Characteristics of glycemic control in young children with type 1 diabetes

Abtract: Background: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that the rate-limiting step to the intensification of diabetes management in adolescents and adults was hypoglycemia. Young children were presumed to be at even greater risk for hypoglycemia with severe consequences, particularly if they had HbA1c levels < 8%.
Subjects: A retrospective chart review was performed on 148 patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin injection therapy who were < 8 yr of age (mean age 5.7 ± 1.5, mean diabetes duration 3.0 ± 1.4 yr) followed quarterly from July 1999 to June 2001.
Methods:  The subjects were divided into two groups based on their mean HbA1c values (< 8 vs. ≥ 8%) averaged over the 2-yr time period. The following variables were analyzed comparing the two groups: age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, severe hypoglycemic episodes, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), percentage of glucose levels above, within, and below the target range, and number of diabetes home-management competencies obtained.
Results:  Patients with HbA1c < 8% spent more time within target range (40.0 vs. 29.5%, p = 0.0001) and less time above their target range (36.9 vs. 51.2%, p = 0.0003). There was no difference in the percentage of glucose levels below target (23.2 vs. 19.4%, p = NS), percentage of severe hypoglycemic episodes (3 vs. 7 episodes per 100 patient-yr, p = NS), or episodes of DKA (1 vs. 3 episodes per 100 patient-yr, p = NS) between the two groups. Subjects with lower HbA1c levels had acquired more home-management competencies (4.0 vs. 3.5, p = 0.01).
Conclusions:  If families are competent in fundamental diabetes management, young children can achieve HbA1c levels < 8.0% without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.     

Influence of plasma glucagon levels on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between plasma glucose (PG), HbA1c and plasma glucagons levels in children with type 1 diabetes to determine the influence of plasma glucagon on their glycemic control. Methods: The study was conducted in 60 Japanese children, aged 13.3 ± 4.6 years, with type 1 diabetes for at least 3 years of diabetes. Most of the subjects had absent pancreatic β‐cell function. We compared the glucagon levels among patient groups stratified according to the 2‐hour postprandial levels (<50, 50–99, 100–199, 200–299, and ≥300 mg/dL), and the HbA1c levels (<7.0, 7.0–7.9, 8.0–8.9, and ≥9%). Results: The mean 2‐hour postprandial PG, HbA1c and plasma glucagon levels were 174 ± 97 mg/dL, 7.7 ± 1.3% and 84.0 ± 32.6 pg/mL, respectively. The glucagon levels were highly correlated with the PG levels (r = 0.553, P < 0.0001) and mildly correlated with the HbA1c levels (r = 0.301, P = 0.0192). Patients with high PG levels had significantly higher levels of glucagon as compared with those with lower PG levels (139.4 ± 47.2, 78.4 ± 17.3, 82.4 ± 21.0, 98.3 ± 29.2 and 93.8 ± 18.3 pg/mL, P = 0.0009). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in plasma glucagon levels among patient groups stratified according to HbA1c levels (P = 0.1566), however, patients with HbA1c levels ≥ 9% had significantly higher levels of glucagon than those with HbA1c levels < 7% (113.3 ± 53.4 vs 80.8 ± 18.4 pg/mL, P = 0.0291). Conclusion: These results suggest that patients with high PG are likely to have high concentrations of plasma glucagon, which may aggravate glycemic control progressively, leading to elevation of HbA1c levels.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVES: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is more difficult in adult patients with diabetes than in patients with dyspepsia. It has also been suggested that eradication of H. pylori in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus improves their metabolic control. The aim of the current study was to assess the eradication rate of a standard triple therapy and its effects on glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: The authors enrolled 29 type 1 diabetic patients with H. pylori, 29 type 1 diabetic patients without H. pylori, and 29 dyspeptic children with H. pylori. Groups were matched for gender and age and had similar geographical origin and socioeconomic status. H.pylori status was investigated before and 6 weeks after therapy by C-urea breath test. All enrolled patients with H. pylori were prescribed a standard triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori. Glycosylated hemoglobin A and daily insulin requirement were evaluated at enrollment and 6 months later in all patients with diabetes. The prevalence of the most common gastrointestinal symptoms also was investigated by means of a questionnaire in all subjects at enrollment and 6 months later. RESULTS: Eradication of H. pylori was similar in patients with diabetes (24/29) and those with dyspepsia (23/29) (83%v 79%; P = NS). No difference in metabolic control was observed before or after antibiotic treatment in the patients who experienced H. pylori eradication. No difference in glycemic control was observed after 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of H. pylori infection was similar for young patients with type 1 diabetes and those with dyspepsia and did not improve metabolic control in a short-term follow-up.     

Feeding problems reported by parents of young children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy and their associations with children's glycemic control

Objective: Previous research demonstrated high rates of perceived mealtime behavior problems in families of young children with type 1 diabetes who were managed with conventional therapy. Because of new insulin regimens that offer greater flexibility, reexamination of mealtime behaviors is required. We assessed parent-reported mealtime behaviors in a sample of young children using an insulin pump. An additional aim was to evaluate the associations of two measures of parental feeding behavior with children's glycemic control.
Methods: Primary caregivers of 31 young children (mean age = 5.0 ± 1.3 yr) completed the Child Feeding Questionnaire (CFQ) and the Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was used as a surrogate marker for children's glycemic control.
Results: Children had a mean HbA1c of 7.8 ± 0.64%. Mean CFQ – Restriction and Pressure to Eat scores were 3.1 ± 0.94 and 2.0 ± 0.88, respectively (range = 1–5). Mean BPFAS – Parent and Child scores were 16.0 ± 4.3 (range = 10–50) and 44.9 ± 9.3 (range = 25–125), respectively. Positive correlations were found between children's HbA1c levels and caregivers' reporting of frequency of child mealtime behavior problems.
Conclusions: Caregivers of young children on pump therapy report relatively low rates of mealtime behavior problems. However, correlations with children's HbA1c suggest that parent–child mealtime behaviors continue to relate to children's health outcomes. Research is needed to determine if changing mealtime interactions can improve children's glycemic control; items from the BPFAS and CFQ can offer targets to guide interventions.     

Impact of exercise on overnight glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of exercise on overnight hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). STUDY DESIGN: At 5 clinical sites, 50 subjects with T1DM (age 11 to 17 years) were studied in a clinical research center on 2 separate days. One day included an afternoon exercise session on a treadmill. On both days, frequently sampled blood glucose levels were measured at the DirecNet central laboratory. Insulin doses were similar on both days. RESULTS: During exercise, plasma glucose levels fell in almost all subjects; 11 (22%) developed hypoglycemia. Mean glucose level from 10 pm to 6 am was lower on the exercise day than on the sedentary day (131 vs 154 mg/dL; P=.003). Hypoglycemia developed overnight more often on the exercise nights than on the sedentary nights (P=.009), occurring on the exercise night only in 13 (26%), on the sedentary night only in 3 (6%), on both nights in 11 (22%), and on neither night in 23 (46%). Hypoglycemia was unusual on the sedentary night if the pre-bedtime snack glucose level was>130 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that overnight hypoglycemia after exercise is common in children with T1DM and support the importance of modifying diabetes management after afternoon exercise to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.     

Influence of the initial management regimen and family social situation on glycemic control and medical care in children with type I diabetes mellitus

It is well known that social family factors are of importance in diabetes care, but it is not clear whether the initial management regimen can buffer these factors. In a prospective, randomized intervention study, 36 children with diabetes mellitus (type I) were followed, the aim being to study if a family psychosocial intervention at diagnosis could improve glycemic control and minimize hospital admissions. The control group was treated initially in a hospital ward, while the study group received problem-based learning and family-therapeutic and social support in an outhospital training apartment. A number of family social variables were evaluated at the time of diagnosis and 6, 12 and 24 mo later. Family function was assessed using the self-estimated Family Climate Test at these same time-points. HbA1c values and information concerning in- and out-hospital visits to the pediatric clinic were collected for the 5-y period following diagnosis. We found no association between the offered management regimen and glycemic control or rate of readmission. In the study group only, both parents reported a significant improvement of the family climate. An increased risk for poor glycemic control was recorded in children living in oneparent families (p = 0.03) or in families where the father had a low level of education (p = 0.04). Younger age (p = 0.05), a single-parent family (p = 0.05) and poor glycemic control (p = 0.02) were associated with more days of rehospitalization. The rate of divorce in the whole group was at least as high as in the normal population but, surprisingly, maternal dysfunction was associated with lower HbA1c value. The conclusion is that even with an initial management regimen designed to offer a family-individual care regimen based on accurate estimation of the psychological and pedagogical needs, the social family background is a most important factor for the glycemic control and need for readmission.     

Impact of glycemic control on serum lipoprotein (a) in Arab children with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), a major cause of death in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Both type 1 diabetes and CAD represent major problems in Kuwait. Data on the effect of metabolic control on Lp (a) in diabetic children are limited and this is particularly true for Arab children. The objectives of the present study were to analyze serum Lp (a) levels in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with non-diabetic children, taking into account the effect of glycemic control. METHODS: Circulating lipids, including Lp (a), were measured in serum samples from 60 prepubertal non-diabetic children and 58 prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes. Comparisons of Lp (a) concentrations were made between the non-diabetic and diabetic children with good to fair control (glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) <11%) and a group of diabetic children with poor control (GHb > or = 11%). RESULTS: The mean serum Lp (a) level in all diabetic children was 187.62+160.43 mg/L, compared with 162.88+156.06 mg/L in the control group. The group of children with poor glycemic control had higher median Lp (a) levels (147.50 mg/L) than either the group of diabetic children with good to fair control (95 mg/L; P<0.028) or the group of non-diabetic children (125 mg/L; P<0.04). Moreover, 38.3% of poorly controlled diabetic children had elevated Lp (a) levels > or = 250 mg/L, compared with 12.5% of diabetic children with good to fair control and 16.7% of non-diabetic children (P<0.025 and P<0.039, respectively). No association was found between Lp (a), diabetes duration and insulin dose. CONCLUSIONS: In Arab children, highest Lp (a) levels are associated with poorest metabolic control. The prevalence of Lp (a) levels associated with cardiovascular risk is higher in poorly controlled diabetic children. Increased levels of Lp (a) may be another contributing factor to the high risk for CAD in diabetic patients.     

Effect of gluten-free diet on growth and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes and asymptomatic celiac disease

We aimed to evaluate the effects of a gluten-free diet on growth and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) and asymptomatic, biopsy-proven celiac disease (CD). Each case of CD was compared to two children with DM and no CD. We studied weight, height, and hemoglobin A1c (HgbAlc) up to 12 months pre- and post- CD diagnosis in 29 cases and 58 controls. The change in body mass index (deltaBMI Z-score) over 2 years was significantly higher in CD cases vs. controls (mean +/- SD 0.33 +/- 0.74 vs. +/- 0.08 +/- 0.46; p = 0.023). However, BMI Z-score did not change in CD patients diagnosed with DM for > 1 year. Mean HgbA1c was similar between groups throughout the study. In conclusion, children with asymptomatic CD and DM do not have significant changes in BMI, height Z-score or metabolic control 1 year post-diagnosis.     

Improved glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus who attend diabetes camp.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes camp has become a common part of medical practice worldwide. Although patients' knowledge and self-management of diabetes may improve after camp, improved glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels have not been consistently demonstrated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of medical records at the Children's Medical Center Dallas Endocrinology Center for adolescents with type 1 diabetes aged 12-18 yr. We compared patients who did (n = 77) or did not (n = 106) attend Camp Sweeney, a regional 20-d diabetes camp. Some patients (n = 82) and their parents also completed measures of adherence, depression, and quality of life. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased over time in patients who attended diabetes camp {mean [+/-standard deviation (SD)] at baseline, (T1) = 8.6% (+/-1.8%) and at follow-up, (T2) = 8.3% (+/-1.6%)}, whereas it increased in those who did not attend [mean (+/-SD) at T1 = 8.4% (+/-2.1%) and at T2 = 8.9% (+/-2.3%)] (p < 0.005). Seven months after camp (T3), there were still significant differences in HbA1c between the camp and control groups (p = 0.04), with the difference because of persistent improvement for girls but not for boys. Patients' adherence (p < 0.05) and adjustment (p < 0.05) improved by parental report in those who attended camp; parents of patients who did not attend did not report the change. CONCLUSIONS: Attending Camp Sweeney is associated with improved glycemic control and parent-reported adherence and adjustment in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these findings can be generalized to other diabetes camps.     

Use of a subcutaneous injection port to improve glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes

Objective:  To determine if use of an injection port, the Insuflon™, would help to improve glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes (TID) who were in suboptimal glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c, HbA1c >8.0%).
Study design:  A three-arm randomized protocol was used to study the effects of the Insuflon (a subcutaneous injection port) vs. an alarmable blood glucose meter vs. a control group on glycemic control in 66 youth with T1D. All participants used insulin glargine™ as their basal insulin and the NovoPen^® Junior with insulin aspart™ as their rapid-acting insulin. Participants were randomized into control, alarm, or Insuflon groups. HbA1c levels were the primary outcome with values at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
Results:  Initial parameters were similar in the three groups. HbA1c values were significantly lower for youth who used the Insuflon than for the control group at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.025). The HbA1c values (in %) for youth using the Insuflon decreased significantly from 9.4 at screening to 8.7 at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 8.5 at 6 months (p < 0.001). There were no significant reductions (p ≥ 0.05) in the HbA1c values within the other two groups.
Conclusion:  The Insuflon injection port helps some youth with T1D to improve glycemic control.