Allopregnanolone does not influence ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice

Rationale The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLOP; 3-hydroxy-5-pregnan-20-one) produces behavioral and discriminative characteristics similar to that of ethanol (EtOH) and can modulate some of the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of EtOH.Objective The present experiments investigated ALLOP modulation of the effects of EtOH in a place conditioning procedure in male DBA/2J mice.Methods In a series of experiments examining different EtOH doses (1, 2 g/kg) and ALLOP administration times, ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered four times with EtOH prior to placement on a distinctive floor (CS+). On alternate days, vehicle was administered prior to a saline injection paired with the other floor stimulus (CS–). In a separate experiment, finasteride (0, 50, 100 mg/kg, IP), a 5-reductase inhibitor that blocks ALLOP synthesis, was administered prior to both CS+ and CS– trials. In a final experiment, animals were place conditioned to EtOH alone, and ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered prior to the preference test only.Results During conditioning, ALLOP increased and finasteride decreased EtOH-stimulated activity compared with vehicle pretreatment. Acquisition of 2 g/kg EtOH-induced conditioned place preference was observed in all mice, regardless of treatment with either ALLOP or finasteride. Similarly, ALLOP did not modulate the expression of EtOH-induced place preference. EtOH increased brain ALLOP levels compared with saline; however, ALLOP administration produced dose-dependent elevations in brain ALLOP levels that were not further augmented by EtOH (2 g/kg) administration.Conclusions These findings indicate that ALLOP does not modulate EtOH-induced place conditioning in male DBA/2J mice.     

Lack of effect of dopamine receptor blockade on expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Abstract Rationale. Self-administration studies have suggested that dopamine (DA) is important for the reinforcing effects of ethanol. However, ethanol place conditioning studies have less consistently demonstrated a role for DA in conditioned place preference. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether blockade of D₁, D₂ or D₃ DA receptors would impact the expression of the conditioned place preference induced by ethanol in DBA/2J mice. Methods. Mice underwent an unbiased place conditioning procedure with 2 g/kg ethanol. Prior to the preference test, mice were injected i.p. with SCH23390 (0, 0.015 or 0.03 mg/kg), raclopride (0, 0.3 or 0.6 mg/kg) or U99194A (0, 10 or 20 mg/kg). Results. Ethanol produced a significant conditioned place preference that was not affected by any of the dopamine antagonists tested. Each of the antagonists decreased locomotor activity, though U99194A was minimally effective. Conclusions. These findings suggest that the conditioned reinforcing effects of ethanol in DBA/2J mice as assessed by place conditioning are mediated by non-dopaminergic mechanisms. Electronic Publication     

Extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion: effects of naloxone

 Four experiments examined the effect of naloxone pretreatment on the expression and extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (experiments 1, 2, 4) or conditioned place aversion (experiments 1, 3). DBA/2 J mice received four pairings of a distinctive tactile (floor) stimulus (CS) with injection of ethanol (2 g/kg) given either immediately before or after 5-min exposure to the CS. A different stimulus was paired with injection of saline. Pre-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place preference, whereas post-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place aversion. Both behaviors extinguished partially during repeated choice testing after vehicle injection. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) had little effect on the initial expression of conditioned place preference, but facilitated its extinction. Moreover, repeated naloxone testing resulted in the expression of a weak conditioned place aversion to the CS that initially elicited a place preference. In contrast, naloxone (1.5 or 10 mg/kg) enhanced expression of conditioned place aversion, thereby increasing its resistance to extinction. A control experiment (experiment 4) indicated that repeated testing with a different aversive drug, lithium chloride, did not affect rate of extinction or produce an aversion to the CS previously paired with ethanol. These findings do not support the suggestion that naloxone facilitates the general processes that underlie extinction of associative learning. Also, these data are not readily explained by the conditioning of place aversion at the time of testing. Rather, naloxone’s effects appear to reflect a selective influence on maintenance of ethanol’s conditioned rewarding effect, an effect that may be mediated by release of endogenous opioids. Overall, these findings encourage further consideration of the use of opiate antagonists in the treatment of alcoholism. Received: 4 December 1997 / Final version: 16 February 1998     

Genetic differences in naloxone enhancement of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

The influence of the opioid system on acquisition of an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion was examined in alcohol-preferring and avoiding inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J). Fluid-deprived mice from each strain received either ethanol alone, naloxone alone, or both ethanol and naloxone immediately after access to a novel tasting fluid. Naloxone alone (1 or 3 mg/kg) did not induce a conditioned taste aversion in either strain of mice. Administration of ethanol (1.5 g/kg) to DBA/2J mice produced a moderate taste aversion that was not affected by co-administration of naloxone. Although ethanol administered alone (3 g/kg) did not cause a taste aversion in C57BL/6J mice, the combination of ethanol and the higher dose of naloxone produced a significant taste aversion that increased across trials. A second experiment addressed the possibility that naloxone failed to enhance the ethanol-induced condition taste aversion in DBA/2J mice due to a floor effect on consumption. A lower ethanol dose (1 g/kg) was given alone or in combination with naloxone (1 or 3 mg/kg). Again, ethanol produced a moderate conditioned taste aversion that was not potentiated by naloxone. Subsequent conditioning with a high ethanol dose produced further suppression of intake, confirming that naloxone's failure to enhance aversion on earlier trials was not due to a floor effect. These data demonstrate a strain specific interaction between the aversive effect of ethanol and naloxone. More specifically, the results indicate that blockade of opioid receptors enhances the aversive effect of ethanol in C57BL/6J but not DBA/2J mice, suggesting that genetically determined differences in the endogenous opioid system of alcohol-preferring mice may mitigate ethanol's aversive effect.     

Haloperidol reduces ethanol-induced motor activity stimulation but not conditioned place preference

This experiment examined the impact of a dopamine receptor blocker on ethanol's rewarding effect in a place conditioning paradigm. DBA/2J mice received four pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, IP) + ethanol, or haloperidol alone. A different stimulus was paired with saline. Ethanol produced increases in locomotor activity that were reduced by haloperidol. However, conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus was not affected by haloperidol. Haloperidol alone decreased locomotor activity during conditioning and produced a place aversion. These results indicate a dissociation of ethanol's activating and rewarding effects. Moreover, they suggest that ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference is mediated by nondopaminergic mechanisms.     

Pentylenetetrazol produces a state-dependent conditioned place aversion to alcohol withdrawal in mice

The purpose of this study was to determine if aversive effects of alcohol withdrawal could be detected in mice using the place conditioning procedure and whether the GABA_A receptor antagonist, pentylenetetrazol (PTZ), would increase the aversive effects of alcohol withdrawal and increase the probability of detecting conditioned place aversion. Subjects were alcohol-naïve mice from a specific line selectively bred for low alcohol preference (LAP1; n = 91) and were assigned to three groups: alcohol withdrawal, PTZ alone, and PTZ + alcohol withdrawal. On four trials, mice received either a 4.0 g/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of alcohol (alcohol withdrawal, PTZ + alcohol withdrawal groups) or saline (PTZ group) 8 h prior to being placed on a distinctive floor texture for a 30-min conditioning session. Five minutes before these sessions, mice in the PTZ and PTZ + alcohol withdrawal groups received PTZ (5.0 mg/kg; i.p.) and the alcohol withdrawal group received saline. On intervening days mice received two saline injections at the same time points prior to being placed on a different floor texture. Post-conditioning floor preference was assessed in two 60-min tests; the first test was drug-free and the second test was state-dependent. Neither alcohol withdrawal nor PTZ produced significant place conditioning. The PTZ + alcohol withdrawal group showed a significant place aversion during the state-dependent test. These data suggest that the combined stimulus properties of PTZ and alcohol withdrawal facilitated the expression of conditioned place aversion to alcohol withdrawal.     

Central administration of nociceptin/orphanin FQ blocks the acquisition of conditioned place preference to morphine and cocaine, but not conditioned place aversion to naloxone in mice

Rationale Previous studies have suggested that nociceptin (known also as orphanin FQ) suppresses the rewarding potential of morphine and alcohol in the rat. However, little is known of the effect of nociceptin on the rewarding properties of these and other drugs in the mouse.Objective To determine the effect of nociceptin on opiate or psychostimulant-induced conditioned place preference, or naloxone-induced conditioned place aversion in mice.Methods C57BL6 mice were implanted with chronically indwelling intracranial cannulae targeted at the lateral cerebroventricle through which nociceptin (0.06, 0.6, or 6 nmol) could be administered. Animals were conditioned in an unbiased balanced paradigm to study the effect of nociceptin administration alone, or the effect of nociceptin on the acquisition of place conditioning to morphine, cocaine, or naloxone (all 7.6 mg/kg subcutaneous).Results Administration of 0.06 nmol nociceptin alone stimulated locomotion during conditioning sessions, but had no hedonic effects. In contrast, administration of 6 nmol nociceptin alone markedly reduced basal locomotion during the conditioning sessions and induced a mild place aversion. Both morphine and cocaine induced robust place preferences, the acquisition of which was dose dependently suppressed by administration of nociceptin at doses of 0.6 nmol and above. Conditioning with naloxone produced a robust place aversion that was only weakly blocked by the maximum dose of nociceptin tested.Conclusion Nociceptin blocks the rewarding properties of drugs in both narcotic analgesic and psychostimulant classes in the mouse. In contrast, nociceptin has only a minor effect on the negative affective state experienced following naloxone administration.     

Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice

Rationale Reduced expression of a drug-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) may reflect a decrease in the drug’s conditioned rewarding effects. However, CPP is also open to disruption by processes unrelated to the underlying motivation. In unpublished studies, we previously observed that ethanol pretreatment before testing disrupted expression of ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. We hypothesized that this interference effect was due to large ethanol-induced increases in activity. Objective The present studies were designed to examine the relationship between test activity and expression of ethanol-induced CPP both in the presence and absence of ethanol. To assess the generality of this relationship, we examined these effects both in DBA/2J (which are highly activated by ethanol) and in NZB/B1NJ mice (which show similar CPP, but less ethanol-induced activation). Materials and methods In separate experiments, inbred mice from each strain underwent ethanol (2 g/kg) place conditioning. Saline or ethanol was then administered immediately before the test. Results Ethanol, given immediately before the test, blocked the expression of ethanol CPP in DBA/2J, but not in NZB/B1NJ mice. Moreover, ethanol significantly increased test activity levels in DBA/2J and to a much lesser degree in NZB/B1NJ mice. Correlation analyses showed an inverse phenotypic relationship between preference and test activity, reflecting stronger preferences in less active mice. Conclusions Disruption of ethanol-CPP observed in DBA/2J mice may be a consequence of high ethanol-induced activity levels. More generally, these studies suggest that competing behaviors can affect expression of a drug-induced CPP independent of affecting the conditioned rewarding effects of the drug.     

Differential effects of GABAA and GABAB agonists on sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in DBA/2 J mice

 Contemporary theories of drug abuse suggest that behavioral sensitization plays an important role in addiction. However, few studies have examined the mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization to ethanol. The present study examined the ability of THIP (2, 4, or 8 mg/kg) and baclofen (5.0, 6.25, or 7.5 mg/kg), GABA_A and GABA_B agonists, respectively, to prevent development of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol (2 g/kg) in DBA/2 J mice. Ethanol was administered immediately before four 5-min activity trials conducted at 48-h intervals. Administration of ethanol on each of the four trials resulted in behavioral sensitization in control groups. While having few effects on activity when given alone, both GABA agonists completely blocked the acute stimulant response to ethanol on the first trial. Administration of THIP prior to ethanol on each trial failed to prevent development of sensitization. In contrast, all doses of baclofen blocked sensitization. Assessment of blood ethanol levels 15, 50 and 100 min after administration of ethanol indicated that baclofen did not change the pharmacokinetics of ethanol. These results indicate an important role for GABA_B receptors, but not GABA_A receptors, in development of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. Received: 11 April 1998 / Final version: 24 June 1998     

Post-retrieval propranolol treatment does not modulate reconsolidation or extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference

The reconsolidation hypothesis posits that established emotional memories, when reactivated, become labile and susceptible to disruption. Post-retrieval injection of propranolol (PRO), a nonspecific β-adrenergic receptor antagonist, impairs subsequent retention performance of a cocaine- and a morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), implicating the noradrenergic system in the reconsolidation processes of drug-seeking behavior. An important question is whether post-retrieval PRO disrupts memory for the drug-cue associations, or instead interferes with extinction. In the present study, we evaluated the role of the β-adrenergic system on the reconsolidation and extinction of ethanol-induced CPP. Male DBA/2J mice were trained using a weak or a strong conditioning procedure, achieved by varying the ethanol conditioning dose (1 or 2 g/kg) and the number of ethanol trials (2 or 4). After acquisition of ethanol CPP, animals were given a single post-retrieval injection of PRO (0, 10 or 30 mg/kg) and tested for memory reconsolidation 24 h later. Also, after the first reconsolidation test, mice received 18 additional 15-min choice extinction tests in which PRO was injected immediately after every test. Contrary to the prediction of the reconsolidation hypothesis, a single PRO injection after the retrieval test did not modify subsequent memory retention. In addition, repeated post-retrieval administration of PRO did not interfere with extinction of CPP in mice. Overall, our data suggest that the β-adrenergic receptor does not modulate the associative processes underlying ethanol CPP.     

Diazepam-induced place preference conditioning: Appetitive and antiaversive properties

The place conditioning paradigm was used to examine the reinforcing properties of diazepam. Rats were injeccted with diazepam (0.5–5.0 mg/kg, IP) and 30 min later were confined for 30 min to one side of a shuttle box, in which each of the two compartments had distinctive features. On alternate (control) days they received vehicle injections and were confined for 30 min to the opposite side. At almost all doses tested, diazepam produced place preference for the distinctive compartment that had been previously associated with the drug. Preference for the drug side developed regardless of whether diazepam was paired or unpaired with the least-preferred side, and regardless of whether testing was carried out in the undrugged or in the drugged state. The rats preferred the drug side over a novel compartment, but they did not change their initial preference for the side when diazepam was given after removal from the training box.Animals injected with meprobamate (70 mg/kg, PO), a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic, also developed conditioned preference for the drug side, comparable to that seen following cocaine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg, IP).The diazepam (2.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference was antagonized by CGS 8216 (3 mg/kg, IP), picrotoxin (2 mg/kg, IP) and naloxone (0.8 mg/kg, SC), injected 3 min before and 15 and 20 min after diazepam respectively. Sodium valproate (200 mg/kg, IP) did not influence diazepam (1 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Sodium valproate by itself had marginal effects on place conditioning. Picrotoxin and naloxone, but not CGS 8816, produced place aversion which, in the case of picrotoxin, was due to state dependent learning. The results provide a clear indication that the place preference paradigm is valid as a test for evaluating appetitive properties of minor tranquilizers. They suggest that the rewarding effects of diazepam are mediated through central benzodiazepine receptors. Wheter GABA and/or endogenous opioid peptides are involved in the reinforcing properties of diazepam remains an open question.A preliminary report of this research was made at the 14 C.I.N.P. Congress (Florence 1984)     

Differential effects of 7-OH-DPAT on amphetamine-induced stereotypy and conditioned place preference

 Low doses of the dopamine D₃-preferring agonist 7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) produce a behavioral profile that is opposite to that produced by the psychomotor stimulants cocaine and amphetamine. For example, low doses of 7-OH-DPAT produce conditioned place aversion and hypolocomotion, whereas psychomotor stimulants produce conditioned place preference (CPP) and hyperlocomotion. In experiment 1, the effects of low doses of 7-OH-DPAT (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) on d-amphetamine-induced (1 mg/kg) motor behaviors and CPP were assessed. In experiment 2, the effects of 0.1 mg/kg 7-OH-DPAT on d-amphetamine (0–10 mg/kg) dose-response curves for the same behaviors were examined. During conditioning, drug injections were paired with a distinct compartment, whereas saline injections were paired with another compartment. Locomotion and headbobbing were measured following acute and repeated drug administration during conditioning and place conditioning was assessed 24 h following the last conditioning day. In experiment 1, d-amphetamine-induced locomotion was dose-dependently decreased by 7-OH-DPAT following repeated administration, which was probably due to the emergence of headbobbing, a behavior not observed with d-amphetamine alone. d-Amphetamine-CPP was not altered by co-administration of 0–0.03 mg/kg 7-OH-DPAT, but was attenuated by co-administration of 0.1 mg/kg 7-OH-DPAT. In experiment 2, 7-OH-DPAT co-administered with low doses of d-amphetamine (0–0.5 mg/kg) produced a decrease in locomotion following acute administration. However, 7-OH-DPAT produced sensitization of locomotion at the 0.5 mg/kg dose of d-amphetamine and an increase in headbobbing at the 0.5–10 mg/kg doses of d-amphetamine following repeated administration. In contrast, d-amphetamine-CPP was attenuated by co-administration of 7-OH-DPAT. These findings suggest that 0.1 mg/kg 7-OH-DPAT attenuates the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine despite enhancing stereotypic behaviors. Received: 14 May 1997 / Final version: 22 January 1998     

Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, but not aversion, is blocked by treatment with d-penicillamine, an inactivation agent for acetaldehyde

Rationale There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. d-penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that d-penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice. Objectives The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design. Methods Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS−: GRID− or HOLE−), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received d-penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS−floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of d-penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP). Results CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but d-penicillamine only blocked CPP. d-penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by d-penicillamine pretreatment. Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.     

Effects of early handling on amphetamine-induced locomotor activation and conditioned place preference in the adult rat

  Rationale: Altered hormonal stress responsiveness has been implicated in psychostimulant responsivity, and early handling represents a mild environmental manipulation which alters the hormonal profile following stress exposure. Objective: The present experiments examined whether early handling in rats would alter locomotor effects of amphetamine, as well as cross-sensitization of locomotor responsiveness after chronic stress. Conditioned place preference (CPP) for amphetamine was also measured. Methods: Handling consisted of daily 15-min isolation periods from days 1–12 postnatally. Novelty- and amphetamine (0, 1.5 mg/kg)-induced locomotion were examined using circular corridors in adult rats that were either restrained repeatedly over 8 days or not disturbed prior to testing. The effects of handling on amphetamine (0, 1, 2, 5 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP) were also examined following 3 days of drug-compartment pairings. Results: Early handling produced a more rapid post-stress recovery in corticosterone levels. Handled animals also exhibited a significant attenuation in amphetamine-induced CPP compared to non-handled controls. Locomotor responsiveness to novelty and amphetamine was not altered by early handling. Although no cross-sensitization was observed, evidence for stress sensitization was seen, but was unaffected by early handling. Conclusions: Handled animals showed an attenuated CPP for amphetamine, data suggesting that sensitivity to the reward value of drugs of abuse in adulthood may be susceptible to relatively minor environmental manipulations early in life. This effect of handling on CPP does not seem to reflect differences in locomotor sensitivity to amphetamine. Received: 5 August 1998 / Final version: 2 November 1998     

Food-deprivation increases cocaine-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in rats

 Food-deprivation increases the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine and other drugs within self-administration experiments. In this study, the effects of food-deprivation on cocaine-induced conditioned place preference were investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to one of two feeding conditions: satiated (with ad libitum food) or deprived (maintained at 80% of free-feeding body weights). During conditioning trials, on alternate days, rats received IP injections of cocaine (0.0, 2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg; n=12 per dose group) and were confined for 30 min in one of two distinct environments. On intervening days, the same rats were injected with saline and confined for 30 min in the opposite environment. After four cocaine and four saline trials, a 15-min choice test (with no injections) was given. During this time, the rats were able to move freely through a passageway between both environments. Relative to the food-satiated rats, the food-deprived rats showed a greater conditioned preference for the cocaine-paired environment during the choice test, greater cocaine-induced locomotor activity during conditioning trials, and a greater degree of sensitization to the activating effects of cocaine across conditioning trials. This study extends the general findings of food deprivation-induced increases in the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine to include the conditioned place preference paradigm. Received: 23 January 1996 / Final version: 4 December 1996     

Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice

RATIONALE: Although the distinction between "biased" and "unbiased" is generally recognized as an important methodological issue in place conditioning, previous studies have not adequately addressed the distinction between a biased/unbiased apparatus and a biased/unbiased stimulus assignment procedure. Moreover, a review of the recent literature indicates that many reports (70% of 76 papers published in 2001) fail to provide adequate information about apparatus bias. This issue is important because the mechanisms underlying a drug's effect in the place-conditioning procedure may differ depending on whether the apparatus is biased or unbiased. OBJECTIVES: The present studies were designed to assess the impact of apparatus bias and stimulus assignment procedure on ethanol-induced place conditioning in mice (DBA/2 J). A secondary goal was to compare various dependent variables commonly used to index conditioned place preference. METHODS: Apparatus bias was manipulated by varying the combination of tactile (floor) cues available during preference tests. Experiment 1 used an unbiased apparatus in which the stimulus alternatives were equally preferred during a pre-test as indicated by the group average. Experiment 2 used a biased apparatus in which one of the stimuli was strongly preferred by most mice (mean % time on cue = 67%) during the pre-test. In both studies, the stimulus paired with drug (CS+) was assigned randomly (i.e., an "unbiased" stimulus assignment procedure). Experimental mice received four pairings of CS+ with ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) and four pairings of the alternative stimulus (CS-) with saline; control mice received saline on both types of trial. Each experiment concluded with a 60-min choice test. RESULTS: With the unbiased apparatus (experiment 1), significant place conditioning was obtained regardless of whether drug was paired with the subject's initially preferred or non-preferred stimulus. However, with the biased apparatus (experiment 2), place conditioning was apparent only when ethanol was paired with the initially non-preferred cue, and not when it was paired with the initially preferred cue. These conclusions held regardless of which dependent variable was used to index place conditioning, but only if the counterbalancing factor was included in statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS:These studies indicate that apparatus bias plays a major role in determining whether biased assignment of an ethanol-paired stimulus affects ability to demonstrate conditioned place preference. Ethanol's ability to produce conditioned place preference in an unbiased apparatus, regardless of the direction of the initial cue bias, supports previous studies that interpret such findings as evidence of a primary rewarding drug effect. Moreover, these studies suggest that the asymmetrical outcome observed in the biased apparatus is most likely due to a measurement problem (e.g., ceiling effect) rather than to an interaction between the drug's effect and an unconditioned motivational response (e.g., "anxiety") to the initially non-preferred stimulus. More generally, these findings illustrate the importance of providing clear information on apparatus bias in all place-conditioning studies.     

Motivational effects of opioids: evidence on the role of endorphins in mediating reward or aversion

It has been suggested that endogenous peptides with opiate-like effects may contribute to the mediation of reward or aversion. One line of evidence relating to these hypotheses derives from studies of the motivational effects of opioids. The ability of opioid agonists and antagonists to serve as positively reinforcing or aversive stimuli is reviewed, with results compared across several different behavioural procedures. The results for rewarding effects are consistent and independent of procedure: in self-administration, conditioned place preference and conditioned taste preference studies, opioid agonists are consistently effective whereas antagonists are inactive. Results for indices of aversive effects are more difficult to interpret because they are, to some extent, dependent on the procedure used. Neither agonists nor antagonists seem able to support operant escape/avoidance conditioning. Agonists can support taste aversion and place aversion conditioning to some extent, whereas antagonists are clearly active in both procedures. The results provide some support for the involvement of enkephalins or endorphins in reward and aversion, but there are significant gaps and contradictions in the evidence.     

Conditioning tastant and the acquisition of conditioned taste avoidance to drugs of abuse in DBA/2J mice

RATIONALE: Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) produced by drugs of abuse such as morphine and cocaine has been interpreted as representing the rewarding actions of these drugs. Evidence for this interpretation is based, in part, on findings in rats indicating saccharin is a more effective conditioning flavor compared to salt (NaCl). However, our studies with ethanol have found salt to be a highly effective conditioning flavor in mice. OBJECTIVES: The present series of studies examined the acquisition of CTA to morphine, ethanol, lithium chloride, and cocaine. Further, saccharin and salt were utilized in each experiment in order to determine effectiveness of each flavor to serve as a conditioning stimulus. METHODS: In four separate experiments, adult male DBA/2J mice were acclimated to a 2 h/day water restriction regimen. Subsequently they received four conditioning trials consisting of 1 h access to either 0.15% w/v saccharin or 0.1 M salt followed by 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg morphine (experiment 1), 0, 2, or 4 g/kg ethanol (experiment 2), 0, 1.5 or 3.0 milliequivalents/kg lithium chloride (experiment 3) or 0, 10 or 20 mg/kg cocaine (experiment 4). A fifth flavor access period (trial 5) was not followed by drug exposure. Following trial 5, each subject received 24-h access to the conditioning flavor and water (two-bottle test 1). Control subjects (0 dose groups from each experiment) received a second two-bottle test with 24-h access to both saccharin and salt flavors. RESULTS: Reduced flavor intake and reduced flavor preference was noted in all drug-paired groups in each experiment. However, more rapid development of CTA was seen with the saccharin flavor in morphine- or cocaine-paired groups. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA appeared more rapidly with the salt flavor. Lithium-induced CTA was modest, and emerged equally with either flavor. CONCLUSIONS: CTA induced by morphine or cocaine in mice occurs in a similar pattern to that seen in rats, and these findings agree with an interpretation based on drug reward. In contrast, ethanol-induced CTA is more likely attributable to aversive effects.     

Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice

Genetic differences in ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference were studied in 20 BXD Recombinant Inbred (RI) mouse strains and in the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J progenitor strains. Male mice from each strain were exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) was paired four times with ethanol (2 g/kg). A different floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with saline. Control mice were injected only with saline. Floor preference testing without ethanol revealed significant genetic differences in conditioned place preference, with some strains spending nearly 80% time on the ethanolpaired floor while others spent only 50% (i.e., no preference). Control mice showed genetic differences in unconditioned preference for the floor cues, but unconditioned preference was not genetically correlated with conditioned preference. There were also substantial genetic differences in ethanol-stimulated activity, but contrary to psychomotor stimulant theory, ethanol-induced activity on conditioning trials was not positively correlated with strength of conditioned place preference. However, there was a significant negative genetic correlation (r=–0.42) between test session activity and preference. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses showed strong associations (P<0.01) between conditioned place preference and marker loci on chromosomes 4, 8, 9, 18 and 19. Weaker associations (0.01<P<0.05) were identified on several other chromosomes. Analysis also yielded several significant QTL for unconditioned preference, ethanol-stimulated activity, and sensitization. Overall, these data support the conclusion that genotype influences ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, presumably via genetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol's rewarding effects. Moreover, several chromosomal regions containing candidate genes of potential relevance to ethanol-induced conditioned place preference have been identified.     

Morphine and ethanol pretreatment effects on expression and extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice

Psychopharmacology - Opioid receptor antagonists reliably alter the expression or extinction of ethanol’s conditioned motivational effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure,...