Can quantitative analysis of multi-parametric MRI independently predict failure of focal salvage HIFU therapy in men with radio-recurrent prostate cancer?

ObjectivesFocal salvage HIFU is a feasible therapeutic option in some men who have recurrence after primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer. We aimed to determine if multi-parametric quantitative parameters, in addition to clinical factors, might have a role in independently predicting focal salvage HIFU outcomes.MethodsA retrospective registry analysis included 150 consecutive men who underwent focal salvage HIFU (Sonablate500) (2006-2015); 89 had mpMRI available. Metastatic disease was excluded by nodal assessment on pelvic MRI, a radioisotope bone-scan and/or choline or FDG PET/CT scan. All men had mpMRI and either transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy or targeted and systematic TRUS-biopsy. mpMRI included T2‐weighted, diffusion‐weighted and dynamic contrast‐enhancement. Pre-HIFU quantitative mpMRI data was obtained using Horos DICOM Viewer v3.3.5 for general MRI parameters and IB DCE v2.0 plug-in. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined by biochemical failure and/or positive localized or distant imaging results and/or positive biopsy and/or systemic therapy and/or metastases/prostate cancer‐specific death. Potential predictors of PFS were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox-regression.ResultsMedian age at focal salvage HIFU was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65–74.5) and median PSA pre-focal salvage treatment was 5.8ng/ml (3.8-8). Median follow-up was 35 months (23-47) and median time to failure was 15 months (7.8–24.3). D-Amico low, intermediate and high-risk disease was present in 1% (1/89), 40% (36/89) and 43% (38/89) prior to focal salvage HIFU (16% missing data). 56% (50/89) failed by the composite outcome. A total of 22 factors were evaluated on univariable and 8 factors on multivariable analysis. The following quantitative parameters were included: Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp, IS, rTTP and TTP. On univariable analysis, PSA, prostate volume at time of radiotherapy failure and Ve (median) value were predictors for failure. Ve represents extracellular fraction of the whole tissue volume. On multivariable analysis, only Ve (median) value remained as an independent predictor.ConclusionsOne pharmacokinetic quantitative parameter based on DCE sequences seems to independently predict failure following focal salvage HIFU for radio-recurrent prostate cancer. This likely relates to the tumor microenvironment producing heat-sinks which counter the heating effect of HIFU. Further validation in larger datasets and evaluating mechanisms to reduce heat-sinks are required.     

Evaluation of post-ablation mpMRI as a predictor of residual prostate cancer after focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSA testing in follow-up after high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.MethodsA total of 73 men with localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent focal HIFU followed by per-protocol PSA and mpMRI with systematic plus targeted biopsies at 12 months after treatment. We evaluated the association between post-treatment mpMRI and PSA with disease persistence on the post-ablation biopsy. We also assessed post-treatment functional and oncological outcomes.ResultsMedian age was 69 years (Interquartile Range (IQR): 66–74) and median PSA was 6.9 ng/dL (IQR: 5.3–9.9). Of 19 men with persistent GG ≥ 2 disease, 58% (11 men) had no visible lesions on MRI. In the 14 men with PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions, 7 (50%) had either no cancer or GG 1 cancer at biopsy. Men with false negative mpMRI findings had higher PSA density (0.16 vs. 0.07 ng/mL², P = 0.01). No change occurred in the mean Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) survey scores (17.0 at baseline vs. 17.7 post-treatment, P = 0.75) or International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (8.1 at baseline vs. 7.7 at 24 months, P = 0.81) after treatment.ConclusionsPersistent GG ≥ 2 cancer may occur after focal HIFU. mpMRI alone without confirmatory biopsy may be insufficient to rule out residual cancer, especially in patients with higher PSA density. Our study also validates previously published studies demonstrating preservation of urinary and sexual function after HIFU treatment.     

Unilateral lesion detected on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy is not an appropriate indication for focal therapy in prostate cancer

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate if preoperative assessments of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Magnetic resonance imaging /ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided prostate biopsy could be used to guide focal therapy for prostate cancer.Materials and MethodsA total of 101 prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative findings included mpMRI and MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy, while postoperative whole mount pathology was based on surgical specimen.ResultsOf the 101 patients preoperatively diagnosed with a unilateral tumor, postoperative whole mount pathology showed 73.27% were bilateral tumors, and 71.62% of bilateral lesions were clinically significant. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative findings, the correct rate of preoperative mpMRI on the lesion side (left or right) was only 20.79%. As for the Gleason score, the correct rate of preoperative MRI/US fusion-guided prostate pathology was 67.33%. Judging from postoperative whole mount pathology, 47.52% of patients had a unilateral clinically significant tumor, which is an indication for focal therapy.ConclusionPreoperative examinations of mpMRI and MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy cannot be used to guide focal therapy for prostate cancer.     

Papel de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica en la selección y el seguimiento de pacientes en vigilancia activa por cáncer de próstata. Revisión del grupo de Uro-Tecnología (ESUT) de la EAU

IntroductionIn recent years, active surveillance (AS) has gained popularity as a safe and reasonable option for patients with low-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer.ObjectiveTo summarize the latest information regarding the use of mpMRI in the setting of active surveillance (AS) for the management of prostate cancer (PCa).Evidence acquisitionA PubMed-based, English literature search was conducted through February 2020. We selected the most relevant original articles, meta-analyses and systematic reviews that could provide important information.Evidence synthesisThe great importance of mpMRI of the prostate in the setting of PCa diagnosis is its ability to visualize primarily high-grade cancerous lesions potentially missed on systematic biopsies. In several studies, mpMRI has shown an improved performance over clinically based models for identifying candidates which will benefit the most from AS. Although data on prostate mpMRI during follow-up of men under AS is sparse, it holds the probability to improve significantly AS programs by a more precise selection of optimal candidates, a more accurate identification of disease progression and a reduction in number of biopsies. The goal of reassessment of patients undergoing AS is to find the most effective moment to change attitude to active treatment.ConclusionThe value of mpMRI has been recognized due to its high negative predictive value (NPV) for lesion upgrading in low-risk PCa patients. The improvement in imaging detection, and precise diagnosis with mpMRI could reduce misclassifications at initial diagnosis and during follow-up, reducing the number of biopsies.     

Prospective multicentre study using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the focal treatment of prostate cancer: Safety outcomes and complications

PurposeTo investigate focal therapy using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (CaP), we analyzed the safety and complications of this procedure.MethodsPatients (pts) eligible for this multicenter prospective cohort study suffered from low to intermediate risk localized CaP with no prior treatment. After tumor identification on multiparametric MRI and in prostate biopsy, the lesions were treated with HIFU observing a safety margin of 8 to 10 mm. Adverse events (AE) after 30 and 90 days, as well as the required interventions were assessed and stratified for treatment localizations.ResultsOf the 98 men included in the study in two European centers, 35 (35.7%) experienced AEs in the first 30 days after HIFU intervention with Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ II: 15 pts (15.3%) had a postoperative urinary tract infection and 26 pts (26.5%) a urinary retention. Four pts (4.1%) underwent subsequent intervention (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa/b). The number of late postoperative complications occurring between 30 and 90 days after intervention was low (2.0%). The highest complication rate was associated with tumors located at the anterior base (50.0%). The inclusion of the urethra in the ablation zone led to AEs in 20 out of 41 cases (48.8%) and represented a significant risk factor for complications within 30 days (odds ratio = 2.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–5.96; P = 0.033).ConclusionsFocal therapy of CaP lesions with a robotic HIFU-probe is safe and renders an acceptable rate of minor early AEs. The inclusion of the urethra in the ablation zone leads to an increase in early complications and should be avoided whenever possible.     

How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large,single-institution series

ObjectiveWe aimed at optimizing the follow-up for patients with a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate (mpMRI) and a subsequent negative targeted biopsy (TBx) plus systematic biopsy (SBx).Materials and methodsA total of 308 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa and a positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) with concomitant negative systematic and targeted Bx performed at a single tertiary referral center. All patients were then followed with serial PSA measurements, digital rectal examination and eventual follow-up mpMRI and/or repeat Bx. The primary outcome was to evaluate the overall clinically significant PCa (csPCa)-free survival. The secondary outcome was to assess the role of a repeat mpMRI (Fu-mpMRI) and PSA density as predictors of csPCa diagnosis (defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) during follow-up. Kaplan Meier analysis and univariable Cox regression were used for survival and predictive analyses.ResultsMedian follow-up was 31 months (IQR: 23–43). During the study period 116 (37.7%) and 68 (22.1%) of men received a Fu-mpMRI and a Fu-Bx, respectively. Overall, 51 (16.6%) and 15 (4.9%) patients had a positive mpMRI and clinically significant (csPCa) diagnosis during follow-up, respectively. Among 68 men who received a Fu-Bx, the 2- and 3-years csPCa diagnosis-free survival in men with negative vs. positive Fu-mpMRI was 97% vs. 65% and 92% vs. 65%, respectively. At univariate Cox-regression analysis the presence of a positive Fu-mpMRI resulted to be significantly associated with the presence of csPCa at Fu-Bx (HR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.3–26.6, P = 0.008). The 2- and 3-years csPCa diagnosis-free survival in men with PSAd <0.15 vs. ≥0.15 was 89% vs. 77%, and 86% vs. 66%, respectively (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 0.75–8.87, P = 0.13). The combination of negative Fu-mpMRI and PSAd<0.15 furtherly reduced the probability of csPCa diagnosis at Fu-Bx at only 6% at 3years (HR: 9.9, 95% CI: 1.9–38.6, P < 0.001) in this subgroup of patients.ConclusionsAfter a negative TBx for a positive mpMRI, more than half of Fu-mpMRI were negative. A persistent positive mpMRI was associated with a significant risk of csPCa. The risk of csPCa diagnosis in men with negative mpMRI performed after negative TBx and low PSAd was negligible.     

PI-RADS score is associated with biochemical control and distant metastasis in men with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy

BackgroundNovel methods of risk stratification are needed for men with prostate cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) uses multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to assign a score indicating the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer. We evaluated pretreatment mpMRI findings, including PI-RADS score, as a marker for outcome in patients treated with primary radiation therapy (RT).MethodsOne hundred and twenty-three men, 64% and 36% of whom had National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate-risk and high-risk disease, respectively, underwent mpMRI prior to RT. PI-RADS score and size of the largest nodule were analyzed with respect to freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and freedom from distant metastasis.ResultsA PI-RADS score of ≤3, 4, or 5 was defined in 7%, 49%, and 44%; with a median nodule size of 0, 8, and 18 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 67 months. Men with PI-RADS ≤ 3, 4, or 5 disease had 7-year FFBF of 100%, 92%, and 65% (P = 0.002), and a 7-year freedom from distant metastasis of 100%, 100%, and 82%, respectively (P = 0.014). PI-RADS (Hazard Ratio 5.4 for PI-RADS 5 vs. 4, P = 0.006) remained associated with FFBF when controlling for NCCN risk category (P = 0.063) and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (P = 0.535). Nodule size was also associated with FFBF (Hazard Ratio 1.08 per mm, P < 0.001) after controlling for NCCN risk category (P = 0.156) and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (P = 0.776).ConclusionmpMRI findings, including PI-RADS score and nodule size, may improve risk stratification in men treated with primary RT     

Determining the diagnostic value of PSMA-PET/CT imaging in patients with persistent high prostate specific antigen levels and negative prostate biopsies

PurposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membranous antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to localize primary prostate cancer (PCa) in men with persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous prostate biopsies that were negative for PCa.MethodsIn this study, 34 men with persistently elevated PSA-levels, previous negative for PCa biopsies and who subsequently underwent diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Men were divided into 3 groups: 1. 12 men with a previous negative mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 1-2) 2. 17 men with a positive mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 3-5), but negative MRI-targeted biopsies and 3. Four men in whom mpMRI was contraindicated. If PSMA-avid lesions were seen, patients underwent 2-4 cognitive targeted biopsies in combination with systematic biopsies. The detection rate of PSMA-PET/CT for PCa, and the accuracy of (possible) targeted biopsies were calculated.ResultsIncluded men had a median PSA-level of 22.8 ng/mL (Interquartile Range 15.6–30.0) at the time of PSMA-PET/CT. Elevated PSMA-ligand uptake in the prostate suspicious for PCa was observed in 22/34 patients (64.7%). In 18/22 patients (54.5%), PSMA-targeted prostate biopsies were performed. In 3/18 patients (16.6%), the targeted biopsies showed International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score 1–2 PCa. The other men had inflammation or benign findings after histopathological examination of the biopsy cores.ConclusionIn this study, the clinical value of PSMA-PET/CT for patients with an elevated PSA-level, and negative for PCa biopsies was low. Only very few men were diagnosed with PCa, and no clinically significant PCa was found.     

Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

ObjectivesThe purpose of our study was to test our hypothesis that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may have a higher prognostic accuracy than the Partin tables in predicting organ-confined (OC) prostate cancer and extracapsular extension (ECE) after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods and materialsAfter institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed 60 patients who underwent 3-T mpMRI before RP. mpMRI was used to assess clinical stage and the updated version of the Partin tables was used to calculate the probability of each patient to harbor OC disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in detecting OC and ECE were calculated. Logistic regression models predicting OC pathology were created using either clinical stage at mpMRI or Partin tables probability. The area under the curve was used to calculate the predictive accuracy of each model.ResultsMedian prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis was 5 ng/ml (range: 4.1–6.7 ng/ml). Overall, 52 (86.7%) men had cT1 disease, 7 (11.7%) had cT2a/b, and 1 (1.6%) had cT3b at digital rectal examination. Biopsy Gleason score was 6, 3+4 = 7, 4+3 = 7, 8, and 9 to 10 in 28 (46.7%), 15 (25%), 3 (5%), 10 (16.7%), and 4 (6.6%) patients, respectively. At mpMRI, clinical stage was defined as cT2a/b, cT2c, cT3a, and cT3b in 11 (18.3%), 23 (38.3%), 21 (35%), and 5 (8.4%) patients, respectively. At final pathology, 38 men (63.3%) had OC disease, whereas 18 (30%) had ECE and 4 (6.7%) had seminal vesicle invasion.The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mpMRI in detecting OC disease were 81.6%, 86.4%, 91.2%, and 73.1%, respectively, whereas in detecting ECE were 77.8%, 83.4%, 66.7%, and 89.7%, respectively. At logistic regression, both the Partin tables–derived probability and the mpMRI clinical staging were significantly associated with OC disease (all P<0.01). The area under the curves of the model built using the Partin tables and that of the mpMRI model were 0.62 and 0.82, respectively (P = 0.04).ConclusionsThe predictive accuracy of mpMRI in predicting OC disease on pathological analysis is significantly greater than that of the Partin tables. mpMRI had a high PPV (91.2%) when predicting OC disease and a high NPV (89.7%) with regard to ECE. mpMRI should be considered when planning prostate cancer treatment in addition to readily available clinical parameters.     

The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy

ObjectivesTo evaluate the utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate (IB) in patients with visible lesion/s and previous negative software-based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-targeted biopsy of the prostate (FTB).Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analysed prospectively maintained database including consecutive men undergoing IB from March 2013 to October 2017 in 2 European centres expert in this procedure. We selected men with the following criteria: No previous treatment for prostate cancer (CaP), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) lesion(s) PIRADS score ≥ 3, FTB showing no clinically significant cancer (csCaP), and subsequent IB. Patient's characteristics, mpMRI findings, biopsy technique, and histopathological results were extracted. The primary outcome was to determine the detection rate of csCaP, defined as any Gleason pattern ≥ 4. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of positive findings at IB.ResultsFifty-three men were included. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64–68), median Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) was 7.6 ng/ml (IQR 5.2–10.9), and median prostate volume was 59 ml (IQR 44–84). Fifty-six lesions with PIRADS score 3 in 9 cases (16%), 4 in 30 cases (54%), and 5 in 17 cases (30%) were detected. FTB was performed in all cases using a transrectal approach with 3 different platforms (Toshiba, Koelis, and Artemis). Median time between FTB and IB was 3 months (IQR 1–7). A median of 2 cores per lesion were collected with IB (IQR 2–3). No cancer, clinically insignificant and clinically significant cancer were found in 33 (59%), 9 (16%), and 14 (25%) targeted lesions, respectively. Median maximum cancer core length and maximum positive percentage were 9 mm (3–13) and 55% (21%–80%). The only predictor of csCaP on IB was prostate volume (P = 0.026) with an ideal cut-off at 70 ml.ConclusionOne in 4 patients with previous negative FTB, IB was able to detect csCaP. According to this study, IB would be of particularly useful in patients with large glands.     

Outcomes of partial gland ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer

BackgroundTo evaluate the clinical and oncological outcomes of partial gland ablation (PGA) using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) technique for the clinically unilateral prostate cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis for the 163 patients who treated by PGA for clinically unilateral prostate cancer. The PGA was performed using Focal one system with concurrent trans-urethral prostatectomy. The oncological and functional outcomes were evaluated as well as risk factors for remnant disease after PGA. Clinically significant cancer was defined as grade group ≥2.ResultsAmong the entire subjects, grade group 2 or greater was present at pre-treatment biopsy in 76.7%. Median follow-up time was 17 months and 60.1% of total subjects had follow-up biopsy at postoperative 1 year. There were 25 subjects (24.2%) with any cancer and 13 subjects (12.6%) with CS cancer at the follow-up biopsy. The preoperative age and number of positive cores at preoperative biopsy were significantly associated with positive results at follow-up biopsy. Incontinence which requires 2 or more pads per day was observed at 4 subjects (2.5%) postoperatively. There were no subjects who needed intensive care or experienced rectal complications.ConclusionThe PGA with HIFU was safe and showed good preservation of functional outcomes as well as satisfactory oncological control. The remnant disease was observed in the 24.5% of patients who underwent follow-up biopsy in the present study. Thus, further prospective study is needed to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes of PGA with HIFU more accurately.     

Do patients who undergo multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer benefit from additional staging imaging? Results from a statewide collaborative

ObjectivesProstate cancer (CaP) staging traditionally includes computed tomography (CT) and technetium-99m bone scintigraphy (BS) for assessment of lymph node (LN) and bone metastases, respectively. In recent years, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been used in diagnostic assessment of CaP. We sought to compare the accuracy of mpMRI to CT and BS for pretreatment staging.Materials and methodsUsing the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative registry, we identified men undergoing pretreatment mpMRI in addition to CT and/or BS in 2012 to 2018. Imaging reports were classified as positive, negative, or equivocal for detection of LN and bone metastases. A best value comparator (BVC) was used to adjudicate metastatic status in the absence of pathologic data. mpMRI accuracy was calculated using pessimistic (equivocal=positive) and optimistic (equivocal = negative) interpretations. We compared the diagnostic performance of mpMRI, CT, and BS in detecting metastases.ResultsIn total, 364 men underwent CT and mpMRI, and 646 underwent BS and mpMRI. Based on the BVC, 52 men (14%) harbored LN metastases and 38 (5.9%) harbored bone metastases. Sensitivity of mpMRI for LN metastases was significantly higher than CT (65–73% vs 38%, P < 0.005), and specificity of mpMRI and CT were 97% to 99% and 99% (P = 0.2–0.4), respectively. For bone metastases, BS sensitivity was 68% as compared to 42% to 71% (P = 0.02–0.83) for mpMRI. Specificity for bone metastases was 95% to 99% across all modalities.ConclusionsUsing statewide data, mpMRI appears superior to CT and comparable to BS for detection of LN and bone metastases, respectively. Pretreatment mpMRI may obviate the need for additional staging imaging.     

The effect of delaying transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate for patients with suspicious MRI findings—Implications for the COVID-19 era

ObjectiveImage guided biopsies are an integral part of prostate cancer evaluation. The effect of delaying biopsies of suspicious prostate mpMRI lesions is uncertain and clinically relevant during the COVID-19 crisis.We evaluated the association between biopsy delay time and pathologic findings on subsequent prostate biopsy.Materials and methodsAfter obtaining IRB approval we reviewed the medical records of 214 patients who underwent image-guided transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate biopsy between 2017 and 2019.Study outcomes included clinically significant (ISUP grade group ≥2) and any prostate cancer on biopsy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between biopsy delay time and outcomes while adjusting for known predictors of cancer on biopsy.ResultsThe study cohort included 195 men with a median age of 68. Median delay between mpMRI and biopsy was 5 months, and 90% of patients had a ≤8 months delay. A significant association was found between PI-RADS 5 lesions and no previous biopsies and shorter delay time.Delay time was not associated with clinically significant or any cancer on biopsy. A higher risk of significant cancer was associated with older age (P = 0.008), higher PSA (0.003), smaller prostate volume (<0.001), no previous biopsy (0.012) and PI-RADS 5 lesions (0.015).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that under current practice, where men with PI-RADS 5 lesions and no previous biopsies undergo earlier evaluation, a delay of up to 8 months between imaging and biopsy does not affect biopsy findings.In the current COVID-19 crisis, selectively delaying image-guided prostate biopsies is unlikely to result in a higher rate of significant cancer.     

高强度聚焦超声消融局限型子宫腺肌症

目的探讨高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗局限型子宫腺肌症的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经HIFU消融治疗的60例局限型子宫腺肌症患者,观察其治疗前及治疗后1、3、6个月的影像学表现、子宫肌瘤症状严重程度及健康相关生活质量调查问卷评分情况。结果 HIFU治疗后3天内复查MRI提示平均消融率为(70.30±12.27)%。不同部位治疗前及治疗后1、3、6个月的症状严重程度评分和健康相关生活质量评分总体差异均有统计学意义(P均0.05)。局限性子宫腺肌症病灶不同时间点的体积差异均有统计学意义(P均0.05)。未见严重并发症发生。结论 HIFU治疗局限型子宫腺肌症无创、安全、有效。     

Value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of invasive urinary bladder tumours.

BackgroundInitial tumour staging in bladder cancer mainly relies on the histo-pathological outcome of the transurethral bladder tumour resection (TURBT) and imaging by means of a CT-scan (CT-intravenous urography; CT-IVU). The reported risk of understaging varies from 24-50%. To further improve the the evaluation of depth of invasion of the bladder tumour the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful. To substantiate the additional value of this imaging modality the present observational study was designed.Study designThis is a prospective observational study to analyse bladder tumour staging with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in patients with a known bladder tumour, who are planned for radical cystectomy.Study populationPatients with an invasive bladder cancer who are planned for radical cystectomy.InterventionPatients were accrued during their visit to the outpatient department of urology. They underwent routine cystoscopy, laboratory tests (including serum Creatinin) and CT-IVU investigations and subsequently a mpMRI.Main study parameters/endpointsTo demonstrate the value of mpMRI in the initial staging of bladder tumours using radiological bladder tumour stage (T-stage) based on mpMRI and pathological bladder tumour stage based on ‘whole-mount’ histo-pathology after radical cystectomy.ResultsThirty-seven participants with known bladder tumours underwent mpMRI and subsequent cystectomy. After mpMRI 10 participants were diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 27 participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In the ‘whole-mount’ pathology results 12 participants had NMIBC and 25 participants had MIBC. We found a sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 en 0.58 respectively, for the evaluation of MIBC. The positive and negative predictive value were 81% and 70% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI to differentiate between NMIBC and MIBC was 78%.ConclusionsWe found a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 58% for mpMRI to discriminate NMIBC from MIBC.     

不同T2WI信号子宫肌瘤超声造影分析

目的对行高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗的不同T2信号的子宫肌瘤行CEUS定量分析及动态血管模型(DVP)参数成像。方法对16例行HIFU治疗的单发子宫肌瘤患者,依据术前MRI T2WI信号不同分为高信号组(n=6)、等信号组(n=4)、低信号组(n=6),于HIFU治疗前行CEUS并利用SonoLiver CAP软件对其行定量分析,以子宫肌瘤与周围肌层增强水平差值为参数行DVP参数成像构建。结果 3组峰值强度、上升时间、达峰时间、平均渡越时间分别为:高信号组为(235.40±35.46)%、(22.80±3.16)s、(25.09±2.44)s、(125.78±27.63)s,等信号组为(71.97±2.43)%、(24.85±3.22)s、(32.81±3.92)s、(66.52±3.48)s,低信号组为(16.17±2.83)%、(25.42±2.66)s、(32.82±3.76)s、(64.27±3.33)s,3组间各参数比较差异均有统计学意义(P均0.05)。高信号、低信号组子宫肌瘤的DVP曲线主要表现为未消退型和负向型。结论 CEUS参数成像分析和DVP参数图可直观、动态、定量地反映不同T2信号子宫肌瘤的血流灌注差异,为HIFU治疗子宫肌瘤提供重要信息。     

Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort

BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) is the preferred management option for most men with grade group (GG) 1 prostate cancer (PCa). Questions persist regarding long-term outcomes and the optimal approach to AS.ObjectiveTo determine survival and metastatic outcomes in AS patients. Secondary objectives were to measure the cumulative incidence and association of patient-level factors on biopsy grade reclassification.Design, setting, and participantsA prospective, active, open-enrollment cohort study was conducted from 1995 through July 2018 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Patients with very-low-risk or low-risk PCa were enrolled.InterventionAS with semiannual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination, serial prostate biopsy, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe 10- and 15-yr cumulative incidences of primary and secondary outcomes were determined.Results and limitationsOverall, 1818 men were monitored on AS for a median of 5.0 yr (interquartile range 2.0–9.0). There were 88 non-PCa deaths, four PCa deaths, and one additional case of metastasis. The cumulative incidence of PCa-specific mortality or metastasis was 0.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.6%) at both 10 and 15 yr. The 5-, 10-, and 15-yr cumulative incidences of biopsy grade reclassification were 21%, 30%, and 32%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, biopsy grade reclassification was associated with older age, African-American race, PSA density, and increased cancer volume on biopsy, and men who underwent mpMRI prior to enrollment were less likely to undergo grade reclassification. Our selection and monitoring are more stringent than many other contemporary AS programs.ConclusionsIn a large, single-institution, prospective AS cohort, the risk of cancer death or metastasis was <1% over long-term follow-up. Consistent with clinical guidelines, these data support the use of AS for the management of most men diagnosed with GG1 PCa.Patient summaryThis study investigated long-term outcomes in patients with grade group 1 prostate cancer managed with active surveillance (AS). Ten years after enrolling in AS, the risk of metastasis or death from prostate cancer was <1%, while 48% of men switched to treatment. Patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/ultrasound-fusion targeted biopsy prior to enrollment were less likely to experience biopsy grade reclassification during follow-up, suggesting a role for mpMRI as part of a comprehensive risk assessment to confirm AS eligibility. These findings support the safety of AS in most men with grade group 1 prostate cancer, but specific outcomes may differ in programs with less intensive monitoring.     

Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?

PurposeTo assess predictors of clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) in men who had a non-malignant Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy and persistent Prostate Imaging-Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) 3 to 5 lesions in subsequent mpMRI.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed MRI-targeted biopsy database in three centers. Inclusion criteria: persistence of at least one PI-RADS ≥3 lesion found negative for cancer in a previous MRI-targeted plus systemic biopsy (baseline biopsy). Exclusion criteria: downgrading to PI-RADS 1-2. A logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the predictors of csPCa.ResultsFifty-seven patients were included. Median interval between biopsies was 12.9(2.43) months. Median age was 68.0(12) years. Median PSA was 7.0(5.45) ng/ml. At follow-up, 24.6%, 54.4%, and 21% of patients had a PI-RADS score 3, 4, and 5 index lesion (IL), respectively. At re-biopsy, 28/57(49.1%) men were found to harbor PCa. Among these, 22(78.6%) had csPCa. csPCa was found outside the IL in only 2 patients. Eleven, 13, and 5 patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively, had no cancer. Three patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion had cancer (2 with Gleason score 3+3, 1 with Gleason score 3+4). 14/43 men with a PI-RADS 4/5 lesion harbored Gleason score ≥3+4 PCa. Logistic regression analysis found that PSA (HR 1.281, 95% CI: 1.013–1.619, P = 0.039) and IL size (HR 1.146, 95% CI: 1.018–1.268, P = 0.041) were the predictors of csPCa at re-biopsy.ConclusionsPatients with non-malignant pathology from PI-RADS ≥3 lesions targeted biopsy should be follow-up with mpMRI, and those with persistent PI-RADS 4 to 5 lesions should repeat MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy.     

The additive value of mpMRI on prostate cancer detection: Comparison between patients with and without a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE)

PurposeDiagnosis of prostate cancer (CaP) is based on digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level. This approach lacks sensitivity and specificity and is associated with many negative biopsies, high rate of diagnosing clinically insignificant disease and lacks accuracy to predict clinically significant (CS) cancer. The addition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) before prostate biopsy reduces the detection of low-grade tumors while improving the detection of CS CaP. Most studies that evaluated mpMRI performance did not separate the DRE status of the examined patients. Therefore, the aim of our study is to investigate whether mpMRI provides similar advantages in detection of CaP according to the DRE findings.Materials and MethodsThis prospective study included patients with clinically suspected CaP that were referred to MRI-fusion biopsy from 2014 to 2019. All patients had mpMRI of the prostate with an index lesion of PIRADS ≥3. Analysis was done comparing systemic and targeted biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the DRE findings (positive or negative DRE) and the primary outcomes were compared between the 2 study groups: detection rate of CaP and the detection rate of CS disease defined as Gleason score ≥ 7.ResultsThe final study cohort included 86 patients: 47 with negative DRE and 39 with positive DRE. Overall cancer detection rate was higher in patients with a positive DRE (70.3% vs 48.9%, P <0.05). In the region of interest a higher overall detection rate and of CS disease was found in those with abnormal DRE (51.3% vs. 40.4% and 48.6% vs. 34.0% respectively). The systematic biopsy analysis showed an overall lower detection rate in the negative DRE group (8.5% vs. 18.9 %). The targeted biopsies detected more cancer and significant tumors per core in patients with positive DRE (29.2% vs. 18.5% and 22.1% vs. 14.5% respectively).ConclusionsPatients submitted to fusion biopsy and have a positive DRE are diagnosed more often with CaP, have higher grade disease and larger tumors. In patients suspicious for CaP and having a significant lesion on mpMRI one should combine targeted and systematic biopsy regardless of the DRE status.