Impact of a Pilot School-Based Nutrition Intervention on Fruit and Vegetable Waste at School Lunches

ObjectiveTo determine the preliminary impact of the Brighter Bites nutrition intervention on decreasing fruit and vegetable (F&V) waste at school lunches among fourth- and fifth-grade children.MethodThis was a nonrandomized pre–post-controlled study in Houston and Dallas, TX. Two schools received the Brighter Bites intervention (n = 76), and 1 comparison school (n = 39), during the 2017-2018 school year. Brighter Bites is a 16-week school-based nutrition intervention providing weekly distribution of fresh F&V plus nutrition education. Main outcome measures were direct observation and weights to measure the number of F&V dishes selected at school lunches, amount of F&V wasted (gm), and related nutrient waste (4 time points/child). Mixed-effects linear regression analysis was used to determine change in F&V selection and waste over time.ResultsThere was a significant decrease over time in proportion of F&V selected among those in the comparison school, but not the intervention schools (P < .001). Compared with children in the comparison group, those receiving Brighter Bites showed a significant decrease in the amount of F&V wasted at each meal (P < .001) and per item (P < .05) at the end of both 8 and 16 weeks of intervention. There were significant decreases in waste of energy (kcal); dietary fiber (gm); vitamins B₁, B₃, and B₆ (mg); total folate (µg); and B₁₂ (µg) among those receiving Brighter Bites (P < .05).Conclusions and ImplicationsAlthough absolute food or nutrient changes were small even when significant, programs such as Brighter Bites may contribute to a healthy intake. Future studies are warranted that include a larger sample size with a stringent, cluster-randomized control trial design and consideration for other covariates.     

The Association between Food Insecurity and Diet Quality Varies by Race/Ethnicity: An Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014 Results

BackgroundFood insecurity is believed to influence the quality and quantity of foods consumed; however, studies examining food insecurity and diet quality have been inconclusive and few studies have explored variability in these associations by sex and race/ethnicity.ObjectiveThis study examined associations between food insecurity and diet quality, and variations by sex and race/ethnicity.DesignCross-sectional analysis of data from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.ParticipantsThe study population was composed of 4,393 adults (aged 20 to 65 years) with family incomes ≤300% of the federal poverty level with complete data on household food security and dietary intake via two 24-hour dietary recalls.Main outcome measuresDiet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2015.Statistical analyses performedAssociations between food insecurity and Healthy Eating Index-2015 total and component scores were examined using linear regression models and generalized linear models. Models adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates.ResultsCompared with food-secure adults, food-insecure adults reported a 2.22-unit lower Healthy Eating Index-2015 score (95% CI –3.35 to –1.08). This association was most pronounced among non-Hispanic whites and adults of Asian or other races/ethnicities. There were no associations among non-Hispanic black or Hispanic adults, and no differences by sex. Among non-Hispanic whites, food insecurity was associated with lower scores for total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, and added sugar. Among Asians, food insecurity was associated with lower scores for whole fruit.ConclusionsFood insecurity was associated with lower diet quality primarily among non-Hispanic whites; Asians; and other adults, a group composed of American Indian or Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders, and multiracial adults. Further research is needed to better understand the nature of this association among understudied racial/ethnic groups.     

Frozen stored Leishmania tropica vaccine: the effects of dose,route of administration and storage on the evolution of the clinical lesion. Two field trials in the Israel Defense Forces

The first field trial of frozen vaccine against cutaneous leishmaniasis yielded a 100% take rate and a high ulceration rate at a dose of four million units. Two further trials were designed to investigate differences in response rates on the basis of duration of storage, sex of vaccinee, vaccination dose and method of administration.257 soliders (151 males and 106 females) were inoculated in 1978 with an isolate of Leishmania tropica major that had been stored at the temperature of liquid nitrogen for 11 months before use. Those inoculated with an intradermal jet injector and those receiving half a million units by conventional injection yielded very low take rates. For those receiving two million and one million units, no difference in response was demonstrated between males and females or between doses. The over-all take rate for these groups after six months of follow-up was 71·6% with an ulceration rate of only 23·7%.In a subsequent trial in 1979, 131 men were inoculated with one of two frozen isolates of L. tropica major that had been stored for 11 and 18 months, respectively, at doses of either two million or four million units. The take rate after 12 months of follow-up was 91% and 93% for the four and two million units dose, respectively. The corresponding ulceration rates were 39·5% and 25%. The lesions produced by the higher dose developed more rapidly than those produced by the lower dose. The ability of the parasites to produce lesions rapidly with high ulceration rates appears to decline during prolonged storage, even in the frozen state.