Hirudin and hirudin fragments]

Hirudin is a potent and specific thrombin inhibitor: compared with heparin thrombin inhibition occurs directly and does not require the presence of plasma cofactors. Recombinant hirudin is well tolerated in animals and in healthy volunteers. Its clearance half-life after IV administration range from 1 to 2 hours and its bioavailability after subcutaneous administration reaches 75%. In most of the experimental models the ratio of the haemorrhagic side effect against the antithrombotic efficacy is satisfactory. Hirudin analogs are mono or bivalent according to their recognition site on thrombin. Bivalent derivatives (Hirulogs) have been mostly evaluated: they exhibit pharmacologic properties similar experimental to that of recombinant hirudin and have been successfully used in several thrombosis models and in healthy volunteers. Taking into account these data the most appropriate use for hirudin and hirudin derivatives should be clinical situations where the role of thrombin is important or which are only partially controlled by heparin therapy.     

Clinician Update: Direct Thrombin Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Antithrombotic therapy has become the cornerstone of the treatment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the thrombin inhibitor of choice for decades. UFH, however, has its deficiencies. To overcome these problems several direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been developed. These agents are capable of inactivating clot-bound thrombin more efficiently, and provide more predictable and safer anticoagulation in patients with of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The initial studies of hirudin and bivalirudin in the clinical settings of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (UA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) conducted in the early 1990s proved to be disappointing. As the knowledge of more appropriate use of these drugs progressed, there is a renewed interest in DTIs. Herein we will review the clinical studies assessing hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban in the settings of AMI, UA and PCI.     

Direct antithrombins: new perspectives in cardiovascular medicine

Thrombin converts fibrinogen to fibrin and is the most powerful activator of platelets thus playing a crucial role in arterial and venous thrombosis. The limitations of heparin, largely used in the therapy of arterial and venous thromboembolism, has prompted the development of new antithrombotic drugs, able to directly inhibit thrombin. They comprise hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban, which are antithrombins for parenteral use, and the orally active ximelagatran which, once absorbed, is converted to the active compound melagatran. Hirudin is a polypeptide able to irreversibly block both the active site and the fibrin(ogen) binding site of thrombin; bivalirudin, a synthetic hirudin derivative, has the same binding sites of hirudin to thrombin but has a shorter pharmacological action and is safer for clinical use. Several clinical trials which tested these drugs in acute coronary syndromes, coronary angioplasty and venous thromboembolism. demonstrate that hirudin and bivalirudin are superior to heparin in significantly reducing cardiac major events. The advantage of hirudin and bivalirudin over heparin was also confirmed in adjuncts to thrombolytic therapy as well as in percutaneous angioplasty relating to thrombotic events but not to restenosis. Hirudin was also significantly better than both unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty. Major bleeding associated to hirudin was not different from that observed with heparin. Preliminary data also indicate that melagatran/ximelagatran may be used in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and in the prevention of arterial embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.     

Haemostaseology

The design and development of new antithrombotics, i.e. anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, is a rapidly expanding area of pharmacological research. New anticoagulants, i.e. inhibitors of thrombin formation and action have been developed and some of them are already in clinical use. This includes hirudin and its analogs, such as bivalirudin. In contrast to heparins, these compounds as well as low-molecular weight inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa directly inhibit thrombus-associated generation and action of thrombin, eventually associated with a reduced bleeding tendency. Orally active compounds are available and currently subject of clinical trials. It appears possible that these new agents may replace cumarins as oral anticoagulants, specifically in long-term use, in the near future. The introduction of clopidogrel marks another important development in the field of antiplatelet drugs. Synergistic actions of this compound with acetylsalicylic acid and GP-IIb/IIIa-antagonists because of their different mode of action enhance the antithrombotic potential considerably and have been clinically confirmed. Despite of this optimistic outlook, the individual risk/benefit ratio of these new drugs, in particular in the area of anticoagulants, still needs to be defined.     

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on a wide range of substrates. Their action is in contrast to heparin and its derivatives, which inhibit thrombin and other coagulation serine proteases via antithrombin, and to the warfarin-type drugs that interfere with synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. There are three direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in advanced clinical testing (melagatran/ximelagatran). The chemical structure, kinetics of thrombin inhibition, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of each of these agents are discussed.     

Emerging anticoagulants: mechanism of action and future potential

Medical needs associated with diverse thromboembolic conditions are not fully met by currently available anticoagulants. Of those, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is gradually replaced by low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndromes, along with supportive treatment with oral anticoagulants, such as warfarin derivatives. While generally effective these agents have several shortcomings involving compliance, delivery, efficacy and safety considerations in various disease settings, and for these reasons new anticoagulants are sought, to target more specifically the critical effectors and steps in the blood coagulation process, namely: (i) initiation, (ii) propagation and (iii) the phase of thrombin activity. The emerging agents that block tissue factor/factor VIIa-dependent initiation phase of the coagulation cascade, include: recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (rTFPI), nematode anticoagulant peptide (NAPc2), active site-blocked factor VIIa (FVIIai) and TF targeting antibodies. Some of them are currently evaluated in clinical trials with promising results. Propagation phase of thrombus formation (e.g. the activity of factors IXa, Xa, VIIIa or Va) is targeted mainly by various indirect, direct and bimodal inhibitors, such as fondaparinux, indraparinux, tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP), antistatin (ANT) and antithrombin-heparin covalent complex (ATH), all endowed mostly with an anti-Xa activity. Although promising, some of these agents (TAP, ANT and ATH) have not progressed beyond animal testing while others (fondaparinux) was already assessed for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for treatment of arterial thrombosis. Lastly, inhibitors of thrombin activity are composed of either indirect (UFH, LMWH), or direct thrombin (FIIa) inhibitors including: hirudin, argatroban, melagatran, ximelagatran, dabigatran, and bivalirudin. These agents are either in advanced development or already approved for clinical use. Bimodal FIIa inhibitory activity of ATH was demonstrated in animal models of venous and arterial thrombosis, but is in need of further development. In conclusion, while some of these emerging anticoagulants, such as fondaparinux, idraparinux, ximelagatran and ATH appear to possess superior efficacy-safety profile, as compared to their conventional predecessors (UFH, LMWH and warfarin), their cost-effectiveness, side effects and antidote availability have to be considered. More importantly, coagulation factors that are targets of these inhibitory activities also affect coagulation independent processes, such as wound healing, inflammation, angiogenesis, mitogenesis and cell survival. Thus the consequences of both coagulation-dependent and -independent effects of new agents should be carefully considered before proper clinical indications are established.     

Novel antithrombotic agents: indirect synthetic inhibitors of factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors. Evidences from clinical studies

The optimal drugs employed in the antithrombotic treatment and prophylaxis have ideally been suggested to have high efficacy and safety and to be easy to use as regards the administration route and the fashion of monitoring the anticoagulant effect. A number of agents are under development in order to improve such requirements. Among them, the present review is focussed on a selective factor Xa inhibitor (pentasaccharide fondaparinux) and the direct thrombin inhibitors now available on a clinical ground. Fondaparinux is the first of a new class of selective antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitors; it does not interact with plasma proteins other than antithrombin, leading to a predictable pharmacokinetics, which renders monitoring and dose adjustment unnecessary. The efficacy and safety of fondaparinux has been assessed in a number of clinical trials. In patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, a 2.5 mg s.c administration once daily induced a 50% average relative risk reduction for overall venous thromboembolism in comparison with enoxaparin but also an increased rate of major bleeding. Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors include hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban. these inhibitors have been studied in patients with coronary heart disease. In particular, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin showed equivalent or higher efficacy but lower bleeding in comparison with unfractionated heparin. Another series of molecules capable of inhibiting thrombin is derived from the site of fibrinogen to which thrombin binds. Inogatran and melagatran have a low bioavailability when given orally, whereas the chemically modified prodrug ximelagatran has a higher bioavailability. Ximelagatran is safe and effective at least as low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery and is safe and effective also in prevention of recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism or myocardial infarction; ximelagatran is more effective than oral anticoagulants in prevention of arterial embolism due to atrial fibrillation, with comparable safety.     

Direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiac disease

Most acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by platelet-rich thrombus superimposed on disrupted atherosclerotic plaque. Thrombin and platelets both play a role in this process. Whereas unfractionated heparin and aspirin have served as cornerstones in the treatment of ACS, several limitations of heparin provide the impetus to seek out better anticoagulants. Direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin, hirudin, and argatroban offer several pharmacologic advantages over heparin. Additionally, bivalirudin also appears to provide clinical advantages over unfractionated heparin therapy in ACS patients and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Oral antithrombins and the future of antithrombotic therapy

The coagulation cascade leads, via thrombin activation, to the formation of fibrin (from its precursor fibrinogen) and platelet thrombus. Several drugs are able to interfere with some of the enzymatic factors involved in thrombin activation, but thrombin inhibitors (heparin, hirudin and hirulog [bivalirudin]) are of particular interest because they disrupt the coagulation cascade by acting upon one of its final steps. Among the thrombin inhibitors, oral antithrombins (ximelagatran) appear to hold great promise for the control of thrombogenicity in a number of clinical contexts. Oral antithrombins do not require the participation of cofactors to exert their action, and in contrast to thrombin inhibitors administered parenterally, they bind specifically to the active site of thrombin without interfering with other portions of the molecule. Their specificity makes these drugs safe and obviates the need to monitor coagulability. Moreover, they show a low rate of interaction with other drugs or with foods, and the response to fixed doses is predictable. A number of clinical studies have investigated antithrombins for prophylaxis prior to orthopedic surgery, in the prevention of cerebrovascular accidents associated with atrial fibrillation, and in the control of coronary artery disease. These studies have shown that antithrombins are superior to other habitually used treatment options. Surprisingly, their use in long-term studies has not been associated with an increased rate of bleeding events. Their interesting molecular characteristics and considerable therapeutic efficacy and safety suggest that oral antithrombins will in the near future become a valuable therapeutic option.     

Hirudin as alternative anticoagulant--a historical review

Advances in separation techniques and biotechnology have contributed to the development of anticoagulant agents from hematophagous animals. The most potent known natural thrombin inhibitor from blood-sucking leeches ( Hirudo medicinalis), hirudin has served as a standard for designing the natural coagulation inhibitors as an anticoagulant drug. The search for the development of hirudin from leech extract to genetically engineered products as an alternative anticoagulant has been resumed. The pharmacological profiling of the isolated thrombin inhibitor has shown that native hirudin is an antithrombotic agent of high quality. However, its clinical use has remained limited, because the substance has not been available in adequate amounts. The progress in molecular biology has stimulated the interest in the structure and function of hirudin. This development resulted in the production of recombinant hirudins (r-hirudins) through gene technology. The biological properties of hirudin combined with the ready availability of recombinant forms make the specific thrombin inhibitor well-suited for use as an antithrombotic drug. Its use should lead to a decisive progress in the management of thromboembolic diseases of both arterial and venous origin. Clinical trials, especially in diseases in which thrombin plays a crucial role, are in progress.     

Influence of bivalirudin on tissue factor-triggered coagulation.

Bivalirudin, a synthetic analog of the carboxy-terminus of hirudin, is a reversible thrombin inhibitor used during coronary balloon angioplasty. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of bivalirudin on thrombin generation. Three in-vitro models (numerical simulations, synthetic coagulation proteome and whole blood) of contact pathway-independent blood coagulation triggered with tissue factor were used in this study. Increasing concentrations of bivalirudin prolong the initiation phase of thrombin generation in a concentration-dependent manner. At subpharmacologic bivalirudin concentrations (0.5-2 micromol/l), total thrombin generation was significantly increased. At a pharmacologic concentration (5 micromol/l), bivalirudin suppressed thrombin generation in the synthetic coagulation proteome; in numerical simulations and contact pathway-inhibited whole blood, no thrombin generation was detected over 1200-2000 s and platelet activation was inhibited by 80%. The addition of a pharmacologic concentration (9 micromol/l) of a naturally occurring protease inhibitor aprotinin in the presence of at least 0.5 micromol/l bivalirudin provided limited enhancement of the bivalirudin inhibitory effect. In conclusion, bivalirudin at pharmacologic concentrations is an efficient inhibitor of thrombin generation, platelet activation and clot formation, which acts not as a modulator but as an 'on-off' switch of blood coagulation.     

Bivalirudin: a new approach to anticoagulation

Bivalirudin is one of the first of a new class of anticoagulants known as direct thrombin inhibitors. These drugs are able to overcome many of the shortcomings of traditional heparin anticoagulation by virtue of this unique mechanism of action. Bivalirudin is a semisynthetic derivative of hirudin, a modified component of leech saliva. Hirudin has been plagued by bleeding complications, likely due to its high affinity for thrombin. Bivalirudin has lower thrombin affinity than hirudin and therefore is believed to be a much safer compound. Bivalirudin has been shown to be a very effective anticoagulant in laboratory models, though its clinical efficacy remains to be fully proven. Bivalirudin has been studied in the setting of coronary angioplasty, unstable angina, and acute myocardial infarction and has shown some promise in many of these settings, particularly in preventing complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. Bivalirudin has consistently shown less major bleeding compared with standard heparin, although limitations in study methodologies somewhat hinder an accurate interpretation of this finding. Larger-scale studies are indicated and are currently being performed, the results of which will more definitively define the role of bivalirudin for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.     

Bivalirudin, blood loss, and graft patency in coronary artery bypass surgery

A safe and effective alternative is needed for patients in whom unfractionated heparin (UFH) or protamine is contraindicated (e.g., those with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or allergy to protamine). Furthermore, choice of anticoagulant may influence graft patency in coronary surgery and may therefore be important even when there is no contraindication to UFH. Direct thrombin inhibitors have several potential advantages over UFH, demonstrated in acute coronary syndromes. However, there are also potential difficulties with their use related to lack of reversal agents and paucity of clinical experience in monitoring their anticoagulant activity at the levels required for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In the first prospective randomized trial of an alternative to heparin in cardiac surgery, we compared bivalirudin (a short-acting direct thrombin inhibitor) with UFH in 100 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Blood loss for the 12 hours following study drug initiation in the bivalirudin group was not significantly greater than in the heparin group. Median graft flow was significantly higher in the bivalirudin group. We concluded that anticoagulation for OPCAB surgery with bivalirudin was feasible without a clinically important increase in perioperative blood loss. A larger study is needed to investigate the impact of improved graft patency on other clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery.     

Antibodies against lepirudin are polyspecific and recognize epitopes on bivalirudin

Bivalirudin is a synthetic antithrombin sharing a sequence of 11 amino acids with the recombinant hirudin lepirudin. We investigated whether antilepirudin antibodies recognize epitopes on bivalirudin. Antilepirudin antibody-positive sera of 43 patients, treated with lepirudin for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were analyzed. Lepirudin- and bivalirudin-coated microtiter plates were used for antibody testing in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. Of the 43 sera-containing antibodies binding to lepirudin, 22 (51.2%) contained antibodies that also recognized bivalirudin. Binding of these antibodies to bivalirudin was inhibited by more than 70% by preincubation with high doses of bivalirudin. However, if lepirudin-coated microtiter plates were used, high concentrations of bivalirudin inhibited only 2 of the 43 positive sera by more than 30%. Therefore antihirudin antibodies must be polyspecific. The clinical consequences of this cross-reactivity are unknown but bivalirudin, targeted by antibodies of patients treated with lepirudin previously, could potentially boost antibody titers in such patients or even trigger an immune response by itself. Clinically significant antibody formation in response to bivalirudin monotherapy has not been observed, however. Yet, as lepirudin and antilepirudin antibodies have recently been implicated in severe anaphylactic reactions, caution is warranted when using bivalirudin in patients previously treated with lepirudin.     

Hirudins for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

At present, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are used extensively for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in most cases represent the agents of choice for these indications. However, both UFH and LMWHs have biophysical limitations. Over the past years, the progress in molecular biology and biotechnology has stimulated growing interest in hirudin, the most potent known natural inhibitor of thrombin. The biological properties of hirudin combined with its ready availability as recombinant forms make this drug well-suited for use as an anticoagulant agent. Available studies indicate that hirudin is significantly more effective for prophylaxis of VTE after total hip replacement than is either UFH or enoxaparin. Only limited data are available on its efficacy in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Moreover, hirudin is effective in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who require further anticoagulation. In conclusion, hirudin is an antithrombotic drug of high quality and may represent an attractive alternative to UFH and LMWHs in the management of VTE, and it is among the agents of choice in patients with contraindications to heparin therapy (such as HIT patients).     

Heparin management in acute myocardial infarction (AMI)

Antithrombotic agents have been shown to be beneficial in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, and as an adjunct to thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The optimal type and dosing of antithrombotic drug, however, remains elusive. Heparin, the agent most commonly used, has several limitations, the most important of which may be its inability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Newer, direct thrombin inhibitors (such as hirudin) provide potent and predictable thrombin inhibition and are able to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Both heparin and hirudin can carry a substantial risk of haemorrhage, however, and thrombin activity is likely to rebound after discontinuation of either agent. Further, the relationships of antithrombotic/thrombolytic dosing, measures of anticoagulation (such as APTT), and clinical outcomes are not always clear. Nonetheless, from the data available from large, randomised trials, intravenous heparin should remain a standard adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for AMI.     

New antithrombotics in the prevention of thromboembolic disease

New anticoagulants are under development to improve on current ones that, although effective, have limitations in efficacy, safety and convenience. We have reviewed the use of these agents as thromboprophylactic drugs. These new agents have more specific modes of action and can be divided into three groups. Inhibitors of the initiation of coagulation work via inhibition of the factor VIIa/tissue factor complex. Inhibitors of propagation of coagulation include parenteral and oral factor Xa inhibitors, factor IXa inhibitors, inhibitors of factor Va and VIIIa, activated Protein C, soluble thrombomodulin and SNAC-Heparin. Finally, direct inhibitors of thrombin are under development both for parenteral and oral administration. Several new drugs, such as fondaparinux, hirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin and ximelagatran, have already been licensed for specific indications and are being investigated for more general usage. Other drugs reviewed are in much earlier stages of development.     

Adjunctive pharmacologic therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: part II anticoagulant therapy

Pharmacological adjuvant therapies to protect against procedure-related thrombotic complication are indispensable during percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition to antiplatelet therapy, use of anticoagulants to prevent acute thrombotic complication during percutaneous coronary intervention is essential. Besides unfractionated heparin (UFH), new anticoagulants have been developed and compared with UFH. Low-molecular weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g. bivalirudin), and recently developed agents such as fondaparinux (a factor Xa inhibitor) provide new alternatives to conventional UFH.     

Bivalirudin: Pharmacology and Clinical Applications

Bivalirudin (Hirulog®, Angiomax®) is a specific, reversible and direct thrombin inhibitor with a predictable anticoagulant effect. It is cleared by both proteolytic cleavage and renal mechanisms, predominantly glomerular filtration. Bivalirudin inhibits both circulating thrombin and fibrin bound thrombin directly by binding to thrombin catalytic site and anion‐binding exosite I in a concentration‐dependent manner. Bivalirudin prolongs activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin time and activated clotting time (ACT). ACT levels with bivalirudin do not correlate with its clinical efficacy. Bivalirudin with a provisional GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor is indicated in elective contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In respect to combined ischemic and hemor‐rhagic endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned urgent revascularization and major bleeding during PCI (including subgroups of patients with renal impairment and diabetes) bivalirudin is not inferior to unfractioned heparin and planned GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors. In addition, bivalirudin has been consistently shown to have significantly less in‐hospital major bleeding than heparin alone or heparin in combination with‐a GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor. Bivalirudin appears to be also safe and effective during PCI in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. Finally, data from PCI studies support the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin, although its direct randomized comparison with unfractionated heparin is lacking.     

Thrombin-activated thrombelastography for evaluation of thrombin interaction with thrombin inhibitors.

For intravenous anticoagulation, heparin has been the mainstay drug, but its use may be contraindicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Heparin alternatives including direct thrombin inhibitors are available, but clotting assays (e.g. partial thromboplastin time) measure the time required to form fibrin gel when only a small amount of thrombin is generated. It was hypothesized that the extent of thrombin inhibition varies among inhibitors, and thrombin-activated thrombelastography would provide useful data on therapeutic responses to thrombin inhibitors. Thrombin was added (0-100 nmol/l final concentration) to nonrecalcified whole blood to evaluate clot formation on thrombelastography. Effects of direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban 3.75 microg/ml, bivalirudin 15 microg/ml, and lepirudin 3.0 microg/ml), and heparin cofactor II activator and dermatan disulfate (20 microg/ml) were evaluated in the presence of 100 nmol/l thrombin. The interactions of thrombin and respective inhibitors were also compared by fluorogenic thrombin substrate cleavage. Increasing concentrations of thrombin progressively shortened the lag time and increased viscoelasticity on thrombelastography. Only 20 nmol/l thrombin caused instantaneous clotting, but maximal viscoelastic force was obtained at 50-100 nmol/l thrombin. All thrombin inhibitors prolonged the lag time (lepirudin > bivalirudin > argatroban = dermatan disulfate), but full recovery of thrombelastography viscoelasticity was observed with argatroban and bivalirudin. Lepirudin abrogated clotting, and dermatan disulfate suppressed clot development on thrombelastography. Thrombin substrate cleavage was observed only for bivalirudin, and heparin cofactor II without dermatan disulfate. The modified thrombelastography technique using nonrecalcified whole blood may be useful in evaluating the extent and reversibility of thrombin blockade with direct or indirect thrombin inhibitors.