Development of a wheelchair maintenance training programme and questionnaire for clinicians and wheelchair users

Purpose of state: The aims of this study were to develop a Wheelchair Maintenance Training Programme (WMTP) as a tool for clinicians to teach wheelchair users (and caregivers when applicable) in a group setting to perform basic maintenance at home in the USA and to develop a Wheelchair Maintenance Training Questionnaire (WMT-Q) to evaluate wheelchair maintenance knowledge in clinicians, manual and power wheelchair users.

Methods: The WMTP and WMT-Q were developed through an iterative process.

Results: A convenience sample of clinicians (n?=?17), manual wheelchair (n ∞ 5), power wheelchair users (n?=?4) and caregivers (n?=?4) provided feedback on the training programme. A convenience sample of clinicians (n?=?38), manual wheelchair (n?=?25), and power wheelchair users (n?=?30) answered the WMT-Q throughout different phases of development. The subscores of the WMT-Q achieved a reliability that ranged between ICC(3,1)?=?0.48 to ICC(3,1)?=?0.89. The WMTP and WMT-Q were implemented with 15 clinicians who received in-person training in the USA using the materials developed and showed a significant increase in all except one of the WMT-Q subscores after the WMTP (p?<?0.007).

Conclusion: The WMTP will continue to be revised as it is further implemented. The WMT-Q is an acceptable instrument to measure pre- and post-training maintenance knowledge.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Wheelchair Maintenance Training Program can be used to educate rehabilitation clinicians and technicians to improve wheelchair service and delivery to end users.

• This training complements the World Health Organization basic wheelchair service curriculum, which only includes training of the clinicians, but does not include detailed information to train wheelchair users and caregivers.

• This training program offers a time efficient method for providing education to end users in a group setting that may mitigate adverse consequences resulting from wheelchair breakdown.

• This training program has significant potential for impact among wheelchair users in areas where access to repair services is limited.

     

Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users

Lindquist NJ, Loudon PE, Magis TF, Rispin JE, Kirby RL, Manns PJ. Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the Wheelchair Skills Test Version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users.

Objective

To evaluate the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the total performance and safety scores of the Wheelchair Skills Test version 4.1 (WST 4.1) for manual wheelchairs operated by adult wheelchair users.

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

University research setting.

Participants

People (N=11) who used manual wheelchairs for community locomotion.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Participants were videotaped as they completed the WST 4.1 (30 skills) on 2 separate occasions 1 to 2 weeks apart. Subsequently, raters scored the WST 4.1 from the video recordings and each participant received a total score for performance and safety. Using those scores, interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability were determined by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Percentages of agreement between raters for individual skills also were calculated.

Results

Mean ± SD overall WST 4.1 scores for performance and safety were 80.1%±8.5% and 98.0%±2.8%. ICCs for the interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability of the performance component were .855, .950, and .901 (P<.001). Safety component ICC scores were .061 (P=.243), .228 (P=.048), and .254 (P=.041). Percentages of agreement between raters for each test item for both the performance and safety scales ranged from 68% to 100%.

Conclusions

Reliability of the performance component of the WST 4.1 was excellent, whereas ICCs for the safety component indicated only slight to fair agreement, probably because of the low variability in safety scores. Additional study is needed to further evaluate the reliability of the safety component with a larger and more diverse sample group.     

Test-retest reliability of movement-evoked pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain

BackgroundThe number of researchers and clinicians using movement-evoked pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain to assess shoulder pain has increased. However, the intrarater test-retest reliability of movement-evoked pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain in people with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is still unknown.ObjectiveWe examined the intrarater test-retest reliability of movement-evoked pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain in participants with RCRSP.MethodsSeventy-four participants with RCRSP performed five trials of active shoulder abduction to elicit pain under two experimental conditions: active shoulder abduction to the onset of pain and maximum range of motion (ROM). The primary outcome measures were pain intensity and ROM. Test-retest reliability of movement-evoked pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain was examined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_3,1) and minimal detectable change (MDC₉₀).ResultsThe reliability of movement-evoked pain under both experimental conditions was good to excellent (ICC: 0.81 to 0.95), while the reliability of sensitivity to movement-evoked pain was poor in both conditions (ICC≤0.45). The MDC₉₀ for pain intensity was 1.6 and 1.8 during shoulder abduction to the onset of pain and maximum ROM, respectively. The MDC₉₀ for ROM was 17.5° and 11.2° during shoulder abduction to the onset of pain and maximum ROM condition, respectively.ConclusionThis study confirms movement-evoked pain testing during active shoulder abduction to the onset of pain or maximum ROM condition is reliable to assess pain associated with movement in patients with RCRSP. The minimal detectable change score of movement-evoked pain can guide clinicians and researchers on how to interpret changes in these outcomes.     

Reliability of the Craniocervical Posture Assessment: Visual and Angular Measurements Using Photographs and Radiographs

ObjectiveThe purposes of this study were to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the craniocervical posture in a sagittal view using quantitative measurements on photographs and radiographs and to determine the agreement of the visual assessment of posture between raters.MethodsOne photograph and 1 radiograph of the sagittal craniocervical posture were simultaneously taken from 39 healthy female subjects. Three angles were measured on the photographs and 10 angles on the radiographs of 22 subjects using Alcimage software (Alcimage; Uberlândia, MG, Brazil). Two repeated measurements were performed by 2 raters. The measurements were compared within and between raters to test the intrarater and interrater reliability, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient and SEM were used. κ Agreement was calculated for the visual assessment of 39 subjects using photographs and radiographs between 2 raters.ResultsGood to excellent intrarater and interrater intraclass correlation coefficient values were found on both photographs and radiographs. Interrater SEM was large and clinically significant for cervical lordosis photogrammetry and for 1 angle measuring cervical lordosis on radiographs. Interrater κ agreement for the visual assessment using photographs was poor (κ = 0.37).ConclusionThe raters were reliable to measure angles in photographs and radiographs to quantify craniocervical posture with exception of 2 angles measuring lordosis of the cervical spine when compared between raters. The visual assessment of posture between raters was not reliable.     

The wheelchair circuit: reliability of a test to assess mobility in persons with spinal cord injuries

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of a 9-task wheelchair circuit. DESIGN: Three test trials per subject were conducted by 2 raters. Inter- and intrarater reliability were examined. SETTING: Eight rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 27 patients (age, >or=18 y) with spinal cord injury (SCI), all of whom were in the final stage of their inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTION: A wheelchair circuit was developed to assess mobility in subjects with SCI. The circuit consisted of 9 tasks: figure-of-8 shape, doorstep crossing, mounting a platform, sprint, walking, driving up treadmill slopes of 3% and 6%, wheelchair driving and transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Task feasibility, task performance time, and peak heart rates. RESULTS: The number of tasks that subjects could perform varied from 3 to 9. Feasibility intrarater reliability was.98, and the interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was.97. Performance time ICCs ranged from.70 to.99 (mean,.88) for intrarater reliability and from.76 to.98 (mean,.92) for interrater reliability. Heart rate ICCs ranged from.64 to.96 (mean,.81) for intrarater reliability and from.82 to.99 (mean,.89) for interrater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of the wheelchair circuit was good. More research is needed to assess test validity and responsiveness.     

B-Mode Ultrasonography Is a Reliable and Valid Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Patellar Tendon Cross-Sectional Area

This study investigated the validity and reliability of measuring patellar tendon (PT) cross-sectional area (CSA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) imaging. Nineteen healthy participants (10 women, 9 men) participated in three imaging sessions of the PT, once via MRI and twice via US, with image acquisition conducted by two raters, one experienced (rater 2) and one inexperienced (rater 1). All PT segmentations were analyzed by both raters. The validity of US-derived estimates of PT CSA against MRI estimates was analyzed using linear regression. Within-day reliability of US and MRI measurements and between-day reliability of US measurements were quantified using typical error (TE) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC_3,1). There was good agreement between US- and MRI-derived estimations of PT CSA (standard errors of the estimate of 3.3 mm² for rater 1 and 2.6 mm² for rater 2; Pearson's r = 0.97 and 0.98 for raters 1 and 2, respectively). Within-session reliability for estimations of total PT CSA from US and MRI were excellent (ICC_3,1 >0.95, coefficient of variation [CV] <4.1%, TE = 1.3–3.6 mm². Between-day reliability for US was excellent (ICC_3,1 >0.97, CV <2.7%, TE = 1.6–2.3 mm²), with little difference between raters. These findings suggest that MRI and US both provide reliable estimates of PT CSA and that US can provide a valid measure of PT CSA.     

Basic Psychometric Properties of the Transfer Assessment Instrument (Version 3.0)

Objectives

To refine the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI 2.0), develop a training program for the TAI, and analyze the basic psychometric properties of the TAI 3.0, including reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and construct validity.

Design

Repeated measures.

Setting

A winter sports clinic for disabled veterans.

Participants

Wheelchair users (N=41) who perform sitting-pivot or standing-pivot transfers.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

TAI version 3.0, intraclass correlation coefficients, SEMs, and MDCs for reliable measurement of raters' responses. Spearman correlation coefficient, 1-way analysis of variance, and independent t tests to evaluate construct validity.

Results

TAI 3.0 had acceptable to high levels of reliability (range, .74–.88). The SEMs for part 1, part 2, and final scores ranged from .45 to .75. The MDC was 1.5 points on the 10-point scale for the final score. There were weak correlations (ρ range, −.13 to .25; P>.11) between TAI final scores and subjects' characteristics (eg, sex, body mass index, age, type of disability, length of wheelchair use, grip and elbow strength, sitting balance).

Conclusions

With comprehensive training, the refined TAI 3.0 yields high reliability among raters of different clinical backgrounds and experience. TAI 3.0 was unbiased toward certain physical characteristics that may influence transfer. TAI fills a void in the field by providing a quantitative measurement of transfers and a tool that can be used to detect problems and guide transfer training.     

周历活动规划中文版在大学生执行功能评测中的信度

目的 探讨周历活动规划中文版(WCPA-C)在评估大学生执行功能时的重测信度和评估者间信度。 方法 2019年8月至11月,招募18~30岁在校大学生55例参与测评。一位评估者对全部受试者采用WCPA-C评估,2周后重测;两位评估者同时使用WCPA-C对其中31例进行评估。计算重测和评估者间组内相关系数(ICC)。 结果 脱落两例。除错误数外,其余指标重测ICC为0.45~0.89,第二次结果优于首次;评估者间ICC为0.84~1.00。 结论 WCPA-C用于我国健康大学生人群,具有良好的评估者间信度,间隔2周重测可能存在学习效应。     

Reliability and validity analysis of the transfer assessment instrument

McClure LA, Boninger ML, Ozawa H, Koontz A. Reliability and validity analysis of the Transfer Assessment Instrument.

Objectives

To describe the development and evaluate the reliability and validity of a newly created outcome measure, the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI), to assess the quality of transfers performed by full-time wheelchair users.

Design

Repeated measures.

Setting

2009 National Veterans Wheelchair Games in Spokane, WA.

Participants

A convenience sample of full-time wheelchair users (N=40) who perform sitting pivot or standing pivot transfers.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for reliability and Spearman correlation coefficients for concurrent validity between the TAI and a global assessment scale (0–100 visual analog scale [VAS]).

Results

No adverse events occurred during testing. Intrarater ICCs for 3 raters ranged between .35 and .89, and the interrater ICC was .642. Correlations between the TAI and a global assessment VAS ranged between .19 (P=.285) and .69 (P>.000). Item analyses of the tool found a wide range of results, from weak to good reliability. Evaluators found the TAI to be safe and able to be completed in a short time.

Conclusions

The TAI is a safe, quick outcome measure that uses equipment typically found in a clinical setting and does not ask participants to perform new skills. Reliability and validity testing found the TAI to have acceptable interrater and a wide range of intrarater reliability. Future work indicates the need for continued refinement including removal or modification of items found to have low reliability, improved education for clinicians, and further reliability and validity analysis with a more diverse subject population. The TAI has the potential to fill a void in assessment of transfers.     

Reliability of the seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users

Purpose. To evaluate the test-retest and interrater reliability of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 1.0 (SPCMA 1.0).

Method. The participants were evaluated first by two raters and then, 3 weeks later, by one rater. Section 1 (one item, seven-point scale) evaluates the adult's overall ability to control its posture in a sitting position. Sections 2 and 3 (22 items each, scored on a seven-point scale), evaluate the adult's postural alignment in a static position and the changes in postural alignment induced by a dynamic activity.

Results. For the test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of section 1 was excellent (0.95) and moderate to good for sections 2 and 3 (0.60 – 0.62) and their subsections (0.47 – 0.78). For interrater reliability, the three sections had good to excellent ICCs (0.68 – 0.93) and their subsections had moderate to good ICCs (0.41 – 0.69). A large range was observed in Kappa coefficients (test-retest and interrater reliability) for the item analysis of the sections 2 and 3, due to a lack of variability in some items.

Conclusions. The results confirm that the SPCMA is reliable as a whole. Suitable information has been obtained for the development of the SPCMA 2.0 and, although further psychometric testing is needed, the latter should improve clinical evaluation of seated postural control in adult wheelchair users.     

Interrater and intrarater reliability of ultrasonographic measurements of acromion-greater tuberosity distance in healthy people

Acromion-greater tuberosity (AGT) distance could potentially be used to assess rotator cuff tears and shoulder subluxation in patients with poststroke hemiplegia. The aim of this study was to assess the interrater and intrarater reliability of ultrasonographic measurements of AGT distance in healthy people prior to testing on patient populations. Twenty healthy individuals (9 male, 11 female) with a mean age of 21 years (SD±2) were recruited. Three final year physiotherapy students (mean age 23 years) recorded the ultrasonographic measurements of AGT distance by using a standardised protocol. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM). The mean AGT distances, as measured by rater one, two, and three were 2.24±0.45?cm, 2.27±0.37?cm, and 2.21±0.31, respectively. The interrater reliability coefficient was ICC=0.79, and the intrarater reliability coefficients were 0.88, 0.84, and 0.91 for each rater. The SEM for the AGT distance measurements was ≤0.15?cm for all three raters. Ultrasonographic measurements of AGT distance demonstrate good intrarater and interrater reliability in healthy individuals even when measured by three relatively inexperienced raters. It has potential to provide quantitative measurements for the clinical management of pathologies such as poststroke shoulder subluxation and rotator cuff tears.     

Reliability of an Observational Biomechanical Analysis Tool in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers

BackgroundImproper pitching mechanics are a risk factor for arm injuries. While 3-dimensional (3D) motion analysis remains the gold standard for evaluation, most pitchers and clinicians do not have access to this costly technology. Recent advances in 2-dimensional (2D) video technology provide acceptable resolution for clinical analysis. However, no systematic assessment tools for pitching analysis exist.PurposeTo determine the reliability of the Assessment of biomeChanical Efficiency System (ACES) screening tool using 2D video analysis to identify common biomechanical errors in adolescent pitchers.Study DesignCross-sectional.MethodsAdolescent baseball pitchers underwent analysis using 2D video in indoor settings. Observational mechanics were collected using a 20-item scoring tool (ACES) based on 2D video analysis. Fleiss’ kappa, interclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and frequencies were used to examine intra-/interrater reliability based on common pitching errors.ResultsTwenty asymptomatic pitchers ages 12-18 years were included. Total ACES scores ranged from 1 to 13, normally distributed. ACES total score demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability within each rater (ICC for rater 1 = 0.99 (95% CI; 0.98, 0.99); ICC for rater 2 = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97); ICC for rater 3 = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99)). There was excellent interrater reliability across the trials and raters (ICC = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96). The ACES tool demonstrated acceptable kappas for individual items and strong ICC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.96) for total scores across the trials. Regarding identification of biomechanical errors, “front side position” was rated erroneous in 84/120 ratings (70%), stride length in 52/120 ratings (43.3%) and lead hip position in 53/120 ratings (44.2%).ConclusionsThe 20-item ACES scoring tool with 2D video analysis demonstrated excellent intra- and interrater reliability when utilized by raters of different musculoskeletal disciplines. Future studies validating 2D vs. 3D methodology are warranted before ACES is widely disseminated and utilized for adolescent pitchers. ACES is a practical and reliable clinical assessment tool utilizing 2D video analysis for coaches, instructors, and sports medicine providers to screen adolescent pitchers for common biomechanical errors.Level of Evidence3b     

A Screening Tool for Patients With Lumbar Instability: A Content Validity and Rater Reliability of Thai Version

ObjectiveLumbar instability is a condition that has been extensively reported in its prevalence and its effect on patients. To date, however, a clinical screening tool for this condition has not been developed for use in Thailand. The objectives of this study were to translate and test the content validity and rater reliability of a screening tool for evaluating Thai patients with lumbar instability.MethodsThe investigators selected the lumbar instability questionnaire from an original English version. Elements of the tool comprised the dominant subjective findings reported by this clinical population. The screening tool was translated into the Thai language following a process of cross-cultural adaptation. The index of item-objective congruence (IOC) was checked for content validity by 5 independent experts. Seventy-five Thai patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain were asked to report their symptoms. The interview procedure using the tool was conducted by expert and novice physical therapists, which informed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter- and intrarater reliability.ResultsThe IOC was 0.95. The interrater ICC between expert and novice physical therapists was 0.92 (95% CI = 0.88-0.95). The intrarater ICC of novice physical therapist was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.86-0.94).ConclusionThe Thai version of the screening tool for patients with lumbar instability achieved excellent content validity and interrater and intrarater reliability. This screening tool is recommended for use with Thai patients with low back pain to identify the subpopulation with lumbar instability.     

Investigating the Efficacy of Web-Based Transfer Training on Independent Wheelchair Transfers Through Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives

To determine the efficacy of a web-based transfer training module at improving transfer technique across 3 groups: web-based training, in-person training (current standard of practice), and a waitlist control group (WLCG); and secondarily, to determine subject factors that can be used to predict improvements in transfer ability after training.

Reliability of the seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users

PURPOSE: To evaluate the test-retest and interrater reliability of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 1.0 (SPCMA 1.0).METHOD: The participants were evaluated first by two raters and then, 3 weeks later, by one rater. Section 1 (one item, seven-point scale) evaluates the adult's overall ability to control its posture in a sitting position. Sections 2 and 3 (22 items each, scored on a seven-point scale), evaluate the adult's postural alignment in a static position and the changes in postural alignment induced by a dynamic activity.RESULTS: For the test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of section 1 was excellent (0.95) and moderate to good for sections 2 and 3 (0.60 - 0.62) and their subsections (0.47 - 0.78). For interrater reliability, the three sections had good to excellent ICCs (0.68 - 0.93) and their subsections had moderate to good ICCs (0.41 - 0.69). A large range was observed in Kappa coefficients (test-retest and interrater reliability) for the item analysis of the sections 2 and 3, due to a lack of variability in some items.CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that the SPCMA is reliable as a whole. Suitable information has been obtained for the development of the SPCMA 2.0 and, although further psychometric testing is needed, the latter should improve clinical evaluation of seated postural control in adult wheelchair users.     

Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test among Healthy Adults

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the active knee extension (AKE) test among healthy adults. [Subjects] Fourteen healthy participants (10 men and 4 women) volunteered and gave informed consent. [Methods] Two raters conducted AKE tests independently with the aid of a simple and inexpensive stabilizing apparatus. Each knee was measured twice, and the AKE test was repeated one week later. [Results] The interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_2,1) were 0.87 for the dominant knee and 0.81 for the nondominant knee. In addition, the intrarater (test-retest) reliability ICC_3,1 values range between 0.78–0.97 and 0.75–0.84 for raters 1 and 2 respectively. The percentages of agreement within 10° for AKE measurements were 93% for the dominant knee and 79% for the nondominant knee. [Conclusion] The finding suggests the current AKE test showed excellent interrater and intrarater reliability for assessing hamstring flexibility in healthy adults.Key words: Hamstring, Flexibility, Range of movement     

INTRA‐ AND INTER‐RATER RELIABILITY OF THE SELECTIVE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT (SFMA)

Purpose/Background:

The Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) is a clinical assessment system designed to identify musculoskeletal dysfunction by evaluation of fundamental movements for limitations or symptom provocation. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra‐ and inter‐rater reliability of the ten fundamental movement patterns of the SFMA in a healthy population using the SFMA categorical and criterion checklist scoring tools.

Methods:

35 healthy subjects (22.9 years +/− 1.9) were recorded with two digital video cameras (1‐frontal view/1‐sagittal view) while they performed the ten fundamental movements patterns that comprise the SFMA. Evaluators with varying experience with the SFMA (rater A, > 100 hours; rater B, 25 hours; and rater C, 16 hours) and not present at the initial data collection evaluated each video using categorical and criterion checklist scoring tools. Evaluators repeated this process at least one week later. The evaluators'' composite results were compared between and within raters using the kappa coefficient and ICC''s for categorical scoring and criterion checklist scoring, respectively.

Results

Substantial to almost perfect intra‐rater reliability of the SFMA (kappa, % agreement) was observed for all raters using the categorical scoring tool (rater A: .83, .91; rater B: .78, .88; and rater C: .72, .85). The criterion checklist scoring tool yielded intra‐rater ICCs (3,1; 95% confidence interval) ranging from good to poor with rater A demonstrating the highest reliability (ICC [SEM]) (.52 [2.36]) and rater C the lowest reliability (.26 [3.42]). Inter‐rater reliability of the categorical scoring tool was slight to substantial (.41‐.61, .69‐.79) while the criterion checklist tool (ICC 2,1) demonstrated unacceptable inter‐rater reliability when assessed in all raters together (.43 [2.7]).

Conclusions

As hypothesized, intra‐and inter‐rater reliability of categorical scoring and criterion checklist scoring of the ten fundamental movements of the SFMA was higher in raters with greater experience.     

Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with knee extensor poststroke spasticity

Muscle spasticity is a common motor disorder following upper motor neuron syndrome. A reliable and valid clinical tool is essential to document the effect of therapeutic interventions aimed to improve function by reducing spasticity. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is the most widely used and accepted clinical scale of spasticity. The MAS has been recently modified. The aim of this investigation was to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of clinical test of knee extensor post-stroke spasticity graded on a Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS). Two raters scored the muscle spasticity of 15 patients with ischaemic stroke. For the inter- and intrarater reliability, two raters agreed on 80.1% and 86.6%, respectively. The Kappa values were good (κ=0.72, SE=0.14, p<0.001) between raters and very good (κ=0.82, SE=0.12, p<0.001) within one rater. The values of Kendall tau-b correlation were acceptable for clinical use with 0.87 (SE=0.06, p<0.001) between raters and 0.92 (SE=0.05, p<0.001) within one rater. The MMAS demonstrated reliable measurements for a single rater and between raters for measuring knee extensor post-stroke spasticity. The results encourage further study on the reliability and the validity of the scale.     

Influence of Standardized Procedures on the Reliability of Hip Clinical Assessment

ObjectiveThis study evaluated a standardized and personalized approach to verify the effects of conditions on intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable difference for provocative tests and range-of-motion (ROM) tests used in hip pain assessment: flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR), flexion-abduction-external rotation-extension (FABER), and hip internal rotation with 90° of hip flexion (hip IR).MethodsNineteen participants (mean [± SD] age = 24 ± 2 years; 10 women and 9 men) without lower limb or back pain were recruited. Three raters evaluated each participant during 2 testing sessions, 1 day apart. Raters performed the 3 tests in 4 conditions: classic (C), controlled pressure duration (CPD), subject-specific position (SSP), and mixed (M = CPD + SSP).ResultsFor intrarater reliability, the CPD condition showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; mean and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for hip IR_ROM (0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94) and FADIR_ROM (0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89). The SSP condition showed the highest ICCs for FABER_height (0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-0.87) and FABER_ROM (0.62; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83). Concerning interrater reliability, the classic condition presented the highest ICCs for FABER variables (height: 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28-0.76; ROM: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.32-0.79) and hip IR ROM (0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87). The CPD condition showed the highest ICC for FADIR_ROM (0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-0.78).ConclusionIn the conditions of this study, CPD showed the highest ICCs for hip IR_ROM and FADIR_ROM, and SSP showed the highest ICCs for FABER_height and FABER_ROM.