Does the progesterone receptor genetic polymorphism +331G/A hPR influence the risk of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women using hormone therapy? The ESTHER Study

Hormone therapy (HT) increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among postmenopausal women. Data on the influence of steroids receptors polymorphisms on this association remain scarce. Since progesterone receptor (hPR) is expressed in human veins and specific progestogens increase VTE risk, we investigated the impact of the functional +331G/A hPR polymorphism on the association of VTE with HT. Using the data of the ESTHER study, we showed that ORs for VTE in current users of progesterone or progestins were not significantly different by hPR +331G/A genotype status. hPR polymorphism appears not to have a significant effect on VTE risk related to HT.     

EMAS position statement: Managing obese postmenopausal women

Introduction

Obesity is a public health problem, with overweight individuals representing approximately 20% of the adult world population. Postmenopausal status is associated with higher prevalence of obesity, as 44% of postmenopausal women are overweight, among whom 23% are obese. Obesity often co-exists with other diseases, the most important being diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and hypertension. Furthermore, obesity increases the risk of gynecologic cancer, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, osteoarthritis and chronic back pain.

Aim

To formulate a position statement on the management of the menopause in obese women.

Materials and methods

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

Results and conclusions

Obese women seeking hormone therapy should be evaluated for their individual baseline risk of developing breast cancer, cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism. These risks should be weighed against expected benefit from symptom relief, improved quality of life and osteoporosis prevention. The lowest effective estrogen dose should be used (CEE 0.300–0.400 mg or estradiol 0.5–1 mg orally daily or 25–50 μg estradiol transdermally). With regard to progestogens, although no RCT data exist, there are observational studies showing that micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may have a better risk profile with respect to breast cancer risk. There are no RCT data comparing various progestogens with regard to VTE risk. There are observational data, however, suggesting that micronized progesterone or pregnane derivatives may be associated with a lower VTE risk in postmenopausal women taking HT compared to nonpregnane derivatives. There is a rationale in suggesting the use of transdermal HT in obese women, since this route of administration has been associated with a lesser risk of venous thromboembolism than oral therapy.     

EMAS position statement: Managing the menopause in the context of coronary heart disease

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke is the most common cause of female death. Premenopausal CHD is very rare but when women enter the menopause the incidence of CHD increases markedly. CHD presents 10 years later in women than in men. The reason is still unclear but the protective effects of estrogens have been suggested.

Aims

To formulate a position statement on the management of menopause women in the context of coronary heart disease.

Materials and methods

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

Results and conclusions

Based on long term randomized placebo-controlled studies hormone therapy (HT) is not recommended for the primary or secondary prevention of CHD in postmenopausal women. In most countries the only indication for HT is the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Women with known CHD or with many coronary risk factors seeking HT because of troublesome climacteric symptoms should be evaluated for their individual baseline risk of developing breast cancer, venous thromboembolism and CHD recurrence. The same applies to non hormone therapy-based treatments where long term clinical studies are lacking. Risks should be weighed against expected benefit from symptom relief and improved quality of life. The lowest effective estrogen dose should be used during the shortest possible time. Transdermal administration is preferred if risk factors for VTE exist. Different progestogens might differ in their cardiovascular effects. Observational studies suggest that micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may have a better risk profile than other progestogens with regard to thrombotic risk.     

EMAS position statement: Managing menopausal women with a personal or family history of VTE

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious cardiovascular event whose incidence rises with increasing age.

Aims

To formulate a position statement on the management of the menopause in women with a personal or family history of VTE.

Material and methods

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

Results and conclusions

Randomized controlled trials have shown an increased risk of VTE in oral hormone therapy (HT) users. There are no randomized trial data on the effect of transdermal estrogen on VTE. Recent observational studies and meta-analyses suggest that transdermal estrogen does not increase VTE risk. These clinical observations are supported by experimental data showing that transdermal estrogen has a minimal effect on hepatic metabolism of hemostatic proteins as the portal circulation is bypassed. A personal or family history of VTE, especially in individuals with a prothrombotic mutation, is a strong contraindication to oral HT but transdermal estrogen can be considered after careful individual evaluation of the benefits and risks. Transdermal estrogen should be also the first choice in overweight/obese women requiring HT. Observational studies suggest that micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone might have a better risk profile than other progestins with regard to VTE risk. Although these findings should be confirmed by randomized clinical trials, they strongly suggest that both the route of estrogen administration and the type of progestin may be important determinants of the overall benefit-risk profile of HT.     

Progestogens in postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer

Hormone therapy is the treatment of choice for the alleviation of menopausal symptoms and the treatment of urogenital atrophy. In women with an intact uterus a progestogen must be added to estrogen therapy to prevent endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. There is a wide variety of marketed progestogens which differ in their pharmacological properties according to their structure. Convincing evidence from both clinical trials and epidemiological studies indicates that combined estrogen–progestogen therapy confers a higher risk of breast cancer compared to estrogen monotherapy. Concerning the different types of progestogens, data from large observational studies suggest that natural progesterone and dydrogesterone are associated with a lower risk of breast cancer compared with the other progestins. Observational studies, furthermore, indicate that sequential estrogen–progestogen regimens may lead to a lower risk elevation compared to continuous regimens. The effect of tibolone on breast cancer is unclear. Concluding, both the type of the progestogen and the mode of HT administration may have an impact on breast cancer risk.     

The role of selective prescribing in the increased risk of VTE associated with third-generation oral contraceptives

In the early 1960s, it became apparent that oral contraception (OC) with oestroprogestogens increased the cardiovascular, venous thromboembolic (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI) and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) risk. The change in medical prescribing patterns, the reduction in ethinyloestradiol dosage and the use of less androgenic progestogens made prescribers confident that the risks would subsequently decrease. At the end of 1995 and early 1996, four publications called into question that optimism by showing that third-generation pills induced a two-fold increase in VTE risk compared with second-generation pills. A biological rationale was due to be announced later. Since then, re-analysis of the data has shown that the thrombotic risk factors are increased in third-generation OC users but, more importantly, that those users (unlike those using second-generation pills) are the women who have not had the opportunity of revealing a latent thrombophilia and are, therefore, at a greater risk of expressing it during third-generation OC intake. When these data are considered, the difference between second- and third-generation OC users in terms of VTE risk is completely destroyed. In addition and although the risk factors (smoking in particular) are concentrated in third-generation OC users, the MI risk is less in those users than in second-generation pill users. This is particularly true in the presence of a risk factor such as smoking. No difference in risk has been observed for CVA in the general population between second- and third-generation OC users, but once more among smoking women the risk is lower with third-generation OC.     

Progestogens in hormonal replacement therapy: new molecules, risks, and benefits.

While the benefits of progestogen use in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are well recognized as far as endometrial protection is concerned, their risks and drawbacks have generated controversial articles. Several risks are attributed to progestogens as a class-effect; however, the progestogens used in HRT have varying pharmacological properties and do not induce the same side effects. Natural progesterone (P) and some of its derivatives, such as the 19-norprogesterones (Nestorone, nomegestrol acetate, trimegestone), do not bind to the androgen receptor and, hence, do not exert androgenic side effects. Newly synthesized molecules such as drospirenone or dienogest have no androgenic effect but do have a partial antiandrogenic effect. Drospirenone derives from spironolactone and binds to the mineralocorticoid receptor. When the cardiovascular risk factors are considered, some molecules with a higher androgenic potency than others attenuate the beneficial effects of estrogens on the lipid profile as well as the vasomotion. On the other hand, other progestogens devoid of androgenic properties do not exert these deleterious effects. The epidemiological data do not suggest any negative effect of the progestogens administered together with estrogens on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. However, recent results suggest that in women with established coronary heart disease, HRT may not protect against further heart attacks when the progestogen selected possesses androgenic properties. The data related to the progestogen effect on breast tissue has been interpreted differently from country to country. However, it has been admitted that, according to the type of progestogen used and the dose and duration of its application, a predominant antiproliferative effect is observed in the human breast cells. As far as breast cancer risk is concerned, most epidemiological studies do not suggest any significant difference between the estrogens given alone or combined with progestogens in HRT. Complying with the classic contraindications of HRT and selecting molecules devoid of estrogenic, androgenic, or glucocorticoid effect should allow a larger use of the progestins without any major drawback.     

Carbohydrate metabolism during hormonal substitution therapy

Oestrogens and progestogens are known to influence glucose tolerance. Impairment of glucose tolerance is seen in particular among users of progestogens with androgenic properties. Dydrogesterone is frequently used as the progestogen adjunct during oestrogen substitution therapy for the management of climacteric complaints in post-menopausal women. However, no detailed data have been published concerning its effects on carbohydrate metabolism. In this study, 20 healthy post-menopausal women received equine oestrogens at a dose of 0.625 mg/day for 2 mth, following which dydrogesterone was added cyclically (20 mg/day for 12 days/mth) over a period of 6 mth. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed before and after each treatment regimen. In relation to the concentrations observed after oestrogen was given alone, dydrogesterone induced only a small increase in blood insulin values which was not statistically significant. The effect was similar to that produced by endogenous progesterone, which is known to be of no clinical significance.     

Recurrent use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism

The epidemiological studies that assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with newer oral contraceptives (OC) did not distinguish between patterns of OC use, namely first-time users, repeaters and switchers. Data from a Transnational case-control study were used to assess the risk of VTE for the latter patterns of use, while accounting for duration of use. Over the period 1993-1996, 551 cases of VTE were identified in Germany and the UK along with 2066 controls. Totals of 128 cases and 650 controls were analysed for repeat use and 135 cases and 622 controls for switching patterns. The adjusted rate ratio of VTE for repeat users of third generation OC was 0.6 (95% CI:0.3-1.2) relative to repeat users of second generation pills, whereas it was 1.3 (95% CI:0.7-2.4) for switchers from second to third generation pills relative to switchers from third to second generation pills. We conclude that second and third generation agents are associated with equivalent risks of VTE when the same agent is used repeatedly after interruption periods or when users are switched between the two generations of pills. These analyses suggest that the higher risk observed for the newer OC in other studies may be the result of inadequate comparisons of pill users with different patterns of pill use.     

Cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of Danish women born in 1936 prior to use of hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE: Many observational studies suggest hormone therapy protects against coronary heart disease in contrast to findings from large randomised clinical trials and an observational Danish study. A potential bias in the observational literature concerning the cardiovascular risk and benefits associated with use of hormone therapy is the so-called 'healthy user' phenomenon, i.e. self-selection to HT use is associated with healthier cardiovascular risk profile. This study investigates whether a random sample of Danish women using HT was characterised by a favourable cardiovascular risk profile prior to menopause. METHODS: A sample of 621 women born in 1936 living in Copenhagen County was included in a prospective population-based study initiated in 1976 with follow-ups in 1981, 1987 and 1996. Investigations comprised questionnaires and physical examinations. RESULTS: At 51 and 60 years, respectively, one-third and one-half had ever used HT. At 40 years women who subsequently use HT had lower body mass index, lower self-rated health and lower fasting glucose, but no differences according to blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride, physical activity, smoking habits or alcohol consumption. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of Danish women from the general population ever users of HT could not be characterised as unambiguous 'healthy users'.     

Biological coagulation findings in third-generation oral contraceptives

An increased risk of venous thrombosis has been demonstrated in women receiving oral contraceptives (OCs). This risk has been primarily associated with the oestrogen content, but recent studies showed that the progestogen may also play a role. A higher risk was found with the so-called third-generation (desogestrel, gestodene) as compared with the second-generation progestogens (levonorgestrel). The risk was approximately two-fold. These unexpected results have been the subject of many debates, and bias--such as selection bias--has been suggested. The existence of bias cannot be completely excluded, but the thrombotic risk seems however to be slightly higher with the third-generation progestins. Haemostatic changes have been observed during OC intake. Both coagulation and fibrinolytic activity are increased: the beneficial profibrinolytic effect may counterbalance the deleterious procoagulant effect. This may explain that the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism is low during OC treatments. Some women who have pre-existing haemostatic abnormalities such as deficiency in antithrombin or activated protein C resistance with factor V Leiden, may be at a higher risk. The biological plausibility of the increased risk related to the third-generation progestogens has been explored. Theoretically, this could be due to an increased coagulation or to a lack of increased fibrinolysis as compared with second-generation progestogens. The only difference presently reported with third-generation OCs is a decreased sensitivity to activated protein C, possibly resulting in a hypercoagulability of greater magnitude. The selection bias suggested in epidemiological studies may also exist for the latter study, as women taking third- or second-generation OCs were not randomized. The possible increased risk related to third-generation OCs should not change the known general contra-indications. Practical guidelines are proposed for women with personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and for those with a congenital cause of thrombophilia.     

Cognitive benefits of hormone therapy: Cardiovascular factors and healthy-user bias

Objective

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study and its ancillary Memory Study (WHIMS) revealed increased rates of cardiovascular risk, cognitive decline and dementia with opposed conjugated equine estrogens (CEE). As a result, previously accepted observational data suggesting cardiovascular and cognitive benefits and reduced risk for dementia with hormone therapy (HT) were largely attributed to ‘healthy-user’ bias. The present observational, community-based, case-controlled study examined the ‘healthy-user’ bias theory by comparing cognitive task performance in two groups of postmenopausal women, who were either HT users or non-users.

Design

Participants were 213 non-demented, postmenopausal women residing in the community and in assisted-living facilities who completed a self-report health questionnaire and underwent a 1-h cognitive test battery. To study the independent contribution of variables in the prediction of cognitive performance, we employed a series of hierarchical regression models adding terms in three stages. The first stage included only HT, the second stage added demographics, and the last stage added alcohol, depression and a cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) composite derived from a confirmatory factor analysis. The CVRF composite consisted of: stroke, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

Results

Although independent samples t-tests revealed no statistically significant differences in the CVRF composite and its individual components between the two groups, HT users tended to possess fewer CVRF than non-users. Conversely, HT users were younger and more educated than non-users. HT users outperformed non-users on 7/9 cognitive variables. The full regression model controlling for CVRF, demographic variables, and mood showed HT users outperformed non-users on measures of verbal memory and abstract reasoning.

Conclusions

While there is some evidence HT users possess fewer preexisting CVRF than non-users, the observed positive association between HT and cognition is not completely explained by this trend.     

Hippocampal volumes are larger in postmenopausal women using estrogen therapy compared to past users, never users and men: a possible window of opportunity effect

Considerable evidence suggests that estrogen can have neuroprotective effects. However, recent results raised important questions regarding the conditions under which hormone therapy (HT) following menopause can be beneficial. It has been suggested that variables such as time of initiation and duration of HT use are of critical importance for beneficial cognitive effects to be observed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential neuroprotective effects of estrogens in aging on brain regions with high levels of estrogen receptors, namely the hippocampus (HC) and the amygdala (AG). In order to better characterize the punctual and long-term effects of estrogens, we tested postmenopausal women currently using estrogen therapy alone (ET), past HT users, never users, and men. Age at menses, age at menopause, HT duration and age were included as covariates in the analysis. Results demonstrate that women using ET had larger left and right HC volumes compared to men, and larger right HC volumes compared to past users and never users. Importantly, we found a significant negative relationship between ET duration and HC volume in this group. The observed effects were region-specific since no significant differences could be observed for the AG. In summary, these findings support a treatment duration dependent neuroprotective role of estrogen on HC volume in aging.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease: an overview of main findings

Cardiovascular disease has emerged as a leading cause of death in women. In recent years, significant attention has been paid to the potential benefits of hormone therapy on chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease. Large prevention trials failed to confirm the cardioprotective effect of estrogen. The divergent findings from observational and randomized clinical studies are summarized and reasons for the different results are postulated. Use of estrogen alone or estrogen opposed with progestins is not indicated for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and may even increase the risk of stroke. Oral estrogen increases venous thromboembolism events. Recent data suggest that transdermal estrogens are safe with respect to venous thromboembolism. Current data have limited ability to investigate the wide variety of hormone treatments available. Clinical research should be continued to assist patients and clinicians in making treatment decisions on the basis of an individual's benefits and risks.     

Olfactometric and rhinomanometric outcomes in post-menopausal women treated with hormone therapy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of hormone therapy (HT) on olfactory sensitivity in post-menopausal women. METHODS: Forty-six naturally post-menopausal women underwent rhinomanometric and olfactometric measurements to compare nasal airflow resistance values and olfactometric thresholds during the eighth month of HT treatment with baseline levels prior to starting HT. Eighteen women used an oral HT regimen, and twenty-eight women used transdermal patch HT. RESULTS: Rhinomanometric values during HT were statistically differ from those at baseline (P < 0.001). Olfactometric threshold data indicated a higher sensitivity during the HT treatment than at baseline (P < 0.001). Finally, no statistically significant difference was observed among women using oral or patch HT administration on rhinomanometric and olfactometric values. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that 8 months of treatment with estrogen and progestogens in HT preparations has an effect on nasal airflow resistance and the olfactory thresholds to odours. We believe that estrogens could influence neuronal plasticity, and the neuronal conduction time into the olfactory system. Our findings confirm that gonadal steroids such as estrogen have an influence on non-genital targets; this relationship might have a beneficial impact on sensorineural communication and emotional behaviour.     

The structure of endometrial microvessels

Recent studies have provided substantial evidence to highlight abnormalities in the structure of endometrial microvessels in users of progestogen-only contraception. Structural changes alone are unlikely to lead to breakthrough bleeding, but appear to be associated with a reduction in vessel integrity, and may reflect alterations in the control and growth of endometrial microvessels in those exposed to exogenous progestogens. In users of low-dose progestogens, immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated changes in superficial endometrial vascular morphology, density and in endometrial migratory cell populations. In Norplant users the endometrial endothelial basal lamina is deficient in the initial months of exposure, when bleeding problems are most common. The basal lamina refers to the very thin structure consisting mostly of collagen IV and laminin seen underlying endothelial and epithelial cells at the electron microscope level. In addition, hysteroscopic studies have demonstrated increased fragility of superficial vessels. Changes in endometrial microvascular anatomy associated with normal menstruation have been reviewed, and are compared with those seen following contraceptive steroid exposure. Likely mechanisms of breakthrough bleeding such as increased superficial vascular fragility and the possible alterations in endometrial vascular structure leading to this are discussed.     

Quality of life in climacteric Chilean women treated with low-dose estrogen

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of low-dose oral estrogen therapy on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 45-64-year-old women from the East Metropolitan Health Service (SSMO) in Santiago, Chile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study. A random population sample of women between 45 and 64 years of age was obtained through an invitation to contact one of 15 primary health care centers of the SSMO of Santiago, Chile. Out of the 927 women who were originally contacted, 844 women were able to complete the Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) questionnaire. Information about demographic parameters, health issues, and modality of hormonal therapy (HT) were registered. Three groups were compared: group 1 (n=647; non-users of HT), group 2 (n=82; users of low-dose oral estrogen HT), and group 3 (n=115; users of non low-dose estrogens HT). RESULTS: There were no differences among groups in terms of demographic and health issue parameters. The results of the MRS scores (total score and somatic, psychological and urogenital domain scores) showed significant differences across the 3 study groups, with more favorable results for HRQoL in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.01 for total, somatic, and psychological scores; p=0.05 for urogenital score). CONCLUSION: Climacteric women in the 45-64 age range using HT were shown to have a more favorable impact on HRQoL than non-HT users. Women using low-dose oral estrogen HT had a positive effect on HRQoL, similar to that obtained using non low-dose estrogen regimens.     

Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: A re-analysis of the MediPlus database.

In October 1995 the Committee on Safety of Medicines advised UK doctors and pharmacists that oral contraceptives containing desogestrel and gestodene were associated with double the risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) compared to pills containing other progestogens. In 1997 data was analysed from the MediPlus database of UK general practitioner records, which reported odds ratios for desogestrel and gestodene lower than that for levonorgestrel. Here the results of a more stringent nested case control analysis on the MediPlus database are reported. The study was larger and cases were verified. A crude incidence of idiopathic VTE was found amongst users of combined oral contraceptives of 4.6 per 10 000 exposed women years. Using levonorgestrel 150 microg + ethinyloestradiol 30 microg as reference, non-significant odds ratios of 1.1 (0.5-2.6) for desogestrel 150 microg + ethinyloestradiol 30 microg and 1.1 (0.5-2.4) for gestodene 75 microg + ethinyloestradiol 30 microg were found. The results of this study show no significant difference in risk between different formulations of combined oral contraceptive.     

Recent advances and evaluation of contraceptive methods

It has been demonstrated that preparations containing estrogens cause metabolic alterations, while such alterations do not occur or are minimal when progestogens alone are administered. Clinical studies were begun using a new polymer that makes possible the release of a constant predetermined amount of progesterone into the uterus for up to one year. The method of intrauterine release of progesterone proved to be very effective in preliminary studies: one case of pregnancy occurred among 263 women observed over 2068 months (.5 effectiveness index). The effectiveness of the method, with the release of a daily dose of 50 mcg, appears to be higher than that of other intrauterine devices and similar to that of combinations of estrogen and progestogens, that are regarded as the most effective method. A great advantage of the new method is that it does not cause systemic effects.