Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

Role of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease I: Acute coronary syndromes

The acute coronary syndromes (ACS), consisting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and unstable angina, remain a leading cause of death in the United States. Through the process of atherothrombosis, underlying atherosclerosis can progress to an acute ischemic coronary event. This disease mechanism is also common to ischemic stroke and peripheral arterial disease. As ACS is a heterogeneous disease, accurate patient diagnosis and risk categorization is essential. Treatment approaches for both STEMI and NSTEMI ACS consist of a combination of surgical intervention and pharmacotherapy, with antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel, aspirin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists playing an essential role.     

Role of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease I: acute coronary syndromes

The acute coronary syndromes (ACS), consisting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and unstable angina, remain a leading cause of death in the United States. Through the process of atherothrombosis, underlying atherosclerosis can progress to an acute ischemic coronary event. This disease mechanism is also common to ischemic

stroke and peripheral arterial disease. As ACS is a heterogeneous disease, accurate patient diagnosis and risk categorization is essential. Treatment approaches for both STEMI and NSTEMI ACS consist of a combination of surgical intervention and pharmacotherapy, with antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel, aspirin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists playing an essential role.     

Novel situations of endothelial injury in stroke--mechanisms of stroke and strategy of drug development: protective effects of antiplatelet agents against stroke

Stroke is the second cause of mortality worldwide, and intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) within 3 h of symptom onset is the only treatment proven effective for re-establishment of cerebral blood flow following acute ischemic stroke. However, its widespread application remains limited by its narrow therapeutic time window and the related risks of intracranial hemorrhage. On the other hand, in patients with atherothrombotic risk, antiplatelet agents are widely used to decrease the risk of occlusive arterial events. All of these drugs are used during coronary interventions and in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes. In contrast, only aspirin, cilostazol, and thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are used in the long-term prevention of cerebrovascular events in patients with risk of recurrence. In this paper, we introduce recent clinical findings on antiplatelet therapies for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke and describe basic research that has focused on cerebrovascular protection by cilostazol, which has a unique pharmacological profile.     

Prevention of coronary heart disease with aspirin and clopidogrel: efficacy, safety, costs and cost-effectiveness

Atherothrombotic coronary artery disease is the single most common cause of death worldwide and a growing public health problem. Platelets play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis and are therefore commonly targeted by one or more antiplatelet drugs as part of primary and secondary atherothrombosis prevention strategies. Aspirin reduces the risk of serious vascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death) by approximately 20% in a broad range of high-risk patients and remains the first-line antiplatelet drug because of its relative safety, low cost and cost-effectiveness. Compared with aspirin alone, clopidogrel reduces the risk of serious vascular events by approximately 10% and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the risk by approximately 20% in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Clopidogrel has a similar safety profile to aspirin but clopidogrel tablets are substantially more expensive. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of clopidogrel compared with aspirin is favourable, particularly in high-risk patients and is intermediate compared with a range of other effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of coronary heart disease. Clopidogrel should be considered as a replacement for aspirin in patients who are allergic to aspirin, cannot tolerate aspirin, have experienced a recurrent atherothrombotic vascular event whilst taking aspirin and are at very high absolute risk of a serious vascular event (e.g., > 20%/year). The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin should be considered in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.     

新型P2Y12受体抑制剂替格瑞洛临床研究进展

抗血小板药物是急性冠脉综合征（Acute Coronary Syndrome,ACS）治疗的基石,对防治心肌缺血和介入并发症是有益的。目前治疗ACS和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）指南推荐使用的口服抗血小板药物包括氯吡格雷、替格瑞洛、普拉格雷联合阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗预防复发性缺血事件。本文对新型P2Y12受体抑制剂替格瑞洛的药代动力学和药效学特点以及在ACS患者中的循证医学证据作一介绍。     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.     

Developments in antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes and considerations for long-term management

ABSTRACT

Objective: This article reviews the currently available antiplatelet therapies and emerging investigational drugs in the treatment of acutecoronary syndrome (ACS), and considerations for primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Research design and methods: Primary studies and reviews in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966–2008) using the terms ‘acute coronary syndrome’, ‘antiplatelet’, ‘aspirin’, ‘long-term management’, ‘P2Y₁₂ receptor’, and ‘thienopyridine’. Additional references were obtained by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Articles were included if they were recently published and pertinent, patient-focused, and authors were recognized as leaders in the field. Current review is limited by literature search on single database.

Results: Platelets play a major role in atherogenesis and the formation of thrombi, the main events in the pathogenesis of ACS. Although aspirin is an effective antiplatelet agent, efficacy and safety data from a number of randomized clinical trials on atherothrombotic disease support the use of dual antiplatelet therapies such as aspirin and thienopyridines over single antiplatelet therapy for ACS and up to 1?year following ACS. Antiplatelet agents reduce, but do not eliminate, ischemic events after ACS due, in part, to variable individual response (or resistance) in antiplatelet agents, non-compliance, progression of atherosclerosis, modest inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) levels and other factors. Several antiplatelet agents, including novel P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonists and thrombin-receptor antagonists, are currently under investigation for ACS and primary and secondary prevention in the long-term management of patients undergoing PCI.

Conclusions: Current antiplatelet therapies have clinical benefits such as reducing immediate and long-term cardiovascular risk, but substantial residual risk remains indicating a need for new therapeutic agents. Additional large randomized trials are necessary to determine the most appropriate treatment regimens for ACS patients.     

Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel Antiplatelet Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome

Antithrombotic therapy is imperative in the management of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The combination of antiplatelet therapy in conjunction with antithrombotic therapy has become the standard of care in improving the morbidity and mortality of patients with an ACS and in reducing ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with an ACS are at increased risk for a recurrent event, both in-hospital and for several months afterward. Secondary prevention to reduce these events is accomplished through the establishment of appropriate medical therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and adenosine 5'-diphosphate P2Y(12) receptor blockers such as ticlopidine or clopidogrel are integral components of this regimen; however, both of these thienopyridines have a relatively slow onset of action and variable bioavailability. Prasugrel, a third-generation thienopyridine approved by the US FDA in 2009, has a more rapid onset of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and ticlopidine because of increased efficiency of prodrug-to-active metabolite conversion. The result is higher and less variable concentration of the active metabolite within 60 minutes following oral dosing. Phase II and III trials assessing the safety and efficacy of prasugrel have been completed, including JUMBO-TIMI 26, PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44, and TRITON-TIMI 38. These trials demonstrated greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and lower rates of the composite endpoint of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with clopidogrel. However, major bleeding occurred more frequently with prasugrel treatment than with clopidogrel. This review highlights the current state of evidence-based antiplatelet therapy and provides guidance on appropriate use of prasugrel in cardiovascular medicine.     

The value of clopidogrel in addition to standard therapy in reducing atherothrombotic events

The recent multinational, randomised, prospective studies Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention substudy of CURE (PCI-CURE) and Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) have demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In these settings, clopidogrel significantly reduces the risk of atherothrombotic events, with relative risk reductions of 20-30% (absolute risk reduction 1.9-3.0%). Health economic evaluations based on data from these studies conducted in Europe and the United States have clearly demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin compared with aspirin alone for the management of ACS. Within-trial evaluations based on CURE and PCI-CURE data showed that treatment with clopidogrel on top of standard therapy reduced the cost of initial hospitalisation as well as the total cost associated with hospitalisations. Long-term economic analyses based on the CURE study demonstrate that clopidogrel is cost saving in the Netherlands and that the cost per life-year gained (LYG) in other European countries is between Euros 549 and Euros 5048. In the United States, the cost per LYG for clopidogrel has been assessed at US dollars 6173 on the basis of CURE, US dollars 5910 for PCI-CURE and US dollars 3685 for CREDO, all of which are considerably lower than that associated with common cardiovascular benchmarks. The results are robust and consistent across different countries using varying costing strategies and estimates of survival. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for the management of ACS is both clinically effective and cost-effective in this setting.     

Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Mexico

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) include unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The management of ACS has improved greatly over the last 3 decades, with an associated steady decline in mortality from this condition seen in the US. The benefits of advances in the management of ACS observed in the US have not fully extended to Mexico, as thrombolytic therapy remains the most commonly used reperfusion strategy for STEMI and new antithrombotic drugs are not widely available. However, treatment of ACS in Mexico is rapidly evolving. Dual oral antiplatelet therapy with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin (acetyl-salicylic acid) is becoming the new standard of care for the management of patients with NSTEMI and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Results from controlled clinical studies strongly support the use of early and aggressive treatment with this combination. The addition of clopidogrel to the national formulary represents an important step in the evolution of care for ACS patients in Mexico. Local and regional leadership is required to foster the widespread adoption of this highly beneficial treatment strategy. The main objectives of this review are to highlight the recommendations of the Mexican guidelines for the management of ACS and provide some perspective regarding challenges to optimal management of ACS patients in Mexico.     

Aspirin and Platelet Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Antagonists in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.     

Safety of clopidogrel and aspirin for stroke prevention: implications of the CHARISMA trial.

Antiplatelet therapy is universally recommended for the prevention of recurrent events in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute and chronic coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial disease. However, choosing which antiplatelet agents to use in these situations remains controversial. The use of aspirin, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, or clopidogrel is recommended as initial therapy in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. Based on the results of the MATCH trial, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel is not recommended for patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA due to the increased risk of haemorrhage.The results of the CHARISMA trial support this recommendation; despite previous data demonstrating a favourable benefit-risk profile of aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome, this combination should not be used in patients at high risk for atherothrombosis and those with previous stroke or TIA. In these patients, the CHARISMA trial demonstrated a lack of significant clinical efficacy and an increased risk of bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone.Further research is needed to assess the benefit-risk ratio of clopidogrel plus aspirin in specific subpopulations of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events, and to determine the role of clopidogrel plus aspirin in preventing cardioembolic stroke or early recurrent stroke after symptomatic large-vessel atherostenosis. Recent and ongoing studies are seeking to better define the roles of different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke.     

Ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome?

Current guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin plus either clopidogrel or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, such dual therapy increases the likelihood of bleeding compared to that with aspirin alone. Ticagrelor (Brilique - Astra-Zeneca) is a new oral antiplatelet drug recently licensed in the UK (since publication of the NICE guidelines) for use with aspirin in patients with ACS, including those managed medically or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here we review the place of ticagrelor in the management of people with ACS, and whether it offers advantages over standard therapy in terms of greater efficacy or lower likelihood of bleeding complications.     

Prasugrel: A Guide to Its Use in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US

Oral prasugrel (Effient®; Efient®) provides rapid, potent inhibition of platelet aggregation. It is indicated (in combination with aspirin) for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the pivotal clinical trial in this patient population, prasugrel-based therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of ischemic events than clopidogrel-based therapy. However, the efficacy of prasugrel was offset by a higher risk of bleeding than clopidogrel, with patients aged ≥75 years, those weighing <60 kg and those with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack at the greatest risk. Prasugrel appears to have an overall favorable risk: benefit ratio in ACS patients undergoing PCI who do not have these three easily identifiable clinical characteristics. Limited pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that prasugrel-based therapy is an economically attractive treatment strategy relative to clopidogrel-based therapy from a US healthcare payer perspective.     

Ticagrelor: a review of its use in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Ticagrelor (Brilique?; Brilinta?), a cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine antiplatelet agent, is the first oral antagonist of the P2Y(12) receptor to offer reversible receptor binding. It is indicated in the EU for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adults with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) [unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] or non-STEMI), including those managed medically or with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Ticagrelor provides selective and reversible inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, with a faster onset and offset of action than that of clopidogrel, and is effective in the treatment of patients with ACS, with or without ST-segment elevation. In the large, randomized, double-blind, multicentre PLATO trial conducted in this patient population, ticagrelor was more effective than clopidogrel in terms of preventing ischaemic events over 12 months, providing a significantly lower risk of the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, and was associated with an overall mortality benefit. The risk of major bleeding with ticagrelor, including bleeds related to CABG, did not differ from that seen with clopidogrel in this study, although ticagrelor was associated with more non-CABG-related major bleeds and fatal intracranial bleeding, albeit the latter bleeding events were rare. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to definitively position ticagrelor with respect to other antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel. However, the clinical data currently available indicate that ticagrelor is a promising option for the treatment of patients with ACS and may be of particular use in those at high risk of ischaemic events or unresponsive to clopidogrel.     

Is there a role for oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease?

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an index of systemic atherosclerotic disease and is associated with a high incidence of atherothrombotic complications in coronary, cerebral and peripheral arteries. While antiplatelet agents have been extensively evaluated and shown to be effective in reducing the risk of ischemic vascular complications in PAD, few randomised controlled trials have compared the effects of antiplatelet agents with oral anticoagulants in PAD. Oral anticoagulants have been shown to be superior to aspirin only for the prevention of infrainguinal bypass occlusion of venous grafts in case the bypass is at high risk for occlusion. The effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in reducing vascular morbidity and mortality is still uncertain. However, the reduction of ischemic events by oral anticoagulants is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. As a result, oral anticoagulants have a limited role in patients with symptomatic PAD.     

Acute and long-term antiplatelet therapy

Clinical presentations of atherothrombotic vascular disease, i.e., acute coronary syndromes, cerebrovascular events and events associated with peripheral arterial disease, are the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Platelet activation and aggregation play an important role in the progression and clinical presentation of atherothrombotic disease, and antiplatelet therapy improves outcome in patients with atherothrombotic vascular disease. Aspirin has been the cornerstone of antiplatelet therapy for many decades, but in recent years, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists, mainly clopidogrel and ticlopidine, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (integrin alpha IIb beta 3) inhibitors have also shown similar effectiveness. This review briefly summarizes the major clinical trials and recommendations for the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in patients with established atherothrombotic disease.     

Triple antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Heightened platelet activity plays a critical role in thrombus formation, which is central to acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS (comprising unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and has been implicated in poor clinical outcome. Platelets not only impact coronary thrombus but are major contributors to microcirculatory dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Efforts to inhibit platelet function, including antiplatelet therapy, are paramount to the management of ACS; thus, a growing recognition of the various pathways driving platelet activity has given rise to the need for multiple agents that impart complimentary mechanisms of action. While only inhibiting platelet activation will still allow for aggregation, i.e. the binding of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors to fibrinogen, solely blocking aggregation may leave platelet-activating pathways free to sustain the production and release of various pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic compounds. The benefit of 'triple antiplatelet therapy', referring to the combination of aspirin, a thienopyridine or non-thienopyridine adenosine diphosphate (ADP)/P2Y12 receptor blocker and a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), has been demonstrated in patients with NSTE-ACS who ultimately undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are determined to be at an elevated risk for ischaemic events, and in patients undergoing primary PCI. It is therefore recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Furthermore, the rationale for adding a GPI, particularly in patients with STEMI, is backed by studies that have shown negligible effects of a 600?mg clopidogrel loading dose, despite being administered 4 hours prior to PCI. Moreover, it has been observed that the physiological state of STEMI may deem dual antiplatelet therapy ineffective, because during an acute event the absorption of clopidogrel may be impaired. Nonetheless, there is still considerable variability with respect to the use of triple antiplatelet therapy such as that documented in the Euro Heart Survey. The perception that the mortality benefit afforded by adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy does not outweigh the risk is a likely factor. This may be fuelled by results of trials such as BRAVE-3, which, inconsistent with those for On-TIME 2, failed to prove the value of adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI. Subsequent analyses have indeed demonstrated the positive benefit-risk ratio associated with adding a GPI and determined that the timing of GPI administration could have an impact on clinical outcome related to its impact on infarct size in patients with STEMI. Additionally, it has been presumed that a synergistic effect exists between P2Y12 inhibitors and GPIs. Triple antiplatelet therapy has a significant role to play in the management of patients with ACS managed with PCI. An understanding of patient risk status and timing of symptoms and bleeding risk is crucial to patient selection and ensuring that this therapy is optimized. Though no interaction has been noted in trials of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents, future studies are key to determining the role of this strategy in the era of these more potent agents.