Effectiveness of palliative care interventions offering social support to people with life‐limiting illness—A systematic review

Individuals managing the challenges of life‐limiting illness require adequate social support to maintain quality of life. Qualitative research reports that patients value highly the social support obtained in palliative care interventions such as day care and group therapies. This systematic review aims to summarise existing quantitative evidence on palliative care interventions that facilitate social support. Research literature was systematically searched using electronic databases and key journals. Searches returned a total of 6,247 unique titles of which sixteen were eligible for inclusion. Interventions include group therapies, group practical interventions and palliative day care. Outcome measures and study designs were heterogeneous. Only one study used a validated outcome measure of social support. Benefits were influenced by participant characteristics such as baseline distress. Partial economic evaluation was attempted by two studies. Methodological challenges include attrition and use of outcome measures that were insensitive to change. Statistically significant results were reported in psychological and physical domains. Evidence is limited due to methodological issues and a scarcity of quantitative research, particularly regarding long‐term benefits and cost‐effectiveness. Interventions may be more beneficial to some groups than others.     

Impact of opening an acute palliative care unit on administrative outcomes for a general oncology ward

BACKGROUND.

Acute palliative care units (APCUs) are gaining popularity in tertiary care centers. In this study, the authors examined the impact of opening an APCU on administrative outcomes for a general oncology ward (GOW) at a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS.

The GOW database was reviewed for 3 periods: June 2000 through May 2002 (before the APCU opened), June 2002 through May 2004 (transitional period, including APCU opening in a temporary location), and June 2004 through May 2006 (after opening of the APCU). Data were extracted on demographics, reasons for admission, admission type, waiting time for admission, length of stay (LOS), overstay (>2 days over expected LOS), death rate, and discharge destination. Linear regression analysis and the Cochran‐Armitage test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS.

There were 5340 admissions: The median patient age was 60 years, and 55% of patients were women. The most common primary cancers were head and neck (22%), gynecologic (21%), gastrointestinal (13%), and lung (12%). There were significant trends on the GOW in decreased admissions for palliative care (12.2%, 9.6%, and 7.9%, respectively, for the 3 periods; P < .0001), fewer inpatient deaths (11.4%, 8.6%, and 6.1%, respectively; P < .0001), and fewer patients with prolonged waits for a bed on a palliative care unit (3.4%, 3%, and 1.7%, respectively; P = .002). Admissions increased for interventions (10.4%, 17.3%, and 22.5%, respectively, for the 3 periods; P < .0001) and for chemotherapy (6.8%, 6.6%, and 9.7%, respectively; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS.

After the opening of an APCU at the authors' cancer center, the GOW experienced a decrease in administrative endpoints related to palliative and end‐of‐life care and an increase in endpoints related to cancer‐directed interventions. Prospective studies with clinical endpoints will be required to determine whether this specialization of inpatient care improves quality of life, quality of death, and psychosocial well being. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.     

Development and initial validation of a family appraisal of caregiving questionnaire for palliative care

This article describes the derivation and initial psychometric validation of a multi-dimensional Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire for Palliative Care (FACQ-PC). The 25-item measure consists of four theoretically derived subscales: (i) caregiver strain, (ii) positive caregiving appraisals, (iii) caregiver distress, and (iv) family well-being. Based on a sample of 160 family caregivers of a relative with cancer receiving palliative care, reliability analyses demonstrated the subscale scores to be internally consistent and factor analysis revealed evidence of factorial validity. Correlations of the four subscales with measures of family functioning, positive and negative affect, and subjective burden provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. The FACQ-PC provides a measure of the family's appraisal of caregiving that can be used in clinical assessment, and has potential utility for evaluating the effectiveness of palliative care interventions.     

Value of religious care for relief of psycho‐existential suffering in Japanese terminally ill cancer patients: the perspective of bereaved family members

Objective: This study aimed to clarify the experience of bereaved family members of cancer patients regarding the usefulness of religious care (perceived usefulness). The value of this care to palliate psycho‐existential suffering in future patients was also examined (predicted usefulness). Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 592 bereaved family members of cancer patients who were admitted to certified palliative care units in Japan. Responses were obtained from 378 families, indicating whether the patient received religious care, the perceived usefulness of the care, and its predicted usefulness for palliation of psycho‐existential suffering. Results: About 25% (N=83) indicated that the patient had received religious care, whereas 75% (N=255) had not received it. Families of patients who had received religious care evaluated pastoral care workers (86%), religious services (82%), and religious music (80%) as ‘very useful’ or ‘useful’. Families predicted usefulness of religious care for future patients: attending a religious service (very useful or useful, 56%; not useful or harmful, 44%), a religious atmosphere (48%, 52%), meeting with a pastoral care worker (50%, 50%), and religious care by physicians (26%, 74%), and nurses (27%, 73%). Families with a religion were significantly more likely to rate religious care as useful for future patients. Conclusions: Families of patients who received religious care generally evaluated this care to be very useful or useful. For future patients, some families felt that religious care would be useful, but some did not. In Japan, religious care is more likely to provide benefits to patients who have a religion. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.