Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as a Consolidative Strategy for the Treatment of Primary and Isolated Secondary Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas

IntroductionStandard consolidation for primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (CNS) (PCNSL) is not established. This single center, retrospective observational study aims to define the outcomes of consolidative high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) in patients with PCNSL and isolated secondary CNS DLBCL (SCNSL) and evaluate the prognostic factors.Patients and MethodsAll consecutive patients performed an HDC/ASCT for PCNSL or isolated SCNSLs between October 2012 and February 2022 were identified. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 35 patients included, 28 had PCNSL and 7 had isolated SCNSL. Median age was 51 (16-78). Males constituted 48.6%. Median follow-up after HDC/ASCT was 42.0 months. MATRIX (51.4%) and TEAM (80.0%) were the most frequent regimens of induction and conditioning, respectively. OS and PFS 1- and 2-year after HDC/ASCT were 68.0%, 57.0%, 58.0%, 48.0%, respectively. Increasing age, poor performance and comorbidities were associated with lower OS and PFS and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). Complete response (CR) 1 at HDC/ACST was independently associated with higher OS and PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 4.67 and 6.99, respectively].ConclusionIn patients < 60 years consolidative HDC/ASCT yields promising OS and PFS. Patients ≥ 60 years may less likely benefit from consolidative HDC/ASCT and should be studied further in trials of novel agents, lower doses of consolidative radiotherapy and dose-adjusted conditioning regimens. Not only age, but also comorbidities, clinical performance and response to induction correlate with outcomes. Patients with isolated SCNSL may achieve similar outcomes.     

Durable Survival Outcomes in Primary and Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been investigated in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with CNS involvement and has shown promising results.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 48 consecutive patients who had undergone HDC/ASCT with TBC (thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) conditioning for PCNSL (27 patients), secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) (8 patients), or relapsed disease with CNS involvement (13 patients) from July 2006 to December 2017. Of the 27 patients with PCNSL, 21 had undergone ASCT at first complete remission (CR1).ResultsThe 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9-92.9) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-92.7%) among all patients. The 2-year PFS and OS rate for patients with PCNSL in CR1 was 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%) and 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis of the patients with PCNSL, ASCT in CR1 was the only variable statistically significant for outcome (P = .007 for PFS; P = .008 for OS). Among patients with SCNSL or CNS relapse, the 2-year PFS and OS rate were comparable at 75.9% (95% CI, 59.5%-96.8%) and 75.3% (95% CI, 58.6%-98.6%), respectively. The most common side effects were febrile neutropenia (89.6%; of which 66.7% had an infectious etiology identified), nausea/vomiting (85.4%), diarrhea (93.8%), mucositis (89.6%), and electrolyte abnormalities (89.6%). Four patients (8.3%) died of treatment-related overwhelming infection; of these patients, 3 had SCNSL.ConclusionHDC and ASCT using TBC conditioning for both PCNSL and secondary CNS NHL appears to have encouraging long-term efficacy with manageable side effects.     

Correlation between O<Superscript>6</Superscript>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide

Epigenetic silencing of the O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by promoter methylation is correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who receive alkylating agents. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between MGMT and survival in elderly patients with GBM treated with radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Eighty-three patients aged 70 years or older with histologically confirmed GBM treated with RT plus TMZ between February 2005 and September 2009 were investigated in this study. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Median PFS and OS were 7.5 and 12.8 months, respectively. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 42 patients (50.6%) and unmethylated in 41 patients (49.4%). Median OS was 15.3 months in methylated patients and 10.2 months in unmethylated patients (P = 0.0001). Median PFS was 10.5 months in methylated tumors and 5.5 months in unmethylated tumors (P = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis MGMT methylation status emerged as the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). The results of the present study suggest that MGMT methylation status might be an important prognostic factor associated with better OS and PFS in elderly patients with GBM treated with RT and TMZ.     

Randomized phase II study evaluating veliparib (ABT-888) with temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma

BackgroundVeliparib (ABT-888) is a potent, orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor of the DNA repair enzymes poly ADP-ribose polymerase-1 and -2. Veliparib enhances the efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ) and other cytotoxic agents in preclinical tumor models.Patients and methodsIn this multicenter, double-blind trial, adults with unresectable stage III or IV metastatic melanoma were randomized 1:1:1 to TMZ plus veliparib 20 or 40 mg, or placebo twice daily. Efficacy end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).ResultsPatients (N = 346) were randomized between February 2009 and January 2010. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS was 3.7 (3.0–5.5), 3.6 (1.9–4.1), and 2 (1.9–3.7) months in the 20-mg, 40-mg, and placebo arms, respectively. Median (95% CI) OS was 10.8 (9.0–13.1), 13.6 (11.4–15.9), and 12.9 (9.8–14.3) months, respectively; ORR was 10.3%, 8.7%, and 7.0%. Exploratory analyses showed patients with low ERCC1 expression had longer PFS when TMZ was combined with veliparib. Toxicities were as expected for TMZ. The frequencies of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia were significantly increased in the veliparib groups. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, mainly hematologic toxicities, were seen in 55%, 63%, and 41% of patients in the 20-mg, 40-mg, and placebo arms, respectively.ConclusionsMedian PFS with 20 and 40 mg veliparib almost doubled numerically compared with placebo, but the improvements did not reach statistical significance. OS was not increased with veliparib. Toxicities were similar to TMZ monotherapy, but with increased frequency.     

Immunochemotherapy with rituximab,methotrexate, procarbazine,and lomustine for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) in the elderly

BackgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma confined to the central nervous system. In this article, we report the results of a pilot trial adding rituximab to the established regimen consisting of methotrexate, procarbazine, and lomustine (R-MCP).Design and methodsPCNSL patients ≥65 years without Karnofsky performance score (KPS) limit were included. R-MCP regimen consisted of rituximab (375 mg/m² i.v. on days -6, 1, 15, and 29), methotrexate (3 g/m² i.v., days 2, 16, and 30) followed by folinic rescue, procarbazine (60 mg/m² orally, days 2–11), and lomustine (110 mg/m² orally, day 2). A maximum of three 43-day cycles were applied. Primary end point was response to treatment obtained by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsTwenty-eight patients were included (median age 75, median KPS 60%). Best documented response: complete remission in 18 of 28 (64%), partial remission in 5 of 28 (18%), stable disease in 1 of 28 (4%), and progressive disease in 2 of 28 (7%) patients. Response was not assessed in two patients. Two treatment-associated deaths were observed. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year PFS and OS was 31%.ConclusionR-MCP regimen is well tolerated and active in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.     

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Series and a Review of the Literature

BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been reported to improve outcomes when used as a consolidation strategy in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and as a salvage strategy in patients with disease relapse limited to the CNS. Herein, we describe our experience of using ASCT in PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL).Patients and MethodsWe evaluated clinical outcomes of 18 patients from 2 major academic centers with a median age of 55 (range, 46-72) years. Thirteen patients had PCNSL and 5 patients had SCNSL. Most of the cases were in the first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission (CR1 = 7, CR2 = 7) at the time of ASCT. Carmustine with thiotepa (n = 12, 67%) was the most commonly prescribed preparative regimen.ResultsThe median follow-up from ASCT for surviving patients was 12 (range, 0.9-115) months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-99%) and 80% (95% CI, 55%-100%), respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality was 0%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 27% (95% CI, 10%-72%). In subgroup analysis of PCNSL patients, 2-year PFS, OS, and relapse were 71% (95% CI, 38%-100%), 71% (95% CI, 38%-100%), and 29% (95% CI, 9%-92%), respectively.ConclusionIn this retrospective study of patients with CNS lymphoma, consolidation with ASCT after high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy is safe and effective in reducing disease relapse.     

Phase II randomized study of whole-brain radiation therapy with or without concurrent temozolomide for brain metastases from breast cancer

BackgroundTo improve the therapeutic index of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer, we investigated the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in this population.Patients and methodsThis phase II multicenter prospective randomized study included patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal BMs from breast cancer, unsuitable for surgery or radiosurgery. All patients received conformal WBRT (3 Gy × 10–30 Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m²/day during the irradiation period. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) 6 weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (modified WHO criteria). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), neurologic symptoms, and tolerability.ResultsBetween February 2008 and November 2010, 100 patients were enrolled in the study (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). Median age was 55 years (29–79). Median follow-up was 9.4 months [1.0–68.1]. ORRs at 6 weeks were 36% in the WBRT arm and 30% in the WBRT + TMZ arm (NS). In the WBRT arm, median PFS was 7.4 months and median OS was 11.1 months. In the WBRT + TMZ arm, median PFS was 6.9 months and median OS was 9.4 months. Treatment was well tolerated in this arm: the most common ≥grade 2 acute toxicity was reversible lymphopenia.ConclusionWBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer.Clinicaltrials.govNCT00875355.     

Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy to primary tumor and metastatic locations in oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients

BackgroundStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment modality in patients presenting with oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SBRT is used as a local consolidative treatment to metastatic disease sites. The majority of patients included in SBRT trials for oligometastatic NSCLC have controlled primary tumors and brain metastases.Patients and methodsOligometastatic NSCLC patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions were included in a prospective phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations. SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) was carried out at baseline and 3 months after SBRT to evaluate the metabolic response rate according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method from start of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Side-effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0.ResultsTwenty-six patients received SBRT after induction chemotherapy (n = 17) or as a primary treatment (n = 9). Median follow-up was 16.4 months. Overall metabolic response rate was 60% with seven patients (30%) achieving a complete metabolic remission and 7 (30%) a partial metabolic response. Any acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in four patients (15%) and grade 3 pulmonary toxicity in two patients (8%). Median PFS and OS were 11.2 and 23 months. The 1-year PFS and 1-year OS rate were 45% and 67%, respectively.ConclusionSBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations, in oligometastatic NSCLC patients produced an acceptable median PFS of 11.2 months.     

Rituximab,methotrexate, procarbazine,vincristine and intensified cytarabine consolidation for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in the elderly: a LOC network study

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is chemosensitive to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. However, responses in the elderly are short-lasting and outcome is poor. Given that radiotherapy and intensive chemotherapy expose elderly to severe toxicities, alternative consolidation approaches need to be evaluated. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL, aged >60, treated with a (R)-MPV-AAA regimen. The regimen consisted of three 28-day cycles of methotrexate (3.5 g/m² D1, D15), procarbazine, vincristine, followed by three 28-day cycles of cytarabine consolidation (3 g/m² D1-2). Addition of rituximab (375 mg/m² D1) was optional. The results were compared with the historical MPV-A regimen. Ninety patients received the (R)-MPV-AAA regimen with (n?=?39) or without (n?=?51) rituximab. Median age was 68 and median KPS 60. 55% of patients achieved a complete response, 8% a partial response and 37% progressed. The median PFS was 10 months, the median OS 28.1 months. Toxicity was mainly hematological, with 54 and 51% of grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombopenia. The response rate was higher in patients receiving rituximab (77 vs. 53%; p?=?0.03), whereas no difference was observed in terms of PFS or OS. When comparing the results to the historical MPV-A, there was no difference in terms of response rate, PFS or OS, but a higher rate of hematotoxicity. This study suggests that extending cytarabine consolidation after methotrexate-based chemotherapy does not improve the MPV-A efficacy but increases toxicity in the elderly. The addition of rituximab may improve the response rate, but its impact on final outcome remains unclear.     

Prognostic factors in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer – A systematic review

AimOligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) is a disease-entity with potential for long-term remission in selected patients. Those with truly limited metastatic load (rather than occult widespread metastatic disease) may benefit from multimodality treatment including local ablative therapy of distant metastases. In this systematic review, we studied factors associated with long-term survival in patients with OMBC.MethodsEligible studies included patients with OMBC who received a combination of local and systemic therapy as multimodal approach and reported overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), or both. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the quality of each included study. Independent prognostic factors for OS and/or PFS are summarized.ResultsOf 1271 screened abstracts, 317 papers were full-text screened and twenty studies were included. Eleven of twenty studies were classified as acceptable quality. Definition of OMBC varied between studies and mostly incorporated the number and/or location of metastases. The 5-year OS ranged between 30 and 79% and 5-year PFS ranged between 25 and 57%. Twelve studies evaluated prognostic factors for OS and/or PFS in multivariable models. A solitary metastasis, >24 months interval between primary tumor and OMBC, no or limited involved axillary lymph nodes at primary diagnosis, and hormone-receptor positivity were associated with better outcome. HER2-positivity was associated with worse outcome, but only few patients received anti-HER2 therapy.ConclusionsOMBC patients with a solitary distant metastasis and >24 months disease-free interval have the best OS and may be optimal candidates to consider a multidisciplinary approach.     

A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma

PurposeSurvival rates for paediatric diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma (DIBSG) are dismal. Metronomic dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with standard radiotherapy may improve survival by increasing the therapeutic index and anti-angiogenic effect of TMZ. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in paediatric DIBSG patients.MethodsChildren aged 18 years or younger with newly diagnosed DIBSG were treated with standard radiotherapy and concomitant metronomic TMZ at 85 mg/m²/day for 6 weeks, followed by metronomic TMZ monotherapy at the same dose. Treatment was continued until tumour progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Primary endpoints included overall survival and toxicities. For patients who consented, plasma and urine samples were collected at diagnosis, post-induction and prior to each course of maintenance therapy for the quantification of angiogenesis markers.ResultsFifteen eligible patients were enrolled, with a median age of 6.4 years. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, most notably prolonged lymphopaenia and thrombocytopaenia. The only dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopaenia. Intratumoural haemorrhage was confirmed in one patient. Median time to progression was 5.13 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8). Six-months OS was 80% ± 10.3%, with a 1-year OS of 20% ± 10.3%. Serum levels of both VEGF and endoglin tended to decrease during the first two cycles of therapy.ConclusionChemoradiotherapy with metronomic dosing of TMZ showed similar toxicity to previous TMZ regimens, and does not appear to improve survival in paediatric DIBSG.     

Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy as a Standard of Care Provides Favorable Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients: A Multisite Real-Life Study

BackgroundLenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance improve long-term outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. However, there is less evidence to support bortezomib (BTZ) maintenance therapy, and real-life data on maintenance are scarce. We investigated the efficacy and safety of BTZ maintenance therapy in NDMM.Patients and MethodsA retrospective multisite study was performed in 6 medical centers in Israel. All consecutive patients with NDMM diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and July 3, 2019, who received a BTZ-based induction, with or without an autologous transplantation, followed by BTZ maintenance therapy, were identified. Maintenance therapy was defined as BTZ (1.3 mg/m²) once every 2 weeks, administered subcutaneously alone or with dexamethasone, or weekly BTZ monotherapy.ResultsA total of 105 patients were identified, 58 of whom had received a transplant (transplant eligible) and 47 who had not (not transplant eligible). During BTZ maintenance therapy, 96% had one or more adverse event, 11.5% had grade 3 or higher adverse events, and 11.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 45 and 91.5 months, respectively; 4-year survival was 88%. Adverse cytogenetics was associated with worse PFS (24 vs. 46 months, P = .001). In subgroup analysis, adverse cytogenetics were associated with worse PFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001) among transplant-ineligible but not transplant-eligible patients.ConclusionAnalysis of multisite real-life data showed that BTZ maintenance therapy is safe, well tolerated, and effective. Median PFS was similar to that reported with alternative maintenance strategies. Our findings further support its use among patients with adverse cytogenetics, it may also be relevant for patients with lenalidomide-intolerant disease.     

Prognosis after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in primary CNS lymphoma--a long-term follow-up study

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HCT–ASCT) is a promising approach in eligible patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We report long-term data of patients who were treated according to HCT–ASCT containing protocols.Patients and methodsWe analyzed survival and relapse rates in 43 (<67 years) immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL being treated according to two different high-dose methotrexate-based protocols followed by high-dose carmustine/thiotepa (BCNU/TT) plus ASCT (±whole brain irradiation). Analysis was conducted for all patients (intention-to-treat) and those patients who actually received HCT–ASCT (per-protocol).ResultsThirty-four patients achieved complete remission, of those 12 relapsed (35%), while 6 of them relapsed 5 years after diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 120 months, median overall survival (OS) was reached after 104 months. Two- and 5-year OS was 81% and 70% and 2- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 81% and 67%, respectively. In per-protocol analysis (N = 34), 5-year OS and EFS was 82% and 79%, respectively. HCT–ASCT associated related mortality was not observed.ConclusionsSequential high-dose MTX containing chemotherapy followed by high-dose carmustine/thiotepa plus ASCT (±whole brain irradiation) is safe and leads to high survival rates in eligible patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.     

Radiotherapy Plus Procarbazine,Lomustine, and Vincristine Versus Radiotherapy Plus Temozolomide for IDH-Mutant Anaplastic Astrocytoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the French POLA Cohort

Background IDH‐mutant anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs) are chemosensitive tumors for which the best choice of adjuvant chemotherapy between procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) or temozolomide (TMZ) after radiotherapy (RT) remains unclear.MethodsIn a large cohort of patients with histologically proven 2016 World Health Organization classification AA with IDH1/2 mutations included in the French national POLA cohort (n = 355), the primary objective was to compare progression‐free survival (PFS) between the two treatment regimens (n = 311). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression type, pseudoprogression rate, and toxicity.ResultsThe 4‐year PFS in the RT + PCV arm was 70.8% versus 53.5% in the RT + TMZ arm, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38–0.87; p = .0074) in univariable analysis and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41–0.97; p = .0348) in multivariable analysis. The 4‐year OS in the RT + PCV arm was 84.3% versus 76.6% in the RT + TMZ arm, with an HR of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.30–1.05; p = .0675) in univariable analysis. Toxicity was significantly higher in the RT + PCV arm with more grade ≥3 toxicity (46.7% vs. 8.6%, p < .0001).ConclusionRT + PCV significantly improved PFS compared with RT + TMZ for IDH‐mutant AA. However, RT + TMZ was better tolerated.Implications for PracticeIn the absence of fully conducted randomized trials comparing procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) with temozolomide (TMZ) in adjuvant treatment after radiotherapy (RT) for the management of IDH‐mutant anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and a similar level of evidence, these two chemotherapies are both equally recommended in international guidelines. This study in a national cohort of IDH‐mutant AA defined according the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification shows for the first time that the RT + PCV regimen significantly improves progression‐free survival in comparison with the RT + TMZ regimen. Even if at the time of analysis the difference in overall survival was not significant, this result provides new evidence for the debate about the chemotherapy regimen to prescribe in adjuvant treatment to RT for WHO 2016 IDH‐mutant AA.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Multiple Primary Lung Cancers

BackgroundPatients with multiple primary lung cancers increasingly receive multiple courses of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of such treatments.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed a prospective lung SBRT database of patients treated for stage I non–small-cell lung cancer between June 2004 and December 2015.ResultsA total of 374 patients received a single course of SBRT, 14 received synchronous SBRT, 48 received metachronous SBRT alone, and 108 received surgery and metachronous SBRT. Median follow-up was 37.0 months for survivors. Patients who received a single course had a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 54.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8-59.3), 3-year freedom from progression (FFP) of 67.3% (95% CI, 60.9-72.9), and grade 3 or higher toxicity of 3.5%. Compared to single-course patients, patients receiving metachronous SBRT alone and patients receiving surgery and metachronous SBRT had improved OS (79.7% [95% CI, 64.4-88.9%], P < .0001 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively) and FFP (85.8% [95% CI, 70.7-93.5], P = .03 and 95.4% [95% CI, 89.2-98.0%], P < .0001, respectively). Patients receiving synchronous SBRT had similar OS (46.4% [95% CI, 19.3-69.9%], P = .75) and similar FFP (57.5% [95% CI, 25.3-80.0%], P = .17) as single-course patients. There were no significant differences in rates of grade 3 or higher toxicity or of grade 1 or higher toxicity between single-course patients and the other groups.ConclusionPatients who received either synchronous or metachronous SBRT had no significant detriment in OS or toxicity compared to single-course patients. This supports the use of SBRT in patients with multiple primary lung cancers.     

42例原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者预后影响因素分析

背景与目的：原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤（primary central nervous system lymphoma,PCNSL）是发生在脑、脊髓、脑膜或眼的罕见侵袭型非霍奇金淋巴瘤,无CNS之外的部位累及。PCNSL与其他类型淋巴瘤相比,患者生存期短,预后差,且复发率高,未经治疗的患者的中位生存期仅为3个月。近年来研究发现C-MYC、BCL-2、BCL-6、Ki-67等指标在一定程度上影响PCNSL患者预后。因此,通过分析PCNSL相关蛋白表达、治疗方式及其他临床因素对患者预后的影响, 希望为该病的临床治疗及预后评价进一步积累资料。方法：回顾性分析自2013年6月—2021年5月于大连医科大学附属第二医院治疗的42例经病理学检查明确诊断为原发性中枢神经系统弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、病灶数量、美国东部肿瘤协作组（Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,ECOG）评分、血清乳酸脱氢酶（lactate dehydrogenase,LDH）、病灶是否累及深部脑组织、治疗方案、病理学Hans分型及C-MYC、BCL-2、BCL-6、Ki-67等生物标志物,结合随访调查,了解患者生存时间及生存状况,应用Kaplan-Meier法及log-rank检验分析影响患者无进展生存期（progression-free survival,PFS）和总生存期（overall survival,OS）的预后相关因素,多因素分析采用COX回归模型。结果：42例PCNSL患者中位发病年龄61岁,男女比例为1.33∶1.00,颅脑增强MRI病灶多呈均匀明显强化。所有患者均接受含有大剂量甲氨蝶呤（high-dose methotrexate,HD-MTX）方案化疗,治疗后评价完全缓解（complete response,CR）20例、部分缓解（partial response,PR）5例,疾病稳定（stable disease,SD）11例,疾病进展（progressive disease,PD）6例。中位PFS为21个月,中位OS为34个月,1年PFS率为63.7%,2年PFS率为47.0%;1年OS率为70.8%,2年OS率为55.6%。单因素分析结果显示,影响PFS的因素是HD-MTX多药联合化疗、鞘内化疗及联合利妥昔单抗。影响OS的因素是ECOG评分≥2、C-MYC（+）、BCL-2及C-MYC双表达、HD-MTX多药联合化疗、鞘内化疗及联合利妥昔单抗。多因素分析结果显示：利妥昔单抗治疗是影响PFS的独立预后因素（P=0.020）,ECOG评分、利妥昔单抗是影响OS的独立预后因素（P=0.007;P=0.046）。与未接受巩固治疗的患者相比,接受巩固治疗患者的中位PFS及OS较高;进一步的亚组分析显示,自体干细胞移植（autologous stem cell transplantation,ASCT）组的中位PFS及OS较全脑放疗（whole brain radiation therapy,WBRT）组高,但差异无统计学意义。结论：PCNSL多发于中老年人,男性多于女性,影像学缺乏特异性。ECOG评分≥2与PCNSL患者较差的OS相关。C-MYC（+）、BCL-2及C-MYC双表达可作为指导危险分层的预后标志物。以HD-MTX为基础的多药联合化疗已经成为PCNSL的首选治疗手段,利妥昔单抗的应用可延长生存期。在全身化疗的基础上,联合局部鞘内化疗可以改善预后。进一步的巩固治疗主要包括ASCT及WBRT,可延长PFS及OS,ASCT可以取得与WBRT相似的疗效,且可避免WBRT的晚期神经毒性,但本研究中因样本量及随访时间的限制,未得出明确的统计学结果。     

The CSF IL-10 concentration is an effective diagnostic marker in immunocompetent primary CNS lymphoma and a potential prognostic biomarker in treatment-responsive patients

IntroductionWe aimed to confirm the diagnostic value and to evaluate the pre- and post-therapeutic prognostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-6 in patients with diffuse large B-cell primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).Patients and methodsIL-10 and IL-6 concentrations were measured in 79 patients with PCNSL at diagnosis and in 40 control individuals. Fifty-four PCNSL patients underwent repeat assessments starting at diagnosis.ResultsThe IL-10 concentration distinguished PCNSL from other neurologic diseases with a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 88.9% with a cutoff of 4 pg/ml. In a multivariate analysis of PCNSL patients, CSF involvement was associated with a higher IL-10 concentration (mean log (IL-10) of 4.4 versus 2.5 pg/ml, respectively, p = 0.0004). The pre-therapeutic IL-10 concentration had no prognostic impact on outcome. The IL-10 concentration decreased after treatment for most patients tested. Among patients with complete remission or partial remission, as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a persistent detectable IL-10 level in the CSF at the end of treatment was associated with a negative impact on progression-free survival (PFS) (1-year PFS: 15%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5–38% versus 59%, 95% CI: 32–78%, respectively, p = 0.0004).ConclusionOur study confirmed that IL-10 is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of PCNSL. We highlight new findings showing that the IL-10 level in the CSF could be used as a surrogate marker for CSF involvement and that the post-treatment IL-10 concentration could complement standard MRI for therapeutic response assessment in PCNSL.     

First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients

BackgroundBevacizumab has consistently demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate when combined with first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the lack of a significant overall survival (OS) difference continues to attract debate, and identification of patients deriving greatest benefit from bevacizumab remains elusive.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from three randomised phase III trials in the first-line HER2-negative mBC setting were analysed, focusing specifically on efficacy in poor-prognosis patients.ResultsThe meta-analysis (n = 2447) demonstrated a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.71; median 9.2 months with bevacizumab versus 6.7 months with non-bevacizumab therapy) and response rate of 49% versus 32%, respectively. The OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.86–1.08); median 26.7 versus 26.4 months, respectively. In patients with triple-negative mBC, the HRs for PFS and OS were 0.63 (95% CI 0.52–0.76) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.79–1.16), respectively. Median PFS was 8.1 months with bevacizumab versus 5.4 months with chemotherapy alone, median OS was 18.9 versus 17.5 months, respectively, and 1-year OS rates were 71% versus 65%.ConclusionsBevacizumab improves efficacy, including 1-year OS rates, both overall and in subgroups of poor-prognosis patients with limited treatment options.     

Role of irradiation for patients over 80 years old with glioblastoma: a retrospective cohort study

To assess efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) in patients over 80 years old with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Between June 2009 and September 2015, patients in this population with a recommendation for radiation therapy from a multidisciplinary tumor board, and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60 as assessed by a radiation oncologist, who received HRT (40 Gy/15 fractions)?±?concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 21 patients fulfilled the criteria for eligibility. Median KPS was 80 (60–90). After a median follow-up of 5.8 months (IQR 3.7–13.1 months), median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (95?% CI 4.5–19.1) and the 1-year and 2-year OS were 39.5?% (95?% CI 21.9–71.2?%) and 6.6?% (95?% CI 1.0??43.3?%), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months (95?% CI 3.9–7.7 months), 1-year and 2-year PFS were 15.2?% (95?% CI 4.4–52.4) and 0?%, respectively. Overall, 16 (76.2?%) patients presented a recurrence. Overall seven patients (33.3?%) needed to be hospitalized during treatment. On univariate analysis, hospitalization was the only variable that correlated with less favourable outcome in terms of both OS (12.2 months versus 3.8 months, p?相似文献   

The efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide following concurrent radio-chemotherapy among Egyptian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

Although concurrent radio-chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) treatment for 6 cycles has been established as a standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, the recommended duration of adjuvant TMZ remains a matter of debate. Hereby, we aimed to report for the first time our experience from Upper Egypt through comparing survival and toxicity profile between two treatment modalities of adjuvant TMZ (> six cycles versus six cycles) and delineating factors of prognostic significance in Egyptian patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated by radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ. Between June 2016 and February 2018, the medical records of 121 patients were eligible to be retrospectively reviewed to extract the study relevant data. All patients received concurrent radio-chemotherapy, followed by TMZ for 6 cycles in 29 patients (Group 1) and for >6 cycles in 26 patients (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 had a median PFS of 15 months (95% CI: 10.215-19.785), while those in Group 2 had a median PFS of 18 months (95% CI: 16.611-19.389). After a median follow up duration of 20 months (range: 12-41), the median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 13.420-22.580) in Group 1 and 22 months (95% CI: 18.777-25.223) in Group 2. There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of chemotherapy cycles and PFS (P=0.513) or OS (P=0.867). The extent of surgical resection was the only independent prognostic factor for both PFS (P=0.015) and OS (P=0.028) by multivariate analysis. Three grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were encountered in 3 patients. One in the six-cycle group (neutropenia), and two in the extended cycles group (one had neutropenia and the other one developed thrombocytopenia). No statistically significant difference in the toxicity profile between both groups. The results of our study suggest that extended TMZ therapy is safe and tolerable, however it did not significantly improve PFS or OS as compared to the standard six-cycle course. Larger randomized studies are required to shed more light on this issue.