Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localized prostate cancer with reference to disease-related prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-2 localized prostate cancers, prostate specific antigen (PSA) 1 ng/ml with three consecutive rises. RESULTS: The study included 227 patients. Mean follow-up was 27+/-20 months (12-121 months). Eighty-six percent had negative control biopsies. Median nadir PSA was 0.10 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFSR), combining pathologic and biochemical outcomes, was 66%. DFSR showed a significant decrease when stratified according to initial PSA level: 90% with PSA 相似文献   

Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a multicenter study

We report a multicenter trial with transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. A total of 72 consecutive patients with stage T1c-2NOM0 prostate cancer were treated using the Sonablate 500TM HIFU device (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, USA). Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. The median age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level were 72 years and 8.10 ng/ml, respectively. The median follow-up period for all patients was 14.0 months. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in all patients at 1 and 2 years were 78% and 76%, respectively. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with stage T1c, T2a and T2b groups at 2 years were 89, 67% and 40% (p = 0.0817). Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-7 and 8-10 at 2 years were 88, 72% and 80% (p = 0.6539). Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with serum PSA of less than 10 ng/ml and 10-20 ng/ml were 75% and 78% (p = 0.6152). No viable tumor cells were noted in 68% of patients by postoperative prostate needle biopsy. Prostatic volume was decreased from 24.2 ml to 14.0 ml at 6 months after HIFU (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were noted in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate and quality of life analysis with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. HIFU therapy appears to be minimally invasive, efficacious and safe for patients with localized prostate cancer with pretreatment PSA levels less than 20 ng/ml.     

To what extent does the prostate‐specific antigen nadir predict subsequent treatment failure after transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound therapy for presumed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for organ-confined prostate cancer and subsequent treatment failure, as defined by the presence of residual disease at biopsy 6 months after treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and January 2005, 115 patients in a Japanese hospital were treated using a transrectal HIFU system (Sonablate, Focus Surgery, IN, USA) for presumed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. All treatments were primary and none of the patients had received hormone therapy. The PSA level was measured at 2-monthly intervals and all patients had a transrectal prostate biopsy taken at 6 months. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between PSA nadir and treatment failure, as defined by the presence of disease at biopsy. RESULTS: The PSA nadir was strongly associated with treatment failure (P < 0.001). Patients with a PSA nadir of 0.0-0.2 ng/mL had a treatment failure rate of only 11% (four of 36), compared to 46% (17 of 37) in patients with a PSA nadir of 0.21-1.00 ng/mL and 48% (20 of 42) with a PSA nadir of >1.0 ng/mL. In addition, the PSA nadir was strongly associated with both preoperative PSA level and residual prostate volume. CONCLUSION: There is a clear and intuitive association between the PSA nadir and the risk of treatment failure after HIFU. These data can be used to predict the risk of residual disease in patients with prostate cancer undergoing HIFU therapy. They can also be used to inform where the target PSA nadir should be set for this novel therapy.     

Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: factors influencing the outcome

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for localized prostate cancer and identification of the factors affecting the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 102 patients with prostate cancer stage T1-T2 and noncandidates for radical prostatectomy have been treated with HIFU (Ablatherm, EDAP-Technomed). The disease progression (failure) was strictly defined by any positive sample at control biopsies, whatever the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, or by 3 consecutive increases in PSA levels in case of negative biopsies. RESULTS: At inclusion, patients' baseline characteristics were (mean +/- standard deviation): age 70.8 (+/-6.13) years, PSA 8.38 (+/-4.8) ng/ml, prostate volume 33.3 (+/-16.71) cm3. The population mean follow-up was 19 months (3-76 months). The overall success rate was 66%. Statistically significant variations of the overall success with a more favorable outcome were observed when (1) the initial PSA level was < or =10 ng/ml (73 vs. 50%, p = 0.02), (2) the Gleason score was < or =6 (81 vs. 46%, p<0.001) and (3) the pretreatment sextant biopsy evidenced 1-4 positive samples (68 vs. 40%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Results observed after HIFU treatment in localized prostate cancer are now challenging those obtained after radiation therapy. The success rate is influenced by disease-related prognostic factors.     

经直肠高强度聚焦超声系统治疗前列腺癌57例疗效分析

目的:探讨经直肠高强度聚焦超声系统(HIFU)治疗PCa的疗效。方法:使用Sonablate500型经直肠HIFU治疗系统,对57例PCa患者进行HIFU治疗,其中局限性PCa27例,晚期PCa30例。在确定生化复发之前,对局限性PCa仅行经直肠HIFU治疗;对于晚期PCa,在行经直肠HIFU治疗的同时,联合应用内分泌治疗。结果:HIFU治疗平均手术操作时间为111(86～153)min,平均术后住院时间为3.2(2～18)d。平均随访时间18(6～30)个月。局限性PCaHIFU治疗后,生化检查阴性率(PSA(4.0μg/L)在治疗后的1、2、3年分别为86%、81%和79%。30例晚期PCa治疗平均8个月(3～24个月)后,26例血清PSA<4.0μg/L(其中20例血清PSA<0.5μg/L)、21例患者前列腺体积缩小>50%。治疗后6个月时与治疗前相比,前列腺体积缩小、PSA水平降低、Qmax增加及IPSS改善差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。HIFU治疗后无严重尿道直肠瘘、尿失禁等并发症发生。结论:经直肠HIFU治疗PCa,安全、有效,并发症少,近期疗效较好,是一种可选择的PCa微创治疗方法。     

High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study

PURPOSE: To describe the safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of prostate cancer as assessed in a Phase II/III prospective multicentric clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 402) presenting with localized (stage T(1-2)N(0-x)M(0)) prostate cancer between 1995 and 1999 at six European sites who were not candidates for radical prostatectomy were treated with HIFU under general or spinal anesthesia. Their mean age was 69.3 +/- 7.1 (SD) years, the mean prostate volume 28.0 +/- 13.8 cc, and the mean serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration 10.9 +/- 8.7 ng/mL. Nearly all (92.2%) of the patients had one to four positive biopsy samples at baseline. The Gleason scores were 2 to 4 for 13.2% of the patients, 5 to 7 for 77.5%, and 8 to 10 for 9.3%. During the follow-up, random sextant biopsies and serum PSA measurements were performed. Any positive sample in biopsies performed after the last treatment session resulted in a "HIFU failure" classification. RESULTS: The patients received a mean of 1.4 HIFU sessions. The mean follow-up duration was 407 days (quartile 1 135 days, median 321 days, quartile 3 598 days). The negative biopsy rate observed in the T1-2 primary-care population was 87.2%. These results were also stratified according to the usual disease-related risk classification, and as much as a 92.1% negative biopsy rate was observed in low-risk patients. Nadir PSA results correlated with prostate size and the clinical procedure. CONCLUSION: These short-term results obtained on a large cohort confirm that HIFU is an option to be considered for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.     

First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for patients with localised prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients included in this multicentre analysis had T1-T2 NxM0 prostate cancer, a PSA<15 ng/ml, and a Gleason score (GS) < or = 7, and were treated with prototypes or first-generation Ablatherm HIFU devices between October 1997 and August 2001. The Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was used (PSA nadir+2). Treatment failure was defined as: biochemical failure or positive biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients with a mean (SD) age 69.1 yr (6.6) were included. Mean (SD) follow-up was 6.4 yr (1.1). Control prostate biopsies were negative in 86.4% of patients. Median PSA nadir of 0.16 ng/ml (range, 0.0-9.1) was achieved at a mean (SD) of 4.9 mo (5.2). A PSA nadir < or = 0.5 ng/ml was recorded in 68.4% of patients. The actuarial biochemical failure-free survival rates (SR) at 5 and 7 yr were 77% and 69%, respectively. The actuarial disease-free SR at 5 and 7 yr were 66% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effective long-term cancer control achieved with HIFU in patients with low- or intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.     

Short-term outcome after high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of patients with high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term outcome in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated by transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2003 to November 2004, 30 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective study; all had transurethral resection of the prostate before transrectal HIFU treatment, using the Ablatherm device (EDAP, Lyon, France) during the same session, associated with hormonal therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. After the procedure, all the patients were evaluated every 3 months by physical examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay and a continence questionnaire. The follow-up schedule also included a transperineal prostate biopsy 6 months after the treatment. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: The HIFU treatment took a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 140 (100-160) min. No complications were reported during treatment. The mean (IQR) hospitalization was 2.2 (1-4) days, and the suprapubic drainage tube was removed after 12 (7-18) days. The complications after treatment were: urinary tract infections in five patients (16%), stenosis of the intraprostatic and membranous urethra in three (10%), and secondary infravesical obstruction in four (13%). At 12 months after the procedure, 28 patients (93%) were continent. Seven of the 30 men (23%) had a positive prostate biopsy. At the 1-year follow-up only three of the 30 patients with high-risk prostate cancer had a PSA level of >0.3 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU is a modern, minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer, often used in selected patients with localized disease. The present results show that HIFU was also feasible in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The low complication rates and favourable functional outcome support the planning of further larger studies in such patients. The oncological efficacy of HIFU should be assessed in further studies with a longer follow-up.     

Transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of localized prostate cancer

Objectives: To assess the long‐term outcomes of transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: From May 2003 to present, 137 consecutive patients with T1‐2 prostate cancer were treated using the Sonablate 500 and then followed for more than 12 months after their last HIFU treatment. A prostate biopsy was routinely carried out at 6 months and serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) was measured every 3 months after HIFU. Oncological outcomes as well as treatment‐related complications were assessed. Disease‐free survival (DFS) was judged using the Phoenix definition (PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL), negative histological findings and no local or distant metastasis. Results: The median follow up after HIFU was 36 months (range 12–84 months). No patients received adjuvant therapy during this period. The PSA nadir occurred at 2 months after HIFU and the median level was 0.07 ng/mL (0.01–2.01 ng/mL). Of the 133 patients who underwent prostate biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate at 6 months or later after HIFU, six were positive for cancer cells (4.5%). There were no major postoperative complications, but urge incontinence (16 cases) and dysuria (33 cases) occurred after removal of the urethral catheter. The 5‐year DFS rate was 78% based on these criteria, and 91%, 81% and 62% in the low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk group, respectively. Conclusions: HIFU represents an effective, repeatable and minimally invasive treatment. It is particularly effective for low‐ and intermediate‐risk patients, and it should be considered as an option for localized prostate cancer.     

Comparison of Gleason scores from sextant prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the Gleason scores obtained from sextant prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients having a clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer underwent needle biopsy under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and RP. Grading and staging were assigned based on Gleason scores and the TNM system, respectively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.5 +/- 13.43 years and mean PSA level was 14.69 +/- 3.95. Mean Gleason score for prostate biopsy and RP specimen were 5.85 +/- 0.7 and 6.34 +/- 1.44, respectively. With respect to clinical stage, there were 20 patients in stage 1 and 41 patients in stage 2 prostate cancer. Comparing the Gleason scores, the biopsy score was lower in 26 (42.26%) and higher than RP specimens in 7 (11.84%) cases, and there was agreement between the biopsy and RP specimens in 28 (45.9%) patients. The difference between the two Gleason scores was +/- 1 for 18 patients (29.5%) and +/- 2 or more for 17 patients (27.86%). CONCLUSION: In our study, high Gleason score biopsies with elevated PSA level (>10 ng/ml) were risk factors for extraprostatic extension, and we demonstrated that Gleason scores were significantly correlated with seminal vesicle and lymph node invasion (p < 0.05). The Gleason scores of biopsy and RP specimens agreed with 45.9% of TRUS-guided sextant prostate biopsies, and this ratio was 91.1% in moderately differentiated tumors Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor the prostate for residual disease or local cancer recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluating changes in the prostate after transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for treating prostate cancer, correlating the findings with histology to assess its possible role in predicting the outcome, evaluating residual cancer or local recurrence of disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with prostate cancer were assessed with MR and MR spectroscopy (MRS) before and at 1, 4 and 12 months after HIFU, assessing the glandular volume and MRI and MRS data after HIFU. These data were correlated with the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels at each examination (suspicious for residual cancer if >0.5 ng/mL) and with histological findings of prostate biopsy sampling at 6–8 months (random or targeted at suspicious MR areas).

RESULTS

Variations in volume during the follow‐up were not associated with treatment outcome. MRI was suspicious for residual cancer in one patient at 1 month and in another two at 4 months; in all three patients (one with a PSA level of <0.5 ng/mL) targeted biopsies were positive for cancer. MRI was negative in seven patients; in six of these (one with a PSA level of >0.5 ng/mL) random biopsies were negative, and in one the random biopsies were positive for residual cancer. At 4 months there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.015) between patients responsive to treatment and those with persistent disease, by combining negative MRI with a PSA level of <0.5 ng/mL; MRS data were suitable for analysis only in three patients with partial necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data support the role of MRI in association with PSA levels as a useful and accurate tool in the follow‐up of patients treated with HIFU for prostate cancer. However, considering the economic issue, it should not be used routinely and should be limited to detecting residual cancer (in patients with a PSA level of >0.5 ng/mL) with the main purpose of improving the detection rate of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided prostate biopsy. MRS data had no additional value over MRI. Further evaluation is needed to compare the use of contrast media and other techniques (e.g. colour Doppler TRUS) in detecting residual or local recurrent cancer.     

High-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer; a systematic literature review of the French Association of Urology

We discuss the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with prostate cancer, to define the best indications for HIFU in daily clinical practice as primary therapy. We searched Medline and Embase for clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of HIFU in prostate cancer (July 2007), and abstracts presented at the 2005-2007 annual meetings of the European Association of Urology and American Urological Association were screened. In all, 37 articles/abstracts were selected. As the data on HIFU as salvage therapy were limited, we focused on HIFU as primary therapy. Studies consisted of case series only. Included patients were approximately 70 years old with T1-T2 N0M0 disease, Gleason Score or=70 years) with T1-T2 N0M0 disease, a Gleason score of <7, a PSA level of <15 ng/mL and a prostate volume of <40 mL. In these patients HIFU achieves short-term cancer control, as shown by a high percentage of negative biopsies and significantly reduced PSA levels. The median-term survival data also seem promising, but long-term follow-up studies are needed to further evaluate cancer-specific and overall survival rates before the indications for primary therapy can be expanded.     

Five years experience of transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound using the Sonablate device in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally invasive technique used in achieve coagulation necrosis. We evaluated biochemical disease-free survival rates, predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HIFU. METHODS: A total of 181 consecutive patients underwent HIFU with the use of Sonablate (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. The median age and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were 70 years (range 44-88) and 9.76 ng/mL (range 3.39-89.60). A total of 95 patients (52%) were treated with neoadjuvant hormones. The median follow-up period for all patients was 18.0 months (range 4-68). RESULTS: The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in all patients were 84%, 80% and 78%, respectively. The biochemical disease-free survival rates at 3 years for patients with pretreatment PSA less than 10 ng/mL, 10.01-20.0 ng/mL and more than 20.0 ng/mL were 94%, 75% and 35%, respectively (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified pretreatment PSA (P<0.0001) as a independent predictor of relapse. CONCLUSION: High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy appears to be a safe and efficacious minimally invasive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer, especially those with a pretreatment PSA level less than 20 ng/mL.     

Prostate cancer treatment by the latest focal HIFU device with MRI/TRUS-fusion control biopsies: A prospective evaluation

Objectives

Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion-guided focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy of the prostate has recently been developed as a selective HIFU-therapy technique to enable targeted ablation of prostate cancer. Here we report a series of patients treated with focal HIFU therapy, discuss its potential pitfalls, and address controversies concerning the indications.

Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran

OBJECTIVE: To report the results from an Iranian large population-based randomized study of screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to detect prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3758 Iranian men older than 40 years were mass checked by PSA-based screening. Men with an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum total PSA level of greater than 4 ng/mL, underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided extended prostate biopsy. RESULTS: The PSA value (mean +/- standard deviation, SD) in all men without prostate cancer was 1.6 +/- 1.1 ng/mL and in those with cancer 18 +/- 44.8 ng/mL (P = 0.001). PSA values increased with age. In those aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and > or = 70 years, the mean +/- SD PSA values were 1.3 +/- 0.7, 1.4 +/- 0.8, 1.8 +/- 1 and 2.2 +/- 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. Among the screened men, 323 (8.6%) had a serum PSA concentration greater than 4 ng/mL. Of patients who underwent prostate biopsy (230, 71.2%), 129 (positive predictive value, 56.1%) had prostate cancer. Additionally, nine cancers were detected among 16 patients with PSA of less than 4 ng/mL who had a doubtful DRE finding. The overall cancer detection rate was 3.6%; 1.4% at 40-49, 1.6% at 50-59, 4.2% at 60-69 and 12.9% at >/=70 years. Conventional systematic sextant biopsies, which accounted for six of the 10 cores in our biopsy scheme, detected 98 (71%) of the cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The Iranian male population develops prostate cancer quite commonly if their serum PSA levels are greater than 4.0 ng/mL. In this study, 65.9% of the detected cancers were clinically significant. The conventional systematic sextant technique may be inappropriate for detection of all prostate cancers. The results need to be confirmed in other randomized trials.     

Radical prostatectomy: pathology findings in 1001 cases compared with other major series and over time

OBJECTIVE: To examine the preoperative features and pathological outcomes of clinical significance of 1001 consecutive essentially unscreened men who had a radical prostatectomy (RP) in the UK between 1988 and 2002, and their changes over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The details of men whose RP specimen was submitted for analysis were entered into the RP database held at the University College Hospital, London; the National Health Service and private patients of 17 surgeons were included. The age, mode of diagnosis, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy and RP findings were compared over time. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of the men was 62 (40-76) years, the median PSA 8 (0.1-146) ng/mL and the median biopsy Gleason sum score 6; these preoperative features did not change over the study period. The diagnosis of prostate cancer was made by transurethral resection of the prostate alone in 48 men (5%). The maximum number of patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen ablation was 21 (33%) in 1996, and subsequently declined. The median (range) RP Gleason sum score was 7 (4-9). The biopsy Gleason score correlated with the prostatectomy Gleason score in 252 (47%) of 536 men, being lower in 170 (32%) and higher in 113 (21%). The median tumour volume was 2 mL (focus of invasive acini - 31 mL) and the incidence of positive intra- and extraprostatic margins was 52%. Both tumour volume and extraprostatic margin positivity declined with time. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative features and pathological findings from this UK series are similar to those of other reported cohorts from unscreened populations. The incidence of positive extraprostatic surgical margins, tumour volume and stage decreased with time.     

Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine the outcome of patients diagnosed with ‘low‐risk’ prostate cancer managed by active surveillance (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 157 men with localized prostate cancer were followed on AS. The inclusion criteria for AS included: Gleason score of ≤ 6, a serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤15 ng/mL, stage ≤ T2, low‐volume disease and >12 months of follow‐up. The follow‐up was rigorous, with PSA tests and a digital rectal examination every 3 months for 2 years, and a repeat biopsy 6–12 months after the initial diagnosis and yearly when indicated. Continuance of AS was based on the PSA doubling time, re‐biopsy score, Gleason score, tumour volume, stage progression and patient preference.

RESULTS

In all 99 patients met the inclusion criteria; their mean age at diagnosis was 66 years, their mean PSA level 5.77 ng/mL and the mean follow‐up 45.3 months. On initial repeat biopsy, 63% had no cancer and 34% had a Gleason sum of ≤ 6. Eight patients were treated (three with hormones; five with curative intent); two had radical prostatectomy (one had pT2c pNO Gleason 7 disease); three had radiotherapy. The probability is that 85% would remain treatment‐free at 5 years; no patient died from prostate cancer. The PSA doubling time and clinical stage at diagnosis were predictive of progression.

CONCLUSION

Patients who are followed on AS must be selected using narrowly defined inclusion criteria and closely followed with a standard regimen of PSA testing, digital rectal examination and repeat biopsy.     

超声造影经直肠前列腺靶向穿刺活检术在PSA 4~10 ng/ml患者中的作用

目的探讨超声造影经直肠前列腺靶向穿刺活检术（CETRUS-PB）在PSA 4~10 ng/ml患者中的作用。 方法2016年1月至2018年12月，番禺中心医院82例泌尿外科收治的PSA 4~10 ng/ml的患者根据自愿原则被分入系统性经直肠超声前列腺穿刺活检术组（STRUS-PB）和CETRUS-PB组，比较两组穿刺的效率、视觉模拟疼痛评分（VAS）以及并发症。 结果CETRUS-PB与STRUS-PB组在PSA 4~10 ng/ml的患者中穿刺阳性率差异无统计学意义（P=0.147），两组穿刺针数、Gleason评分以及视觉疼痛评分的比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.001），两组均未出现严重并发症。 结论在PSA 4~10 ng/ml患者中，CETRUS-PB不能显著提高穿刺阳性率，但可以提高穿刺的精准度，减少穿刺针数，减轻痛苦。     

The short-term prostate-specific antigen velocity before biopsy can be used to predict prostatic histology

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the short-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity before biopsy can be used to predict prostatic histology, and to assess the role of a second PSA measurement before prostate biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 197 patients who were referred for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and prostate biopsy. The PSA level was initially measured at the first outpatient assessment; patients with a serum PSA level of < 4 ng/mL and > 50 ng/mL were excluded. Blood samples were taken just before prostate biopsy for the second PSA measurement. The mean interval between the measurements was 2.2 months. The short-term PSA velocity was calculated and correlations between this variable and age, prostate volume and initial PSA levels determined. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the short-term PSA velocity of patients with benign prostate histology and those with prostate cancer (P < 0.05). The short-term PSA velocity alone had the same diagnostic accuracy as the serum PSA level (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.612). There was only a weak correlation between the short-term PSA velocity and prostate volume. However, there was no correlation with age and initial PSA level in patients with benign histology. The second PSA measurement had higher specificity without losing sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The short-term PSA velocity estimated before biopsy can be used to predict prostatic histology. By measuring serum PSA 2 months after the first in patients with serum PSA level of 4-10 ng/mL, the number of negative biopsies can be reduced by 17%.     

The role of power Doppler-guided prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer]

Between March 1997 and December 1998, a total of 170 cases with an abnormal serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level (range: 4.1-200, mean: 20.5 +/- 31.0) were chosen for this study. Following the evaluation of the prostate using power Doppler imaging (PDI) with a 7.5 MHz transrectal probe, the hypervascular lesion (HVL) was biopsied transperineally under PDI real-time guidance. Thereafter, when gray-scale transrectal sonography revealed a hypoechoic lesion, additional samples were taken from them. Finally, sextant systematic biopsy was performed in all cases. Prostatic biopsy was positive for cancer in 41 cases (24%). The positive biopsy rate was 59% (40/68) in cases with HVL, compared to 1% (1/102) in cases with no HVL (p < 0.0001). In 107 patients with serum PSA 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml, biopsy was positive in 13 cases (12%). The positive biopsy rate was 38% (12/32) in cases with HVL, compared to 1% (1/75) in cases with no HVL (p < 0.0001). These results imply that HVL represents the neovascularity or increased perfusion of blood in the cancer lesion. Power Doppler-guided prostatic biopsy could be promising as a new biopsy technique in patients with abnormal PSA levels including moderately elevated PSA levels (4.1-10.0 ng/ml).