The incidence and predictors of HBV relapse after cessation of tenofovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients

This study investigates the incidences and predictors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and ‐negative patients. We retrospectively recruited 143 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without cirrhosis (39 HBeAg‐positive and 104 HBeAg‐negative patients) who were previously treated with TDF and had post‐treatment follow‐up for at least 6 months (median: 55, IQR 36‐85 weeks). All the patients fulfilled the stopping criteria of APASL 2012. The virological and clinical relapse rates at 104 weeks in HBeAg‐positive patients were 66.6% and 59.1%, while they were 72.3% and 55.9%, respectively, in HBeAg‐negative patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that the higher end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels were an independent factor of virological relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients. The end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels of 200 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.624) and 80 IU/mL (AUROC: 0.959) were the optimal values for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients, respectively. The virological relapse rate at 78 weeks was 14.3% and 19.6% in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients who achieved HBsAg ≤200 IU/mL and HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL, respectively. Two patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon hepatitis flares, and no patient died after timely retreatment. Seven patients experienced off‐therapy HBsAg loss. The cumulative rates of HBsAg loss at 104 weeks were 45.5% and 59.3% in patients with end‐of‐treatment HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL and ≤50 IU/mL, respectively. In conclusions, the end‐of‐treatment HBsAg levels were a useful marker for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB patients.     

Switching to peginterferon for chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion on entecavir – A prospective study

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are effective in suppressing hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, but most patients require long‐term treatment. This study aimed to investigate switching to peginterferon as a strategy to stop NA. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who developed HBeAg seroconversion during NA treatment were studied. All patients received open‐label peginterferon alfa‐2a 180 μg/wk for 48 weeks, and NA was stopped at week 4 of peginterferon treatment. The primary endpoint was sustained response, which was defined as negative HBeAg, positive anti‐HBe and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL at week 72. Other secondary endpoints including HBsAg loss at week 72 were also studied. Forty‐one patients treated with entecavir for 56 ± 23 months were recruited. Sustained response was achieved in 30 patients (73%, 95% confidence interval 58%‐84%). At week 72, 31 (76%) patients had HBeAg seroconversion, 56 (23%) patients had undetectable HBV DNA, 31 (76%) patients had normal ALT, and 6 patients (15%) had HBsAg loss. Baseline HBsAg level was the best predictor for both sustained response and HBsAg loss; the best HBsAg cut‐off for sustained response was <1500 IU/mL and that for HBsAg loss was <500 IU/mL by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Twenty‐two of 25 (88%) patients with baseline HBsAg <1500 IU/mL had sustained response. Five of 10 (50%) patients with baseline HBsAg <500 IU/mL developed HBsAg loss. Switching to peginterferon can be considered as a treatment option in NA‐treated patients with HBeAg seroconversion, particularly among those with lower HBsAg levels.     

HBsAg and HBcrAg as predictors of HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg‐positive patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues

HBeAg seroconversion marks an important spontaneous change and treatment end‐point for HBeAg‐positive patients and is a pre‐requisite for HBsAg loss or functional cure. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to identify predictors of seroconversion using serum quantitative HBsAg and HBcrAg, in HBeAg‐positive patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Data and samples from 118 HBeAg‐positive adults (genotypes A‐G) started on NA between Jan 2005 and Sept 2016 were retrospectively analysed at several time‐points. The predictive power of on‐treatment levels of HBsAg and HBcrAg was determined using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and cut‐off values determined by maximized Youden's index. About 36.4% of patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion after a median of 39 months’ treatment. On treatment kinetics of HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBcrAg differed between HBeAg seroconverters and nonseroconverters. A combination of HBsAg and HBcrAg had the greatest predictive value for HBeAg seroconversion: at 6 months, HBsAg of 3.9 log₁₀ IU/mL and HBcrAg of 5.7 log₁₀ U/mL had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 79.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 65.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 83.8%, with AUROC of 0.769 (0.668, 0.869; 95%CI), and at 12 months, HBsAg 3.8 log₁₀ IU/mL and HBcrAg 5.5 log₁₀ U/mL had a sensitivity of 73.7%, specificity of 79.5%, PPV of 63.6% and NPV of 86.1%, with AUROC 0.807 (0.713, 0.901; 95% CI). In conclusion, our results may be used to identify patients who are unlikely to achieve treatment end‐points, which will be important as the future management of chronic hepatitis B looks to therapies that offer functional cure.     

HBsAg loss after peginterferon‐nucleotide combination treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: 5 years of follow‐up

Combining peginterferon‐alfa‐2a (pegIFN) with a nucleotide analogue can result in higher rates of HBsAg loss than either therapy given alone. Here, we investigated the durability of the response to combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after 5 years of follow‐up. In the initial study, 92 CHB patients (44 HBeAg‐positive, 48 HBeAg‐negative) with HBV DNA >100 000 c/mL (~20 000 IU/mL) and active hepatitis were treated for 48 weeks with pegIFN 180 μg/week and 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil daily. For the long‐term follow‐up (LTFU) study, patients were followed up for 5 years after the end of treatment. At year 5, 70 (32 HBeAg‐positive, 38 HBeAg‐negative) patients remained in the study. At year 5, 19% (6/32) of HBeAg‐positive patients and 16% (6/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients lost HBsAg, and no HBsAg seroreversion was observed. The 5‐year cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for HBsAg loss was 17.2% for HBeAg‐positive patients and 19.3% for HBeAg‐negative patients. Fourteen of sixteen patients who lost HBsAg at any time point during follow‐up developed anti‐HBs antibodies (>10 IU/L). At year 5, in total 63% (20/32) of HBeAg‐positive and 71% (27/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients were retreated with nucleos(t)ide analogues during follow‐up. The cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for retreatment was 60% of patients at year 5. At year 5 of follow‐up, 18% of CHB patients treated with pegIFN/nucleotide analogue combination therapy had durable HBsAg loss and 88% of these had developed anti‐HBs antibodies.     

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen levels after HBeAg seroconversion is associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel serological marker for hepatitis B virus infection. Its clinical significance after HBeAg seroconversion has not been defined. We aimed to determine the relationship between HBcrAg levels after spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 207 chronic hepatitis B patients with documented time of HBeAg seroconversion were enrolled. HBcrAg and HBsAg were checked within 3 years (as baseline), at 5 and 10 years after HBeAg seroconversion. HBV DNA was measured at the baseline. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to investigate the predictors for HCC development. The median follow‐up time was 13.1 (11.8‐15.5) years. Fourteen patients developed HCC (15‐year cumulative incidence: 7%). The median level of HBcrAg at baseline was significantly higher in patients who developed HCC when compared with patients without HCC (5.68 vs 4.78 log U/ml, respectively; P = .003). Cox proportional hazards model indicated that age of HBeAg seroconversion older than 40 years (hazard ratio (HR): 4.60; P = .049), presence of baseline cirrhosis (HR: 6.23; P = .003) and a higher baseline HBcrAg (HR: 1.75; P = .032) were independently associated with HCC development. A cut‐off value of baseline HBcrAg level ≥5.21 log U/mL yielded an AUROC of 0.74 with a negative predictive value of 97.7%. High HBcrAg levels within 3 years after HBeAg seroconversion were independently associated with the development of HCC in chronic hepatitis B patients.     

Prediction of response to entecavir therapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B based on on-treatment HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels

Summary. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) assays are emerging as effective tools of on‐treatment predictors of response to antiviral agents, in addition to monitoring serum HBV DNA levels. However, the dynamic relationship between quantitative HBsAg, as well as HBeAg and HBV DNA, and the predictability of subsequent clinical outcomes during entecavir (ETV) therapy remain unclear. Eighty‐two patients with HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) received ETV therapy for ≥3 years. Virologic response (VR) after 3 years of ETV therapy was achieved in 73 (89.0%) patients. Among baseline and on‐treatment factors, on‐treatment HBV DNA levels performed better with respect to the prediction of response than HBsAg and HBeAg levels. Especially, the performance of absolute values of HBV DNA with respect to response was superior to HBV DNA decline from the baseline. The best predictive value was an absolute HBV DNA level of 2.3 log₁₀ IU/mL at month 6 (areas under the curve [AUROC], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.940–1.000; P < 0.001). HBeAg seroconversion after 3 years of therapy was achieved in 26 (31.7%) patients. On‐treatment HBeAg levels performed better with respect to the prediction of seroconversion than HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. The best cut‐off value for the HBeAg level at month 12 for the prediction of seroconversion was 0.62 log₁₀ PEIU/mL. Although the HBsAg level at baseline is often used to predict the antiviral potency of entecavir, on‐treatment HBV DNA and HBeAg levels are more helpful for prediction of subsequent clinical outcomes in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients with entecavir treatment.     

Loss of intrahepatic HBsAg expression predicts sustained response to peginterferon and is reflected by pronounced serum HBsAg decline

There is a lack of knowledge regarding the effect of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) on the expression of intrahepatic hepatitis B core and surface antigen (HBcAg and HBsAg) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and its relation with response to therapy. Fifty‐two HBeAg‐positive and 67 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with paired liver biopsies taken at baseline and after 1 year of PEG‐IFN therapy were studied. After PEG‐IFN therapy, HBeAg‐negative patients showed a significant reduction in both intrahepatic HBcAg (P = 0.04) and HBsAg expression (P < 0.001). In contrast, a reduction in intrahepatic HBcAg expression was not observed in HBeAg‐positive patients, while a trend in reduction of intrahepatic HBsAg staining was found (P = 0.09). Post‐treatment, 7 (13%) HBeAg‐positive and 9 (14%) HBeAg‐negative patients had no expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Patients without any intrahepatic HBsAg expression post‐treatment were more likely to achieve a combined response (HBeAg loss with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2000 IU/mL for HBeAg ‐positive and HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase for HBeAg‐negative CHB): 71% vs 5% for HBeAg‐positive (P < 0.001) and 60% vs 16% for HBeAg‐negative patients (P = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, a more profound decline of serum HBsAg was observed in patients with absence of intrahepatic HBsAg staining (3.1 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P < 0.001 and 1.7 vs 0.4 log IU/mL, P = 0.005 for HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB, respectively). In conclusion, PEG‐IFN reduces expression of intrahepatic HBsAg. Loss of HBsAg as assessed by immunohistochemistry from the liver predicts a sustained response and is reflected in a pronounced serum HBsAg decline.     

Serum HBsAg kinetics and usefulness of interferon‐inducible protein 10 serum in HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

The kinetics of serum HBsAg and interferon‐inducible protein 10 (IP10) levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection treated with tenofovir are unclear. We evaluated the changes of HBsAg levels and the predictability of IP10 for HBsAg decline in 160 HBeAg‐negative patients receiving tenofovir for ≥12 months. Serum samples taken before and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after tenofovir were tested for HBsAg levels. In 104 patients, serum samples before tenofovir were tested for IP10 levels. Compared to before tenofovir, HBsAg levels decreased by a median of 0.08, 0.11, 0.24, 0.33 and 0.38 log₁₀ IU/mL at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, respectively (P < 0.001). HBsAg kinetics did not differ between nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) naive and experienced patients. The 12‐, 24‐, 36‐ and 48‐month cumulative rates of ≥0.5 log₁₀ HBsAg decline were 8%, 16%, 24% and 41% and of HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL were 9%, 12%, 14% and 18%, respectively. The only factor associated with HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL was lower HBsAg levels before tenofovir (P < 0.001), while HBsAg decline ≥0.5 log₁₀ was associated with higher IP10 levels (P = 0.002) and particularly with IP10 > 350 pg/mL (P < 0.001). In conclusion, tenofovir decreases serum HBsAg levels in both nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) naive and experienced patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B infection. After 4 years of therapy, HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL can be achieved in approximately 20% of patients, particularly in those with low baseline HBsAg levels. HBsAg decline is slow (≥0.5 log₁₀ in 40% of patients after 4 years) and is associated only with higher baseline serum IP10 levels.     

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen monitoring during peginterferon alfa treatment for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) level moderately correlates with cccDNA. We examined whether HBcrAg can add value in monitoring the effect of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Thus, serum HBcrAg level was measured in 133 HBeAg‐negative, mainly Caucasian CHB patients, treated with 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a. We assessed its association with response (ALT normalization & HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL) at week 72. HBcrAg level strongly correlated with HBV DNA level (r = 0.8, P < 0.001) and weakly with qHBsAg and ALT (both r = 0.2, P = 0.01). At week 48, mean HBcrAg decline was ?3.3 log U/mL. Baseline levels were comparable for patients with and without response at week 72 (5.0 vs 4.9 log U/mL, P = 0.59). HBcrAg decline at week 72 differed between patients with and without response (?2.4 vs ?1.0 log U/mL, P = 0.001), but no cut‐off could be determined. The pattern of decline in responders resembled that of HBV DNA, but HBcrAg decline was weaker (HBcrAg ?2.5 log U/mL; HBV DNA: ?4.0 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). For early identification of nonresponse, diagnostic accuracy of HBV DNA and qHBsAg decline at week 12 (AUC 0.742, CI‐95% [0.0.629‐0.855], P < 0.001) did not improve by adding HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.747, CI‐95% [0.629‐0.855] P < 0.001), nor by replacing HBV DNA decline by HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.754, CI‐95% [0.641‐0.867], P < 0.001). In conclusion, in Caucasian patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB, decline of HBcrAg during PEG‐IFN treatment was stronger in patients with treatment response. However, HBcrAg was not superior to HBV DNA and qHBsAg in predicting response during PEG‐IFN treatment.     

Relationship between hepatitis B core‐related antigen levels and sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with nucleo(s)tide analogues

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion experienced during nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) therapy is often not sustained. We aimed to study whether hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) levels predict sustained HBeAg seroconversion in patients treated with NUCs. We studied HBeAg‐positive patients treated with NUCs for at least 6 months. We quantified HBcrAg at baseline and at the time of HBeAg seroconversion and studied the relationship with HBeAg seroconversion and subsequent relapse. HBcrAg was quantified at baseline in 196 patients; levels varied significantly by HBV genotype and correlated with HBsAg, HBV DNA and HBeAg. Baseline HBcrAg levels were lower in patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion than in those who did not; the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.656‐0.980, P = 0.031); and this association was not sustained in multivariate analysis. HBcrAg remained detectable in all patients at the time of HBeAg seroconversion. Higher HBcrAg at the time of seroconversion was an independent predictor of relapse (adjusted HR: 1.855 (95% CI: 1.099‐3.133, P = 0.021), and none of the patients with HBcrAg < 4.90 log U/mL experienced relapse. Baseline HBcrAg is not an independent predictor of HBeAg seroconversion during NUC therapy. HBcrAg remains detectable in patients after HBeAg seroconversion. Patients with lower levels at the time of seroconversion have a higher probability of sustained HBeAg seroconversion.     

Serum hepatitis B core‐related antigen is an effective tool to categorize patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

The discrimination between active chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and the clinically quiescent infection (CIB) is not always easy, as a significant portion of patients falls in a “grey” zone. Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) is a now quantifiable serological marker with potential applications in diagnosis and therapy monitoring. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the HBcrAg serum levels in HBeAg‐negative HBV infection, and its ability in identifying the clinical profile, in comparison with HBsAg serum levels. HBcrAg was retrospectively assessed on serum samples from a population of treatment‐naive HBeAg‐negative patients by ChemiLuminescent Enzyme Immunoassay (CLEIA). HBsAg and HBV‐DNA data were collected. Serological data were associated to clinical profile, defined in the subsequent follow‐up of at least 1 year. In the overall population of 160 HBeAg‐negative patients, HBcrAg results weakly correlated with qHBsAg levels (Spearman r = 0.471, P < 0.0001) and correlated closely with HBV‐DNA (Spearman r = 0.746, P < 0.0001). HBcrAg levels were significantly higher in 85 CHB patients relative to 75 CIB carriers. A value of 2.5 logU/mL produced the optimal cut‐off to identify CIB patients, with diagnostic accuracy comparable to HBsAg levels. In long‐term clinical evaluation, a single measurement of HBcrAg at the established cut‐off was optimally consistent with clinical outcome. Conversely, the HBsAg cut‐off performed well in the true quiescent phase and less in more difficult‐to‐categorize patients. In conclusion, single‐point use of HBcrAg serum levels provides an accurate identification of CIB and represents a useful tool for patient classification.     

Long‐term entecavir therapy results in falls in serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels and seroclearance in nucleos(t)ide‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

Entecavir (ETV) is reported to result in suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) replication with minimal drug resistance. However, information on the long‐term effect of such therapy on serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level and elimination of HBsAg is not available. ETV therapy was started in 553 nucleos(t)ide‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (HBeAg positive: 45%) in our hospital. Serum HBsAg levels were measured serially by the Architect assay. The median baseline HBsAg was 2180 IU/mL (0.12–243 000 IU/mL), and median follow‐up period was 3.0 years, with 529, 475, 355, 247 and 163 patients followed‐up for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. At year 5, the mean log HBsAg decline from baseline was −0.48 log IU/mL, and the cumulative HBsAg clearance rate was 3.5%. Multivariate analysis identified HBV DNA level at baseline (<3.0 log copies IU/mL, odd ratio = 10.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.87–55.5, P = 0.007) and HBsAg level (<500 IU/mL, odd ratio = 29.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.80–333, P = 0.005) as independent predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. These results indicate that although serum HBsAg level declines gradually during ETV therapy, HBsAg seroclearance remains a rare event.     

Entecavir maleate versus entecavir in Chinese chronic hepatitis B predominantly genotype B or C: Results at week 144

Reports on the efficacy and safety of long‐term entecavir treatment in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) predominantly genotype B or C are insufficient. This study presents the efficacy and safety of entecavir maleate in Chinese CHB patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 48‐week treatment with either 0.5 mg/day entecavir (group A) or 0.5 mg/day entecavir maleate (group B), and then all patients received treatment with 0.5 mg/day entecavir maleate from week 49. Two hundred and seventy‐five patients with CHB (HBeAg‐positive: 218) were analysed, predominantly (98.5%) with genotype B or C. Baseline characteristics were balanced. For the HBeAg‐positive CHB patients, the mean HBV DNA level decreased similarly (A: by 6.36 log₁₀ IU/mL vs B: by 6.31 log₁₀ IU/mL) between groups at week 144. The percentages of patients who achieved undetectable HBV DNA were similar (A: 70.59% vs B: 66.67%) between groups. Similar HBeAg loss rates (A: 43.53% vs B: 40.23%; P>.05) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (A: 21.52% vs B: 21.18%) were achieved. For the HBeAg‐negative CHB patients, similar reductions in HBV DNA levels from baseline (A: by 6.13 log₁₀ IU/mL vs B: by 5.65 log₁₀ IU/mL) and percentages of patients who achieved undetectable HBV DNA (A: 100% vs B: 100%) were achieved. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. In conclusions, 48‐week administration of entecavir maleate and entecavir showed similar efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with CHB. Long‐term entecavir maleate treatment was effective and safe in CHB patients.     

Predictors of sustained functional cure in hepatitis B envelope antigen‐negative patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance with interferon‐alpha–based therapy

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is considered a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the durability of HBsAg loss after stopping treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the sustained functional cure achieved by interferon therapy in hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐negative CHB patients. In this prospective study, 176 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with functional cure were enrolled for 12 weeks of cessation treatment, and treatment information and baseline data were collected. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) biomarkers and clinical biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months; liver imaging examinations were performed every 3‐6 months during the 48‐week follow‐up. The sustained functional cure was evaluated. After the 48‐week follow‐up, the sustained functional cure rate was 86.63%. The cumulative rates of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion were 12.79% and 2.33%, respectively. Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks after HBsAg loss achieved a significantly higher rate of sustained functional cure and significantly lower rate of HBsAg reversion than consolidation treatment < 12 weeks (76.19% vs 90.00%, P = 0.022 and 23.81% vs 9.23%, P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) had higher rate of sustained functional cure than patients achieving HBsAg loss but without HBsAb (89.86% vs 73.53%, P = 0.012). Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 16.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.135‐127.151; P = 0.007) and high HBsAb levels (OR 8.312; 95% CI, 1.824‐37.881; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sustained functional cure. Results suggested that 12 weeks of consolidation therapy after HBsAg clearance and elevated HBsAb levels help to improve functional cure.     

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen,hepatitis B e‐antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon‐α‐2b therapy in hepatitis B e‐antigen‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy. Methods: Thirty HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α‐2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis. Results: VR at 48 weeks post‐treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non‐responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log₁₀ HBsAg and log₁₀ HBeAg correlated well with those of log₁₀ cccDNA and log₁₀ total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log₁₀ sample to cut‐off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.     

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen and E antigen: correlation between Elecsys and Architect assays

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and their change model during treatment are emerging as a useful tool for assessing the outcome of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and predicting the efficacy of antiviral therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Elecsys and Architect assays for HBsAg and HBeAg quantification. Quantification of HBsAg and HBeAg, determined by these two assays, were assessed in 1292 sera from patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB). HBeAg quantification in serum was performed by calibrating the results through HBeAg Paul‐Ehrlich international (PEI) reference standard. The HBV genotype was determined by direct sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Of 1292 samples, the distribution of genotype was 514 (39.78%) genotype B, 776 (60.06%) genotype C, 2 (0.16%) genotype D. The results of HBsAg and HBeAg quantification between the Architect and Elecsys assays were significantly correlated (HBsAg: r = 0.939; HBeAg: r = 0.987), independent of HBV genotype and treatment phase. The mean differences between the two methods (the log₁₀ [Elecsys] ‐ the log₁₀ [Architect]) were 0.075 log₁₀ IU/mL and ?0.149 log₁₀PE IU/mL in quantifying HBsAg and HBeAg, respectively. This study demonstrates a high correlation between the Elecsys and the Architect assays in quantifying HBsAg and HBeAg, regardless of HBV genotype. Both the two assays can be used to monitor the HBsAg and HBeAg levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B.     

Serum HBcrAg is better than HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA

The correlation between serum HBcrAg and HBV RNA is unclear, and correlations of intrahepatic cccDNA with HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg are rarely reported in the same cohort. This study aimed to assess the correlation of HBcrAg with HBV RNA and HBsAg, and investigate whether serum HBcrAg is superior to serum HBV RNA and HBsAg in reflecting intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative CHB patients. In this study, 85 HBeAg‐positive and 25 HBeAg‐negative patients who have never received antiviral therapy were included. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, HBcrAg was correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.564, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (r = 0.445, P < 0.001), and HBV RNA was also correlated positively with HBsAg (r = 0.323, P = 0.003). Among HBeAg‐negative patients, no significant correlation was observed between HBcrAg, HBsAg and HBV RNA. By multivariable linear regression, HBcrAg (β = ?0.563, P < 0.001), HBsAg (β = ?0.328, P < 0.001) and HBV RNA (β = 0.180, P = 0.003) were all associated with cccDNA levels among HBeAg‐positive patients, but only serum HBcrAg was associated with cccDNA level (β = 0.774, P = 0.000) among HBeAg‐negative patients. HBcrAg was better correlated with cccDNA as compared to HBsAg and HBV RNA, irrespective of HBeAg status. Among HBeAg‐positive patients, though HBcrAg level was influenced by hepatic inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels, the good correlations of HBcrAg with cccDNA persisted after stratification by inflammatory activity and HBV DNA levels. In conclusion, correlations of serum HBcrAg, HBV RNA and HBsAg levels differ significantly between HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients, but serum HbcrAg correlates with cccDNA levels better than HBV RNA and HBsAg, irrespective of HBeAg status.     

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays in hepatitis B virus carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional assays

Aim

We investigated the utility of high‐sensitivity hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays compared with conventional HBsAg assays.

Methods

Using serum samples from 114 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.05 IU/mL), the amount of HBsAg was re‐examined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays (cut‐off value, 0.005 IU/mL). Cases negative for HBsAg in both assays were defined as consistent cases, and cases positive for HBsAg in the high‐sensitivity HBsAg assay only were defined as discrepant cases.

Results

There were 55 (48.2%) discrepant cases, and the range of HBsAg titers determined by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays was 0.005–0.056 IU/mL. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, liver cirrhosis, and negative anti‐HBs contributed to the discrepancies between the two assays. Cumulative anti‐HBs positivity rates among discrepant cases were 12.7%, 17.2%, 38.8%, and 43.9% at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates among consistent cases were 50.8%, 56.0%, 61.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity rates were 56.4% and 81.4% at baseline, 51.3% and 83.3% at 1 year, and 36.8% and 95.7% at 3 years, among discrepant and consistent cases, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen reversion was observed only in discrepant cases.

Conclusions

Re‐examination by high‐sensitivity HBsAg assays revealed that HBsAg was positive in approximately 50% of cases. Cumulative anti‐HBs seroconversion rates and HBV‐DNA seroclearance rates were lower in these cases, suggesting a population at risk for HBsAg reversion.     

Hepatitis B surface antigen loss and sustained viral suppression in Asian chronic hepatitis B patients: A community‐based real‐world study

Community‐based real‐world outcomes on effectiveness of antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) in Asians are limited. Whether hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss correlates with undetectable virus and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization on treatment or what predicts risk of seroreversion or detectable virus after stopping therapy is unclear. We aim to evaluate rates and predictors of HBsAg loss, seroconversion, ALT normalization and undetectable HBV DNA, including HBsAg seroreversion or re‐emergence of HBV DNA among Asian CHB patients. We retrospectively evaluated 1072 CHB adults on antiviral therapy at two community gastroenterology clinics from 1997 to 2015. Rates of HBsAg loss, ALT normalization, achieving undetectable HBV DNA and developing surface antibody (anti‐HBs) were stratified by HBeAg status. Following HBsAg loss, HBsAg seroreversion or re‐emergence of detectable HBV DNA was analysed. With median treatment of 76.7 months, the overall rate of HBsAg loss was 4.58%, with similar HBsAg loss rates between HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients (4.44% vs 4.71%, P=.85) in a predominantly Asian population (98.1%). Among HBsAg loss patients, 33.3% developed anti‐HBs, 95.8% achieved undetectable virus and 66.0% normalized ALT. No significant baseline or on‐treatment predictors of HBsAg loss were observed. While six patients who achieved HBsAg loss had seroreversion with re‐emergence of HBsAg positivity, viral load remained undetectable, demonstrating the sustainability of viral suppression. Among a large community‐based real‐world cohort of Asian CHB patients treated with antiviral therapy, rate of HBsAg loss was 4.58%. Despite only 33.3% of HBsAg loss patients achieving anti‐HBs, nearly all patients achieved sustained undetectable virus.