Predictors and 3‐year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting

BackgroundThere are few predictors of decreased fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) after left main (LM) crossover stenting.ObjectivesWe aimed to determine the predictors for low FFR at LCx and possible treatment strategies for compromised LCx, together with their long‐term outcomes.MethodsAltogether, 563 patients who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to November 2020 with significant distal LM bifurcation lesions. They underwent single‐stent crossover percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance with further LCx intervention based on the measured FFR.ResultsThe patients showed significant angiographic LCx ostial affection post‐LM stenting, but only 116 (20.6%) patients had FFR < 0.8. The three‐year composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were comparable between the high and low FFR groups (16.8% vs. 15.5; p = 0.744). In a multivariate analysis, low FFR at the LCx was associated with post‐stenting minimal luminal area (MLA) of LCx (odds ratio [OR]: 0.032, p < .001), post‐stenting LCx plaque burden (OR: 1.166, p < .001), poststenting LM MLA (OR: 0.821, p = .038), and prestenting LCx MLA (OR: 0.371, p = .044). In the low FFR group, those with compromised LCx managed with drug‐eluting balloon had the lowest three‐year MACE rate (8.1%), as compared to either those undergoing kissing balloon inflation (KBI) (17.5%) or stenting (20.5%) (p = 0.299).ConclusionUnnecessary LCx interventions can be avoided with FFR‐guided LCx intervention. Poststenting MLA and plaque burden of the LCx, and main vessel stent length are poststenting predictors of low FFR.     

2型糖尿病对冠状动脉左主干病变介入治疗预后的影响

目的:探讨合并2型糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的冠状动脉左主干病变患者预后的影响.方法:回顾性分析中国医学科学院阜外医院2004年1月至2015年12月接受PCI的冠状动脉左主干病变的患者3960例.根据患者是否合并2型糖尿病分为糖尿病组(1084例)和非糖尿病组(2876)例.收集纳入患者的临床资料、实...     

Left main intervention in myocardial infarction

We report an 84‐year‐old patient who suddenly developed nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and needed intubation, assisted ventilation and pharmacological vasopressor support. Admission EKG showed anterior and lateral leads ST segment depression and 2 mm ST segment elevation in avR lead. Angiogram showed unprotected left‐main coronary‐artery (LM) sub‐occlusive disease and totally occluded ostial right‐coronary‐artery (RCA), distally filled through the left‐coronary system. Unprotected LM disease was immediately treated with bare metal stent. The stent jailed the left‐circunflex coronary‐artery (LCx) ostium but did not compromise the arterial flow. Lately, the patient was discharged in a very good health condition. Ten months angiographic follow‐up showed an extremely compromised LCx ostium treated successfully with drug eluted stent (DES) and mid left anterior descendent (LAD) severe lesion, treated with DES. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Virtual Coronary Intervention: A Treatment Planning Tool Based Upon the Angiogram

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the ability of a novel virtual coronary intervention (VCI) tool based on invasive angiography to predict the patient’s physiological response to stenting.BackgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical and economic outcomes compared with angiographic guidance alone. Virtual (v)FFR can be calculated based upon a 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the coronary anatomy from the angiogram, using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. This technology can be used to perform virtual stenting, with a predicted post-PCI FFR, and the prospect of optimized treatment planning.MethodsPatients undergoing elective PCI had pressure-wire–based FFR measurements pre- and post-PCI. A 3D reconstruction of the diseased artery was generated from the angiogram and imported into the VIRTUheart workflow, without the need for any invasive physiological measurements. VCI was performed using a radius correction tool replicating the dimensions of the stent deployed during PCI. Virtual FFR (vFFR) was calculated pre- and post-VCI, using CFD analysis. vFFR pre- and post-VCI were compared with measured (m)FFR pre- and post-PCI, respectively.ResultsFifty-four patients and 59 vessels underwent PCI. The mFFR and vFFR pre-PCI were 0.66 ± 0.14 and 0.68 ± 0.13, respectively. Pre-PCI vFFR deviated from mFFR by ±0.05 (mean Δ = ?0.02; SD = 0.07). The mean mFFR and vFFR post-PCI/VCI were 0.90 ± 0.05 and 0.92 ± 0.05, respectively. Post-VCI vFFR deviated from post-PCI mFFR by ±0.02 (mean Δ = ?0.01; SD = 0.03). Mean CFD processing time was 95 s per case.ConclusionsThe authors have developed a novel VCI tool, based upon the angiogram, that predicts the physiological response to stenting with a high degree of accuracy.     

The Impact of Downstream Coronary Stenosis on Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Human Validation

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the impact of downstream coronary stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) or left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) on the assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) across an intermediate left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis in humans with the pressure wire positioned in the nondiseased downstream vessel.BackgroundAccurate assessment of intermediate LMCA disease is critical for guiding decisions regarding revascularization. In theory, FFR across an intermediate LMCA stenosis will be affected by downstream disease, even if the pressure wire is positioned in the nondiseased downstream vessel.MethodsAfter percutaneous coronary intervention of the LAD, LCx, or both, an intermediate LMCA stenosis was created with a deflated balloon catheter. FFR was measured in the LAD and LCx coronary arteries before and after creation of downstream stenosis by inflating an angioplasty balloon within the newly placed stent. The true FFR (FFR_true) of the LMCA, measured in the nondiseased downstream vessel in the absence of stenosis in the other vessel, was compared with the apparent FFR (FFR_app) measured in the presence of stenosis.ResultsIn 25 patients, 91 pairs of measurements were made, 71 with LAD stenosis and 20 with LCx stenosis. FFR_true of the LMCA was significantly lower than FFR_app (0.81 ± 0.08 vs. 0.83 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), although the numerical difference was small. This difference correlated with the severity of the downstream disease (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). In all cases in which FFR_app was >0.85, FFR_true was >0.80.ConclusionsIn most cases, downstream disease does not have a clinically significant impact on the assessment of FFR across an intermediate LMCA stenosis with the pressure wire positioned in the nondiseased vessel.     

Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE—To investigate the value of coronary pressure derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in supporting decisions about medical or surgical treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.
DESIGN—A two centre prospective single cohort follow up study.
INTERVENTIONS—FFR of the left main coronary artery was determined in 54 consecutive patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery disease. If FFR was 0.75, medical treatment was chosen; if FFR was < 0.75, surgical treatment was chosen.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or any coronary revascularisation procedure.
RESULTS—In 24 patients (44%), FFR was 0.75 and medical treatment was chosen (medical group). In the remaining 30 patients (56%), FFR was < 0.75 and bypass surgery was performed (surgical group). Mean (SD) follow up was 29 (15) months (range 12-65 months). Survival among patients at three years of follow up was 100% in the medical group and 97% in the surgical group. Event-free survival was 76% in the medical group and 83% in the surgical group.
CONCLUSIONS—FFR supports decision making in equivocal left main coronary artery disease. If FFR is below 0.75, the decision for bypass surgery is supported. If FFR is above 0.75, a conservative approach is justified.


Keywords: coronary artery disease; left main coronary artery; fractional flow reserve; coronary artery bypass     

The effect of CTO recanalization on FFR of the donor artery

This case illustrates that fractional flow reserve (FFR) in addition to the severity and length of the coronary stenosis is critically dependent on the extent of viable myocardium perfused. In the presented case, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) that had modest angiographic stenosis supplied collaterals to the entire left ventricle. After recanalization of chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the right and circumflex arteries, FFR in the LAD had normalized. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement

The optimal revascularization strategy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes after selective PCI of only hemodynamically significant lesions (fractional flow reserve, or FFR < 0.75) to CABG of all stenoses in patients with MVD. In 150 patients with MVD referred for CABG, FFR was determined in 381 coronary arteries considered for bypass grafting. If the FFR was less than 0.75 in three vessels or in two vessels including the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery, CABG was performed (CABG group). If only one or two vessels were physiologically significant (not including the proximal LAD), PCI of those lesions was performed (PCI group). Of the 150 patients, 87 fulfilled the criteria for CABG and 63 for PCI. There were no significant differences in the angiographic or other baseline characteristics between the two groups. At 2-year follow-up, no differences were seen in adverse events, including repeat revascularization (event-free survival 74% in the CABG group and 72% in the PCI group). A similar number of patients were free from angina (84% in the CABG group and 82% in the PCI group). Importantly, the results in both groups were as good as the surgical groups in previous studies comparing PCI and CABG in MVD. In patients with multivessel disease, PCI in those with one or two hemodynamically significant lesions as identified by an FFR < 0.75 yields a similar favorable outcome as CABG in those with three or more culprit lesions despite a similar angiographic extent of disease.     

Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a simple, reliable, and reproducible physiologic index of lesion severity. In patients with intermediate stenosis, FFR≥0.75 can be used to safely defer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and patients with FFR≥0.75 have a very low cardiac event rate. Coronary pressure measurement can determine which lesion should be treated with PCI in patients with tandem lesions, and PCI on the basis of FFR has been demonstrated to result in an acceptably low repeat PCI rate. FFR can identify patients with equivocal left main coronary artery disease who benefit from coronary bypass surgery. Coronary pressure measurement distinguishes patients with an abrupt pressure drop pattern from those with a gradual pressure drop pattern, and the former group of patients benefit from PCI. Coronary pressure measurement is clinically useful in evaluating sufficient recruitable coronary collateral blood flow for prevention of ischemia, which affects future cardiac events. FFR is useful for the prediction of restenosis after PCI. As an end-point of PCI, FFR ≥0.95 and ≥0.90 would be appropriate for coronary stenting and coronary angioplasty, respectively. In summary, if you encounter a coronary stenosis in doubt you should measure pressure rather than dilate it.     

Physiological and intravascular ultrasound assessment of an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

The angiographic assessment of an ambiguous left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and not reliable. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) have improved the diagnostic utility of an ambiguous LMCA stenosis. The combined role of FFR and IVUS in patients with an ambiguous LMCA stenosis is discussed.     

Role of Coronary Calcium Scoring in the Assessment of Physiological Ischemia in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis

Although coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an established marker of coronary atherosclerosis, whether it also reflects the physiological significance is unknown. This study aims to evaluate if CAC could indicate physiological ischemia in intermediate stenosis defined by an invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). CAC score (CACS) derived from either whole coronary arteries or individual arteries was measured by computed tomography among patients with intermediate de novo lesions (percent diameter stenosis from 30% to less than 70%). All stenoses were evaluated by invasive FFR; lesions with an FFR ≤ 0.80 were considered significant. We enrolled 119 patients with 143 lesions. Of these, 42 lesions (29.4%) demonstrated significant ischemia by FFR measurement. FFR values had modest but significant correlations with CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis (r = − 0.290; p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CACS of individual arteries with intermediate stenosis had 71.4% sensitivity and 67.3% specificity as a predictor of significant ischemia at a cut off value of 145.9. Multivariable analysis showed that percent diameter stenosis and CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis were independent predictors for significant ischemia. By net reclassification improvement analysis, CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis provided incremental prediction for significant ischemia over minimum lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis, and lesion length. CACS measured in each artery, but not the total CACS, provides additional information as to whether an angiographically intermediate stenosis within the artery is significant enough to cause myocardial ischemia.     

血流储备分数指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术中非罪犯中度狭窄血管治疗策略的研究

目的：通过测量血流储备分数（FFR）,决定是否对不稳定型心绞痛多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）术中非罪犯中度狭窄血管行介入治疗,并观察临床转归。方法本研究入选不稳定型心绞痛多支血管病变患者,首先对已明确的罪犯血管行PCI治疗后,针对非罪犯中度狭窄血管按照单双号分为对照组（非支架组）和观察组（FFR指导下行PCI组）。其中,观察组FFR＜0.8的患者对中度狭窄血管行PCI治疗,术后再次行FFR检测,确保FFR≥0.95。观察终点事件为全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、再次血运重建发生率以及心绞痛临床表现。结果共纳入71例患者,对照组35例;观察组36例,其中FFR≥0.8的患者23例,FFR＜0.8的患者13例。两组患者无主要终点事件和再次血运重建生存率分别比较,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;无全因死亡与非致死性心肌梗死生存率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义。针对靶血管不良事件的统计学分析显示,两组再次血运重建（观察组5.6%,对照组31.4%）及非致死性心肌梗死（观察组5.6%,对照组28.6%）发生率分别比较,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论不稳定型心绞痛患者中,使用压力导丝测出的FFR值来决定是否对非罪犯中度病变进行血运重建是安全的。FFR结合冠状动脉造影指导PCI治疗较单纯冠状动脉造影指导PCI的不良事件发生率显著减少,尤其在再次血运重建方面,并且心绞痛临床表现显著缓解。     

Factors influencing the functional significance in intermediate coronary stenosis

Objective To analyze the influencing factors of the functional significance determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in interme-diate coronary artery stenosis. Methods The study enrolled 143 patients with 203 intermediate coronary lesions. Pressure-derived FFR of these lesions was gained at maximal hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine infusion. An FFR < 0.80 was considered as abnormal functional significance. Anatomic parameters at the lesion sites were obtained by off-line quantitative coronary angiography analysis (QCA). The predictive value of the demographic characteristics and anatomic parameters for FFR in these intermediate lesions was assessed using multiple linear and binary logistic regression analysis. Results Overall, FFR < 0.8 was found in 70 (34%) of the total 203 intermediate coronary lesions. FFR values were positively correlated with QCA-measured minimum lumen diameters (MLD, r = 0.372, P = 0.000) and the reference vessel diameters (RVD, r = 0.217, P = 0.002) were negatively correlated with percent area stenosis (AS, r = -0.251, P = 0.000) and percent diameter stenosis (DS, r = -0.210, P = 0.000). Age, MLD and the lesion location in different coronary arteries were the independent determinants of FFR < 0.8. Conclusions MLD can predict the functional significance of intermediate coro-nary stenosis, while age and the lesion location in different coronary arteries should be taken into account as important influencing factors of FFR values.     

Relationship between Whole Blood Viscosity and Lesion Severity in Coronary Artery Disease

Objective  This article investigates the relationship of fractional flow reserve (FFR) with whole blood viscosity (WBV) in patients who were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome and significant stenosis in the major coronary arteries and underwent the measurement of FFR. Material and Method  In the FFR measurements performed to evaluate the severity of coronary artery stenosis, 160 patients were included in the study and divided into two groups as follows: 80 with significant stenosis and 80 with nonsignificant stenosis. WBVs at low shear rate (LSR) and high shear rate (HSR) were compared between the patients in the significant and nonsignificant coronary artery stenosis groups. Results  In the group with FFR < 0.80 and significant coronary artery stenosis, WBV was significantly higher compared with the group with nonsignificant coronary artery stenosis in terms of both HSR (19.33 ± 0.84) and LSR (81.19 ± 14.20) ( p  < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, HSR and LSR were independent predictors of significant coronary artery stenosis (HSR: odds ratio: 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.17–2.64; LSR: odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval: 2.19–2.78). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, when the cutoff value of WBV at LSR was taken as 79.23, it had 58.42% sensitivity and 62.13% specificity for the prediction of significant coronary artery stenosis (area under the ROC curve: 0.628, p  < 0.001). Conclusion  WBV, an inexpensive biomarker that can be easily calculated prior to coronary angiography, was higher in patients with functionally severe coronary artery stenosis, and thus could be a useful marker in predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.     

3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

ObjectivesThe present study aimed to investigate the difference in target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years after double kissing (DK) crush stenting versus provisional stenting (PS) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation (UPLMb) lesions.BackgroundThe multicenter and randomized DKCRUSH-V (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial) study showed fewer 1-year TLF after DK crush for UPLMb lesions compared with PS. The study reports the 3-year clinical outcome of the DKCRUSH-V study.MethodsA total of 482 patients with UPLMb lesions who were randomly assigned to either the DK crush group (DK group) or PS group in the DKCRUSH-V study were followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a TLF at 3 years. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the safety endpoint. Patients were classified by lesion’s complexity and NERS (New Risk Stratification) II or SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score.ResultsAt 3 years, TLF occurred in 41 (16.9%) patients in the PS group and in 20 (8.3%) patients in the DK group (p = 0.005), mainly driven by increased target vessel myocardial infarction (5.8% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.017) and target lesion revascularization (10.3% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.029). Definite or probable ST rate at 3 years was 4.1% in the PS group and 0.4% in the DK group (p = 0.006). Notably, DK crush was associated with a significant reduction in both primary and secondary endpoints for patients with complex lesions or at high risk.ConclusionsProvisional stenting for UPLMb lesions was associated with significantly increased rates of TLF and ST over 3 years of follow-up. Further randomized study is warranted to confirm the benefits of DK crush stenting for complex UPLMb lesions. (Double Kissing and Double Crush versus Provisional T Stenting Technique for the Treatment of Unprotected Distal Left Main True Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized, International, Multi-center Clinical Trial; ChiCTR-TRC-11001213).     

Unprotected left main stenting,short- and long-term outcomes

Abstract

Background: Coronary bypass surgery is recommended for the treatment of left main coronary stenosis. Recently a percutaneous approach has been described as a feasible option. Objectives: To present the in-hospital and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of a consecutive group of patients undergoing stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, and to compare the clinical and angiographic outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) versus metal stent (BMS). Methods: 238 consecutive patients underwent unprotected LMCA stenting. 165 received BMS and 73 received DES. Most patients (88.7%) presented with acute coronary syndrome. Clinical (100%) and angiographic (84%) follow-up was obtained. Results: Patients’ presentation: STEMI (7.2%), non-STEMI (13.5%), unstable angina (67.6%), stable angina (11.7%). Procedural success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 2.1%, all in patients presented with unstable hemodynamic conditions. None of the patients needed emergent CABG. In the long-term follow-up (average three years) there were 12 deaths (5%), 3 patients required CABG and 25 patients required TVR. The overall angiographic LM restenosis rate show a trend toward lower rate in the DES group than the BMS group (9.6% versus 13.8%, P = 0.08). There was no difference in one year mortality (4.1% versus 4.2%) and AMI (2.7% versus 2.8%) between DES and BMS. Conclusions: Stenting for LM stenosis can be performed safely with acceptable in hospital and long-term outcome. Reconsideration of current guidelines should be considered. Drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected LMCA stenosis appears safe with regard to acute and long-term complications and is more effective in preventing restenosis compared to BMS implantation.     

Pulse transmission coefficient: a nonhyperemic index for physiologic assessment of procedural success following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Intracoronary pressure measurements and the determination of fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) predict adverse events. Coronary lesions may impair the transmission of pressure waves across a stenosis, potentially acting as a high-frequency filter. The pulse transmission coefficient (PTC) is a nonhyperemic parameter that calculates the transmission of high-frequency components of the pressure signal through a stenosis. It was shown recently that PTC is highly correlated with FFR. This study was designed to examine the change of PTC as compared to FFR following PCI. Pressure signals were obtained by pressure guidewire in 27 lesions pre- and post-PCI and were analyzed with an algorithm that identifies the high-frequency component in the pressure signal. The PTC was calculated at baseline as the ratio between distal and proximal high-frequency components of the pressure waveform across the lesion. FFR measurements were assessed with intracoronary adenosine. There was a significant increase in PTC following PCI (0.15 +/- 0.17 at baseline vs. 0.84 +/- 0.11 post-PCI; P < 0.001). Comparable changes were observed for FFR (0.58 +/- 0.12 at baseline vs. 0.91 +/- 0.05 post-PCI; P < 0.001). PTC is a nonhyperemic parameter for physiologic assessment of coronary artery stenoses. Similar to FFR, PTC is significantly increased following PCI. Thus, it may serve as an adjunct index for the functional assessment of procedural success following PCI.     

血管内超声显像指标对冠状动脉中度狭窄病变功能意义的判断价值

目的:评估血管内超声显像(intravascularultrasound,IVUS)测定的指标对冠状动脉中度狭窄病变功能意义的判断价值。方法:46支冠状动脉造影(coronaryarteryangiography,CAG)显示中度狭窄(直径狭窄率40%～60%)的冠状动脉,压力导丝测定心肌血流储备分数(myocardialfractionalflowreserve,FFRmyo),IVUS测定面积狭窄率及最小管腔面积。以FFRmyo<0.75为界限值,采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiveroperatingcharacteristic,ROC)选择IVUS测量的每个指标的截断点。结果:46支血管病变的直径狭窄率(49±11)%,FFRmyo为(0.83±0.15),显著低于正常组(FFRmyo为0.97±0.02)。14处(30%)病变低于界限值(FFRmyo<0.75)。IVUS面积狭窄率与FFRmyo呈负相关(r=-0.68,P<0.001)。以FFRmyo<0.75为界限值,根据ROC分析,面积狭窄率≥65%为截断点,灵敏度=100%,特异性=72%。最小管腔面积与FFRmyo呈正相关(r=0.63,P<0.001),以最小管腔面积≤4mm2为截断点,灵敏度=93%,特异性=77%。结论:IVUS测定的面积狭窄率≥65%、最小管腔面积≤4mm2,能较准确地判断中度狭窄病变的功能意义。     

Directional atherectomy of left main stenoses

Balloon angioplasty (PTCA) of left main (LM) stenoses is limited by frequent clinical restenosis. Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) may be an effective alternative to PTCA due to its ability to achieve a greater postprocedural luminal diameter when treating bulky, eccentric plaques and aorto-ostial lesions. We analyzed the acute and long-term results following 24 DCA procedures in 22 patients with “protected” LM lesions. Acute success (residual stenosis ≤ 40%, no major ischemic complications) was 88% overall, 100% in 13 planned procedures, and 73% in 11 adjunctive DCA procedures that followed suboptimal PTCA. Mean LM stenosis was reduced from 86% to 13% (P < 0.01). There were no procedural complications directly attributed to DCA. At a mean of 24 ± 3 months, the clinical restenosis rate was 16%, survival was 100%, and event-free survival (freedom from death, MI, or repeat lesion-related interventions) was 89%. We conclude that DCA in protected LM lesions (1) can achieved excellent angiographic results with low procedural complication rates, (2) may succeed where PTCA yields subopitimal results, and (3) may provide late clinical outcomes superior to those of balloon angioplasty. © Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Impact of fractional flow reserve on decision-making in daily clinical practice: A single center experience in Egypt

Background

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the reference standard for the assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses, but remains underutilized. Our aims were to study whether FFR changed the decision for treatment of intermediate coronary lesions and to assess the clinical outcome in the deferred and intervention groups.