Down-regulation of the immune response to histocompatibility antigens and prevention of sensitization by skin allografts by orally administered alloantigen.

The effects of oral administration of major histocompatibility antigens on the alloimmune response have not been investigated. Lymphocytes from inbred LEW (RT1u) rats that were pre-fed allogeneic WF (RT1l) splenocytes exhibited significant antigen specific reduction of the mixed lymphocyte response in vitro and delayed-type hypersensitivity response in vivo, when compared with unfed controls. In an accelerated allograft rejection model, LEW rats were presensitized with BN (RT1n) skin allografts 7 days before challenging them with (LEW x BN)F1 or BN vascularized cardiac allografts. While sensitized control animals hyperacutely reject their cardiac allografts within 2 days, animals prefed with BN splenocytes maintained cardiac allograft survival to 7 days, a time similar to that observed in unsensitized control recipients. This phenomenon was antigen-specific, as third-party WF grafts were rejected within 2 days. Immunohistologic examination of cardiac allografts harvested on day 2 from the fed animals had markedly reduced deposition of IgG, IgM, C3, and fibrin. In addition, there were significantly fewer cellular infiltrates of total white blood cells, neutrophils, macrophages, T cells, IL-2 receptor-positive T cells, and mononuclear cells with positive staining for the activation cytokines IL-2 and IFN-g. On day 6 posttransplant, the grafts from fed animals showed immunohistologic changes typical of acute cellular rejection usually seen in unsensitized rejecting controls. Feeding allogeneic splenocytes prevents sensitization by skin grafts and transforms accelerated rejection of vascularized cardiac allografts to an acute form typical of unsensitized recipients. Oral administration of alloantigen provides a novel approach to down-regulate the specific systemic alloimmune response against histocompatibility antigens.     

Induction of donor-specific tolerance in rat hind-limb allografts under antilymphocyte serum and cyclosporine A protocol

Composite tissue allograft (CTA) transplantation became a clinical reality despite major side effects associated with the administration of chronic immunosuppression. Development of new treatment modalities eliminating life-long immunosuppression is essential for the future of CTA transplantation. In this study, combined use of cyclosporine A (CsA) and antilymphocyte serum (ALS) was tested for the potential to induce tolerance in the rat hind-limb allograft recipients across a major histocompatibility (MHC) barrier (Lewis-Brown-Norway [LBN, RT1(l+n)] to Lewis [LEW, RT1(l)] rats). Thirty transplantations were performed in 5 experimental groups. Animals received CsA and ALS 12 hours before surgery for 21 days thereafter. Although the allograft controls rejected their limbs at day 7 combined treatment of CsA and ALS resulted in indefinite survival (over 420 d) in all allograft recipients. Long-term survivors showed 35% to 42% of donor-specific chimerism in the peripheral blood. Clinical tolerance was confirmed by acceptance of the donor-specific skin grafts and immunocompetence was confirmed by rejection of the third-party grafts. Mixed lymphocyte reaction revealed suppressed response against donor-type antigens and increased response to third-party antigens. Donor-specific tolerance across MHC barrier was induced in CTA allografts under 21 days protocol of ALS/CsA.     

Small bowel transplantation in the rat. Effect of pretransplant blood transfusions and cyclosporine on host survival

We investigated the effect of pretransplant conditioning as a way to reduce the need for the aggressive immunosuppressive therapy reportedly required in small bowel (SB) allograft recipients. LEW rats were conditioned with (1) a donor-specific blood transfusion (DST) on day -8 and a concurrent 5-day course of CsA (10 mg/kg/day); (2) a nonspecific blood transfusion and CsA; (3) CsA alone. A 10-cm segment of the host native bowel was then replaced with an equivalent segment of SB obtained from ACI rats. Postoperative treatment consisted of CsA at 2.5 mg/kg/day for 30 days. Rats conditioned with a nonspecific transfusion and CsA or with CsA alone survived for 14.1 +/- 5.8 and 18.3 +/- 5.7 days, respectively. In contrast, rats conditioned with DST and CsA survived for 60.3 +/- 36.2 days (P less than 0.001 vs. both controls). Biopsies taken from long-term survivors showed a normal bowel architecture. The function of the allografts was studied in a group of animals totally deprived of their native bowel and transplanted with a 30-cm segment of ACI SB. CsA-DST-treated recipients survived an average of 90 +/- 43 days and grew at a rate comparable to isografted animals. Treated allograft recipients had maltose absorption indistinguishable from isografted controls at all times tested. In contrast, maltose absorption was severely impaired in recipients rejecting their grafts. This study demonstrates that long-term survival of SB allograft recipients can be achieved with good functional results with low doses of CsA in recipients conditioned with DST and CsA.     

Donor-specific tolerance in fully major histocompatibility major histocompatibility complex-mismatched limb allograft transplants under an anti-alphabeta T-cell receptor monoclonal antibody and cyclosporine A protocol

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that treatment with alphabeta-T-cell receptor (TCR) monoclonal antibody and cyclosporine A (CsA) can extend survival in composite tissue allografts (CTA). The purpose of this study was to induce tolerance in fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched rat limb allografts under 7 days of a combined alphabeta-TCR-CsA protocol. METHODS: The authors performed 30 hind-limb allotransplantations across the MHC barrier between Brown Norway donors (BN; RT1n) and Lewis recipients (LEW; RT1l). Isograft and allograft controls received no treatment. The experimental groups received monotherapy of alphabeta-TCR and CsA or a combination of alphabeta-TCR and CsA for 7 days only. Donor-specific tolerance and immunocompetence were determined by standard skin grafting in vivo and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) in vitro. The efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy and the level of donor-specific chimerism were determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Long-term survival (>350 days) was achieved in allograft recipients (n=6) under the 7-day protocol of combined alphabeta-TCR-CsA. Donor-specific tolerance and immunocompetence of long-term chimeras were confirmed by acceptance of skin grafts from the donors and rejection of the third-party alloantigens (AxC Irish). At day 120, MLR demonstrated unresponsiveness to the host and donor antigens but strong reactivity against third-party alloantigens. Flow cytometry confirmed the high efficacy of immunosuppressive treatment and the development of donor-specific chimerism (7.6% of CD4+-RT1n+ cells, 1.3% of CD8+-RT1n+ cells, and 16.5% of CD45RA+-RT1n+ cells) in the periphery of tolerated recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy of alphabeta-TCR-CsA for 7 days resulted in tolerance induction in fully MHC-mismatched rat hind-limb allografts. Tolerance was directly associated with stable, donor-specific chimerism.     

Intragraft delivery of 16, 16-dimethyl PGE2 induces donor-specific tolerance in rat cardiac allograft recipients

The stable prostaglandin E2 analogue, 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 (di-M-PGE2) was continuously infused by osmotic pump directly into rat heterotopic cardiac allografts. Intragraft delivery of 20 micrograms/kg/day di-M-PGE2 for 2 weeks completely prevented graft rejection for more than 150 days (n = 10), while untreated Buffalo recipients rejected Lewis cardiac allografts within 8 days after transplantation (mean survival time = 7.4 +/- 0.5 days, n = 5). When given for only 1 week, 20 micrograms/kg/day had a partial effect, since 60% of recipients accepted grafts long-term and 40% experienced rejection by day 14 (n = 5). In contrast, systemic intravenous administration of 20 micrograms/kg/day di-M-PGE2 for 2 weeks could not prolong graft survival (MST = 7.0 +/- 0.0 days, n = 3), and the higher dose of 200 micrograms/kg/day resulted in death by day 2 (n = 5). Long-term BUF recipients of LEW cardiac allografts accepted LEW donor strain skin grafts for more than 35 days while rejecting third-party Wistar Furth skin grafts in a normal fashion (MST = 7.3 +/- 0.5 days, n = 3), indicating the induction of donor-specific tolerance. Long-surviving LEW cardiac allografts retransplanted into naive BUF recipients were rejected within 7 days (MST = 6.7 +/- 0.5 days, n = 3), indicating no change in graft immunogenicity. Therefore, a 14-day infusion of di-M-PGE2 directly into a strongly MHC-mismatched cardiac allograft uniformly has resulted in long-term engraftment and the development of recipient donor-specific tolerance.     

Intrathymic immunomodulation in sensitized rat recipients of cardiac allografts: requirements for allorecognition pathways.

BACKGROUND: Intrathymic injection of alloantigen in the form of donor cells, soluble major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, or MHC allopeptides induces donor-specific tolerance in a variety of acute allograft rejection models. We have previously shown that a single intrathymic injection of donor spleen cells into pre-sensitized rats abrogates accelerated (circa 24-hour) rejection and prolongs the survival of cardiac allografts to about 7 days. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms by which intrathymic administration of donor cells modifies the course of accelerated rejection. METHODS: Lewis RT1(1) (LEW) rats sensitized by transplantation with Wistar-Furth RT1(u) (WF) skin grafts received WF cardiac allografts 7 days later-a classic model of accelerated rejection. At the time of skin challenge, however, certain animals received intrathymic cell suspensions (either allogeneic or syngeneic) or donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC peptides. RESULTS: Control animals (sensitized by skin grafts but receiving no other treatment) rejected cardiac allografts within 24 hours. Intrathymic injection of WF splenocytes at the time of skin transplantation abrogated rejection at 24 hours and prolonged cardiac allograft survival to 6.6+/-0.6 days (p<0.001), whereas intrathymic administration of syngeneic (LEW) or allogeneic third party Brown Norway RT1(n) cells was ineffective in this regard. Intrathymic injection of gamma-irradiated donor cells marginally extended cardiac allograft survival to 3.0+/-0.9 days (p< 0.001), but the grafts were still rejected in an accelerated fashion. Intrathymic injection of donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC allopeptides at the same time period also failed to prolong cardiac allograft survival beyond 3 days. In the group receiving unmodified donor cells, elevated immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) allo-antibodies were found at the time of cardiac transplantation; this pattern was not observed with any other treatment. CONCLUSION: The superiority of non-modified donor spleen cells over gamma-irradiated donor cells or donor specific allopeptides in modifying the course of accelerated cardiac rejection suggests that direct allorecognition is the dominant pathway initiating rejection in sensitized transplant recipients. Marked alterations in the antidonor IgM and IgG responses are associated with successful abrogation of accelerated rejection by thymic immunomodulatory mechanisms.     

Development and maintenance of donor-specific chimerism in semi-allogenic and fully major histocompatibility complex mismatched facial allograft transplants

BACKGROUND: The clinical application of composite tissue allograft transplants opened the discussion on the restoration of facial deformities by allotransplantation. We introduce a hemifacial allograft transplant model to investigate the rationale for the development of operational tolerance across a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barrier. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty rats were studied in five groups of six animals each. The composite hemiface isograft transplantations were performed in group 1. Allograft rejection controls included semi-allogenic transplantations from LBN (RT1(1+n) donors (group 2) and fully allogenic transplantations from ACI (RT1a) donors (group 3) to LEW (RT1(1)) recipients. In the allograft treatment groups, recipients of LBN (group 4) and ACI donors (group 5) were treated with cyclosporine A monotherapy (16 mg/kg/day, tapered to 2 mg/kg/day). Face allografts were evaluated clinically and histologically. Donor-specific chimerism for MHC class I RT1n and RT1a antigens was assessed by flow cytometry. Mixed lymphocyte reaction for donor-specific tolerance in vitro was tested at day 160 posttransplant. RESULTS: Isograft controls survived indefinitely. All nontreated allografts rejected within 5 to 8 days posttransplant. Long-term survival was achieved in 100% of LBN (up to 400 days) and ACI (up to 330 days) recipients. At day 160, posttransplant donor-specific chimerism was present in recipients of LBN (10.14% CD4/RT1n, 6.38% CD8/RT1n, 10.02% CD45RA/RT1n) and ACI (17.54% CD4/RT1a, 9.28% CD8/RT1a) transplants, and mixed lymphocyte reaction confirmed tolerance in recipients of LBN transplants and moderate reactivity in recipients of ACI allografts. CONCLUSION: Operational tolerance was induced in hemiface allograft transplants across an MHC barrier under cyclosporine A monotherapy protocol. It was associated directly with the presence of multilineage donor-specific chimerism.     

Brief cyclosporine treatment prevents intrathymic (IT) tolerance induction and precipitates acute rejection in an IT rat cardiac allograft model

BACKGROUND: Intrathymic (IT) alloantigen combined with administration of rabbit anti-rat anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS) intraperitoneally induces donor-specific tolerance to rat cardiac transplants. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a brief course (4 days) of cyclosporine (CsA) on the development of IT tolerance. METHODS: Buffalo (BUF) (RT1b) rats were given 25x10(6) fully MHC-mismatched Lewis (LEW) (RT1l) splenocytes by IT injection plus 1.0 ml of ALS intraperitoneally. Twenty-one days later, IT donor-specific LEW (group 1) or third-party (ACI, RT1a) (group 2) hearts were heterotopically transplanted to the abdominal aorta A third group of BUF (group 3) were given daily CsA (10 mg/kg) by oral gavage for 4 days before administration of IT LEW cells and ALS. Rejection as defined by the cessation of a palpable heartbeat was confirmed by histology. Cytokine profiles of allografts from all groups were then analyzed using a multi-probe RNase protection assay. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of IT/ALS-treated BUF recipients not pretreated with CsA accepted LEW heart grafts for greater than 90 days. However, 86% of animals treated with CsA for 4 days before IT injection and ALS rejected allografts at 10.7+/-3.2 days. Third-party allografts (ACI) were uniformly rejected (7.0+/-0.0 days). Histology confirmed cellular rejection in CsA-treated allografts and cytokine analysis detected increased interleukin (IL)-3, IL-5, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha when compared to increased IL-2 and interferon-gamma in rejecting untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: CsA can prevent the induction of intrathymic alloantigen tolerance. These results support the development of a CsA-sensitive, but IL-2-independent, active regulatory mechanism after intrathymic exposure to donor-specific alloantigen and depletion of mature peripheral T cells.     

A novel CD154 monoclonal antibody in acute and chronic rat vascularized cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: The CD40-CD154 interaction is critically important in the cell-mediated immune responses. Blockade of this costimulatory pathway has been shown to prevent acute allograft rejection in murine, as well as nonhuman primate models. However, the role of the CD40-CD154 pathway in the development of chronic rejection and the effects of CD154 targeting on progression of chronic rejection have not been evaluated. METHODS: We examined the effect of AH.F5, a new hamster anti-rat CD154 monoclonal antibody, in a fully allogeneic acute(u) into Lewis [LEW] (RT11) and chronic [WF.1L (RT1l) into LEW (RT1l)] vascularized cardiac allograft rejection model. In the chronic model, the antibody was evaluated for prevention (starting day of transplant) and interruption of progression (starting day 30 or 60 after transplant) of chronic vasculopathy. Graft survival, morphology, and immunohistology were evaluated. RESULTS: In the acute rejection model, anti-CD154 therapy alone prevented acute allograft rejection and resulted in 50% long-term allograft survival (>200 days) and donor-specific tolerance. In recipients treated with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody in combination with a short course of cyclosporine, 100% of allografts survived long-term and all recipients achieved donor-specific tolerance. In the chronic rejection model, allografts from animals treated with the anti-CD154 antibody had a statistically significant lower score of graft arteriosclerosis and fibrosis in both the prevention and 30-day interruption groups when compared with control allografts. In addition, immunohistochemistry showed a decrease in intragraft mononuclear cell infiltration and activation. CONCLUSION: A new anti-CD154 antibody not only prevents acute allograft rejection, but also inhibits and interrupts the development of chronic rejection. In the acute rejection model cyclosporine acts synergistically with anti-CD154 therapy to prolong allograft survival and induce tolerance. In the chronic rejection model relatively early initiation of therapy is essential to prevent progression of chronic allograft vasculopathy and fibrosis.     

Sex-associated differences in the survival of skin grafts in rats. Enhancement of cyclosporine immunosuppression in male compared with female recipients

Focusing on sex-difference in prolongation of allograft survival time, we have performed skin grafts between fully allogeneic rat strains, AO (RT1u) and DA (RT1a) with an immunosuppressant, cyclosporine. Isografted skins survived indefinitely, whereas allografts were severely rejected at days 7-9 without immunosuppressive treatment. When adult male DA rats received CsA (15 mg/kg/day, i.m., for 14 days postoperatively), allogeneic skin was accepted from either male or female AO rats for 38.8 +/- 20.5 days (mean survival time [MST] +/- SD) and for 44.7 +/- 43.3 days (MST +/- SD), respectively, with normal hair growth at around day 17. Additional CsA administration every 5 days after the initial short course treatment was also effective in preventing chronic rejection. Male AO rat skin grafted onto adult male DA rats survived for over 50 days as long as the treatment was carried out. In contrast, when adult female DA rats were used as recipients, only a few days' prolongation was observed in comparison with a non-treated group. The rejection always occurred, even during the initial course of treatment (MST +/- SD): 10.9 +/- 1.6 days). Younger male DA recipients, 5 and 10 weeks old, rejected AO skin within a shorter time, depending on the age. The maximal graft survival was observed when male adult rats more than 14 weeks old were used as recipients. On the other hand, the CsA serum level of female recipients at day 14 was considerably lower than that of males. However, even when the level of females was adjusted to that of males by the administration of a double dosage (30 mg/kg/day), the female recipients consistently rejected the skins (MST +/- SD: 14.5 +/- 1.9 days). Therefore, these results clearly indicate that this male-associated immunosuppressive effect depends upon the sex and age of the recipient animals.     

Facial tissue allograft transplantation

A hemifacial allograft transplant model was used to investigate the rationale for development of functional tolerance across an MHC barrier. Thirty hemiface transplantations were performed in five groups of six Lewis (RT1(1)) rat recipients each. Isografts were performed in group 1. Transplants were obtained from semiallogenic LBN(RT1(1+n)) in group 2 and from fully allogenic ACI(RT1(a)) in group 3 donors, which served as allograft rejection controls. Group 4 grafts using LBN donors and group 5 using ACI donors in addition received CsA monotherapy (16 mg/kg/d for 1 week) and maintained at 2 mg/kg/d. Signs of graft rejection were sought daily. Isograft controls survived indefinitely. All nontreated allografts were rejected within 5 to 8 days posttransplant. Eighty-three percent of face-transplant recipients from LBN donors and 67% from ACI donors did not show any signs of rejection up to 270 days and 200 days, respectively. Flow cytometry at day 63 in LBN recipients showed the presence of donor-specific chimerism for MHC class I RT1(n) antigens, namely 3.39% CD4/RT1(n); 1.01% CD8/RT1(n) T-lymphocytes; and 3.54% CD45RA/RT1(n) B-lymphocytes. In ACI recipients the chimerism test revealed 10.55% CD4/RT1(a) and 4.59% of CD8/RT1(a) T-lymphocytes. MLR assay at day 160 posttransplant revealed suppressed responses against LBN donor antigens in group 4, but moderate reactivity to ACI donor antigens in group 5. Functional tolerance toward hemifacial allograft transplants induced across MHC barrier using a CsA monotherapy protocol was associated with the presence of donor-specific chimerism in T- and B-cell subpopulations.     

Role of thymus in operational tolerance induction in limb allograft transplant model

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the role of host thymus in tolerance induction in composite tissue allografts (CTA) across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barrier during a 7-day alphabeta- T-cell receptor (TCR)/ cyclosporine A (CsA) protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 62 limb allograft transplants were studied. Euthymic (group A) and thymectomized (group B) Lewis recipients (LEW, RT1(1)) received vascularized hind-limb allografts from hybrid Lewis x Brown-Norway (F1), (LBN, RT1(1+n)) donors. Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and skin grafting assessed donor-specific tolerance in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Flow cytometry determined the efficacy of immunosuppressive protocols and the presence of donor-specific chimerism. Immunocytochemistry revealed the presence of donor-specific cells in the lymphoid organs of recipients. RESULTS: Isograft transplants survived indefinitely. For thymectomized rats, the median survival time (MST) of limb allograft in non-treated recipients was 7 days; monotherapy with alphabeta-TCR extended MST to 16 days, and CsA therapy extended it to 30 days. Using the alphabeta-TCR/CsA protocol, the MST of allografts was 51 days. For euthymic rats, the MST of limb allograft in non-treated recipients was 7 days; monotherapy with alphabeta-TCR or CsA extended MST to 13 or 22 days, respectively. Treatment with alphabeta-TCR/CsA resulted in indefinite allografts survival (MST=370 days). MLR and skin grafting confirmed donor-specific tolerance in euthymic recipients. Flow cytometry showed stable chimerism in the euthymic rats and transient chimerism in thymectomized limb recipients. Immunoperoxidase staining revealed the persistence of donor-derived cells in the lymphoid tissues of euthymic recipients. CONCLUSION: We found that the presence of thymus was imperative for the induction of donor-specific tolerance in rat hind-limb composite tissue allografts using a alphabeta-TCR/CsA protocol.     

Donor-specific cellular immunity in rejecting and long-term-surviving class I-disparate rat renal allograft recipients

The effects of pre- and posttransplant immunization on graft survival, infiltrate intensity, and host in situ/systemic cellular immune responsiveness were examined for class I MHC-disparate rat renal allograft recipients. Naive, unsensitized PVG (RT1c) recipients of class I MHC disparate PVG.R1 (RT1.Aa on PVG background) orthotopic kidney transplants displayed long-term (greater than 50 days) survival (LTS) in a majority (41/52) of cases. Pretransplant immunization of recipients with a PVG.R1 skin graft most often resulted in rejection (mean survival greater than 21.3 days) with 8/15 rats surviving less than or equal to 2 weeks and only 3/15 with LTS. Pretransplant immunization with a skin graft from a fully MHC-disparate PVG.1A (RT1a on PVG background) donor resulted in acute rejection (mean = 6.1 days) with 0/8 rats surviving greater than or equal to 2 weeks. Donor-specific class I and II disparate (PVG.1A), and third-party (LEW) skin transplants applied on LTS (greater than 50 days) PVG.R1 kidney graft recipients showed typical 1st- and accelerated 2nd-set skin graft rejection, but had no effect on kidney graft survival. In contrast, 6/7 LTS PVG.R1 kidney graft recipients accepted PVG.R1 skin grafts indefinitely following their transient partial rejection. Histologic analysis of kidney allografts revealed the highest degree of mononuclear cell infiltrates in animals specifically sensitized by PVG.1A skin grafts prior to transplant. Donor class I-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor (pCTL) frequencies, as determined by limiting dilution assays, were increased and equivalent at 1 week posttransplant in kidney allograft cell eluates from nonrejecting naive recipients (1/127-1/2209) and rejecting presensitized animals (1/470-1/7848). LTS animals had decreased intragraft pCTL at greater than 50 days (1/2969-1/61875), as did LTS at greater than 50 days that received PVG.R1, PVG.1A, or LEW skin grafts posttransplant. In all groups, splenocyte pCTL frequencies were significantly lower than the corresponding values within the allograft. By comparison, no significant differences in intragraft or splenic proliferative T lymphocyte (pPTL) precursor frequencies were observed between any groups. These results indicate that unsensitized recipients of class I-disparate renal cells grafts are capable of maintaining graft survival in the early posttransplant period, despite the presence of significant in situ antidonor class I MHC-specific cellular immune responsiveness. These findings also indicate that long-surviving PVG recipients of class I-disparate renal allografts develop specific functional tolerance to donor class I alloantigens, that may be associated with a diminished frequency of anti-class I cytotoxic (but not proliferative) T cell precursors.     

Pretransplant conditioning with donor-specific transfusions using heated blood and cyclosporine. Preservation of the transfusion effect in the absence of sensitization

Previous studies from our laboratory showed that pretransplant conditioning with fresh donor-specific blood (DST) combined with cyclosporine (CsA) resulted in long-term prolongation of ACI heterotopic cardiac allografts in LEW recipients treated with subtherapeutic doses of CsA. The concomitant administration of CsA profoundly reduced but did not eliminate the DST-induced sensitization. The purpose of the present study was to investigate in the ACI-to-LEW cardiac allograft model whether heat-treatment of the blood would further reduce the sensitizing potential of DST while maintaining their benefits in our protocol. Fresh heparinized ACI blood was heated at 45 degrees C for 60 min. Then 1.5 ml was administered i.v. to LEW rats on day -8 with respect to grafting (day 0). Controls received heat-treated BUF blood. Donor heat-treated blood (HT-DST), unlike fresh blood, did not induce a humoral cytotoxic response and resulted in the prolongation of cardiac allograft survival (13.2 +/- 2.7 vs. 7.2 +/- 1.0; P less than 0.01). Treatment of HT-DST recipients with postoperative subtherapeutic doses of CsA (2.5 mg/kg/day x 30) extended graft survival (46.6 +/- 22.0 vs. 7.7 +/- 2.0 days; P less than 0.01). The combined pretransplant administration of HT-DST and CsA followed by posttransplant subtherapeutic doses of CsA led to long-term prolongation of cardiac grafts (122.0 +/- 73.0 vs. 31.7 +/- 22.0 days; P less than 0.01). These studies demonstrate that heat-treatment of allogeneic blood eliminates the humoral responses to DST and actually enhances their beneficial effects in terms of graft survival. Such effects can be dramatically increased by CsA. The possible mechanism of these phenomena are discussed.     

Long-term survival of cardiac allografts in lethally irradiated rats repopulated with host-type hemopoietic cells.

To test the hypothesis that hemopoietic cells within a tissue graft are responsible for its immunogenicity, two experimental protocols were followed. LEW hearts were grafted into (LEW X BN)F-1 host rats and LEW or F-1 lymphocytes were injected into the apex of the grafted heart. The LEW but not the F-1 cells induced a local reaction, apparently because the circulating F-1 cells were the necessary immunogens. The second protocol took advantage of the knowledge that lethally irradiated LEW rats were able to reject WF Ag-B-incompatible hemopoietic cells (but not tissue allografts) within a few days. LEW rats were lethally irradiated and grafted with WF hearts on day 0. A mixture of LEW marrow, thymus, spleen and lymph node cells, or marrow cells only were infused either on day 0 or day 2. Cardiac allografts in hosts repopulated with the mixture of lymphoid cells survived a mean of 11.3 days in hosts infused on day 0, but survived indefinitely if the lymphoid cells were infused on day 2. The 2-day interval also prolonged the survival of allografts in rats infused with only marrow cells. The long-term recipients, without any further treatment, rejected WF skin grafts as first-set reactions 1 year later but did not reject second WF cardiac allografts. Lymphoid cells from long-term recipients imparied the rejection of WF cardiac allografts by LEW host rats. The lack of rejection of the original cardiac allograft supported the hypothesis tested. Certain hemopoietic cells responsible for the immunogenicity of cardiac allografts were probably eliminated in the 2-day interval at least in part by host effector cells capable of rejecting allogeneic hemopoietic cells. However, the mechanism of long-term "unresponsiveness" to WF hearts could have been caused by loss of accessory cells during the 2-day interval followed by infusion of immunocompetent cells. Skin rejections in these recipients may have been attributable to reactions against skin differentiation-specific antigens.     

15AU81, a prostacyclin analog, enhances donor-specific hepatocytes to prolong the survival of rat heart but not small bowel allografts

Prostacyclin analogs have previously been shown to have not only cytoprotective but also independent immunosuppressive effects. The effect of one such analog, 15AU81, to enhance the immunosuppressive effects of liver was investigated. We have previously demonstrated that cyclosporine (CsA) in conjunction with rapamycin (RAPA) potentiates class I+, class II- donor-specific hepatocytes to prolong rat cardiac and small bowel allograft survival. Brown Norway (BN; RT1n) hepatocytes alone (5 x 10(7)/kg, administered intrasplenically) failed to prolong the survival of BN heart allografts in Wistar Furth (WFu; RT1u) recipients, beyond that of untreated controls (MST = 7.2 +/- 0.8 days). Survival of BN hearts was increased to 11.4 +/- 1.7 days in WFu recipients treated with BN hepatocytes and 50 microg/kg/day 15AU81 administered by continuous s.c. infusion for 14 days using osmotic pumps (p < 0.05). The further addition of RAPA 0.0075 mg/kg/day and CsA 0.375 mg/kg/day delivered for 14 days by continuous i.v. infusion (CIVI) using osmotic pumps (a combination that alone prolonged BN heart allografts in WFu hosts to 18.4 +/- 1.3 days and in conjunction with BN hepatocytes prolonged survival to 27.2 +/- 1.9 days) prolonged allograft survival to 35.2 +/- 5.2 days. In contrast, the survival of small bowel allografts was not enhanced by 15AU81 administration. Survival of BN small bowel transplants in LEW recipients treated with hepatocytes alone (MST = 11.6 +/- 1.5 days) or hepatocytes plus 15AU81 (MST = 10.0 +/- 1.0 days) was similar to controls (MST = 10.2 +/- 1.9 days). Treatment with hepatocytes and RAPA/CsA increased survival to 21.2 +/- 1.5 days. The further addition of 15AU81 failed to augment this (MST = 17.0 +/- 1.9 days). In vitro WFu lymphocyte proliferative responses from animals pretreated with BN hepatocytes, 15AU81, or both treatments, for 2 weeks prior to harvesting, exhibited a reduction of at least 50%, compared to untreated controls upon allostimulation with irradiated BN or ACI spleen cells. These findings demonstrate that 15AU81 interacts favorably with hepatocytes either alone or in conjunction with RAPA and CsA to enhance their immunosuppressive effects on rat heart allograft survival. The failure to enhance small bowel allograft survival may be explained by the inability at this low dosage of 15AU81 to influence the intense graft versus host reaction elicited by small bowel transplants.     

Successful intestinal transplantation in pigs treated with cyclosporine

To date, it has not been possible to reliably prevent intestinal allograft rejection in large animals. This study was undertaken to determine if continuous i.v. cyclosporine (CsA) followed by p.o. CsA would prevent rejection in outbred piglets with orthotopic, in-continuity intestinal allografts. Untreated recipients (n = 7) died of rejection (2), interstitial pnuemontitis (3), or technical complications (2) at 5.3 +/- 1 days. Intestinal recipients treated with i.v. CsA 8 mg/kg/day and i.v. steroids (n = 3) died of rejection (mean survival 11.3 +/- 3.2 days). CsA 20 mg/kg/day i.v. plus i.v. steroids for 21 days, followed by p.o. CsA 25 mg/kg/day (n = 6) prevented rejection; however, most of the recipients developed fatal infections (mean survival 28 +/- 8 days). Intravenous CsA 15 mg/kg/day for 7-10 days (n = 16), followed by p.o. CsA 30 mg/kg/day in tapering doses reliably prevented graft rejection, permitting long-term survival (mean survival 121 +/- 32 days). Rejection did not occur in 7 animals when CsA was discontinued at 97 +/- 11 days. Seven animals surviving more than 100 days maintained normal nutritional indices and gained weight at the same rate as control animals. This study provides a rationale for further experimentation to determine the feasibility of intestinal transplantation in man.     

The synergistic effect of low-dose cyclosporine and fluocinolone acetonide on the survival of rat allogeneic skin grafts

Both CsA and topical FA can prolong the survival of skin allografts under the proper conditions. This study was performed to determine if there is a synergistic effect between these two compounds. Buf (RT1b) rat split-thickness skin grafts were transplanted onto the backs of Lew (RT1l) rats. The MST for the control group was 9.89 +/- 0.35 days. In rats given oral CsA, 2.5 or 5 mg/kg, daily from the second day of grafting, the MST was 16.0 +/- 1.9 and 13.6 +/- 0.4 days (blood CsA levels were 166 +/- 20 and 640 +/- 32 ng/ml at the time of rejection, respectively. Topical FA applied daily beginning 72 hr after grafting resulted in a MST of 24.1 +/- 3.6 days. When both topical FA and 5 mg/kg oral CsA were used, the allograft survival time was more than 100 days in 4 of 7 animals. When oral CsA 2.5 mg/kg was combined with topical CsA and FA, the allograft rejection was delayed until 50 days postgrafting in four of six animals. The synergistic effects of oral CsA and topical FA is significant, and thus allows for the use of a subtherapeutic dosage of each compound and provides a potentially safe means for prolonging skin allograft survival.     

Induction of tolerance to hind limb allografts in rats receiving cyclosporine A and antilymphocyte serum: effect of duration of the treatment

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the ability of antilymphocyte serum (ALS) and cyclosporine A (CsA) to induce tolerance for hind limb composite tissue allograft in rats without chronic immunosuppression. METHODS: Hind limb transplantations were performed in Lewis-Brown-Norway (LBN, RT1(1+n)) and Lewis (LEW, RT1(1)) rats. Treatment consisted of ALS only (0.4 mL/kg), CsA only (16 mg/kg), and a combination of CsA and ALS, and it was administered 12 hr before surgery at three different intervals (7, 14, and 21 days). Long-term survivors were tested for tolerance by standard skin grafting from the recipient (LEW), the donor (LBN), and the third party (ACI, RT1 ) 60 days after cessation of the treatment and by mixed lymphocyte reaction at 100 days. T-cell lines were analyzed with flow cytometry. RESULTS: Single use of ALS in all treatment intervals did not prolong allograft survival. Single use of CsA extended survival up to 23 days in the 21-day protocol group. CsA and ALS caused indefinite survival in two of six rats in the 14-day protocol and in all six rats in the 21-day protocol (>420 days). The six long-term survivors in the 21-day protocol accepted the skin grafts from the donor (LBN) and the recipient (LEW) and rejected third-party grafts (ACI). Tolerant animals showed a donor-specific hematopoietic chimerism of 35% to 42% in the peripheral blood. Mixed lymphocyte reaction assay demonstrated tolerance to the host and donor alloantigens and increased response to the third party. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of CsA and ALS for 21 days induced donor-specific tolerance in the recipients of the rat hind limb composite tissue allografts. The mechanism of tolerance should be investigated further.