Association of preoperative serum De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PurposeIdentifying which patients are likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is important. We tested the association between preoperative serum De Ritis ratio (DRR, Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN.Material and methodsmRCC patients treated with CN at different institutions were included. After assessing for the optimal pretreatment DRR cut‐off value, we found 1.2 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into 2 DRR groups using this cut‐off (low, <1.2 vs. high, ≥1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association between DRR and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index). The clinical value of the DRR was evaluated with decision curve analysis.ResultsAmong 613 mRCC patients, 239 (39%) patients had a DRR ≥1.2. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR 16–58) months. On univariable analysis, high DRR was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.46, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02–1.47, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, high DRR remained significantly associated with both OS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.52, P = 0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05–1.53, P = 0.01). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.633 vs. C-index = 0.629). On decision curve analysis, the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit beyond that obtained by established subgroup analyses stratified by IMDC risk groups, type of systemic therapy, body mass index and sarcomatoid features, did not reveal any prognostic value to DRR.ConclusionDespite the statistically significant association between DRR and OS as well as CSS in mRCC patients treated with CN, DRR does not seem to add any further prognostic value beyond that obtained by currently available features.     

Impact of modified Glasgow prognostic score on predicting prognosis and modification of risk model for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Introduction and ObjectivesIntermediate risk group of the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria is thought to consist of patients with different prognoses. This study investigated the impact of a pretreated modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which is defined on the basis of the pretreated serum albumin and C-reactive protein level, on predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and its usefulness for the re-stratification of patients into a more improved risk model.Materials and MethodsOne hundred ninety-six mRCC patients treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were retrospectively investigated. All patients were classified into either a high-mGPS or a low-mGPS group on the basis of mGPS score upon starting systemic therapy, the overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) rates in each group were compared. We use decision curve analysis and calculate C-index based on OS and CSS to compare IMDC+mGPS model and IMDC model.ResultsThe categories of favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups in the IMDC model were assessed in 32, 113, and 51 cases, respectively. The low- and high-mGPS groups consisted of 149 and 47 cases. The median OS in the high- and low-mGPS groups were 38.4 months and 5.6 months, and their median CSSs were 41.0 months and 5.6 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that a high mGPS, multiple metastatic organs, and hypercalcemia were independent predictive factors for a worse OS (P = 0.0260). Next, we divided the intermediate risk group into two subgroups using the mGPS score. The OS and CSS for the high-mGPS subgroup were significantly worse than those for the low-mGPS one (P = 0.0024, median OS: 21.0 months and 33.7 months, P = 0.0007, median CSS: 21.0 months and 39.8 months), and there was no significant difference in OS between the high-mGPS subgroup in the intermediate risk group and poor risk group (P = 0.2250). The value of C-index based on OS at IMDC and IMDC+mGPS model were 0.6771 and 0.6967, and those based on CSS were 0.6850 and 0.7080, respectively. In decision curve analysis to evaluate the clinical net benefit using the IMDC+mGPS model compared to the IMDC model, there was no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionmGPS is useful for establishing a more improved prognostic model that is able to stratify mRCC patients treated with first-line TKI.     

Albumin levels predict prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeWith the development of therapy and prognostic criteria for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC), the prognostic value of serum albumin level has remained in dispute. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of pre-treatment albumin in predicting the prognosis of mRCC patients in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments.MethodsThe qualitative and quantitative synthesis was conducted of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception of these databases to July 19, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from studies comparing different levels of pre-treatment serum albumin (as a dichotomous or continuous variable) in mRCC patients treated with TKI agents.ResultsWithin 5,638 primitive records, 16 were eligible and 14 had adequate data for quantitative analysis (N = 2,863 participants). Random-effects meta-analysis showed that lower albumin was related to poorer OS (dichotomous: HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.64-2.46, P < 0.001, I² = 28.8%; continuous: HR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00, P = 0.040, I² = 67.5%) and PFS (dichotomous: HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.01, P = 0.029, I² = 57.4%; continuous: HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.98, P = 0.023, I² = 93.3%).ConclusionLower pre-treatment serum albumin level is an independent adverse predictor of prognosis of mRCC patients receiving TKI therapy.RegistrationPROSPERO ID: CRD42020196802 Sep. 2^nd, 2020     

A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy

BackgroundCytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was called into question following the publication of the CARMENA trial. While previous retrospective studies have supported CN alongside targeted therapies, there is minimal research establishing its role in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between CN and oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy.Materials and methodsA multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2000 and 2020 who were treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and The Ohio State University and who were treated with ICI systemic therapy (ST) at any point in their disease course. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with mortality.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 367 patients (CN+ST n = 232, ST alone n = 135). Among patients undergoing CN, 30 were deferred. Median survivor follow-up was 28.4 months. ICI therapy was first-line in 28.1%, second-line in 17.4%, and third or subsequent line (3L+) in 54.5% of patients. Overall, patients who underwent CN+ST had longer median OS (56.3 months IQR 50.2–79.8) compared to the ST alone group (19.1 months IQR 12.8–23.8). Multivariable analyses demonstrated a 67% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received CN+ST vs. ST alone (P < 0.0001). Similar results were noted when first-line ICI therapy recipients were examined as a subgroup. Upfront and deferred CN did not demonstrate significant differences in OS.ConclusionsCN was independently associated with longer OS in patients with mRCC treated with ICI in any line of therapy. Our data support consideration of CN in well selected patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with ICI.     

Prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab

ObjectivesEvidence regarding the prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains limited in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line systemic therapy. Thus, we investigated the association between irAE development and oncological outcomes during nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 46 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at our hospital and its affiliated institutions. The associations between irAE development and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rates (ORRs) were assessed after treatment initiation.ResultsA total of 60 irAEs occurred in 33 patients (72%), with 24 grade ≥ 3 irAEs developed in 20 patients (43%). PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P < 0.0001); however, OS was not different (P = 0.571). Multivariable analysis further revealed that the development of irAEs was an independent predictor of a longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.18, P = 0.0005). A landmark analysis for the initial four cycles of nivolumab plus ipilimumab administration also showed that PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than that in patients without irAEs (P = 0.0386). The ORRs were also higher in patients with irAEs (P = 0.0064). Furthermore, in 22 patients (48%) who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment, the 6-month PFS rate was 87%.ConclusionThis multi-institutional study showed that irAE development was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy. The development of irAEs may be used as a surrogate prognostic marker for PFS in this treatment regimen.     

External validation of the REMARCC model for the selection of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

ObjectivesThis study aims to evaluate the utility of the scoring system of the Registry for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (REMARCC) model on the overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN).MethodsA total of 278 patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between January 2008 and November 2019 were identified. The c-index and net benefit between the REMARCC score were compared with the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score in patients with CN (CN group, n = 146). The effect of the REMARCC score on OS was compared between the CN group and patients without CN (non-CN group, n = 132) using Cox regression analysis under the propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to adjust for group imbalances.ResultsOf the 146 patients with CN, the c-index of the REMARCC model (0.60) was higher than the IMDC model (0.54). The decision curve analysis showed the advantage of REMARCC model predicting OS compared with the IMDC model. OS was significantly longer in the REMARCC low-score (0–2) than that in the high-score (3–6) among the patients with CN. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that OS was significantly longer in the CN group than that in the non-CN group among the patients with REMARCC low-score but was not significantly different between the groups among the patients with REMARCC high-score.ConclusionsThe REMARCC score may be active for selecting the CN candidate in patients treated with TKIs.     

Prognostic effect of preoperative serum albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundAccurate identification of ideal candidates for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an unmet need. We tested the association between preoperative value of systemic albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN.MethodsmRCC patients treated with CN were included. The overall population was therefore divided into two AGR groups using cut-off of 1.43 (low, <1.43 vs. high, ≥1.43). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association between AGR and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel’s concordance index (C-index). The clinical value of the AGR was evaluated with decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsAmong 613 mRCC patients, 159 (26%) patients had an AGR <1.43. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR: 16–58) months. On univariable analysis, low preoperative serum AGR was significantly associated with both OS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.26–1.89, P<0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27–1.90, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, AGR <1.43 was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.23–1.85, P<0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.24–1.86, P<0.001). The addition of AGR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index=0.640 vs. C-index=0.629). On DCA, the inclusion of AGR marginally improved the net benefit of the prognostic model. Low AGR remained independently associated with OS and CSS in the IMDC intermediate risk group (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–1.99, P=0.002).ConclusionsIn our study, low AGR before CN was associated with worse OS and CSS, particularly in intermediate risk patients.     

Predictive impact of an early change in serum C-reactive protein levels in nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

ObjectiveTo investigate the predictive impact of a change in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels during the early phase of nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Patients and methodsSeventy mRCC patients treated with nivolumab after molecular-targeted therapy failure were retrospectively evaluated. Based on the CRP change, patients were classified as (1) normal: if pretreatment levels were <1 mg/dl; (2) normalized: if pretreatment levels were ≥1.0 mg/dl and nadir levels within the initial three months of nivolumab therapy declined to <1.0 mg/dl; and (3) non-normalized: if pretreatment levels were ≥1 mg/dl and nadir levels remained ≥1.0 mg/dl. The predictive association between the CRP change and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after nivolumab initiation was evaluated.ResultsThe PFS was significantly lower in the non-normalized group (n = 25, 35.7%) than in the normal (n = 29, 41.4%) (median: 2.33 vs. 6.28 months, P = 0.0009) and normalized (n = 16, 22.9%) (2.33 vs. 8.38 months, P = 0.0006) groups, while no differences were observed between normal and normalized groups (P = 0.610). The OS was significantly lower in the non-normalized group than in the normal (8.02 months vs. not reached, P < 0.0001) and normalized groups (8.02 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.0047); further, the OS of the normalized group was lower than that of the normal group (P = 0.0454). Multivariate analyses showed that the CRP change was an independent factor for PFS (P = 0.0025) and OS (P = 0.0009).ConclusionsThe CRP change during the early phase of nivolumab therapy was significantly associated with mRCC patient survival and may thus be used for outcome prediction.     

Role of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

PurposeCirculating tumor cells (CTC) have been demonstrated to have prognostic and predictive role in certain human cancers. However, studies exploring their role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of CTC in mRCC.Materials and methodsIn this prospective study, 35 patients with mRCC were analyzed for the presence of CTC before starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Progression-free and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. The prediction to TKI therapy was calculated with the response to treatment determined by standard imaging techniques.ResultsOutcomes were assessed according to the CTC positivity at baseline, before the patients started TKI for mRCC. At a mean follow-up of 12.4 ± 4.1 months, disease progression was noted in 17 patients (48.6%) including 8 deaths (22.9%). CTC positive patients had a significantly lower progression-free survival rate (12.5% vs. 64.1%, respectively; P = 0.009) but not in the overall survival rate (75% vs. 76.3%, respectively; P = 0.88) in the Kaplan–Meier estimation curves. CTC positivity at baseline significantly predicted a poorer response to TKI (87.5% vs. 37.1%, P = 0.01). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that CTC at baseline was the most significant predictor of progression-free survival (hazard ratio 4.17, 95% confidence interval 1.41–11.99, P = 0.01).ConclusionsBaseline CTC detection can be an important prognostic factor of progression-free survival and significant predictor of poor response to TKI in patients with metastatic RCC.     

Improved survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the contemporary immunotherapy era: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

ObjectivesDespite immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approval for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2015, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is guided by extrapolation from earlier classes of therapy. We evaluated survival outcomes, timing, and safety of combining CN with modern immunotherapy (IO) for mRCC.MethodsFrom 96,329 renal cancer cases reported to the NCDB between 2015 and 2016, we analyzed 391 surgical candidates diagnosed with clear cell mRCC treated with IO ± CN and no other systemic therapies. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) stratified by the performance of CN (CN + IO vs. IO alone). Secondary outcomes included OS stratified by the timing of CN, pathologic findings, and perioperative outcomes.ResultsOf 391 patients, 221 (56.5%) received CN + IO and 170 (43.5%) received IO only. Across a median follow-up of 14.7 months, patients who underwent CN + IO had superior OS (median NR vs. 11.6 months; hazard ratio 0.23, P < 0.001), which was upheld on multivariable analyses. IO before CN resulted in lower pT stage, grade, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion rates compared to upfront CN. Two of 20 patients (10%) undergoing CN post-IO achieved complete pathologic response in the primary tumor (pT0). There were no positive surgical margins, 30-day readmissions, or prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing delayed CN.ConclusionUsing a large, national, registry-based cohort, we provide the first report of survival outcomes in mRCC patients treated with CN combined with modern IO. Our findings support an oncologic role for CN in the ICI era and provide preliminary evidence regarding the timing and safety of CN relative to IO administration.     

PAK1 expression determines poor prognosis and immune evasion in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown the prognostic value of PAK1 expression in different tumor patients, including nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. In this study, we explored the prognostic and drug predictive value of PAK1 expression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 138 mRCC patients treated with TKIs from a single institution from 2005 to 2014. Analyses were based on 111 patients who met our inclusion criteria. The validation set enrolled 538 RCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma cohort (TCGA KIRC) between 1998 and 2013 in North America. PAK1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays.ResultsHigh PAK1 expression was associated with short overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.008). Multivariate analyses further indicated that PAK1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 3.301 [95% confidence interval 2.579–10.899], P < 0.001) and PFS (hazard ratio 3.108 [95% confidence interval 1.795–5.381], P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested that PAK1 was more significant in patients with the intermediate risk group of Heng risk criteria (OS, P = 0.004). Of note, patients treated with Sunitinib showed improved outcome in the low PAK1 subgroup (OS, P = 0.002; PFS, P = 0.013). Finally, relationship was found between PAK1 expression and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity according to gene profile investigation.ConclusionsHigh PAK1 expression predicted dismal prognosis in mRCC patients treated with TKIs. Besides, PAK1 was a potential predictor for TKIs treatments.     

Efficacy of everolimus in second- and third-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A registry-based analysis

ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to describe the efficacy and safety of everolimus in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after administration of 1 vs. 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).Patients and methodsA national renal information system database was used as the data source for the retrospective study. There were 483 patients who received everolimus as the second (n = 350) or the third (n = 112) targeted agent following TKIs.ResultsMedian progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of everolimus in the second or the third line of targeted therapy was 6.1 months for both subgroups (P = 0.863). Median total PFS from the start of the first targeted agent to progression on the third targeted agent for patients receiving 3 lines of therapy with TKI-TKI-everolimus (n = 112) and TKI-everolimus-TKI (n = 27) sequences was 28.3 months vs. 31.3 months, respectively (P = 0.16), and there was no significant difference in overall survival. PFS on everolimus was associated with PFS on previous TKIs in patients receiving 1 but not 2 previous TKIs. Only 13% of 352 patients starting targeted therapy for mRCC in 2010 had received 3 sequential targeted agents by the data cutoff in March 2013.ConclusionPFS on everolimus correlated with PFS on TKIs in patients pretreated with 1 but not 2 TKIs. Everolimus can be deferred to the third line without loss of efficacy or increased toxicity. However, only a minority of patients with mRCC starting targeted treatment can be expected to receive third-line therapy.     

靶向治疗时代转移性肾癌多学科综合治疗的单中心经验总结

目的总结在靶向药物治疗基础上单中心转移性肾癌的多学科诊疗经验。方法回顾性分析2007年12月至2019年2月中山大学肿瘤防治中心经多学科诊疗团队(multi-disciplinary team,MDT)诊治的168例转移性肾癌(metastatic renal cell,mRCC)患者的临床数据。根据治疗方式将患者分为3组。单纯靶向药物治疗(A组)76例,男55例,女21例;年龄52(17~73)岁;透明细胞癌60例,非透明细胞癌16例;国际转移性肾细胞癌联合数据库(International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database consortium,IMDC)预后评分低危11例,中危48例,高危17例;初诊时即有转移44例;行原发灶切除术63例。靶向药物治疗+局部治疗(B组)66例,男55例,女11例;年龄54(21~86)岁;透明细胞癌49例,非透明细胞癌17例;IMDC预后评分低危13例,中危39例,高危14例;初诊时即有转移32例;行原发灶切除术56例。靶向药物治疗+局部治疗+免疫治疗(C组)26例,男19例,女7例;年龄52(23~83)岁;透明细胞癌15例,非透明细胞癌11例;IMDC预后评分低危9例,中危13例,高危4例;初诊时即有转移9例;行原发灶切除术26例。3组患者一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。一线靶向治疗药物为舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、阿昔替尼。舒尼替尼50 mg,每日1次,用药4周停2周;索拉非尼400 mg,每日2次;阿昔替尼5 mg,每日2次。接受舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、阿昔替尼一线治疗者分别为103、18、39例。靶向药物治疗时间均>6个月。免疫治疗采用派姆单抗(Pembrolizumab)2 mg/kg静脉应用,每3周1次,或低剂量(20 mg)派姆单抗孵育经体外扩增后的自体外周血树突状细胞细胞因子诱导杀伤细胞(dendritic cells cytokine induced killer,DC.CIK),每周1次,4次后改为每2周1次。18例采用DC.CIK,8例采用派姆单抗。局部治疗方式包括立体定向放疗(stereotactic body radiation therapy,SBRT)和外科治疗(手术切除或能量消融治疗)。根据靶向药物治疗效果,转移灶部位、数量、与周围器官关系,以及患者的意愿,经MDT专家讨论后决定局部治疗方式。92例接受局部治疗,其中单纯外科治疗34例,单纯SBRT 37例,外科治疗+SBRT 21例。比较3组的疗效和不良反应情况,分析不同治疗方法与患者总生存时间(overall survival,OS)的关系。结果168例中位随访23个月(6~117个月)。中位无进展生存时间(progression free-survival,PFS)为18.3个月,中位OS为33.5个月;2年生存率为66%,5年生存率为35%。A、B、C组的中位OS分别为29.8个月、44.6个月和未达,2年生存率分别为58%、67%和89%,5年生存率分别为12%、46%和57%。在靶向药物治疗的基础上接受联合治疗者的预后均优于单纯靶向药物治疗者,5年总OS分别为51%和11%。C组的中高危mRCC患者预后明显优于A、B组。在接受免疫治疗的患者中,靶向药物治疗联合DC.CIK与联合派姆单抗的中位OS分别为49.1个月和53.1个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.541)。单因素分析结果显示,OS与IMDC评分、原发灶切除、治疗模式相关(P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,OS与治疗模式、原发灶切除显著相关(P<0.05),靶向药物治疗+免疫治疗+局部治疗可使mRCC患者死亡风险下降约60%(HR=0.39,95%CI 0.17~0.89,P=0.026)。78例使用靶向药物治疗发生3~4级不良反应,12例因无法耐受一线靶向药物治疗不良反应而停药或换药。16例采用靶向药物联合免疫治疗发生3~4级药物不良反应,主要为疲乏8例次、白细胞降低4例次、血小板降低3例次、转氨酶和胆红素升高3例次。靶向药物治疗联合DC.CIK治疗的严重不良反应发生例数少于联合派姆单抗治疗(6例与12例),特别是显著降低了血液学毒性(2例与5例)和肝毒性(0例与3例),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。外科治疗后出现ClavienⅢ~Ⅳ级并发症16例次,主要为感染和切口延期愈合6例次、不全肠梗阻4例次,围手术期输血15例次。SBRT治疗后6例出现美国放射肿瘤协作组评分(Radiotherapy Oncology Group,RTOG)3级不良反应,其中骨髓抑制4例,皮肤反应和放射性神经炎2例,未观察到≥4级不良反应。结论在靶向药物治疗基础上联合免疫治疗和局部治疗的mRCC患者预后明显优于采用单纯靶向药物治疗的患者。经MDT诊疗的综合治疗可使mRCC患者生存获益。     

Histological variants and lymphovascular invasion in upper tract urothelial carcinoma can stratify prognosis after radical nephroureterectomy

ObjectivesPatients with histological variants (HV) of bladder cancer have more advanced disease and poorer survival rates than those with pure urothelial carcinoma (UC). Moreover, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important biomarker after RNU in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Thus, here we investigated the clinical and prognostic impact of HV and LVI in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).MethodsData from 223 UTUC patients treated with RNU without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed differences in clinicopathological features and survival rates between patients with pure UC and those with HV. Conditional survival (CS) analysis was performed to obtain prognostic information over time.ResultsA total of 32 patients (14.3%) had HV, with the most common variant being squamous differentiation, followed by glandular differentiation. UTUC with HV was significantly associated with advanced pathological T stage (pT ≥ 3), higher tumor grade (G3), and LVI, compared to pure UC (all P < 0.01). Progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), were all significantly worse in the HV group compared to the pure UC group (all, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, HV and LVI were independent predictors of CSS and OS. We classified the patients into three groups using these two predictors: low-risk (neither HV nor LVI), intermediate-risk (either HV or LVI), and high-risk (both HV and LVI). Significant differences in PFS, CSS, and OS rates were found among the 3 groups. In CS analysis, the conditional PFS, CSS, and OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years improved with increased duration of event-free survival. CS analysis revealed that most progression events occurred within 2 years after RNU, and patients with risk factors had worse PFS at all time points.ConclusionsA risk model using HV and LVI can stratify PFS, CSS, and OS of patients treated with RNU. In addition, CS analysis revealed that HV and LVI were poor prognostic factors over time after RNU.     

Role of operative therapy in treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BackgroundOperative resection of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is controversial. Current treatment strategies rely on the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with resultant individualization of operative intervention. We investigated the role of operative therapy in patients with metastatic GIST.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated for metastatic and/or recurrent GIST from January 2002 to June 2011. The patients were stratified by the use of operative therapy and disease response to TKI therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank comparisons tested the effects of operative therapy and the response to TKIs on survival.ResultsOf the 438 patients treated for GIST during the study period, 87 (median age 61 y, interquartile range 50–71; 55% male) had metastatic GIST (84% metastatic, 3% recurrent, and 13% metastatic and recurrent). Of these patients, 54 (62%) underwent operative exploration. Subtotal resection for palliative debulking (R2 resection) were performed in 19 patients; 32 patients underwent R0 resection. Operative intervention was associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with systemic therapy alone (1 y OS, 98% versus 80% and 5-y OS, 65% versus 11%, respectively; P < 0.001). A TKI was used before resection in 32 patients. The disease response was partial in 13 patients, stable in 10, and progressive in 9. The 1- and 5-y OS and progression-free survival were strongly associated with the preoperative response to TKI and an R0 resection (all P ≤ 0.002).ConclusionsAmong patients with metastatic GIST, preoperative response to TKI therapy and margin-negative resection were strongly associated with improved progression-free and OS.     

Association between prior nephrectomy and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundImmune checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy is the standard of care for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). It is unclear whether prior removal of the primary tumor influences the efficacy of these treatments. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of first-line ICI in mRCC to determine whether the efficacy of ICI-therapy, compared to sunitinib, is altered based on receipt of prior nephrectomy.MethodsWe systematically reviewed studies indexed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus and conference abstracts from relevant medical societies as of August 2020 to identify randomized clinical trials assessing first-line immunotherapy-based regimes in mRCC. Studies were included if overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were reported with data stratified by nephrectomy status. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) stratified by nephrectomy status and performed random effects meta-analysis to assess the null hypothesis of no difference in the survival advantage of immunotherapy-based regimes based on nephrectomy status, while accounting for study level correlations.ResultsAmong 6 randomized clinical trials involving 5,121 patients, 3,968 (77%) had undergone prior nephrectomy. We found an overall survival benefit for immunotherapy-based regimes, compared to sunitinib, among both patients who had undergone nephrectomy (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 –0.88) and those who had not (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 –0.92), without evidence of difference based on nephrectomy history (P = 0.70; I² = 36%). Results assessing PFS were similar (P = 0.45, I² = 0%).ConclusionsThese clinical data suggest that prior nephrectomy does not affect the efficacy of ICI-based regimens in mRCC relative to sunitinib.     

Therapeutic effects of the combined androgen blockade therapy versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog monotherapy in patients with hormone naïve metastatic prostate cancer: a multi-institutional comparative analysis

BackgroundThe clinical benefit of the combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy over luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (LH-RHa) monotherapy for hormone naïve metastatic prostate cancer (mHNPC) is unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively compare the effectiveness of CAB with the LH-RHa monotherapy on the prognosis of Japanese patients with mHNPC.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the prognosis of 517 patients diagnosed with mHNPC between August 2001 and May 2017. The patients’ data were obtained from the Michinoku Urological Cancer Research Group database and Hirosaki University-related hospitals. Patients were divided into the CAB and LH-RHa monotherapy groups based on primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and castrate-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS) were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox hazard proportional analyses was performed to investigate the effect of primary ADT on oncological outcomes.ResultsThe median age was 73 years old. The numbers of patients in the CAB and LH-RHa monotherapy groups were 447 and 70, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed no significant differences in either 5-year OS (56.7% vs. 52.5%, P=0.277), CSS (61.1% vs. 56.4%, P=0.400), and CRPC-FS (33.1% vs. 31.1%, P=0.529) between the groups. IPTW-adjusted multivariate Cox hazard proportional analyses showed no significant differences in OS, CSS, and CRPC-FS between the two groups.ConclusionsNo significant differences in oncological outcomes were observed between the CAB and LH-RHa monotherapy groups in patients with mHNPC.     

Preoperative apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Objectives

We aimed to explore the prognostic value of preoperative apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (Apo B/A1) ratio in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors or Targeted Therapy: An Observational Study from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

BackgroundThe role of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between upfront CN and clinical outcomes in the setting of mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy.Design, setting, and participantsUsing the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, we retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with de novo mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regressions adjusting for known prognostic factors.Results and limitationsWe identified a total of 4639 eligible patients with mRCC. Among the 4202 patients treated with targeted therapy and 437 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2326 (55%) and 234 (54%) patients received upfront CN prior to treatment start. In multivariable analyses, CN was associated with significantly better OS in both the immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.90, p = 0.013) and the targeted therapy treatment (HR: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78, p < 0.001) group. There was no difference in OS benefit of CN between the immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy treatment groups (interaction p = 0.6). Limitations include selection of patients from large academic centers and the retrospective nature of the study.ConclusionsUpfront CN is associated with a significant OS benefit in selected patients treated by either immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy, and still has a role in selected patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Patient summaryBefore effective systemic therapies were available for metastatic kidney cancer, surgical removal of the primary (kidney) tumor was the mainstay of treatment. The role of removing the primary tumor has recently been called into question given that more effective systemic therapies have become available. In this study, we find that removal of the primary kidney tumor still has a benefit for selected patients treated with highly effective modern systemic therapies, including targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.     

Efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in older patients for first line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Backgroundimmunotherapy became the first line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Nevertheless, a better understanding of the specificities of targeted therapies (TT) in the elderly population could be helpful in order to improve the management of mRCC in this population. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess efficacy and safety of sunitinib and sorafenib used as first-line TT in 70 years older patients compared to younger patients.MethodsData were retrospectively collected for all consecutive mRCC patients receiving first line TT treatment by sunitinib or sorafenib for mRCC from January 2006 to November 2017. Patients were divided into two groups according to the age using a cut-off at 70 years old. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.ResultsIn total, 147 patients were included; 94 (63.9%) were <70 and 53 (36.1%) were 70 years old or more. First line TT used was sunitinib in 123 (83.7%) patients or sorafenib in 24 (16.3%) patients. Median PFS was 8 months for elderly patients vs. 6 in younger group (P=0.68). Median OS were 26 vs. 36 months (P=0.08). Severe induced toxicity was more frequent among elderly patients: 34 (64.2%) vs. 46 patients (48.9%) (P=0.07). Rate of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was 22 patients (23.4%) in younger group vs. 28 patients (52.8%) in the elderly group (P=0.0005). Results were similar in the 2 groups regarding the type of toxicities.ConclusionsOur results suggest similar efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents as first-line treatment for mRCC among younger and older patients with an age cut-off of 70 years. Safety results suggest that these drugs can be safely used for older patients with a need of caution regarding toxicity prevention.