Treatment of humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (acute humoral rejection [AHR]) of organ allografts presents most of the time as severe dysfunction with a high risk of allograft loss. Peritubular capillary complement C4d deposition is diagnostic of AHR in kidney allografts and is associated with circulating donor-specific anti-HLA alloantibodies. Removal of alloantibodies with suppression of antibody production and rejection reversal is now possible. Therapeutic strategies that include combinations of plasmapheresis (or immunoadsorption), mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and/or intravenous immunoglobulins have been used to successfully treat AHR. The optimal protocol to treat humoral rejection remains to be defined. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy (rituximab) aiming at depleting B cells and suppressing antibody production has been used as a rescue therapy in some episodes of refractory humoral rejection. Plasmapheresis and/or intravenous polyclonal immunoglobulin, as well as rituximab, have also been used to successfully “desensitize” selected high-immunologic risk patients who were in anticipation of crossmatch-positive (or ABO-incompatible) kidney transplantation. Recent data suggest that chronic kidney allograft rejection might also be monitored by complement C4d in biopsies. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (or enteric-coated mycophenolic acid), sirolimus, or everolimus in controlling antidonor humoral responses in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction remains to be studied prospectively. The combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil appears to effectively suppress antidonor antibody production. In the near future, the possible role of specific anti–B-cell approaches with drugs, such as rituximab, or possibly of new anti–T-cell activation approaches using selective agents such as belatacept should be assessed to refine the management of chronic allograft dysfunction.     

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil on donor-specific antibody formation in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a routinely used immunosuppressive agent that selectively blocks T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of this drug on human leukocyte(HLA) antibody production in general and donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation in particular in 154 recipients of renal allografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Renal allograft recipients were subdivided into three groups. Group 1 patients (n = 60) had received MMF since transplantation in combination with either cyclosporin A or tacrolimus and steroids. Group 2 patients (n = 29) had received an MMF-free immunosuppressive regimen initially followed by addition of MMF some time later. Group 3 patients (n = 65) had received no MMF. Cyclosporin A or tacrolimus in combination with azathioprine and/or steroids were used for immunosuppression. DSA were demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of panel-reactive antibodies of HLA class I and II specificity. RESULTS: The HLA antibodies were found in 16.7%, 27.6% and 30.8% of transplant recipients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. DSA were found in 8.3%, 17.2% and 20.0%, and non-DSA in 10.0%, 20.7% and 24.6%, of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MMF reduces anti-HLA class I and II antibody production and consequently DSA production in renal allograft recipients. Our data indicate this effect to be more pronounced in patients given MMF immediately after transplantation than in those in whom MMF is introduced some time later. The presence of DSA in the serum of renal allograft recipients is associated with poorer graft function (higher serum creatinine and more rejection episodes).     

Daclizumab induction as an immunosuppressive regimen for renal transplant recipients from non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the efficacy of interleukin-2-receptor blockers in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection. The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that the use of daclizumab induction (DAC) plus low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid diminishes the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) in renal transplants from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD). METHODS: We compared the incidence of DGF and rejection in 185 renal transplants from NHBD treated as follows: Group-I: quadruple sequential therapy with antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids (n=22); Group-II: cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/d) plus azathioprine plus steroid (n=26); Group-III: low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/d) plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=68); Group-IV: low-dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/d) plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=17); and Group-V: DAC plus low-dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid (n=43). RESULTS: The incidences of DGF were 72.7% in Group-I, 73.1% in Group-II, 69.1% in Group-III, 76.5% in Group-IV, and 44.2% in Group-V. Acute rejection was higher in Group-IV. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DAC, low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids is effective in lowering the incidence of DSF in NHBD kidney transplant recipients without any increase in acute rejection.     

Chronic humoral rejection: identification of antibody-mediated chronic renal allograft rejection by C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries

The pathogenesis of chronic renal allograft rejection (CR) remains obscure. The hypothesis that a subset of CR is mediated by antidonor antibody was tested by determining whether C4d is deposited in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and whether it correlates with circulating antidonor antibodies. All cases (from January 1, 1990, to July 31, 1999) that met histologic criteria for CR and had frozen tissue (28 biopsies, 10 nephrectomies) were included. Controls were renal allograft biopsies with chronic cyclosporine toxicity (n = 21) or nonspecific interstitial fibrosis (n = 10), and native kidneys with end-stage renal disease (n = 10) or chronic interstitial fibrosis (n = 5). Frozen sections were stained by two-color immunofluorescence for C4d, type IV collagen and Ulex europaeus agglutinin I. Antidonor HLA antibody was sought by panel-reactive antibody analysis and/or donor cross matching in sera within 7 wk of biopsy. Overall, 23 of 38 CR cases (61%) had PTC staining for C4d, compared with 1 of 46 (2%) of controls (P < 0.001). C4d in PTC was localized at the interface of endothelium and basement membrane. Most of the C4d-positive CR tested had antidonor HLA antibody (15 of 17; 88%); none of the C4d-negative CR tested (0 of 8) had antidonor antibody (P < 0.0002). The histology of C4d-positive CR was similar to C4d-negative CR, and 1-yr graft survival rates were 62% and 25%, respectively (P = 0.05). Since August 1998, five of six C4d-positive CR cases have been treated with mycophenolate mofetil +/- tacrolimus with a 100% 1-yr graft survival, versus 40% before August 1998 (P < 0.03). These data support the hypothesis that a substantial fraction of CR is mediated by antibody (immunologically active). C4d can be used to separate this group of CR from the nonspecific category of chronic allograft nephropathy and may have the potential to guide successful therapeutic intervention.     

Treatment of early mixed cellular and humoral renal allograft rejection with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

This prospective study investigated the efficiency of the tacrolimus (Tac) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) alone without immunoadsorption (IA) or plasmapheresis (PPH) as treatment for early (within 2 weeks) acute humoral rejection (AHR) in non-sensitized renal allograft recipients. Of 160 patients enrolled in this prospective study, 11 patients had histologically and clinically confirmed early steroid-resistant acute rejection with an antibody response and received Tac-MMF therapy. No other aggressive rescue methods such as IA, PPH were used, according to the study design. Patients (n=11) were followed for 13.8+/-3.5 months; nine were females. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative before transplantation in all patients and only positive for panel-reactive antibody in one patient. Most of the rejection episodes were mixed with cellular rejection (four patients met Banff IIA criteria, five patients met Banff IIB, one patient met Banff IB, and one patient met Banff borderline). After 16.19+/-6.16 days of treatment, all rejection episodes were successfully reversed and all graft functions were stable, with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.12+/-0.32 mg/dl during follow-up. No patient suffered from severe infectious complications (except one case of urinary infection). Our investigation suggests that Tac combined with MMF alone is adequate to reverse early mixed cellular and humoral C4d-positive rejection in non-sensitized renal allograft recipients.     

Humoral immune response after kidney transplantation is enhanced by acute rejection and urological obstruction and is down-regulated by mycophenolate mofetil treatment

The anti-allograft immune response may have a cellular and a humoral component. Lymphocytotoxic antibodies (Ab) and anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) Ab present before kidney transplantation carry an enhanced risk of acute rejection. Current immunosuppressive drugs act predominantly upon the cellular immune pathway which may leave unopposed the humoral mechanisms of anti-allograft response. We studied the production of lymphocytotoxic Ab and anti-HLA Ab after kidney transplantation under different drug therapies. Two hundred and sixty-four consecutive kidney transplant recipients treated with different immunosuppressive drugs, either stable and or with previous acute rejection or acute urologic obstruction, entered this study. Lymphocytotoxic Ab and anti-HLA Ab were evaluated by complement-dependent cytotoxicity and by ELISA. Ab donor-specificity was determined by flow cytometry. Both lymphocytotoxic Ab and anti-HLA Ab were significantly increased in acute rejection whatever the immunosuppressive regimen and almost significantly in urologic obstruction treated with azathioprine (AZA) groups. The presence of antidonor-specific Ab was associated with a significantly higher rate of graft loss. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy significantly down-regulated Ab synthesis in all patients groups when compared with AZA. The development of humoral antidonor response post-transplantation is associated with a dismal graft prognosis. This is the first report that acute urologic obstruction may be followed by unspecific lymphocytotoxic and anti-HLA Ab synthesis, surmising that a protracted obstruction may promote renal fibrosis through antibody mediation. The significant down-regulation of the humoral response by MMF when compared with AZA may herald a lower risk to mount a chronic rejection process.     

Novel rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants. METHODOLOGY: Six of 185 cadaveric renal allograft recipients transplanted at our institute developed AHR over a mean period of 4.8 +/- 0.8 d after operation. The ages ranged from 35 to 51 yr (mean 42.6 +/- 5.6 yr). C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and accumulation of granulocytes in PTC were observed. IA with staphylococcal protein A and TAC-MMF combination therapy were given. RESULTS: After subjected to IA for 6.3 +/- 1.03 sessions combined with TAC (0.14-0.16 mg/kg/d) and MMF (1.5 g/d) therapy, renal function recovered in all the patients. The mean duration of treatment when serum creatinine decreased was 14 +/- 2.9 d. The pre-IA panel reactive antibody reactivity was as high as 50.2 +/- 6.1%, and was significantly reduced to 8.3 +/- 2.9% after IA. Repeated allograft kidney biopsy in four of six patients revealed a favorable remission of AHR. With a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 5.46 months, patient and allograft survival are 100%, renal function remained stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 +/- 0.22 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment for alloantibody-mediated AHR remains undefined. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining IA and TAC-MMF rescue has excellence to improve the outcome of AHR.     

Campath-1H in renal transplantation: The University of Wisconsin experience

BACKGROUND: Immune cell depletion is known to prevent renal allograft rejection and injury. We evaluated the humanized monoclonal antibody Campath-1H (alemtuzumab; ILEX Oncology, San Antonio, Texas) in renal transplant recipients for its safety and efficacy in preventing rejection when used in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose steroid therapy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive renal allograft recipients received 2 doses of Campath-1H antibody on days 0 and 1. Outcomes were compared to patients who received an anti-CD25 antibody (n=799), Thymoglobulin (n=160), or other antibody treatment (n=156) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and higher dose steroids. RESULTS: The Campath-1H group overall experienced less rejection than the other 3 groups (P=.037). Patients with delayed graft function experienced less rejection with Campath-1H than control groups (P=.0096) and improved graft survival (P=.0119). There was no difference in infection or malignancies between the 4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Campath-1H was well tolerated in renal transplant patients and led to significant reductions in incidence of rejection. Patients with delayed graft function experienced significantly improved graft survival.     

De novo anti-HLA antibodies in renal allograft recipients: a cross-section study

Background

The occurrence of anti-HLA antibodies plays a well established role in solid organ rejection. The development of x-MAP multiple bead technology (Luminex) has enabled more accurate detection and definition of these alloantibodies.

Methods

In 267 kidney transplant patients with stable allograft function for ≥3 years, we analyzed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies by Luminex technology. These patients had no alloantibodies before transplantation, and the immunosuppression treatment was: tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, everolimus, and/or sirolimus.

Results

Fifteen of the 267 patients showed anti-HLA class I antibodies and 12 showed anti-HLA class II antibodies, Seven patients had donor-specific antibodies (DSA): 1 anti-HLA class I, 5 anti-HLA class II, and 1 with both classes. No differences were found between DSA and the use or not of any specific therapy. However, in the retrospective review, we found a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes in the immediate posttransplant period among patients who developed class II DSA than those without DSA.

Conclusions

The prevalence of patients with normal renal function who develop DSA beyond 3 years after transplantation was relatively low. Steroid or withdrawal replacement of calcineurin inhibitors with inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin seem to not be risk factors to increase the development of DSA. The finding that patients who developed DSA showed a higher rate of previous acute rejection episodes suggested that they should be monitored more frequently for HLA antibodies.     

心脏移植后存活时间超过10年者的临床分析

目的 总结单中心13例心脏移植后存活超过10年受者的治疗及随访情况.方法 13例受者在1995年8月至2001年6月期间接受心脏移植,前8例受者采用环孢素A+硫唑嘌呤+皮质激素的经典免疫抑制方案,后5例在该方案基础上进行了免疫诱导,有6例在吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)上市后将硫唑嘌呤替换为MMF.围手术期对主要并发症及时进行防治,术后对受者进行定期随访,建立个人长期随访档案,监测急性排斥反应(AR)和移植物血管病(CAV)发生情况,采用生存质量调查表分析生活状况.结果 13例存活超过10年的受者占同期心脏移植总例数的48.1%(13/27),术后受者心理状态较好,生存质量良好,均能够正常的学习、生活及工作.术后近期(1年内)发生的并发症包括AR 3例、感染4例、肾功能不全3例、移植物右心功能不全5例、移植后新发糖尿病2例及肝功能不全5例,经对症治疗后均好转;术后远期(1年后)发生的并发症包括CAV 2例、AR 4例、高胆固醇血症5例、高血压病4例、高尿酸血症10例及慢性肾功能损害3例等.1例受者于移植后13年因并发肝癌死亡.结论 心脏移植受者长期存活与其心理状态、经济条件、依从性及良好的随访制度等密切相关,并受社会因素的影响.

Abstract：

Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical management and follow-up of 13 recipients with survival of over ten years after cardiac transplantation. Methods Thirteen male recipients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between August 1995 and June 2001 in our center and received standard immunosuppressive therapy protocols (8 cases) or induction therapy protocols (5 cases). Cyclosporine, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone were applied as maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. Six recipients switched from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil when mycophenolate mofetil was available. Perioperative complications were prevented and treated. After operation, the recipients were followed up regularly to set up personnel long-term follow-up files. The incidence of acute rejection (AR) and (cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was monitored. Results The 13 survived recipients accounted for 48. 1 % of the total number in the corresponding period (13/27). All survivals recovered well and had a good quality of life. The recent (1 year) complications included acute allograft rejection (3 cases), infection (4 cases), renal insufficiency (3 cases), allograft right ventricular dysfunction (5 cases), post-transplant diabetes (2 cases) and liver dysfunction (5 cases). The long-term (1 year later) complications included acute allograft rejection (2 cases), CAV (2 cases), hypercholesterolemia (5 cases), hypertension (4 cases), hyperuricemia (10 cases) and chronic renal impairment (3 cases). One hepatitis B virus carrier died of liver cancer 13 years after transplantation. Conclusion The long-term survival of cardiac allograft recipients is closely associated with psychological state, financial condition, compliance and follow-up medical system, while the sociological and environmental factors may play important roles.     

Improvement of renal function in pediatric heart transplant recipients treated with low-dose calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a major complication in heart transplant recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. The goal of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage with the concomitant introduction of mycophenolate mofetil on both renal function and cardiac allograft function. METHODS: Fourteen of 52 consecutive pediatric cardiac allograft recipients experienced a progressive decrease of renal function. A renal biopsy was performed before the dose of calcineurin inhibitors was reduced by 50% and azathioprine was replaced by mycophenolate mofetil. Renal function was evaluated by inulin clearance and maximal urinary osmolality before and yearly after the therapeutic changes. Acute rejection was monitored clinically, by echocardiography and endomyocardial biopsies. RESULTS: Inulin clearance in the fourteen children decreased from 84.2 mL/min/1.73 m at one year posttransplantation to 46.5+/-9.6 mL/min/1.73 m at the time of the change in immunosuppressive therapy. Significant renal lesions were observed in the renal biopsies performed before the change. At 1 year, inulin clearance had increased by 67%. In six patients who had a second determination 2 years after the switch, inulin clearance was not significantly different from the value at 1 year. There were three reversible acute rejection episodes in three patients. The incidence of rejection episodes was not different from a control group of patients whose treatment was not changed. CONCLUSION: The reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dosage and replacement of azathioprine by mycophenolate mofetil is a safe way to improve renal function in children with heart transplants and calcineurin inhibitor induced nephrotoxicity.     

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants. METHODS: Six of 185 cadaveric renal allograft recipients developed AHR at a mean of 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after the operation. C4d deposits were observed in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with accumulation of granulocytes. IA with staphylococcal protein A and FK506-MMF combination therapy were administered. RESULTS: After treatment with IA for 6.3 +/- 1.03 sessions combined with FK506 (0.14 to 0.16 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) and MMF (1.5 g/d) therapy, renal function recovered in all the patients. The mean duration of treatment to a serum creatinine decrease was 14 +/- 2.9 days. The pre-IA panel reactive antibody reactivity (PRA) peaked at 50.2% +/- 6.1%, and was significantly reduced to 8.3% +/- 2.9% after IA. In four of six patients repeat allograft biopsy revealed a remission of AHR. With a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 5.46 months, patient and allograft survival are 100% and renal function remains stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 +/- 0.22 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment for alloantibody-mediated AHR remains uncertain. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining IA and FK506-MMF rescue improves the outcome of AHR.     

肾移植术后急性体液性排斥反应的治疗

目的 总结肾移植术后急性体液性排斥反应中针对HLA抗体的检测和处理经验.方法 肾移植受者15例,术前行HLA分型、交叉配型和群体反应性抗体(PRA)的检测,术后采用他克莫司(或环孢素A)、霉酚酸酯和糖皮质激素预防排斥反应.15例于肾移植后1～14 d发生抗体介导的急性排斥反应(AMR),采用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(100 mg/d,使用5 d)治疗,或将环孢素A转换为他克莫司,当PRA明显升高,且血清中出现供者特异性HLA抗体时,即行血浆置换(PP),共行1～5次,每次PP后静脉输注免疫球蛋白(IVIG)100～150 mg/kg,最后1次PP后给予WIG 200～500mg/kg.结果 术后出现抗供者特异性HLA Ⅰ类抗体者9例,抗HLAⅡ类抗体者4例,同时出现抗Ⅰ、Ⅱ类抗体者2例.14例的AMR逆转,1例术后发生移植肾功能恢复延迟,彩色多普勒超声波显示移植肾血流灌注差,于术后第10天切除移植肾.并行二行肾移植.2例AMR后并发急性肾小管坏死,透析后移植肾功能恢复正常.抗排斥反应治疗期间患者均未发生严重感染.随访12～52个月,1例因慢性移植肾肾病恢复血液透析治疗,1例死于心血管疾病,其余患者移植肾功能稳定.结论 将ATG、PP和IVIG联合应用能有效逆转AMR.     

Rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC; 0.14 to 0.16 mg/kg/d) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 1.5 to 2.0 g/d) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection in nine cadaveric renal allograft recipients. Initial Panel reactive antibody (PRA-I and PRA-II levels were as high as 28.8% ± 16.2% and 15.3% ± 8.9%, IA therapy significantly decreased PRA-I and PRA-II levels to 5.9% ± 2.9% and 2.2% ± 0.6%, respectively. Total serum immunoglobulin levels were markedly decreased. Repeated allograft renal biopsy in nine patients revealed remission of acute humoral rejection (AHR), and the deposition of C4d disappeared and reduced. With a mean follow-up of 29.4 ± 5.4 months, patient and allograft survivals were 100%, and renal function remained stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.1 ± 0.3 mg/dL. Our findings suggested that a therapeutic approach combining IA and TAC and MMF rescue improved the outcomes of AHR.     

Ultra-Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection 30 Years After a Living-Related Renal Allograft

Antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection has become increasingly recognized and more clearly defined through the use of flow cytometry cross-matching and the deposition of C4d in renal allograft biopsies. All of the cases reported thus far have developed an antibody within 10 years of transplantation, and many lacked HLA and/or donor specificity. The present patient developed an anti-HLA donor-specific antibody between the 22nd and 30th year after a living-related renal transplant. At the 30th year post-transplantation, she experienced a rise in the serum creatinine from 0.7 to 1.9 mg/dL associated with transplant biopsy C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries and glomeruli. After the replacement of azathioprine with mycophenolate mofetil, and six apheresis treatments followed by two infusions of IVIG, the renal function stabilized at 1.9 mg/dL, 33 years after transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection must be considered as a possible cause or renal allograft dysfunction at all time periods after transplantation.     

Development of posttransplant antidonor HLA antibodies is associated with acute humoral rejection and early graft dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine whether the production of posttransplant antibodies directed against donor HLA mismatches (donor specific antibody; DSA) is associated with renal allograft rejection and early graft dysfunction. METHODS: Forty-nine adult renal allograft recipients with increased risk of rejection were enrolled during the period of October 2001 through May 2003 and were prospectively monitored for the development of anti-HLA antibodies. RESULTS: Of 49 patients, eight (16.3 %) patients were diagnosed with acute humoral rejection (AHR) and 11/49 (22.4%) patients were diagnosed with acute cellular rejection (ACR). A strong association between pretransplant HLA sensitization and AHR was found (P=0.005). Of the eight patients diagnosed with AHR, the majority developed DSA before or concomitant with episodes of rejection (P<0.001). Only 3 of 41 patients (7.3%) without AHR developed DSA. The pathogenic role of alloantibodies was further substantiated by analyzing their association with graft function as measured by serum creatinine levels. The average serum creatinine after the third month posttransplantation in DSA producers was 2.24+/-1.01 mg/dL, while in non-DSA patients the average serum creatinine was 1.41+/-0.37 mg/dL (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study reveals a strong association between the production of DSA, AHR, and early graft dysfunction. Our findings indicate that prospective monitoring for anti-HLA antibodies following transplantation is a useful test for the diagnosis and classification of AHR for identifying patients at risk of early graft dysfunction.     

Significance of HLA-matching and anti-HLA antibodies in heart transplant patients receiving induction therapy?

ObjectivesThough Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching benefits are demonstrated in renal transplantation, evidence in heart transplantation is lacking, and its clinical feasibility is uncertain. Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies are being increasingly studied in organ transplantation, with diverging conclusions between transplantated organs.MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the influence of HLA matching and anti-HLA antibodies on overall survival, acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy in 309 patients receiving induction therapy and triple-drug immunosuppression.ResultsThe average number of HLA-A/B/DR mismatches between donor and recipient was 4.9 ± 1. The majority of mismatches was for Class I HLA-A/B with an average of 3.3, then for Class I HLA-DR with an average of 1.6. Overall, the HLA-A/-B/-DR mismatches had no influence on the cardiac allograft survival (p = 0.28). However, HLA-DR mismatches were negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection (p = 0.04). Our analysis found anti-HLA antibodies in 27% of recipients, de novo anti-HLA antibodies in 16% of recipients, and donor-specific anti-HLA (DSA) antibodies in 8% of recipients. Furthermore, de novo DSA had no influence on the 5-year survival (78% with DSA vs. 92% without DSA; p = 0.49), which may be masked by the limited number of recipients in analysis By univariable analysis, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on severe cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy.ConclusionsHLA-DR mismatch was negatively correlated to severe cellular and/or humoral allograft rejection but had no influence on cardiac allograft survival. In this study, anti-HLA antibodies (preexisting or de novo) unrelated or related to the donor had no influence on cellular and/or humoral rejection or on chronic allograft vasculopathy. The results of this study add to the controversy on the impact of allo-antibodies in heart transplant recipients receiving induction therapy and contemporary immunosuppression.     

Therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by acute graft dysfunction associated with de novo production of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) and C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of the renal allograft. It has been reported the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) as effective rescue therapy for established AHR. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, seven kidney allografts recipients suffered from AHR diagnosed by severe rejection and C4d staining in peritubular capillaries. All patients had a negative cross-match before renal transplantation. RESULTS: All patients were treated with daily sessions of PP and in four cases IVIG was added after the last PP session. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were employed as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In one case, rituximab was added to PP and IVIG owing to refractory humoral rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 100%, allograft survival was 70%, and the mean serum creatinine was 201 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: AHR is a severe form of rejection associated with a poor prognosis, but its early diagnosis and treatment with PP and IVIG allows reversal of AHR reaching a 70% graft survival at 1 year.     

Histological analysis of late renal allografts of antidonor antibody positive patients with C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries

Abstract:  The association of humoral immunity with late renal allograft dysfunction has recently been recognized, and many reports have revealed C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (C4d in PTC), and the presence of serum antidonor HLA antibody in patients suffering from graft dysfunction, long time after transplantation. In this study, morphological changes in renal allograft biopsies more than 1 year after transplantation in 14 patients with C4d in PTC and serum antidonor antibody were investigated for the presence of chronic rejection (CR). In addition to the light microscope study, an electron microscope study was done to evaluate the multilayering of the peritubular capillary basement membrane (MLPTC). Histologically, only seven of 14 patients met the criteria of CR, and 71.4% (5/7) of CR patients had episodes of acute humoral rejection (AHR), coexisting with acute tubulointerstitial rejection. Peritubular capillaritis was observed in all patients, although it differed in severity. Transplant glomerulitis and interstitial inflammation were also observed in many patients: 71.4% (10/14) and 92.9% (13/14) respectively. MLPTC was observed in 12 patients (85.7%), but the severity of the MLPTC did not reflect the severity of peritubular capillaritis or any other histological features. The long-term outcomes of the patients CR, especially those with episodes of AHR, were poor, and two of them lost their graft functions. On the other hand, patients without CR had relatively favourable outcomes. In conclusion, we confirmed the diverse morphological changes of late renal allografts, which cannot be categorized as chronic humoral rejection (CHR), and such patients who do not have typical morphological changes such as CHR, should be followed-up on a long-term basis in order to clarify the significance of C4d on PTC in late renal allografts.     

Triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation: single-center experience

AIM: In this single-center cohort, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in pediatric renal transplantation. METHODS: We examined the medical records of 22 consecutive renal transplantation recipients (12 boys, 10 girls) receiving tacrolimus, to evaluate occurrence of acute rejection (AR) episodes, glomerular filtration rates (GFR), and side effects. RESULTS: The mean recipient age was 15.07 +/- 3.96 years. Seven grafts came from cadaveric, and 15 from living related donors. The patients were placed on immunosuppression with prednisolone and tacrolimus plus azathioprine (n = 8) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 12) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (n = 2). Eighteen patients received basiliximab on days 0 and 4. There were three AR episodes at 5, 9, and 12 months. Mean GFR at the end of 1 and 2 years were 97.1 +/- 24.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 116.9 +/- 42.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. There was no graft loss. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia were present in 14 (63.6%), 3 (13.6%), and 3 (13.6%) patients, respectively, without gingival hyperplasia, tremor, or hypertrichosis. Supraventricular tachycardia was noticed in five patients (22.7%), three of whom needed antiarrhythmic drugs (13.6%). CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience with tacrolimus, steroid plus azathioprine or MMF or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium regimen in pediatric kidney recipients showed a low rate of AR with excellent graft survival and function at 1 and 2 year posttransplantation. The increased rate of supraventricular tachycardia in this regimen had not been previously reported; this association merits further studies.