The contribution of the MPTP-treated primate model to the development of new treatment strategies for Parkinson's disease

Current research into Parkinson's disease (PD) is directed at developing novel agents and strategies for improved symptomatic management. The aim of this research is to provide effective and maintained symptom control throughout the course of the disease without loss of efficacy and without priming the basal ganglia for the onset of dyskinesia. To achieve these objectives, it is important to have relevant animal models of PD in which new pharmacological agents and treatment strategies can be assessed prior to clinical assessment. At present, the most effective experimental model of PD is the methyl phenyl tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated primate. Primates treated with MPTP develop motor disturbances resembling those seen in idiopathic PD, including bradykinesia, rigidity and postural abnormalities. In addition, MPTP-treated primates are responsive to all commonly used antiparkinsonian agents and display treatment-associated motor complications such as dyskinesia, wearing-off and on-off, which occur during the long-term treatment of the illness.This review examines how studies conducted in MPTP-treated primates have contributed to the development of dopaminergic therapies. There is now accumulating evidence that the pulsatile manner in which short-acting agents stimulate striatal dopamine receptors is a key contributing factor to the priming of the basal ganglia for dyskinesia induction. It has been suggested that providing more continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors will avoid the development of motor complications, particularly dyskinesia. So far, the actions of all commonly used antiparkinsonian drugs assessed in MPTP-treated primates have proved to be highly predictive of drug action in PD. These primate studies have demonstrated that long-acting dopamine agonists and levodopa given in combination with a catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor (to increase its relatively short half-life), induce significantly less dyskinesia than occurs with standard levodopa therapy.     

How to succeed in using dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists are assuming increased importance in the treatment of both early and advanced symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, tolerability of these drugs can be a problem. Identifying patients who are at increased risk of adverse effects is central to using dopamine agonists in PD. The newer agonists, pramipexole and ropinirole, are generally adequate without levodopa for early symptoms and carry the hope for a more acceptable profile of long-term side-effects. In the patient with advanced disease, all four dopamine agonists significantly augment the response to levodopa, which reduces the problems of motor fluctuations and drug related dyskinesia. Understanding the common pitfalls when prescribing these drugs will facilitate their safety and efficacy.     

Dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are established as effective drugs for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) throughout its course. As monotherapy, they produce effective control of motor symptoms and combine this with a low risk for motor complications. As an adjunct to levodopa, they improve motor control and limit the need for levodopa in those patients in whom this may be considered relevant. The non-ergot dopamine agonists in particular have a good safety profile, although as with other agonists, sedation, and cognitive and behavioral problems may be limiting in some patients. Pramipexole has shown benefit in improving depressive symptoms in PD. Ropinirole and pramipexole have both demonstrated a reduction in the rate of loss of nigrostriatal innervation as determined by imaging in PD patients, when compared with levodopa. Thus, dopamine agonists contribute to several dimensions of the management of PD and have become an integral part of the disease treatment algorithm.     

Pulsatile or continuous dopaminomimetic strategies in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa is the most effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) for both motor and non-motor control. Pulsatile levodopa administration likely contributes to the development of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia after a few years. All studies comparing levodopa versus dopamine agonist early therapy indicate that initiation with agonists is associated with a reduced risk of motor complications - in particular, dyskinesias - possibly because agonists' longer half-lives provide continuous dopaminergic delivery. Indeed, this therapeutic strategy may delay the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia which is essential to maintaining satisfactory quality of life. In advanced disease various levodopa-based strategies may be tried to control motor complications, such as dose fragmentation (smaller, more frequent dosing) or the use of orally administered, liquid levodopa formulations that may reduce off-time intervals or facilitate absorption. More recently introduced, continuous levodopa delivery by duodenal infusion (but also apomorphine infusion) may represent a more effective approach to treat motor complications in advanced PD, and its effect can be perceived by improvement both in clinical scales as well as in health-related items. Infusion therapies may reverse motor complications in complicated patients with significant benefit on quality of life.     

Initial treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: A review of recent, randomized controlled trials

Many studies have shown dopamine agonists to significantly improve parkinsonian symptoms compared with placebo in early Parkinson’s disease (PD), but how do agonists compare with the standard treatment of levodopa? Recently, three large, multicenter, randomized controlled studies directly comparing a dopamine agonist with levodopa as initial therapy in early PD have been published. These studies suggest that although both agents effectively ameliorate parkinsonian symptoms, levodopa was superior to dopamine agonists as measured by improvement in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. However, levodopa was more frequently associated with dopaminergic motor complications, and the dopamine agonists were more commonly associated with adverse events. Until further studies clearly demonstrate the beneficial effects of one therapeutic strategy over another, the decision to initiate treatment in early PD with either an agonist or levodopa will be based on the favorable motor complication profile of agonists versus the more potent antiparkinsonian effects and the favorable side-effect profile of levodopa.     

Pardoprunox reverses motor deficits but induces only mild dyskinesia in MPTP‐treated common marmosets

Long‐acting full dopamine D₂ agonists produce less dyskinesia in 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)‐treated primates and in Parkinson's disease than effective antiparkinsonian doses of levodopa. They do not however, prevent priming for dyskinesia expression on subsequent levodopa exposure. In contrast, the effects of partial D₂ receptor agonists on dyskinesia are unclear. We now examine the ability of the partial D₂ agonist pardoprunox (SLV308) to improve motor function and its propensity to prime for dyskinesia in drug naïve, MPTP‐treated common marmosets. Previously, drug naïve, MPTP‐treated common marmosets were treated with equivalent doses of either pardoprunox (SLV308) (0.1 mg/kg po), ropinirole (0.18 mg/kg po), or levodopa (10 mg/kg po BID) for 28 days. All treatments induced a similar reduction of motor disability. Dyskinesia induced by levodopa was of greater intensity than that following administration of either pardoprunox (SLV308) or ropinirole. Administration of pardoprunox (SLV308) resulted in dyskinesia that was less intense and of shorter duration than either ropinirole or levodopa. At the end of drug treatment, acute challenge with levodopa resulted in the expression of marked dyskinesia in animals that had previously received chronic levodopa or ropinirole treatment. However, animals previously treated with pardoprunox (SLV308) showed only mild dyskinesia in response to the levodopa challenge. These results suggest that the partial D₂ agonist pardoprunox (SLV308) is less likely to prime for dyskinesia or to lead to the expression of dyskinesia than either levodopa or full dopamine agonists. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

The role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: Clinical cases and a review of the literature

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and, as such, many brain regions, including the basal ganglia, are rich in glutamatergic neurons. The importance of the basal ganglia in the control of voluntary movement has long been recognised, with the effect of dysfunction of the region exemplified by the motor symptoms seen in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the basal ganglia and the associated glutamatergic system also play a role in the modulation of emotion, nociception and cognition, dysregulation of which result in some of the non-motor symptoms of PD (depression/anxiety, pain and cognitive deficits). Thus, while the treatment of PD has traditionally been approached from the perspective of dopaminergic replacement, using agents such as levodopa and dopamine receptor agonists, the glutamatergic system offers a novel treatment target for the disease. Safinamide has been approved in over 20 countries globally for fluctuating PD as add-on therapy to levodopa regimens for the management of ‘off’ episodes. The drug has both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic pharmacological effects, the latter including inhibition of abnormal glutamate release. The effect of safinamide on the glutamatergic system might present some advantages over dopamine-based therapies for PD by providing efficacy for motor (levodopa-induced dyskinesia) as well as non-motor (anxiety, mood disorders, pain) symptoms. In this article, we discuss the potential role of glutamatergic inhibition on these symptoms, using illustrative real-world examples of patients we have treated with safinamide.     

Comparison of the clinical pharmacology of (-)NPA and levodopa in Parkinson''s disease.

Direct acting dopamine agonists are generally less effective than levodopa in relieving symptoms of Parkinson's disease. In an attempt to quantitate and explain this situation, the acute motor responses to intravenous injections of the dopamine agonist, (-)-N-n-propyl-norapomorphine hydrochloride (NPA), were compared with those of the dopamine precursor, levodopa. At optimum dose levels, the acute anti-Parkinsonian efficacy of NPA averaged only about 50% of maximum, while essentially total symptom suppression was obtained with levodopa in patients previously treated with the amine precursor. Dyskinesia severity, however, was similar with the two drugs. These differences in anti-Parkinsonian efficacy may reflect the fact that while NPA acts mainly on D-2 dopamine receptors, levodopa results in stimulation of both the D-1 and D-2 subsets of receptors at a more physiological ratio. Future efforts to develop dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinsonian symptoms may thus have to consider focusing on drugs having pharmacological profile more similar to that of dopamine.     

The rationale for continuous dopaminergic stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease

Control of movement depends on the continuous release of dopamine by neurons in the basal ganglia of the brain. The degeneration of these neurons in Parkinson's disease (PD) interferes with the flow of dopamine, leading to classic motor symptoms. In early PD, enough dopaminergic neurons remain to store dopamine provided by periodic dosing with oral levodopa and relatively normal, tonic levels of dopamine release are maintained. PD progression leads to degeneration of remaining dopaminergic terminals and loss of buffering capacity for exogenous levodopa. As a result, there are supraphysiological levels of dopamine after dosing and troughs when the available dopamine has been depleted. These divergent levels are associated with dyskinesia and ‘off’ states, respectively. Treatment strategies that provide a continuous flow of dopamine and can thus mimic normal physiological dopamine stimulation have potential to improve motor control for patients with advanced PD.     

Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is the preferred treatment for Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations in routine practice: a retrospective, observational analysis of a large French cohort

Levodopa is the gold standard drug for the symptomatic control of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, long-term treatment with conventional formulations [levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI)], is associated with re-emergence of symptoms because of wearing-off and dyskinesia. Treatment with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone extends the half-life of levodopa, avoiding deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and providing more continuous delivery of levodopa to the brain. In this open-label, retrospective, observational study we investigated the effects of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy in 800 PD patients with motor fluctuations. Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment was assessed as good/very good in improving motor fluctuations (64%) and activities of daily living (ADL; 62%). The therapeutic utility was considered to be good/very good in 70% of cases. Moreover, there was a reduction in levodopa dose in 20% of patients. Neurologists preferred levodopa/DDCI and entacapone compared with increasing levodopa dosage, dose-fractionation or addition of a dopamine agonist (63%, 29% and 23% of patients respectively). Reasons included achieving more continuous dopaminergic stimulation (40%), reducing motor fluctuations (54%) and improving ADL (41%). This analysis reveals the preference of neurologists for levodopa/DDCI and entacapone over conventional levodopa-modification strategies for the effective treatment of PD motor fluctuations in clinical practice.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are highly effective as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease and have rapidly gained popularity as a monotherapy in the early stages of Parkinson's disease for patients less than 65-70 years old. In the latter case, dopamine agonists are about as effective as levodopa but patients demonstrate a lower tendency to develop motor complications. However, dopamine agonists lose efficacy over time and the number of patients remaining on agonist monotherapy decreases to less than 50% after 3 years of treatment. Thus, after a few years of treatment the majority of patients who started on dopamine agonists will be administered levodopa, in a combined dopaminergic therapy, in order to achieve a better control of motor symptoms.     

Myths and realities of continuous dopaminergic stimulation

Motor fluctuations and dyskinesia in later stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) are caused by pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic factors, intermittent dopaminergic stimulation being one of the most important. In the healthy brain, dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta fire tonically at a steady rate of about 4 cycles/second. In later stages of PD, steady firing is replaced by pulsatile stimulation which causes molecular and physiologic changes in the basal ganglia. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation has been shown to dramatically improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesia by modifications of oral treatment (dopamine agonists, smaller, more frequent levodopa doses, controlled-release formulation of levodopa, addition of agents that slow down the catabolism of dopamine, such as inhibitors of catechol-O-methyl transferase and monoamine oxidase), transdermal delivery (rotigotine), infusion therapies (intravenous levodopa, subcutaneous application of apomorphine and lisuride, duodenal infusion of levodopa) and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.     

Rationale for dopamine agonist use as monotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists are increasingly being used in the initial treatment of patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease because they provide symptom relief and a low risk of the dyskinesia frequently associated with levodopa. Evidence is also mounting in preclinical models that dopamine agonists protect dopaminergic neurons from the toxic effects of oxidative stress and the by-products of dopamine and L-dopa metabolism. Ergot derivatives, such as pergolide, induce minor side-effects and provide significant and sustained improvements in motor function in patients with early Parkinson's disease. Dopamine agonists also appear to reduce the loss of functional dopamine transporters when used early in the disease course, and these factors combine to build a case for the use of dopamine agonists in early-stage Parkinson's disease.     

Mechanisms underlying the onset and expression of levodopa-induced dyskinesia and their pharmacological manipulation

A significant proportion of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) receiving dopamine replacement therapy in the form of levodopa develop dyskinesia that becomes a major complicating factor in treatment. Dyskinesia can only be effectively treated by a reduction in drug dose, which limits efficacy, by co-administration of the weak NMDA antagonist amantadine or by surgical treatment (pallidotomy, DBS). This raises the important question of why dyskinesia occurs in PD and how it can be avoided or suppressed by pharmacological treatment. This review assesses some of the mechanisms that underlie dyskinesia induction and expression from presynaptic changes in dopaminergic neurones to postsynaptic alterations in basal ganglia function and examines potential approaches to prevention and treatment. These include glutamatergic approaches where agents that directly or indirectly alter glutamatergic neurotransmission modify the intracellular influx of Ca²⁺ and reduce the formation of nitric oxide by neuronal nitric oxide synthase that may form an integral component of the complex cascade of events leading to dyskinesia. There is increasing evidence for the role of serotoninergic neurones in dyskinesia induction related to non-physiological formation and release of dopamine and serotoninergic agonists can modify dyskinesia expression. Similarly, noradrenergic receptors may serve to alter dyskinesia intensity and α-2-adrenoceptor antagonists alter the expression of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in both experimental models of PD and in man. Finally, other potential approaches to dyskinesia treatment based on manipulation of opiate, cannabinoid, adenosine and histamine receptors are considered. The conclusion is that the cause of levodopa-induced dyskinesia remains to be fully elucidated and that new approaches to treatment through non-dopaminergic mechanisms are required to control the onset and expression of involuntary movements.     

Practice parameter: initiation of treatment for Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based review: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

In 1993, the last AAN Practice Parameter on medical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) concluded that levodopa was the most effective drug for management of this disorder. Since then, a number of new compounds including non-ergot dopamine agonists (DA) and sustained-release levodopa have been released and studied. Thus, the issue of treatment in de novo PD patients warrants reexamination. Specific questions include: 1) does selegiline offer neuroprotection; 2) what is the best agent with which to initiate symptomatic treatment in de novo PD; and 3) is there a benefit of sustained release levodopa over immediate-release levodopa? Using evidence-based principles, a literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify all human trials in de novo PD between 1966 and 1999. Only articles that fulfilled class I or class II evidence were included. Based on this review, the authors conclude: 1) Selegiline has very mild symptomatic benefit (level A, class II evidence) with no evidence for neuroprotective benefit (level U, class II evidence). 2) For PD patients requiring initiation of symptomatic therapy, either levodopa or a DA can be used (level A, class I and class II evidence). Levodopa provides superior motor benefit but is associated with a higher risk of dyskinesia. 3) No evidence was found that initiating treatment with sustained-release levodopa provides an advantage over immediate-release levodopa (level B, class II evidence).     

Levodopa treatment and dendritic spine pathology

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with the progressive loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. Levodopa is the most effective treatment for the motor symptoms of PD. However, chronic oral levodopa treatment can lead to various motor and nonmotor complications because of nonphysiological pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation in the brain. Examinations of autopsy cases with PD have revealed a decreased number of dendritic spines of striatal neurons. Animal models of PD have revealed altered density and morphology of dendritic spines of neurons in various brain regions after dopaminergic denervation or dopaminergic denervation plus levodopa treatment, indicating altered synaptic transmission. Recent studies using rodent models have reported dendritic spine head enlargement in the caudate‐putamen, nucleus accumbens, primary motor cortex, and prefrontal cortex in cases where chronic levodopa treatment following dopaminergic denervation induced dyskinesia‐like abnormal involuntary movement. Hypertrophy of spines results from insertion of alpha‐amino‐2,3‐dihydro‐5‐methyl‐3‐oxo‐4‐isoxazolepropanoic acid receptors into the postsynaptic membrane. Such spine enlargement indicates hypersensitivity of the synapse to excitatory inputs and is compatible with a lack of depotentiation, which is an electrophysiological hallmark of levodopa‐induced dyskinesia found in the corticostriatal synapses of dyskinetic animals and the motor cortex of dyskinetic PD patients. This synaptic plasticity may be one of the mechanisms underlying the priming of levodopa‐induced complications such as levodopa‐induced dyskinesia and dopamine dysregulation syndrome. Drugs that could potentially prevent spine enlargement, such as calcium channel blockers, N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor antagonists, alpha‐amino‐2,3‐dihydro‐5‐methyl‐3‐oxo‐4‐isoxazolepropanoic acid receptor antagonists, and metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists, are candidates for treatment of levodopa‐induced complications in PD. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Dopamine agonists, receptor selectivity and dyskinesia induction in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa and the dopamine agonists are effective symptomatic treatments for Parkinson's disease, and all patients receive at least one of these agents during their illness. Long-term use of levodopa is commonly associated with motor complications such as dyskinesia, and both the dosing frequency and total daily dose of levodopa determine the rate of onset and severity. Dopamine agonists have gained popularity as first-line monotherapy in Parkinson's disease, as they effectively reverse motor deficits and reduce the risk of motor complications. Long-acting dopamine agonists providing continuous, rather than pulsatile, dopaminergic stimulation appear able to avoid dyskinesia induction. Current treatments act predominantly on D2 receptors, but drugs acting on both the D1 and D2 receptor families may produce an additive motor response, although this remains to be proven in patients with Parkinson's disease. Most currently used dopamine agonists are selective for D2-like receptors, with only pergolide and apomorphine potentially interacting with D1 receptor populations.     

International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

Objective: The objective of this review was to update evidence‐based medicine recommendations for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Background: The Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Committee recommendations for treatments of PD were first published in 2002 and updated in 2011, and we continued the review to December 31, 2016. Methods: Level I studies of interventions for motor symptoms were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion and quality scoring were as previously reported. Five clinical indications were considered, and conclusions regarding the implications for clinical practice are reported. Results: A total of 143 new studies qualified. There are no clinically useful interventions to prevent/delay disease progression. For monotherapy of early PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, oral levodopa preparations, selegiline, and rasagiline are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in early/stable PD, nonergot dopamine agonists, rasagiline, and zonisamide are clinically useful. For adjunct therapy in optimized PD for general or specific motor symptoms including gait, rivastigmine is possibly useful and physiotherapy is clinically useful; exercise‐based movement strategy training and formalized patterned exercises are possibly useful. There are no new studies and no changes in the conclusions for the prevention/delay of motor complications. For treating motor fluctuations, most nonergot dopamine agonists, pergolide, levodopa ER, levodopa intestinal infusion, entacapone, opicapone, rasagiline, zonisamide, safinamide, and bilateral STN and GPi DBS are clinically useful. For dyskinesia, amantadine, clozapine, and bilateral STN DBS and GPi DBS are clinically useful. Conclusions: The options for treating PD symptoms continues to expand. These recommendations allow the treating physician to determine which intervention to recommend to an individual patient. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Coexistent tardive dyskinesia and parkinsonism

Forty-six patients with tardive dyskinesia (TD) were studied to characterize the relationship between TD and parkinsonism. In two patients idiopathic parkinsonism (PD) preceded the use of neuroleptic drugs and in 15 patients TD was associated with drug-induced parkinsonism. Patients with TD alone were compared with patients who had the combination of TD and parkinsonism. Only age at onset of TD symptoms differentiated between the two groups (p less than 0.02); patients with associated parkinsonism had onset of TD later than patients with TD alone. Patients with PD may develop TD and the latter may be triggered by levodopa. When TD and parkinsonism are combined, the symptoms may be controlled by a careful use of dopamine depletors and levodopa.     

Treatment of Parkinson''s disease

The aim of current treatment of Parkinson's disease is to ameliorate the symptoms while seeking to lessen the potential development of late levodopa complications. To this end, there is ample evidence that the early use of dopamine agonists is beneficial in younger Parkinsonian patients but monotherapy with dopamine agonists is for only a select few. Nonergot dopamine agonists offer the potential for fewer side effects. Lower dose levodopa therapy delays the onset and reduces severity of dyskinesia and end of dose failure. However levodopa remains the treatment of choice in Parkinson's disease and should not be restricted unnecessarily in patients with disability. There is no evidence that levodopa is toxic to dopaminergic neurons in people with Parkinson's disease. As yet, no drugs are of proven neuroprotective value. Dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, amantadine and apomorphine have differing but beneficial roles in the management of levodopa side effects. Ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation of thalamus, globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus are increasingly available but choice of procedure depends not just on patient symptomatology, but also on local experience and results. Ideally, deep brain stimulation is the treatment of choice as it offers less morbidity than bilateral ablative surgery, the possibility of postoperative adjustments and the potential for reversibility if better treatments become available.