Is Surgical Workforce Diversity Increasing?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the extent to which recent increases in levels of gender and racial diversity in the overall resident-physician workforce were evident among core-surgical specialty resident workforces. STUDY DESIGN: Chi-square tests for trend assessed the importance of changes from 1996 to 2004 in proportions of women and African Americans in the surgery-resident workforce. Surgery-resident trends were compared with overall resident workforce trends using two-tailed t-tests to compare regression slopes that quantified rates of change over time. Chi-square tests assessed differences between proportions of women and African Americans in the current overall board-certified workforce and their proportions in the surgery board-certified workforce. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2004, proportions of women increased in all seven surgical specialties studied. Compared with the overall trend toward increasing proportions of women in the resident workforce, the trend in one surgical specialty was larger (obstetrics/gynecology, p < 0.01), four were similar (each p > 0.05), and two were smaller (each p < 0.001). Proportions of African Americans increased in four specialties. Compared with the overall trend, trends in two specialties were larger (obstetrics/gynecology and neurologic surgery, each p < 0.01) and two were similar (each p > 0.05). Proportions of African Americans decreased in three specialties (each p < 0.01). Proportions of women and African Americans in every board-certified specialty workforce, except obstetrics/gynecology, remained lower than in the overall board-certified workforce (each p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many demographic disparities between the surgery-resident and overall-resident workforces have persisted since 1996 and will likely perpetuate ongoing surgery board-certified workforce disparities.     

Disparities in utilization of laparoscopic colectomies in pediatric Crohn's disease✰

PurposePediatric patients with Crohn's disease often require colectomies. The laparoscopic approach is considered safe, but there is little national data on outcomes and readmissions in this population.MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2014 for patients ≤ 18 years who underwent colectomy for Crohn's disease during index admission. Patients were stratified by operative approach: laparoscopic versus open. Outcomes were compared with standard statistical methods.ResultsThere were 2833 patients (47% female) who underwent a colectomy via laparoscopic (58%) vs. open (42%) approach. Index admissions were elective 55% of the time. Most operations were right hemicolectomy (86%), followed by total colectomy (8%). Of the study population, 489 (17%) were diverted with an ostomy. Readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year were 9% and 18%, respectively. The most common diagnoses at readmission were intra-abdominal infection (16%), small bowel obstruction (16%), and surgical site infection (9%).Laparoscopy was more commonly performed during elective admissions (63% vs. 44%), for patient with private insurance (72% vs. 39%), and for patients in the highest income quartile (66% vs. 48% in the lowest income quartile), all p<0.001. Length of stay was longer on index admission for open colectomy (8[5–12] days vs. 6[4–11] days, p<0.001), while cost was similar ($17,754[$12,375-$30,625] vs. $17,017[$11,219-$27,336], p = 0.104). There were no differences in readmission rate, intraabdominal infection or small bowel obstruction.ConclusionIn pediatric patients, laparoscopic colectomy for Crohn's disease is safe and is associated with shorter hospitalization and equivalent hospital costs compared to the open procedure. Socioeconomic disparities in laparoscopic utilization exist and warrant future investigation.Level of Evidence: Level III     

Systematic Review of Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score—Preoperative Risk Stratification in Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery is the best long term treatment for morbid obesity. However, it carries risks of considerable morbidity and potential mortality. There is no published review on pre-operative identification of high-risk patients in bariatric surgery. This systematic review analyses obesity surgery mortality risk score (OS-MRS) as a tool for pre-operative prediction of mortality risk in bariatric surgery. Medline and Embase was systematically searched using the medical subjects headings (MeSH) terms 'bariatric surgery' and 'mortality' with further free text search and cross references. Studies that described OS-MRS to predict mortality risk after bariatric surgery were included in this review. Six studies evaluated 9,382 patients to assess the validity of OS-MRS to predict the mortality risk after bariatric surgery. Patient's age ranged from 19 to 67 years, and the body mass index ranged from 30 to 84. There were 83 deaths among the 9,382 patients (0.88 %) with individual studies reporting a mortality range from 0 % to 1.49 %. There were 13 deaths among 4,912 (0.26 %) class A patients, 55 deaths among 4,124 (1.33 %) class B patients and 15 deaths among 346 (4.34 %) class C patients. Mortality in classes A, B and C was significantly different from each of the other two classes (P < 0.05, χ(2)). This systematic review confirms that OS-MRS stratifies the mortality risk in the three-risk classification subgroups of patients. The OS-MRS can be used for pre-operative identification of high-risk patients undergoing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.     

Evidence of Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Bariatric Surgery—Results of a Quality Assurance Trial in Bariatric Surgery in Germany from 2005 to 2007 and Review of the Literature

Background  Since January 1st, 2005, the current situation for bariatric surgery has been examined by means of a voluntary quality assurance study in Germany with a multicenter design in which 38 hospitals and surgical departments participated. The data are registered in cooperation with the Institute of Quality Assurance in Surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg (Germany). Methods  Data describing peri-interventional characteristics were prospectively documented in an internet online data registry. All primary bariatric procedures performed since January 1st, 2005, were registered. In addition, reoperations in patients who had previously undergone primary surgical intervention were included. As a representative excerpt from the overall prospective multicenter observational study on obesity surgery, data on the type, regimen, and time course of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis were documented. From the number and spectrum of complications, the incidences of clinically manifest DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE) were derived during the in-hospital course and follow-up in conjunction with the type of surgical procedure and body mass index (BMI). Results  Overall, 3,122 bariatric procedures were performed at 38 German hospitals between January 2005 and December 2007. These procedures were subdivided into 2,869 primary operations and 253 revisions (sex ratio, male to female = 25.6:74.4%). The average BMI of all patients was 48.5 kg/m2 in 2005, 48.4 kg/m2 in 2006, and 48.0 kg/m2 in 2007. In 2005 and 2006, gastric banding (GB) was the most commonly performed operation, followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). In 2007, RYGBP was carried out in 42.1% of all bariatric procedures. Interestingly, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was only 0.06%, whereas PE occurred in 0.06% of patients only after hospital discharge. The DVT prophylaxis protocol used has been changed for the last 2 years: the majority of patients with a BMI above 50 kg/m2 received low-molecular-weight heparin twice a day. Conclusion  In Germany, a trend from GB to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and malabsorptive approach has been evaluated. This trend is associated with differences of the DVT prophylaxis regimen in the profile of bariatric surgical patients depending on BMI and the type of bariatric procedure. Despite the low incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) detected, there is a lack of evidence on a reasonable regimen for sufficient DVT prophylaxis in bariatric surgery; instead, there are only recommendations from the guidelines and statements of a specific medical society. Therefore, prospective studies are necessary to determine the optimal DVT prophylaxis for bariatric surgical patients as well as obese patients undergoing surgery.     

What is the Future of Surgery in the UK?

Surgery is an invasive form of treatment and must be a ‘last resort’. Research into conditions that can be treated by surgery aims to make it extinct, by discovering the basis for various disease processes and treating them medically. A prime example of this is peptic ulceration, which was the ‘bread and butter’ of surgical training in the UK in the 1970s and 1980s, but is now a condition that has almost vanished from the surgical lexicon with the discovery of Helicobacter pylori and its treatment by triple therapy and proton pump inhibitors. In the ‘molecular age’, there is a strong possibility that other areas of surgery (which currently keep many surgeons occupied) will also diminish in volume and importance. Further, it would be worth looking briefly at a number of different specialties within surgery and speculating where changes may occur in the future, perhaps making operations less necessary. In those areas where molecular advances have not (or will not) eradicate open surgery, there will be a definite tendency towards minimally invasive procedures, even though the introduction of such procedures is seldom evidence based.