Belatacept‐based immunosuppression with simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and early corticosteroid withdrawal: A prospective,randomized multicenter trial

Simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance (CNIA) and early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) have not been achieved primarily due to excessive acute rejection. This trial compared 2 belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens with a tacrolimus‐based ESW regimen. Kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive alemtuzumab/belatacept, rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG)/belatacept, or rATG/tacrolimus. The combinatorial primary endpoint consisted of patient death, renal allograft loss, or a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease–calculated eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m² at 12 months. Results are reported by treatment group (alemtuzumab/belatacept, rATG/belatacept, and rATG/tacrolimus). Superiority was not observed at 1 year for the primary endpoint (9/107 [8.4%], 15/104 [14.4%], and 14/105 [13.3%], respectively; P = NS) for either belatacept‐based regimen. Differences were not observed for secondary endpoints (death, death‐censored graft loss, or estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²). Differences were observed in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection (10.3%, 18.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) (P < .001), but not in antibody‐mediated rejection, mixed acute rejection, or de novo donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies. Neurologic and electrolyte abnormality adverse events were less frequent under belatacept. Belatacept‐based CNIA/ESW regimens did not prove to be superior for the primary or secondary endpoints. Belatacept‐treated patients demonstrated an increase in biopsy‐proved acute cellular rejection and reduced neurologic and metabolic adverse events. These results demonstrate that simultaneous CNIA/ESW is feasible without excessive acute rejection.     

Evaluation of C1q Status and Titer of De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibodies as Predictors of Allograft Survival

De novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs) that develop after renal transplantation are independent predictors of allograft loss. However, it is unknown if dnDSA C1q status or titer at the time of first detection can independently predict allograft loss. In a consecutive cohort of 508 renal transplant recipients, 70 developed dnDSAs. Histologic and clinical outcomes were correlated with the C1q assay or dnDSA titer. C1q positivity correlated with dnDSA titer (p < 0.01) and mean fluorescence intensity (p < 0.01) and was more common in class II versus class I dnDSAs (p < 0.01). C1q status correlated with tubulitis (p = 0.02) and C4d status (p = 0.03) in biopsies at the time of dnDSA development, but not T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) or antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). De novo DSA titer correlated with Banff g, i, t, ptc, C4d scores, TCMR (p < 0.01) and ABMR (p < 0.01). Post‐dnDSA graft loss was observed more frequently in recipients with C1q‐positve dnDSA (p < 0.01) or dnDSA titer ≥ 1:1024 (p ≤ 0.01). However, after adjustment for clinical phenotype and nonadherence in multivariate models, neither C1q status nor dnDSA titer were independently associated with allograft loss, questioning the utility of these assays at the time of dnDSA development.     

ASP2409, A Next‐Generation CTLA4‐Ig,Versus Belatacept in Renal Allograft Survival in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent approved for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Clinical results have indicated that belatacept is associated with superior renal function and improved metabolic profile; however, higher incidence of acute rejection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are the shortcomings of this agent. In this study, ASP2409, a new cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte associated protein 4‐immunoglobulin possessing 14‐fold higher in vitro CD86 binding affinity than belatacept, was tested for renal allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys. ASP2409 monotherapy dose‐dependently prolonged renal allograft survival. Low‐dose ASP2409 in combination with a subtherapeutic dose of tacrolimus showed much longer median survival time than monotherapy. Similar allograft survival results were observed in regimens based on high‐dose ASP2409, belatacept, and therapeutic‐dose tacrolimus. The results of renal allograft histopathology with high‐dose ASP2409‐based regimens were not inferior to the belatacept‐based regimen. Moreover, higher frequencies of FoxP3‐positive regulatory T cells in renal allografts were observed in ASP2409‐ and belatacept‐based regimens compared with tacrolimus‐based regimens. No serious side effects related to ASP2409 administration were found during the study. These data suggest that ASP2409 is a promising candidate for calcineurin inhibitor‐sparing or ‐avoidance regimens.     

Rates and Determinants of Progression to Graft Failure in Kidney Allograft Recipients With De Novo Donor‐Specific Antibody

Understanding rates and determinants of clinical pathologic progression for recipients with de novo donor‐specific antibody (dnDSA), especially subclinical dnDSA, may identify surrogate endpoints and inform clinical trial design. A consecutive cohort of 508 renal transplant recipients (n = 64 with dnDSA) was studied. Recipients (n = 388) without dnDSA or dysfunction had an eGFR decline of ?0.65 mL/min/1.73 m²/year. In recipients with dnDSA, the rate eGFR decline was significantly increased prior to dnDSA onset (?2.89 vs. ?0.65 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, p < 0.0001) and accelerated post‐dnDSA (?3.63 vs. ?2.89 mL/min/1.73 m²/year, p < 0.0001), suggesting that dnDSA is both a marker and contributor to ongoing alloimmunity. Time to 50% post‐dnDSA graft loss was longer in recipients with subclinical versus a clinical dnDSA phenotype (8.3 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.0001). Analysis of 1091 allograft biopsies found that dnDSA and time independently predicted chronic glomerulopathy (cg), but not interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Early T cell–mediated rejection, nonadherence, and time were multivariate predictors of IFTA. Independent risk factors for post‐dnDSA graft survival available prior to, or at the time of, dnDSA detection were delayed graft function, nonadherence, dnDSA mean fluorescence intensity sum score, tubulitis, and cg. Ultimately, dnDSA is part of a continuum of mixed alloimmune‐mediated injury, which requires solutions targeting T and B cells.

     

Early post‐transplant conversion from tacrolimus to belatacept for prolonged delayed graft function improves renal function in kidney transplant recipients

Prolonged delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients imparts a risk of poor allograft function; tacrolimus may be detrimental in this setting. We conducted a retrospective single center analysis of the first 20 patients converted to belatacept for prolonged DGF as part of a clinical protocol as a novel treatment strategy to treat prolonged DGF. Prior to conversion, patients underwent an allograft biopsy to rule out rejection and confirm tubular injury. The primary outcome was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months post‐transplant; secondary outcome was the change in eGFR 30 days post‐belatacept conversion. At 1 year post‐transplant, the mean eGFR was 54.2 (SD 19.2) mL/min/1.73 m². The mean eGFR on the day of belatacept conversion was 16 (SD 12.7) mL/min/1.73 m² and rose to 43.1 (SD 15.8) mL/min/1.73 m² 30 days post‐conversion (P<.0001). The acute rejection rate was 20% with 100% patient survival at 12 months post‐transplant. There was one graft loss in the setting of an invasive Aspergillus infection that resulted in withdrawal of immunosuppression and transplant nephrectomy. Belatacept conversion for prolonged DGF is a novel treatment strategy that resulted in an improvement in eGFR. Additional follow‐up is warranted to confirm the long‐term benefits of this strategy.     

Belatacept in renal transplant recipient with mild immunologic risk factor: A pilot prospective study (BELACOR)

The benefit of belatacept on antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) incidence after kidney transplant with preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) has never been assessed. Between 2014 and 2016, we conducted a multicenter prospective clinical trial with 49 patients to determine kidney allograft outcome in recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000) treated with belatacept (BELACOR trial). Immunosuppressive strategy included antithymocyte globulin, belatacept, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. An ancillary control group was designed retrospectively, including patients fulfilling the same inclusion criteria treated with calcineurin inhibitors. In BELACOR group, no patient exhibited acute ABMR, patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 100% and 95.4%, respectively, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 53.2 mL/min/1.73 m². However, the 12‐month incidence of acute T cell–mediated rejection was 25.4% (14.5% to 42.4%). Comparison with the control group showed significantly higher T cell–mediated rejection incidence only in the BELACOR group (P = .003). Considering the DSAs, the outcome was similar in the 2 groups except a significantly higher number of patients displayed a complete disappearance of class II DSAs in the BELACOR group (P = .001). Belatacept was not associated with an acute ABMR increased risk and may be considered as immunosuppressive strategy in transplant recipients with preformed DSAs (maximal mean fluorescence intensity 500 to 3000). Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Conversion to belatacept within 1-year of renal transplantation in a diverse cohort including patients with donor-specific antibodies

Early conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to belatacept has the potential to improve long-term renal allograft function; however, there remains limited experience with this strategy among African Americans and patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA). To examine these subgroups, we performed a single-center review of kidney transplant recipients converted to belatacept within 1-year of transplant between 01/2011 and 10/2017. All patients received lymphocyte-depleting induction with maintenance tacrolimus and mycophenolate +/− corticosteroids. Patients were switched to belatacept for clinical indication and followed from date of conversion until allograft failure or study conclusion. The primary endpoint at 1-year was a composite of allograft loss, biopsy proven rejection, de novo DSA formation, proteinuria, and declining renal function. Thirty-two patients were included in the review. The majority were African American, and 28.1% had DSA at transplant. Patient and allograft survival at 1-year was 96.9% and 93.8%, respectively, and estimated glomerular filtration rate improved from 41.9 to 58.4 mL/min. No African Americans or patients with pretreatment DSA developed rejection or allograft failure within 1-year. The only clinical variable correlated with suboptimal allograft function was baseline weight ≥80 kg (OR = 6.2; 95% CI, 1.2-32.3). Early conversion to belatacept appears safe for select patients with DSA and African Americans receiving lymphocyte-depleting induction.     

Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Islet Allograft Survival: Adverse Consequences of Concomitant Alefacept Therapy

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids are known to promote insulin resistance, and their avoidance after islet transplantation is preferred from a metabolic standpoint. Belatacept, a B7‐specific mediator of costimulation blockade (CoB), is clinically indicated as a CNI alternative in renal transplantation, and we have endeavored to develop a clinically translatable, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Based on the known synergy between CoB and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched islet allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on CoB‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Nine rhesus macaques were rendered diabetic with streptozotocin and underwent islet allotransplantation. All received belatacept and sirolimus; six also received alefacept. Belatacept and sirolimus significantly prolonged rejection‐free graft survival (median 225 days compared to 8 days in controls receiving basiliximab and sirolimus; p = 0.022). The addition of alefacept provided no additional survival benefit, but was associated with Cytomegalovirus reactivation in four of six animals. No recipients produced donor‐specific alloantibodies. The combination of belatacept and sirolimus successfully prevents islet allograft survival in rhesus monkeys, but induction with alefacept provides no survival benefit and increases the risk of viral reactivation.     

Phase I study of single‐dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of belatacept in adolescent kidney transplant recipients

Belatacept is an intravenously infused selective T cell costimulation blocker approved for preventing organ rejection in renal transplant recipients aged ≥18 years. This phase I trial examined the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (percentage CD86 receptor occupancy [%CD86RO]) of a single dose of belatacept (7.5 mg/kg) administered to kidney transplant recipients aged 12‐17 years receiving a stable calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppressive regimen. Nine adolescents (mean age 15.1 years) who were seropositive for Epstein‐Barr virus were enrolled; all completed the 6‐month study. Pharmacokinetics suggested relatively low variability of exposure (coefficients of variation for maximum observed serum concentration [C_max] and area under the serum concentration‐time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity [AUC_0‐INF] were 20% and 25%, respectively). Mean half‐life (T_1/2) occurred 7.2 days postinfusion. Belatacept total body clearance was 0.48 mL/h/kg, and volume of distribution at steady‐state (V_ss) was low at 0.09 L/kg. Compared with historical data from healthy adult volunteers administered a single dose of belatacept 10 mg/kg and adult kidney transplant recipients administered multiple doses of belatacept 5 mg/kg, pharmacokinetic values for adolescents were similar, indicating consistency across adolescent and adult populations. Mean %CD86RO increased with increasing belatacept concentration, indicating a direct relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Four patients reported 7 serious adverse events; none was considered related to belatacept. These data will inform belatacept dose selection in future studies of adolescent kidney transplant recipients.     

Belatacept for renal rescue in lung transplant patients

Renal failure causes morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation and is aggravated by exposure to nephrotoxic immunosuppressant (IS) drugs. We report an off‐label experience using belatacept for lung transplant recipients with severe renal insufficiency to reduce nephrotoxic IS exposure. We analyzed data retrospectively from a consecutive series of lung transplant patients with renal insufficiency in whom belatacept treatment was initiated between June 2012 and June 2014 at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Eight patients received belatacept because of acute or chronic renal insufficiency (median) GFR 24 (IQR 18–26). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remained stable in two patients and increased in five. One patient with established renal and respiratory failure received only the induction dose of belatacept and died 4 months later of respiratory and multisystem organ failure. Calcineurin inhibitor or sirolimus exposure was safely withheld or reduced without moderate or severe acute rejection during ongoing belatacept in the other seven patients. FEV₁ remained stable over the 6‐month study interval. Belatacept use appears to permit safe transient reduction in conventional immunosuppressive therapy and was associated with stable or improved renal function in a small retrospective series of lung transplant recipients with acute or chronic renal insufficiency.     

Belatacept Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Vascular Lesions: A Case Control Study

Immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with decreased graft function and severe histological vascular changes can be particularly challenging. Belatacept could be a valuable option, as a rescue therapy in this context. We report a retrospective case control study comparing a CNI to belatacept switch in 17 patients with vascular damage and low eGFR to a control group of 18 matched patients with CNI continuation. Belatacept switch was performed on average 51.5 months after kidney transplantation (6.2–198 months). There was no difference between the two groups regarding eGFR at inclusion, and 3 months before inclusion. In the “CNI to belatacept switch group,” mean eGFR increased significantly from 23.5 ± 6.7 mL/min/1.73m² on day 0, to 30.4 ± 9.1 mL/min/1.73 m² on month 6 (p < 0.001) compared to the control group, in which no improvement was observed. These results were still significant on month 12. Two patients experienced biopsy‐proven acute rejection. One was effectively treated without belatacept discontinuation. Two patients needed belatacept discontinuation for infection. In conclusion, the remplacement of CNI with belatacept in patients with decreased allograft function and vascular lesions is associated with an improvement in eGFR.     

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m² prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.03) at a mean follow‐up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.     

Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Renal Allograft Survival Without a Requirement for Memory T Cell Depletion

Belatacept is an inhibitor of CD28/B7 costimulation that is clinically indicated as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids after renal transplantation. We sought to develop a clinically translatable, nonlymphocyte depleting, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Thus, based on murine data showing synergy between costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched renal allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Belatacept and sirolimus therapy successfully prevented rejection in all animals. Tolerance was not induced, as animals rejected after withdrawal of therapy. The regimen did not deplete T cells. Alefecept did not add a survival benefit to the optimized belatacept and sirolimus regimen, despite causing an intended depletion of memory T cells, and caused a marked reduction in regulatory T cells. Furthermore, alefacept‐treated animals had a significantly increased incidence of CMV reactivation, suggesting that this combination overly compromised protective immunity. These data support belatacept and sirolimus as a clinically translatable, nondepleting, CNI‐free, steroid‐sparing immunomodulatory regimen that promotes sustained rejection‐free allograft survival after renal transplantation.     

Belatacept‐based immunosuppression: A calcineurin inhibitor‐sparing regimen in heart transplant recipients

Belatacept (BTC) is indicated for prophylaxis of graft rejection in adults receiving a renal transplant (Tx). This retrospective observational study (three centers) included all heart transplant recipients receiving BTC between January 2014 and October 2018. Forty EBV+ patients mean GFR 35 ± 20 mL/min/m² were identified, among whom belatacept was initiated during the first 3 months after transplantation in 12 patients, and later in 28 patients. Several patients were multiorgan transplant recipients. Study outcomes were GFR, safety, and changes in immunosuppressive therapy. The main reason for switching to BTC was to preserve renal function, resulting in discontinuation of CNI and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in 76% of cases. At study closeout, 24/40 patients were still on BTC therapy. GFR was improved (+59%, P = .0002*) within 1 month, particularly in the early group. More episodes of rejection were observed among “late” patients (1 death). Sixteen treatment discontinuations were recorded: GFR recovery (n = 4), DSA no longer detectable (n = 1), compliance issues (n = 3), poor venous access (n = 2), multiple infections (n = 1), 1 death (fungal lung infection), and treatment failure (n = 4). Median follow‐up was 24 months. Four patients developed de novo DSA (MFI<1500). BTC is an effective alternative immunosuppressive for postoperative transient kidney failure, stabilizing delayed renal function, with acceptable safety profile under careful monitoring.     

Abatacept as rescue immunosuppression after calcineurin inhibitor treatment failure in renal transplantation

A majority of kidney transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression. However, some do not tolerate calcineurin inhibitors and require other immunosuppressive strategies. Until recently, alternative approaches have been associated with inferior outcomes, but recent methods have effectively utilized belatacept in calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant patients. Though promising, belatacept uptake has been limited by higher acute rejection rates, unavailability due to production shortages, and logistical challenges as a result of intravenous infusion requirements. Interestingly, its predecessor abatacept is clinically available in subcutaneous formulation to treat autoimmune disorders but has not been used in clinical transplantation. Here we report on a series of 9 calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant transplant recipients converted to abatacept early after transplant as rescue immunosuppression during periods of belatacept unavailability. Retrospective review revealed successful allograft salvage and 100% patient and graft survival (median 115 months) after conversion to abatacept. Patients received abatacept for a median duration of 82 months with stable, long‐term renal allograft function, a single cellular rejection episode, and no clinically apparent protective immunity concerns. Hence our findings suggest that future clinical studies utilizing abatacept either de novo or as conversion therapy in transplant recipients should be considered.     

Alemtuzumab induction and belatacept maintenance in marginal pathology renal allografts

We performed a prospective, 12‐month, single‐center, nonrandomized, open‐label pilot study to investigate the use of belatacept therapy combined with alemtuzumab induction in renal allografts with preexisting pathology, as these kidneys may be more susceptible to additional toxicity when exposed to calcineurin inhibitors posttransplant. Nineteen belatacept recipients were matched retrospectively to a cohort of tacrolimus recipients on the basis of preimplantation pathology. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different between belatacept and tacrolimus recipients at either 3 or 12 months posttransplant (59 vs 45, P = 0.1 and 56 vs 48 mL/min/1.72/m², P = 0.3). Biopsy‐proven acute rejection rates at 12 months were 26% in belatacept recipients and 16% in tacrolimus recipients (P = 0.7). Graft survival at 1 year was 89% in both groups. Alemtuzumab induction combined with either calcineurin inhibitor or costimulatory blockade therapies resulted in similar acceptable one‐year outcomes in kidneys with preexisting pathologic changes. Longer‐term follow‐up may be necessary to identify preferential strategies to improve outcomes of kidneys at a higher risk for poor function (ClinicalTrials.gov—NCT01496417).     

Allograft outcome following repeat transplantation of patients with non‐adherence‐related first kidney allograft failure: a population cohort study

Nonadherence is an important risk factor for premature allograft failure after kidney transplantation, but outcomes after re‐transplantation remain uncertain. Using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry, the associations between causes of first allograft failure and acute rejection‐related and non‐adherence‐related allograft failure following re‐transplantation were examined using competing risk analyses, treating the respective alternative causes of allograft failure and death with functioning graft as competing events. Fifty‐nine of 2450 patients (2%) lost their first allografts from nonadherence. Patients who lost their first kidney allograft from nonadherence were younger at the time of first kidney allograft failure but waited longer for a second allograft (>5 years: 54% vs. 20%, P < 0.001) compared with other causes. Compared with patients who lost their first allograft from causes other than nonadherence, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (HR and 95% CI) for acute rejection‐related second allograft failure was 0.58 (0.08, 4.07; P = 0.582) for patients with allograft failure attributed to nonadherence and was 6.30 (1.34, 29.67; P = 0.020) for non‐adherence‐related second allograft failure. In this cohort of transplant recipients who have received second allografts, first allograft failure secondary to nonadherence was associated with a marginally greater risk of allograft failure attributed to nonadherence in subsequent transplantation.     

Belatacept Combined With Transient Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy Prevents Rejection and Promotes Improved Long‐Term Renal Allograft Function

Belatacept, a T cell costimulation blocker, demonstrated superior renal function, lower cardiovascular risk, and improved graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients. Despite the potential benefits, adoption of belatacept has been limited in part due to concerns regarding higher rates and grades of acute rejection in clinical trials. Since July 2011, we have utilized belatacept‐based immunosuppression regimens in clinical practice. In this retrospective analysis of 745 patients undergoing renal transplantation at our center, we compared patients treated with belatacept (n = 535) with a historical cohort receiving a tacrolimus‐based protocol (n = 205). Patient and graft survival were equivalent for all groups. An increased rate of acute rejection was observed in an initial cohort treated with a protocol similar to the low‐intensity regimen from the BENEFIT trial versus the historical tacrolimus group (50.5% vs. 20.5%). The addition of a transient course of tacrolimus reduced rejection rates to acceptable levels (16%). Treatment with belatacept was associated with superior estimated GFR (belatacept 63.8 mL/min vs. tacrolimus 46.2 mL/min at 4 years, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in serious infections including rates of cytomegalovirus or BK viremia. We describe the development of a costimulatory blockade‐based strategy that ultimately allows renal transplant recipients to achieve calcineurin inhibitor–free immunosuppression.     

Belatacept treatment for two yr after liver transplantation is not associated with operational tolerance

Belatacept was recently evaluated in liver transplantation (LT) in a phase II multicenter trial, which was terminated prematurely. Patients were more than two yr post‐LT at the time. As high rates of spontaneous tolerance after LT have been reported and as belatacept has marked immunomodulatory effects, we decided to maintain the belatacept patients enrolled at our center (n = 4) on MMF monotherapy. All belatacept patients on MMF monotherapy developed graft dysfunction consistent with acute rejection after a mean period of 10.3 (7–14) wk. Patients were therefore switched to triple therapy with CNI, MMF, and corticosteroids. Graft dysfunction resolved within 1–3 wk after switch. At the time of belatacept discontinuation, mean eGFR was 105.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (92.1–118.9) in belatacept patients compared to 58 mL/min/1.73 m² (36.1–98.2) in controls (p = 0.022). One yr after the switch to CNI therapy, eGFR had declined by 27.4 mL (19.2–39.3; p = 0.008). Thus, LT patients treated with belatacept show superior kidney function that declines upon institution of CNIs. MMF monotherapy following withdrawal of belatacept is associated with a high incidence of graft dysfunction. Belatacept has no obvious immunomodulatory effects in LT recipients that would be sufficient to allow drug withdrawal with a high rate of success.     

Conversion to belatacept maintenance immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

There are only scattered case reports documenting belatacept use in HIV + kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review to describe short-term outcomes following conversion to belatacept in a cohort of HIV + patients. Patients were included if they were converted to belatacept between May 2015 and May 2019, had an HIV- donor, and received ≥4 doses of belatacept. All patients were treated with non-depleting induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Allograft and HIV-related outcomes were collected from the date of belatacept infusion until May 2020. Ten HIV + kidney transplant recipients were identified, who were converted to belatacept a median of 364 days post-transplant. At last follow-up (median 3.3 years), 8 patients remained on belatacept therapy, and all patients were alive with functioning allografts. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) improved from 31.6 mL/min at baseline to 42.8 mL/min at 1 year (P = .03). Two patients developed acute rejection, with one necessitating conversion back to tacrolimus. All patients maintained undetectable HIV-1 viral loads at last follow-up. One patient each developed pneumocystis pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma following conversion, which were responsive to standard medical therapy. In our cohort of stable HIV + kidney transplant recipients, conversion to belatacept was associated with excellent early patient and allograft survival and improved eGFR at 1 year.