Outcomes of short-duration antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis C positive donor kidney transplants

Trials describing 4- to 12-week courses of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission from infected donors to uninfected kidney transplant recipients (D+/R− transplants) may be limited in “real-world” application by costs and delayed access to DAAs. We previously reported HCV transmission of 13% among D+/R− transplants with 2- to 4-day pangenotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) perioperative prophylaxis, where one patient with HCV transmission was a nonresponder to first-line full-course DAA. Here, we report new data with a 7-day prophylaxis protocol (N = 50), as well as cumulative treatment and outcome data on all HCV D+/R− transplants (N = 102). Overall, nine patients (9/102; 9%; 95% CI: 5%–16%) developed HCV transmission, with a significant decline noted in the 7-day group (2/50; 4%; 95% CI: 0%–13%) compared with 2- to 4-day prophylaxis (7/52; 13%; 95% CI: 5%–25%). All patients with HCV transmission achieved sustained virologic response post full-course therapy (including one nonresponder from initial trial). A 1:1 matched analysis (N = 102) with contemporary HCV D−/R− transplants (controls) showed that although the pretransplant wait time was significantly shorter for D+/R− compared with D−/R− (mean: 1.8 vs. 4.4 years; p < .001), there were no differences in infections, rejection, development of de novo donor-specific antibody, or transplant outcomes up to 6 months of transplant.     

Short‐term outcomes of deceased donor renal transplants of HCV uninfected recipients from HCV seropositive nonviremic donors and viremic donors in the era of direct‐acting antivirals

The United States opioid use epidemic over the past decade has coincided with an increase in hepatitis C virus  (HCV) positive donors. Using propensity score matching, and the Organ Procurement Transplant Network data files from January 2015 to June 2019, we analyzed the short‐term outcomes of adult deceased donor kidney transplants of HCV uninfected recipients with two distinct groups of HCV positive donors (HCV seropositive, nonviremic n = 352 and viremic n = 196) compared to those performed using HCV uninfected donors (n = 36 934). Compared to the reference group, the transplants performed using HCV seropositive, nonviremic and viremic donors experienced a lower proportion of delayed graft function (35.2 vs 18.9%; P < .001 [HCV seropositive, nonviremic donors] and 36.2 vs 16.8% ;  P < .001[HCV viremic donors]). The recipients of HCV viremic donors had better allograft function at 6 months posttransplant (eGFR [54.1 vs 68.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .004]. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in the overall graft failure risk at 12 months posttransplant by propensity score matched multivariable Cox proportional analysis (HR =  0.60, 95% CI  0.23 to  1.29 [HCV seropositive, nonviremic donors] and HR =  0.85, 95% CI 0.25 to  2.96 [HCV viremic donors]). Further studies are required to determine the long‐term outcomes of these transplants and address unanswered questions regarding the use of HCV viremic donors.     

COVID‐19 in elderly kidney transplant recipients

The SARS‐Cov‐2 infection disease (COVID‐19) pandemic has posed at risk the kidney transplant (KT) population, particularly the elderly recipients. From March 12 until April 4, 2020, we diagnosed COVID‐19 in 16 of our 324 KT patients aged ≥65 years old (4.9%). Many of them had had contact with healthcare facilities in the month prior to infection. Median time of symptom onset to admission was 7 days. All presented with fever and all but one with pneumonia. Up to 33% showed renal graft dysfunction. At infection diagnosis, mTOR inhibitors or mycophenolate were withdrawn. Tacrolimus was withdrawn in 70%. The main treatment combination was hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. A subset of patients was treated with anti‐retroviral and tocilizumab. Short‐term fatality rate was 50% at a median time since admission of 3 days. Those who died were more frequently obese, frail, and had underlying heart disease. Although a higher respiratory rate was observed at admission in nonsurvivors, symptoms at presentation were similar between both groups. Patients who died were more anemic, lymphopenic, and showed higher D‐dimer, C‐reactive protein, and IL‐6 at their first tests. COVID‐19 is frequent among the elderly KT population and associates a very early and high mortality rate.     

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis after kidney transplantation from HCV‐viremic donors to HCV‐negative recipients: A unique complication in the DAA era

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) posttransplantation can lead to graft failure and death. In the era of direct acting antiviral therapy (DAA), several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of transplanting hepatitis C virus (HCV)–positive allografts into HCV‐negative recipients. In this case series, we present two cases of HCV‐negative recipients who underwent kidney transplantation from viremic donors and developed FCH. Both patients presented after transplant with abnormal liver function tests and HCV viral loads of greater than 100 000 000 IU/mL. FCH was diagnosed by histology and/or clinical data. Both patients were started on DAA therapy within 24 hours of admission with improvement in LFTs. One patient has undetectable HCV 12 weeks after completing treatment and the other patient has undetectable HCV after completing DAA treatment. The introduction of DAAs has changed the landscape of solid organ transplantation with the potential to expand the donor pool and increase access to organs. While HCV viremic organs have tremendous potential to increase access to a scarce resource, FCH is a potentially fatal complication and therefore clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for this unique complication.     

Direct‐acting antiviral agent–based regimen for HCV recurrence after combined liver‐kidney transplantation: Results from the ANRS CO23 CUPILT study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with reduced patient survival following combined liver‐kidney transplantation (LKT). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of second‐generation direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) in this difficult‐to‐treat population. The ANRS CO23 “Compassionate use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation” (CUPILT) study is a prospective cohort including transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection treated with DAAs. The present work focused on recipients with recurrent infection following LKT. The study population included 23 patients. All patients received at least one NS5B inhibitor (sofosbuvir) in their antiviral regimen an average of 90 months after LKT. Ninety‐six percent of recipients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) at week 12 (SVR12). In terms of tolerance, 39% of recipients presented with at least one serious adverse event. None of the patients experienced acute rejection during therapy and there were no deaths during follow‐up. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased significantly from baseline to the end of therapy. However, this study did not show that the decline in GFR persisted over time or that it was directly related to DAAs. The DAA‐based regimen is well tolerated with excellent results in terms of efficacy. It will become the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent HCV following LKT.     

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C–infected donors to hepatitis C–negative recipients: Single center experience

Our aim was to evaluate the safety of transplanting kidneys from HCV‐infected donors in HCV‐uninfected recipients. Data collected from 53 recipients in a single center, observational study included donor and recipient characteristics, liver and kidney graft function, new infections and de novo donor‐specific antibodies and renal histology. Treatment with a direct‐acting antiviral regimen was initiated when HCV RNA was detected. The mean ± SD age of recipients was 53 ± 11 years, 34% were female, 19% and 79% of recipients were white and African American, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) time between transplant and treatment initiation was 76 (IQR: 68‐88) days. All 53 recipients became viremic (genotype: 1a [N = 34], 1b [N = 1], 2 [N = 3], and 3 [N = 15]). The majority (81%) of recipients did not experience clinically significant increases (>3 times higher than upper limit of the normal value) in aminotransferase levels and their HCV RNA levels were in the 5 to 6 log range. One patient developed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with complete resolution. All recipients completed antiviral treatment and 100% were HCV RNA–negative and achieved 12‐week sustained virologic response. The estimated GFRs at end of treatment and 12‐week posttreatment were 67 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m² and 67 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Four recipients developed acute rejection. Kidney transplantation from HCV‐infected donors to HCV‐negative recipients should be considered in all eligible patients.     

Cost‐effectiveness of using kidneys from hepatitis C nucleic acid test–positive donors for transplantation in hepatitis C–negative recipients

Kidneys from deceased donors who are hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid test positive are infrequently used for transplantation in HCV‐negative patients due to concerns about disease transmission. With the development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV, there is now potential to use these kidneys in HCV‐negative candidates. However, the high cost of DAAs poses a challenge to adoption of this strategy. We created a Markov model to examine the cost‐effectiveness of using deceased donors infected with HCV for kidney transplantation in uninfected waitlist candidates. In the primary analysis, this strategy was cost saving and improved health outcomes compared to remaining on the waitlist for an additional 2 or more years to receive a HCV‐negative transplant. The strategy was also cost‐effective with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of $56 018 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) from the payer perspective, and $4647 per QALY from the societal perspective, compared to remaining on the waitlist for 1 additional year. The results were consistent in 1‐way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We conclude that the use of kidneys from deceased donors with HCV infection is likely to lead to improved clinical outcomes at reduced cost for HCV‐negative transplant candidates.     

Cost‐effectiveness of hepatitis C–positive donor kidney transplantation for hepatitis C–negative recipients with concomitant direct‐acting antiviral therapy

Pilot studies suggest that transplanting hepatitis C virus (HCV)–positive donor (D+) kidneys into HCV‐negative renal transplant (RT) recipients (R?), then treating HCV with direct‐acting antivirals (DAA) is clinically feasible. To determine whether this is a cost‐effective approach, a decision tree model was developed to analyze costs and effectiveness over a 5‐year time frame between 2 choices: RT using a D+/R? strategy compared to continuing dialysis and waiting for a HCV‐negative donor (D?/R?). The strategy of accepting a HCV+ organ then treating HCV was slightly more effective and substantially less expensive and resulted in an expected 4.8 years of life (YOL) with a cost of ≈$138 000 compared to an expected 4.7 YOL with a cost of ≈$329 000 for the D?/R? strategy. The D+/R? strategy remained dominant after sensitivity analyses including the difference in RT death probabilities or acute rejection probabilities between using D+ vs D? kidney; time that D?/R? patients waited for RT; dialysis death probabilities while waitlisted for RT in the D?/R? strategy; DAA therapy expected cure rate; costs of transplant, immunosuppressives, DAA therapy, dialysis, or acute rejection. The D+/R? strategy followed by treatment with DAA is less costly and slightly more effective compared to the D?/R? strategy.     

Pancreas transplantation from hepatitis C viremic donors to uninfected recipients

Despite utilization of hepatitis C viremic organs for hepatitis C naïve recipients (HCV D+/R-) in other solid organ transplants, HCV viremic pancreata remain an unexplored source of donor organs. This study reports the first series of HCV D+/R- pancreas transplants. HCV D+/R- had shorter waitlist times compared to HCV D-/R-, waiting a mean of 16 days from listing for HCV-positive organs. HCV D+/R- had a lower match allocation sequence than HCV D-/R-, and this correlated with receipt of organs with a lower Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) score. All HCV D+/R- had excellent graft function with a mean follow-up of 438 days and had undetectable HCV RNA levels by a mean of 23 days after initiation of HCV-directed therapy. The rates of infectious complications, reoperation, readmission, rejection, and length of stay were not impacted by donor HCV status. A national review of potential ideal pancreas donors found that 37% of ideal HCV-negative pancreas allografts were transplanted, compared to only 5% of ideal HCV-positive pancreas allografts. The results of the current study demonstrate the safety of accepting HCV-positive pancreata for HCV-naïve recipients and advocates for increased utilization of ideal HCV-positive pancreas allografts.     

Immune‐mediated graft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus treated with direct‐acting antiviral therapy

Interferon treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) can result in immune‐mediated graft dysfunction (IGD). The occurrence of, risk factors for, and outcomes of IGD with direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy have not been reported. We conducted a multicenter study of HCV+LT recipients who did or did not develop DAA‐IGD (1 case: 2 controls—33 vs 66). Among all treated between 2014 and 2016, DAA‐IGD occurred in 3.4% (33/978). IGD occurred only after treatment completion (76.0 [IQR, 47.0;176]). Among those treated, 48% had plasma cell hepatitis, 36% acute cellular rejection, 6% chronic rejection, and 9% combined findings. Median time to liver enzyme resolution was 77.5 days (IQR, 31.5;126). After diagnosis, hospitalizations, steroid‐induced hyperglycemia, and infection occurred in a higher percentage of cases vs controls (33% vs 7.5%, 21% vs 1.5%, 9% vs 0%; all P < .05). Only one IGD patient died and none required retransplant. A multivariate regression analysis found that liver enzyme elevations during and soon after DAA therapy completion correlated with subsequent IGD. In conclusion, while DAA‐IGD is uncommon, liver enzyme elevations during or after DAA therapy may be a sign of impending IGD. These indicators should guide clinicians to diagnose and treat IGD early before the more deleterious later clinical presentation.     

Two distinct cases with COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients

The fatality of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is precipitously increased in patients with underlying comorbidities or elderly people. Kidney transplant (KT) recipients are one of the vulnerable populations for infection. COVID‐19 infection in KT recipients might be a complicated and awkward situation, but there has been a lack of reports concerning this group. Herein, we demonstrated two distinct cases with different clinical progress. The first case was a 36‐year‐old man who underwent KT 3 years ago. He was diagnosed with COVID‐19 expressing relevant symptoms. Following administration of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine with reduced immunosuppressant, he recovered from COVID‐19. However, the unexpected fluctuations in tacrolimus trough levels needed to be managed because of drug‐to‐drug interaction. The second case was developed in a 56‐year‐old man without any symptoms. He received a second KT from an ABO‐incompatible donor 8 years ago. He was diagnosed with COVID‐19 by screening due to exposure history. During the hospitalization period, the chest infiltrative lesion showed a wax and wane, but he successfully recovered by administration of hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin. These apparently different cases suggest that assertive screening and management could improve the clinical course. In addition, antiviral agents should be used cautiously, especially in patients on calcineurin inhibitors.     

COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients

There is minimal information on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in immunocompromised individuals. We have studied 10 patients treated at 12 adult care hospitals. Ten kidney transplant recipients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) by polymerase chain reaction, and 9 were admitted. The median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 47‐67), 60% were male, 40% Caucasian, and 30% Black/African American. Median time from transplant to COVID‐19 testing was 2822 days (IQR 1272‐4592). The most common symptom was fever, followed by cough, myalgia, chills, and fatigue. The most common chest X‐ray and computed tomography abnormality was multifocal patchy opacities. Three patients had no abnormal findings. Leukopenia was seen in 20% of patients, and allograft function was stable in 50% of patients. Nine patients were on tacrolimus and a mycophenolic antimetabolite, and 70% were on prednisone. Hospitalized patients had their antimetabolite agent stopped. All hospitalized patients received hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Three patients died (30%), and 5 (50%) developed acute kidney injury. Kidney transplant recipients infected with COVID‐19 should be monitored closely in the setting of lowered immunosuppression. Most individuals required hospitalization and presenting symptoms were similar to those of nontransplant individuals.     

COVID-19 severity in kidney transplant recipients is similar to nontransplant patients with similar comorbidities

Higher rates of severe COVID-19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to nontransplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score-matching method to compare survival and severe disease-free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit [ICU]) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and nontransplant control patients between February 26 and May 22, 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID-19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease, and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3–73.1) in three French transplant centers. After a median follow-up of 13 days (7–30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow-up of 8.5 days (2–14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched nontransplant patients with respective 30-day survival of 62.9% and 71% (p = .38) and severe disease-free 30-day survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p = .91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID-19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.     

Long-term shedding of viable SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19

The exact duration of viable SARS-CoV-2 shedding in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unclear. Here, we retrospectively investigated this issue using cell cultures of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples (n = 40) obtained from 16 KTRs with symptomatic COVID-19 up to 39 days from symptom onset. A length of viable SARS-CoV-2 shedding >3 weeks from the onset of symptoms was identified in four KTRs (25%). These results suggest that a significant proportion of KTRs can shed viable SARS-CoV-2 for at least 3 weeks, which may favor the emergence of new variants. Based on these data, we recommend prolonging the isolation of KTRs with COVID-19 until negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing.     

Ciprofloxacin for BK viremia prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: Results of a prospective,double‐blind,randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

In kidney transplantation, BK virus infection has historically resulted in high rates of graft dysfunction and graft loss. Unlike other opportunistic infections, no therapies have been shown to prevent BK. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ciprofloxacin for the prevention of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Two hundred kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial comparing a 3‐month course of ciprofloxacin (n = 133) vs placebo (n = 67) for the prevention of BK viremia. The primary endpoint of BK viremia at month 6 posttransplant occurred in 25 (18.8%) patients in the ciprofloxacin group and 5 (7.5%) in the placebo group (P = .03). Higher rates of BK viremia (23.3% vs 11.9%; P = .06) and BK nephropathy (5.8% vs 1.5%; P = .26) remained at 12 months in the ciprofloxacin group. Ciprofloxacin use was associated with a significantly higher rate of fluoroquinolone‐resistant gram‐negative infections (83.3% vs 50%; P = .04). A 3‐month course of ciprofloxacin was ineffective at preventing BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients and was associated with an increased risk of fluoroquinolone‐resistant infections. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01789203.     

The impact of direct‐acting antiviral agents on liver and kidney transplant costs and outcomes

Direct‐acting antiviral medications (DAAs) have revolutionized care for hepatitis C positive (HCV+) liver (LT) and kidney (KT) transplant recipients. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry data were integrated with national pharmaceutical claims (2007‐2016) to identify HCV treatments before January 2014 (pre‐DAA) and after (post‐DAA), stratified by donor (D) and recipient (R) serostatus and payer. Pre‐DAA, 18% of HCV+ LT recipients were treated within 3 years and without differences by donor serostatus or payer. Post‐DAA, only 6% of D‐/R+ recipients, 19.8% of D+/R+ recipients with public insurance, and 11.3% with private insurance were treated within 3 years (P < .0001). LT recipients treated for HCV pre‐DAA experienced higher rates of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] _1.341.85_2.10, P < .0001) and death (aHR _1.471.68_1.91, P < .0001). Post‐DAA, HCV treatment was not associated with death (aHR _0.340.67_1.32, P = .25) or graft failure (aHR _0.320.64_1.26, P = .20) in D+R+ LT recipients. Treatment increased in D+R+ KT recipients (5.5% pre‐DAA vs 12.9% post‐DAA), but did not differ by payer status. DAAs reduced the risk of death after D+/R+ KT by 57% (_0.190.43_0.95, P = .04) and graft loss by 46% (_0.270.54_1.07, P = .08). HCV treatment with DAAs appears to improve HCV+ LT and KT outcomes; however, access to these medications appears limited in both LT and KT recipients.     

Novel coronavirus 2019 pneumonia in a kidney transplant recipient

The COVID‐19 pandemic is spreading worldwide and the impact of the disease in transplant patients is evolving. In this case report, we presented a 63‐year‐old female kidney transplant recipient who presented with dyspnea and cough and was diagnosed with COVID‐19 pneumonia. On the fourth day of admission, the patient's condition worsened. Therefore, the immunosuppressive medications were discontinued, and hydrocortisone was started. The patient died on the fifth day.     

Transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive,nucleic acid test negative donor kidneys to HCV negative patients frequently results in seroconversion but not HCV viremia

Anecdotal reports have suggested that transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive (Ab+)/nucleic acid test negative (NAT?) donor kidneys into HCV negative recipients is not associated with HCV transmission. We reviewed our center's outcomes of 32 HCV negative patients who received kidney allografts from 25 donors who were HCV Ab+/NAT?. The mean recipient age was 56.9 ± 12.1 years and the mean donor age was 41.5 ± 14 years, with a median Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 68%. Twelve donors (48%) met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk status. All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid maintenance immunosuppression. With a mean follow‐up posttransplant of 10 ± 2.7 months, 1‐ and 3‐ month serum creatinine levels were 1.7 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 0.4, respectively, and patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 97%, respectively. Fourteen patients (44%) seroconverted and became HCV Ab+ posttransplant. However, all 32 patients were HCV RNA negative at 1‐ and 3‐ months posttransplant, and 27 and 8 patients tested at 6‐ and 12‐months posttransplant, respectively, remain HCV RNA negative. In conclusion, transplantation of HCV Ab+/NAT? kidneys to HCV negative recipients frequently causes HCV Ab seroconversion but not HCV viremia.     

Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir‐Based Antiviral Therapy to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Kidney Transplantation

There is no approved therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after kidney transplantation, and no data regarding the use of new‐generation direct antiviral agents (DAAs) have been published so far. The aims of this pilot study were to assess the efficacy and safety of an interferon‐free sofosbuvir‐based regimen to treat chronic HCV infection in kidney transplant recipients. Twenty‐five kidney transplant recipients with chronic HCV infection were given, for 12 (n = 19) or 24 weeks (n = 6), sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (n = 3); sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir (n = 4); sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 6); sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, with (n = 1) or without ribavirin (n = 9); and sofosbuvir plus pegylated‐interferon plus ribavirin (n = 1). A rapid virological response, defined by undetectable viremia at week 4 after starting DAA therapy, was observed in 22 of the 25 patients (88%). At the end of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in all patients. At 4 and 12 weeks after completing DAA therapy, all had a sustained virological response. The tolerance to anti‐HCV therapy was excellent and no adverse event was observed. A significant decrease in calcineurin inhibitor levels was observed after HCV clearance. New‐generation oral DAAs are efficient and safe to treat HCV infection after kidney transplantation.     

Monitoring of CMV‐specific cell‐mediated immunity with a commercial ELISA‐based interferon‐γ release assay in kidney transplant recipients treated with antithymocyte globulin

Monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐specific cell‐mediated immunity (CMV‐CMI) may be useful for individualizing valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis after kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a commercial ELISA‐based interferon (IFN)‐γ release assay (QTF‐CMV) from posttransplant months 2‐5 (362 points) in 120 CMV‐seropositive KT recipients that received antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy and VGCV prophylaxis (median of 92 days). Forty‐seven patients (39.3%) had CMV infection after discontinuation of prophylaxis. The QTF‐CMV assay was reactive, nonreactive, and indeterminate in 264 (72.9%), 90 (24.9%), and 8 points (2.2%). The QTF‐CMV assay at prophylaxis discontinuation exhibited suboptimal accuracy for predicting protective CMV‐CMI (sensitivity: 77.4%; specificity: 34.3%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 64.1%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 50.0%), with no differences in 1‐year CMV infection rates between patients with negative (nonreactive or indeterminate) or reactive results (45.8% vs 36.1%; P = .244). Specificity and PPV to predict protective CMV‐CMI improved by elevating the IFN‐γ cutoff value to 1.13 IU/mL (65.7% and 71.4%) and 7.0 IU/mL (85.7% and 76.2%), although NPVs decreased. The QTF‐CMV assay as per manufacturer's interpretative criteria performed poorly to predict protection from CMV infection following discontinuation of VGCV prophylaxis among ATG‐treated CMV‐seropositive KT recipients. This performance is slightly improved by modifying the IFN‐γ positivity threshold.