The effect of acipimox in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent hyperlipidaemia.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind study was performed to assess the effect of 12 weeks treatment with acipimox (250 mg three times per day) on lipoproteins and glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All patients studied had persistent hyperlipidaemia despite acceptable glycaemic control on treatment with diet alone or diet and oral hypoglycaemic agents, achieving glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) of less than 10.5% but with fasting total triglycerides greater than 2.5 mmol l-1 or total cholesterol greater than 6.5 mmol l-1. Forty-eight patients were randomized to treatment, 21 to acipimox and 27 to placebo; 43 completed the trial. All patients had been diabetic for at least 1 year. Total cholesterol fell by 6% and total triglycerides by 19% following 12 weeks of acipimox, compared to rises in the placebo group of 1% and 16%, respectively (p less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between acipimox and placebo in the change in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoproteins AI, AII, or B, or in glycaemic control during the treatment period. Acipimox is effective in reducing fasting total cholesterol and total triglycerides in patients with Type 2 diabetes with acceptable blood glucose control but persistent hyperlipidaemia. Acipimox does not adversely affect glucose tolerance.     

A randomized trial of insulin aspart with intensified basal NPH insulin supplementation in people with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: Insulin aspart has been shown to improve post-prandial and overall glycaemic control in people with Type 1 diabetes. We hypothesized that insulin aspart with intensified basal NPH insulin supplementation would result in better overall glycaemic control than human regular insulin with standard basal NPH insulin. METHODS: The trial was conducted in 43 centres in seven countries. People with Type 1 diabetes were randomized to mealtime insulin aspart with up to four daily NPH doses if meals were > 5 h apart and a 25% increase in bedtime NPH dose (n = 187), or to mealtime human unmodified insulin with once or twice daily basal NPH insulin (n = 181). Efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12 weeks (primary evaluation period) and 64 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 and 64 weeks there was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between the insulin aspart and regular insulin groups: -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23, +0.05)% and -0.14 (-0.32, +0.04)%. Post-prandial glucose values were lower and the area under the 24-h self-monitored blood glucose curve above 7.0 mmol/l was 28% smaller with insulin aspart (35.2 +/- 3.2 vs. 48.9 +/- 3.1 mmol/l h, P = 0.0015). No significant differences were found in mild or severe hypoglycaemia, or adverse event rate. At 64 weeks treatment satisfaction was higher in the insulin aspart group (difference 1.57 (95% CI 0.49, 2.64) points, P = 0.004), while quality of life was not different. CONCLUSIONS: Improved post-prandial glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart were confirmed. Intensifying basal insulin supplementation resulted in a similar HbA1c decrement as previously found with the use of insulin aspart and standard NPH insulin supplementation. This does not support routinely basal NPH insulin intensification when using rapid-acting insulin analogues in daily practice.     

A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study.

AIMS: Insulin is generally withheld until people with Type 2 diabetes are unresponsive to other therapies. However, its potential advantages suggest that it could be added earlier to achieve glycaemic goals; this possibility was tested in a clinical trial. METHODS: Consenting adults aged 18-80 years with Type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, HbA1c of 7.5-11%, and on 0, 1 or 2 oral agents, were randomized to one of two therapeutic approaches for 24 weeks: evening insulin glargine plus self-titration by 1 unit/day if the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was > 5.5 mmol/l; or conventional therapy with physician adjustment of oral glucose-lowering agents if capillary FPG levels were > 5.5 mmol/l. The primary outcome was the first achievement of two consecutive HbA1c levels 相似文献   

Sustained effects of pioglitazone vs. glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, and lipid profiles in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: This study compared the effects of 52 weeks' treatment with pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione that reduces insulin resistance, and glibenclamide, on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, and lipids in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either pioglitazone (initially 30 mg QD, n = 91) or micronized glibenclamide (initially 1.75 mg QD, n = 109) as monotherapy. Doses were titrated (to 45 mg for pioglitazone and 10.5 mg for glibenclamide) to achieve glycaemic targets during the next 12 weeks: fasting blood glucose of < or = 7 mmol/l and 1-h postprandial blood glucose of < or = 10 mmol/l. Patients were maintained on the titrated dose for 40 weeks. RESULTS: Pioglitazone significantly increased insulin sensitivity compared with glibenclamide, as assessed by homeostasis model assessment (17.0% vs. -13.0%; P < 0.001), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (0.011 vs. -0.007; P < 0.001) and fasting serum insulin (-1.3 pmol/l vs. 23.8 pmol/l; P = 0.007). The glibenclamide group had significantly lower HbA1c than the pioglitazone group after 12 weeks of therapy (7.8% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.015), but significantly higher HbA1c after 52 weeks of therapy (7.8% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.001). Pioglitazone significantly (vs. glibenclamide) increased mean HDL-C (P < 0.001), decreased mean triglycerides (P = 0.019), and decreased mean atherogenic index of plasma (AIP; P = 0.001) and mean total cholesterol/HDL-C (P = 0.004), without significantly elevating mean total cholesterol or mean LDL-C compared with glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that the effects of pioglitazone are more sustained than those of glibenclamide for improving insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 diabetes, and that 52 weeks' treatment with pioglitazone has favourable effects on glycaemic control and lipoprotein profile.     

The Efficacy of Ginseng-Related Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Few randomized clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of ginseng in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The current meta-analysis evaluated the ginseng-induced improvement in glucose control and insulin sensitivity in patients with type-2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance.Randomized clinical trials comparing ginseng supplementation versus control, in patients with T2DM or impaired glucose tolerance, were hand-searched from Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases by 2 independent reviewers using the terms “type 2 diabetes/diabetes/diabetic, impaired glucose tolerance, and ginseng/ginsenoside(s).” The primary outcome analyzed was the change in HbA1c, whereas the secondary outcomes included fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, fasting insulin, postprandial insulin, insulin resistance Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), and high density lipoprotein (HDL).Of the 141 studies identified, 8 studies were chosen for the current meta-analysis. The average number of patients, age, and sex distribution among the groups were comparable. Results reveal no significant difference in HbA1c levels between the ginseng supplementation and the control groups (pooled standardized difference in means = −0.148, 95% CI: −0.637 to 0.228, P = 0.355). Ginseng supplementation improved fasting glucose, postprandial insulin, and HOMA-IR levels, though no difference in postprandial glucose or fasting insulin was observed among the groups. Similarly, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL levels showed significant difference between the treatment groups, while no difference in HDL was seen. In addition, ginseng-related therapy was ineffective in decreasing the fasting glucose levels in patients treated with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin.The present results establish the benefit of ginseng supplementation in improving glucose control and insulin sensitivity in patients with T2DM or impaired glucose intolerance.     

Rosiglitazone in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evaluation in British Indo-Asian patients.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of rosiglitazone in reducing hyperglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) of Indo-Asian origin taking concurrent sulphonylurea therapy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 26 weeks' duration at 31 primary and secondary care centres in areas of the UK with a high Indo-Asian population, including 177 patients aged 28-78 years. Rosiglitazone 8 mg/day or matching placebo was added to existing sulphonylurea therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 26. RESULTS: The mean changes in HbA1c were -1.16% with rosiglitazone (baseline 9.21%) and +0.26% with placebo (baseline 9.06%) (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.81, -1.08). HbA1c fell below 8% in 55% and 19% of patients, respectively (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.22, 0.51). The greatest improvements occurred in patients whose glycaemic control was initially poor. Improvements in homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell function with rosiglitazone were not accompanied by a change in plasma insulin or C-peptide after 26 weeks. Free fatty acids fell by 0.09 mmol/l with rosiglitazone and increased by 0.03 mmol/l with placebo (treatment difference P < 0.001; 95% CI -0.19, -0.07). CONCLUSION: Rosiglitazone improved insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta-cell function, and glycaemic control in Indo-Asian patients with Type 2 DM who are at greater risk of the complications of Type 2 DM than other ethnic groups.     

Ethnicity and glycaemic control are major determinants of diabetic dyslipidaemia in Malaysia.

AIMS: To define the prevalence of dyslipidaemia in young diabetic patients in Peninsular Malaysia and the contributory factors of dyslipidaemia in these subjects. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study involving 848 young diabetic patients from seven different centres, with representation from the three main ethnic groups. Clinical history and physical examination was done and blood taken for HbA1c, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. RESULTS: The overall lipids were suboptimal, worse in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients compared with Type 1 DM patients. Of the Type 2 patients, 73.2% had total cholesterol > 5.20 mmol/l, 90.9% had LDL-cholesterol > 2.60 mmol/l, 52.6% had HDL-cholesterol < 1.15 mmol/l and 27.3% had serum triglycerides > 2.30 mmol/l. There were ethnic differences in the lipid levels with the Malays having the highest total cholesterol (mean 6.19 mmol/l), and the highest LDL-cholesterol (mean 4.16 mmol/l), while the Chinese had the highest HDL-cholesterol (geometric mean 1.24 mmol/l). Ethnicity was an important determinant of total, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol in Type 2 DM, and LDL- and HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in Type 1 DM. Glycaemic control was an important determinant of total, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in both Type 1 and Type 2 DM. Waist-hip ratio (WHR) was an important determinant of HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in both types of DM. Gender was an important determinant of HDL-cholesterol in Type 2 DM, but not in Type 1 DM. Socioeconomic factors and diabetes care facilities did not have any effect on the dyslipidaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of dyslipidaemia was high especially in Type 2 DM patients. Ethnicity, glycaemic control, WHR, and gender were important determinants of dyslipidaemia in young diabetic patients. Diabet. Med. 18, 501-508 (2001)     

The use of low glycaemic index foods improves metabolic control of diabetic patients over five weeks.

The aim of the present study was to determine whether any benefit might occur from lowering the glycaemic index of diet in the medium term in diabetic patients. Eighteen well-controlled diabetic patients (12 Type 1 and 6 Type 2 non-insulin-treated), were assigned to either a high mean glycaemic index or low mean glycaemic index diet for 5 weeks each in a random order using a cross-over design. The two diets were equivalent in terms of nutrient content and total and soluble fibre content. The glycaemic indices were 64 +/- 2 (mean +/- SD) % and 38 +/- 5% for the two diets. The high glycaemic index diet was enriched in bread and potato and the low glycaemic index diet in pasta, rice, and legumes. At the end of the study periods, the following variables were improved on the low compared to the high glycaemic index diet: fructosamine (3.9 +/- 0.9 vs 3.4 +/- 0.4 mmol l-1, p less than 0.05); fasting blood glucose (10.8 +/- 2.8 vs 9.6 +/- 2.7 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); 2-h postprandial blood glucose (11.6 +/- 2.9 vs 10.3 +/- 2.5 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); mean daily blood glucose (12.0 +/- 2.5 vs 10.4 +/- 2.7 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02); serum triglycerides (1.5 +/- 0.9 vs 1.2 +/- 0.6 mmol l-1, p less than 0.05). No significant differences were found in body weight, HbA1C, insulin binding to erythrocytes, insulin and drug requirements, and other circulating lipids (cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, phospholipids, Apolipoprotein A1, Apolipoprotein B). Thus the inclusion of low glycaemic index foods in the diet of diabetic patients may be an additional measure which slightly but favourably influences carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, requires only small changes in nutritional habits and has no known deleterious effects.     

Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in managing hypertriglyceridemia in type-2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

Background and aimsSaroglitazar is commonly used in India for managing hypertriglyceridemia in diabetes. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in hypertriglyceridemia.MethodsElectronic databases were searched for RCTs involving diabetes patients receiving saroglitazar in intervention arm, and placebo/lipid/diabetes medication in the control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate change in serum triglyceride and HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in other lipid parameters, glycaemia and adverse effects. Analysis for lipid and glycaemic parameters were done separately for controls receiving anti-lipid medications (statins/fibrates) [active control group (ACG)] and those receiving placebo/diabetes medications [passive control group (PCG)].ResultsFollowing 12 weeks therapy, individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower triglycerides when compared to PCG [MD -71.67 mg/dl (95% CI: −123.67 to −19.66 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I² = 91% (considerable heterogeneity); low certainty of evidence (LCE)], but not ACG [MD -37.38 mg/dl (95% CI: −84.55–9.79 mg/dl; P = 0.12; I² = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. Individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower fasting glucose when compared to PCG [MD -24.61 mg/dl (95% CI: −44.13 to −5.09 mg/dl); P = 0.01; I² = 65% (moderate heterogeneity); LCE], but not ACG [MD -13.5 mg/dl (95% CI: −33.1–6.10 mg/dl; P = 0.18; I² = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein-B and HDL-C were not significantly different among study groups. Creatinine was significantly higher in patients receiving saroglitazar as compared to controls [MD 0.12 mg/dl (95% CI: 0.04–0.21 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I² = 29% (low heterogeneity); high certainty of evidence].ConclusionThis meta-analysis reinforces the excellent triglyceride lowering of saroglitazar, but highlights significant increase in creatinine.     

Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: This study compared the effect of insulin detemir on glycaemic control (HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose and variability thereof) with that of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn human isophane (NPH) insulin, both combined with insulin aspart, in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and compared the safety of these treatments. METHODS: In this 26-week, open-label, randomized (2 : 1), parallel-group study, 347 (140 prepubertal and 207 pubertal) children with Type 1 diabetes, aged 6-17 years, received insulin detemir (n = 232) or NPH insulin (n = 115) once or twice daily, according to the prestudy regimen, plus premeal insulin aspart. RESULTS: The mean HbA(1c) decreased by approximately 0.8% with both treatments. After 26 weeks, the mean difference in HbA(1c) was 0.1% (95% confidence interval -0.1, 0.3) (insulin detemir 8.0%, NPH insulin 7.9%). Within-subject variation in self-measured fasting plasma glucose was significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (SD 3.3 vs. 4.3, P < 0.001), as was mean fasting plasma glucose (8.4 vs. 9.6 mmol/l, P = 0.022). The risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (22.00-07.00 h) was 26% lower with insulin detemir (P = 0.041) and the risk of 24-h hypoglycaemia was similar with the two treatments (P = 0.351). The mean body mass index (BMI) Z-score was lower with insulin detemir (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir or NPH insulin and premeal insulin aspart in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus improved HbA(1c) to a similar degree. The lower and more predictable fasting plasma glucose, lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and lower BMI observed with insulin detemir are clinically significant advantages compared with NPH insulin.     

Histidine‐containing dipeptides reduce central obesity and improve glycaemic outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Supplementation with histidine‐containing dipeptides has been shown to improve obesity and glycaemic outcomes in animal and human studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials to examine these effects. Electronic databases were searched investigating the effects of histidine‐containing dipeptides supplementation on anthropometric and glycaemic outcomes. Meta‐analyses were performed using random‐effects models to calculate the weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval. There were 30 studies for the systematic review and 23 studies pooled for meta‐analysis. Histidine‐containing dipeptide groups had a lower waist circumference (WMD [95% CI] = ?3.53 cm [?5.65, ?1.41], p = 0.001) and HbA1c level (WMD [95% CI] = ?0.76% (8.5 mmol/mol) [?1.29% (14.3 mmol/mol), ?0.24% (2.8 mmol/mol)], p = 0.004) at follow‐up compared with controls. In sensitivity analyses of studies with low risk of bias, waist circumference, HbA1c, and fasting glucose levels (WMD [95% CI] = ?0.63 mmol/L [?1.09, ?0.18], p = 0.006) were significantly lower in intervention groups versus controls. There was also a trend toward lower fat mass (p = 0.09), insulin resistance (p = 0.07), and higher insulin secretion (p = 0.06) in intervention versus control groups. Supplementation with histidine‐containing dipeptides may reduce central obesity and improve glycaemic outcomes. Further studies exploring histidine‐containing dipeptide use in obesity and diabetes prevention and treatment are warranted.     

Colestilan monotherapy significantly improves glycaemic control and LDL cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled study

Aim: To evaluate the plasma glucose‐reducing activity and safety of colestilan, a bile acid sequestrant, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Patients with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 7.2–11.1 mmol/l and HbA _1c≥7.0% were randomly allocated in double‐blind manner to receive colestilan or placebo therapy for 12 weeks. Results: A total of 183 patients entered the double‐blind treatment phase. At 12 weeks, colestilan significantly reduced HbA _1c and FPG vs. placebo by 0.9% and 1.2 mmol/l respectively (both p < 0.001). A significant (p < 0.001) 22.5% reduction of LDL cholesterol was also observed in the 172 patients evaluated (colestilan group: n = 86; placebo group: n = 86). However, no significant reduction of fasting insulin was observed (p = 0.087). No incidence of hypoglycaemia was reported in this study. Conclusion: Colestilan improved glycaemic control and reduced LDL cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Improved glycaemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro: a multicentre, randomized, cross-over trial in people with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare blood glucose control using insulin glargine + insulin lispro with that on NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin in adults with Type 1 diabetes managed with a multiple injection regimen. METHODS: In this 32-week, five-centre, two-way cross-over study, people with Type 1 diabetes (n = 56, baseline HbA1c 8.0 +/- 0.8%) were randomized to evening insulin glargine + mealtime insulin lispro or to NPH insulin (once- or twice-daily) + mealtime unmodified human insulin. Each 16-week period concluded with a 24-h inpatient plasma glucose profile. RESULTS: HbA1c was lower with glargine + lispro than with NPH + human insulin [7.5 vs. 8.0%, difference -0.5 (95% CI -0.7, -0.3) %, P < 0.001]. This was confirmed by an 8% lower 24-h plasma glucose area under the curve (AUC) (187 vs. 203 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.037), a 24% reduction in plasma glucose AUC > 7.0 mmol/l1 (47 vs. 62 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.017) and a 15% lower post-prandial plasma glucose AUC (75 vs. 88 mmol l(-1) h(-1), P = 0.002). There was no reduction in night-time plasma glucose AUC or increase in plasma glucose area < 3.5 mmol/l. Monthly rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reduced by 44% with glargine + lispro (0.66 vs. 1.18 episodes/month, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NPH insulin + unmodified human insulin, the combination of insulin glargine with a rapid-acting insulin analogue as multiple-injection therapy for Type 1 diabetes improves overall glycaemic control as assessed by HbA1c and 24-h plasma glucose monitoring to a clinically significant degree, together with a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycaemia.     

The combination of fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin predicts type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers

OBJECTIVES: We examined the usefulness of the combined use of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) levels to predict the progression of diabetes in a Japanese population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1995 to 2002 among 449 non-diabetic Japanese workers, ages 23-65, in whom baseline FPG levels and HbA1c were measured. Subjects were classified into six groups according to their baseline FPG level: low normal fasting glucose (NFG) (<5.55 mmol/l); high NFG (5.55-6.09 mmol/l); or impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (6.10-6.99 mmol/l), in combination with baseline HbA1c level: low HbA1c (<5.8%) and high HbA1c (> or =5.8%). The cumulative incidence of diabetes in 2002, as defined by the 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria, was compared between groups. RESULTS: The overall cumulative incidence of diabetes was 3.8% (17/449). The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 0.6% (2/339) in those with low NFG/normal HbA1c; 0% (0/24) with low NFG/high HbA1c; 6.4% (3/47) with high NFG/normal HbA1c; 23.1% (3/13) with high NFG/high HbA1c; 17.6% (3/17) with IFG/normal HbA1c; and 66.7% (9/17) with IFG/high HbA1c. The odds ratios for diabetes, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and family history of diabetes, were 5.3 (95% CI, 3.0-9.3) and 3.0 (1.7-5.3), per 0.56 mmol/l increase in FPG and 0.5% increase in HbA1c, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of FPG and HbA1c levels predicts the progression to diabetes in individuals with no apparent risk. In particular, the combination is recommended for individuals with a FPG > or =5.55 mmol/l.     

Achievement of glycaemic control is associated with improvements in lipid profile with iGlarLixi versus iGlar: A post hoc analysis of the LixiLan-L trial

Diabetic dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis. Glycaemic treatments that improve dyslipidaemia may help reduce the burden of atherosclerosis. This analysis investigated the effect of iGlarLixi [insulin glargine U100 (iGlar) and lixisenatide] versus iGlar on lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin. Data from LixiLan-L were used to estimate changes in fasting lipid levels from baseline to week 30, overall and in patients stratified by achievement of glycaemic targets {2-hour postprandial glucose [≤10, >10 mmoL/L], fasting plasma glucose [≤6.1, >6.1 mmoL/L], HbA1c [≤7, >7% (≤53, >53 mmol/mol)]}. At week 30, median percentage change in triglycerides remained nearly unchanged (0.3% increase) with iGlarLixi versus a 6.5% increase with iGlar (P = 0.035; overall); similarly, trends towards better total and LDL cholesterol levels were observed with iGlarLixi versus iGlar. In patient subgroups achieving glycaemic targets, all lipid variables except for HDL cholesterol improved with iGlarLixi but not with iGlar. In summary, patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin showed improved fasting lipid profiles with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar, particularly when achieving glycaemic targets.     

Impact of cigarette smoking on the incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged Japanese men: the Osaka Health Survey.

AIMS: To assess the impact of cigarette smoking on the incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in middle-aged Japanese men. METHODS: The study enrolled 6250 men aged 35-60 years and free of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose and hypertension at entry. Type 2 DM was defined by a fasting plasma glucose level > or =7.0 mmol/l or physician-diagnosed Type 2DM. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty cases of Type 2 DM were confirmed during the 60904 person-years follow-up. After adjustment for multiple covariates, including age, body mass index, alcohol consumption, physical activity, parental history of diabetes and the level of fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and haematocrit, the relative risk of Type 2 DM among current smokers compared with non-smokers was 1.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.92). Men who smoked >30 cigarettes/day had a multivariate-relative risk of 1.73 (95% CI 1.20-2.48) compared with non-smokers. The number of cigarettes smoked daily and the pack-year values were positively related to the development of Type 2 DM in a dose-dependent manner (P for trends = 0.0026 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A cigarette smoking habit is an independent risk factor for Type 2 DM.     

Relationship between HbA1c and indices of glucose tolerance derived from a standardized meal test in newly diagnosed treatment naive subjects with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To determine the relationship between HbA1c and other indices of glycaemic status derived during a standardized meal tolerance test (MTT) in newly diagnosed treatment-naive subjects with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: T2DM subjects (n = 262) consumed a standard MTT in the morning after a 10-h overnight fast. Frequent samples for plasma glucose (PG) were collected over the 4-h test period. The relationship between HbA1c and other glycaemic indices derived from the MTT were explored. The postprandial glucose exposure was calculated as the area under the incremental plasma glucose curve above the fasting level for the test period (AUC1). Excess hyperglycaemia was calculated as the AUC0-4 h above the arbitrary PG concentrations of 6.0 mmol/l (AUC2) and 5.5 mmol/l (AUC3), respectively [upper limit of fasting normoglycaemia according to World Health Organization (WHO) and American Diabetes Association (ADA), respectively]. Fasting hyperglycaemia was also estimated, being the difference between each of the above and the postprandial excursion. The participants were divided into three subgroups according to HbA1c (Group 1, 9.0%) and the relative contribution calculated of the postprandial glucose and fasting hyperglycaemia to the excess hyperglycaemia above the designated international thresholds for fasting plasma glucose. RESULTS: HbA1c was more strongly correlated with the fasting plasma glucose (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) than the overall postprandial glucose exposure (r = 0.539, P = 0.003). The contribution of fasting hyperglycaemia to excess hyperglycaemia using the WHO criteria for normal fasting plasma glucose for the three groups (Groups 1, 2 and 3) was 50.4%, 54.3% and 69.8%, respectively, and 57.8%, 58.8% and 71.4% using the ADA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of fasting hyperglycaemia to excess hyperglycaemia increases as glycaemic control deteriorates, becoming dominant with an HbA1c in excess of 7.0%. These findings indicate which therapeutic approach needs to be adopted based on the HbA1c of the person with T2DM.     

The effect of long-term glycaemic control on serum lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To examine whether long-term glycaemic control affects lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Eighty-nine Type 2 diabetic patients (38 men, 51 women) were recruited from the diabetes clinic. Based on HbA1c concentrations at baseline, patients were divided into two groups: those with HbA1c < 8.0% (n =45) and those with HbA1c > or = 8.0% (n=44). Comparisons of Lp(a) levels were made between both groups. The effect of long-term glycaemic control on Lp(a) levels was investigated in a subgroup of 20 patients, selected from those with baseline HbA1c > or = 8%. All these patients were treated with a goal of HbA1c <7%. RESULTS: Lp(a) levels were not significantly different between those with HbA1c< 8.0% and those with HbA1c, > or = 8.0%. No correlation between Lp(a) and HbA1c or fasting blood glucose levels was noted in diabetic patients as a whole. After 2 years of intensive glycaemic control, all patients exhibited remarkable improvement of therapy: their average HbA1c levels were 6.5 +/- 0.7%, being < 7% in 70% of patients. However, no change in Lp(a) levels were observed after 2 years (19.5 +/- 14.8-21.4 +/- 13.4 mg/dl, P = 0.390). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that improvement of glycaemic control does not affect serum Lp(a) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Effects of three months' diet after diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes on plasma lipids and lipoproteins (UKPDS 45). UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

AIMS: To assess the effect of diet on fasting plasma lipids and lipoproteins in patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 2,906 patients each underwent 3 months' diet therapy before allocation to therapy in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lipids and lipoproteins were measured at diagnosis and after 3 months' diet. RESULTS: The mean body weight at diagnosis was 83 kg. Weight decreased after diet by a mean of 4.5 kg; body mass index (BMI) decreased by 1.51 kg/m2; plasma glucose fell by 3 mmol/l from 11 mmol/l; and HbA1c by 2% from 9%. Triglyceride concentrations were reduced in men by -0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.47 to - 0.35) mmol/l from a geometric mean 1.8 (1 SD interval 1.0-3.0) mmol/l, and in women by -0.23 (-0.28 to -0.18) mmol/l from a similar level. Cholesterol decreased in men by -0.28 (-0.33 to -0.24) mmol/l from 5.5 (1.1) mmol/l, and in women by -0.09 (-0.14 to -0.04) mmol/l from 5.8 (1.2) mmol/l with corresponding changes in LDL cholesterol. HDL cholesterol increased in men by 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04) mmol/l and in women by 0.01 (0 to 0.02) mmol/l. Triglyceride concentration in the top tertile was reduced by 37% in men (> 2.1 mmol/l) and by 23% in women (> 2.2 mmol/l) with regression to mean accounting for 13% and 6%, respectively. Similarly cholesterol in the top tertile was reduced by 12% in men (> 5.8 mmol/l) and 7% in women (> 6.2 mmol/l) with 6% of the decrease in both men and women accounted for by regression to the mean. CONCLUSIONS: Initial dietary therapy in patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes substantially reduced plasma triglyceride, marginally improved total cholesterol and subfractions, and resulted in a potentially less atherogenic profile, although this did not eliminate the excess cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Effects of liraglutide (NN2211), a long-acting GLP-1 analogue, on glycaemic control and bodyweight in subjects with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Liraglutide (NN2211) is a long-acting GLP-1 analogue, with a pharmacokinetic profile suitable for once-daily administration. This multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy study explored the dose-response relationship of liraglutide effects on bodyweight and glycaemic control in subjects with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Subjects (BMI 27-42 kg/m(2)) with Type 2 diabetes who were previously treated with an OAD (oral anti-diabetic drug) monotherapy (69% with metformin), and had HbA(1c) < or = 10% were enrolled. After a 4-week metformin run-in period, 210 subjects (27-73 years, 60% female) were randomised to receive liraglutide (0.045-0.75 mg) once daily or continued on metformin 1000 mg b.d. for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Mean baseline values for the six treatment groups ranged from 6.8 to 7.5% for HbA(1c), and 8.06-9.44 mmol/l (145-170 mg/dl) for fasting plasma glucose. After 12-week treatment, a weight change of -0.05 to -1.9% was observed for the six treatment groups. Mean HbA(1c) changes from baseline for 0.045, 0.225, 0.45, 0.6, 0.75 mg liraglutide and metformin were +1.28%, +0.86%, +0.22%, +0.16%, +0.30% and +0.09%, respectively. No significant differences in HbA(1c) were observed between liraglutide and metformin groups at the three highest liraglutide dose levels (0.45, 0.6 and 0.75 mg). The lowest two liraglutide doses (0.045 mg and 0.225 mg) were not sufficient to maintain the fasting plasma glucose values achieved by metformin. No major hypoglycaemic episodes were reported. Episodes of nausea and/or vomiting were reported by 11 patients (6.3%) receiving liraglutide and three (8.8%) receiving metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily liraglutide improved glycaemic control and weight, in a comparable degree to metformin. Liraglutide appeared to be safe and generally well tolerated. Higher doses of liraglutide merit study in future clinical trials.