Esophageal resection for achalasia: indications and results

Although esophagomyotomy is highly effective as the initial surgical treatment of most patients with achalasia, those with either recurrent symptoms after a previous esophagomyotomy or a megaesophagus do not respond as well to esophagomyotomy. Total thoracic esophagectomy was performed in 26 patients (average age, 49 years) with achalasia. Eighteen had a history of a previous esophagomyotomy, and 18 had a megaesophagus (esophageal diameter of 8 cm or larger). In 24 patients, a transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy was the operative approach; 2 patients required a transthoracic esophagectomy because of intrathoracic adhesions from prior operations. The stomach was used as the esophageal substitute in all patients; it was positioned in the posterior mediastinum, and a cervical anastomosis was performed. Intraoperative blood loss averaged 765 mL. Major postoperative complications included mediastinal bleeding requiring thoracotomy (2), chylothorax (2), and anastomotic leak (1). There were no postoperative deaths. The average postoperative hospital stay was ten days. Follow-up is complete and ranges from 3 to 91 months (average duration, 30 months). All but 1 patient with severe psychiatric disease eat a regular, unrestricted diet without postprandial regurgitation. Early postoperative anastomotic dilation was required in 10 patients. Dumping syndrome has occurred in 5 patients. It is concluded that esophagectomy provides the most reliable treatment of esophageal obstruction, pulmonary complications, and potential late development of carcinoma in the patient with a megaesophagus of achalasia or a failed prior esophagomyotomy and that it is a far better option in these patients than esophagomyotomy, cardioplasty procedures, or limited esophageal resection.     

Chylothorax after thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Among 30 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer, from July 1995 to May 1997, chylothorax developed in 2 patients (7%). In Case 1, the ligation of the thoracic duct under conventional right thoracotomy was performed on the 9th day after esophagectomy. After ligation, the pleural effusion was decreased, and the patient was discharged from hospital on the 25th day after the second operation. In Case 2, massive pleural effusion developed on the 10th day after esophagectomy (at 3 days after thoracic drainage tube was removed). The thoracic duct was ligated at the level just cranial to the diaphragm thoracoscopically on the 14th day after esophagectomy. The patient was discharged from hospital on the 30th day after the second operation. Injury to the thoracic duct due to a magnification effect of the view of scopic surgery remains a pitfall in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. But thoracoscopic ligation of thoracic duct was effective and safe for these two cases of chylothorax after esophagectomy.     

Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative chylothorax remains an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of esophagectomy for cancer, and the ideal management is still controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated nonoperatively with those of patients promptly undergoing reoperation. METHODS: From 1980 to 1998, 1787 esophagectomies for esophageal or cardia cancer were performed, and 19 (1.1%) patients had postoperative chylothorax. We analyzed type of operation, surgical approach, delay of diagnosis of chylothorax, daily chest tube output, type of management, major complications, death, hospital stay, and final outcome. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients with chylothorax, 11 were initially managed nonoperatively (group A): 4 (36%) patients had spontaneous resolution of chylothorax, and the other 7 required reoperation for the persistence of a high-volume output. There were three infectious complications and one postoperative death in this group. No reliable predictive criteria of successful versus unsuccessful nonoperative management could be found. The 8 most recent patients underwent early reoperation (group B). All patients recovered, and no major complications possibly related to chylothorax or hospital deaths were observed. They were discharged after a median of 22 days (range, 12-85 days) compared with a median of 36 days (range, 21-64 days) for patients of group A. CONCLUSIONS: Early thoracic duct ligation is the treatment of choice for chylothorax occurring after esophagectomy. Reoperation should be performed immediately after the diagnosis is made to avoid the complications related to nutritional and immunologic depletion caused by prolonged nonoperative treatment.     

Video-assisted right supradiaphragmatic thoracic duct ligation for non-traumatic recurrent chylothorax.

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax is an uncommon disorder with respiratory, nutritional and immunological manifestations. Surgical management is indicated in case of recurrence or failure after conservative treatment. We report our experience with video-assisted right-sided supradiaphragmatic thoracic duct ligation for non-traumatic, non-postoperative persistent or recurrent chylothorax. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of six patients operated at our institution between 1999 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. A right-sided chylothorax was found in four patients, a left-sided in one, and a bilateral in one. Three patients developed chylothorax after chemotherapy and chest irradiation for malignant diseases (lymphoma in two patients and breast cancer in one), one in the context of lymphangioleiomyomatosis, one due to a non-diagnosed lymphoma, and one after heart transplantation. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 102 min, with an average length of hospital stay of 14 days. Persistent cessation of chylous effusion within 7 days after surgery was observed in 5/6 patients without recurrence during a mean follow-up time of 41 months. One patient with undiagnosed mediastinal lymphoma required re-operation and thoracic duct ligation on day 8 by right-sided thoracotomy due to persistent chylothorax. No 30-day mortality was recorded. Two patients presented postoperative complications including respiratory insufficiency requiring mechanical ventilation in one, and chylous ascites development requiring peritoneo-venous LeVeen shunting in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent or persistent non-traumatic chylothorax may be successfully treated by video-assisted right supradiaphragmatic thoracic duct ligation.     

Thoracoscopic direct clipping of the thoracic duct for chylopericardium and chylothorax

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax is a challenging clinical problem. Untreated, it carries a high mortality and morbidity. Traditional surgical management for cases refractory to conservative treatment is thoracic duct ligation through a right open thoracotomy. METHODS: We describe 4 patients treated successfully by video-assisted thoracic surgery, using ports and no thoracotomy, and precise ligation and division of the thoracic duct just above the diaphragm. A pericardial window was made in the patient with chylopericardium, as in the patient with end-stage renal disease. Pleurodesis was used in the patient with esophageal carcinoma and the patient with jugular and subclavian vein thrombosis. RESULTS: There were 2 women aged 18 and 42 years and 2 men, aged 61 and 65 years. No procedure-related mortality or morbidity occurred. In patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, the postoperative duration of drainage was 5, 7, 7, and 5 days, respectively (mean duration, 6 days) and the hospital stay, 5, 9, 10, and 5 days, respectively (mean stay, 7 days). There was no recurrence of chylothorax or chylopericardium during follow-up (range, 2 to 24 months; mean follow-up, 9 months). One patient died of esophageal carcinoma 4 months after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted thoracic surgery without a thoracotomy is an effective way of treating chylothorax and carries minimal morbidity.     

Thoracoscopic clipping of the thooracic duct for chylothorax following esophagectomy: report of a case

Thoracoscopic clipping of the thoracic duct was successfully performed for the treatment of postoperative chylothorax. Chylothorax occurred in a 67-year-old man following an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Following unsuccessful conservative therapy for 3 weeks, we performed thoracoscopic surgery to examine the thoracic duct and found a leaking point of chylous fluid. The thoracic duct was successfully clipped resulting in complete elimination of the effusion immediately after surgery. Generally, chylothorax complicated by an esophagectomy has been managed by medical treatment first, followed by surgical intervention in case of uncontrollable pleural effusion. We think you should try this method at first in case chylothorax was able to be treated with not thoracotomy but thoracoscopic surgery: minimal invasiveness.     

Aggressive treatment of chylothorax complicating transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy

Chylothorax is an unusual complication after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) and in the past 10 years has occurred in 11 of 320 patients (3%) undergoing this operation for diseases of the intrathoracic esophagus. Four patients had benign esophageal disease: scleroderma reflux esophagitis (1), caustic stricture (1), and achalasia (2), and each had undergone at least one previous esophageal operation. Seven patients had intrathoracic esophageal carcinoma--two upper-third, two middle-third, and three distal-third lesions. Excessive chest tube drainage more than 72 hours after THE was the standard presentation, and the diagnosis of chylothorax was confirmed by the administration of cream through the jejunostomy feeding tube placed routinely at operation. The character of the chest tube drainage changed from serous to opalescent. Aggressive treatment of this complication was the rule, and every patient underwent a thoracotomy between 2 to 14 days (average, 6 days) after the diagnosis was established. Cream was administered through the jejunostomy tube before operation, and in each case the thoracic duct injury was readily identified and controlled with suture ligatures. There were no deaths in this group, and there was one recurrence of the fistula that required reoperation; all patients were discharged from the hospital within 3 to 29 days (average, 10 days) after thoracic duct ligation. It is concluded that early recognition of a chylothorax after transhiatal esophagectomy with prompt transthoracic ligation of the injured duct results in a shorter overall hospitalization and lower morbidity and mortality from this complication. The traditional conservative management of chylothorax with intravenous hyperalimentation and no or low-residue enteral feedings has little place in this nutritionally depleted patient population.     

Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: experience with 26 patients

Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in 26 patients with esophageal carcinoma. The patients were selected for this procedure by means of transhiatal palpation of the tumor at laparotomy. Twenty had squamous cell carcinoma and 6, adenocarcinoma. The tumor locations were the upper third in 8, middle third in 12, and lower third in 6. On postoperative staging, 15 patients had Stage III and 6, Stage IV neoplasms. Among 25 elective resections there was 1 hospital death, which was due to severe coronary artery disease. One patient who had an urgent resection for a perforated carcinoma died of multisystem failure 32 days postoperatively. Complications included splenic injury requiring splenectomy in 5 patients; tracheal laceration in 2 patients (only 1 requiring a thoracotomy); azygos vein laceration requiring sternotomy for repair in 1 patient; chylothorax in 1; recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in 3 (temporary in 2); and transient anastomotic leaks in 3. Five patients had pneumonia with transient respiratory failure. Twelve of the operative survivors died of cancer 3.2 to 32 months postoperatively, and 12 are alive 3 to 28 months after operation. The actuarial survival is 53 +/- 11% (+/- standard error) at one year and 46 +/- 12% at two years. Transhiatal esophagectomy is a reasonable, safe operation that should be considered for tumors at all levels of the esophagus.     

Limited operation for patients with T1 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy has been introduced as a minimally invasive operation to prevent postoperative complications in patients with relatively early-stage esophageal cancer who have preoperative pulmonary or cardiovascular complications or who are in a high age bracket. However, this procedure for patients with esophageal cancer remains controversial, especially as regards curative surgery because complete intrathoracic lymphadenectomy cannot be performed in this operation. Thus, cancer recurrence after this operation has been considered to be high. To evaluate the benefits of this less invasive surgery for patients with T1 esophageal cancer, the prognoses of patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy were compared with those of patients who underwent traditional esophagectomy with thoracotomy. METHODS: Between 1989 and 1998, 33 patients with T1 esophageal cancer were operated on in our hospital. We introduced transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy in 19 patients who were over 70 years old or who had preoperative complications (transhiatal group). The remaining 14 patients were treated with the transthoracic procedure (transthoracic group). These 33 patients were followed up at our hospital until the end of 1999. The postoperative complications and prognoses in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: We were able to reduce the operation time using the transhiatal procedure. Even though no significant difference was detected, there were fewer postoperative pulmonary complications with this procedure (11%) than with the transthoracic procedure (21%). The incidences of in-hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups. Cancer recurrence was detected in 5 of 19 patients (26%) in the transhiatal group and in 5 of 14 patients (36%) in the transthoracic group; no difference was observed (P=0.562). The 5-year survival rate (58%) of the transhiatal group was no different from that of the transthoracic group (62%, P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Complete intrathoracic lymphadenectomy cannot be performed along with transhiatal esophagectomy; however, the prognoses of patients who were treated with this procedure were no different from those of patients who were treated with transthoracic esophagectomy. Thus, transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy might be a justifiable operation for compromised patients with T1 esophageal cancer.     

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: The Ivor-Lewis procedure is a radical, invasive, and effective procedure for the resection of most esophageal cancers. To minimize invasiveness, we performed thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy and mediastinal dissection for esophageal cancer. METHODS: From November 1995 to June 1997, 23 patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer, excluding T4 cancers, underwent thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy. Bilateral cervical dissections were performed as well as preparation of the gastric tube and transhiatal dissection of the lower esophagus. The cervical esophagus was cut using a stapler knife, and esophageal reconstruction was performed through the retrosternal route or anterior chest wall. Next, thoracoscopic mediastinal dissection and esophagectomy were performed. RESULTS: The mean volume of blood loss was 163 +/- 122 ml; mean thoracoscopic surgery duration, 111 +/- 24 min; mean postoperative day for patients to start eating, 8 +/- 3 days; and mean hospital stay, 26 +/- 8 days. No patient developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome postoperatively. Tracheal injury occurred and was repaired during the thoracoscopic approach in one patient. No patients died within 30 days after surgery. Postoperative complications included transient recurrent nerve palsy in five patients, pulmonary secretion retention requiring tracheotomy in two, and chylothorax in one. Five patients died of cancer recurrence within 1 year of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical experience with thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy indicate that it is a feasible and useful procedure.     

Transhiatal esophagectomy

Thirty-six patients underwent resection of the thoracic esophagus without a thoracotomy for the management of cancer of the cervical esophagus (2 patients), middle third and lower third of the esophagus (4 patients and 23 patients, respectively), and the gastroesophageal junction (17 patients). In addition to a total esophagectomy, two patients required a laryngectomy and seven patients had a total gastrectomy. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in three patients. Postoperative complications included subphrenic abscess (Candida) (2 patients), diaphragmatic hernia (1 patient), and salivary fistula (11 patients). Three patients died in the postoperative period from necrosis of interposed colon, pneumonia, and liver failure due to liver metastasis. The average blood loss was 1,300 ml, the duration of surgical procedure was 5.3 hours, and the hospital stay was 21 days. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 80 percent, 50 percent, and 33 percent, respectively. Transhiatal esophagectomy can be considered a sound alternative to transthoracic esophagectomy in the management of tumors involving the cervical and lower esophagus. Small lesions of the middle third should also be considered for this procedure, however, bulky lesions of the upper esophagus are better removed by thoracotomy.     

Postoperative chylothorax: differences between patients who received median sternotomy or lateral thoracotomy for congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax after surgery for congenital heart disease is rare. We wanted to compare the different presentations of chylothorax in patients who received median sternotomy or lateral thoracotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied pediatric patients with congenital heart disease who received palliative or corrective surgeries and developed postoperative chylothorax between January 1992 and July 2003. Patients were divided into two groups by the type of surgery: median sternotomy and lateral thoracotomy. The average daily fluid amount (mL/kg/24 hours), latency period, duration of chylothorax, and requirement for surgery were compared. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (11 boys, 6 girls; mean age, 14.0 +/- 12.8-month-old) were enrolled. Diagnoses were tetralogy of Fallot (n = 8), right isomerism with complex heart defects (n = 3), patent ductus arteriosus (n = 2), transposition of the great artery (n = 1), ventricular septal defect (n = 1), and endocardial cushion defect (n = 2). There were 9 in the lateral thoracotomy group and 8 in the median sternotomy group. Only one patient required surgery because of the failure of conservative treatment. The lateral thoracotomy group had a significantly lower average body weight (6.9 +/- 2.9 kg vs. 11.0 +/- 3.8 kg) and longer average latency period before postoperative chylothorax (15.1 +/- 9.2 days vs. 7.2 +/- 4.7 days). CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric patients who develop chylothorax after cardiac surgery can be successfully managed by medical treatment only. To avoid complications in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery, chylothorax should be suspected for patients with unexplainable, prolonged, and abundant pleural effusion.     

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in a previously pneumonectomized patient

Abstract Introduction: Surgical resection represents the only therapeutic action having a radical intent for the treatment of resectable esophageal neoplasms. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is being more and more frequently performed. Few cases of esophagectomy after pneumonectomy have been described in the literature, and, to our knowledge, none of them was performed by the minimally invasive technique. Subject and Methods: A 77-year-old woman, who had undergone left thoracotomic pneumonectomy due to squamous cell lung cancer 2 years before, underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy because of esophageal cancer at the authors' institution. The intervention was performed by right thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with the patient in the prone position, followed by the laparoscopic and cervicotomic stages, with cervical anastomosis. Results: Total operative time was 230 minutes. Intensive care unit stay was 1 day, followed by a hospital stay of 13 days. We did not observe any major postoperative complication. Conclusions: Minimally invasive esophagectomy with thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization in the prone position is a valid option in the treatment of esophageal cancer and may be feasible in previously left pneumonectomized patients.     

膈上胸导管结扎术在食管癌切除术中的应用

目的探讨胸导管结扎术对食管癌术后乳糜胸的预防和治疗作用。方法回顾性分析我院2003年1月至2009年6月的两组共836例食管癌切除术后的乳糜胸发生情况和治疗效果。其中结扎组431例,术中常规在膈上水平整块结扎胸导管,非结扎组405例,术中未常规结扎胸导管,术后并发乳糜胸者,再次采用手术治疗。结果结扎组无术后乳糜胸发生。非结扎组术后发生乳糜胸15例（3．7％）,治愈13例（86．7％）,死亡2例（13．3％）,1例死于呼吸功能衰竭,1例死于多器官功能衰竭。结论食管癌切除术中常规结扎胸导管可有效预防术后乳糜胸的发生。膈上胸导管结扎法稳妥有效。食管癌术后并发乳糜胸应积极手术治疗。     

Prophylactic Thoracic Duct Mass Ligation Prevents Chylothorax After Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Cancer

Background  Chylothorax after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening postoperative complication. It has been reported that preventive thoracic duct ligation can reduce the incidence of postoperative chylothorax after esophagectomy for cancer. In this prospective series, we evaluated the results of preventive intraoperative thoracic duct mass ligation in patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Methods  From 2001 to 2006, 323 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer and duct ligation during the operation was routinely performed. Results  No intraoperative or postoperative complications directly related to the procedure were recorded. No postoperative chylothorax was observed. Conclusions  In this series, the technique of intraoperative thoracic duct mass ligation proved to be safe and effectively prevented postoperative chylothorax in patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.     

Use of LeVeen pleuroperitoneal shunt for refractory high-volume chylothorax

We present a case of intractable high-volume (> 2L/d) chylothorax after transhiatal esophagectomy treated successfully with the simultaneous insertion of both Denver (Denver Biomedical, Golden, CO) and LeVeen (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) pleuroperitoneal shunts. The patient initially had chemoradiotherapy for a T4N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Re-staging showed a dramatic shrinkage of tumor, and a transhiatal esophagectomy was performed. Sequential bilateral thoracotomies were performed on postoperative days 19 and 26 for attempted control of high-volume chylothorax, but these were unsuccessful. Subsequent pleuroperitoneal shunt insertion was used, which immediately controlled the effusion. A shunt study was performed shortly after hospital discharge, which showed an occluded Denver shunt and a patent LeVeen shunt. The patient succumbed to metastatic carcinoma 18 months after discharge, but no pleural effusion had recurred.     

三腔喂养管联合管状胃治疗老年食管癌的临床效果分析

目的比较三腔喂养管联合管状胃与传统手术方法治疗老年食管癌患者的临床效果。方法选取2007年1月至2013年1月绵阳市中心医院胸心外科收治的196例年龄大于60岁的食管癌患者,按手术方式不同分为三腔喂养管联合管状胃组（A组）和传统手术组（B组）。A组96例,男51例、女45例,年龄（66.21±7.32）岁;B组100例,男54例、女46例,年龄（65.43±6.37）岁。比较两组患者的临床指标。结果两组患者均顺利完成根治手术。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后乳糜胸、术后喉返神经麻痹、吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄发生率及死亡率等临床指标差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。A组肛门排气时间和住院时间较B组显著缩短,术后心律失常、肺部并发症、胸胃综合征发生率较B组显著降低（P〈0.05）。结论三腔喂养管空肠营养联合管状胃在老年食管癌手术中通过围手术期治疗可以降低部分并发症发生率,可缩短住院时间和改善患者的生活质量。     

Usefulness of video-assisted thoracic surgery (Two Windows Method) in the treatment of lung cancer for elderly patients

BACKGROUND: We have been performing it less invasively by making just two, small skin incisions (Two Windows Method) for lung cancer surgery. We assess the usefulness of VATS by the Two Windows Method in elderly patients. METHODS: The subjects were 32 of the 75-year-old or older patients with primary lung cancer in our department. We assessed cases in which thoracotomy was performed and the cases in which VATS by Two Windows Method was performed, and compared postoperative complications, hospital deaths, and postoperative length of stay. RESULTS: Operations by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) by the Two Windows Method were completed in 20 of the 32 patients, and a conversion to thoracotomy was done in two patients (rate 9%). Ultimately, thoracotomy was performed in a total of 12 cases, including these two. In the thoracotomy patients, the most common postoperative complication was pneumonia/atelectasis (4 cases) secondary to poor sputum expectoration. There were 2 hospital deaths due to septicemia, and there was 1 due to pulmonary artery embolism. In the VATS patients, the rate of occurrence of postoperative complications was 30%, and clearly lower than the 67% among the thoracotomy patients (p<0.05). No hospital death occurred among the VATS patients. The postoperative hospital stay of the VATS patients (21 days) was shorter than that of the thoracotomy patients (31 days), (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VATS by the Two Windows Method is safer than thoracotomy, and it should be considered first for lung cancer surgery in the aged.     

Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign disease

Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy has been performed in 65 adult patients with dysphagia from benign esophageal disease: strictures (30), neuromotor dysfunction (24), acute iatrogenic perforation (five), acute caustic injury (four), and recurrent gastroesophageal reflux (two). Nearly 70% (45) had undergone at least one prior esophageal operation, and 26% (17) had a history of between two and four esophageal operations. The esophagus was replaced with stomach in 53 patients (82%), colon being used only when there was a history of either prior gastric resection or caustic injury to the stomach (10 patients). Intraoperative blood loss averaged 1,050 ml. Intraoperative complications included pneumothorax in 38 patients (58%) and a tracheal laceration in one patient. Postoperative complications included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis (11 patients, 17%), chylothorax (four patients, 6%), anastomotic leak (four patients, 6%), and small bowel obstruction (two patients). There were five hospital deaths (8% mortality), none related to the technique of esophagectomy. Follow-up ranges from 1 to 84 months (average 28 months). Of 46 patients with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in the original esophageal bed, 42 have had an excellent functional result although 17 have required at least one postoperative esophageal dilation. Two have developed true anastomotic strictures. Clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux has not occurred. Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign disease is feasible and safe, even after multiple previous esophageal operations. The stomach appears to be a better visceral esophageal substitute than colon, because it allows an initially easier technical operation and superior long-term functional results.     

Neonatal pneumopericardium: a surgical emergency

Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy has been utilized in 200 patients: 57 with benign disease and 143 with carcinomas at various levels of the esophagus (35 pharyngeal or cervicothoracic, 7 upper third, 47 middle third, and 54 distal third). Stomach has been used to replace the esophagus in 93% of patients undergoing single-stage esophagectomy and reconstruction, and colon has been used in 7%. Among patients with intrathoracic esophageal carcinomas, intraoperative blood loss averaged 1,000 ml, and the hospital mortality was 6%. No patient in the entire series has required a thoracotomy for control of bleeding, either during the esophagectomy or postoperatively. This report reviews the technical maneuvers that my collegues and I have found useful in performing transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy.