A Phase II Trial of Sunitinib in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer and Untreated Brain Metastases

BackgroundThe expanded access program and anecdotal cases suggested sunitinib is safe in RCC patients with BM and might have worthwhile activity.Patients and MethodsIn a phase II trial, patients with untreated BM received the standard regimen of sunitinib. The primary end point was objective response (OR) rate in BM after 2 cycles. An OR rate of 35% was prospectively defined as the minimum needed to warrant further investigation. According to Simon's optimal 2-stage design, at least 3 of the initial 15 patients had to have an OR for accrual to continue.ResultsAmong 16 evaluable patients, 1 had a complete response outside the central nervous system (CNS). CNS disease was stabilized in 5 (31%). However, no BM showed an OR. Therefore, no further accrual took place. Median time to progression was 2.3 months and overall survival was 6.3 months. There was 1 toxic death, from peritonitis with gastric perforation. Three patients experienced at least 1 treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity but no neurological adverse events were attributable to sunitinib.ConclusionAlthough tolerability was acceptable in RCC patients with previously untreated BM, sunitinib has limited efficacy in this setting.     

Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant With Metronomic Capecitabine for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive,HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundIn this phase II study, we explored efficacy and toxicity of combined endocrine and low-dose metronomic chemotherapy therapy consisting of fulvestrant and capecitabine in estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.Patients and MethodsPatients with ≤ 1 previous hormonal treatment in the metastatic setting received an injection fulvestrant loading dose 500 mg on day 1, 250 mg on days 15 and 29 followed by 250 mg every 28 days along with continuous oral capecitabine in divided doses. The total fixed daily dose of capecitabine was either 1500 mg or 2000 mg, depending on the patient’s weight (< 80 kg vs. ≥ 80 kg). Primary end points were PFS and TTP. Toxicity was assessed by continuous evaluations of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes from baseline in laboratory values.ResultsForty-one women, with a mean age of 64.5 years, were enrolled. Patients completed a median of 11 monthly treatment cycles. Median PFS was 14.98 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.26-upper limit [UL] not estimated) and median TTP was 26.94 months (95% CI, 7.26-UL not estimated). Median overall survival was 28.65 months (95% CI, 23.95-UL not estimated). Treatment was well tolerated with < 10% Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Overall, the most frequent AEs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, and nausea.ConclusionFulvestrant with metronomic capecitabine demonstrates substantial activity in hormone receptor-positive MBC and is well tolerated. Combined chemoendocrine approaches should be further explored considering the low toxicity of the combination with meaningful TTP.     

A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only

Lessons Learned

• This regimen is a viable option for patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer.
• Enrollment criteria for future studies should include testing for the newly identified KRAS mutations.

Background.

Patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for potentially curative resection may become resectable with more aggressive chemotherapy regimens. In this nonrandomized trial, we evaluated folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor panitumumab as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC with liver-only metastasis.

Methods.

Patients received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, 3,200 mg/m², 48-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion; leucovorin, 200 mg/m² i.v.; irinotecan, 125 mg/m²; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m² i.v.) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg i.v.) on day 1 of 14-day cycles. Patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery every four cycles. Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate.

Results.

Fifteen patients (median age: 55 years; 87% male) received a median 6 cycles of treatment (range: 1–33 cycles); 10 patients (67%) were surgical candidates at baseline. Twelve patients were evaluable for clinical response; 9 (60%) achieved partial response. Ten patients underwent surgery; all had complete resections and pathologic partial response. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and rash (20%). Enrollment was halted because of emerging data on expanded KRAS/NRAS mutations beyond the region we initially examined, and the potential for negative interaction with oxaliplatin-based therapy. Eight patients underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis outside exon 2; no additional mutations were found.

Conclusion.

KRAS/NRAS mutations outside the region tested in this study were recently shown to be associated with inferior survival on similar treatment regimens. Therefore, this trial was stopped early. This regimen remains a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC in the KRAS/NRAS wild-type population. Enrollment criteria on future studies should include testing for the newly identified mutations.     

A Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone Followed by Randomization to Addition of Dasatinib or Sunitinib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BackgroundResistance to novel androgen signaling inhibition and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression is likely dependent on tumor microenvironment interactions. The Src pathway and neoangiogenesis have been implicated in prostate cancer progression. We studied the effect of adding the targeted agents dasatinib and sunitinib to abiraterone acetate (AA) in men with mCRPC.Patients and MethodsIn this open-label randomized phase 2 study, mCRPC patients received AA. At resistance to AA, they were randomized 1:1 to combination with dasatinib or sunitinib. At second progression, patients crossed over. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time to progression or death. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety.ResultsFrom March 2011 to February 2015, a total of 179 patients were enrolled and 132 subsequently randomized. Median TTF was 5.7 months in the dasatinib group and 5.5 months in the sunitinib group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of TTF (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.22). Median overall survival from study entry was 26.3 months in the dasatinib group and 27.7 months in the sunitinib group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.47). Grade 3 or higher adverse events related to study medication were more frequent with sunitinib (n = 44, 46%) compared to dasatinib (n = 26, 24%). At data cutoff, 7 patients were experiencing a continuous response to AA, with a median duration of treatment of 5.7 years.ConclusionThere is no difference in overall survival and TTF between dasatinib and sunitinib combined with abiraterone in the treatment of patients with bone mCRPC.     

MOMENTUM: A Phase I Trial Investigating 2 Schedules of Capecitabine With Aflibercept in Patients With Gastrointestinal and Breast Cancer

BackgroundAlthough data from preclinical and clinical studies provide a strong rationale for combining capecitabine with anti-angiogenic agents, clinical development of this fluoropyrimidine in combination with aflibercept has lagged behind other treatments. We conducted a nonrandomized, noncomparative, 2-arm, phase I trial to address this unmet need.Patients and MethodsPatients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer were sequentially recruited into a continuous (Arm A, starting dose 1100 mg/m²/day) or intermittent (Arm B, 2 weeks on/1 week off, starting dose 1700 mg/m²/day) capecitabine dosing arm. Aflibercept was administered at a flat dose of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both arms. A classical 3 + 3, dose-escalation design was used. The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended dose for phase II trials.ResultsThirty-eight eligible patients were recruited of whom 33 were assessable for DLTs (15 in arm A and 18 in arm B). Fourteen had colorectal cancer, 8 gastric cancer, and 11 breast cancer. DLTs included grade 2 hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 anorexia considered unacceptable by the patient, and grade 3 hypertension. The recommended dose for phase II trials for capecitabine was established at 1300 mg/m²/day in Arm A and 2500 mg/m²/day in Arm B with treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in 47% and 50% of patients, respectively. Among 26 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 15.4% in Arm A and 7.7% in Arm B.ConclusionCombining capecitabine with aflibercept is feasible and associated with a manageable safety profile and some anti-tumor activity in patients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer.     

A Phase I Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Buparlisib Combined With Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

Buparlisib is an oral pan-class I phosphotidyinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Exclusion of Patients With Brain Metastases in Published Phase III Clinical Trials for Advanced Breast Cancer

Metastatic HER2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) confer a 30% or higher risk of developing brain metastases (BrM), but BrM is typically an exclusion criteria for clinical trials, which limits the generalizability of trial results to these patients. We therefore analysed trends in the enrollment of patients with BrM, as well as the use of outcomes specific to the central nervous system (CNS), in phase III clinical trials evaluating systemic therapy for patients with advanced HER2+ and/or TNBC. Notably, 10 of the 34 trials (29%, 95% confidence interval = 15.1%-47.5%) evaluated CNS-specific outcomes and trials that completely excluded patients with BrM were significantly less likely to meet their primary endpoint (n = 6/17, 35%) than those that permitted conditional enrollment (n = 13/15, 87%) (P = .005), suggesting that enrollment of patients with BrM is not detrimental to trial success.     

A Phase II Trial of Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent or Progressive Brain Metastases

Background: Treatment options for patients with recurrent brain metastases are extremely limited. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent or progressive brain metastases. Patients and methods: Forty-one patients (11 men, 30 women) with a median KPS of 80 were treated with temozolomide 150mg/m²/day (200mg/m²/day if no prior chemotherapy) for 5 days; treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days. Primary tumor types included 22 non-small cell lung, 10 breast, three melanoma, two small cell lung, two rectal, one ovarian and one endometrial cancer. Results: There were five episodes of grade 3 thrombocytopenia and one grade 4 leukopenia. Significant non-hematologic toxicity possibly related to temozolomide included pneumonitis [2], constipation [1], and elevated liver enzymes [2]. Thirty-four patients were assessed for radiographic response; two had a partial response, 15 stable disease and 17 progressed. Both objective responses were seen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Overall median survival was 6.6 months. Conclusions: Single agent temozolomide achieved disease control (PR or SD) in 41% of patients with recurrent brain metastases from a variety of primary malignancies with minimal toxicity. Therefore, temozolomide may be a reasonable treatment option for some patients with recurrent brain metastases.     

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Palliative Radiotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining pembrolizumab with palliative radiation therapy (RT) improves outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsEligible patients had HR⁺/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC; were candidates for RT to ≥ 1 bone, soft tissue, or lymph node lesion; and had ≥ 1 lesion outside the RT field. Patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously 2 to 7 days prior to RT and on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles. RT was delivered to a previously unirradiated area in 5 treatments each of 4 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study used a 2-stage design: 8 women were enrolled into the first stage, and if at least 1 of 8 patients experienced an objective response, 19 more would be enrolled. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included association of overall response rate with programmed death-ligand 1 status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.ResultsEight patients were enrolled in stage 1. The median age was 59 years, and the median prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease was 2. There were no objective responses, and the study was closed to further accrual. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.1 months), and the median overall survival was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.6 months). All-cause adverse events occurred in 87.5% of patients, including just 1 grade 3 event (elevation of aspartate aminotransferase).ConclusionsRT combined with pembrolizumab did not produce an objective response in patients with heavily pre-treated HR⁺ MBC. Future studies should consider alternative radiation dosing and fractionation in patients with less heavily pre-treated HR⁺ MBC.     

Phase II Trial of Docetaxel/Capecitabine in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

BackgroundDocetaxel is the most active single agent in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Because of the preclinical and clinical evidence of synergy of capecitabine and docetaxel, it was hypothesized that this combination would be active and tolerable in HRPC.Patient and MethodsPatients received docetaxel 60 mg/m² intravenously over 60 minutes on day 1 of each 21-day cycle and capecitabine 1000 mg/m² administered orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled at 43 US Oncology sites. The median age was 69.3 years (range, 48-86 years); 86% were white, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0 and 1 were 49% and 51%, respectively. Sixty-nine (90%) patients were evaluable for prostate-specific antigen response.ResultsOverall, 41% of patients had a decreased prostate-specific antigen level ≥ 50%. There were 4 complete responses (6%), 24 partial responses (35%), 29 incidences of stable disease (43%), and 11 incidences of progressive disease (16%). Nine patients had stable disease ≥ 6 months, and the clinical benefit rate was 54%. The median time to response was 1.5 months (range, 1-6 months), and the median duration of response was 5.2 months (range, 1-16.9 months). The estimated survival at 12 and 24 months was 65% and 22%, respectively, with a median survival of 17 months (range, < 1-27 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (22%), hand-foot syndrome (17%), fatigue (11%), and nausea (11%).ConclusionDocetaxel/capecitabine is an active and tolerable combination in HRPC. Toxicity was acceptable and anticipated. Response rate and survival are comparable with other docetaxel combinations.