Eczema

Atopic dermatitis, commonly known as eczema, is a common chronic, relapsing skin disease characterized by pruritus, disrupted epidermal barrier function, and immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitization to food and environmental allergens. Atopic dermatitis is a complex disease that arises from interactions between genes and the environment. Loci on several chromosomes have been identified, including a family of epithelium-related genes called the epidermal differentiation complex on chromosome 1q21. Mutations in filaggrin, a key protein in epidermal differentiation, have also been identified in early-onset and severe atopic dermatitis. There are 3 classical stages of eczema: infantile, childhood, and adulthood. The spectrum of eczema presentation varies widely from a variant that only affect the hand to major forms where a patient presents with erythroderma. The acute and subacute lesions of atopic dermatitis are often characterized by intensely pruritic, erythematous papules and vesicles with excoriations and a serous exudate. Chronic atopic dermatitis is exemplified by lichenified plaques and papules with excoriations. Atopic dermatitis patients are also at higher risk for skin infections, including bacterial and viral superinfections. Conventional therapy includes avoidance of irritants and potential allergens, as well as continued hydration of the skin with thick emollients. Topical corticosteroids and topical immunomodulators are often used primarily. Other therapies including phototherapy, antimicrobials, antihistamines, and systemic immunosuppressives are also options in certain situations.     

The economics of topical immunomodulators for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease frequently affecting infants and children. The worldwide prevalence of atopic dermatitis is estimated to be 5--20% of the paediatric population. First-line therapy has generally consisted of dry skin care, avoidance of triggers, application of topical corticosteroids, and administration of antihistamines and oral antibacterials. Topical corticosteroids improve the lesions of atopic dermatitis; however, concern on the part of physicians and patients regarding adverse effects has led to reluctance to utilise topical corticosteroids early and especially for prolonged periods. Topical immunomodulators (TIMs), including tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, were recently introduced for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.Clinical data show that TIMs are effective in atopic dermatitis, yet do not cause the significant adverse effects associated with topical corticosteroids. Questions remain regarding the place of TIMs as a treatment for atopic dermatitis and how to use them most effectively, from both therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic standpoints. Specifically, two major issues remain unresolved: (i) how TIMs measure up to other therapies, especially topical corticosteroids; and (ii) how members of the TIM drug class compare against each other.Previous research has established that atopic dermatitis has a significant impact on quality of life (QOL) and carries a substantial economic burden. Some studies have also measured the utility of various atopic dermatitis disease states. While there is a need for further research, early economic studies provide evidence that TIMs positively affect the QOL of patients and families. In certain patients, TIMs may be cost effective and have an acceptable incremental cost utility compared with topical corticosteroids.Making cost-effectiveness comparisons between tacrolimus and pimecrolimus is challenging because there are limited head-to-head comparative data. Given currently available efficacy data, the results of one study suggest that tacrolimus may be more cost effective than pimecrolimus in paediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis.The full economic and QOL benefits of both agents are yet to be completely understood. The studies reviewed herein are the first to delineate the pharmacoeconomic benefits of TIMs in atopic dermatitis, and lay the foundation for future analyses. TIMs represent an exciting advance in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Additional research will help determine the proper place of TIMs among the current array of therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis.     

Topical tacrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases

Chronic inflammatory skin disorders, such as atopic eczema, can cause considerable impairment of life quality. Their treatment is mainly driven by systemic or topical glucocorticosteroids which have the risk of many side effects. Recently, immunosuppressive macrolides which act via the inhibition of cytokine expression in T-lymphocytes have been shown to exert good therapeutic potency in inflammatory skin disorders. Cyclosporin, widely used in transplantation medicine, is also effective in psoriasis and atopic eczema but is not suitable for topical treatment. Tacrolimus (FK506) has been found to be 10-100 times more potent than cyclosporin and to penetrate skin much better due to a lower molecular weight. Initial clinical investigations have shown efficacy of topical tacrolimus in patients with atopic eczema. Large multi-centre studies have proven that long-term therapy with 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment reveals effectiveness and safety both in adults and in children with severe atopic eczema. A burning sensation at the site of application is the most frequently observed local side effect. Relevant systemic adverse events were not detected. In Japan and the US, the drug is already licensed for the treatment of atopic eczema. The European admission for the pharmaceutical market is expected in the year 2002. Tacrolimus represents a milestone in topical therapy of inflammatory skin disorders which has so far been dominated by corticosteroid formulations and gives hope for the development of further topical immunosuppressive agents of its class in the future.     

New therapies in diabetes – thiazolidinediones

Introduction: Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin condition and one of the most common, potentially debilitating diseases with increasing incidence.

Areas covered: The complex etiology of AE with multiple systemic and local immunologic and inflammatory responses and interactions between susceptibility genes and environmental factors leading to defects in skin barrier function and eczematous skin lesions is presented. Knowledge of pathogenesis is important for understanding the more innovative treatment approaches discussed.

Expert opinion: Basic therapy consists of hydrating topical treatment and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. For acute eczematous skin lesions, anti-inflammatory treatment consists mainly of topical glucocorticoids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce skin exacerbation, which can be treated by either topical or systemic antimicrobial treatment. Systemic anti-inflammatory therapy is limited to severe cases and consists of systemic steroids, cyclosporine A or mycophenolate mofetil. Novel anti-inflammatory concepts that go beyond corticosteroids are in the early phases of development. There are targeted therapeutic approaches, such as cytokine and chemokine modulators, and it remains to be investigated how effective they will be and what side effects they may carry. Existing treatment modalities such as barrier repair therapy, topical immunosuppressive agents, antiseptic treatment as well as systemic treatment options are discussed.     

Pharmacoeconomics of drug therapy for atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is an increasingly prevalent common childhood disease. While the majority of patients have mild disease, atopic dermatitis can cause considerable distress to patients and their caregivers, with significant social and financial cost to families. With a prevalence of 15 - 20% in Western countries, atopic dermatitis also has a considerable health and societal cost to the community. Many new treatments have been shown to be therapeutically effective, particularly in severe disease, including cyclosporin A (Neoral^®, Novartis AG), interferon, tacrolimus (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) and iv. immunoglobulin. These are expensive when compared to standard treatments like emollients and topical corticosteroids and have significant adverse effects that limit their use. Additional costs related to monitoring are incurred and the long-term safety of these treatments is yet to be determined. However, an advantage over more traditional therapies is their ability to produce benefits even after treatment ceases. Treatments that produce long-term remissions have a greater likelihood of being cost-effective. With monetary constraints on healthcare and the importance governments place on reducing drug costs, economic evaluations are becoming an increasingly important factor for drug acceptance. Those evaluating cost-effectiveness should pay particular attention to the potential reduction in indirect and intangible costs. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of cost-effectiveness studies in atopic eczema and this needs to be addressed with some urgency.     

Tacrolimus ointment: new preparation. Too many unknowns

(1) Drug therapy for exacerbations of atopic dermatitis (atopic eczema) should only be considered when simple measures and emollients are inadequate. The first-line option is a topical corticosteroid with a level of potency appropriate for the affected site and the patient's age. (2) Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant used orally or parenterally to prevent graft rejection, is now marketed in France as an ointment, in two dose strengths, for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. It is approved for use when topical corticosteroids fail, in patients aged at least two years. (3) According to a comparative trial in adults, tacrolimus, when used as a first-line treatment, is no more effective than a class II (strong) topical corticosteroid. Several clinical trials show that it is better than the excipient in both adults and children. The 0.1% strength seems to be slightly more active than the 0.03% strength in adults. (4) It is not known whether tacrolimus is effective after topical corticosteroid failure. (5) In comparative trials the main systemic adverse events in patients using tacrolimus ointment were flu-like syndromes and headache. Local adverse events included burning or pruritus at the site of application in about 50% of patients. These local effects are due to both the excipient and tacrolimus. (6) Severe skin infections and skin cancer cannot be ruled out as serious side effects. (7) Tacrolimus uptake through the skin exposes patients to systemic adverse effects and drug interactions. (8) In practice, patients with atopic dermatitis, however severe, have no reason to use tacrolimus, at least pending studies showing it is effective after topical corticosteroid failure.     

Pharmacoeconomics of drug therapy for atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is an increasingly prevalent common childhood disease. While the majority of patients have mild disease, atopic dermatitis can cause considerable distress to patients and their caregivers, with significant social and financial cost to families. With a prevalence of 15 - 20% in Western countries, atopic dermatitis also has a considerable health and societal cost to the community. Many new treatments have been shown to be therapeutically effective, particularly in severe disease, including cyclosporin A (Neoral, Novartis AG), interferon, tacrolimus (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) and iv. immunoglobulin. These are expensive when compared to standard treatments like emollients and topical corticosteroids and have significant adverse effects that limit their use. Additional costs related to monitoring are incurred and the long-term safety of these treatments is yet to be determined. However, an advantage over more traditional therapies is their ability to produce benefits even after treatment ceases. Treatments that produce long-term remissions have a greater likelihood of being cost-effective. With monetary constraints on healthcare and the importance governments place on reducing drug costs, economic evaluations are becoming an increasingly important factor for drug acceptance. Those evaluating cost-effectiveness should pay particular attention to the potential reduction in indirect and intangible costs. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of cost-effectiveness studies in atopic eczema and this needs to be addressed with some urgency.     

Emerging drugs for neuropathic pain

Importance of the field: Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin condition and one of the most common, potentially debilitating diseases with increasing incidence.

Areas covered in this review: The complex etiology of AE with multiple systemic and local immunologic and inflammatory responses and interactions between susceptibility genes and environmental factors leading to defects in skin barrier function and eczematous skin lesions is presented. Knowledge of pathogenesis is important for understanding the more innovative treatment approaches discussed.

What the reader will gain: Basic therapy consists of hydrating topical treatment and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. For acute eczematous skin lesions, anti-inflammatory treatment consists mainly of topical glucocorticoids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus). Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce skin exacerbation, which can be treated by either topical or systemic antimicrobial treatment. Systemic anti-inflammatory therapy is limited to severe cases and consists of systemic steroids, cyclosporine A or mycophenolate mofetil. Novel anti-inflammatory concepts that go beyond corticosteroids are in the early phases of development. There are targeted therapeutic approaches, such as cytokine and chemokine modulators and it remains to be investigated how effective they will be and what side effects they may carry.

Take home message: Existing treatment modalities such as barrier repair therapy, topical immunosuppressive agents, antiseptic treatment as well as systemic treatment options are discussed. The review aims to summarize the most recent findings of more innovative treatment approaches such as modulation of cytokines or chemokines, modulation of T-cell responses or anti-IgE therapy.     

Topical steroid allergy and dependence

(1) When a topical corticosteroid fails to control a skin condition, the first explanations are usually a wrong diagnosis or inadequate drug potency; however, allergy or dependence should also be considered. (2) Contact dermatitis due to a topical corticosteroid is difficult to diagnose as the symptoms are often mixed with those of the underlying skin disease. Allergy to topical corticosteroids can mimic acute eczema or localised acute swelling. The most commonly affected areas are the legs, hands and face. (3) Risk factors include long term, frequent application of topical steroids by patients with leg ulcers, stasis dermatitis, atopic dermatitis or contact dermatitis (especially on the hands). The diagnostic performance of skin tests is controversial. (4) Several studies and other lines of evidence point to rare allergic cross-reactions to topical corticosteroids, undermining the usefulness of switching to a second topical corticosteroid. (5) Sometimes, especially when skin tests are negative, the problem seems to be dependence to the topical corticosteroid rather than allergy. (6) In practice, stopping the steroid treatment completely is sometimes the best solution, although this may prove difficult.     

Recent advances in treatment strategies for atopic dermatitis

A wide range of different therapeutic regimens are used for atopic dermatitis. Although many treatment modalities are well established worldwide among clinicians, only the minority of these therapy recommendations are based on results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). To close the gap between such 'generally' recommended therapies and therapies that are based on data from controlled trials, this review focuses not only on the pharmacological and clinical aspects of the currently proven agents, but also on the advantages and disadvantages of therapies that have not yet been completely tested.A review of the available literature concerning the pharmacological profile and also the level of evidence of therapeutic efficacy of all currently known topical and systemic agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis reveals a large gap between the knowledge concerning the pharmacological action in vitro and the evidence of clinical efficacy in many cases.We agree with the conclusion of previous reviews that numerous therapies for atopic dermatitis urgently require more independent RCTs and especially comparative trials (e.g. corticosteroids vs calcineurin inhibitors). These are required in order to facilitate the choice of therapeutic strategy for the individual treatment of atopic dermatitis, with its broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and potential complications in adult patients and, particularly, in children.Finally, we also review preclinical trials with several new drugs. Immunomodulators appear to promise a new dimension for the future of therapy for atopic dermatitis, especially for severe and otherwise refractory forms or as alternatives to corticosteroids, that is, to treat facial atopic eczema without the risk of adverse effects.     

Practical issues and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease with multisystem involvement. Diagnosis is generally easy to establish from the characteristic clinical and radiographic features. In India and other developing countries, tuberculosis is the closest clinical mimic and needs to be excluded before therapy for sarcoidosis is instituted. Tuberculin anergy and histopathological demonstration of characteristic compact granulomas help in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids constitute the mainstay of therapy for symptomatic pulmonary and most other forms of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis. Asymptomatic disease does not require any treatment, but milder forms may be treated with topical corticosteroids and symptomatic therapy. Alternative drugs such as cytotoxic agents, hydroxychloroquine and other agents are used either alone or in combination for the treatment of relapses and recurrences and refractoriness or in the presence of complications of corticosteroids. Treatment is usually continued for about a year, but it may need to be prolonged in patients with disease that persists and the response to therapy is delayed.     

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EE) is a clinico-pathological entity recognized with increased frequency in children and adults. It is an atopic disease involving ingested and inhaled allergens. A pathological eosinophilic infiltrate is diagnosed by finding ≥ 15 eosinophils per high-powered field on oesophageal mucosal biopsies. This infiltrate may result in a narrowed oesophageal lumen. It does not involve the stomach or duodenum. Children commonly present with abdominal pain, vomiting and dysphagia. Presentation in adults is with dysphagia, heartburn, chest pain or impaction of a food bolus in the oesophagus. There is often a history of allergy (asthma, hay fever, eczema). A male predominance (70% in adults) is unexplained. Distinctive endoscopic features are linear furrows, mucosal rings and white papules, and the narrowed lumen may be appreciated. Although EE and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are separate entities, there is a significant overlap of the conditions. Treatment options include nonpharmacological approaches including an elimination or elemental diet, and/ or medications, chiefly with corticosteroids. The topical administration of fluticasone propionate has been demonstrated to improve symptoms and mobilize the pathological infiltrate of eosinophils. There has been a variable effect with the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast and promising early results with mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5. The long-term efficacy of topical corticosteroids has not been well studied and most patients experience recurrent symptoms when treatment is completed. Currently, repeated short courses of topical corticosteroids are utilized. Acid suppression by a proton pump inhibitor may be considered in view of the overlap between EE and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.     

Tacrolimus: focusing on atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus ointment is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis. As a calcineurin inhibitor, it works through the FK-binding protein, inhibiting calcineurin and preventing dephosphorylation of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT). Systemic absorption from the drug is minimal, allowing a favorable safety profile. In head-to-head clinical trials with pimecrolimus, tacrolimus proved to be a more effective treatment. Tacrolimus ointment has also been compared to standard topical cortico-steroid treatments and is equally effective if not superior to several topical steroids. Overall, tacrolimus ointment is a safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis and can be used as an adjunctive treatment to standard management with topical corticosteroids.     

Use and abuse of topical corticosteroids in infections of the skin and related structures

Topical corticosteroids have improved the management of many inflammatory skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. However, these medications are associated with certain adverse effects that are potentially serious. The potent anti-inflammatory actions of these drugs increase susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections, and therefore may preclude them from use when infection is the known cause of the disease. In addition, children may be more vulnerable than adults to systemic effects of topical corticosteroids because percutaneous absorption is proportionately greater. These are important considerations, and physicians need to weigh and compare the risks and benefits associated with these medications before initiating treatment. This involves an appreciation of which patient populations are at high risk, which skin conditions are incompatible with topical corticosteroid therapy, and which alternative nonsteroidal medications are effective in treating inflammatory skin diseases.     

Pimecrolimus: new preparation. Me-too: too many risks, not beneficial enough in atopic dermatitis

(1) Symptomatic treatment of atopic dermatitis is initially based on simple measures and moisturising creams. Topical corticosteroids are reserved for treatment of inflammatory exacerbations. (2) After topical tacrolimus, marketing authorisation has been granted in France for a second topical immunosuppressant, pimecrolimus, as a short-term symptomatic treatment for atopic dermatitis in children from the age of two years, and intermittently for long-term prevention of new exacerbations. (3) Short-term treatment with pimecrolimus has been tested in three trials in children with mild to moderate dermatitis (against the excipient), in one adult trial against the excipient, and in one dose-finding study in adults that included a group treated with topical corticosteroids. (4) Longer term treatment periods of 6 to 12 months have been tested in two trials versus excipient in children, and two adult trials, one versus moderately active topical corticosteroids. (5) These trials show that pimecrolimus works better than the excipient, but not nearly as well as moderately active topical corticosteroids. Pimecrolimus has not been compared with topical corticosteroids in children, the age group most vulnerable to atopic dermatitis. (6) The commonest adverse effects observed in clinical trials were local and included a burning sensation at the site of application and skin infections. Systemic adverse effects (mainly infections) were most marked in infants. Long-term risks, especially the risk of skin cancer, have not been assessed. (7) In practice, the reference treatment for exacerbations of atopic dermatitis is a topical corticosteroid; in children, it seems best to begin with a weak preparation. There is no reason to use pimecrolimus, which is less active than topical corticosteroids and whose potential long-term adverse effects, especially in children, are unknown.     

Formulary review of therapeutic alternatives for atopic dermatitis: focus on pimecrolimus

OBJECTIVE: Atopic dermatitis (AD), often called eczema, is characterized by intense pruritus, erythema, dry skin, and inflammation. The condition is chronic and relapsing, and often occurs in patients with a family history of the atopic triad (asthma, allergic rhinitis, and AD). Use of topical steroids has been the mainstay of medical treatment for AD. Steroid-free treatments for AD, with a more favorable safety profile, have become available within the past 2 years. Tacrolimus ointment, a topical immunomodulator, became available in early 2001 and is indicated for moderate-to-severe AD. A similar but highly skinselective cytokine inhibitor, pimecrolimus cream 1%, became available in March 2002. Pimecrolimus is indicated for mild-to-moderate AD. The objective of this article is to review the key characteristics that differentiate pimecrolimus from steroids and tacrolimus in the treatment of AD. METHODS: Using secondary resources, the clinical aspects and conventional treatment strategies for AD are reviewed as are the pivotal clinical studies with pimecrolimus and literature on quality of life and economic burden of disease for AD patients and families. SUMMARY: Pimecrolimus is an effective, steroid-sparing therapy for mild-tomoderate AD. Early treatment prevents flares, the agent works quickly to reduce signs and symptoms of more advanced AD, and it is safe and appropriate for intermittent long-term therapy. Pimecrolimus has fewer side effects than topical steroids and a better side-effect profile than tacrolimus. It can also be used as a first-line therapy. In studies with patients aged 2 to 17 years, it has been shown to be particularly effective in improving eczema of the face and neck, and its use may improve quality of life for many patients, especially children. A single-strength dose (1%) is safe and medically beneficial for pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients. The direct drug cost of pimecrolimus compares favorably with tacrolimus, but it is significantly more expensive than generic topical steroid creams.     

Topical [symbol: see text] tacrolimus--a role in atopic dermatitis?

Conventional treatment of atopic dermatitis includes the regular, frequent use of emollients, and intermittent application of topical corticosteroids to control acute 'flares'. [symbol: see text] Tacrolimus (pronounced ta-kro-li-mus), which is available for systemic use for the prevention of organ rejection following allogenic liver and kidney transplantation, is now formulated as an immunosuppressant ointment (Protopic-Fujisawa). This is licensed for use in adults and children aged 2 years and over with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis inadequately responsive to conventional therapy. Promotion states that, in these groups, tacrolimus is "at least as effective as topical steroids" and "without the potential side effects of conventional therapy". Here we consider the place of tacrolimus ointment in the management of atopic dermatitis.     

Topical steroids for atopic dermatitis in primary care

Atopic dermatitis is very common. In most instances, the condition is relatively mild and can be managed in primary care. Topical corticosteroids are the standard therapy for controlling acute 'flares' of dermatitis. However, poor communication between doctors and patients often results in suboptimal use of such therapy. Here, we review the efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. We discuss their optimal use in primary care, and the advice and information that patients or parents of children need when using such treatment.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with topical corticosteroids in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: review of randomised, double-blind clinical studies conducted in Japan

Tacrolimus (FK506) ointment is widely used in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. The drug exerts its action by down-regulating antigen-specific T-cell activities and associated proinflammatory cytokine production. A number of clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment compared with vehicle or topical corticosteroids in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. These studies have suggested that topical tacrolimus has a rapid onset of action and exerts sustained therapeutic effects, with an efficacy similar to that of moderate to potent topical corticosteroids, but without causing skin atrophy. Two phase III randomised, controlled clinical trials have been conducted in Japanese adult patients with atopic dermatitis to compare the efficacy and safety of topical 0.1% tacrolimus with topical corticosteroid ointments. In the first study, patients with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis on the trunk and extremities were randomised to 3 weeks of treatment with topical 0.1% tacrolimus or the mid-potency topical corticosteroid 0.12% betamethasone valerate. Over 90% of the patients in each study group experienced at least a moderate improvement at the end of the study. In the second study, patients with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis on the head or neck were randomised to 1 week of treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus or the mild-potency corticosteroid 0.1% alclometasone dipropionate. Significantly greater improvements in individual symptom scores were observed with topical tacrolimus compared with alclometasone dipropionate, with overall global improvement at 1 week being statistically superior with tacrolimus. Furthermore, in a long-term open-label study involving 568 patients, at least a moderate global improvement in symptoms was observed in 85% of patients at 6 weeks, increasing to 91% at both 26 weeks and 52 weeks; this rate was maintained throughout the 2-year duration of the study. 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was considered to be safe in the majority of patients. The most prevalent adverse reactions were local application site irritations, which generally resolved with continued therapy. In summary, these findings suggest that 0.1% tacrolimus ointment is an effective and safe nonsteroidal alternative therapy for adult patients with atopic dermatitis.