Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Ten Year Follow-Up After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in the Early Days Forever Cured,or a Source for New Arrhythmias?

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is highly effective with a low complication rate. However, lesions created by RF energy are irreversible, inhomogeneous, and therefore potentially proarrhythmic. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the magnitude and importance of long-term proarrhythmic effects of RF energy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1995, 120 patients underwent RF ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Patient data were collected by contacting patients and/or filling out a questionnaire, and medical files were screened for recurrent, documented arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment, and repeated EP study. Referring cardiologists were asked about recurrences of tachyarrhythmias. Fourteen patients (11%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 10 years, six patients died. Recurrences of AVNRT were not any more observed after 3 years after ablation. A total of 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias, 6 from type 1 atrial flutter, 6 from atrial tachycardia, 9 from atrial fibrillation, and finally 16 from symptomatic premature atrial contractions (PACs), needing medical treatment or a combination of these arrhythmias. Nine patients underwent pacemaker implantation, 4 after developing procedural atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances, 2 after His ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation, 1 patient for sick sinus syndrome, and another 2 patients after developing late AV block, respectively, 7 and 9 years after ablation. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up after RF ablation for AVNRT, no AVNRT recurrences were observed, but 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias or late AV block. This potential proarrhythmic effect of RF energy promotes the application of alternative energy sources for ablative therapies for cardiac arrhythmias.     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Acute effects of simvastatin to terminate fast reentrant tachycardia through increasing wavelength of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit

Simvastatin (SV) leads to reduction of ventricular rhythm during atrial fibrillation on rabbit atrioventricular (AV) nodes. The aim of our study was (i) to determine the frequency‐dependent effects of SV in a functional model, and (ii) to assess the effects of SV to suppress experimental AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Selective stimulation protocols were used with two different pacing protocols, His to atrial, and atrial to atrial (AA). An experimental AVNRT model with various cycle lengths was created in three groups of perfused rabbit AV nodal preparations (n = 24) including: SV 3 μm , SV 7 μm , and verapamil 0.1 μm . SV increased nodal conduction time and refractoriness by AA pacing. Different simulated models of slow/fast and fast/slow reentry were induced. SV caused inhibitory effects on the slow anterograde conduction (origin of refractoriness) more than on the fast anterograde conduction time, leading to an increase of tachycardia cycle length, tachycardia wavelength and termination of slow/fast reentrant tachyarrhythmia. Verapamil significantly suppressed the basic and frequency‐dependent intrinsic nodal properties. In addition, SV decreased the incidence of gap and echo beats. The present study showed that SV in a concentration and rate‐dependent manner increased the AV effective refractory period and reentrant tachycardia wavelength that lead to slowing or termination of experimental fast AVNRT. The direction‐dependent inhibitory effect of SV on the anterograde and retrograde dual pathways explains its specific antireentrant actions.     

房室结折返性心动过速时房室非同步兴奋的电生理机制

13倒房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）,其心动过速时表现为房室非同步兴奋,其中房室2：1传导11例,房室分离2例。房室非同步现象说明心房和心室并非AVNRT折返环路的必须部分。心房参与心动过速取决于结周心房组织的不应期,心室参与心动过速取决于希浦系统的不应期,由于心房组织的不应期通常较短,而希浦系统的不应用相对较长,因此非同步现象以房室阻滞或分离多见,室房阻滞或分离少见。正确识别AVNRT时房室非同步兴奋现象对于AVNRT的正确诊断及导管消融治疗有非常重要的意义。     

Double Ventricular Responses to a Single Atrial Depolarization in a Patient with Dual AV Nodal Pathways

Electrophysiological study was performed in a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Double ventricular responses through dual AV nodal pathways were observed by atrial extrastimulus technique followed by initiation of AVNRT. The difference in conduction time between the slow and fast AV nodal pathways was longer than 320 msec. A ventricular extrastimulus delivered during sinus rhythm, which was not followed by ventriculoatrial conduction, also induced AVNRT. These findings indicated the presence of an antegrade critical delay and retrograde block in the slow AV nodal pathway, criteria necessary for the occurrence of a double ventricular response.     

射频消融的延迟效应对手术效果及并发症的影响

目的 :探讨射频消融延迟效应对手术效果及并发症的影响。方法 :回顾分析 1998～ 2 0 0 2年住院的室上速 4例 ,年龄 15～ 4 5岁 ,男女各 2例 ,其中房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT) 2例 ,右侧显性预激 (B- WPW) 2例 ,射频消融均未成功 ,在消融过程中 2例 B- WPW出现短暂旁路前传消失 ,2例 AVNRT出现短暂快速交界性心律及一过性 度房室传导阻滞。结果 :2例 B- WPW术后 1个月复查心电图预激消失 ,2例 AVNRT分别于术后 3d和 1周出现持续 度房室传导阻滞和 度 型房室传导阻滞 ,经激素治疗后房室传导均恢复正常。所有患者术后均未再发作室上速。结论 :射频消融术后组织及电学损伤范围可进一步加大从而产生延迟现象 ,它可对患者有益也可产生不利影响 ,因此射频消融时要密切注意可能产生延迟反应的电生理现象。     

Analysis of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Variable Ventriculoatrial Block: Characteristics of the Upper Common Pathway

Background: The precise nature of the upper turnaround part of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not entirely understood.
Methods: In nine patients with AVNRT accompanied by variable ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction block, we examined the electrophysiologic characteristics of its upper common pathway.
Results: Tachycardia was induced by atrial burst and/or extrastimulus followed by atrial-His jump, and the earliest atrial electrogram was observed at the His bundle site in all patients. Twelve incidents of VA block: Wenckebach VA block (n = 7), 2:1 VA block (n = 4), and intermittent (n = 1) were observed. In two of seven Wenckebach VA block, the retrograde earliest atrial activation site shifted from the His bundle site to coronary sinus ostium just before VA block. Prolongation of His-His interval occurred during VA block in 11 of 12 incidents. After isoproterenol administration, 1:1 VA conduction resumed in all patients. Catheter ablation at the right inferoparaseptum eliminated antegrade slow pathway conduction and rendered AVNRT noninducible in all patients.
Conclusion: Selective elimination of the slow pathway conduction at the inferoparaseptal right atrium may suggest that the subatrial tissue linking the retrograde fast and antegrade slow pathways forms the upper common pathway in AVNRT with VA block.     

A Direct Midseptal Approach to Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Ablation

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe a midseptal approach to selective slow pathway ablation for the treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). In addition, predictors of success and recurrence were evaluated. Methods: Selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway utilizing radiofrequency (RF) energy and a midseptal approach was attempted in 60 consecutive patients with inducible AVNRT. Results: Successful slow pathway ablation or modification was achieved in 59 of 60 patients (98%) during a single procedure. One patient developed inadvertent complete AV block (1.6%). A mean of 2,7 ±1.4 RF applications were required with mean total procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopic times of 191± 6.3, 22.8 ± 2.3, and 28.2 ±1.8 minutes, respectively. The PR and AH intervals, as well as the antegrade and retrograde AV node block cycle length, were unchanged. However, the fast pathway effective refractory period was significantly shortened following ablation (354± 13 msec vs 298 ± 12 msec; P= 0.008). The A/V ratio at successful ablation sites were no different than those at unsuccessful sites (0.22 ± 0.04 vs 0.23± 0.03). Junctional tachycardia was observed during all successful and 60 of 122 (49%) unsuccessful RF applications (P < 0.0001). A residual AV nodal reentrant echo was present in 15 of 59 (25%) patients, During a mean follow-up of 20.1± 0.6 months (11.5–28 months) there were four recurrences (5%), 4 of 15 (27%) in patients with and none of 44 patients without residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.002). Conclusions: A direct midseptal approach to selective ablation of the slow pathway is a safe, efficacious, and efficient technique. Junctional tachycardia during RF energy application was a highly sensitive but not specific predictor of success and residual slow pathway conduction was associated with a high rate of recurrence.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with multiple AH jumps: electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation

This article describes the additional use of incremental atrial burst pacing (A1A1) and double atrial extrastimulation with a predefined fast pathway conducted A2 (A1A2A3), rather than single atrial extrastimulation (A1A2) only, to characterize typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The authors noted an additional 32% of patients had multiple anterograde AV nodal physiology demonstrated when A1A1 or A1A2A3 protocols were deployed compared to more conventional A1A2 protocols. The A2H2max (449 +/- 147 vs 339 +/- 94 ms) and A3H3max (481 +/- 120 vs 389 +/- 85 ms) were higher in 31 patients where multiple jumps in the AV nodal conduction curve were obtained (group 1) compared to 192 patients where only single jump was obtained (group 2) (both P < 0.01). Postablation, the degree of reduction of A2H2max (49%) and A3H3max (50%) in group 1 was greater than in group 2 (38% and 42%, respectively, P < 0.05). In seven of group 1 patients in whom A1A2A3 stimulation was required to reveal multiple jumps, the A2H2max remained unchanged after ablation (237 +/- 89 vs 214 +/- 59, P > 0.05). A3H3max was the only parameter that shortened significantly after ablation. Generally, successful ablation resulted in loss of multiple discontinuities in A1A1/A1H1 or A2A3/A3H3 curves. In conclusion, a combination of A1A2, A1A1, and A1A2A3 are required to fully elucidate AVNRT. Significant shortening of AHmax or loss of multiple jumps after ablation indicates successful elimination of AVNRT in these patients.     

Pacing Maneuver in the Diagnosis of the Mechanism of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pacing and entrainment maneuvers are essential for establishing the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), but may fail to do so if the SVT terminates or if pacing results in atrioventricular (AV) dissociation as opposed to entrainment of the arrhythmia. We present an unusual case of typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with high degree AV block in which the diagnosis was confirmed using a novel maneuver consisting of simultaneous atrial and ventricular (A + V) pacing. The reproducible response to A + V pacing at varying cycle lengths established the diagnosis of AVNRT in this case. (PACE 2011; 34:e90–e93)     

"V-H-A Pattern" as a criterion for the differential diagnosis of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia from AV reciprocating tachycardia

BACKGROUND: During ventricular extrastimulation, His bundle potential (H) following ventricular (V) and followed by atrial potentials (A), i.e., V-H-A, is observed in the His bundle electrogram when ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction occurs via the normal conduction system. We examined the diagnostic value of V-H-A for atypical form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), which showed the earliest atrial activation site at the posterior paraseptal region during the tachycardia. METHODS: We prospectively examined the response of VA conduction to ventricular extrastimulation during basic drive pacing performed during sinus rhythm in 16 patients with atypical AVNRT masquerading atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway and 21 with AVRT utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway. Long RP' tachycardia with RP'/RR > 0.5 was excluded. The incidences of V-H-A and dual AV nodal physiology (DP) were compared between atypical AVNRT and AVRT. RESULTS: V-H-A was demonstrated in all the 16 patients (100%) in atypical AVNRT and in only 1 of the 21 (5%) in AVRT (P < 0.001). DP was demonstrated in 10 patients (63%) in atypical AVNRT and in 4 (19%) in AVRT (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of V-H-A for atypical AVNRT was higher than that of DP (P < 0.05). Positive and negative predictive values were 94% and 100%, respectively, for V-H-A and 71% and 74%, respectively, for DP. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of V-H-A during ventricular extrastimulation is a simple criterion for differentiating atypical AVNRT masquerading AVRT from AVRT utilizing a posterior paraseptal accessory pathway.     

V-A block during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: reentry confined to the AV node

Retrograde block during atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia is considered a rare phenomenon that can potentially occur in the AV node or in the atrium. A patient with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and transient VA block localized in the AV node is presented. Pharmacological and stimulation maneuvers identified the site of block in the AV node and not in the atrium. Thus, AV nodal reentry can be confined to the AV node.     

Diagnostic Approach to Narrow Complex Tachycardia with VA Block

Narrow complex tachycardia with VA block is rare. The differential diagnosis usually consists of (1) junctional tachycardia (JT) with retrograde block: (2) AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with proximal common pathway block; and finally (3) nodofascicular tachycardia using the His-Purkinje system for antegrade conduction and a nodofascicular pathway for retrograde conduction. Analysis of tachycardia onset and termination, the effect of bundle branch block on tachycardia cycle length, and the response to atrial and ventricular premature depolarization must be carefully done. Making the correct diagnosis is crucial as the success rate in eliminating the tachycardia will depend on tachycardia mechanism.     

The different ablation effects on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with and without dual nodal pathways

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in adults have shown a significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) after successful slow pathway ablation. However, information on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the different effects of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in pediatric AVNRT patients between those with and without dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. METHODS: From January 1992 to August 2004, a total 67 pediatric patients with AVNRT underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation at our institution. We compared the electrophysiologic characteristics between those obtained before and after ablation in the children with AVNRT with and without dual AV nodal pathways. RESULTS: Dual AV nodal pathways were found in 37 (55%) of 67 children, including 36 (54%) with antegrade and 10 (15%) with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The antegrade and retrograde fast pathway ERPs in children with dual AV nodal pathways were both longer than the antegrade and retrograde ERPs in children without dual AV nodal pathways (300 +/- 68 vs 264 +/- 58 ms, P = 0.004; 415 +/- 70 vs 250 +/- 45 ms, P < 0.001) before ablation. In children with antegrade dual AV nodal pathways, the antegrade fast pathway ERP decreased from 300 +/- 68 ms to 258 +/- 62 ms (P = 0.008). The retrograde fast pathway ERP also decreased after successful ablation in the children with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways (415 +/- 70 vs. 358 +/- 72 ms, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The dual AV nodal physiology could not be commonly demonstrated in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT. After a successful slow pathway ablation, the fast pathway ERP shortened significantly in the children with dual AV nodal pathways.     

Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol for the induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and other supraventricular tachycardias

AIM: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing protocol (PRTCL) for induction of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and other supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs), compared to standard (STD) methods. METHODS: The study cohort of 121 patients (age 57.51 +/- 14.02 years) who presented with documented SVTs and/or symptoms of palpitations and dizziness, and underwent invasive electrophysiological evaluation was divided into Group I (AVNRT, n = 42) and Group II (Control, n = 79). The PRTCL involved a train of six atrial extrastimuli, delivered in a decremental ramp fashion. The STD methods included continuous burst and rapid incremental pacing up to atrioventricular (AV) block cycle length, and single and occasionally double atrial extrastimuli. Prolongation in the Atrio-Hisian (Delta-AH) intervals achieved by both methods were compared, as were induction frequencies. RESULTS: In Group I, three categories of responses--(1) induction of AVNRT, (2) induction of echo beats only, and (3) none--were observed in 29 (69%), 11 (26%), and 2 (5%) patients with the PRTCL, when compared with 14 (33%), 16 (38%), and 12 (29%) patients with STD methods in the baseline state without the use of pharmacological agents. The Delta-AH intervals for each of these three categories were larger using PRTCL versus STD methods; 293.3 +/- 95.2 ms versus 192.9 +/- 61.4 ms (P < 0.005), 308.6 +/- 68.5 ms versus 189. 9 +/- 64.9 ms (P < 0.0005), and 203.0 +/- 86.3 ms versus 145.8 +/- 58.9 ms (P = NS), respectively. In Group II, in one patient with dual AV nodal physiology but no clinical tachycardia, the PRTCL induced nonsustained (12 beats) AVNRT. Additionally, in this group, both PRTCL and STD methods induced atrial tachycardia in two patients and orthodromic AV re-entrant tachycardia in one patient. CONCLUSION: Decremental ramp atrial extrastimuli pacing PRTCL demonstrates a superior response for induction of typical AVNRT as compared to STD techniques. Because of easy and reliable induction of AVNRT and echo beats by the PRTCL, we recommend it as a method to increase the likelihood of induction of AVNRT. For induction of other SVTs, the PRTCL and the STD methods are comparable.     

A Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia with Different Initiation Patterns: What is the Mechanism?

A 47-year-old man with palpitations underwent electrophysiologic testing (EPS). Burst atrial pacing while infusing isoproterenol induced non-reproducible wide QRS tachycardias with an unusual pattern of an H-A-V activation with the same tachycardia cycle length and two different initiation patterns. The tachycardia had the earliest atrial activation at the His bundle region. No dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology was demonstrated by programmed atrial stimulation. Though a definite diagnosis of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was not obtained, slow pathway ablation was performed in order to avoid inadvertent AV block as a complication. Thereafter, no tachycardias were induced by repeat burst atrial pacing.     

One-to-Two Atrioventricular Conduction Causing Nonreentrant Tachycardia: Successful Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation

The anatomical substrate for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is well known and is due to anterograde conduction through a siow conducting pathway and retrograde conduction using a fast conducting path way. In this report, we describe a patient with AVNRT who also presented with frequent episodes of paroxysmal nonreentrant tachycardia due to the occurrence of two conducted ventricular beats for each sinus depolarization. Palpitations and arrhythmias were abolished after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway.     

房室结双径路消融中特殊电生理现象分析与处理

目的 :分析房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径路消融中特殊电生理现象及处理体会。方法 :慢径路消融前常规行心内电生理检查。结果 :有特殊电生理现象者 8例 ,其中 3例患者AVNRT开始时表现为房室 2 :1传导 ,阻滞点在希氏束以上部位 ;3例患者房室结功能曲线呈连续性 ;1例为慢 -慢型AVNRT ;1例心内电生理检查未能诱发出AVNRT。所有患者慢径消融均成功。结论 :术前应行详细的心内电生理检查和仔细鉴别 ,其消融方法与典型AVNRT相同     

Age Related Changes in Dual AV Nodal Physiology

Dual atrioventricular nodal (DAVN) physiology has been reported in up to 63% of pediatric patients with anatomically normal hearts, yet atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) accounts for only 13%–16% of supraventicular tachycardia (SVT) in childhood. The incidence of AVNRT increases with age and becomes the most common form of SVT by adolescence. We investigated the age related electrophysiological responses to programmed atrial and ventricular stimulation in 14 pediatric patients who underwent intracardiac electro-physiological study prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT and who exhibited DAVN physiology. Single atrial and ventricular extrastimuli were placed following drive trains with cycle lengths of 400–700 ms and 350–500 ms, respectively. Six children (mean age 8.2 years, range 5.2–11.5 years) were compared to eight adolescents (mean age 16.6 years, range 13.3–20.7 years). Adolescents were found to have a significantly longer fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) (median 375 vs 270 ms, P = 0.03), slow pathway ERP (median 270 vs 218 ms, P = 0.04), atrio-Hisian (AH) during AVNRT (median 300 vs 225 ms, P = 0.007), and AVNRT cycle length (median 350 vs 290ms, P = 0.03). There was a strong trend for the AH measured at the fast pathway ERP to be longer in adolescents than in children (median 258 vs 198 ms, P = 0.055). The AH at the fast pathway ERP was more strongly correlated with baseline cycle length than with age (r = 0.7, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.5, P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in the retrograde VA conduction between adolescents and children. These results demonstrate an age related difference in AV nodal response to programmed atrial stimuli in pediatric patients with DAVN physiology and AVNRT. These differences are consistent with mechanisms that may explain the increased incidence of AVNRT in adolescents compared to children.