Impact of Donor Source on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mature T Cell and Natural Killer Cell Neoplasms in the Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the key strategy to cure patients with mature T and natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas/leukemia, especially those with relapsed/refractory diseases, there is no consensus strategy for donor selection. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of allo-HSCT in 111 patients in 15 Japanese institutions as a multi-institutional joint research project. Thirty-nine patients received bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from related donors (rBMT/rPBSCT), 37 received BMT/PBSCT from unrelated donors (uBMT/uPBSCT), and 35 received cord blood transplantation (CBT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 years were 42% and 34%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 43% and 25%. In multivariate analysis, CBT showed comparable OS with rBMT/rPBSCT (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; P = .264) and better OS compared with uBMT/uPBSCT (HR, 2.99; P = .010), with a trend toward a lower relapse rate (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.60; P = .010; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.05; P = .082). This superiority of CBT was more definite in on-disease patients (OS: rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 5.52; P = .021; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 6.80; P = .007). Better disease control was also strongly associated with better OS and PFS with lower relapse rate. In conclusion, allo-HSCT is beneficial for the survival of patients with mature T and NK cell lymphomas/leukemia if performed in a timely fashion. Since CBT showed favorable survival with a lower relapse risk, it could be a preferred alternative, especially in on-disease patients.     

Higher Total Body Irradiation Dose Intensity in Fludarabine/TBI-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen Is Associated with Inferior Survival in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation

Disease relapse is the most common cause of therapy failure in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). It is not known whether or not increasing total body irradiation (TBI) dose from 2 to 4 Gy in a RIC platform can provide improved disease control without increasing nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated the outcomes of patients with NHL receiving RIC allo-HCT with either fludarabine (Flu)/2-Gy TBI versus Flu/4-Gy TBI. In the CIBMTR registry, 413 adult patients with NHL underwent a first allo-HCT using either a matched related or unrelated donor between 2008 and 2017, using a RIC regimen with either Flu/2-Gy TBI (n = 349) or Flu/4-Gy TBI (n = 64). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), NRM, relapse/progression, and progression-free survival (PFS). At baseline, the Flu/2-Gy TBI cohort had significantly fewer patients with Karnofsky performance status ≥90 and significantly more patients had a higher HCT-comorbidity index. On multivariate analysis, the 2 conditioning cohorts were not significantly different in terms of risk of grade 3 to 4 aGVHD or cGVHD. Compared to Flu/2-Gy TBI, the Flu/4-Gy TBI conditioning was associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.89; P = .02) and inferior OS (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.23, P = .03). No significant differences were seen in the risk of relapse/progression (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.29, P = .33) or PFS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.54, P = .61) between the 2 regimens. Comparing Flu/2-Gy TBI versus Flu/4-Gy TBI cohorts, the 5-year adjusted outcomes were NRM (28% versus 47%; P = .005), relapse/progression (35% versus 29%; P = .28), PFS (37% versus 24%; P = .03), and OS (51% versus 31%; P = .001), respectively. Relapse was the most common cause of death in both cohorts. In patients with NHL undergoing Flu/TB I-based conditioning, augmenting TBI dose from 2 to 4 Gy is associated with higher NRM and inferior OS, without any significant benefit in terms of disease control. The optimal dose is 2-Gy in the RIC Flu/TBI platform for lymphomas.     

Effect of Smoking on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis

Pulmonary complications are fatal adverse events after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). On the other hand, smoking is a well-known risk factor for various pulmonary diseases and also increases the incidence of pulmonary complications and overall mortality in allo-HCT recipients. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the impact of smoking intensity on survival outcomes. This study included consecutive allo-HCT recipients at our center between June 2007 and May 2019 whose smoking profiles were available (n = 408); they were divided into high (pack-years >10, n = 171) and low (pack-years ≤10, n = 231) pack-years groups. In univariate analyses, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were significantly inferior in the high pack-years group (1-year NRM 26.6% versus 13.9%, P < .001; 1-year OS 58.4% versus 70.1%, P = .0067). However, this association was not observed in multivariate analyses. In subgroup analyses according to sex, the survival outcomes in the high pack-years group were significantly inferior in males (NRM hazard ratio [HR], 2.24 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 4.07], P = .0082; OS HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.04 to 2.28], P = .031), but not in females (NRM HR, 0.587 [95% CI, 0.241 to 1.43], P = .24; OS HR, 0.689 [95% CI, 0.400 to 1.19], P = .18). In summary, high pack-years were associated with inferior survival of allo-HCT recipients, especially in males.     

Impact of Anti-CMV IgG Titers and CD34 Count Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Alternative Donors on CMV reactivation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the main infectious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, we explored the role of anti-CMV antibody titers in HSCT from alternative donors and to compare the risk of CMV reactivation between posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical HSCT and antithymocyte globulin-based unrelated donor (URD) HSCT. We included 98 CMV-positive patients, 30 undergoing haploidentical HSCT and 68 undergoing URD HSCT. The majority of patients had a malignant disease (84%), received a myeloablative conditioning regimen (78%), and received a bone marrow graft (90%). The median pretransplantation anti-CMV IgG level was 109 U/mL. With median follow-up of 2.2 years, a total of 72 CMV reactivations occurred in 50 patients. There was no difference in CMV reactivation pattern between haploidentical HSCT recipients and URD HSCT recipients. In multivariable analysis until the first event, the incidence of CMV reactivation was higher in patients with anti-CMV IgG levels >100 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; P = .005) and in patients diagnosed with grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR, 10.8; P = .003) after day +50 and lower in patients who received higher doses of CD34 cells (HR, .44; P = .006). In multivariable analysis for recurring events, the incidence of CMV reactivation was higher in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (HR, 1.69: P = .04) and in patients with acute GVHD (HR, 1.88; P = .02), and lower in those who received higher doses of CD34 cells (HR, .55; P = .01). In summary, we have shown that pretransplantation anti-CMV IgG titers are correlated with CMV reactivation risk. More studies are needed to assess how this information can be incorporated in HSCT. The use of high-dose cellular grafts, a modifiable risk factor, also protects against CMV reactivation.     

Impact of Cytomegalovirus Replication and Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on the Outcome of Patients with B Cell Lymphoma after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was historically associated with increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM). More recently, different groups have reported an association between CMV replication and reduced risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse. Given the conflicting results, we evaluated the impact of CMV replication and other covariates on the outcome of a retrospective cohort of 265 adults with B cell lymphoma receiving allogeneic HSCT from HLA-identical siblings or alternative donors. In time-dependent multivariate analysis, CMV replication, evaluated by pp65 antigenemia, had no independent effect on the risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .6 to 1.6; P = .9), although it was associated with a reduced overall survival (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.2; P = .001) and an increased NRM (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.3; P = .01). Consistently, donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity were not associated with a different outcome relative to CMV double-negative serostatus. In multivariate models, a diagnosis of follicular lymphoma (P < .0001) and pretransplantation complete remission status (P < .0001) were the main independent predictors for improved relapse-free survival. In summary, contrary to what is observed in patients with AML, this report identifies no independent role for CMV replication or serostatus on the relapse of patients with B cell lymphomas undergoing allogeneic HSCT.     

Comparative Study of Mizoribine and Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined with a Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Patients with Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remain the major causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients following alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Mizoribine (MZR) showed an anti-CMV effect in addition to its immunosuppressive effect in patients with renal transplantation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MZR combined with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as a method of prophylactic immunosuppression in recipients following alternative donor HCT. Eighty patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to the MZR (n = 40) or MMF (n = 40) cohort before transplantation conditioning. Analyses involved a comparison of the outcomes between the 2 cohorts, as well as risk analyses of early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and severe CMV infection. In contrast to MMF, MZR was associated with a lower but statistically nonsignificant median CMV DNA peak load (P = .075), significantly fewer episodes of persistent/refractory infection (odds ratio [OR], .12), and a lower failure rate of CMV treatment (OR, .82), but a significantly higher rate of hyperuricemia (OR, 2.75). Transplantation efficacy was comparable in the 2 cohorts regarding engraftment, the development of secondary poor graft function and GVHD, and the estimated OS and PFS. The 1-year NRM of the MZR cohort did not differ from that of the MMF cohort, whereas the rate of 1-year NRM caused by viral infections was reduced in the MZR cohort and was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). In the multivariate analysis, lower doses of CD34⁺ cells in grafts (hazard ratio [HR], 3.65) and persistent/refractory CMV infections (versus no CMV infection: HR, 7.31; versus CMV infection that was not persistent/refractory: HR, 4.46) were predictors of increased 1-year NRM. The use of MMF (versus MZR cohort: OR, 11.54) and grade II-IV acute GVHD (OR, 15.32) were independent risk factors for developing persistent/refractory CMV infection. When combined with CNIs, MZR functioned well in terms of both immunosuppression and reduced severity of CMV infection; however, further studies are warranted to verify its use as a potential immunosuppressant for alternative donor HCT.     

The Dilemma of Conditioning Intensity: When Does Myeloablative Conditioning Improve Outcomes for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups has not been evaluated. We retrospectively analyzed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients in 2 groups based on DRI, to assess the impact of conditioning intensity on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).A total of 380 patients with either high/very high (n?=?148) or low/intermediate DRI (n?=?232) myeloid malignancy (AML, n = 278; MDS, n?=?102) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for survivors was 35 months. Median age was 58years (range, 18 to 75). Patient and transplant-related characteristics were 41% reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), 59% myeloablative conditioning (MAC), 13% bone marrow graft, 29% matched related donor, 49% matched unrelated donor, 22% haploidentical donor, and 52% HCT-specific comorbidity index ≥ 3. Among patients with high/very high DRI, there was no difference in OS, DFS, relapse, and NRM between RIC and MAC conditioning groups. For low/intermediate risk DRI recipients of MAC had better 3-year OS estimate (69% versus 57%, P?=?.001), DFS (65% versus 51%, P?=?.003), and lower relapse (3-year cumulative incidence, 17% versus 32%; P?=?.01) but similar NRM (19% versus 17%, P?=?.04) to RIC recipients. On multivariable analysis MAC was associated with better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], .58; 95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.88; P?=?.01), lower relapse (HR, .56; 95% CI, .32 to .97; P?=?.038), and similar NRM (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .54 to 2.26; P?=?.781) compared with RIC in the low/intermediate DRI group. Intensity had no impact on HCT outcomes in the high/very high DRI group.MAC improves DFS and relapse compared with RIC among AML/MDS patients with low/intermediate DRI. The finding of no such benefit in high/very high DRI needs to be further explored in a larger cohort with a longer follow-up.     

Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms-Unclassifiable: A Retrospective Nationwide Study of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

To date, there are no data focusing on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with MDS/MPN-U after allo-HSCT using Japanese nationwide registry data. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We evaluated the prognostic factors for 3-year OS by univariate analysis using the log-rank test. In our cohort of 86 patients with MDS/MPN-U, we found a 3-year OS of 48.5%, cumulative incidence of relapse of 23.7%, and NRM of 26.3%. The 3-year OS was significantly worse in patients age ≥50 years compared with those age <50 years (38.1% versus 65.0%; P = .049) and in patients with disease progression compared with those without disease progression (28.4% versus 57.2%; P = .042). Our results suggest that allo-HSCT may offer a curative option for patients with MDS/MPN-U, and that age and disease status could be important indicators in helping clinicians determine treatment options for these patients.     

FLAMSA-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning versus Myeloablative Conditioning in Younger Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Active Disease at the Time of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

The use of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in the setting of active relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been hindered by high historical rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM). FLAMSA (fludarabine, Ara-C, and amsacrine) chemotherapy (CT) followed by reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been proposed as an effective and potentially safer alternative in this scenario. As improvements in supportive care have contributed to decreasing NRM rates after MAC, a comparative reassessment of these two strategies was performed. This was a registry-based analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Eligibility criteria included age 18 to 50 years, primary refractory, first or second relapsed active AML, first allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or an unrelated donor (UD) performed between 2005 and 2018, MAC or FLAMSA-RIC. A total of 1018 patients were included. The median patient age was 39 years (range, 18 to 50). Two hundred and fifty-eight patients received busulfan (Bu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy), 314 received Cy/total body irradiation (TBI), 318 received FLAMSA-TBI, and 128 received FLAMSA-CT. The median duration of follow-up was 50 months. In univariate analysis, the 2-year relapse incidence (RI) (54%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 50%-57%), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (30%; 95% CI, 27%-33%), and refined graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (21%; 95% CI, 18%-24%) were not significantly different between cohorts. Lower 2-year NRM was observed in the FLAMSA-CT group (7% versus 16% in Bu/Cy, 19% in Cy/TBI, and 18% in FLAMSA-TBI; P = .04), as well as increased 2-year overall survival (OS) (50% versus 33% in Bu/Cy, 34% in Cy/TBI, and 36% in FLAMSA-TBI; P = .03). These results were maintained in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] for NRM: .40, P = .01; HR for OS: .65, P = .01; Bu/Cy as reference). These data suggest that FLAMSA-CT may be a preferred conditioning regimen in patients with active R/R AML due to lower NRM. Yet, the high relapse rates observed in our analyses emphasize the need for novel therapeutic strategies in this clinical setting.     

Outcome of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation by Donor Graft CD3+/Tregs Ratio: A Single-Center Experience

The therapeutic efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for hematological malignancies relies largely on the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects exerted by the donor CD3 cells, but there is a risk of onset of uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25^high Foxp3+) are believed to maintain tolerance and to inhibit acute GVHD (aGVHD) after allogeneic PBSCT. Nevertheless, when looking at post-allotransplantation patient outcomes, although the impact of aGVHD on survival is amply documented, so far there is no evidence that the donor graft CD3/Tregs ratio may affect overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse rates. Our aim was to study the possible impact of the gCD3/Tregs ratio on survival after myeloablative allogeneic PBSCT. We analyzed 74 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (n = 62), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 10), and chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 2) who underwent transplantation with unmanipulated PBSCs from a human leukocyte antigen–identical related donor (n = 48) or a human leukocyte antigen–identical unrelated donor (n = 26). Patients were subdivided into a high gCD3/Tregs ratio (≥36) group (HR group, n = 30) and a low gCD3/Tregs ratio (<36) group (LR group, n = 44). The OS, DFS, NRM, and relapse rates at 3 years were 53%, 51%, 29%, and 34%, respectively. Comparing the LR and HR groups, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the 3-year OS, DFS, and NRM rates (65% vs 31%, P = .0001; 67 versus 26%, P = .0001; 5% versus 71%, P < .0001, respectively) but not for relapse (30% vs 25%, P = ns). By multivariate analysis, LR significantly predicted better OS (P = .019), DFS (P = .003), and NRM (P = .05), whereas there was no statistically significant association between LR and relapse (P = .155). Overall, our data may suggest that LR preserves GVL effects but is also protective against aGVHD in allotransplantation patients.     

R-BEAM versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is considered in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with chemorefractory disease or who have relapsed after autologous SCT. Here we present the first report of alloSCT using the R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning regimen in DLBCL patients.We retrospectively compared long-term alloSCT outcomes of DLBCL patients who received either R-BEAM (n = 47) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 23).Seventy patients (median age, 53 years) with DLBCL received alloSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. The median number of pretransplant therapies was 3, and 17 patients (24%) received prior autologous SCT. All received rituximab as a frontline or salvage therapy before alloSCT. The donor was unrelated in 42 patients (60%), and peripheral blood stem cells were commonly used (96%). The 6-month cumulative incidence of grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 36.2% and 8.7% for R-BEAM and RIC, respectively (P = .03). Median follow-up of surviving patients after R-BEAM and RIC was 3.1 and 5.5 years, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) after R-BEAM and RIC was 34.4% and 43.4%, respectively (P = .48). At 3 years, R-BEAM was associated with a similar relapse rate (25.5% versus 26.1%, P = .96), nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 39.7% versus 39.1%, P = .98), and relapse-free survival (RFS; 34.8% versus 34.7%, P = .75) compared with RIC. In multivariable analysis lower Karnofsky performance score was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio, .96; P = .05), whereas chemorefractory disease was associated with a higher relapse risk (hazard ratio, 8.8; P = .04). No difference in OS, relapse, NRM, or RFS was noticed between R-BEAM and RIC. R-BEAM regimen seems to be feasible and results in equivalent rates of long-term OS, relapse, NRM, and RFS compared with RIC. However, a significantly higher rate of severe acute GVHD was noticed.     

Tandem Autologous-Autologous versus Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-Up Results from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0102 Trial

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) may improve long-term multiple myeloma (MM) control through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0102 trial was a biologic assignment trial comparing tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto) versus autologous followed by reduced-intensity allogeneic (auto-allo) transplant in patients with newly diagnosed MM with standard-risk (n = 625) or high-risk (n = 85; β₂-microglobulin at diagnosis ≥ 4 mg/dL or deletion of chromosome 13 by conventional karyotyping) disease. Although the initial 3-year analysis showed no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between arms in either risk group, we hypothesized that long-term follow-up may better capture the impact of the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Median follow-up of survivors was over 10 years. Among standard-risk patients there was no difference in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], .93 to 1.35; P = .25) or OS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, .82 to 1.28; P = .82). The 6-year PFS was 25% in the auto-auto arm versus 22% in the auto-allo arm (P = .32), and 6-year overall survival (OS) was 60% and 59%, respectively (P = .85). In the high-risk group, although there was no statistically significant difference in PFS (HR, .66; 95% CI, .41 to 1.07; P = .07) and OS (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, .60 to 1.71; P = .96), a reduction in 6-year risk of relapse of 77% versus 47% (P = .005) was reflected in better PFS of 13% versus 31% (P = .05) but similar OS, at 47% versus 51% (P = .69). Allogeneic HCT can lead to long-term disease control in patients with high-risk MM and needs to be explored in the context of modern therapy.     

Validation of the Revised Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality Score in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Despite recent advances, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) continues to be accompanied by a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Several scores have been developed to predict outcome after allo-HSCT. The recently revised Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score is based on patient age, donor type, disease risk, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of patient and donor, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁). The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive power of the PAM score in an independent large cohort of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We selected adult patients with AML who underwent a first allo-HSCT at the University Hospital of Dresden, a tertiary care hospital with a large transplantation program. All adult patients treated between January 1, 2003, and July 1, 2015, were included. The PAM score was calculated as described previously. Overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allo-HSCT were analyzed. Age, AML type, sex match, CMV match, donor type, European Leukemia Net risk classification, type of conditioning, disease stage, and PAM score as a continuous variable were selected a priori for multivariate Cox regression analyses. A total of 544 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median patient age was 57 years. With a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 1 to 161 months), the estimated OS for the whole cohort at 4 years was 43%, with a CIR of 30% and an NRM of 31%. The probability of OS at 4 years was 65% for patients with a PAM score of 0, 52% in those with a PAM score of 1, 33% in those with a PAM score of 2, and 22% in those with a PAM score of 3 (P?<?.001, log-rank test). Both the CIR and NRM increased with higher PAM scores (P?=?.005 and P?<?.001, respectively, Gray test). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 per year; P?=?.004), disease stage (primary induction failure versus first complete remission (CR1); HR, 1.5; P?=?.03), and the PAM score (HR 1.04; P?=?.03) had a significant impact on OS. This is the first independent validation of the revised PAM score allowing for simple and valid estimation of transplantation outcomes. It can serve as an important tool in counseling patients with AML, as well as in designing future trials.     

Impact of Pretransplantation Conditioning Regimens on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation for Chemotherapy-Unresponsive Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Grade III Follicular Lymphoma

Patients with chemorefractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas generally have a poor prognosis. We used the observational database of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to study the outcome of 533 patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or grade III follicular lymphoma (FL-III) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using either myeloablative (MA; n = 307) or reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NST; n = 226) between 1998 and 2010. We analyzed nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Only 45% of the patients at transplantation had a Karnofsky performance score of ≥90%. Median follow-up of surviving patients after MA and RIC/NST allo-HCT is 35 months and 30 months, respectively. At 3 years, MA allo-HCT was associated with a higher NRM compared with RIC/NST (53% versus 42%; P = .03), similar PFS (19% versus 23%; P = .40), and lower OS (19% versus 28%; P = .02), respectively. On multivariate analysis, FL-III histology was associated with lower NRM (relative risk [RR], .52), reduced risk of relapse/progression (RR, .42), and superior PFS (RR, .51) and OS (RR, .53), whereas MA conditioning was associated with reduced risk of relapse/progression (RR, .66). Despite a refractory state, a small subset of DLBCL and FL-III patients can attain durable remissions after allo-HCT. Conditioning regimen intensity was not associated with PFS and OS despite a higher risk of relapse/progression with RIC/NST allo-HCT.     

Protective Effect of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation on Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Influenced by Conditioning Regimen

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) has been associated with a reduced risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the influence of the conditioning regimen on this protective effect of CMV reactivation after allo-HCT is relatively unexplored. To address this, we evaluated the risk of relapse in 264 AML patients who received T cell–replete, 6/6 HLA matched sibling or 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donor transplantation at a single institution between 2006 and 2011. Of these 264 patients, 206 received myeloablative (MA) and 58 received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. CMV reactivation was observed in 88 patients with MA conditioning and 37 patients with RIC. At a median follow-up of 299 days, CMV reactivation was associated with significantly lower risk of relapse in patients who received MA conditioning both in univariate (P = .01) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio, .5246; P = .006); however, CMV reactivation did not significantly affect the risk of relapse in our RIC cohort. These results confirm the protective effect of CMV reactivation on relapse in AML patients after allo-HCT reported by previous studies but suggest this protective effect of CMV reactivation on relapse is influenced by the conditioning regimen used with the transplant.     

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplants in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prepared with Busulfan and Fludarabine (BUFLU) or Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Fludarabine (TBF): A Retrospective Study

This is a multicenter retrospective comparison of 2 myeloablative conditioning regimens in 454 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission: busulfan (4 days) and fludarabine (BUFLU) versus thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF). Eligible for this study were patients allografted between January 2008 and December 2018 in 10 transplant centers, with AML in first or second remission: 201 patients received BUFLU, whereas 253 received TBF. The 2 groups (BUFLU and TBF) were comparable for age (P = .13) and adverse AML risk factors (P = .3). The TBF group had more second remissions and more haploidentical grafts. The donor type included HLA-identical siblings, unrelated donors, and family haploidentical donors. The 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 19% for BUFLU and 22% for TBF (P = .8), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 30% and 15%, respectively (P = .0004). The 5-year actuarial survival was 51% for BUFLU and 68% for TBF (P = .002). In a multivariate Cox analysis, after correcting for confounding factors, the use of TBF reduced the risk of relapse compared with BUFLU (P = .03) and the risk of death (P = .03). In a matched pair analysis of 108 BUFLU patients matched with 108 TBF patients, with the exclusion of haploidentical grafts, TBF reduced the risk of relapse (P = .006) and there was a trend for improved survival (P = .07). Superior survival of patients receiving TBF as compared with BUFLU is due to a reduced risk of relapse, with comparable NRM. The survival advantage is independent of donor type and AML risk factors.     

Analysis of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Chronic Grant-versus-Host Disease Manifestations on Major Outcomes: A Chronic Grant-versus-Host Disease Consortium Study

Although data support adverse prognosis of overlap subtype of chronic grant-versus-host disease (GVHD), the importance of site of gastrointestinal (GI) and type of hepatic involvement is not known. Using data from the Chronic GVHD Consortium observational cohort study (N = 567, total of 2115 visits), we examined whether the site of GI (esophageal, upper GI, or lower GI) and type of hepatic (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase) involvement are associated with overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and functional status measures. In multivariate analysis utilizing data from enrollment visits only, lower GI involvement (HR, 1.67; P = .05) and elevated bilirubin (HR, 2.46; P = .001) were associated with OS; both were also associated with NRM. In multivariable analysis using all visits (time-dependent covariates), GI score greater than zero (HR, 1.69; P = .02) and elevated bilirubin (HR, 3.73; P < .001) were associated with OS; results were similar for NRM. Any esophageal involvement and GI score greater than zero were associated with both symptoms and QOL, whereas elevated bilirubin was associated with QOL. We found no consistent evidence that upper GI involvement, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, or NIH liver score add prognostic value for survival, overall symptom burden, or QOL. These data support important differences in patient-reported outcomes according to GI and hepatic involvement among chronic GVHD-affected patients and identify those with elevated bilirubin or higher GI score at any time, or lower GI involvement at cohort enrollment, as patients at greater risk for mortality under current treatment approaches.     

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chemotherapy-Unresponsive Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Cohort Analysis from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Patients with chemorefractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have a poor prognosis. We used the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to study the outcome of 202 patients with refractory MCL who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using either myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NST), during 1998-2010. We analyzed nonrelapse mortality (NRM), progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-four patients (median age, 54 years) received MA, and 128 patients (median age, 59 years) received RIC/NST. Median follow-up after allo-HCT was 35 months in the MA group and 43 months in the RIC/NST group. At 3 years post-transplantation, no significant between-group differences were seen in terms of NRM (47% in MA versus 43% in RIC/NST; P = .68), relapse/progression (33% versus 32%; P = .89), PFS (20% versus 25%; P = .53), or OS (25% versus 30%; P = .45). Multivariate analysis also revealed no significant between-group differences in NRM, relapse, PFS, or OS; however, receipt of a bone marrow or T cell–depleted allograft was associated with an increased risk of NRM and inferior PFS and OS. Our data suggest that despite a refractory disease state, approximately 25% of patients with MCL can attain durable remission after allo-HCT, and conditioning regimen intensity does not influence outcome of allo-HCT.     

Does the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) Predict Transplantation Outcomes? A Prospective Multicenter Validation Study of the Kanto Study Group for Cell Therapy

Recent advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have led to increasing use of this modality in older patients who tend to have been more heavily pretreated and have more comorbidities. Thus, the evaluation of comorbidity is of increasing importance to more precisely assess the benefits and risks of the transplantation procedure. Researchers from Seattle developed the hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI), which was associated with the risk of mortality in several retrospective studies. However, its clinical utility has not been extensively documented in prospective studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of the HCT-CI prospectively in a multicenter setting. Overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 2 years were 59% and 20%, respectively (n = 243). We found that the HCT-CI in its original scale failed to predict OS and NRM in this set of patients. Thus, we applied a flexible HCT-CI risk scoring system (restratifying scores from 0 to 3 to indicate low risk, and scores of 4 or higher as high-risk). The flexible HCT-CI was found to predict 2-year NRM and OS better than the original HCT-CI (NRM: P = .01, OS: P = .003). In subgroup analysis, we evaluated the usefulness of the original HCT-CI for patients excluding those who received cord blood transplantation (n = 186). Both 2-year OS and 2-year NRM were not significantly different according to the original HCT-CI (P = .304, P = .996), but with the flexible HCT-CI, there were significant differences in 2-year OS and 2-year NRM (P = .005 and P = .005, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified age >50, performance status (PS) <90, donor type (HLA-mismatched/unrelated donor), and the flexible HCT-CI ≥4 as significant predictors for worse OS at 2 years. However, the flexible HCT-CI did not remain a significant predictor for NRM at 2 years in multivariate analysis, whereas age, PS, and donor type did. The HCT-CI did not consistently predict both NRM and OS, but it still can be a useful tool in combination with other factors, such as PS and age. Furthermore, the HCT-CI, although potentially useful for capturing pretransplantation comorbidity and risk assessment, may need further validation before its adoption for routine clinical use.