Microvascular histopathology in head and neck oncology.

A histological study of both recipient and flap vessels was performed in 30 patients with head and neck cancer, and relevant preoperative risk factors were assessed. A total of 35 free flaps were transferred in 30 patients; 16 patients had preoperative radiotherapy, 13 were smokers, eight had hypertension and six had peripheral vascular disease. No significant venous pathology was found in either the flap or the neck veins. However, over two-thirds of the neck arteries and one-half of the flap arteries were found to have microscopic arterial pathology. The only pre-existing factor significantly influencing vessel pathology was hypertension (P=0.007). All flaps survived, although in two there was some loss of the skin paddle. This study reveals that the majority of patients undergoing microsurgery in the head and neck region have pre-existing arterial damage in both the flap and the recipient arteries, but this does not have a significant effect on the overall patency of the microvascular anastomoses.     

Posterolateral cervical vein as a recipient vein in reconstructive microvascular surgery of the head and neck

Free flaps are becoming the preferred method of choice for head and neck reconstruction. However, many patients who have undergone radiotherapy and radical neck dissection or who require treatment for recurrent tumor, often present difficulty in choosing recipient vessels. The authors have noted a potential recipient vein coursing vertically along the anterior ridge of the trapezius muscle. They used this vein as the recipient vein in two patients; the two free flaps were transferred successfully without complications. This vein, which they provisionally named the posterolateral cervical vein (PLCV), is considered an important option as a recipient vein in head and neck reconstruction when more commonly used recipient cervical veins are unavailable.     

Microvascular surgery in the previously operated and irradiated neck

Microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects can be extremely challenging in patients with a history of prior neck dissection and/or irradiation. We reviewed of 261 head and neck free flaps performed between 2004 and 2007 at a tertiary cancer center. One hundred twenty-four (52%) free flaps were performed in patients with a history of prior neck dissection and/or irradiation. The ipsilateral external carotid artery or one of its branches was not available in 43 (19%) cases: 13 with no history of prior neck dissection or irradiation, and 30 with a history of prior neck dissection and/or irradiation (P = 0.03). The ipsilateral internal/external jugular veins (IJ/EJ) were not available in 37 (16%) cases: 11 with no history of prior neck dissection or irradiation, and 26 with a history of prior neck dissection and/or irradiation (P = 0.002). Strategies for dealing with lack of a recipient vessels included anastomosis to contralateral neck vessels, transverse cervical vessels, internal mammary vessels, the cephalic vein, and the pedicle of another free flap. We propose an algorithm for locating recipient vessels adequate for microvascular anastomosis should the ipsilateral external carotid arterial and/or the internal/external jugular venous systems not be available, such as in the setting of prior neck dissection or irradiation.     

Use of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels for an omental flap in head and neck reconstruction

The availability of reliable recipient vessels for free flap transfer in head and neck reconstruction may be limited in cases of prior neck dissection or radiation therapy. One solution is to use the internal mammary vessels as recipients for a free omental flap. Five patients were treated with free omental flap transfer using the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels during head and neck reconstruction. Two patients presented with a pharyngocutaneous fistula, 1 had mandibular osteomyelitis, 1 had primary esophageal cancer, and 1 had bilateral cervical radiation ulcers. All patients had received radiation therapy previously (average dose, 75.4 Gy), and 4 had undergone neck dissection (3 bilateral and 1 ipsilateral). All patients were reconstructed using a free omental flap. Four patients had a second free flap combined with the free omental flap (3 free jejunal flaps and 1 free fibular osteocutaneous flap). The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. All free flaps took entirely, the only complication ileus requiring reoperation in 1 patient. The internal mammary vessels are reliable recipient vessels for a free omental flap in head and neck reconstruction. This procedure is a good option for patients in whom previous surgery or radiation therapy has compromised local recipient vessels.     

Utility of “open‐Y” anastomosis technique in the use of superior thyroid artery as recipient vessel for head and neck reconstruction with free flap

Background: The superior thyroid artery (STA) is the most commonly used recipient vessel in free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction. Size discrepancy between recipient and donor vessels might affect the patency rate. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of the “open‐Y” technique in end‐to‐end anastomoses between the STA and donor arteries to those of conventional anastomoses to the STA. Patients and methods: A total of 337 patients with free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction with the STA as the recipient artery were recruited between September 2011 and August 2013. The “open‐Y” technique of anastomosis was used in 72 cases, whereas the conventional technique was applied in 256 cases. The arterial anastomotic site‐related complications and size discrepancy rates of both groups were evaluated and compared. Results: The flap success rate was 98.6% (71/72) in the “open‐Y” group, which was similar to the conventional group [97.4% (245/252); P = 0.999]. Size discrepancy rate was higher in the “open‐Y” group [48/72(66.7%)] compared to that in the conventional group [31/265(11.7%), P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference regarding arterial anastomotic site‐related complications between the “open‐Y” and conventional groups (1.4% vs.4.2%; P = 0.473). Others complications, including re‐exploration, venous thrombosis, hematoma, fistula, infection, partial flap necrosis and total flap necrosis, had similar presentations. Conclusion: The utility of the “open‐Y” technique, applied to STA as a recipient vessel, appeared to be a reasonable option for head and neck reconstruction. This technique seems to be promising for cases with vessels size discrepancy. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:391–396, 2016.     

Arteriovenous fistulas for microvascular head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND:

In head and neck cancer patients, multiple surgeries and radiation can leave the neck depleted of recipient vessels appropriate for microvascular reconstruction. The creation of temporary arteriovenous fistulas using venous interposition for subsequent microvascular reconstruction has rarely been reported in the head and neck. The authors report the largest series of temporary arteriovenous loops for head and neck reconstruction in vessel-depleted necks.

METHODS:

The authors performed a case series of major head and neck reconstructions using temporary arteriovenous fistulas with a saphenous vein graft. A subclavian surgical approach was used. All reconstructions were performed at least two weeks after the creation of the initial fistula.

RESULTS:

The authors have performed nine reconstructive cases for malignancy using five different free flaps. The subclavian and transerve cervical arteries were used, and the subclavian, internal jugular and cephalic veins were used for microanastomosis. Two cases of flap hematoma and one case of venous pedicle compression were recorded. No cases of flap failure were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Reconstruction using temporary arteriovenous fistulas is a reliable technique that can be used in the vessel-depleted neck, with excellent outcomes in experienced hands.     

The cephalic and external jugular veins: important alternative recipient vessels in left-sided microvascular breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels are the standard recipient sites in microsurgical breast reconstruction. We review our series of venous outflow alternatives when these vessels are inadequate or unusable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all free breast reconstructions was performed from July 2003 through December 2005. Outcomes were measured with regard to re-exploration, flap failure, and fat necrosis, with attention to the timing and side of reconstruction, as well as the presence or absence of radiation therapy. RESULTS: A total of 141 free breast reconstructions were performed during the study period. In seven cases (5%), alternative venous outflow vessels were selected (cephalic or external jugular vein). Nine anastamotic complications occurred, all of which involved the left internal mammary group (statistically significant for venous thrombosis, P = 0.0063) and three flaps failed. All cephalic and external jugular veins remained patent with no flap failures or fat necrosis within this group. CONCLUSION: The cephalic vein and external jugular vein are excellent alternatives for venous outflow in free breast reconstruction if neither the internal mammary nor thoracodorsal veins are sufficient, especially in left-sided reconstruction.     

Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck

The selection of recipient vessels that are suitable for microvascular anastomosis in the head and neck region is one of many components that is essential for successful free tissue transfer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a set of factors that are related to the recipient artery and vein and to determine how these factors influence flap survival. A retrospective review of 102 patients over a 5-year consecutive period was completed. Indications for microvascular reconstruction included tumor ablation (n = 76), trauma (n = 13), and chronic wounds or facial paralysis (n = 13). The most frequently used recipient artery and vein included the facial, superficial temporal, superior thyroid, carotid, and jugular. Various factors that were related to the recipient vessels were analyzed and included patient age, recipient artery and vein, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, the timing of reconstruction, the method of anastomosis, previous radiation therapy, creation of an arteriovenous loop, and use of an interposition vein graft. Successful free tissue transfer was obtained in 97 of 102 flaps (95%). Flap failure was the result of venous thrombosis in 4 and arterial thrombosis in 1. Statistical analysis demonstrated that anastomotic failure was associated with an arteriovenous loop (2 of 5, P = 0.03) and tobacco use (3 of 5, P = 0.03). Flap failure was not related to patient age, choice of recipient vessel, diabetes mellitus, previous irradiation, the method of arterial or venous anastomosis, use of an interposition vein graft, or the timing of reconstruction.     

Cephalic vein: Saviour in the microsurgical reconstruction of breast and head and neck cancers

Background:

Reconstruction with microvascular free flaps is considered the reconstructive option of choice in cancer of the head and neck regions and breast. Rarely, there is paucity of vessels, especially the veins, at the recipient site. The cephalic vein with its good caliber and constant anatomy is a reliable recipient vein available in such situations.

Materials and Methods:

It is a retrospective study from January 2010 to July 2012 and includes 26 patients in whom cephalic vein was used for free-flap reconstruction in head and neck (3 cases) and breast cancers (23 cases).

Results:

All flaps in which cephalic vein was used survived completely.

Conclusion:

Cephalic vein can be considered as a reliable source of venous drainage when there is a non-availability/unusable of veins during free-flap reconstruction in the head and neck region and breast and also when additional source of venous drainage is required in these cases.KEY WORDS: Breast reconstruction, cephalic vein, free flap, head and neck reconstruction     

Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects

The development of microsurgical techniques has facilitated proper management of extensive head and neck defects and deformities. Bone or soft tissue can be selected to permit reconstruction with functional and aesthetic results. However, for free tissue transfer to be successful, proper selection of recipient vessels is as essential as the many other factors that affect the final result. In this article selection strategies for recipient vessels for osteocutaneous free flaps, soft tissue free flaps, previously dissected and irradiated areas, recurrent and subsequent secondary reconstructions, simultaneous double free flap transfers in reconstruction of extensive composite head and neck defects, and the selection of recipient veins are reviewed in order to provide an algorithm for the selection of recipient vessels for head and neck reconstruction.     

Impact of vasopressors on outcomes in head and neck free tissue transfer

Objectives/Hypothesis: The primary objective of the study was to determine the frequency of intraoperative vasopressor administration among patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction, and the secondary objective was to determine the impact of intraoperative vasopressor on free tissue transfer outcomes, including the impact of cumulative vasopressor dose and timing of intraoperative vasopressor administration. Study design/Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction at the University Health Network between 2004 to 2008. Results: From 2004 to 2008 inclusive, 485 patients underwent 496 free tissue transfers for head and neck reconstruction. The complete failure rate was 2.2% (11 of 485 patients). The partial failure rate was 1.4%, and the operative take‐back rate for venous congestion or arterial thrombosis was 1.6%. This gave a total major flap complication rate of 5.2%, which was used as the primary free tissue transfer outcome measure. Of the 485 patients who underwent free tissue transfer, 320 (66.0%) received intraoperative vasopressor. Of these patients, the majority (97.5%) received phenylephrine and/or ephedrine. There was no significant relationship between receiving intraoperative vasopressor and major free flap complications, which were defined as complete failure, partial failure, or operative take‐back for venous congestion or arterial thrombosis. Conclusion: Intraoperative vasopressors are used routinely in free tissue transfer for the reconstruction of head and neck defects. The use of intraoperative vasopressors does not appear to adversely affect free tissue transfer outcomes. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012.     

Endovascular treatment of a pseudoaneurysm of a recipient external carotid artery following radiation and free tissue transfer

Radical resection and reconstruction after preoperative radiation has become routine treatment for patients with certain types and stages of head and neck cancers. When microvascular flap reconstruction is required, the recipient vessels have been subjected to radiation, making them more thrombogenic and friable, thus increasing the risks of postoperative complications. The authors report a patient who received preoperative radiation therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the infratemporal fossa and who underwent a radical resection and free rectus musculocutaneous flap reconstruction. The free flap covered the base of the brain from the nasopharynx and closed an intraoral defect. The donor artery was anastomosed end to side to the external carotid artery stump. The patient developed a pseudoaneurysm of the external carotid artery stump 1 month postoperatively, which was treated with endovascular coil embolization without loss of the flap. Percutaneous transcatheter endovascular treatment of pseudoaneurysms that develop after free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction has not been reported previously. One month after surgery, endovascular occlusion of the main arterial supply to the flap did not compromise its viability because of collateral revascularization from the peripheral tissue bed, despite the patient's history of radiation.     

Internal mammary artery and vein: recipient vessels for free tissue transfer to the head and neck in the vessel-depleted neck

BACKGROUND: Microvascular free tissue transfer is a standard reconstructive option for postablative defects of the head and neck. However, the success of this surgery requires suitable recipient vessels in the cervical region. This form of reconstruction can be particularly challenging in the vessel-depleted neck. While the internal mammary artery and vein (IMA/V) have been used extensively in breast reconstruction, there are few reports describing their use in head and neck reconstruction. We report the first case series of the use of the internal mammary vessels for head and neck microvascular reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed 5 cases of free tissue transfers to the head and neck in which extensive prior treatment precluded the use of more traditional recipient vessels in the neck or upper chest. RESULTS: A variety of free flaps were transferred for different reconstructive problems which included: chin/lower lip (n = 2), closure of widely patent tracheoesophageal puncture sites (n = 2), and pharyngoesophageal reconstruction following staged repair of a severe stenosis (n = 1). The radial forearm free flap was transferred in 4 patients and the rectus abdominus free flap in 1 patient. The IMA/V on the right side was prepared in all cases. All free flaps were successfully revascularized without the need for vein grafts and without the need for any microvascular revision procedures. CONCLUSION: The internal mammary artery and vein provide reliable, easily accessible recipient vessels for microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck. The selection of free flap donor sites with long donor vessels facilitates the microvascular repair.     

Isolated adult intestinal transplantation using portal venous drainage

There is some evidence that portal venous drainage may offer immunologic and metabolic advantages in small bowel transplantation. Isolated small bowel transplantation was performed in 14 adult patients. In all cases, the donor pancreas was transplanted into another patient. During the donor procedure, the superior mesenteric artery and vein were separated below the division of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and below the veins of the pancreatic head. An arterial interposition graft was used in all cases. One donor mesenteric artery was reconstructed in 6 patients; two arteries in 5 patients; and three arteries in 3 patients. Proximal arteries of the graft were ligated and the upper part of the jejunum resected. In 10 patients, a direct anastomosis was performed in an end-to side fashion between donor superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and recipient inferior mesenteric vein (IMV). In 2 patients, a branch of the superior mesenteric vein was used and 2 patients required a venous interposition graft to confluence using the donor iliac vein. Patency of the venous anastomosis was documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiography after 6 months. No vascular complications have been observed to date. Portal venous drainage is technically feasible in most cases. An anastomosis to the recipient IMV offers the advantage of being direct despite the short donor vein segment. Furthermore, donor and recipient vessels are well matched for size. Using microsurgical techniques, vascular complications may be avoided.     

Imaging of pancreatic transplant vessels and anastomoses with 16-row multidetector computed tomography

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 16-row multidetector computed tomography (16-MDCT) in the assessment of the potency of arterial and venous vessels in combined kidney-pancreas transplant and detection of transplant-related complications. Fifteen patients underwent a combined kidney-pancreatic transplantation. On the seventh day after the operation, we performed 16-MDCT in arterial and portal venous phase to evaluate vessels, anastomotic sites, and pancreatic parenchymal vascularization as well as peripancreatic fluid collections. We visualized the pancreatic vessels and anastomosis sites in all cases. In 12 recipients, there were no abnormal findings as regards the patency of the arterial and venous vessels and the vascularization of the pancreatic parenchyma. In two patients, complete arterial thrombosis of the body and tail pancreatic graft vessels was recognized at 2 weeks after transplantation, resulting in graft removal. Thrombi were localized in the distal part of anastomoses. None of the patients had venous thrombosis. One recipient had stenosis of the venous anastomosis. Peripancreatic fluid collections were observed in seven patients. In conclusion, 16-MDCT is an efficient method to estimate pancreatic transplant vessels, localize thrombi, and detect other transplant-related complications.     

Total pancreas sampling and transplantation

Pancreas removal and transplantation consists in three main steps: sampling, preparation of the transplant with reconstruction of vessels and finally transplantation. Sampling requires good anatomical knowledge and perfect synchronization between hepatic surgeons so as to ensure adequate dissection of liver and pancreas vessels: portal vein, splenic, upper mesenteric and hepatic arteries. Washing and conservation of organs require the use of University of Wisconsin solution. The preparation of the pancreatic graft consists in reconstructing the unique arterial axis using an iliac arterial fork sutured with upper mesenteric and splenic arteries. The portal vein is lengthened step by step, avoiding venous patch source of thrombosis. The transplantation is realized in the right flank, on the aorta and the vena cava near the iliac crossroads. The digestive anastomosis is performed between duodenum of the transplant and first bowel hail of the recipient. It must be done carefully to avoid any risk of pancreas fistula.     

Fasciocutaneous free flaps for hypopharyngeal reconstruction

Considerable controversy persists regarding the optimal technique for hypopharyngeal reconstruction. The ideal procedure should provide low mortality and morbidity, short hospitalization, a high success rate, few complications, and the greatest potential for neopharyngeal speech and deglutition. In this study, a variety of fasciocutaneous free flaps were used for reconstruction of the hypopharynx. Over a two-year period, fasciocutaneous flaps were used for reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal segments following total laryngopharyngectomies in 16 patients at The National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Flap survival, recipient vessels used, and complications were examined. The ultimate functional and cosmetic outcomes of free flaps were compared. Of the 16 patients included in this study, nine were males, and seven were females. Free flaps used for reconstruction included the radial forearm (8), lateral arm (2), anterolateral thigh (3), and posterolateral thigh (3) flaps. Free flaps were successful in 15 patients. One patient had total flap loss. Salvage surgery was successful for one flap that developed venous congestion. Eleven patients received adjuvant radiation therapy. The commonly used recipient vessels were the small arteries of the neck and the external jugular vein. Five patients developed minor pharyngocutaneous fistulas that healed spontaneously. Six patients developed anastomotic line stricture. Donor-site morbidity was more significant with the radial forearm flap, compared to other flaps. Fasciocutaneous free flaps have a definite place in pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. The flap should be selected with reference to the type of the defect and patient obesity; however, donor-site morbidity should also be considered.     

Renal transplantation with iliac vein transposition

We evaluated a technique for implantation of right kidneys with short renal veins without the need for venous reconstruction. METHOD: The technique of iliac vein transposition was performed in six recipients who received right kidneys with short renal veins. Two cases were living related donors, two were living unrelated, one was an autotransplant, and one was a cadaver kidney recipient. The common and external iliac veins and arteries of the recipient were thoroughly mobilized, allowing for the lateral transposition of the external iliac vein with respect to the external iliac artery. The renal vessels were subsequently implanted in an end to side fashion onto the corresponding transposed external iliac vessels. After implantation, the iliac vein remained lateral with respect to the iliac artery. CONCLUSIONS: The technique described allows for the implantation of right kidneys without the need for venous reconstruction. Such an approach is especially useful in cases of grafts with short veins.     

Vascular reconstruction in limbs with malignant tumors

Patients with tumors in limbs who undergo surgical treatment may present involvement of major vessels. Major arteries must be reconstructed for limb salvage. Major veins may be reconstructed to avoid the onset of venous hypertension. The objective of this study is to analyze the results from surgical treatment of malignant tumors associated with vascular reconstruction in limbs. A prospective follow-up was made of 20 patients with malignant tumors involving major vessels in limbs who underwent vascular reconstruction. Arterial and venous reconstructions were performed in 11 patients, arterial reconstruction in 7, and venous reconstruction in 2. The vascular substitutes utilized were: greater saphenous vein (21), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prosthesis (5), and Dacron prosthesis (5). Vascular complications occurred in 9 patients: 1 rupture of the arterial graft, 4 occlusions of the venous graft, and worsening of previous edema in 4 patients. Nonvascular complications occurred in 6 patients: infection (2), neurologic deficit (2), partial necrosis of the flap (1), and enteric fistula (1). Four patients presented local recurrence, and 1 of them underwent transfemoral amputation. Seven patients presented pulmonary metastases, of whom 4 died. Arterial revascularization in association with the resection of limb neoplasm is a safe procedure with a low rate of complications. Venous revascularization should be performed using an autologous substitute.