Prognostic effect of preoperative serum albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundAccurate identification of ideal candidates for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an unmet need. We tested the association between preoperative value of systemic albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN.MethodsmRCC patients treated with CN were included. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using cut-off of 1.43 (low, <1.43 vs. high, ≥1.43). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association between AGR and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel’s concordance index (C-index). The clinical value of the AGR was evaluated with decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsAmong 613 mRCC patients, 159 (26%) patients had an AGR <1.43. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR: 16–58) months. On univariable analysis, low preoperative serum AGR was significantly associated with both OS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.26–1.89, P<0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27–1.90, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, AGR <1.43 was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.23–1.85, P<0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.24–1.86, P<0.001). The addition of AGR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index=0.640 vs. C-index=0.629). On DCA, the inclusion of AGR marginally improved the net benefit of the prognostic model. Low AGR remained independently associated with OS and CSS in the IMDC intermediate risk group (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–1.99, P=0.002).ConclusionsIn our study, low AGR before CN was associated with worse OS and CSS, particularly in intermediate risk patients.     

Albumin levels predict prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeWith the development of therapy and prognostic criteria for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), the prognostic value of serum albumin level has remained in dispute. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of pre-treatment albumin in predicting the prognosis of mRCC patients in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments.MethodsThe qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception of these databases to July 19, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from studies comparing different levels of pre-treatment serum albumin (as a dichotomous or continuous variable) in mRCC patients treated with TKI agents.ResultsWithin 5,638 primitive records, 16 were eligible and 14 had adequate data for quantitative analysis (N = 2,863 participants). Random-effects meta-analysis showed that lower albumin was related to poorer OS (dichotomous: HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.64-2.46, P < 0.001, I² = 28.8%; continuous: HR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00, P = 0.040, I² = 67.5%) and PFS (dichotomous: HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.01, P = 0.029, I² = 57.4%; continuous: HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98, P = 0.023, I² = 93.3%).ConclusionLower pre-treatment serum albumin level is an independent adverse predictor of prognosis of mRCC patients receiving TKI therapy.RegistrationPROSPERO ID: CRD42020196802 Sep. 2^nd, 2020     

Impact of modified Glasgow prognostic score on predicting prognosis and modification of risk model for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Introduction and ObjectivesIntermediate risk group of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria is thought to consist of patients with different prognoses. This study investigated the impact of a pretreated modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which is defined on the basis of the pretreated serum albumin and C-reactive protein level, on predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and its usefulness for the re-stratification of patients into a more improved risk model.Materials and MethodsOne hundred ninety-six mRCC patients treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were retrospectively investigated. All patients were classified into either a high-mGPS or a low-mGPS group on the basis of mGPS score upon starting systemic therapy, the overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) rates in each group were compared. We use decision curve analysis and calculate C-index based on OS and CSS to compare IMDC+mGPS model and IMDC model.ResultsThe categories of favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups in the IMDC model were assessed in 32, 113, and 51 cases, respectively. The low- and high-mGPS groups consisted of 149 and 47 cases. The median OS in the high- and low-mGPS groups were 38.4 months and 5.6 months, and their median CSSs were 41.0 months and 5.6 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that a high mGPS, multiple metastatic organs, and hypercalcemia were independent predictive factors for a worse OS (P = 0.0260). Next, we divided the intermediate risk group into two subgroups using the mGPS score. The OS and CSS for the high-mGPS subgroup were significantly worse than those for the low-mGPS one (P = 0.0024, median OS: 21.0 months and 33.7 months, P = 0.0007, median CSS: 21.0 months and 39.8 months), and there was no significant difference in OS between the high-mGPS subgroup in the intermediate risk group and poor risk group (P = 0.2250). The value of C-index based on OS at IMDC and IMDC+mGPS model were 0.6771 and 0.6967, and those based on CSS were 0.6850 and 0.7080, respectively. In decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical net benefit using the IMDC+mGPS model compared to the IMDC model, there was no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionmGPS is useful for establishing a more improved prognostic model that is able to stratify mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI.     

The impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy on survival outcomes in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world cohort

BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (TKI) has changed the treatment paradigm of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The recent CARMENA and SURTIME trials challenged the role of the cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN).ObjectiveTo assess the impact of CN prior to TKI therapy in patients with mRCC in a real-world setting.MethodsOverall, 262 consecutive patients with mRCC were treated with CN plus TKI or TKI only at our institution between 2000 and 2016. Patients with prior immunotherapy or metastasectomy were excluded. Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to account for missing values and imbalances between the treatment groups, respectively. Unadjusted and adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine differences in progression-free (PFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsOverall, 104 (40%) patients received CN before TKI treatment. Most frequent first line therapy was Sunitinib (66%), followed by Sorafenib (20%) and Pazopanib (10%). After adjustment with IPTW, there was no difference in PFS, CSS, and OS (all P > 0.05) between the treatment groups. In subgroup analyses, CSS was improved when CN was performed in patients with sarcomatoid features and clear cell histology (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03) and PFS was improved in patients with clear cell histology when CN was performed [0.04]). CN did not improve OS in any subgroup analysis.ConclusionThe role of CN remains controversial. We found no difference in survival outcomes between patients treated with and without CN before TKI therapy. However, CN was associated with improved survival in specific patient subgroups. Tailored, individualized treatment is key to further improve oncological outcomes for mRCC.     

C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are prognostic in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of markers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on outcomes of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) patients treated with nivolumab.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab and collected known prognostic factors and survival data. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and cox proportional hazards regression analysis to study prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) since start of nivolumab. Harrell's C-index was used to evaluate the models.ResultsWe included 113 patients. Median OS and PFS after initiation of nivolumab was 15 (interquartile range 7–28) and 4 months (interquartile range 3–11), respectively.Elevated baseline CRP was associated with worse OS (HR per 25 mg/l 1.35, 95% CI 1.16–1.52, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR per 25 mg/l 1.19, 95% CI 1.08–1.35, P = 0.001), independent from the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC) prognostic criteria, increasing the model's C-index from 0.72 to 0.77 for OS and 0.59 to 0.62 for PFS.Elevated NLR was associated with worse OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04–1.17, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.11, P = 0.03) independent from the other IMDC prognostic criteria. The model's C-index decreased from 0.72 to 0.70 for OS and increased from 0.59 to 0.60 for PFS.ConclusionsElevated baseline CRP and NLR predict worse OS and PFS on nivolumab in m-ccRCC patients. Including baseline CRP in the IMDC prognostic model improves its discriminatory power to predict OS and PFS since start of nivolumab.     

Evaluation of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in a European cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

ObjectivesRecent evidence suggests that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response plays an important role in the progression of several solid tumors. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been proposed as an easily assessable marker of systemic inflammation and has been shown to represent a prognostic marker in different cancer entities. To evaluate the prognostic value of the PLR in prostate cancer, we performed the present study.Methods and materialsData from 374 consecutive patients with prostate cancer, treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy from 1999 to 2007, were analyzed. Distant metastases–free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), biochemical disease–free survival, and time to salvage systemic therapy were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for other covariates.ResultsUsing receiver operating characteristics analysis, the optimal cutoff level for the PLR was 190. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that PLR≥190 was a prognostic factor for decreased MFS (P = 0.004), CSS (P = 0.004), and OS (P = 0.024) whereas a significant association of an elevated PLR with biochemical disease–free survival (P = 0.740) and time to salvage systemic therapy (P = 0.063) was not detected. In multivariate analysis, an increased PLR remained a significant prognostic factor for poor MFS (HR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.06–4.76, P = 0.036), CSS (HR = 3.99, 95% CI: 1.19–13.4, P = 0.025), and OS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.02–3.42, P = 0.044).ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the PLR may predict prognosis in patients with prostate cancer and may contribute to future individual risk assessment in them.     

The effect of metastasectomy on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeMetastasectomy (MTS) is a treatment option for patients diagnosed with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Nevertheless, the benefits of MTS as they pertain to survival remain controversial. This systematic review aims to compare the survival outcomes of patients who underwent MTS, as well as discover which clinical factors were related to the results.MethodsFrom their inception up to August 2020, a systematic review of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of science databases was performed. Studies which reported outcomes on patients who underwent MTS for the treatment of mRCC were included. The sites, times, amount, histology types of metastasis, and prior nephrectomy were also analyzed. The primary efficacy end point was Overall Survival (OS). A meta-analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and I² values. Forest plots were constructed for each analysis group.ResultsThe systematic review and reference list search identified 294 articles, with 17 meeting studies as inclusion criteria. The MTS group showed a competitive advantage in OS, in that the non-MTS group was negatively associated with an overall survival rate (HR [non-MTS vs. MTS] = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.59–2.92, P< 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with the most recently available target therapy without MTS showed a significantly increased risk compared with the MTS group (HR = 1.82, 95% CI:1.23–2.70, P= 0.003). Additionally, meta-analysis revealed HR elevating in patients with nonlung only metastasis (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.55–2.26, P< 0.001), synchronous metastasis (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.10–1.49, P= 0.001), and multiple metastases (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64–2.59, P< 0.001). Clear-cell type mRCC (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48–0.82, P= 0.0006) and prior nephrectomy (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15–0.91, P= 0.03) were positively associated with a better overall survival rate.ConclusionsMTS is a treatment option for mRCC patients with prolonged overall survival time. The operation has additional advantages, particularly in patients with lung only metastasis, asynchronous metastasis, fewer metastasis sites, clear-cell type mRCC, and the patients who had received nephrectomy.     

Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia and Albumin in the Surgical Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma

IntroductionA universally accepted model for preoperative surgical risk stratification in localized RCC patients undergoing nephrectomy is currently lacking. Both the evaluation of body composition and nutritional status has demonstrated prognostic value for patients with cancer. This study aims to investigate the potential associations between sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia and survival outcomes in patients with localized kidney cancer treated with partial or radical nephrectomy.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 473 patients with localized RCC managed with radical and partial nephrectomy. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured from preoperative CT and MRI. Sarcopenic criteria were created using BMI- and sex-stratified thresholds. Relationships between sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia (Albumin <3.5 g/dL) with overall (OS), recurrence-free (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined using multivariable and Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsOf the 473 patients, 42.5% were sarcopenic and 24.5% had hypoalbuminemia. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR=1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.13), however, was nonsignificant in the RFS (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.88-2.03) and CSS (HR=1.66, 95% CI 0.96-2.87) models. Hypoalbuminemia predicted shorter OS (HR=1.76, 95% CI 1.22-2.55), RFS (HR=1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.89), and CSS (HR=1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.22). Patients were then stratified into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on the severity of sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia. Risk groups demonstrated an increasing association with shorter OS (all p<0.05). Reduced RFS was observed in the medium risk-hypoalbuminemia (HR=2.18, 95% CI 1.16-4.09) and high-risk groups (HR=2.42, 95% CI 1.34-4.39). Shorter CSS was observed in the medium risk-hypoalbuminemia (HR=2.31, 95% CI 1.00-5.30) and high-risk groups (HR=2.98, 95% CI 1.34-6.61).ConclusionLocalized RCC patients with combined preoperative sarcopenia and hypoalbuminemia displayed a two to a three-fold reduction in OS, RFS, and CSS after nephrectomy. These data have implications for guiding prognostication and treatment election in localized RCC patients undergoing extirpative surgery.     

Efficacy and safety of immunological checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic drugs in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results for the second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Several randomized controlled trials have so far also evaluated the efficacy of ICIs for first-line treatment of mRCC. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies to further clarify the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic drugs for the treatment of mRCC.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for RCT trials of ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic drugs for first-line treatment of mRCC published before November 20, 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted based on methodological recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration.ResultsFour articles with a total of 2,967 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were significantly improved in the experimental group while there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67–0.84; HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.07–1.91; HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53–1.03). After stratification for PD-L1 expression, OS, PFS, and ORR of PD-L1 positive patients were significantly increased in the experimental group (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.96; HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.11–2.49; HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.57–0.75).ConclusionsImmunological checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic drugs as a first-line treatment for mRCC improve PFS and ORR. This effect is more pronounced in PD-L1 positive patients, where ICIs also improve OS. ICIs do not increase the incidence of adverse events.     

Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

BackgroundTo investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (BCa).Patients and methodsA cohort of 263 patients undergoing open or laparoscopic radical cystectomy between 2011 and 2016 was studied. Baseline characteristics, hematological variables, follow-up data were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression model were applied to assess the relationship between LDH and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsAfter a median 34.2 (22.9–45.8) months follow-up, all-cause death, cancer-specific death, and disease recurrence occurred in 66 patients, 50 patients, and 91 patients. The elevation of serum LDH was associated with several unfavorable parameters, including advanced age, continent cutaneous urinary diversion, increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, decreased lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. Patients with a higher serum LDH (> 220 U/L) had a worse OS (P < 0.001), CSS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis suggested that elevated LDH was an independent predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.113, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.524–6.358; P = 0.002), CSS (HR: 4.564, 95% CI: 2.008–10.373; P < 0.001), DFS (HR: 2.051, 95% CI: 1.125–3.739; P = 0.019). Medical history of diabetes, high pT stage, and positive lymph node also were adverse predictors for oncological outcomes of BCa patients in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsPreoperative serum LDH is an independent prognostic biomarker for OS, CSS, and DFS in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for BCa, which can be incorporated into prognostic models.     

Effect of concomitant variant histology on the prognosis of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic effect of concomitant variant histology (CVH) on survival outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy.Materials and methodsData on 417 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy without preoperative adjuvant therapy were retrospectively reviewed with a focus on CVH. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors were compared between patients with pure UTUC and patients with UTUC with CVH. The primary end points were cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease recurrence-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsUTUC with CVH was present in 90 (21.6%) of 417 patients. At a median follow-up of 26 months, 153 (36.7%) had died of UTUC, 161 (38.6%) had experienced a relapse, and 176 (42.2%) had died of other causes. UTUC with CVH was significantly associated with advanced tumor stage, high tumor grade, tumor diameter, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, positive surgical margins, and tumor architecture compared with pure UTUC (all P<0.01). The estimated 5-year CSS, DFS, and OS rates were 64.9%, 61.1%, and 62.1%, respectively, in the pure UTUC group, compared with 36.3%, 34.3%, and 26.5%, respectively, in the UTUC with CVH group (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CVH was an independent predictor of CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.594; 95% CI: 1.125–2.259; P = 0.009), DFS (HR = 1.549; 95% CI: 1.077–2.152; P = 0.017), and OS (HR = 1.685; 95% CI: 1.212–2.343; P = 0.002).ConclusionsApproximately one-fifth of the specimens of patients with UTUC were observed to exhibit CVH. CVH was an independent prognostic factor for CSS, DFS, and OS in patients with UTUC on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Genitourinary pathologists should look for potential CVH components in UTUC specimens and report this in routine pathological practice. The presence of CVH should identify patients as candidates for consultation regarding early adjuvant therapy and intensive surveillance protocols.     

Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors or Targeted Therapy: An Observational Study from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

BackgroundThe role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between upfront CN and clinical outcomes in the setting of mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy.Design, setting, and participantsUsing the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, we retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with de novo mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regressions adjusting for known prognostic factors.Results and limitationsWe identified a total of 4639 eligible patients with mRCC. Among the 4202 patients treated with targeted therapy and 437 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2326 (55%) and 234 (54%) patients received upfront CN prior to treatment start. In multivariable analyses, CN was associated with significantly better OS in both the immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.90, p = 0.013) and the targeted therapy treatment (HR: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78, p < 0.001) group. There was no difference in OS benefit of CN between the immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy treatment groups (interaction p = 0.6). Limitations include selection of patients from large academic centers and the retrospective nature of the study.ConclusionsUpfront CN is associated with a significant OS benefit in selected patients treated by either immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy, and still has a role in selected patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Patient summaryBefore effective systemic therapies were available for metastatic kidney cancer, surgical removal of the primary (kidney) tumor was the mainstay of treatment. The role of removing the primary tumor has recently been called into question given that more effective systemic therapies have become available. In this study, we find that removal of the primary kidney tumor still has a benefit for selected patients treated with highly effective modern systemic therapies, including targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.     

Prognostic nutritional index and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and methodsEligible studies that evaluated the prognostic impact of pretreatment PNI in RCC patients were identified by comprehensive searching the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Search library, and EMBASE. The end points were overall/cancer-specific survival (OS/CSS) and recurrence-free/disease-free survival (RFS/DFS). Meta-analysis using random-effects models was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsIn total, 9 retrospective, observational, case-control studies involving 5,976 patients were included for final analysis. Eight studies evaluated OS/CSS, and 5 evaluated RFS/DFS. Our results showed that lower PNI was significantly associated with unfavorable OS/CSS (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.44-1.96, P < 0.001, I² = 9.2%, P = 0.359) and RFS/DFS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.57-2.50, P < 0.001, I² = 18.2%, P = 0.299) in patients with RCC. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis based on ethnicity, study sample size, presence of metastasis, PNI cut-off value, Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) score, and gender ratio all showed that lower PNI was associated with poorer OS/CSS and RFS/DFS. Funnel plots and Egger's tests indicated significant publication bias in OS/CSS (P = 0.001), but not in RFS/DFS (P = 0.757).ConclusionThis meta-analysis indicated that lower PNI was a negative prognostic factor and associated with tumor progression and poorer survival of patients with RCC. Therefore, PNI could be a potential prognostic predictor of treatment outcomes for patients with RCC.     

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy

ContextTo improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy.ObjectiveTo update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC.Evidence acquisitionWe searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.Evidence synthesisFor NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24–0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69–0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38–0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC.ConclusionsNAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment.Patient summaryAfter a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Whether histologic subtyping affect the oncological outcomes of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundWhether the histologic subtype (type 1 and type 2) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a tool to predict the prognosis is of great debate. This study is aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of histologic subtype in patients with pRCC after surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Web of Science, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases to identify studies published until January 20, 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared the overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with type 1 or type 2 pRCC. And the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% conference intervals (CIs) were collected for meta-analysis and further subgroup analysis.ResultsOverall 22 studies with a total of 4,494 patients were considered eligible and included for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that type 2 pRCC was associated with a worse OS (pooled HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10–2.36, P=0.02) and CSS (pooled HR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00–2.51, P=0.05). However, the subgroup analysis yielded the same result as the initial analysis only when the HRs were extracted from univariate analysis. In studies with multivariate analysis, type 2 pRCC was not statistically associated with a worse OS (pooled HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97–1.53, P=0.27), CSS (pooled HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.67–2.00, P=0.60), and DFS (pooled HR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.93–1.91, P=0.12) compared to type 1 pRCC.DiscussionHistologic subtype is not an independent prognostic factor for patients with pRCC, although the result needs to be taken with caution. And studies with retrospective study design, larger sample size and longer follow-up period are required to verify these results.     

Clinical outcome in patients receiving systemic therapy for metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis☆

ObjectivesSarcomatoid metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents an aggressive subset of disease, and a definitive therapeutic strategy is lacking. We seek to define outcomes associated with systemic therapy (including immunotherapy, cytotoxic therapy, and targeted agents) for sarcomatoid mRCC, with attention to novel prognostic schema.Materials and methodsFrom an institutional database including 270 patients with mRCC, we identified 34 patients with documented sarcomatoid features. Within this cohort, we assessed 21 patients who received systemic therapy. Survival was assessed in the overall cohort and in subgroups divided by clinicopathologic characteristics, including the extent of sarcomatoid features, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk criteria, Heng criteria, and the nature of systemic therapy rendered.ResultsOf the 21 patients assessed, 2 patients received chemotherapy, 7 patients received immunotherapy, and 12 patients received targeted agents as their first line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the overall cohort was 18.0 months (95% CI 6.9–22.0). By MSKCC criteria, patients with poor-risk disease had a median OS of 4.7 months, compared with 20.1 months for patients with intermediate-risk disease [hazard ratio (HR) 0.02, 95%CI 0.003–0.15; P = 0.0001]. A similar difference in median OS was seen poor- and intermediate-risk groups when stratifying by Heng criteria (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.001–0.12). There was no significant difference in survival in patients with sarcomatoid predominant disease vs. nonpredominant disease (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.23–1.65; P = 0.34), nor was there a difference amongst patients who received targeted therapies vs. nontargeted therapies (HR 1.0, 95%CI 0.61–1.40; P = 0.36).ConclusionsCompared with previous series and prospective trials assessing patients with sarcomatoid mRCC, the observed survival was prolonged. Although both Heng and MSKCC risk scores may be useful in determining prognosis, further studies are needed to identify relevant biomarkers and define the optimal therapeutic strategy for this disease.     

A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy

BackgroundCytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was called into question following the publication of the CARMENA trial. While previous retrospective studies have supported CN alongside targeted therapies, there is minimal research establishing its role in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between CN and oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy.Materials and methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2000 and 2020 who were treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and The Ohio State University and who were treated with ICI systemic therapy (ST) at any point in their disease course. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with mortality.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 367 patients (CN+ST n = 232, ST alone n = 135). Among patients undergoing CN, 30 were deferred. Median survivor follow-up was 28.4 months. ICI therapy was first-line in 28.1%, second-line in 17.4%, and third or subsequent line (3L+) in 54.5% of patients. Overall, patients who underwent CN+ST had longer median OS (56.3 months IQR 50.2–79.8) compared to the ST alone group (19.1 months IQR 12.8–23.8). Multivariable analyses demonstrated a 67% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received CN+ST vs. ST alone (P < 0.0001). Similar results were noted when first-line ICI therapy recipients were examined as a subgroup. Upfront and deferred CN did not demonstrate significant differences in OS.ConclusionsCN was independently associated with longer OS in patients with mRCC treated with ICI in any line of therapy. Our data support consideration of CN in well selected patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with ICI.     

Cachexia index in predicting outcomes among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although some patients benefit greatly from ICI treatments, an effective marker to determine which patients will benefit from these treatments is lacking. Moreover, chronic inflammation and sarcopenia have been associated with poor survival rates among cancer patients. Accordingly, in this study, we investigated how the cachexia index (CXI), used as a combined score for sarcopenia and chronic inflammation, affects the survival outcomes of patients with mRCC receiving ICI.MethodsWe retrospectively screened data from 52 mRCC patients who had followed up between October 2010 and October 2021 after receiving ICI as a second-line or later treatment. Patients’ respective basal CXI score were calculated according to the following formula, based on their L3 vertebral skeletal musculoskeletal area (SMI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and albumin (Alb) levels: CXI = (SMI x Alb) / NLR. Additionally, we analyzed how patients’ subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), body mass index (BMI), ECOG performance status, The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, nephrectomy status, sites of metastasis, and histological subtypes affected survival outcomes.ResultsOur univariate analysis significantly associated CXI score, NLR, nephrectomy status, and patient age with overall survival (OS). However, only CXI scores’ significance was confirmed through multivariate analysis. The median OS (mOS) was 7 months for patients whose CXI score < the median value and 48 months for patients with a CXI score ≥ the median value. (HR 4.5, 95% CI [1.9-11], p = 0.001). Only CXI was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4 months for patients whose CXI score < the median value and 17 months for patients with a CXI score ≥ the median value. (HR 2.6, 95% CI [1.3, 5.3], p = 0.007). Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and sarcopenia combined with NLR were not found to significantly affect OS.ConclusionOur findings suggest that CXI score, a combined indicator of sarcopenia and chronic inflammation parameters, may serve as a useful marker in predicting the outcomes of ICI-based treatments for mRCC patients.     

Low ERCC1 expression is associated with prolonged survival in patients with bladder cancer receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PurposeExcision repair cross-complementation group 1 enzyme (ERCC1) plays a key role in the removal of platinum induced DNA adducts and cisplatin resistance. Prognostic role of ERCC1 expression in the neoadjuvant setting in bladder cancer has not been reported before. We evaluated the prognostic role of ERCC1 expression in bladder cancer receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Materials and methodsThirty-eight patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy were included. Clinical and histopathologic parameters along with immunohistochemical ERCC1 staining were examined and correlated with response rates and survival.ResultsPathologic complete response rates were similar between patients with low and high ERCC1 expression. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 9.3 vs. 20.5 months (P = 0.186) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 vs. 26.7 months (P = 0.058) in patients with high ERCC1 expression compared with those with low expression, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis: pathological complete response (pCR) after chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.1, 95% CI 0.012–0.842, P = 0.034) and high ERCC1 expression (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2–11.2, P = 0.019) were significantly associated with DFS. Patient age (>60 vs. ≤60 years) (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2–9.4, P = 0.018), the presence of pCR (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.014–0.981, P = 0.048) and high ERCC expression (HR 6.1, 95 CI 1.9–19.9, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with OS.ConclusionsOur results showed that high ERCC1 expression was independently associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival in patients with bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. ERCC1 may represent a potential predictive marker for platinum-based treatment in bladder cancer.     

Population-based outcome of muscle-invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy?

BackgroundThe benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) after radical cystectomy. The present study’s primary objective was to construct a predictive tool for the reasonable application of adjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsAll of the patients analyzed in the present study were recruited from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce inherent selection bias. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify the independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), which were further used to construct prognostic nomogram and risk stratification systems to predict survival outcomes. The prognostic nomogram’s performance was assessed by concordance index (C-index), receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical net benefit of the prognostic nomogram.ResultsA total of 6,384 patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy were included after PSM. Several independent predictors for OS and CSS were identified and further applied to establish a nomogram for 3-, 5- and 10-year, respectively. The nomogram showed favorable discriminative ability for the prediction of OS and CSS, with a C-index of 0.709 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.699–0.719] for OS and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.718–0.738) for CSS. ROC and calibration curves showed satisfactory consistency. The DCA revealed high clinical positive net benefits of the prognostic nomogram. The different risk stratification systems showed that adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in better OS (P<0.001) and CSS (P<0.001) than without adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients; while the OS (P=0.350) and CSS (P=0.260) for low-risk patients were comparable.ConclusionsWe have constructed a predictive model and different risk stratifications for selecting a population that could benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be beneficial for high-risk patients, while low-risk patients should be carefully monitored.