The effect of model-based telephone counseling on HbA1c and self-management for individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

AimsThis study was conducted to examine the effect of telephone counseling based on the Information, Motivation, Behavioral Skills (IMB) Model on HbA1c and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThis study was conducted between January 2019 and September 2019 with a total of 63 (31 interventions, 32 controls) T2DM patients. The intervention group was followed-up for a total of 12 weeks, after 45?60 min of patient training based on IMB, a weekly reminder message and a phone call every two weeks. No intervention was made to the control group. Data were collected at the beginning of the study and at the end of the 12th week. The data were obtained using a Patient Information Form, the Type 2 Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), the Perceived Diabetes Self Management Scale (PDSMS) and glycemic control (HbA1c).ResultsParticipants were on average 54 years old and the majority were female (58.1%). According to the results of the covariance analysis (ANCOVA), there was a statistically significant difference between the pre-post-test HbA1c (F:13.589; p < 0.001), weight (F:32.176; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (F:7.109; p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure between the intervention and control groups (F:2.686; p = 0.106). Also, after three months of follow-up, self-efficacy (F:26.632; p < 0.001), self-management (F:44.487; p < 0.001) and self-management perceptions (F:71.132; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the intervention group.ConclusionThe researchers concluded that telephone counseling based on the IMB model could be a suitable method to improve glycemic control and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Impacts of self-management education on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objectives

Dietary and physical activity advice have been considered to be seminal ingredients in prevention and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this regard, the impacts of a three-month self-management intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes were examined in the present study.

The impact of telehealth on self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review on interventional studies

Background and aimsSelf-management is critical to manage the glycemic and metabolic outcomes for patients with diabetes. Telehealth applications are recognized as a potential approach to promote self-management of people with type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of telehealth on self-management among patients with type 2 diabetes.MethodsA systematic review was conducted on several databases, including PubMed, EbscoHost Medline, and Science Direct, with the keywords: Diabetes Mellitus AND Mobile-phone based OR Telemedicine OR Telehealth OR Web-based OR Telenursing AND Self-management. Inclusion criteria were articles with type 2 diabetic respondents, published between 2015 and 2020, open-access articles, and had self-management as outcomes. Hence, qualitative, protocol, or review articles, commentaries, letters to editors, and case study/reports were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools and Cochrane collaboration's tools were used for assessing risk of bias.ResultsThe total of six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with five randomized control trials and one cross-sectional study. Telehealth applications were formed as an online or app-based platform with the key features of educational programs, text or voice messages, consultations and counseling, and active participation of the subjects. Besides improving the self-management outcomes, the telehealth also indicated improvements in positive behaviors, attitudes, and the intention of self-management.ConclusionThe study concluded that implementation of telehealth provided positive self-management results among patients with type 2 diabetes. The users need to consider an intensive training, peer or family support, and provision of full support for the patients during the implementation of telehealth.     

Culturally sensitive patient-centred educational programme for self-management of type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of a culturally sensitive, structured education programme (CSSEP) on biomedical, knowledge, attitude and practice measures among Arabs with type two diabetes.Research designs and methodsA total of 430 patients with type II diabetes mellitus living in Doha, Qatar were enrolled in the study. They were randomized to either intervention (n = 215) or a control group (n = 215). A baseline and one-year interval levels of biomedical variables including HbA1C, lipid profile, urine for microalbuminuria; in addition to knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) scores were prospectively measured. The intervention was based on theory of empowerment, health belief models and was culturally sensitive in relation to language (Arabic), food habits and health beliefs. It consisted of four educational sessions for each group of patients (10–20 patients per session), lasting for 3–4 h. The first session discussed diabetes pathophysiology and complications; while the second session discussed healthy life style incorporating the Idaho plate method; and the third session dealt with exercise benefits and goal setting and the fourth session concentrated enhancing attitude and practice using counselling techniques. Outcomes were assessed at base line and 12 months after intervention.ResultsAfter 12 months participation in the intervention was shown to have led to a statistically significant reduction in HbA1C in the (CSSEP) group (?0.55 mmol/L, P = 0.012), fasting blood sugar (?0.92 mmol/L, P = 0.022), body mass index (1.70, P = 0.001) and albumin/creatinine ratio (?3.09, P < 0.0001) but not in the control group. The intervention group also had improvement in Diabetes knowledge (5.9%, P < 0.0001), attitude (6.56%, P < 0.0001), and practice (6.52%, P = 0.0001).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the effectiveness of culturally sensitive, structured, group-based diabetes education in enhancing biomedical and behavioural outcomes in Diabetic patients.     

Technology-based and supervised exercise interventions for individuals with type 2 diabetes: Randomized controlled trial

AimsThe purpose of this study was to estimate, for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the extent to which glycemic control was affected by a 12-week program using mobile app and wearable smartwatch in comparison to supervised exercise training.MethodsThis study was a stratified, randomized, assessor-blind, controlled, pragmatic trial with three parallel groups which were supervised, mobile app and wearable smartwatch. Individually tailored exercise regimens delivered through a supervisor, mobile app and wearable smartwatch. Programs consisted of aerobic, resistance exercises, calisthenic, flexibility, balance, and coordination exercises. Primary outcome was change in glycemic control (HbA1c); secondary outcome was Six Minute Walk Test; and explanatory outcomes were exercise behaviour, muscle function, and physical capacity. The groups were contrasted for change in HbA1c and absolute reduction of ≥0.5% (Minimal Important Change). Linear and logistic regressions were used to compare the groups and generalized estimated equations were used to analyze the explanatory outcomes.ResultsIn total, 90 people were randomized, 6 were lost over 12 weeks, leaving 84 with outcome data. The difference in HbA1c did not differ between the supervised and the technology groups combined and between the mobile app and smartwatch group. Proportions of people achieving a clinically meaningful difference on HbA1c between the supervised and technology groups were similar (46% vs 43%) and the associated OR was 0.87 (95%CI:0.34?2.28). Within the two technology groups, proportions of people achieving a clinically meaningful difference in HbA1c were 48% in the mobile app and 38% in the smartwatch groups and the associated OR was 0.65 (95%CI:0.21?2.03). The groups did not differ on secondary and explanatory outcomes.ConclusionsThe results of our trial provide evidence that all outcomes have improved in all groups regardless of the exercise delivery method. Considering the supervised programs are not available for everybody, technological options are crucial to implement to help individuals self-manage most aspects of their diabetes.     

Efficacy of a self-management education programme on patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A randomised controlled trial

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the Spanish Diabetes Self-Management Program (SDSMP) versus usual care in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) residing in a Spanish region.

Impact of the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system on diabetes- self-management practices and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia: A prospective study

Background and aimsTo examine the efficacy of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FGMS) on Diabetes Self-Management Practices (DSMP) and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsThis prospective study was conducted among 105 patients with T2D (aged 30–70 years), who self-tested their glucose levels by conventional finger-prick method using blood glucose meters (BGM). At baseline visit, FGMS sensors were fixed by a diabetes educator to all patients. At the baseline and at 12 weeks of the study, an interviewer collected the responses of Diabetes Self-Management (DSM) from all the study population using a questionnaire.ResultsAt 12 weeks, significant improvements in the DSM subscales were observed, which includes glucose management (P = 0.042), dietary control (P = 0.048), physical activity (P = 0.043), health care use (P = 0.001) and self-care (P = 0.001), compared to the values at baseline. At baseline, when the HbA1c level was 8.2%, at 12 weeks, it dropped to 7.9%. Also, at baseline, when the hypoglycemia frequency was 3.1, it declined to 1.2 episodes/month at 12 weeks. While comparing the blood glucose monitoring through BGM at the baseline (1.92/day), a higher degree of frequency of blood glucose monitoring was evident at 12 weeks (6.84/day), after the patients employed the FreeStyle Libre.ConclusionAfter 12 weeks of using the FreeStyle Libre, the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes and the HbA1c levels were dropped, while the practice of DSM and frequency of blood glucose monitoring were improved.     

The effect of a diabetes education programme (PRIMAS) for people with type 1 diabetes: Results of a randomized trial

Objective

In a randomized, multi-centre trial, the efficacy of a self-management-oriented education programme (PRIMAS) for people with type 1 diabetes was compared with an established education programme as control group (CG). Primary outcome was the effect on glycaemic control in a 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the impact on emotional aspects, self-management related aspects and hypoglycaemia problems.

Methods

The study was conducted in an outpatient setting. 160 participants were randomized. Baseline characteristics in PRIMAS and CG were similar (age 45.1 ± 13.5 vs. 45.9 ± 13.1 years, p = .716; diabetes duration 18.8 ± 12.3 vs. 19.8 ± 13.4 years, p = .615; BMI 26.5 ± 4.6 vs. 27.5 ± 5.0 kg/m², p = .236; HbA1c 8.3 ± 1.1 vs. 8.1 ± 1.0%, p = .236).

Results

At follow-up there was a significant 0.4 percentage points greater reduction of HbA1c in PRIMAS compared to CG (Δ −0.4 ± 1.0% vs. Δ 0.0 ± 0.6%; p = .012). Also, diabetes-related distress (Δ −0.3 ± 0.7 vs. −0.1 ± 0.4, p = .032) and dissatisfaction with diabetes treatment (Δ −3.3 ± 6.9 vs. −1.9 ± 5.6, p = .024) decreased more in PRIMAS. Diabetes empowerment (Δ 2.6 ± 5.9 vs. 0.8 ± 5.1, p = .037) and diabetes self-efficacy (Δ 1.4 ± 3.6 vs. 0.2 ± 4.0, p = .013) increased in PRIMAS. Incidence of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia awareness, diabetes knowledge, and self-care behaviour improved in both groups with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusion

PRIMAS is more effective in lowering HbA1c than a previously established education programmes and also showed superiority in reducing diabetes-related distress and increasing diabetes empowerment, diabetes self-efficacy and satisfaction with insulin therapy.     

2型糖尿病自我管理培训指导网络项目成本-效果分析

目的评价自我管理培训指导网络项目与常规糖尿病教育模式的成本与效果。方法将2007年1月至12月东南大学附属中大医院内分泌科收治的196例患者[男114例,女82例,平均年龄（53±10）岁]根据入院时间分为试验组[n=124,男72例,女52例,平均年龄（54±10）岁]和对照组[n=72,男42例,女30例,平均年龄（51±10）岁]。试验组采用自我管理培训指导网络模式,即给予为期5个半天的糖尿病集中培训加后续强化随访（活动、电话、短信、网络等）。对照组采用常规糖尿病教育,给予分次糖尿病教育指导和后续定期随访。于人组时、6、12个月后使用自行编制的调查问卷记录各组患者一般情况、临床观察指标（糖化血红蛋白、血糖、血压、血脂、体质指数）、医疗成本（治疗费、药费、营养保健品费、住院费、康复治疗费）和项目成本,进行2型糖尿病自我管理培训指导网络项目的成本-效果分析。结果与入组时相比,干预后6、12个月试验组和对照组糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后血糖显著降低（均P〈0．05）。随访12个月时,试验组空腹血糖（6．1mmol／L）、餐后2h血糖（8．6mmol／L）和糖化血红蛋白（7．1％）均低于对照组（分别为6．2mmol／L、9．1mmol／L、7．6％;均P〈0．05）。在一年的随访周期内,实验组使糖化血红蛋白下降1％、使空腹血糖值、餐后血糖值下降1％所需费用分别233．81元、2911．52元、925．81元,对照组使糖化血红蛋白下降1％所需费用为243．37元,使餐后血糖值下降1％所需费用为959．18元。结论糖尿病自我管理培训指导网络模式在改善2型糖尿病患者血糖控制方面更为经济,优于传统糖尿病教育指导方式。     

高尿酸血症和2型糖尿病在代谢综合征中的作用

目的评价高尿酸血症和2型糖尿病(T2DM)在代谢综合征(MS)中的作用，并探讨其可能的作用机制。方法对124例高尿酸血症和56例血尿酸正常的T2DM患者的临床资料进行研究。结果高尿酸血症合并糖尿病组的体质指数(BMI)、甘油三酯(TG)以及冠心病和高血压病的患病率高于血糖正常组，且BMI、总胆固醇(TC)、TG以及冠心病和高血压病的患病率明显高于尿酸正常对照组。结论(1)高尿酸血症与肥胖、血脂异常明显相关。(2)高尿酸血症加重了T2DM患者的代谢紊乱，T2DM也使高尿酸血症患者的代谢紊乱加重，两者共同促进了动脉粥样硬化及冠心病和高血压病的发生。     

The effect of diabetes education based on learning modality in individuals with diabetes incompatible with treatment on compliance and metabolic goals: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to examine the effect of education based on learning modality in diabetic individuals who are incompatible with treatment, on treatment compliance and metabolic goals.MethodsThis study is a randomized controlled trial. Among the individuals who applied to the outpatient clinic and were eligible for inclusion in the study, the odd numbers were assigned to the intervention group (n:30), and the even numbers to the control group (n:30). The practice group of 30 people and the control group were divided into 3 groups. Three groups in the intervention group was given according to the learning modality. The auditory group in the post-training practice group; calling by phone, to the visual group; by Short Messaging Servis, to the tactile group; reminder alerts were made by phone + Short Messaging Servise. Standard training was given to the control group.ResultIt was observed that the total scale score of the intervention group decreased significantly after the training, while the total scale score of the control group increased significantly after the training. As a result of the diabetes education given based on learning modality, significant decreases were observed in A1C, fasting blood glucose, post-prandial blood glucose, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein and blood pressure values of the intervention group compared to the control group.ConclusionStudy findings show that the diabetes education given to the intervention group according to their learning modality positively affects the diabetes management and treatment compliance of the individuals.     

Profiles of smokers and non-smokers with type 2 diabetes: initial visit at a diabetes education centers

Aims

This study explores differences in psychosocial, behavioral and clinical characteristics among smoking and non-smoking individuals with diabetes attending diabetes education centers (DEC).

Methods

A questionnaire was administered to 275 individuals with type 2 diabetes attending two DECs between October 2003 and 2005. The participants’ characteristics were analyzed and multivariable linear and ordinal regressions were performed to adjust for variables correlated with smoking.

Results

Findings revealed that smokers, compared to non-smokers, had lower outcome expectations of the benefits of self-management, lower diastolic blood pressure, and followed their recommended diet and tested blood glucose levels less often than non-smokers. Smokers also had lower intentions to use resources outside and within the DEC.

Conclusions

Results demonstrate poorer self-care behaviors among smokers compared to non-smokers and further suggest cognitive and behavioral differences between smokers and non-smokers regarding participation and attitudes toward self-management practices. These findings identify issues that need to be addressed in diabetes self-management programs to allow for more effective interventions tailored to the healthcare needs of this specific population.     

Resistance training improves the metabolic profile in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Aerobic endurance exercise has traditionally been advocated in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, while the potential role of resistance training has often been overlooked. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of circuit-type resistance training on blood pressure, lipids and long-term glycaemic control (HbA_1c) in type 2 diabetic subjects. Thirty-eight type 2 diabetic subjects were enrolled in the study; 18 participated in a 5-month individualized progressive resistance training programme (moderate intensity, high volume) twice a week, while the remaining 20 served as controls. The exercise group showed improvements in total cholesterol (6.0±.3 vs 5.3±.3 mM; P<0.01), low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (3.90±.22 vs 3.35±.21 mM; P<0.01) and triglycerides (1.91±.25 vs 1.53±.22 mM; P<0.01). Also, the difference in the change in HbA_1c between the groups (0.5%) achieved statistical significance (P<0.01). Circuit-type resistance training seems to be feasible in moderately obese, sedentary type 2 diabetic subjects and the inclusion of circuit-type resistance training in exercise training programmes for type 2 diabetic subjects seems appropriate. Received: 14 April 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 25 July 1997     

Effects of self-management training in Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, prospective trial.

AIMS: The efficacy of three education programmes for Type 2 diabetic patients was tested in a randomized trial. A didactic-oriented training programme (treatment A) was compared with a self-management-oriented programme delivered in group sessions (treatment B). The latter programme was compared with a more individualized approach (treatment C). METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one Type 2 diabetic patients (age 55.6 +/- 6.3 years, diabetes duration 6.6 +/- 6.2 years, HbA(1c) 7.8 +/- 1.6%, female 49.7%) took part. Efficacy was assessed 3 months (t1) after baseline (t0) and at a follow-up 15 months (t2) after baseline. RESULTS: The fall in HbA(1c) in treatment B at t1 was sustained at t2 (t0 8.1 +/- 1.8%, t1 7.3 +/- 1.7%, t2 7.4 +/- 1.9%). In treatment A, HbA(1c) was unchanged throughout (t0 7.6 +/- 1.5%, t1 7.5 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.7 +/- 1.7%; treatment A vs. treatment B; P < 0.05). With the more individualized approach of treatment C, there was a fall in HbA(1c) at t1, but this was not sustained at t2 (t0 7.8 +/- 1.6%, t1 7.1 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.6 +/- 1.6%; treatment B vs. treatment C; P = 0.73). There were also significant benefits in treatment B subjects compared with treatment A in further medical (body mass index and fasting blood glucose), psychological (control, irritability and hunger dependency of eating behaviour, and trait anxiety) and behavioural (exercise) variables. There were no significant benefits of the more individualized treatment C compared with group treatment B. No significant differences were found regarding triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein, diabetes-related knowledge, negative well-being, urine or blood glucose levels or foot care. CONCLUSION: Self-management training had a significantly higher medium-term efficacy than didactic diabetes education. The group sessions were more effective than a more individualized approach.     

Self-management based coaching program to improve diabetes mellitus self-management practice and metabolic markers among uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indonesia: A quasi-experimental study

Diabetes mellitus self-management practice is an essential part of diabetes management among uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the diabetes mellitus self-management (DMSM) based coaching program on improvement of the DMSM practice and metabolic markers. A quasi-experimental study, pre-test, and post-test design with the non-equivalent control group were applied in this study. Sixty samples were selected and were randomly assigned to both the experimental group and the control group. The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) was used to measure the DMSM practice, while metabolic biomarkers were assessed by using the laboratory test. We conducted and compared the DMSM practice and clinical value at baseline and 12 weeks after completing the program. The DMSM based coaching program was a 12-week program with several strategies based on a self-management model. The findings showed that patients who received the DMSM based coaching program have a positive effect on DMSM practice and metabolic marker except for body mass index (BMI). This study revealed that the DMSM based coaching program was practical and feasible for implementation in a broad population with uncontrolled T2DM in Indonesia.     

Randomized controlled trial of single‐agent glimepiride and pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A comparative study

Aims/Introduction: To compare first‐line, single‐agent glimepiride and pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet and exercise with respect to glycemic control, safety and metabolic changes. Materials and Methods: Patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, non‐blind, parallel‐group trial of glimepiride (0.5–6 mg/day) or pioglitazone (15–45 mg/day) for 6 months. Results: A total of 191 patients aged 30–75 years were randomized. Similar percentages of patients attained the primary end‐point, with glycated hemoglobin < 6.9% at month 6 with glimepiride and pioglitazone, respectively (61.2 vs 56.8%, P = 0.64). At month 6, the following significant (P < 0.05) intragroup changes in mean plasma lipid concentrations were noted as compared with baseline: total cholesterol decreased from 203.5 to 195.5 mg/dL and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL)‐cholesterol decreased from 124.5 to 116.3 mg/dL in the glimepiride group, whereas high‐density lipoprotein (HDL)‐cholesterol increased from 51.6 to 56.0 mg/dL and triglycerides decreased from 167.6 to 143.6 mg/dL in the pioglitazone group. The only symptomatic adverse events were mild‐to‐moderate in four patients receiving pioglitazone, and constipation in one patient receiving glimepiride. Similar numbers of patients experienced asymptomatic hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) in the glimepiride and pioglitazone groups (n = 7 and 5, respectively). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between glimepiride and pioglitazone with respect to glycemic control, and both agents were well tolerated. Glimepiride significantly lowered total cholesterol and LDL‐cholesterol, whereas pioglitazone increased HDL‐cholesterol. This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan, UMIN000004582. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00115.x, 2011)