Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from patients enrolled in a clinical trial in the Philipines

ＡｃｌｉｎｉｃａｌｔｒｉａｌｔｏｔｅｓｔｔｈｅｅｆｉｃａｃｙｏｆｌａｎｓｏｐｒａｚｏｌｅｃｏｎｔａｉｎｉｎｇｄｕａｌａｎｄｔｒｉｐｌｅｔｈｅｒａｐｙｉｎｐａｔｉｅｎｔｓｗｉｔｈｄｕｏｄｅｎａｌｕｌｃｅｒｓａｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄｗｉｔｈＨｅｌｉｃｏｂａｃｔ...     

Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in treatment naïve patients: a risk-based approach

Importance of the field: Kidney cancer is the ninth most common cancer in the USA, with an annual incidence of approximately 55,000 cases per year. Over 13,000 patients are estimated to die from this disease annually. Cloning of the VHL gene, recognition of the associated abnormalities in sporadic clear-cell carcinoma, and its role as a regulator of the hypoxic response, were important milestones in our understanding of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) biology and the recognition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) dependency of RCC. A variety of clinical features, including histologic features, prognostic factors, and patient history of comorbid illness, provide the framework in which the results of recent clinical trials and regulatory approvals of these agents are utilized to develop treatment recommendations for the largest metastatic patient RCC group, the therapy naïve individual.

Areas covered in this review: The rationale for use of VEGF-targeted therapy in advanced RCC patients and the recently developed treatment options for these individuals are reviewed. Regulatory approval of sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), was followed by the approval of sunitinib, temsirolimus, bevacizumab plus interferon (IFNα), everolimus, and – most recently – pazopanib. These licences were granted from late 2005 through late 2009, a very short span of 4 years. In treatment-naïve mRCC patients, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, bevacizumab + IFNα, and temsirolimus were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). The clinical trials and data supporting these approvals are reviewed.

What will the reader gain: This review examines these developments and provides the reader an overview and understanding of available current systemic therapy options for treatment-naïve mRCC patients.

Take home message: As multiple treatment options are now available for treatment-naïve mRCC patients, an understanding of how to utilize this group of agents is required. The use of various clinical features allows a rational approach to therapy selection. These features include prior treatment status, histologic subtype, and prognostic group. Further refinement of therapy selection is required and will require further biologic information as well as comparative randomized trials.     

Metronidazole-based quadruple versus standard triple therapy: which is better as first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication?

The eradication rate of 7-day standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication (a proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has decreased as a consequence of the increase in the resistance rates to clarithromycin. The authors of the article under evaluation conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority, Phase III trial in Europe to compare the efficacy and safety of a 10-day treatment with omeprazole plus a single capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole and tetracycline (quadruple therapy) versus a 7-day treatment with omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (standard triple therapy) in adults, and demonstrated that the quadruple therapy yielded superior H. pylori eradication rates compared with the standard triple therapy. The results suggest that quadruple therapy merits consideration as first-line eradication therapy for H. pylori in regions with high resistance rates to clarithromycin. However, several issues need to be considered, such as the optimal doses of bismuth and amoxicillin, as well as the treatment duration, before quadruple therapy can be established as the standard first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.     

Induction interferon therapy in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C: increased end-of-treatment virological responses but absence of long-term benefit

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The low efficacy of interferon monotherapy and data from viral kinetic studies led us to evaluate the efficacy of interferon administered daily in chronic hepatitis C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C and active liver disease randomly received 3 or 5 MU IFN-alpha daily for 1 month, followed by the same dose three times a week for 11 months. Results were compared to a three-times-a-week scheme of 3 MU IFN-alpha for 1 year. RESULTS: At the end of the induction period, 27 out of 38 (71%) patients had cleared HCV-RNA with a significantly higher rate in the 5 MU than in the 3 MU group (17 out of 18 or 94% vs. 10 out of 20 or 50%, P=0.003). The end-of-treatment virological response rate was 66% (25 out of 38) in the induction groups and 40% (10 out of 25) in the control group (P=0.04). Six months after completion of therapy, the sustained response rate dropped to 29% (11 out of 38) compared to 28% (7 out of 25) in the standard regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic hepatitis C, treatment with 5 or 3 MU IFN-alpha daily during the first month of a standard IFN regimen leads to significantly increased end-of-treatment virological responses, but long-term responses are similar to those of standard IFN monotherapy.     

Initial combination therapy with vildagliptin plus metformin in drug-naïve patients with T2DM: a 24-week real-life study from Asia

Aims: To assess the effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin/metformin initial combination therapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: INITIAL was a 24-week prospective, observational study in T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)?≥?7.5%, and prescribed vildagliptin/metformin as initial combination therapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints were HbA1c change from baseline to week 12, proportion of patients achieving HbA1c ≤7.0%, change in body weight at 12 and 24 weeks, change in HbA1c by sub-groups (baseline HbA1c, age, body mass index [BMI], dosage strength, co-morbidities) from baseline to week 24, and safety.

Results: A total of 532 patients were enrolled. The mean age, HbA1c, and BMI were 49.6?±?11.27 years, 9.3?±?1.57%, and 26.7?±?4.50?kg/m², respectively. Cardiovascular risk factors present at baseline were dyslipidemia (30.1%), hypertension (29.7%), and obesity (20.9%). The mean reductions in HbA1c from baseline to week 12 (?1.6?±?1.59%) and 24 (?1.9?±?1.70%) were statistically significant (p?Conclusions: Overall, in a relatively young drug-naïve T2DM Asian study population with high baseline HbA1c and often associated with cardiovascular risk factors, vildagliptin/metformin combination therapy was associated with significant and clinically relevant HbA1c reduction from baseline. This effect was seen at week 12, was maintained over 24 weeks, and was accompanied by good tolerability.     

Do mucosal defensive agents improve the cure rate when used with dual or triple therapy regimens for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection?

BACKGROUND: Some of mucosal defensive agents have anti-Helicobacter pylori activities. However, their effectiveness in eradicating H. pylori infection has not been evaluated. AIM: To assess the additive effect of mucosal defensive agents in eradication regimens using statistical analysis. METHODS: Pertinent studies were retrieved using the Medline and the Igaku-chuo-zasshi databases in Japan, reference and congress abstract lists. Studies in which regimens consisted of dual or triple therapy with mucosal defensive agents and without them, were selected from the retrieved studies. Eradication rates were extracted from studies according to intention-to-treat analysis. We evaluated the efficacies of mucosal defensive agents by pooled relative risk of eradication rates and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), which were calculated by Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity among the studies in treatment effect was evaluated by a chi2-test. RESULTS: In dual therapy regimens, mucosal defensive agents demonstrated significant additive effects (pooled relative risk 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.61). In triple therapy regimens, these agents did not provide significant additive effect. The clinical usefulness of specific agents could not be established, when each agent was analysed independently. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal defensive agents improve the cure rate when used with existing dual therapy regimens for eradicating H. pylori infection.     

Once-daily insulin detemir in a cohort of insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis from the PREDICTIVE study

ABSTRACT

Objective: PREDICTIVE^* is a large, observational study of the empirical use of insulin detemir in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1DM/T2DM). This post hoc analysis evaluates insulin-naïve patients with T2DM uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who were initiated and remained on once-daily insulin detemir for 12 weeks.

Research design and methods: This observational, multinational, multi-center, open-label prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir in 1653 insulin-naïve patients with T2DM (mean age 60.8?±?10.9 years, BMI 29.8?±?4.8?kg/m², and HbA_1C 8.82?±?1.50%). Statistical comparisons were made between baseline and 12-week follow up data. Our study was subject to the usual limitations of observational studies.

Main outcome measures: Endpoints were: incidence of serious adverse drug reactions, including number of hypoglycemic events (total, major, and nocturnal), glycemic parameters, and weight change.

Results: Following insulin initiation, no significant change occurred in the number of nocturnal hypoglycemic events or total hypoglycemic events (p?=?0.4513), and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed during the 12 weeks of treatment. HbA_1C decreased by a mean 1.25% (SD?±?1.25%; p?<?0.0001), with 30% of patients (n?=?383) achieving HbA_1C <7% at 12 weeks. Mean changes in fasting blood glucose and fasting blood glucose variability were –3.62?mmol/L (SD?±?2.93; p?<?0.0001) and ?0.48?mmol/L (SD?±?1.03; p?<?0.0001), respectively. Body weight decreased by a mean 0.5?kg (SD?±?3.3; p?<?0.0001), with weight loss or no weight change occurring in a substantial percentage of patients in each BMI category (<25, 25–30, 30–35, and >35?kg/m²). Patients with higher baseline BMI lost the most weight, with the greatest weight loss (–1.20?kg) reported in those with BMI >35?kg/m².

Conclusions: Empirical use of insulin detemir as an insulin initiation strategy can improve glycemic control with good tolerability, including a low risk of hypoglycemia and a weight benefit, in a majority of insulin-naïve patients uncontrolled on OADs.     

Rationale and design of TeraViC-4 study: a phase III,randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of treatment duration with peginterferon alfa-2a (40-kDa) and ribavirin in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection without early virological response at week 4

Several studies are available on the efficacy and safety of 40 kDa branched peginterferon alfa-2a (40-kDa) combined with ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. The TeraViC-4 study is a phase III, randomized, parallel group, multicenter study that includes two additional open arms. The main objective is to investigate if extended therapy over 72 weeks increases the rate of sustained virological response induced by a standard 48-week treatment period in na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not show an early virological response. All patients will be treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40-kDa), 180 micrograms subcutaneous (s.c.) once-weekly, and ribavirin, 400 mg b.i.d. Virological response will be assessed by a hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Non-early responders (HCV-RNA still detectable after 4 weeks of therapy) will be randomly separated to receive combination therapy for 44 or 68 additional weeks. Early responders (undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4) will be allocated into two open arms according to HCV genotype and basal viral load, and they will be treated for 20 or 44 additional weeks. All patients will be followed for 24 weeks on no therapy. A total of 504 patients are planned to be included in the study in order to reach the required sample size in the two randomized groups. Efficacy of treatment will be assessed by determination of HCV-RNA and the primary efficacy variable is the rate of sustained virological response (after 24 weeks of treatment-free follow-up) in patients without early virological response. Secondary efficacy variables are the rate of sustained biochemical response, the rate of response in function of HCV genotype, viral load and treatment duration. Safety data will also be recorded and analyzed.     

A phase II multicenter study of ipilimumab with or without dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced melanoma

Objective: Ipilimumab is a fully human, anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced melanoma. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab alone and in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with unresectable, metastatic melanoma. Methods: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients were randomized in this multicenter, phase II study to receive ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks for four doses either alone or with up to six 5-day courses of DTIC at 250 mg/m²/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate. Results: Seventy-two patients were treated per-protocol (ipilimumab plus DTIC, n = 35; ipilimumab, n = 37). The objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 4.8–30.3) with ipilimumab plus DTIC and was 5.4% (95% CI, 0.7–18.2) with ipilimumab alone. At a median follow-up of 20.9 and 16.4 months for ipilimumab plus DTIC (n = 32) and ipilimumab alone (n = 32), respectively, median overall survival was 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.2–18.8) and 11.4 months (95% CI, 6.1–15.6); 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month survival rates were 62%, 24% and 20% for the ipilimumab plus DTIC group and were 45%, 21% and 9% for the ipilimumab alone group, respectively. Immune-related adverse events were, in general, medically manageable and occurred in 65.7% of patients in the combination group versus 53.8% in the monotherapy group, with 17.1% and 7.7% ≥grade 3, respectively. Conclusion: Ipilimumab therapy resulted in clinically meaningful responses in advanced melanoma patients, and the results support further investigations of ipilimumab in combination with DTIC.     

Cost-utility analysis of different peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment strategies as initial therapy for naïve Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND: Different peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment strategies are more effective in treating hepatitis C. However, no cost-effectiveness data have been published using the clinical data from the peg-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C in Taiwan. AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of different treatments with peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for the initial treatment of patients with different genotype chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Individual patient level data from a randomized clinical trial with peg-interferon plus ribavirin were applied to a Markov model to project lifelong clinical outcomes. Economic estimates and quality of life were based on published data and Taiwan patient data. We used a societal perspective and applied a 3% annual discount rate. RESULTS: Compared with different combination therapy strategies, peg-interferon alpha-2b plus weight-based dosing of ribavirin in all patients for 24 weeks is the most cost-effective treatment strategy. If the sustained virological response of peg-interferon plus ribavirin treatment for 48 weeks therapy in genotype 1 patients was higher than 67.8%, the best strategy of treating patients will be the peg-interferon plus weight-based dosing of ribavirin therapy for 48 weeks in genotype 1 patients and for 24 weeks in non-genotype 1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination for 24 weeks therapy in all genotype patients should reduce the incidence of liver complications, prolong life, improve quality of life and be cost-effective for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.     

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.     

Benefits of long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B

Objective: To assess the benefits of long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in reducing the severity and progression of liver disease in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Scope: As complications of CHB, such as hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), take a long time to develop in patients with less advanced disease, the long-term benefits of NA therapy in such patients are more difficult to prove than short- or medium-term benefits. Thus, the recent literature was reviewed to evaluate the impact of NA therapy on the long-term outcomes of treatment-naïve CHB patients.

Methods: A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database was undertaken to identify studies published since 2010 of the long-term use of NAs with high potency and low drug resistance profiles in treatment-naïve CHB patients. A total of 22 studies were identified, many of which were retrospective analyses or case–control studies, as well as three meta-analyses and one systematic review.

Results: Analysis of the retrieved studies showed that long-term NA therapy in treatment-naïve CHB patients did prevent or delay the occurrence of complications, including hepatic decompensation, HCC, and liver-related death, in comparison with no treatment. However, it did not completely eliminate the risk of these complications, particularly in those with cirrhosis. Although long-term NA therapy improved the clinical status of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, the risk of cirrhotic complications including HCC, liver transplantation, and liver-related mortality remained significant in comparison with those with compensated cirrhosis.

Conclusions: Long-term administration is generally advised in all CHB patients treated with NAs because of the high rates of virological and clinical relapse after stopping therapy. The findings of this analysis lend support to the choice of highly potent agents with a low drug resistance profile to maximize viral suppression in CHB patients and halt or delay progression to end-stage liver disease.     

Efficacy and tolerability of initial combination therapy with nateglinide and metformin in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

SUMMARY

Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of nateglinide (120?mg, ac) and metformin (500?mg, tid) as initial treatment in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods: This study reports data from the treatment-naïve (TN) subgroup of patients in a previously published, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial that compared nateglinide, metformin, and the combination therapy (CT) in 701 patients with T2DM with baseline HbA_1c between 6.8% and 11.0%. Of the 401 TN patients, 104, 104, 89, and 104 patients received nateglinide (120?mg, ac), metformin (500?mg, tid), CT, and placebo, respectively. The baseline characteristics of each group were similar, with mean age, BMI, duration of diabetes, HbA_1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of approximately 58 years, 30?kg/m², 4 years, 8.2%, and 10.2?mmol/L, respectively.

Results: In patients receiving initial CT, HbA_1c decreased substantially (? = –1.6 ± 0.1%, p < 0.0001 vs. baseline or placebo) from a mean baseline of 8.2 ± 0.1%, an effect significantly greater than the 0.8% reduction observed with both monotherapies (?p < 0.001); whereas, in placebo-treated patients, HbA_1c increased modestly (? = +0.3 ± 0.1%, p < 0.05) from an identical baseline value. Seventy percent of CT-treated patients achieved a target HbA_1c of < 7.0%. Both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and the 2-hour postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) after a liquid meal challenge decreased by 2.3?mmol/L in patients receiving CT, while the changes from baseline values in FPG and PPGE were +0.2 ± 0.3?mmol/L and –0.5 ± 0.2?mmol/L, respectively, in placebo-treated patients. The incremental 30-minute post-load insulin levels increased by 88 ± 32?pmol/L (?p = 0.006) in patients receiving CT and did not change significantly in placebo-treated patients. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 27% of patients receiving CT (vs. 27.9% in the metformin monotherapy, and 14.4% in the placebo groups). Confirmed hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 2.8?mmol/L) occurred in 3.4% of patients receiving CT.

Conclusions: Initial CT with the rapid-acting insulinotropic agent, nateglinide, and metformin, an agent with insulin-sensitizing effects in the liver and periphery, is a safe and effective means of achieving glycemic targets in TN patients with T2DM.