Impact of genetic subtypes of Prader–Willi syndrome with growth hormone therapy on intelligence and body mass index

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a genomic imprinting disorder characterized by infantile hypotonia with a poor suck and failure to thrive, hypogenitalism/hypogonadism, behavior and cognitive problems, hormone deficiencies, hyperphagia, and obesity. The Stanford Binet and Wechsler (WAIS‐R; WISC‐III) intelligence (IQ) tests were administered on 103 individuals with PWS from two separate cohorts [University of California, Irvine (UCI) (N = 56) and Vanderbilt University (N = 47)] and clinical information obtained including growth hormone (GH) treatment, PWS molecular classes, weight and height. Significantly higher IQ scores (p < .02) were found representing the vocabulary section of the Stanford Binet test in the growth hormone (GH) treated group when compared with non‐GH treatment in the pediatric‐based UCI PWS cohort with a trend for stabilization of vocabulary IQ scores with age in the GH treated maternal disomy (UPD) 15 subject group. Significant differences (p = .05) were also found in the adult‐based Vanderbilt PWS cohort with 15q11‐q13 deletion subjects having lower Verbal IQ scores compared with UPD 15. No difference in body mass index was identified based on the PWS molecular class or genetic subtype. Medical care and response to treatment with growth hormone may influence intelligence impacted by PWS genetic subtypes and possibly age, but more studies are needed.     

Three siblings with Prader–Willi syndrome caused by imprinting center microdeletions and review

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex genetic imprinting disorder characterized by childhood obesity, short stature, hypogonadism/hypogenitalism, hypotonia, cognitive impairment, and behavioral problems. Usually PWS occurs sporadically due to the loss of paternally expressed genes on chromosome 15 with the majority of individuals having the 15q11‐q13 region deleted. Examples of familial PWS have been reported but rarely. To date 13 families have been reported with more than one child with PWS and without a 15q11‐q13 deletion secondary to a chromosome 15 translocation, inversion, or uniparental maternal disomy 15. Ten of those 13 families were shown to carry microdeletions in the PWS imprinting center. The microdeletions were found to be of paternal origin in nine of the ten cases in which family studies were carried out. Using a variety of techniques, the microdeletions were identified in regions within the complex SNRPN gene locus encompassing the PWS imprinting center. Here, we report the clinical and genetic findings in three adult siblings with PWS caused by a microdeletion in the chromosome 15 imprinting center inherited from an unaffected father that controls the activity of genes in the 15q11‐q13 region and summarize the 13 reported cases in the literature.

     

Third Prader‐Willi syndrome phenotype due to maternal uniparental disomy 15 with mosaic trisomy 15

We report on a boy with mosaicism for trisomy 15 and Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS) due to maternal isodisomy for chromosome 15. His phenotype is consistent with PWS and trisomy 15 mosaicism. Although our patient is unusual in having maternal isodisomy rather than the more common maternal heterodisomy, we think that his more severe PWS phenotype is due to his trisomy 15 mosaicism rather than to homozygosity for deleterious chromosome 15 genes. We propose that individuals with PWS have one of three similar but distinctive phenotypes depending on the cause of their condition. Patients with paternal deletions have the typical PWS phenotype, patients with maternal UPD have a slightly milder phenotype with better cognitive function, and those with maternal UPD and mosaic trisomy 15 have the most severe phenotype with a high incidence of congenital heart disease. These phenotype–genotype differences are useful to guide the work‐up of patients with suspected PWS and to provide prognostic counseling for families. Am. J. Med. Genet. 93:215–218, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of perinatal factors in deletion versus uniparental disomy in Prader–Willi syndrome

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by a deficiency of imprinted genes in the 15q11‐q13 region and is characterized by prenatal onset of hypotonia, poor feeding, childhood‐onset obesity, hyperphagia, short stature, facial dysmorphism, intellectual disability, and behavioral problems. We studied perinatal factors in a cohort of 64 people with PWS resulting from paternal deletion of 15q11‐q13 and maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 15. We recruited 34 individuals with deletion and 30 with UPD. We compared the frequency of multiple prenatal and neonatal factors with the general population as well as between the two genetic subtypes. Of the 64 individuals with PWS, fetal movements were decreased in 82.8%, 31.7% were born prematurely, 42.1% by Cesarean section, and 35.9% required oxytocin induction. Apgar scores were low in 34.6%, 96.8% had feeding difficulty, 50% needed tube feeding, and 6.2% subsequently had gastrostomy tube placement. On comparing findings in the deletion versus the UPD groups, we did not find many significant differences. We, however, found a higher maternal age, and also later age at diagnosis in the UPD versus the deletion group. PWS subjects have higher rates of perinatal complications, especially Cesarean section rate, hypotonia, and low Apgar scores compared to the general population. We did not find many differences between the genetic subtypes, except for later age of diagnosis of the UPD 15 group suggesting a milder phenotype. We also found that the mothers in the UPD were older, supporting the hypothesis that UPD results from nondisjunction associated trisomy rescue.     

Contributing factors of mortality in Prader–Willi syndrome

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a multi‐system disorder resulting from a lack of paternal gene expression in the 15q11.2‐q13 region. Using databases compiled through response questionnaires completed by families known to the Prader‐Willi Syndrome Association (USA), this study tested the hypothesis that PWS genetic subtype, BMI, age of diagnosis, clinical symptoms, and growth hormone treatment differ among deceased and living individuals with PWS. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using chi‐square and two‐group t tests, respectively. Deceased individuals had higher rates of clinical features, including increased weight concerns, heart problems, sleep apnea, other respiratory complications, diabetes, osteoporosis, high pain tolerance, and severe skin picking, when compared to living individuals. Meanwhile, living individuals had higher rates of growth hormone use and early puberty. Obesity and subsequent consequences are the primary contributors to increased mortality in PWS. Additional emphasis on areas to decrease mortality is needed.     

Risk assessment of medically assisted reproduction and advanced maternal ages in the development of Prader–Willi syndrome due to UPD(15)mat

Recent studies have suggested that disomic oocyte‐mediated uniparental disomy 15 (UPD(15)mat) is increased in patients with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) born after medically assisted reproduction (MAR). However, it remains unknown whether the increase is primarily due to MAR procedure itself or advanced maternal childbearing ages as a predisposing factor for the disomic oocyte production. To examine this matter, we studied 122 naturally conceived PWS patients (PWS‐NC group) and 13 MAR‐conceived patients (PWS‐MAR group). The relative frequency of disomic oocyte‐mediated UPD(15)mat was significantly higher in PWS‐MAR group than in PWS‐NC group (7/13 vs 20/122, p = 0.0045), and the maternal childbearing ages were significantly higher in PWS‐MAR group than in PWS‐NC group [median (range), 38 (26–45) vs 30 (19–42), p = 0.0015]. However, the logistic regression analysis revealed no significant association between the occurrence of disomic oocyte‐mediated UPD(15)mat and MAR, after adjusting for childbearing age (p = 0.25). Consistent with this, while the frequency of assisted reproductive technology (ART)‐conceived livebirths was higher in the PWS patients than in the Japanese general population (6.4% vs 1.1%, p = 0.00018), the distribution of childbearing ages was significantly skewed to the increased ages in the PWS patients (p < 2.2 × 10^?16). These results argue against a positive association of MAR procedure itself with the development of UPD(15)mat.     

Origin of uniparental disomy 15 in patients with Prader‐Willi or Angelman syndrome

Maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) accounts for ∼25% of Prader‐Willi patients (PWS) and paternal UPD for about 2–5% of Angelman syndrome (AS) patients. These findings and the parental origin of deletions are evidence of genomic imprinting in the cause of PWS and AS. The natural occurrence of UPD individuals allows the study of meiotic mechanisms resulting in chromosomal nondisjunction (ND). We selected patients with UPD15 from our sample of 30 PWS and 40 AS patients to study the origin of ND and the recombination along chromosome 15. These patients were analyzed with 10 microsatellites throughout the entire chromosome 15 (D15S541, D15S542, D15S11, D15S113, GABRB3, CYP19, D15S117, D15S131, D15S984, D15S115). The analysis disclosed seven heterodisomic PWS cases originating by meiosis I (MI) ND (four showed recombination and three no recombination), and one isodisomic PWS UPD15 originating by postzygotic duplication. Among the five paternal UPD15, we detected four isodisomies, three of which showed homozigosity for all markers, corresponding to a mitotic error, and one case originating from a paternal MII ND. Our results indicate that besides maternal MI and MII ND, paternal ND occurs when a PWS UPD15 patient originates from mitotic duplication of the maternal chromosome 15. ND events in AS are mainly due to mitotic errors, but paternal MII ND can occur and give origin to an AS UPD15 individual by two different mechanisms: rescue of a trisomic fetus or fertilization of a nullisomic egg with the disomic sperm, and in this case paternal and maternal ND are necessary. Am. J. Med. Genet. 94:249–253, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Prader‐Willi syndrome genetic subtypes and clinical neuropsychiatric diagnoses in residential care adults

The historical diagnosis of Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS), a complex genetic disorder, in adults is often achieved by clinical presentation rather than by genetic testing and thus limited genetic subtype‐specific psychometric investigations and treatment options. Genetic testing and clinical psychiatric evaluation using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)‐IV‐TR criteria were undertaken on 72 adult residents (34 M; 38 F) from the Prader‐Willi Homes of Oconomowoc (PWHO), a specialty PWS group home system. Methylation specific‐multiplex ligation probe amplification and high‐resolution microarrays were analyzed for methylation status, 15q11‐q13 deletions and maternal uniparental disomy 15 (mUPD15). Seventy (33M; 37F) of 72 residents were genetically confirmed and 36 (51%) had Type I or Type II deletions; 29 (42%) with mUPD15 and 5 (7%) with imprinting defects from three separate families. Psychiatric comorbidities were classified as anxiety disorder (38%), excoriation (skin picking) (33%), intermittent explosive disorder ([30%‐predominantly among males at 45% compared with females at 16% [OR = 4.3, 95%CI 1.4‐13.1, P < 0.008]) and psychotic features (23%). Psychiatric diagnoses did not differ between mUPD15 vs deletion, but a greater number of psychiatric diagnoses were observed for the larger Type I (4.3) vs smaller Type II (3.6) deletions when age was controlled (F = 5.0, P < 0.04). Adults with PWS presented with uniformly higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities which differed by genetic subtype with gender‐specific trends.     

Mosaicism for maternal uniparental disomy 15 in a boy with some clinical features of Prader–Willi syndrome

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by the lack of paternal expression of imprinted genes in the human chromosomal region 15q11.2–q13.2, which can be due to an interstitial deletion at 15q11.2–q13 of paternal origin (65–75%), maternal uniparental disomy (matUPD) of chromosome 15 (20–30%), or an imprinting defect (1–3%). The majority of PWS-associated matUPD15 cases represent a complete heterodisomy of chromosome 15 or a mixture of hetero- and isodisomic regions across the chromosome 15. Pure maternal isodisomy is observed in only a few matUPD15 patients. Here we report a case of an 18-year-old boy with some clinical features of Prader–Willi syndrome, such as overweight, muscular hypotonia, facial dysmorphism and psychiatric problems, but there was no reason to suspect PWS in the patient based solely on the phenotype estimation. However, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) revealed mosaic loss of heterozygosity of the entire chromosome 15. Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependant probe amplification (MS-MLPA) analysis showed hypermethylation of the SNRPN and NDN genes in the PWS/AS critical region of chromosome 15 in this patient. Taking into consideration the MS-MLPA results and the presence of PWS features in the patient, we concluded that it was matUPD15, although the patient's parents were not enrolled in the study. According to CMA and karyotyping, no trisomic or monosomic cells were present. To the best of our knowledge, only two PWS cases with mosaic maternal isodisomy 15 and without trisomic/monosomic cell lines have been reported so far.     

Frequency of Prader–Willi syndrome in births conceived via assisted reproductive technology

PurposePrader–Willi syndrome is an imprinting disorder characterized by typical facial, physical, and cognitive/behavioral features, resulting from lack of paternally expressed genes on chromosome 15q11.2–q13. Studies have suggested an increased risk of other imprinting disorders in children conceived by assisted reproductive techniques. This study was designed to determine the association between assisted reproductive technology and Prader–Willi syndrome.MethodsData on individuals with Prader–Willi syndrome were collected from three distinct sources and the proportion of assisted reproductive technology births analyzed.ResultsThe proportions of assisted reproductive technology births in the Prader-Willi Syndrome Association (USA), Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network, and University of California, Irvine Medical Center populations were 1.0% (18/1,736), 1.0% (1/98), and 2.0% (1/50), respectively (overall 1.1%; population frequency for the United States was 1.0%). Of note, 2.4% (45/1,898) of participants were co-twins (11 born after assisted reproductive technology procedures); US twin frequency is 1.6% (P = 0.007). The proportion of individuals with maternal disomy 15/imprinting defects born after assisted reproductive technology was higher than that in the total sample, 55.6% (10/18) and 34.5% (431/1,250), respectively.ConclusionThis study found no association between assisted reproductive technology and Prader–Willi syndrome. There was an increased frequency of twinning. The number of individuals with maternal disomy 15/imprinting defect was nearly double in the assisted reproductive technology group as compared with the total Prader–Willi syndrome participants.Genet Med16 2, 164–169.     

Submicroscopic deletion in cousins with Prader‐Willi syndrome causes a grandmatrilineal inheritance pattern: Effects of imprinting

The Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS) critical region on 15q11–q13 is subject to imprinting. PWS becomes apparent when genes on the paternally inherited chromosome are not expressed. Familial PWS is rare. We report on a family in which a male and a female paternal first cousin both have PWS with cytogenetically normal karyotypes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis shows a submicroscopic deletion of SNRPN, but not the closely associated loci D15S10, D15S11, D15S63, and GABRB3. The cousins' fathers and two paternal aunts have the same deletion and are clinically normal. The grandmother of the cousins is deceased and not available for study, and their grandfather is not deleted for SNRPN. DNA methylation analysis of D15S63 is consistent with an abnormality of the imprinting center associated with PWS. “Grandmatrilineal” inheritance occurs when a woman with deletion of an imprinted, paternally expressed gene is at risk of having affected grandchildren through her sons. In this case, PWS does not become evident as long as the deletion is passed through the matrilineal line. This represents a unique inheritance pattern due to imprinting. Am. J. Med. Genet. 92:19–24, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Birth seasonality studies in a large Prader–Willi syndrome cohort

Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS) is generally due to sporadic paternal deletions of the chromosome 15q11‐q13 region followed by maternal disomy 15. Advanced maternal age is more commonly seen in those with maternal disomy 15. Environmental factors (e.g., drug use, occupational chemical exposure, infectious agents, and irradiation) could account for chromosome changes. Previous evidence of differences in male and female gametogenesis could suggest an environmental role in the causation of the paternal 15q11‐q13 deletion seen in PWS. Certain occupations such as hydrocarbon‐exposing occupations (e.g., landscaping, farming, and painting) and viral exposure (e.g., human coronavirus 229E causing upper respiratory infections in adults with an incorporation site in the human genome at chromosome 15q11) can be seasonal in nature and contribute to chromosome damage. To assess, we reviewed birth seasonality data in a large cohort of individuals with PWS recruited nationally (N = 355) but no significant differences were seen by month between those with the 15q11‐q13 deletion compared with maternal disomy 15 when analyzing quarterly seasonal patterns. Although early evidence supported birth seasonality differences in PWS, a larger number of individuals in our recent study using advanced genetic testing methods did not find this observation.     

Molecular subtype and growth hormone effects on dysmorphology in Prader–Willi syndrome

Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) affects 1/15,000–1/30,000 live births and is characterized by lack of expression of paternally inherited genes on 15q11.2‐15q13 caused by paternal deletions, maternal uniparental disomy (UPD), or imprinting defects. Affected individuals have distinct physical features, and growth hormone (GH) deficiency occurs in some individuals with PWS. The aim of this study is to test the hypotheses that (a) individuals with deletions and UPD have different physical and dysmorphic features, (b) individuals treated with GH have different physical and dysmorphic features than those not treated, and (c) GH treatment effects are different for individuals with UPD in comparison to those with deletions. Study participants included 30 individuals with deletions or UPD, who did or did not have GH treatment. Participants’ molecular abnormalities were determined by molecular and cytogenetic analysis. Clinical data were obtained by a single dysmorphologist. Individuals with deletions were found to be heavier (p = .001), taller (p = .031), with smaller head circumferences (p = .042) and were more likely to have fair skin and hair than their family members (p = .031, .049, respectively) compared to UPD patients. Females with deletions more commonly had hypoplastic labia minora (p = .009) and clitoris (.030) in comparison to those with UPD. Individuals who received GH in both deletion and UPD groups were taller (p = .004), had larger hands (p = .011) and feet (p = .006) and a trend for a larger head circumference (p = .103). Interestingly, the GH‐treated group also had a lower rate of strabismus (esotropia [p = .017] and exotropia [p = .039]). This study showed statistically significant correlations between phenotype and molecular subtypes and also between phenotype and GH treatment.     

A variety of genetic mechanisms are associated with the Prader–Willi syndrome

An extensive set of chromosome 15 DNA polymorphisms and densitometric analysis with four markers mapping to the Prader–Willi chromosome region (PWCR) of chromosome 15 have been used to characterize a cohort of 30 subjects with classical Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS). Molecular analysis enabled the classification of the PWS subjects into four groups: (A) 18 subjects (60%) had deletions of paternal 15q11–13 involving a common set of DNA markers. Two subjects had differently sized deletions, one larger and one smaller than the other cases. (B) Eight (27%) had maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15. (C) One (3%) had a marker chromosome carrying an extra copy of the PWCR. The marker chromosome was demonstrated to be of paternal origin and the two intact chromosomes were maternally derived. This case represents an apparent exception to the generally held view that PWS is associated with an absence of paternally inherited gene(s) located in the PWCR. (D) The remaining three cases (10%) had none of the above abnormalities. This last subgroup of patients has not previously been well characterized but could represent limited deletions not detectable with the markers used or abnormalities in the imprinting process. These cases represent potentially valuable resources to elucidate more precisely the fundamental disorders responsible for PWS. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prader‐Willi syndrome and the evolution of human childhood

The kinship theory of genomic imprinting predicts that imprinted genes have effects on asymmetric kin (relatives with different degrees of matrilineal and patrilineal relatedness). The most important interaction with such a relative is a child's interaction with its mother. Therefore, the study of imprinted genes and their phenotypic effects promises to provide insights into the evolution of mother–child relations. Prader‐Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by the absence of expression of genes at 15q11–q13 that are normally expressed only when paternally derived. The kinship theory predicts that children with PWS will fail to express behaviors that have increased mothers' costs of child‐rearing. Our analysis focuses on aspects of the PWS phenotype that affect appetite and feeding. Immediately after birth, children with PWS have little appetite and are usually unable to suckle, but at some stage (usually within the first 2 years) they develop a voracious appetite and an obsession with food. We conjecture that this change in appetite reflects evolutionary forces associated with weaning. Immediately after birth, when a child is completely dependent on the breast, poor appetite reduced maternal costs. However, once a child was able to consume supplemental foods, maternal costs would have been reduced by children with increased, nonfastidious appetites. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 15:320–329, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Prader-Willi syndrome with a karyotype 47,XY,+min(15)(pter->q11.1:) and maternal UPD 15--case report plus review of similar cases

Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) are syndromes of developmental impairment that can result either from a 15q11-q13 deletion, paternal uniparental disomy (UPD), imprinting, or UBE3A mutations. A small cytogenetic subset of PWS and AS patients are carriers of a so-called small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC). Here, we report on an previously unreported PWS case with a karyotype 47,XY,+min(15)(pter->q11.1:) plus maternal heterodisomic UPD 15. A review of the literature revealed, that for both, PWS and AS patients, cases with (1) a sSMC plus microdeletion of the PWS/AS critical region, (2) inv dup(15) plus uniparental disomy (UPD) 15 and (3) cases without exclusion of a microdeletion an UBE3A mutation or UPD are described. The present case as well as the review of similar cases provides further evidence for the necessity to test UPD in prenatal cases with a de novo sSMC and in postnatal cases with otherwise unexplainable clinical phenotype.     

Establishment of the first WHO international genetic reference panel for Prader Willi and Angelman syndromes

Prader Willi and Angelman syndromes are clinically distinct genetic disorders both mapping to chromosome region 15q11-q13, which are caused by a loss of function of paternally or maternally inherited genes in the region, respectively. With clinical diagnosis often being difficult, particularly in infancy, confirmatory genetic diagnosis is essential to enable clinical intervention. However, the latter is challenged by the complex genetics behind both disorders and the unmet need for characterised reference materials to aid accurate molecular diagnosis. With this in mind, a panel of six genotyping reference materials for Prader Willi and Angelman syndromes was developed, which should be stable for many years and available to all diagnostic laboratories. The panel comprises three Prader Willi syndrome materials (two with different paternal deletions, and one with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD)) and three Angelman syndrome materials (one with a maternal deletion, one with paternal UPD or an epigenetic imprinting centre defect, and one with a UBE3A point mutation). Genomic DNA was bulk-extracted from Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines established from consenting patients, and freeze-dried as aliquots in glass ampoules. In total, 37 laboratories from 26 countries participated in a collaborative study to assess the suitability of the panel. Participants evaluated the blinded, triplicate materials using their routine diagnostic methods against in-house controls or externally sourced uncertified reference materials. The panel was established by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of the World Health Organization as the first International Genetic Reference Panel for Prader Willi and Angelman syndromes.     

Mosaic maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15 in Prader–Willi syndrome: Utility of genome‐wide SNP array

Prader–Willi syndrome is caused by the loss of paternal gene expression on 15q11.2–q13.2, and one of the mechanisms resulting in Prader–Willi syndrome phenotype is maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15. Various mechanisms including trisomy rescue, monosomy rescue, and post fertilization errors can lead to uniparental disomy, and its mechanism can be inferred from the pattern of uniparental hetero and isodisomy. Detection of a mosaic cell line provides a unique opportunity to understand the mechanism of uniparental disomy; however, mosaic uniparental disomy is a rare finding in patients with Prader–Willi syndrome. We report on two infants with Prader–Willi syndrome caused by mosaic maternal uniparental disomy 15. Patient 1 has mosaic uniparental isodisomy of the entire chromosome 15, and Patient 2 has mosaic uniparental mixed iso/heterodisomy 15. Genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphism array was able to demonstrate the presence of chromosomally normal cell line in the Patient 1 and trisomic cell line in Patient 2, and provide the evidence that post‐fertilization error and trisomy rescue as a mechanism of uniparental disomy in each case, respectively. Given its ability of detecting small percent mosaicism as well as its capability of identifying the loss of heterozygosity of chromosomal regions, genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphism array should be utilized as an adjunct to the standard methylation analysis in the evaluation of Prader–Willi syndrome. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Modification of 15q11 -- q13 DNA methylation imprints in unique Angelman and Prader -- Willi patients

The clearest example of genomic Imprinting in humans comes fromstudies of the Angelman (AS) and Prader—Wil (PWS) syndromes.Although these are clinically distinct disorders, both typicallyresult from a loss of the same chromosomal region, 15q11 - q13.AS usually results from either a maternal deletion of this region,or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD; both chromosomes 15 Inheritedfrom the father). PWS results from paternal deletion of 15q11- q13 or maternal UPD of chromosome 15. We have recently describeda parent-specific DNA methylation imprint in a gene at the D15S9locus (new gene symbol, ZNF 127), within the 15q11 - q13 region,that identifies AS and PWS patients with either a deletion orUPD. Here we describe an AS sibship and three PWS patients inwhich chromosome 15 rearrangements alter the methylation stateat ZNF127, even though this locus is not directly involved inthe rearrangement. Parent-specific DNA methylation imprintsare also altered at ZNF127 and D15S63 (another locus with aparent-specific methylation imprint) in an AS sibship whichhave no detectable deletion or UPD of chromosome 15. These uniquepatients may provide insight into the imprinting process thatoccurs in proximal chromosome 15 in humans.