Predictors of sustained functional cure in hepatitis B envelope antigen‐negative patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance with interferon‐alpha–based therapy

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is considered a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the durability of HBsAg loss after stopping treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the sustained functional cure achieved by interferon therapy in hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐negative CHB patients. In this prospective study, 176 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with functional cure were enrolled for 12 weeks of cessation treatment, and treatment information and baseline data were collected. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) biomarkers and clinical biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months; liver imaging examinations were performed every 3‐6 months during the 48‐week follow‐up. The sustained functional cure was evaluated. After the 48‐week follow‐up, the sustained functional cure rate was 86.63%. The cumulative rates of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion were 12.79% and 2.33%, respectively. Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks after HBsAg loss achieved a significantly higher rate of sustained functional cure and significantly lower rate of HBsAg reversion than consolidation treatment < 12 weeks (76.19% vs 90.00%, P = 0.022 and 23.81% vs 9.23%, P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) had higher rate of sustained functional cure than patients achieving HBsAg loss but without HBsAb (89.86% vs 73.53%, P = 0.012). Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 16.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.135‐127.151; P = 0.007) and high HBsAb levels (OR 8.312; 95% CI, 1.824‐37.881; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sustained functional cure. Results suggested that 12 weeks of consolidation therapy after HBsAg clearance and elevated HBsAb levels help to improve functional cure.     

Roadmap to functional cure of chronic hepatitis B: An expert consensus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a major public health issue worldwide. HBsAg loss is associated with functional remission and improved long‐term outcome, and is considered to be a ‘functional cure’ (also referred to as clinical or immunologic cure) for chronic hepatitis B. This ideal goal of therapy can be achieved using optimized combination regimens with direct‐acting antivirals [eg nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)] and immunomodulators [eg pegylated interferon alpha2a (Peg‐IFN)] in selected patients with chronic hepatitis B. Among different combination therapies currently available, those with NA lead‐in followed by Peg‐IFN in virally suppressed patients has been demonstrated to be effective. This review provides an updated overview of the evidence supporting the use of combination therapies and summarizes expert consensus on the roadmap to attain functional cure for chronic hepatitis B patients.     

Pegylated interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Conventional interferon alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as lamivudine, are frequently used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but are associated with adverse effects and viral resistance. Here we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating all studies of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG‐IFNα) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. We searched electronic databases – PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and LILACS – for randomized controlled trials evaluating PEG‐IFNα therapy between 1999 and September 2014. Virological response was the primary outcome. We identified 14 studies involving 2829 patients. Our analysis revealed that PEG‐IFNα + lamivudine combination therapy produced better virological and biochemical responses than PEG‐IFNα monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients at the end of treatment. PEG‐IFNα + adefovir dipivoxil achieved better seroconversion rate than PEG‐IFNα in HBeAg‐positive patients at the end of treatment. The present findings demonstrated a beneficial response rate following PEG‐IFNα combination therapy with nucelos(t)ides among HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. Further trials are needed to investigate simultaneous and sequential therapy strategies.     

Therapeutic vaccination for chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Therapeutic vaccines may be promising treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their clinical efficacy and safety are unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of therapeutic vaccines in CHB patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar from 1990 until present and abstracts from EASL, APASL and AASLD from 2012 to 2017 and selected randomized controlled trials of CHB patients, comparing therapeutic vaccines with no treatment or standard of care. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool v2.0 and GRADE method were used. Analyses were stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status and the comparator (therapeutic vaccines vs no treatment, or therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care). Efficacy outcomes were HBeAg seroconversion, hepatitis B virus DNA reduction and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, measured at the end of treatment or end of follow‐up. Effects were reported as risk differences with 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model. Fifteen studies were included. A wide variety of therapeutic vaccines were tested. For HBeAg clearance at the end of follow‐up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = 0.01, 95% CI ?0.05 to 0.07, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care, RD = 0.03, 95% CI ?0.03 to 0.09. For HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow‐up, when comparing therapeutic vaccines vs no therapy, RD = ?0.03, 95% CI ?0.08 to 0.02, and when comparing therapeutic vaccines + standard of care, RD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02‐0.28. There were only a few studies on HBsAg loss, and hence, the findings were inconclusive. The only efficacy finding was HBVDNA reduction at the end of follow‐up for therapeutic vaccines + standard of care vs standard of care; otherwise, therapeutic vaccines do not appear to be efficacious for the treatment of CHB, but were limited by few RCTs, suboptimal therapeutic vaccines and patient selection.     

Relationship between polymorphisms near the IL28B gene and spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Polymorphisms near the interleukin (IL) 28B gene have been proposed to be associated with spontaneous clearance of the hepatitis C virus. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between IL28B polymorphisms and the rate of spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance by means of meta‐analysis. MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were utilized to identify relevant studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were analysed together to assess the strength of the association. Subgroup analyses were mainly performed according to ethnicity. A total of 4028 cases with persistent chronic hepatitis B and 2327 spontaneously recovered controls were included from 11 studies. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs12979860, had no significant association with HBsAg seroclearance (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84–1.14 in the dominant model; OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.68–1.46 in the recessive model; and OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82–1.09 in the allelic model). The SNP, rs12980275, had no significant association either (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84–1.26 in the dominant model; OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.46–2.96 in the recessive model; and OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.86–1.26 in the allelic model), nor did the SNP, rs8099917 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.77–1.15 in the dominant model; OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.34–1.62 in the recessive model; and OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77–1.13 in the allelic model). Similarly, the results of subgroup analyses by ethnicity also showed no association in either the Asian group or non‐Asian group. We concluded that there was no significant association between common IL28B polymorphisms and the rate of spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance.     

HBsAg loss after peginterferon‐nucleotide combination treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: 5 years of follow‐up

Combining peginterferon‐alfa‐2a (pegIFN) with a nucleotide analogue can result in higher rates of HBsAg loss than either therapy given alone. Here, we investigated the durability of the response to combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after 5 years of follow‐up. In the initial study, 92 CHB patients (44 HBeAg‐positive, 48 HBeAg‐negative) with HBV DNA >100 000 c/mL (~20 000 IU/mL) and active hepatitis were treated for 48 weeks with pegIFN 180 μg/week and 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil daily. For the long‐term follow‐up (LTFU) study, patients were followed up for 5 years after the end of treatment. At year 5, 70 (32 HBeAg‐positive, 38 HBeAg‐negative) patients remained in the study. At year 5, 19% (6/32) of HBeAg‐positive patients and 16% (6/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients lost HBsAg, and no HBsAg seroreversion was observed. The 5‐year cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for HBsAg loss was 17.2% for HBeAg‐positive patients and 19.3% for HBeAg‐negative patients. Fourteen of sixteen patients who lost HBsAg at any time point during follow‐up developed anti‐HBs antibodies (>10 IU/L). At year 5, in total 63% (20/32) of HBeAg‐positive and 71% (27/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients were retreated with nucleos(t)ide analogues during follow‐up. The cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for retreatment was 60% of patients at year 5. At year 5 of follow‐up, 18% of CHB patients treated with pegIFN/nucleotide analogue combination therapy had durable HBsAg loss and 88% of these had developed anti‐HBs antibodies.     

The role of peginterferon in nucleos(t)ide‐analogue‐treated chronic hepatitis B patients: A review of published literature

Chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) causes up to 1.0 million deaths annually. Currently, more than 90% of CHB patients worldwide are receiving indefinite nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy. New strategies for optimizing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss are required for NA‐treated patients as the majority are unable to achieve HBsAg loss and may require lifelong therapy. In hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive patients, switching from NAs to finite peginterferon (PegIFN) therapy can double HBeAg seroconversion rates. One in five patients who switch to PegIFN can achieve HBsAg loss, whereas patients who continue NA therapy typically do not. In HBeAg‐negative NA‐treated patients, add‐on PegIFN therapy achieves higher, albeit modest, HBsAg loss rates compared with continued NA monotherapy and offers the opportunity for NA‐treated patients to achieve the inactive carrier state. In the absence of curative therapies, PegIFN represents a valuable, finite option for NA‐treated patients who would otherwise require potentially lifelong therapy.     

The effectiveness of nucleoside analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients unresponsive to interferon therapy: our clinical trials for one year

Background and Aims

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nucleoside analogues such as Lamivudine, Adefovir,Entacavir, and Tenofovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B who failed to respond to interferon therapy and relapsed.

Materials and Methods

We followed a total of 73 patients with hepatitis B in the hepatitis outpatient clinic in our hospital. The patients subsequently received nucleoside analogues therapy and their treatment data were evaluated retrospectively. The biochemical and virological response rates were evaluated at 3 and 12 months, and we compared these results with the results of treatment-naive patients.

Results

There were 29 (39.7%) HbeAg-positive and 44 (60.3%) HbeAg-negative patients, and their mean age was 35.8 (±13.4) years. Of these patients, 33, 18, 13 and 9 received Entacavir, Tenofovir, Lamivudine, and Adefovir treatment,respectively. In HbeAg-negative patients, at 3 months the biochemical and virological response (early response) rates were observed to be 91% and 98%), and at 12 months the two rates were 93% and 73%, respectively. In HbeAg-positive patients, the biochemical and virological response rates at 3 months were 83% and 97%, and the rates at 12 months were 90% and 48%, respectively.

Conclusions

In CHB therapy with treatment-resistent patients, nucleoside analogues may be preferable. There are disadvantages to nucleoside analogues, such as a risk of developing resistance during therapy, reduced HBeAg seroconversion compared to interferons, and the therapy’s ambiguous duration. In our study, in HbeAg-negative patients who received nucleoside analogues, a lower biochemical response rate was detected in patients with 1 year of Lamivudine therapy compared to other therapies. For HbeAg-positive patients, the virological response rate was higher in 1 year of Tenofovir therapy than with other therapies.     

Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND METHODS: Alpha interferon is the generally approved therapy for HBe antigen positive patients with chronic hepatitis B, but its efficacy is limited. Lamivudine is a new oral nucleoside analogue which potently inhibits hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA replication. To investigate the possibility of an additive effect of interferon-lamivudine combination therapy compared with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy, we conducted a randomised controlled trial in 230 predominantly Caucasian patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA positive chronic hepatitis B. Previously untreated patients were randomised to receive: combination therapy of lamivudine 100 mg daily with alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks after pretreatment with lamivudine for eight weeks (n=75); alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks (n=69); or lamivudine 100 mg daily for 52 weeks (n=82). The primary efficacy end point was the HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 (loss of HBeAg, development of antibodies to HBeAg and undetectable HBV DNA). RESULTS: The HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 was 29% for the combination therapy, 19% for interferon monotherapy, and 18% for lamivudine monotherapy (p=0.12 and p=0.10, respectively, for comparison of the combination therapy with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy). The HBeAg seroconversion rates at week 52 for the combination therapy and lamivudine monotherapy were significantly different in the per protocol analysis (36% (20/56) v 19% (13/70), respectively; p=0.02). The effect of combining lamivudine and interferon appeared to be most useful in patients with moderately elevated alanine aminotransferase levels at baseline. Adverse events with the combination therapy were similar to interferon monotherapy; patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had significantly fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: HBeAg seroconversion rates at one year were similar for lamivudine monotherapy (52 weeks) and standard alpha interferon therapy (16 weeks). The combination of lamivudine and interferon appeared to increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate, particularly in patients with moderately elevated baseline aminotransferase levels. The potential benefit of combining lamivudine and interferon should be investigated further in studies with different regimens of combination therapy.     

Interferon treatment with or without oral ganciclovir in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a randomized study

The treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with alpha interferon alone is unsatisfactory. We evaluated the efficacy of combined administration of interferon-a2a (IFN) with oral ganciclovir, a nucleoside analogue. Forty patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA-positive/HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, were randomized to receive 4.5 MU IFN thrice weekly, subcutaneously, alone or in combination with 3 g ganciclovir per os daily for 26 weeks and followed for 12 months after treatment. Mean serum HBV-DNA levels decreased by 4.0 log10 in the combination group (from 5 x 106 to 4.8 x 102 copies/ml) and by 2.2 log10 in the interferon group (from 8 x 106 to 4.8 x 104 copies/ml) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HBV-DNA became undetectable in 11 of 20 (55%) and in three of 20 (15%) patients in the two groups, respectively (P=0.02). The alanine aminotransferase levels became normal in all patients receiving combination therapy, compared to 75% of those in the interferon group. After cessation of therapy, HBV-DNA increased or reappeared in all patients with 85% also relapsing biochemically. One year after treatment, three patients in each group (15%) remained in sustained biochemical remission with very low serum HBV-DNA levels (median 15 700 copies/ml). We conclude that, in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B, 6-month combination therapy with oral ganciclovir and IFN is associated with complete biochemical remission in all treated patients and a 4 log10 decrease in serum HBV-DNA levels. The end of treatment efficacy of this combination scheme is far super- ior to that of IFN monotherapy but sustained responses are few. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged combination schemes with nucleoside analogues and IFN, compared to IFN monotherapy.     

联合核苷类药物治疗干扰素应答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎时机选择及疗效研究

目的：探讨干扰素治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎时,联合核苷（酸）类药物的不同时机对治疗应答的影响。方法：观察干扰素治疗患者分别在治疗起始时联合阿德福韦酯、12周应答不佳者及24周应答不佳者联合拉米夫定最终各组疗效。结果：48周时及停药后24周时,起始时联合阿德福韦酯治疗组及12周应答不佳者联合拉米夫定组患者的病毒转阴率、 ALT复常率、 HBeAg转阴率均高于对照组（ P＜0.05）,而HBeAg转换率并未有明显提高（ P＞0.05）。结论：治疗起始干扰素联合阿德福韦酯或根据12周应答情况加用拉米夫定治疗均能一定程度提高治疗应答率。     

Immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co‐infection can add to the severity of hepatitis and the risks of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Whether chronic HCV infection decreases antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination is still controversial. We evaluate the influence of HCV infection on antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination by a systematic review of published works with a meta‐analysis of clinical trials. The random‐effects model of DerSimonian and Laird with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were used in this study. The end‐point of interest was the rate of patients showing seroconversion of antibody responses at completion of hepatitis B vaccination schedule among patients with chronic HCV infection versus healthy controls. We identified 11 studies involving 704 patients with HCV and 812 controls. Our results show a significant decrease in antibody seroconversion rates among patients with HCV versus healthy controls (pooled odds ratio = 0.17 [95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.28]). The P‐value was 0.21 for our test of study heterogeneity. Stratified analysis in subgroups of interest and sensitivity analysis did not meaningfully change our results. Our meta‐analysis showed patients with hepatitis C infection have a statistically significant lower rate of seroconversion in comparison to healthy controls, both in cirrhotic and non‐cirrhotic patients. Chronic HCV infection can decrease the immune response to a standard schedule of hepatitis B vaccination. Further studies are needed to investigate the optimum vaccination schedule for patients with chronic HCV infection.