Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis in Lesions Treated With Palmaz-Schatz Stents

Objectives. This study sought to evaluate the clinical, procedural, preinterventional and postinterventional quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz stent placement.Background. Although Palmaz-Schatz stent placement reduces restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty, in-stent restenosis remains a major clinical problem.Methods. QCA and IVUS studies were performed before and after intervention (after stent placement and high pressure adjunct balloon angioplasty) in 382 lesions in 291 patients treated with 476 Palmaz-Schatz stents for whom follow-up QCA data were available 5.5 ± 4.8 months (mean ± SD) later. Univariate and multivariate predictors of QCA restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis at follow-up, follow-up percent diameter stenosis [DS] and follow-up minimal lumen diameter [MLD]) were determined.Results. Three variables were the most consistent predictors of the follow-up angiographic findings: ostial lesion location, IVUS preinterventional lesion site plaque burden (plaque/total arterial area) and IVUS assessment of final lumen dimensions (whether final lumen area or final MLD). All three variables predicted both the primary (binary restenosis) and secondary (follow-up MLD and follow-up DS) end points. In addition, a number of variables predicted one or more but not all the end points: 1) restenosis (IVUS preinterventional lumen and arterial area); 2) follow-up DS (QCA lesion length); and 3) follow-up MLD (QCA lesion length and preinterventional MLD and DS and IVUS preinterventional lumen and arterial area).Conclusions. Ostial lesion location and IVUS preinterventional plaque burden and postinterventional lumen dimensions were the most consistent predictors of angiographic in-stent restenosis.     

Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis

Objectives. This study was performed to determine predictors of in-stent restenosis from a high volume, single-center practice.Background. Intracoronary stents have been shown to reduce the restenosis rate as compared with balloon angioplasty, but in-stent restenosis continues to be an important clinical problem.Methods. Between April 1993 and March 1997, 1,706 patients with 2,343 lesions were treated with a variety of intracoronary stents. The majority of stents were placed with high pressure balloon inflations and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 1,173 patients with 1,633 lesions (70%). Clinical, angiographic and IVUS variables were prospectively recorded and analyzed by univariate and multivariate models for the ability to predict the occurrence of in-stent restenosis defined as a diameter stenosis ≥50%.Results. In-stent restenosis was angiographically documented in 282 patients with 409 lesions (25%). The restenosis group had a significantly longer total stent length, smaller reference lumen diameter, smaller final minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by angiography and smaller stent lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) by IVUS. In lesions where IVUS guidance was used, the restenosis rate was 24% as compared with 29% if IVUS was not used (p < 0.05). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, longer total stent length, smaller reference lumen diameter and smaller final MLD were strong predictors of in-stent restenosis. In lesions with IVUS guidance, IVUS stent lumen CSA was a better independent predictor than the angiographic measurements.Conclusions. Achieving an optimal stent lumen CSA by using IVUS guidance during the procedure and minimizing the total stent length may reduce in-stent restenosis.     

Discrepancy between morphologic and functional criteria of optimal stent deployment using intravascular ultrasound and pressure derived myocardial fractional flow reserve

BACKGROUND: Pressure derived myocardial FFR, a functional index of epicardial stenosis has been proposed for the assessment of optimal stent deployment. The following study evaluated the potential of serial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in comparison to the ‘gold standard’ intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for optimal stent deployment and its long‐term outcome. METHODS: 35 patients with a single de novo lesion underwent PTCA followed by stent implantation with an initial inflation pressure of 12 atm. If optimal stent expansion using IVUS‐criteria were not fulfilled, re‐dilatation at 16 atm as well as additional inflations with larger balloon sizes were performed to reach the procedural end‐point. IVUS and FFR were performed after each dilatation (n?=?136). Angiography was repeated after 6 months. RESULTS: In 30 pts who fulfilled IVUS criteria, mean lumen area (2.9±1.3?mm²) increased after PTCA and stent implantation to 10.0±3.0?mm². In six pts, optimum stent deployment according to a value of FFR?0.94 was not reached. Four of six pts reached the IVUS criteria at 12 atm and two pts at 16 atm, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values of FFR were 26 and 64%. Three of the 30 pts (10%) revealed a restenosis at three months follow‐up. One of these restenosis was seen in a patient with a post‐procedural FFR<0.94. CONCLUSIONS: FFR was not valid to predict optimal stent expansion according to IVUS criteria but could delineate under‐expanded stents despite a reasonable angiographic appearance. Morphologic (IVUS) and functional criteria (FFR) for optimal stent deployment revealed a comparably low restenosis rate.     

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with high speed rotational atherectomy and IVUS guidance in small <3.0 mm vessels

The management of in-stent restenosis remains a subject for debate because no one revascularization option is considered the most appropriate. Since a high restenosis rate still occurs after repeat balloon angioplasty, new techniques are attempted in order to reduce this rate. A combination of high speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty is likely to achieve good results. In small (<3.0 mm diameter) vessels, the risk of interaction between the burr and the stent increases. We thus used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with HSRA in small <3.0 mm small diameter vessels. Nine patients with in-stent restenosis in small vessels were referred for repeat angioplasty. Initial IVUS examination was used to assess the minimal stent struts diameter and to guide the burr size selection. A combination of HSRA and additional balloon angioplasty was performed under IVUS and angiographic guidance. Mean angiographic reference diameter was 2.25 ± 0.35 mm and mean stent struts diameter was 2.38 ± 0.20 mm. Burr size was selected ∼0.5 mm smaller than stent struts diameter and ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 mm, with a 0.88 ± 0.12 mean burr/artery ratio (range 0.71, 1.08). In two patients, a second larger burr was used. In 4/9 patients, the burr size chosen under IVUS guidance was close to angiographic MLD at stent implantation and thus larger than what would be used without IVUS guidance. Additional balloon angioplasty was decided in all cases, using a 1.1 ± 0.15 balloon/artery ratio. No complication occurred. Mean relative gain in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 94 ± 90% after HSRA and 54 ± 34% after balloon angioplasty (total relative gain 180 ± 100%). IVUS guidance allowed safe management of in-stent restenosis in small vessels using combination of HSRA and balloon angioplasty. Long-term follow-up and comparison with other techniques are necessary to assess whether this technique should be used routinely. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:77–82, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6-month restenosis rate: a multicenter,randomized study comparing two strategies—with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance

Objectives. We aimed to investigate the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation on the 6-month restenosis rate, which has not yet been fully established in randomized trials.Background. The 6-month angiographic restenosis rate was compared in patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease who were randomly allocated to angioplasty and stent deployment, with versus without IVUS guidance.Methods. After successful stent implantation, patients were randomized into two groups: Group A had no further dilation, and Group B had additional balloon dilation until achievement of IVUS criterion for stent expansion. The study group consisted of 164 patients, assuming a 50% reduction of the restenosis rate in Group B (15% vs. 30%) (alpha = 10%, beta = 20%).Results. We enrolled 155 patients. Overdilation was carried out in 31 (39%) of 79 Group B patients, with the IVUS criterion being achieved in 63 (80%) of 79. No significant difference was observed in the minimal luminal diameter (MLD), but the stent lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly larger in Group B (mean ± SD) (7.16 ± 2.48 vs. 7.95 ± 2.21 mm², p = 0.04). At 6 months, there was no significant difference in the restenosis rate, (28.8% [21 of 73] in Group A vs. 22.5% [16 of 71] in Group B, p = 0.25), but according to the observed difference in the restenosis rate, the power of the study was only 40%. The difference in MLD was also nonsignificant (1.60 ± 0.65 mm in Group A vs. 1.70 ± 0.64 mm in Group B, p = 0.20), whereas the lumen CSA was 20% larger in the IVUS-guided group (4.47 ± 2.59 vs. 5.36 ± 2.81 mm², p = 0.03). Lumen CSA was the only predictor of restenosis by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Conclusions. A nonsignificant 6.3% absolute reduction in the restenosis rate and a nonsignificant difference in MLD were observed in this study. Nonetheless, we still cannot rule out a beneficial effect of IVUS guidance, although this may have gone undetected owing to a lack of statistical power. A significant increase was observed in immediate and 6-month lumen size, as detected by IVUS, indicating that ultrasound guidance in stent deployment may be beneficial.     

Intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting in long lesions: an insight into possible mechanisms of restenosis and comparison of angiographic and intravascular ultrasound data from the MUSIC and RENEWAL trials

The high restenosis rates in long stents may be related to suboptimal stent deployment. In an attempt to understand the potential components associated with restenosis in long stents, this study compares angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data from the MUSIC and RENEWAL studies where IVUS was used to optimize stent deployment in short (< 15 mm) and long (> 20 mm) coronary lesions, respectively. The RENEWAL study, a randomized trial, compared the NIR stent and Wallstent in long (> 20 mm) coronary lesions and used on-line visual IVUS criteria to optimize stent expansion. Detailed analysis of IVUS data was performed off line. Angiographic and IVUS data from this study was compared to that from the MUSIC study. Initial stent deployment was deemed optimal by the operator after visual angiographic and IVUS assessment in 50 of 70 lesions. In the remaining 20 lesions further balloon inflations were required to optimize stent apposition that led to an average gain in minimal in-stent luminal area (MISA) of 15.9% (P < 0.01). Off-line IVUS data analysis showed that the number reaching "MUSIC criteria" for optimal stent deployment preredilatation was 8 (11.4%) of 70 and 14 (20%) of 70 postredilatation. The ratio of MISA/MRAprox (mean proximal reference area) was 0.69 in RENEWAL. At 6-month follow-up, the angiographic restenosis rate in RENEWAL was 36% and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 7.8%, compared with MUSIC's 9.7% and 4.5%, respectively. In conclusion, angiographic assessment of stent deployment in long lesions is limited. On-line visual IVUS with further balloon inflations to improve stent apposition led to a significant gain in MISA, but the MISA/MRAprox ratio remained suboptimal. Therefore, suboptimal stent deployment due to constraint by lesion resistance may be an important mechanism underlying the high restenosis rates in long stents.     

Restenosis rate after intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stent implantation

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients fulfilling intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for optimal coronary stent implantation show a reduction in the restenosis rate at 6 months. IVUS guidance for stent dilation may be associated with faciliated stent implantation and an increased acute luminal gain, but it has not yet been determined, whether and to what extent this procedure is associated with a reduction in the restenosis rate. IVUS-guided optimization of Palmaz-Schatz stent placement was performed in 125 consecutive patients, 64 of whom fulfilled IVUS-criteria for optimal stent placement. Another 125 patients served as the non-IVUS control group. In 107 patients (86%) of the non-IVUS control group and 105 patients (84 %) of the IVUS group, angiographic follow-up was performed. The IVUS group of patients revealed a significantly lower restenosis rate of 20.9% as compared with 29.9% in the control group (P = 0.033). Patients that met IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement had a larger minimal lumen diameter immediately after stent implantation (3.13 ± 0.44 vs. 2.95 ± 0.47 mm; P = 0.045) and at 6-month follow-up (2.23 ± 0.78 vs. 1.87 ± 0.76 mm; P = 0.019) as well as a significantly lower restenosis rate (13.5% vs. 28.3%; P = 0.038) as compared with patients that did not fulfil these criteria. Our data suggest that patients fulfilling IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement demonstrate a reduced risk for the development of restenosis. Thus, IVUS investigation identifies factors predictive of restenosis after coronary stent placement. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:380–386, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL Study

BACKGROUND: The role of coronary stents in reducing the incidence of acute complications and late restenosis after angioplasty has been established in randomized studies focusing on simple, short coronary lesions. The development of long coronary stents has provided a safe and predictable means of treating long coronary lesions, but this carries with it a higher risk of restenosis. By comparing the outcome of treating long lesions with two different stent types, we aimed to assess the influence of stent design rather than the nature of long lesions per se on the relatively high restenosis rates in this subgroup. METHODS: This study was designed to assess procedural complications and 6-month restenosis rates in a randomized trial comparing a slotted tube stent with a self-expanding stent for the treatment of long coronary lesions. Randomization of vessels to either stent occurred after successful balloon angioplasty. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used to assess and optimize stent deployment. The patients were restudied angiographically and by IVUS at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients (85 vessels) were recruited (slotted tube stent, n = 44 vessels; self-expanding stent, n = 41 vessels). Successful deployment occurred in 41 (100%) of 41 of the self-expanding stent group and 41 (93%) of 44 of the slotted tube stent group. There was no difference in lesion length between the two groups (slotted tube stent, 26.6 +/- 6.9 [SD] mm; self-expanding stent, 28.7 +/- 9.8 [SD] mm; P = .2), but the mean length of the self-expanding stent was greater than that of the slotted tube stent (41.6 +/- 18.8 [SD] mm vs 35.4 +/- 16.2 [SD] mm, respectively; P < .05). There was no significant difference in the rate of major events between the two groups at 6-month follow-up. The angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up was less in the slotted tube stent group, but this did not reach statistical significance (26% vs 46%, respectively; P = .1) and the target lesion revascularization rate was similar for both groups (7.9% vs 7.7%, respectively; P = .8). IVUS assessment of plaque/stent ratios suggested a greater plaque burden in the self-expanding stent compared with the slotted tube stent at follow-up (0.42 +/- 1.2 [SD] vs 0.3 +/- 0.08 [SD]), but this was not statistically significant (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: Long stents can be safely and successfully deployed in long segment coronary disease, with an acceptable 6-month target lesion revascularization rate. Our results showed a trend toward lower angiographic restenosis and a lesser in-stent plaque burden at follow-up in the slotted tube stent compared with the self-expanding stent. This suggests that stent design may influence the restenotic process in long coronary lesions.     

Standardized angiographically guided over-dilatation of stents using high pressure technique optimize results without increasing risks

BACKGROUND: Routine angio-guided stent deployment results in a relatively high restenosis rate, which is mostly due to stent sub-expansion. Several different intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for optimal stent deployment have been proposed. A minimal in-stent restenosis and a minimal in-stent lumen area of > or = 9 mm2 have been associated with low rates of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months. The role of high-pressure stent deployment and/or upsizing the post-dilatation balloon has not yet been clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of achieving accepted IVUS criteria safely without IVUS guidance with the combination of high-pressure deployment and post-dilatation with a 0.25 mm oversized balloon. METHODS: Thirty-four stents (26 NIR, 3 AVE GFX, 3 ACS GFX, 1 Bard, 1 Jostent) were implanted in 30 patients until optimal angiographical results were obtained (< 10% residual stenosis visually). Forty percent of the patients had unstable angina pectoris, forty-four percent had complex lesions (B2 and C) and 29% were occlusions. Mean inflation pressure was 12.6 +/- 1.6 atm, mean stent diameter was 3.2+/- 0.4 mm and mean stent length was 15.1+/- 5.4 mm. Post-dilatation was performed with the same stent using a short (compared to the angiographic reference segment), 0.25 mm oversized Scimed Maxxum Energy 3.5 +/- 0.4 mm balloon using high pressure (16.1 +/- 1.7 atm) followed by an off-line IVUS examination of the stents. There was clinical follow-up for 1 year. Results in patients with single-vessel disease were compared with those of non-randomized controls, who were stented with high pressure but without over-dilatation. RESULTS: No stent achieved the nominal diameter, in spite of over-dilatation. Mean minimal stent diameter (MLD) according to IVUS was 2.9 +/- 0.4 mm (92% of the angiographic reference diameter). Mean minimal lumen area (MLA) was 7.7 +/- 2.2 mm2. An in-stent MLA > or = 90% of the distal reference segment (AVID criteria) and an MLA > or = 100% or > or = 90% of the smallest/average reference segment (MUSIC criteria) was found in 67% and 57%, respectively. MLA > or = 9 mm2 was achieved in 38%. All stents had good apposition and obtained a symmetry index > or = 0.7 mm. No acute perforations, dissections or other serious complications occurred during the over-dilatation. At 1 year, five patients had re-angina leading to a new coronary angiography; only 1 patient had a significant in-stent restenosis requiring re-PTCA. Compared to non-overdilated historical controls, the standardized over-dilatation seemed to give a larger MLD (3.0 +/- 0.4 mm vs. 2.7 +/- 0.4 mm; p = 0.03), more patients who fulfilled AVID criteria (70% vs. 32%; p = 0.048) and more stents with MLA > or = 9 mm2 (46% vs. 11%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A standardized 0.25 mm over-dilatation of stents never achieved nominal stent size, but did improve lumen gain and was associated with low target vessel revascularization without adding complications to the routine stenting procedure.     

Long-term outcomes of minor plaque prolapsed within stents documented with intravascular ultrasound.

The direct relationship between minor plaque prolapsed within stents and late in-stent restenosis is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of minor plaque prolapse on late angiographic in-stent restenosis. Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided single-coronary stenting was successfully performed on 384 consecutive patients with 407 native coronary lesions. Six-month follow-up angiographic evaluation was performed on 315 patients (82. 0%) with 334 lesions (82.1%). Minor plaque prolapsed within the stent was found in 75 of 334 lesions (22.5%). Results were evaluated using angiographic and IVUS methods. The development of minor plaque prolapse was significantly associated with infarct-related artery (P = 0.000) and small pre-intervention minimal lumen diameter (P = 0. 001). The overall angiographic restenosis rate was 23.1% (77/334)-21.3% (16/75) in the lesions with plaque prolapse vs. 23.6% (61/259) in the lesions without plaque prolapse (P = 0.806). In conclusion, minor plaque prolapsed within stents might not be associated with late angiographic in-stent restenosis.     

Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis comparing double kissing and classical crush stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions

Background : Compared with the classical crush, double kissing (DK) crush improved outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. However, there is no serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) comparisons between these two techniques. Objectives : This study aimed to analyze the mechanisms of the two crush stenting techniques using serial IVUS imaging. Methods : A total of 54 patients with IVUS images at baseline, post‐stenting and eight‐month follow‐up were classified into classical (n = 16) and DK (n = 38) groups. All patients underwent final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI). Unsatisfactory kissing (KUS) was defined as the presence of wrist or >20% stenosis during FKBI at the side branch (SB) ostium. The vessels at bifurcation lesions were divided into the proximal main vessel (MV) stent, the crushed segment, the distal MV stent, the SB ostium and the SB stent body. Results : KUS and incomplete crushing were commonly observed in the classical group (62.5%, 81.3%), compared with DK group (18.0%, 39.5%, P < 0.001 and P = 0.004). The post‐stenting stent symmetry in the classical group was 71.85 ± 7.69% relative to 85.93 ± 6.09% in DK group (P = 0.022), resulting in significant differences in neointimal hyperplasia (NIH, 1.60 ± 0.21 mm² vs. 0.85 ± 0.23 mm², P = 0.005), late lumen loss (1.31 ± 0.81 mm² vs. 0.55 ± 0.70 mm², P = 0.013), and minimal lumen area (MLA, 3.57 ± 1.52 mm² vs. 4.52 ± 1.40 mm^2, P = 0.042) at the SB ostium between two groups. KUS was positively correlated with the incomplete crush and was the only predictor of in‐stent‐restenosis (ISR) at the SB ostium. Conclusion : DK crush was associated with improved quality of the FKBI and larger MLA. KUS predicted the occurrence of ISR. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Results of the Jostent coronary stent graft implantation in various clinical settings: procedural and follow-up results.

The Jostent coronary stent graft (CSG) is composed of a PTFE layer sandwiched between two stainless steel stents, initially introduced for the treatment of coronary perforations and aneurysms with excellent results. By providing a mechanical barrier, this stent design also may be beneficial in the treatment of complex ulcerated lesions and in-stent restenosis by preventing debris protrusion and neointimal proliferation through the stent struts. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this stent graft, we implanted 78 CSGs in 70 patients for a broad range of indications, including coronary perforations, aneurysms, degenerated saphenous vein grafts, complex lesions, and in-stent restenosis. The primary angiographic success rate (95.9%) was high, and using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during stent implantation and high inflation pressures (19.3 +/- 3.2 atm), stent expansion with optimal symmetry was achieved in 94.7%. One limitation of the Jostent CSG was the side-branch occlusion rate (18.6%) and the resulting non-Q-wave infarction rate in seven cases (mean CK elevation, 238 U/l), acute Q-wave MI in two cases, and transient ventricular fibrillation in one patient after occlusion of the proximal RCA side branch without further complications. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in four cases (5.7%) 7 to 70 days after stent implantation, despite using combined antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, and/or clopidogrel for 30 days. Angiographic follow-up was available in 56 patients (80.0%) after a mean of 159 +/- 49 days, and follow-up IVUS was available in 38 cases. The overall restenosis rate (> 50% diameter stenosis) was 31.6% manifest primarily as edge restenosis (29.8% stent edge vs. 8.8% stent center; P < 0.001). IVUS examinations showed a minimal late lumen loss of 0.4 +/- 2.2 mm(2) within the center of the stent graft vs. 3.2 +/- 2.3 mm(2) at the stent edges (P < 0.001). The restenosis rate in the prespecified subgroups was 33.3% for saphenous vein grafts (2/6 lesions), 30.0% in complex lesions (6/20 lesions), and 38.5% (10/26 lesions) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Implantation of the Jostent CSG is feasible and safe, even in complex lesion subsets, and is associated with high primary success rates provided major side branches are avoided. The use of this stent may require an extended time course of antiplatelet therapy. Frequent focal stent edge renarrowing influences the overall restenosis rate. However, in treatment of complex in-stent restenosis and vein graft lesions, stent grafts may offer benefit over conventional therapies. Covered stents such as the JoMed coronary stent graft may become essential for bailout treatment of coronary perforations.     

Sirolimus-eluting stent in chronic total occlusion: the SICTO study

Coronary stenting can significantly reduce the restenosis and reocclusion rates after successful balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions (CTO). Nevertheless, recanalization of CTO remains among the worst predictors for in-stent restenosis and reocclusion. This multicenter, nonrandomized study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent in reducing angiographic in-stent late loss in totally occluded native coronary arteries. A total of 25 eligible patients were treated with the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent. Baseline clinical and angiographic data were collected and 6-month follow-up angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed. Clinical follow-up was required at 30 days, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Study stent implantation was successful in all patients, with a mean stent length of 28.4 +/- 11 mm. Six-month angiographic outcomes showed that mean lumen diameter stenosis did not change (2.22 +/- 0.56 mm postprocedure; 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm at 6 months follow-up; P = NS). Similarly, mean percent diameter stenosis did not change significantly (15.7 +/- 8.6% postprocedure, 19.3 +/- 11% at follow-up; P = NS). The absolute late lumen loss was -0.03 +/- 0.28 mm with a 6-month in-stent restenosis rate of 0%. IVUS follow-up revealed in-stent obstruction volume of only 4.9 +/- 6.8%. Long-term clinical follow-up showed target lesion revascularization at 12 months was only 4%, with target vessel revascularization of only 12%. The CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent was safe and effective in the treatment of CTO compared to historical data with bare metal stents.     

Experimental Results with 90Yttrium Beta-Particle Emitting Radioactive Stents in a Porcine Model of Restenosis

Background: Radioactive stents have been proposed as a means to prevent restenosis. The ideal radioisotope to deliver endovascular irradiation via a radioactive stent is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the dose response effects of “high” dose rate irradiation delivered by a high energy, short half-life, beta-particle emitting ⁹⁰yttrium (⁹⁰Y) radioactive stent on neointimal formation in a porcine coronary model of restenosis. Methods: Fifty-two 0–16.0 μCi ⁹⁰y radioactive stents were implanted in the coronary arteries of 19 swine. Stents were oversized 10% to 20% greater than the baseline angiographic lumen diameter. After 28 days, quantitative histological analysis was completed to determine neointimal area and percent in-stent stenosis. Results: The mean vessel injury scores were similar for the control and each of the ⁹⁰Y radioactive stent groups. Neointimal area correlated with vessel injury for the control (r =0.54, P < 0.0001) stents. The percent in-stent stenosis was similar for the nonradioactive control and the 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.25, 2.0, 8.0, and 16.0 μCi ⁹⁰Y radioactive stents. The neointimal area was greater for the 4.0 μCi (3.95 ± 1.16 mm²) and 8.0 μCi (3.55 ± 1.09 mm²) ⁹⁰Y stents as compared with the nonradioactive control stents (2.40 ± 7.72 mm², P ≤ 0.03). The increased neointimal area for the 4.0 μ⁹⁰Y stents resulted in significantly greater percent in-stent stenosis (55 ± 12) versus control nonradioactive stents (36 ± 18, P < 0.05). Conclusions: A radioactive stent manufactured with the short half-life beta-particle emitting radioisotope ⁹⁰Y, designed to deliver a higher dose rate at implant than a ³²P radioactive stent, is ineffective in reducing neointimal formation in the porcine coronary model of restenosis. Further study is required to define effective cumulative dose and dose rate delivery for radioactive stents.     

国产与进口西罗莫司洗脱支架置入后血管内超声随访的对比

目的 利用血管内超声对比观察国产与进口西罗莫司洗脱支架对冠心病患者支架术后新生内膜增生的抑制作用.方法 2003年5月至2007年3月,对215例冠心病患者(317处病变)置入西罗莫司洗脱支架,并在术后1年行冠状动脉造影和血管内超声(IVUS)检查.其中Firebird组108例患者(147处病变)置入国产西罗莫司洗脱支架(Firebird支架),Cypher组107例患者(138处病变)置入进121西罗莫司洗脱支架(Cypher支架).结果 两组患者一般临床情况差异无统计学意义.两组靶病变部位、病变长度、狭窄程度及病变类型差异均无统计学意义,但Firebird组术后最小管腔直径大于Cypher组[(2.88±0.43)mm比(2.78±0.33)mm,P＜0.05].随访定量冠状动脉造影分析显示,Firebird组与Cypher组支架内晚期管腔丢失[(0.17±0.29)mm比(0.16±0.27)mm,P＞0.05]和节段内晚期管腔丢失[(0.18±0.36)mm比(0.20±0.32)mm,P＞0.05]差异均无统计学意义.IVUS分析显示,与Cypher组比较,尽管Firebird组支架面积[(6.99±2.25)mm~2比(6.46±1.71)mm~2,P＜0.05]、管腔面积[(6.89±2.30)nm~2比(6.36±1.73)mm~2,P＜0.05]、支架体积[(162.5±68.9)mm~3比(140.8±57.9)mm~3,P＜0.01]、管腔体积[(160.4±69.5)mm~3比(138.6±57.6)mm~3,P＜0.01]及最小支架面积[(5.40±1.85)mm~2比(4.92±1.43)mm~2,P＜0.05]均较大,但两组的内膜增生容积[(2.09±5.46)mm~3比(2.23±6.50)mm~3,P＞0.05]和内膜增生容积百分数[(1.68±5.84)%比(1.59±4.10)%,P＞0.05]差异均无统计学意义.结论 Firebird支架置人后再狭窄的发生率较低,抑制内膜增生作用与Cypher支架相似.     

Angiographic and clinical restenosis following the use of long coronary wallstents

This study assessed clinical and angiographic restenosis following the deployment of the long coronary Wallstent. Between May 1995 and June 1997, 182 Wallstents were deployed in 162 vessels in this unit. Forty-eight percent had an unstable coronary syndrome and 94% had AHA grade B or C lesions. The mean lesion length was 37 ± 20 mm and the mean stent length was 48 ± 20 mm. The procedural success rate was 99% and the primary success rate was 93%. Six in-patients suffered subacute stent thrombosis, the majority being in the era of anticoagulation rather than antiplatelet regimes. Seventy-three percent remained free of major adverse clinical events in the follow-up period, but 41% had angiographic restenosis. The Wallstent can be deployed in complex lesions with a high primary success rate and an acceptably low restenosis rate. The optimal management of in-stent restenosis remains to be defined. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:287–293, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Angiographic outcomes with biodegradable polymer and permanent polymer drug‐eluting stents

Background : In the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of 3 Limus‐Eluting Stents (ISAR‐TEST‐4) trial, we demonstrated the noninferiority of biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus‐eluting stent to permanent polymer (PP) sirolimus/everolimus‐eluting stent (Cypher/Xience‐V) on the basis of clinical outcomes. In this study, we compare the antirestenotic efficacy of these stents in ISAR‐TEST‐4 patients with paired angiographic studies. Methods : Patients with de novo coronary lesions in native vessels (excluding left main lesions) were randomly assigned to receive a BP stent or a PP stent. Endpoints of interest of this study were in‐stent late lumen loss, in‐segment binary restenosis, and restenosis morphology at 6–8‐month follow‐up angiogram. Results : Of the 2,603 patients (3,372 lesions) enrolled in ISAR TEST‐4 trial, 2,016 patients (2,637 lesions) underwent repeat angiographic examination 6–8 months after randomization: 1,006 patients (1,323 lesions) treated with BP stents and 1,010 patients (1,314 lesions) treated with PP stents. No difference was observed between BP and PP stents in in‐stent late lumen loss (0.24 ± 0.6 vs. 0.26 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, P = 0.49) or in in‐segment binary restenosis (11.6% [153 lesions] vs. 11.8% [155 lesions], P = 0.85). Focal pattern of restenosis was observed in the majority of patients receiving either BP or PP stents. The diffuse pattern of restenosis was observed in 26.8% of patients treated with BP stent and 26.5% of patients treated with PP stent (P = 0.79). Conclusion : Angiographic characteristics of restenosis after BP‐based limus‐eluting stents are similar to those of PP‐based limus‐eluting stents. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Progressive vascular remodeling and reduced neointimal formation after placement of a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent in an experimental model

Despite the improvements afforded by intracoronary stenting, restenosis remains a significant problem. The optimal physical properties of a stent have not been defined. We compared the vascular response to a thermoelastic self-expanding nitinol stent with a balloon-expandable tubular slotted stainless steel stent in normal porcine coronary arteries. Twenty-two stents (11 nitinol and 11 tubular slotted) were implanted in 11 miniature swine. The nitinol stents were deployed using the intrinsic thermal properties of the metal, without adjunctive balloon dilation. The tubular slotted stents were implanted using a noncompliant balloon with a mean inflation pressure of 12 atm. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and histology were used to evaluate the vascular response to the stents. The mean cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nitinol stents (mm²) as measured by IVUS increased from 8.13 ± 1.09 at implant to 9.10 ± 0.99 after 28 days (P = 0.038), while the mean CSA of the tubular slotted stents was unchanged (7.84 ± 1.39 mm² vs. 7.10 ± 1.07 mm², P = 0.25). On histology at 3 days, the tubular slotted stents had more inflammatory cells adjacent to the stent wires (5.7 ± 1.5 cells/0.1 mm²) than the nitinol (3.9 ± 1.3 cells/0.1 mm², P = 0.016). The tubular slotted also had increased thrombus thickness (83 ± 85 μ) than the nitinol stents (43 ± 25 μ, P = 0.0014). After 28 days, the vessel injury score was similar for the nitinol (0.6 ± 0.3) and the tubular slotted (0.5 ± 0.1, P = 0.73) designs. The mean neointimal area (0.97 ± 0.46 mm² vs. 1.96 ± 0.34 mm², P = 0.002) and percent area stenosis (15 ± 7 vs. 33 ± 7, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the nitinol than in the tubular slotted stents, respectively. We conclude that a thermoelastic nitinol stent exerts a more favorable effect on vascular remodeling, with less neointimal formation, than a balloon-expandable design. Progressive intrinsic stent expansion after implant does not appear to stimulate neointimal formation and, therefore, may provide a mechanical solution to prevent in-stent restenosis. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:193–201, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Is adjunctive balloon postdilatation necessary after coronary stent deployment? Final results from the POSTIT trial

Early-generation balloon-expandable stents required postdilatation with noncompliant balloons at high pressure to optimize stent deployment. The need for adjunctive balloon postdilatation with modern stent delivery systems is unknown. Patients undergoing elective stenting were randomized to Boston Scientific NIR, Guidant Tri-Star/Tetra, and Medtronic AVE S670 stents. The primary endpoint was optimum stent deployment defined as a minimal stent diameter (MSD) >/= 90% of the average reference lumen diameter assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed immediately following stent deployment. If, by operator assessment, the primary endpoint was not achieved with the stent delivery system, adjunctive postdilatation with noncompliant balloons was performed. Of 256 patients with IVUS studies adequate for core laboratory analysis, only 29% achieved optimum stent deployment with the stent delivery system. None of the baseline clinical or angiographic variables predicted optimum stent deployment. Of the procedural variables, the type of stent and nominal stent size were not predictors, but higher deployment pressures were associated with a higher frequency of optimum stent deployment (< 12 atm 14% vs. >/= 12 atm 36%; P = 0.007). The inability to achieve optimum stent deployment was not due to undersizing the stent delivery balloon, but rather to an inability of the stent delivery balloon to expand fully the stent to nominal size. In patients who underwent postdilatation, the frequency of achieving optimum stent deployment increased from 21% to 42%, minimal stent area increased from 6.6 +/- 2.2 to 7.8 +/- 2.3 mm(2), and MSD increased from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 2.8 +/- 0.4 mm. These data stress the continued need for adjunctive balloon postdilatation with modern stent delivery systems. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:184-192.     

Analysis of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions treated with biolimus‐eluting DEVAX AXXESS plus nitinol self‐expanding stent: Intravascular ultrasound results of the AXXENT trial

Objective: To assess the efficacy of the AXXESS stent on the treatment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions using IVUS. Background: The treatment of LMCA bifurcation lesions remains challenging even with the use of drug‐eluting stents. The AXXESS system is a biolimus A9‐eluting self‐expanding stent, dedicated to the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Methods: Data were obtained from the AXXENT trial, a prospective, single‐arm, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy of the AXXESS stent on the treatment of LMCA bifurcation lesions. IVUS was available in 26 cases at 6‐months follow‐up. Volumetric and cross‐sectional analyses within the AXXESS stent, and cross‐sectional analyses at the ostia of left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex coronary arteries (LCX) were performed. Results: Within the AXXESS stent, percent neointimal volume obstruction was (3.0 ± 4.1)% with a minimal lumen area of 10.3 ± 2.6 mm². AXXESS stent volume showed an 12.4% increase at follow‐up compared with postprocedure (P = 0.04). Lumen area was significantly smaller in the LCX ostium compared with the LAD ostium at follow‐up (3.6 ± 1.3 mm² vs. 5.5 ± 2.0 mm², P = 0.0112). There was greater neointimal formation in the LCX ostium compared with the LAD ostium (1.37 ± 1.20 mm² vs. 0.30 ± 0.36 mm², P = 0.0003). Conclusions: The AXXESS stent in the LMCA showed enlargement through 6‐months follow‐up and significant neointimal suppression. Greater neointimal formation and relatively inadequate stent expansion may contribute to luminal narrowing in the LCX ostium. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.