Nationwide surveillance of parenteral antibiotics containing meropenem activities against clinically isolated strains in 2002

The antibacterial activity of meropenem (MEPM) and other parenteral antibiotics against clinical isolates of 899 strains of Gram-positive bacteria, 1500 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, and 158 strains of anaerobic bacteria obtained from 28 medical institutions during 2002 was measured. The results were as follows; 1. MEPM was more active than other carbapenem antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria, especially against enterobacteriaceae and Haemophilus influenzae. MIC90 of MEPM against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the lowest of the drugs tested. MEPM showed low cross-resistant rate against both imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa. MEPM was active against most of the species tested in Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria, except for multi-drug resistant strains including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). 2. The proportion of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) strains was 3.1% (4 strains) in Escherichia coli and 1.9% (2 strains) in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Carbapenems including MEPM were active against these ESBL strains. In conclusion, the results from this surveillance study suggest that MEPM retains its potent and broad antibacterial activity and therefore is a clinically useful carbapenem; at present, 7 years after available for commercial use.     

Nationwide surveillance of parenteral antibiotics containing meropenem activities against clinically isolated strains in 2004

The antibacterial activity of meropenem (MEPM) and other parenteral antibiotics against clinical isolates of 907 strains of Gram-positive bacteria, 1790 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, and 192 strains of anaerobic bacteria obtained from 30 medical institutions during 2004 was measured. The results were as follows; 1. MIC90 of MEPM for almost all of enterobacteriaceae and Haemophilus influenzae were 4-fold to 32-fold lower than those of other carbapenems. MEPM was more active than other carbapenem antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria, especially against enterobacteriaceae and H. influenzae. MEPM were active against most of the species tested in Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria, except for multi-drug resistant strains including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. 2. As for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, imipenem (IPM) showed high cross-resistant rate againt meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (87.9%). MEPM showed low cross-resistant rate both againt IPM-resistant P. aeruginosa (49.2%) and ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa (38.0%). 3. The proportion of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) strains was 3.1% (4 strains) in Escherichia coli, 8.0% (2 strains) in Citrobacter koseri, 2.5% (3 strains) in Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2.5% (2 strains) in Enterobacter cloacae, 0.9% (1 strains) in Serratia marcescens, and 2.2% (2 strains) in Proteus mirabilis. The proportion of metallo-beta-lactamase strains was 1.6% (5 strains) in P. aeruginosa. 4. Of all species tested, Peptostreptococcus spp. was the only species, which MIC90 of MEPM was more than 4-fold higher than that in our previous study using clinical isolates during 2002 (0.25 microg/ml --> 1 microg/ml). Therefore, there is almost no siginificant decrease in susceptibility of clinical isolates to meropenem. In conclusion, the results from this surveillance study suggest that MEPM retains its potent and broad antibacterial activity and therefore is a clinically useful carbapenem at present, 9 years after available for commercial use.     

Nationwide surveillance of parenteral antibiotics containing meropenem activities against clinically isolated strains in 2009

The antibacterial activity of meropenem (MEPM) and other parenteral antibiotics against clinical isolates of 2655 strains including 810 strains of Gram-positive bacteria, 1635 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, and 210 strains of anaerobic bacteria obtained from 30 medical institutions during 2009 was examined. The results were as follows; (1) MEPM was more active than the other carbapenem antibiotics tested against Gram-negative bacteria, especially against enterobacteriaceae and Haemophilus influenzae. MEPM was also active against most of the species tested in Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria, except for multidrug resistant strains including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). (2) MEPM maintained potent and stable antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The proportion of MEPM-resistant strains to ciprofloxacin-resistant strains or imipenem-resistant strains were 53.1% and 58.0% respectively. (3) The proportion of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) strains was 3.1% (26 strains) in enterobacteriaceae. And the proportion of metallo-beta-lactamase strains was 2.0% (6 strains) in P. aeruginosa. (4) Of all species tested, there were no species except for Bacteroides fragilis group, which MIC90 of MEPM was more than 4-fold higher than those in our previous study. Therefore, there is almost no significant decrease in susceptibility of clinical isolates to meropenem. In conclusion, the results from this surveillance study suggest that MEPM retains its potent and broad antibacterial activity and therefore is a clinically useful carbapenem for serious infections treatment at present, 14 years passed after available for commercial use in Japan.     

Antimicrobial activities of meropenem against clinically isolated strains in 1997

In order to evaluate antimicrobial activity of meropenem (MEPM), minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEPM and control drugs were determined against clinical isolates in 1997. The results were as follows; 1. Antimicrobial activities of MEPM against Gram-positive bacteria were stronger than those of cephems (CEPs) and were approximately equal to those of imipenem (IPM) and panipenem (PAPM). 2. Carbapenems showed strong antimicrobial activities against Enterobacteriaceae, Glucose non-fermentative Gram-negative rods and Bacteroides fragilis group that were multiple drug resistant including the third generation CEPs. Antimicrobial activities of MEPM against these organisms were stronger than those of IPM and PAPM. By comparing antimicrobial activities of MEPM against Gram-negative bacteria in 1997 with those obtained in 1993, increase of resistance was not observed. 3. MIC-ranges of MEPM were low against the resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to IPM and PAPM. It was considered that these resistant strains were not expressing oprD products (D2 porin protein), forming main outer membrane porin channels of carbapenems and basic amino acids.     

Antimicrobial activities of meropenem against clinically isolated strains in 1999]

We determined the antibacterial activity of meropenem (MEPM) and control drugs against clinical isolates of 310 strains of Gram-positive bacteria (14 species), 590 strains of Gram-positive bacteria (21 species), and 120 strains of anaerobic bacteria (10 species) in 1999. We compared the results thus obtained with those in 1993 and 1997. The results were as follows; 1. MEPM showed excellent antibacterial activities against most of the species tested, except for MRSA, E. faecium, E. avium, and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). 2. MEPM had much higher activity than IPM and PAPM against Gram-negative bacteria including S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa, part of which have been reported to produce metallo-beta-lactamase. 3. There was little difference in the susceptibility of clinical isolates to MEPM between 1993 and 1999. Thus MEPM was shown to retain its potent and broad antibacterial activity now at the same level as before available for use in 1995.     

Antimicrobial activities of ceftriaxone against clinically isolated strains]

Antibiotic activities (MICs) of ceftriaxone (CTRX) against 1,210 strains of bacteria including 28 spp. isolated in 1987 and 1990 were compared with those of other cephems. 1. When compared to data on clinically isolated strains reported in the early 1980s, strains of the following species isolated in 1990 showed extremely elevated MIC90s of CTRX: Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Proteus vulgaris, Morganella morganii and Providencia spp. No changes were observed in MIC90s between the 2 periods for microorganisms such as Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Peptostreptococcus spp. 2. The MIC90 of CTRX to S. pneumoniae was high because a large number of benzylpenicillin (PCG)-insensitive S. pneumoniae (PISP) was present among this species. The MIC80 to Bacteroides fragilis group was also high because highly resistant B. fragilis and B. thetaiotaomicron were isolated in large proportions among the bacteria of this group. Other oxime-type cephems also had high MICs against the above mentioned bacteria. Therefore, a further evaluation has to be made with regard to activities of oxime-type cephems such as CTRX against PISP and B. fragilis group. 3. Sample strains included, in high ratios, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), cephamycin-resistant as well as oxime-type cephem-resistant intestinal bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and new-quinolone-resistant bacteria. Some of there resistant bacteria are also CTRX-resistant, and CTRX had insufficient activities against them. 4. With regard to the assessment of changes of frequencies of specific drug-resistant bacteria, including those with CTRX-resistance from year to year, the authors would like to point out the following comment of theirs made in 1989 and 1991, which appears to be increasing its significance, "Subjects of future studies should include dose on the mechanisms for the acquisition of bacterial resistance to entire beta-lactam antibiotics and the social circumstances in which resistant bacteria appear". 5. It appears that those strains resistant to cephems including CTRX are increasingly found among clinically isolated strains in recent years. CTRX, however, was found still effective against most clinical pathogens. Furthermore, considering that CTRX is one of the few drugs which sustain high blood concentrations of active forms we concluded that CTRX is a useful cephem-group antibiotic.     

Antimicrobial activities of beta-lactam antibiotics against clinically isolated Haemophilus influenzae]

Antimicrobial activities of oral beta-lactam antimicrobial agents against clinically isolated 131 strains of Haemophilus influenzae were studied. The peak of MICs of ampicillin (ABPC) was 0.20 microgram/ml. Those of cefaclor (CCL), cefotiam (CTM), cefteram (CFTM), cefpodoxime (CPDX), cefdinir (CFDN), cefditoren (CDTR), cefcapene (CFPN), and faropenem (FRPM) were 1.56, 0.39, 0.013, 0.05, 0.20, 0.013, 0.013, and 0.39 microgram/ml, respectively. The antimicrobial activities of CFTM, CDTR and CFPN were superior to those of others. There was 74.8% of ABPC-sensitive strains, of which the MICs were below 0.78 microgram/ml. The percentages of beta-lactamase-positive strains and beta-lactamase-negative ABPC-resistant H. influenzae (BLNAR) were 14.5% and 14%, respectively.     

Studies on sub-MIC activities of beta-lactam antibiotics and aminoglycoside antibiotics against clinically isolated strain

Sub-MIC range of 8 kinds of beta-lactam antibiotics and 3 kinds of aminoglycoside antibiotics against strain of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical source were determined by nephlometic method, and following results were obtained. When 10 strains of S. aureus tested to ampicillin (ABPC), hetacillin (IPABPC), mecillinam (MPC), cephalexin (CEX), cefotaxime (CTX), latamoxef (LMOX), cefatrizine (CFT), cephapirin (CEPR), gentamicin (GM), dibekacin (DKB) and amikacin (AMK), ratio of MIC to MAC were 36.8, 53.6, 156.8, 29.6, 61.6, 34.4, 50.0, 111.2, 9.2, 20.0 and 13.6, respectively. When 10 strains of K. pneumoniae tested to MPC, CEX, CTX, LMOX, CFT, CEPR, GM, DKB and AMK, ratio of MIC to MAC were 409.6, 10.4, 34.4, 123.2, 39.2, 167.2, 5.2, 5.6 and 13.2, respectively. When 10 strains of P. aeruginosa tested against CTX, LMOX, GM, DKB and AMK, ratio of MIC to MAC were 16.8, 38.4, 6.8, 3.2 and 10.4, respectively.     

Nationwide sensitivity surveillance of ciprofloxacin and various parenteral antibiotics against bacteria isolated from patients with severe infections--the first Ciproxan IV special investigation in 2001

The parenteral injection of ciprofloxacin (CPFX), a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drug, was approved in September 2000 and a re-examination period of 6 years was set at that time. As a special investigation to apply for re-examination of this drug, it has been planned to conduct 3 nationwide surveillances during the re-examination period by collecting clinically isolated bacteria from patients with severe infections, to whom the drug was mainly indicated, and examining drug susceptibilities of the bacteria to various parenteral antimicrobial drugs including CPFX. This time, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of various parenteral antimicrobial drugs including CPFX against 1,220 strains isolated from patients with severe infections by the micro-liquid dilution method and compared susceptibilities of various clinically isolated bacteria to CPFX with those to other antimicrobial drugs. Gram-positive bacteria were less susceptible to CPFX than to carbapenems except 2 bacterial species, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus avium but susceptibilities of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococcus faecalis to CPFX were comparable to those to cefozopran. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to CPFX did not differ among ampicillin (ABPC)-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC of ABPC: < 0.25 microgram/ml), ABPC-intermediate S. pneumoniae (MIC of ABPC: 0.25-2 micrograms/ml) and ABPC-resistant S. pneumoniae (MIC of ABPC: > or = 4 micrograms/ml) MIC90 of CPFX: 1 microgram/ml) and a decrease in the antimicrobial activity seen among cephem and carbapenem antimicrobial drugs against penicillin-intermediate strains was not noted with CPFX. Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to CPFX similarly to carbapenems and the MIC90 values of CPFX were in the range from < or = 0.063 to 2 micrograms/ml against strains except Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Burkholderia cepacia. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was most susceptible to CPFX among the antibacterial drugs examined and the MIC90 was 2 micrograms/ml. CPFX also showed the lowest MIC90 value (0.5 microgram/ml) against beta-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa among the drugs examined. When extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production and class B beta-lactamase production were examined in 439 strains of Enterobacteriaceae and 168 strains of glucose non-fermentative bacteria out of the Gram-negative bacteria collected this time, 3 strains (0.49%) producing ESBL and 7 strains (1.15%) producing class B beta-lactamase were found. The MIC range of CPFX to these 10 strains was between < or = 0.063 to 8 micrograms/ml and 5 strains among those showed susceptibilities (MIC of CPFX: 1 microgram/ml) based on the NCCLS breakpoint. CPFX also showed a satisfactory result concerning susceptibilities of major causal bacteria based on the report of the committee of Japan Society of Chemotherapy on the standard method for determination of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, the breakpoint of pneumonia. Furthermore, susceptibilities of various bacteria isolated clinically from patients with severe infections this time did not differ much from the result of the nationwide surveillance which we conducted in 1997. Thus, it was concluded that the antimicrobial activity of CPFX was maintained in the post-marketing surveillance for its parenteral preparation.     

Antimicrobial activities of carbapenems and fourth generation cephems against clinically isolated strains]

We determined the antibacterial activities of 4 carbapenems (imipenem, panipenem, meropenem and biapenem) and 2 forth generation cephems (cefozopran and cefepime) against 850 bacterial strains (18 species) isolated during the period from January 1998 through September 2000. The 4 carbapenems showed excellent antibacterial activities against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), S. pneumoniae, E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, M. (B). catarrhalis, B. fragilis and Peptostreptococcus spp. as compared with the cephems except the activity of panipenem against P. aeruginosa. Meropenem showed the highest antibacterial activity against 10 species of all Gram-negative strains determined. The antibacterial activities of 2 forth generation cephems against 6 species of Enterobacteriaceae were equal to or higher than those of carbapenems except meropenem. All drugs showed low antibacterial activities against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).     

Nationwide sensitivity surveillance of various antibiotic activities against bacteria isolated from patients with severe infections]

The susceptibility of 3,058 bacterial strains isolated between January and March, 1997 from patients with severe infections in Japan to ciprofloxacin and other injectable antimicrobial agents was measured using broth microdilution method. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were generally sensitive to vancomycin, teicoplanin and arbekacin, and resistant to CPFX and other antibacterial agents. MIC90 of CPFX against Streptococcus pneumoniae, to which MIC of ampicillin was more than 4 micrograms/mL, was below 2 micrograms/mL. PRSP (Penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae), which was also resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems, showed no cross-resistance to CPFX. The susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria to CPFX was as high as that to carbapenems. Especially, MIC90 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 2 micrograms/mL. 3 strains of isolated 446 P. aeruginosa strains had blaIMP gene. CPFX and pazufloxacin demonstrated good susceptibility with 0.25 microgram/mL of MIC to 2 strains of these 3 strains. The susceptibility rate of the most common isolates from patients suffering from lower respiratory tract infections excluding MRSA to CPFX was more than 80% (indication: % strains < pneumonia break point).     

Antibiotic activities of cefuzoname and the representative cephalosporins against clinically isolated methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus

Incidences of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus (MRS) have been increasing because of the extensive uses of cephalosporins and semisynthetic beta-lactamase-resistant penicillins. Most of these strains are known to be resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics due to their production of penicillinases and mutated penicillin-binding proteins. Our recent clinical isolates of MRS were also suspected to be this type because of their temperature sensitive resistance to methicillin. We studied in vitro antibiotic activity of cefuzoname (CZON) a cephalosporin developed against Staphylococcus, against these MRS in comparison with those of the representative cephalosporins, cefazolin (CEZ), cefamandole (CMD), cefotiam (CTM), cefoperazone (CPZ) and cefpiramide (CPM). It was found that CZON was the most active against MRS among these cephalosporins under normal body temperatures as well as at lower temperatures.     

Antibacterial activity of oral Cephems against various clinically isolated strains

We determined the antibacterial activities of oral Cephems against isolated from the patients with the respiratory infections, the urinary tract infections, and infections in the obstetrics field of an adult and a child, during the period from 2002 to 2003; Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli of 40 strains of each, and Peptostreptococcus spp. 22 strains. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae strains that resistant is regarded were collected mainly, penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae (PISP), penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) and beta-lactamase negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae (BLNAR) strains. The MICs of Cephems except cefaclor (CCL) were < or = 0.03 microgram/mL against all strains of S. pyogenes. The MICs of cefteram (CFTM) and cefditoren (CDTR) were < or = 0.0125 microgram/mL activity against 7 strains penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (PSSP). However the MIC90s of cefditoren (CDTR) was 1 microgram/mL, cefteram (CFTM), and cefcapene (CFPN) were 2 micrograms/mL against PISP and PRSP, were higher than those of other drugs, but showed slightly higher than PSSP. The MIC90s of Cephems. were 0.5-4 micrograms/mL against strains of E. coli. The MIC90s of CFTM was 0.5 microgram/mL, and CDTR, CFPN were 1 microgram/mL against E. coli were higher than those of other drugs. The four strains of E. coli however were highly-resistant which MIC90s of CCL were more than 32 micrograms/mL were obtains. Furthermore it is necessary to pay much attention to the trend of resistant such as E. coli of Cephems. Although all strains showed resistant to AMPC, MIC90 of Cephems were 0.25-1 microgram/mL, good activities against K. pneumoniae. Against beta-lactamase negative ampicillin-susceptible H. influenzae (BLNAS) 23 strains the MIC90s of CCL and other Cephems were 64 micrograms/mL and 0.25-8 micrograms/mL. The MIC90s of CDTR and CFTM were < or = 1 microgram/mL of BLNAR (15 strains). However there of CFDN and CPDX were 8 micrograms/mL and CCL were > or = 16 micrograms/mL. Two strains which were produced beta-lactamase were highly--ABPC resistant. Although B. catarrhalis all strains were produced beta-lactamase and Cephems except for CCL showed better susceptibility than AMPC. The MIC90s of Cephems were 0.25-2 micrograms/mL against Peptostreptococcus spp.     

Antimicrobial activity of meropenem against main bacterial species isolated from patient blood in 2006

Using broth micro-dilution method, we studied the susceptibility of 180 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis to meropenem (MEPM) and reference agents. All strains were isolated from the blood of patients admitted to Keio University Hospital between January 2006 and November 2006. The results were as follows: 1. MEPM showed greater potency against Gram-negative bacteria than the other carbapenems including doripenem in particular. A metallo-beta-lactamase producing multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strain was detected. 2. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of MEPM with that in our previous studies 1997-1998, 1999, 2002-2003, and 2004 showed no marked increase in MEPM-resistant clinical isolates. These results suggest that MEPM retains its potency as the agent of choice in treating serious infections.     

Combined antibacterial activity of aztreonam and clindamycin against clinically isolated strains

It has been reported in some studies that the combination of aztreonam (AZT) and clindamycin (CLDM) have high clinical effectiveness in the treatment of intractable infections. We, therefore, studied combined in vitro antibacterial activity of these 2 compounds using many freshly isolated strains. 1. AZT and CLDM in combination had synergistic effects on Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae, which are sensitive or quasi-sensitive to CLDM, in the presence of CLDM at MIC or sub-MIC. 2. For Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which are not sensitive to CLDM, the 2 drugs in combination showed synergistic effects on some species and additive or slightly additive effects on most species in the presence of CLDM at those concentrations which are usually maintained in blood. 3. The 2 drugs showed no antagonism.     

Antimicrobial activities of cefetamet against clinically isolated strains from community acquired respiratory tract infections. Part III]

Antimicrobial activities of cefetamet (CEMT) against clinically isolated strains from patients with community acquired respiratory tract infections were investigated in comparison with those of other oral beta-lactam antibiotics during the period from January to March, 1998. The results are summarized as follows; 1. CEMT showed strong antimicrobial activities against three major pathogens causing community acquired respiratory tract infections, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. However, antimicrobial activities of CEMT against penicillins (PCs)-intermediate S. pneumoniae (PISP) and PCs-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) were slightly weaker than those of some of the reference antibiotics. 2. No chronological changes of CEMT-MIC level were observed in the antimicrobial activities against S. pyogenes, H. influenzae, Moraxella subgenus Branhamella catarrhalis or Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae. In contrast to this, due to the increase of PISP and PRSP strains, resistance to CEMT appears increasing with time.     

Antibacterial activities of various aminoglycosides against clinically isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were isolated from samples collected from various patients during 1986, and antibacterial activities of 6 aminoglycosides (AGs) (netilmicin (NTL), gentamicin (GM), sisomicin (SISO), dibekacin (DKB), tobramycin (TOB) and amikacin (AMK] and 4 beta-lactam antibiotics (cefazolin (CEZ), cefmetazole (CMZ), cloxacillin (MCIPC) and methicillin (DMPPC) against these MRSA were evaluated. Among these 6 AGs, NTL was the most potent, and its MIC50 and MIC80 were 1.56 and 3.13 micrograms/ml, respectively. Antibacterial activities of GM, SISO, DKB and TOB were weak, and MIC50's of GM and DKB were both 100 micrograms/ml, while those of SISO and TOB were 50 and greater than 100 micrograms/ml, respectively. Frequency of highly resistant specimens to AMK was rather low and its MIC50 and MIC80 were 12.5 and 25 micrograms/ml, respectively. As for antibacterial activities of the above 4 beta-lactam antibiotics, the MIC50 and MIC80 of CMZ were 6.25 and 12.5 micrograms/ml, respectively, and therefore, its antibacterial activity to MRSA is relatively good. However, MIC50's of CEZ, MCIPC and DMPPC were all greater than 100 micrograms/ml, showing poor antibacterial activities. Recently, MRSA became a problem in various fields of clinical practice, and a number of literatures reporting refractory infections caused by MRSA have been published. Since MRSA is featured as multiply resistant bacteria, it is known that MRSA is resistant to the majority of existing antibiotics (penicillins, cephems, macrolides, AGs, etc.). In 1985, we reported results of our study concerning the antibacterial activities of a number of CEPs and some of AGs against multiply resistant S. aureus including MRSA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antimicrobial activities of major oral antibacterial agents against clinically isolated microbial strains from outpatients with respiratory tract infection]

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for major oral antibacterial agents for clinically isolated microbial strains from materials collected from outpatients with respiratory tract infections in 1988, 1989 and 1990, and the following conclusions were obtained. 1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) appeared to be responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections, but there also was a tendency showing that MRSA increased year by year. 2. A tendency was observed indicating that benzylpenicillin (PCG)-insensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae (PISP) increased year by year. 3. Beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae were observed in a certain ratio, and also those of Branhamella catarrhalis were found in high ratios. 4. A tendency of increasing resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to new quinolones was observed. 5. It is of a great importance to evaluate methods of selecting primary choice antibiotic agents since increasing numbers of new oral antibacterial agents are becoming rapidly available.     

Susceptibility of clinically isolated strains to aztreonam

In vitro antibacterial activities of aztreonam (AZT) and cephems against clinically isolated 334 strains were investigated. The results obtained in the study are summarized as follows: 1. AZT showed excellent antibacterial activities against clinically isolated 334 strains. 2. AZT showed potent activities against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus spp., Enterobacter aerogenes and Citrobacter freundii. 3. Antibacterial activities of AZT were superior against Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to those of cephems.