndrome, the patient briefly received unfractionated heparin (UFH) and one dose of enoxaparin. The patient’s serum tested strongly positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies by two different PF4-dependent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and by serotonin release assay (SRA). Failure of fondaparinux anticoagulation (persisting HIT-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation) prompted switching to argatroban. Severe thrombocytopenia persisted (platelet count nadir, 12 × 10⁹/L, on POD21), and 9 days after starting argatroban symptomatic right leg deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred, prompting switch to rivaroxaban. Thereafter, her course was uneventful, although platelet count recovery was prolonged, reaching 99 × 10⁹/L by POD45 and 199 × 10⁹/L by POD79. The patient’s serum elicited strong serotonin release in the absence of heparin (seen even with 1/32 serum dilution) that was enhanced by pharmacological concentrations of UFH (0.1 and 0.3 IU/mL) and fondaparinux (0.1–1.2 μg/mL, i.e., in vitro fondaparinux “cross-reactivity”). Ultimately, platelet count recovery was associated with seroreversion to a negative SRA (documented at POD151). Our literature review identified joint replacement surgery, specifically knee replacement, to be a relatively common trigger of spontaneous HIT syndrome. Further, including our patient case, 5 of 7 patients with spontaneous HIT syndrome post-orthopedic surgery who received treatment with argatroban developed new and/or progressive lower-limb DVT or recurrent PE despite anticoagulation with this parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor, suggesting that this patient population is at high risk of breakthrough thrombotic events despite treatment with this HIT treatment-approved anticoagulant. Our case also illustrates successful outcome with rivaroxaban for treatment of spontaneous HIT syndrome, consistent with emerging literature supporting safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for treatment of acute HIT.     

New Concepts in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Diagnosis and Management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinicopathologic condition and adverse drug reaction caused by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. In most patients, the onset of thrombocytopenia begins while the patient is receiving heparin. In less than 5% of patients, the onset of thrombocytopenia begins several days following heparin discontinuation and has been termed “delayed-onset” HIT. This review summarizes the presentation and clinical course of published reports of delayed-onset HIT occurring in 30 patients. The diagnosis of delayed-onset HIT should be considered in all patients presenting with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all patients with recent heparin exposure (within the past 14 days) who present with a low platelet count. Most patients with HIT are treated with direct thrombin inhibitors and transitioned to warfarin oral anticoagulation. Administration of direct thrombin inhibitors requires close monitoring for bleeding, dose adjustments based upon coagulation monitoring and is costly. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide and indirect-acting factor-Xa inhibitor, has little to no cross-reactivity with the heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody in in vitro testing. This review summarizes dosing, monitoring and outcomes of preliminary reports of fondaparinux successfully administered to 13 patients with subacute HIT and 22 patients with acute HIT. While several reports have described the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with HIT using fondaparinux, clinical trials should be conducted and reported before fondaparinux becomes a therapy of choice for HIT.     

Late-onset warfarin-induced skin necrosis: case report and review of the literature

Warfarin-induced skin necrosis is a rare complication of therapy with warfarin or other coumarin derivatives. When it occurs it usually appears 3 to 6 days after initiation of therapy and almost always between days 1 and 10. We report a case of late-onset (16 days after initiation of therapy) warfarin-induced skin necrosis and review the literature on this rarely reported variant of warfarin-induced skin necrosis. The skin lesion in our patient was not associated with either deficiency of protein C or resistance to activated protein C. Am. J. Hematol. 57:233–237, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Bilateral lower extremity gangrene requiring amputation associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report

Heparin is a common cause of thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients. Between 10% and 15% of patients receiving therapeutic doses of heparin develop thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can cause severe bleeding and thrombosis owing to intravascular platelet aggregation. HIT must be distinguished from other causes of thrombocytopenia. Importantly, heparin use is often associated with an early fall in the platelet count that usually occurs within the first 4 days of initiation and recovers without cessation of heparin treatment. This nonimmune heparin-associated thrombocytopenia has not been found to be associated with thrombosis and does not necessitate discontinuation of heparin. The authors present a case report of a 70-year-old man who received heparin therapy following aortic tissue valve replacement and aortic root repair with graft and developed bilateral lower extremity arterial clots 6 days postoperatively in the setting of positive heparin antibody titers. Ultimately the patient required bilateral above-knee amputations.     

Dermatan sulphate in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with thromboembolic diseases who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II require an alternative anticoagulation strategy. Dermatan sulphate (DS) was administered to five patients with thromboembolic diseases who developed HIT type II and showed an in vitro cross-reactivity with low molecular weight heparins. The platelet count and the extension of thrombosis were monitored during DS administration. In four of the five patients the platelet count rapidly increased after heparin was discontinued and DS started. A low platelet count persisted in the single patient with cross-reactivity to DS, up to 4 d after its discontinuation. None of the patients experienced thrombus extension, haemorrhagic side-effects or other adverse events.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: real-world issues

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies. HIT sera often activate platelets without needing heparin-such heparin-"independent" platelet activation can be associated with HIT beginning or worsening despite stopping heparin ("delayed-onset HIT"). We address important issues in HIT diagnosis and therapy, using a recent cohort of HIT patients to illustrate influences of heparin type; triggers for HIT investigation; serological features of heparin-independent platelet activation; and treatment. In our cohort of recent HIT cases ( N?=?13), low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) was a common causative agent ( N?=?8, 62%); most patients were diagnosed after HIT-thrombosis had occurred; and danaparoid was the most frequently selected treatment. Heparin-independent platelet activation was common (7/13 [54%]) and predicted slower platelet count recovery (>1 week) among evaluable patients (5/5 vs 1/6; P?=?0.015). In our experience with argatroban-treated patients, HIT-associated consumptive coagulopathy confounds anticoagulant monitoring. Our observations provide guidance on practical aspects of HIT diagnosis and management.